Upload
hakhanh
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An Electrochromic Bipolar Membrane Diode
Abdellah Malti, Erik Gabrielsson, Xavier Crispin and Magnus Berggren
Linköping University Post Print
N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article.
Original Publication:
Abdellah Malti, Erik Gabrielsson, Xavier Crispin and Magnus Berggren, An Electrochromic
Bipolar Membrane Diode, 2015, Advanced Materials, (27), 26, 3909.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201500891
Copyright: Wiley-VCH Verlag
http://www.wiley-vch.de/publish/en/
Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-120341
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500891R1
Article type: Communication
An electrochromic bipolar membrane diode
Abdellah Malti, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Xavier Crispin*, and Magnus Berggren
A. Malti, Dr. E. O. Gabrielsson, Prof. X. Crispin, Prof. M. Berggren
Laboratory of Organic Electronics, ITN
Linköping University
SE-601 74 Norrköping
Sweden
E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: PEDOT:PSS, printed displays, bipolar membranes, ionic diodes, electronic paper
Organic materials are successfully exploited in a wide range of electronic components and
devices. Some of the main advantages of organic electronics technologies include ease-of-
processing, flexibility and a lower industrial barrier of entry (which translates to lower
consumable prices).1-4 One of the most successful application paths of organic electronics is
the technology of organic light emitting diodes. Yet-another field of potentially great impact is
the organic electrochemical displays (OECD), a technology which may be flexible, fully-
printed, low-cost and easily integrated within a wide range of systems and substrates.
1
The large-area flat panel display technology is currently dominated by transmissive screens in
the form of back-lit liquid crystals (LCD).5 In applications where low-power is desired (such
as portable devices), transflective screens offer a very acceptable compromise.6 Emissive
screens wherein each and every pixel consists of a light emitting diode are slowly displacing
LCD screens.7 Non-emissive display technology is a superset of what is commonly termed
"electronic paper" (e-Paper). E-Paper may be based on a number of techniques, including
electrochromic displays which utilize chromogenic materials that (reversibly) change color
when they undergo a redox reaction.8 Electrochromic displays are attractive because they
consume little power. In addition to that, their production technology and overall processing is
fully compatible with well established roll-to-roll printing tools.9 A display’s (or pixel’s) fill-
factor is defined as the ratio between the active area to the total area of the display (or pixel).
The fill-factor is typically sacrificed in electrochromic matrix displays to accommodate the
active addressing circuitry.10 A passive matrix (PM) addressing circuit is constructed by
placing the display medium between a crisscross of front and rear electrodes. The resulting
grid forms the rows and columns of the display matrix and their intersection constitutes the
pixel.11 The addition of thin-film diodes or transistors to address the pixels in active matrix
(AM) displays sacrifices the fill-factor in favor of higher refresh rates and lower energy
consumption. Alas, active matrix addressing schemes are also significantly more expensive
and complex to produce (as compared with passively addressed display circuits). Figure 1
shows the layout for a PM and a transistor-enabled AM addressing scheme. In both cases, a
pixel is selected by applying a voltage on the corresponding row and column. The addition of
an active component in the AM constrains the voltage to the selected cell. In the PM,
however, the whole row and column are affected by the voltage, which leads to cross-talk on
the adjacent cells. Cross-talk voltage results in severe picture distortion. The active
component may be a transistor or a diode depending on the desired performance.
2
Electrochromic materials exhibit the property of change, evocation, or bleaching of color as a
result of undergoing a redox process (or by a sufficient electrochemical potential).12 Since
their advent some four decades ago, electrochromic materials have attracted considerable
attention for their potential use in display applications.13 Electrochromic materials may be
inorganic (e.g: oxides of transition metals) or organic (e.g: resonance stabilized aromatic
molecules).12 Because the latter are compatible with printing technology, they are generally
considered good candidates for low-cost displays in packaging, point-of-care testing,
authentication applications, and the so-called Internet of Things.14 Due to a high level of self-
discharge, OECDs suffer from poor retention time. This drawback increases the power
consumption enormously, because the display has to be refreshed at regular intervals.
Addressing of OECD is currently done through complex backplane electronic circuitry, which
hardly qualifies as printable (as it requires drilling of vias) or low-cost (due to the price of the
active electronic components).
The basic structure of an OECD includes two polymer electrodes and a common electrolyte.
