Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AIS-AIM Transition in Hong Kong, China
22 October 2018
2
Content
AIS – AIM Transition Progress
Experience sharing
Towards Phase 3 of AIS – AIM Transition
3
AIS – AIM Transition
Progress
4
AIS – AIM Transition Progress
Completed:
100 % of Phase 1 Steps
88% of Phase 2 Steps
Phase 1
Consolidation
Phase 2 Going Digital Phase 3 Information Management
P-
03
P-
04
P-
05
P-
17
P-
01
P-
02
P-
06
P-
07
P-08 P-11 P-
13
P-
14
P-
15
P-
09
P-
10
P-
12
P-
16
P-
18
P-
19
P-
20
P-
21
eAIP Digi-
tal
Hong
Kong,
China
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 50% ✔ ✔ 30
%
40
%
40
%
50
%
60
%
30
%
5
Experience sharing
6
AIS in Hong Kong, China
Managed by Hong Kong Aeronautical Information Management Centre
long established Quality Management System (QMS) base on ISO 9001 standard since 2007
Certified to meet the latest version ISO 9001:2015 in August 2018
Fulfilled P-17 Quality
7
Current focus
Currently focus on completing Phase 2
P-15 - Aerodrome Mapping
P-11 - Electronic AIP (e-AIP)
8
Aerodrome Mapping
Final stage
Survey conducted by aerodrome operator – Airport Authority Hong Kong
Aerodrome operator is preparing the aerodrome mapping database in common Geographical Information System (GIS) format and AIXM 5.1 format
CAD will then validate completeness and format of the data
9
Aerodrome mapping data in GIS platform
10
Aerodrome mapping data in GIS platform
11
Electronic AIP (e-AIP)
Revamped AIS website
Free email notification services on publication of AIP AMDT, AIP SUP and AIC
Launched on 16 Aug 2018
12
Electronic AIP (e-AIP)
Final stage of production
Aim to launch in 2019 in line with the “Regional AIM Capability Phase II” target published in “Asia/Pacific Regional Plan For Collaborative AIM”
13
Experience in e-AIP production
Importance of aeronautical data quality assurance
Considerable time is needed to verify and crosscheck data in AIP
Expect to discover discrepancies long existing in AIP during the verification process
14
Experience in e-AIP production
Stringent data requirement
The original names of the obstacles were both “ Hill at Tuen Mun” in paper-based AIP.
Need to change to different names in e-AIP
15
Experience in e-AIP production
Same abbreviation with different meaning
“CH” – Channel in ICAO DOC 8400
There is a DVOR/DME with IDENT “CH” in Hong Kong
Without manual manipulation, Navaid IDENT CH could be recognized as “Channel” in the e-AIP system
GEN 2.2
16
Experience in e-AIP production
NAVAID IDENT CHANNEL
17
Aeronautical data quality assurance
Ensure compliance with ICAO publication resolution requirements
Difference in publication resolution requirements in ICAO Annex for different phases of flight
18
Aeronautical data quality assurance
Example:
Radio navigation aid
Geographical location of the radio navigation aid
Publication Resolution requirement:
En-route Aerodrome
1 Sec 1/10 Sec
19
Aeronautical data quality assurance
Example:
Instrument Flight Procedure
Geographical location of the fix
Publication Resolution requirement:
En-route navaids and fixes, holding, STAR/ SID points
Final approach fixes/ points and other essential fixes/
points comprising the instrument approach
procedure
1 Sec 1/10 Sec
20
Aeronautical data quality assurance
What if the same fix is used as the fix for both SID/STAR procedure and Instrument Approach Procedure?
