2
Alternative dispute resolution proceeding (ADR) Accelerated proceeding DECISION CASE NUMBER 27-02-2014 740 PF APPLICANT Novomatic AG (Corp. Reg. No. FN69548b) Wiener Strasse 158 2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria Counsel: ATT: Sara S och Mathilda N Bird & Bird Advokat KB Box 7714 103 95 Stockholm DOMAIN HOLDER Bai X Fuli Jia Yuan 19 Zhuang 302 Shi 313000 Huzhou Zhejiang China MATTER Alternative dispute resolution proceeding concerning the domain name <novomatic.se>. DECISION The arbitrator decides that the domain name <novomatic.se> shall be transferred to the Applicant.

Alternative dispute resolution proceeding (ADR ... · Alternative dispute resolution proceeding (ADR) Accelerated proceeding DECISION CASE NUMBER 27-02-2014 740 PF APPLICANT Novomatic

  • Upload
    lyquynh

  • View
    221

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Alternative dispute resolution proceeding (ADR)

Accelerated proceeding

DECISION CASE NUMBER

27-02-2014 740 PF

APPLICANT

Novomatic AG (Corp. Reg. No. FN69548b)

Wiener Strasse 158

2352 Gumpoldskirchen

Austria

Counsel: ATT: Sara S och Mathilda N

Bird & Bird Advokat KB

Box 7714

103 95 Stockholm

DOMAIN HOLDER

Bai X

Fuli Jia Yuan 19 Zhuang 302 Shi

313000 Huzhou

Zhejiang

China

MATTER

Alternative dispute resolution proceeding concerning the domain name <novomatic.se>.

DECISION

The arbitrator decides that the domain name <novomatic.se> shall be transferred to the

Applicant.

BACKGROUND TO THE DISPUTE

Novomatic AG (the Applicant) is since 2006 holder of the Community Trade Mark

NOVOMATIC (registration number 004135273).

The domain name <novomatic.se> was registered on 1 July 2013. The holder of the domain

name is Bai X, China (the Domain Holder).

The Applicant has initiated an alternative dispute resolution proceeding concerning the

domain name. The Applicant has asked for a decision after an accelerated proceeding in case

the Domain Holder does not reply to the application.

.SE appointed Tomas Norström to arbitrator in the dispute.

CLAIMS

The Applicant has claimed that the domain name shall be transferred to the Applicant

The Domain Holder has not submitted any response to the claim.

BRIEF FINDINGS OF THE ARBITRATOR

The Applicant has proven that it holds such entitlement as defined in point 7.2.1 of the Terms

and Conditions of Registration which is identical or similar to the domain name.

The Applicant has proven that the domain name was registered or used by the Domain Holder

in bad faith.

Circumstances in support of a right or justified interest to the domain name for the Domain

Holder, has not been demonstrated.

On behalf of .SE

……………………………………………………………

Tomas Norström