The current versus voltage (I-V) characteristics of the OECDs is governed by the charging
and discharging of the electrodes in an electrochemical supercapacitor. Therefore, the I-V
characteristics lack a threshold or rectification behavior that would make passive matrix
addressing possible.
One of the most common printable conducting polymer explored in electrochromic display
settings is poly(3,4-ethylene-dioxythiophene) doped with poly(styrene-sulfonate)
(PEDOT:PSS) .
Upon biasing, the PEDOT phase changes from a transparent light blue (oxidized and
electrically conducting) state to an opaque dark blue (neutral and semiconducting) state when
it is reduced according to Equation 1.15
PEDOT+:PSS- + M+ + e- ↔ PEDOT0:PSS-:M+ (1)
3
Figure 2a shows the absorption spectra of PEDOT:PSS at different potentials (for an ECD
structure similar to Figure 3a. It is worth noting that the largest absorption peak shift occurs
around 660nm (red in the visible spectrum), and that there is a polarity-dependent absorption
asymmetry (Figure 2b).
A PEDOT:PSS electrochemical display is composed of two PEDOT:PSS electrodes separated
by an ionic conductor (typically, a solid electrolyte).9 Figure 3a-c illustrates the
electrochromic switching characteristics in a PEDOT:PSS OECD subjected to a potential bias.
Figure 3a depicts the pristine state with no potential applied across the device. In Figure 3b,
the negatively biased electrode undergoes reduction and the PEDOT:PSS changes from
(transparent) light blue to (opaque) dark blue. Figure 3c illustrates the reversibility of the
reaction when oppositely biased. Figure 3d shows a typical I-V curve for a PEDOT:PSS
electrochromic display. The box-like shape is reminiscent of a pseudocapacitor’s cyclic
voltammogram.16
Alongside electrochromic displays, an emerging area of research is that of organic iontronics,
i.e. devices that possess classical or novel electronic device functions but where the signal
carriers are ions instead of electrons. Iontronics may combine ion-selective membranes to
achieve specific functions. A cation [anion] selective membrane is composed of immobile
anionic [cationic] groups that favor the transport of mobile cations [anions] while preventing
the penetration/transport of anions [cations] through electrostatic repulsion (Donnan
exclusion). In electronics, there are hole- and electron-transporting materials, known as p-type
and n-type semiconductors; in iontronics, there are cation- and anion-transporting materials,
so called P-type and N-type materials. Iontronic circuits consist of a combination of various
types of ionic devices, such as PN-diodes also called bipolar membrane diodes, PNP or NPN
ion bipolar junction transistors and "ion pumps".17-19 Iontronics may interface with biological
4
systems since many biologically active molecules (such as neurotransmitters) are essentially
ions and can easily be transported through (or along) membrane device configurations.20 One
of the basic devices is the bipolar membrane which consists of an anion-selective membrane
and a cation-selective membrane in contact with one another. Figure 3e-g illustrates the BM
diode concept and its operating mechanism. Bipolar membrane diodes with a rectification
ratio beyond 1000 have been reported in the past. The rectification of an ion current may
potentially be used in electronic, electrochemical and iontronic devices and circuits to achieve
electronic current rectification and desired non-linearity in bias response.21,22 Figure 3e shows
the mobile ions distribution when the device is unbiased. Figure 3f shows the forward bias
mode where the anions/cations, propelled by the electric field, migrate towards the BM
junction. This accumulation of mobile ions along the junction gradually increases the
conductivity.17 In reverse bias mode, illustrated in Figure 3g, the mobile ions migrate away
from the BM junction and towards the electrodes. This depleted junction causes a significant
drop in ion concentration which, in turn, leads to a decrease in ionic conductivity.17 The
current-voltage characteristics is therefore similar to that of a diode (Figure 3h).