Go for the more restrictive publication resolution
ICAO Annex 15 (applicable in November 2018):
21
Aeronautical data quality assurance
Develop a data catalogue for e-AIP production
Verify currently published value in AIP against ICAO publication resolution requirements
22
Aeronautical data quality assurance
Data Quality Monitoring
Continuous effort in ensuring aeronautical data and information provided to AIS meet the requirements in:
accuracy
resolution
integrity
completeness
format
traceability
timeliness
23
Towards Phase 3 of
AIS – AIM Transition
24
Towards Phase 3 of AIS – AIM Transition
Expected to be more challenging than Phases 1 and 2
Guidance materials supporting implementation of Phase 3 components would be essential
25
Major challenges identified
P-09 Aeronautical data exchange
Asia/Pacific Seamless ATM Plan V2.0:
Preferred ATM Service Levels (PASL) Phase II
System supporting complete implementation of Phase 3 using minimum AIXM 5.1
Issues of incompatibility between States using the AIXM 4.5 system and States using AIXM 5.1 system
Incompatibility between AIXM 5.1 systems and products developed by different systems providers
26
Continuous industry-wide efforts globally and
regionally
AIM Steering Group (AIM-SG)
AIXM Change Control Board (AIXM CCB)
AAITF
AIM workshop
27
Major challenges identified
P-19 Interoperability with meteorological products
P-20 Electronic aeronautical charts
P-21 Digital NOTAM
Integration of various aeronautical, meteorological, flight information exchange systems and geographical information system
Vital in the future SWIM environment
Three least achieved steps among APAC States
28
Electronic aeronautical charts, interoperable MET
products and digital NOTAM
Electronic aeronautical charts, based on digital databases and the use of geographic information systems, to complement some paper charts
MET information interoperable with aeronautical products like electronic aeronautical charts to visually display MET information
Graphical digital NOTAM overlay on electronic aeronautical charts
Could enhance safety and efficiency
29
Sample electronic aeronautical charts
Source: ENAIRE (ANSP of Spain)https://ais.enaire.es/insignia/index_en.aspx
30
Sample digital NOTAM
Source: ENAIRE (ANSP of Spain)https://ais.enaire.es/insignia/index_en.aspx
31
How could digital products enhance safety?
Case study: Flight X at Airport A
The flight was cleared to land on RWY 28R but instead lined up with parallel TWY C
RWY 28L was closed (promulgated by NOTAM), pilots mistaken RWY 28R as RWY 28L and TWY C as RWY 28R
Source: NTSB summary of Public Meeting September 25, 2018
32
How could digital products enhance safety?
Source: NTSB
33
How could digital products enhance safety?
The NTSB identified:
Need for more effective presentation of flight operations information to optimize pilot review and retention of relevant information.
Although the NOTAM about the runway 28L closure appeared in the flight release and the 4 ACARS messages that were provided to the flight crew, the presentation of that information did not effectively convey the importance of the runway closure information and promote flight crew review and retention.
34
How could digital products enhance safety?
Could have avoided the occurrence……IF digital NOTAM with graphical display of RWY 28L Closure had been available
Highlighted the importance of digital NOTAM in enhancing safety
35
Working together
Hong Kong, China raised discussion in AAITF/13
Conclusion adopted in APANPIRG/29:
ICAO is urged to provide guidance on best practices for implementing AIM Roadmap Phase 3 Steps P-19, P-20 and P-21.
36
Working together
Working Paper WP/107 presented in Thirteen Air Navigation Conference by the International Federation of Aeronautical Information Management Associations (IFAIMA)
“At global level ICAO shall expedite the establishment of a working arrangement to address AIM domain-specific subjects with high priority given to support implementation.”
“Particular attention should be directed to the development of guidance material, the need to update the roadmap for the transition from AIS to AIM, revise and/or enhance existing requirements”
37
Working together
IFAIMA also suggested in WP/107 that:
ICAO shall expedite establishment of a working arrangement to address:
“facilitating the migration of existing paper-based aeronautical charting products into the digital environment and identify requirements for the graphical representation of aeronautical information in a SWIM environment.”
“facilitate the provision of digital data sets”
“develop an operational concept and corresponding provisions for the establishment of an information service that serves as a replacement for the information currently provided by NOTAMs.”
38
Working together
Guidance material from ICAO is vital to enable States to implement these three essential steps , which could enhance safety and efficiency
P-19 Interoperability with meteorological products
P-20 Electronic aeronautical charts
P-21 Digital NOTAM
39
Working together
Apart from ICAO’s role at global level, support and work by States and ANSPs are also vital
Quality Management and data quality assurance are important
In an automated environment, quality matters.
Garbage in , garbage out
Continuous industry-wide effort globally and regionally
40
Thank You