Upload
api-3853188
View
14
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
branding,repositioning,marketing
Citation preview
ALL OUTMarketing a mosquito repellant
15238%
184(46%)
52(13%)
12(3%)
Mat Coil Vapour Cream
Total market=Rs400Cr(1999)
Mosquito Repellant Market
318.7(63%)
136.6(27%)
25.3(5%)
25.3(5%)
Total market=Rs506Cr(1996)
318.7
152 136.6
184
25.352
25.312
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Mat Coil Vaporiser Cream
96 99
Market Growth
36(69%)
11(21%)
4.5(9%)
0.5(1%)
All Out GK Bayer Jet
Total Market =Rs 52Cr(1999)
Vapour Market Share
25(55%)
19(40%)
2(5%)
Total Market =Rs 46Cr(1997)
SAFETY
PHYSIOLOGICAL
Mosquito Repellants
Need Hierarchy
Longevity
Ease to use
Odo
urP
hysical Contact
CrCo
S
M
S
M
CoCr
S Cr
Co
M MCo
CrS
Product Mapping
Attributes Cream Coil Spray Mat Vapour
No Physical contact with Chemicals
Odour less
Application Ease
Longevity
Consistency
Comparison Chart
Complex Variety
Dissonance Habitual
High involvement low involvement
Significant difference b/w brands
Few difference b/w brands
Buying Behaviour
Good health
Sound sleep
Relief from mosquito bites
Repellant
•Easy to use•Long lasting•Odourless•Smokeless
•Latest in tech•Consistent•Value for money
Vapouriser
Purchase Decision
Protection frommosquito
•MMR•Pluggy
•Japanese tech•Market leader
All Out
Purchase Decision
SINCERE
COMPETITIVE
EXCITING
RUGGED SOPHISTICATED
BRAND PERSONALITY
ALL OUT
Bra
nd s
tren
gth
Brand Stature
High
Low
HighLow
Y&R Grid
Evolution – Future of repellants is vaporizers and All Out will try to maintain its leadership
Activities- Evening news/cricket/movies
Who the brand is ?
e
an
oi
to
m
l
ra
tio
na
l
e
es
en
c
Pr
in
ta
ng
ib
le
Origin – Japanese
Reputation –Consistent Performance
Presentation – Distinct MMR
Mosquito eating frog
Functional – Application Ease.
Internal – Safety from mosquito borne diseases/undisturbed sleep
External – health consciousness
Perceived Value – Long lasting/Value for money
What the brand offers?Brand Benefits Brand Identity
Process –Easy Availability of refill packs.
Mckinsey Model
Japan
ese te
ch
Extra
MM
R
Value f
or money
GSLL/HLL/R
&C
Upper-Upper/Lower-
Upper/Upper
middle/m
iddle
Before & while
sleeping
Why ?
Against Whom ?
For Whom ?
When ?
BRAND POSITIONING
1350
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
All out
All out
18
54 55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
All Out GN RC
All Out GN RC
Distribution% presence Retailers/distributor
Vapour
Mats
Coils
All Out
Retail Presence
GSLL/R&C
ALL OUT
High
Low
High Low
Ret
ail P
rese
nce
Sales
Distribution matrix
Deadly exchange offer
‘90 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’99
225
135
99
90
Skimming
Loss leader
Bundling
Deadly offer
27
‘98
PricingP
er u
nit p
rice
(Rs)
Year
PREMIUM
HIGH VALUE
SUPER VALUE
OVER CHARGE
MEDIUM VALUE
GOOD VALUE
RIP-OFF
FALSE ECONOMY
ECONOMY
HIGH MEDIUM LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
Qua
lity
Price
PRICING STRATEGY
All Out
Inno
vati
vene
ss
Cost effectiveness
High
Low
HighLow
Communication Strategy
Introduction Growth Maturity DeclineIntroduction Growth Maturity Decline
Reach
Frequency
Inform Persuade Remind
Communication Objective
Awareness remains the same
Att
enti
on r
espo
nse
mea
sure
No of commercials exposures
All outLiquid vaporizer
Communication Strategy
frequency
impact
reach
Actual
Ideal
Communication vector
RTB RNTB
T.O.M Recall
Health Consciousness
Value for money
Less efficacySide Effect
Repetitive adsAvailability
Market LeaderR
TB
RN
TB
RTB/RNTB
ALL OUT
High
Low
HighLow
Hea
lth
Con
scio
usne
ss
Per Capita Usage
Market trend
CoilsVap
Creams
MatsSal
es
Time
PLC
Penetration DevelopmentCurrent
New
NewCurrent
Mar
ket
Product
Strategy
Advertise for increasing category usage
Mar
ket p
enet
rati
on
Market share
High
Low
HighLow
Communication Strategy
Modest Adv to maintain brand salience
Com
peti
tors
sha
re o
f vo
ice
Market share
High
Low
HighLow
Communication Strategy
All OutHigh
Low
HighLow
Sid
e E
ffec
ts
Efficacy
Product Upgradation
Repositioning
Attribute Positioning
Benefit Positioning
Xtra MMRHigh Efficacy
low Side effects
BE
(Coils)Existing
New
NewExisting
Bra
nd
Product
Brand Extension
BRAND
EXTN
Unrelated
Related
EsteemUpward
Downward
Upward
Downward
Upward
Downward
Upward
Downward
Average
Esteem
Average
(Repellant)
(Coil)
Extension of All Out Brand
Brand nam
e which
is
capita
lised
from our
vapouris
er
GSLL/BCL/R
&C
For lower m
iddle,
working class &
upper
lower
Before & while
sleeping
Why ?
Against
Whom ?
For Whom
?
When ?
BRAND POSITIONING (Coils)
Thank You
•All out mosquito repellent
•Sound & Secure sleep.
•Reliability-MMR
•Durability-45 nights
•Design-Pluggy
•Price-99
• Compact
•Aggressive
•Competitive
•Superiority-High on features
•Sense of Security.
.
• Active Loyalty.
•Healthy community
Performance Imagery
.
Consumer Judgment
Feeling
Resonance
BRAND EQUITY PYRAMID
Comprehensibility
Rel
evan
ce
Choo mantar
Freedom
All out
Brand Name Choice
• 1-8 Kunal
• 9-11 adarsh
• 12-15 shivani
• 16-20 sabin
• 21-36 varun
POINT OF SIMILARITIES
POINT OF DIFFERENCE
BRAND PERFORMANCE
HYGIENE
BRAND IMAGERY
MOTIVATION
PRODUCT DIFFRENTIATION
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1984 1985 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Year Cases in Mn
Mosquito menaceD
eath
s in
PP
M
Cas
es in
Mn
Brand Name
Vocal
Vis
ual
All Out
Brand Equity Parameters present in All Out
• Leader • Pricing• Stability• Technology• Winner Brand• Top Of Mind
• SOV (Share Of Voice)• Recognition• Recall• Dominance• Familiarity• Knowledge
25.33
35.88
18.4
10.92
0
4.68 2.30.52
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
All out GK Baygon jet
97 99
Market Growth