In this work, we propose to integrate addressability and electrochromism within the same
device by using an ionic diode based on a bipolar membrane (BM) stack sandwiched between
two PEDOT:PSS layers (see Figure 3i-k. In this combined architecture, current rectification
and addressability is provided by the bipolar membrane electrolyte, while the color switching
derives from the PEDOT:PSS electrode layer. We demonstrate that the integration of a BM
into an EC display introduces a non-linear I-V characteristics, a prerequisite for addressability
in a 2D matrix of EC pixels (Figure 3m)
To demonstrate this concept, we use monopolar and bipolar membranes to build vertical
ECDs similar to the devices depicted in Figure 3a and 3i (respectively). Figure 4a shows the I-
V characteristics of a monopolar membrane (≈450 µm thick Ralex CMH PAD) sandwiched
5
between two conducting polymer electrodes (200 nm thick AGFA-Gevaert Orgacon F-350
PEDOT:PSS film coated on a polyethylene terephthalate substrate). The I-V curve of this
OECD with a monopolar membrane electrolyte is typical for an electrochemical capacitor
wherein the current scales linearly with the scanrate (I = C ∂V/∂t). Figure 4b shows the I-V
characteristics for a bipolar membrane (~180 µm Fumatech Fumasep FBM) sandwiched
between two PEDOT:PSS electrodes. It is clear that asymmetry is introduced in the I-V curve
– with little current passing in the reverse bias regime. The capacitive component of the
current is evident in forward bias since the current (at 0.8 V) scales linearly with the scanrate.
This clearly demonstrates that the integration of a BM in an EC device introduces a current
non-linearity dictated by the combination of the electrochemical capacitor and the bipolar
diode. Biasing the PEDOT:PSS/BM/PEDOT:PSS cell in forward mode, as is the case in
Figure 3j, pushes the mobile ions towards the junction. This, in turn, increases the
conductivity through the BM and leads to a current flow through the cell. The redox reaction
takes place according to Equation 1. That is, the negatively biased electrode turns deep blue
while the positively biased one turns slightly more transparent (i.e. is further oxidized). In
Figure 2k, the BM junction is depleted and the PEDOT:PSS electrodes slowly recover their
original states and colors. Note that a simplified model of this EC diode can be seen as a diode
in series with a capacitor. Indeed, a conventional electronic diode (NXP - BAP1321-04,215)
connected in series with the EC display leads to a similar asymmetry in the I-V characteristics
with a pinched current in the reverse bias (see supplementary information). However, since
the BM is mostly transparent, it is difficult to follow the color switching characteristics during
operation of the device. Moreover, there is a residual current, likely due to water splitting, in
the reverse bias beyond -0.8 V that severely restricts the device’s window of operation.21,22
This residual current also limits the rectification of the EC diode.
6
The I-V characteristics of both membranes are shown for a series of different scan rates (5,
25, 50, 100 mV/s). The innermost curve corresponds to the slowest scan rate (5 mV/s), while
the outermost curve corresponds to the fastest one (100 mV/s). The slower the scan rates, the
less current passes through the devices. Figure 4a is similar in shape to that of Figure 3d.
Figure 4b shows the asymmetry in the I-V characteristics of an OECD with a bipolar
membrane.
With the aim of studying the electrochromism on both electrodes simultaneously, as well as to
improve the rectification properties of the EC diode, we built a planar version of the device as
depicted in Figure 5. Using a combination of photolithography with liquid-phase and plasma
etching, we microfabricated a bipolar membrane (50x50 µm channel) with two PEDOT:PSS
electrodes (2500x2500 µm) on a flexible substrate. The bipolar membrane was made from a
stack comprising a 800 µm thick polyphosphonium as well as a 200 µm thick polystyrene
sulfonate (PSS) film. The chemical structure of these materials is displayed in figure 5.
Polyphosphonium was used as a polyanion since it was reported to prevent electric field-
enhanced water dissociation in BM diodes.21,22 Figure 5 illustrates the microfabricated planar
bipolar membrane diode embedded in an electrochromic display as it would appear under
forward bias.
We applied a +/-8 V square pulse to the OECD-BM-diode and recorded the current response
(Figure 7a). The left probe is connected to the positive terminal while the right probe is
connected to the negative terminal of the power supply. Despite voltages outside the
electrochemical window of aqueous electrolytes, the electric field-enhanced water
dissociation is hindered owing to the inclusion of a non amine-based polycation.23 And
because the PEDOT:PSS electrodes are polarizable, the electrochemical water splitting into
hydrogen and oxygen gas is also prevented here.24 The on/off ratio of the device is found to be
close to 100. The device is operated longer in reverse bias than in the forward mode. The
7
reverse current is low (Ioff ≈ 10-9 A), so in 120 s only 3 µC passes through the device which is
not enough to cause any substantial electrochromism in the PEDOT:PSS electrodes. The color
of the two electrodes thus remains unchanged (Figure 6a). In forward bias, however, after 60 s
operation the total charge displaced between the two electrodes exceeds 120 µC and the right
hand side electrode becomes dark blue (Figure 6a). This is explained by the high ionic current
that passes through the bipolar membrane (Ion ≈ 10-6 A) which leads to a significant reduction
of PEDOT on the right electrode and oxidation of the left electrode (see Equation 1). The fact
that the right electrode undergoes a strong color change compared to the left electrode is due
to the non-linear absorption versus voltage profile for PEDOT (as expounded in Figure 6a).
