Upload
marybeth-cole
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Based upon Abe Raab Model
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
1. Initiates own objectives
Measures of Team Autonomy
Has necessary resources and authority.
3. Monitors own performance
4. Performs own corrective actions
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Is it a TEAM, or just a GROUP?Members, the common bond, leader type and
recognition will depend upon two major factors:
1.Interdependence v. Independence
2.Complexity v. Predictability
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Characteristics of Group Interdependence
The process is sequential or complementary with each person fulfilling a pre-defined component
The group is focused on a pre-defined group of
customers , competitors or users.
The image of the group as a whole affects the individual credibility of its members.
The group has a pre-defined mission or objective to be accomplished .
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Characteristics of Job Complexity
There is low immediate interchangeability of skills or assignments.
The specialized skills contributed by group members are seen as a vocation or profession.
It is unlikely that the skills and hard work of one team member can off-set underperformance by the others.
Team member acceptance is based upon relevant education, reputation and experience.
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Defining Group V. Team Differences
HIGH COMPLEXITY
LOW
INTERDEPENDENCE
Specialist Group
LOW COMPLEXITY
LOW
INTERDEPENDENCE
Work Group
HIGH COMPLEXITY
HIGH
INTERDEPENDENCE
Project Team
LOW COMPLEXITY
HIGH
INTERDEPENDENCE
Work Process
Team
Work Clarity/Predictability
INTERDEPENDENCE
Alexander Performance Management, Inc. Argyle, Texas
Interdependence
Complexity
WORK PROCESS TEAMMembers: People who can do the key tasks of the team.
Common Bond: Identity based upon team performance and innovation.
Leader Type: Business Agent, Enabler, Steward
Recognition: Team effectiveness and individual special contributions.
PROJECT OR RESEARCH TEAMMembers: Contributing, cross-functional
experts.
Common Bond: Customer acceptance of team’s effort.
Leader Type: Respected Advocate and Synthesizer.
Recognition for: Value of expertise contributed blended with team project success.
SPECIALIST’S GROUPMembers: Autonomous, independent
contributors
Common Bond: Profession & location.
Leader Type: Expertise, a Role model and spokesperson.
Recognition: Individual creativity and expertise shared with others.
WORK GROUPMembers: Independent workers frequently in a defined labor category.
Common Bond: Strength in unity to overcome perceived exploitation.
Leader Type: Even-handed, consistent job assigner.
Recognition: Compliance with specific, individual job rules and exceeding expectations on work assignments.
Balancing Team and Individual Performance
GROUPS TEAMS