Reversing the current leads to a sharp current peak attributed to the transitory double-layer
formation followed by a steep decline in current level. This kind of I-V characteristics is
observed in similar bipolar membrane devices.17 Only 2 µC are transferred between the
PEDOT electrodes during a time period of 120 s. And because of the aforementioned small
charge transfer, the electrodes don’t recover their initial (pristine) color. The right electrode,
however, becomes slightly less blue (Figure 6b).
The color change of the two electrodes is tracked simultaneously with a digital microscope
camera. Because PEDOT becomes blue when reduced (absorption around 600 nm as
indicated by Figure 2a), the red channel of the camera should be the one most sensitive to the
change in color. With this in mind, we follow the current vs. time (Figure 7a) and the red RGB
color space value versus time (Figure 7b). The solid line represents the right electrode
(cathode in forward bias mode) of the display (analogous to the top terminal in Figure 3e-g).
Similarly, the dashed line represents the left electrode (anode in forward bias mode) of the
display/diode (bottom terminal in Figure 3j-l. Since the RGB color space follows an additive
color mixing scheme, dark blue color is reflected as low values in the red channel of the
camera. When the voltage is reversed, the right electrode becomes slightly more transparent,
8
while the signal from the left electrode is almost constant. In contrast, when forward biased,
we observe sharp dips in the RGB red value of the right terminal, while there is virtually no
change in the left electrode. The periodicity of these dips matches the forward mode biasing
of the device. The variation in RGB red values of the right electrode (around 30 %) is
substantially larger than the variation in RGB red values of the left electrode (<2 %). The
electrochromism of the latter is barely visible to the naked eye as evidenced by Figure 6a
and 6c.
To explain these results, we propose the following mechanism: Substituting the BM for the
ionic conductor (i.e. the electrolyte) in the electrochemical display described in Figure 3a-c is
equivalent to embedding a diode within the display cell. Therefore, biasing the
PEDOT:PSS/BM/PEDOT:PSS cell in forward mode, as is the case for Figure 3j, pushes the
mobile ions towards the junction. This, in turn, increases the conductivity through the BM and
leads to a current flow through the cell. The redox reaction takes place according to
Equation 1, and the negatively biased electrode turns deep blue while the positively biased
one turns slightly more transparent. In reverse bias, however, the BM junction is depleted and
the PEDOT:PSS electrodes return to their original colors (see Figure 3k).
In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating an ionic diode inside an
electrochromic display using a bipolar membrane. The asymmetric conductance of this
embedded diode may be exploited to address a matrix of electrochemical display cells.
Current rectification is known to provide addressability in passive matrix circuits. Both
PEDOT:PSS electrochromic displays and bipolar membrane diodes are compatible with
printing techniques. Despite relying on photolithography in this work, the solution-
processability of all materials involved indicates that the manufacturing process may be
adapted for printing. This may potentially enable the manufacturing of cheap large-area
9
electrochromic displays. In such a configuration, the bipolar membrane electrolyte plays the
dual role of providing reactants for the electrochromism as well as rectifying the current for
addressing purposes.2,9 In effect, this provides a cost-effective way of building an
electrochromic display matrix by utilizing the bipolar membrane’s rectification to address the
display and selectively switch one side of the pixel only. These results also provide an easy
way to improve the retention time (bistability) of polymer electrochromic displays. Moreover,
the ionic bipolar membrane diode does not add any device features alongside that of the
display cell; it is incorporated between the electrodes and plays the role of both the electrolyte
and the rectifier. The integration of the BM diode into OECD cells would allow organic
displays to retain very high fill factors. However, due to the slow turn-on and turn-off times,
this technology is constrained to niche display applications where refresh rates in minutes are
acceptable (billboards, linear/matrix barcodes, electrochromic wallpaper, etc.).
Experimental Section
ECDs with commercially available membranes: The monopolar membrane (Ralex CMH
PAD) and the bipolar membrane (Fumatech Fumasep FBM) were soaked for 72 h in a 1 M
NaCl solution. The membranes were then sandwiched between two (<1 cm2) PEDOT:PSS
electrodes (5 µm thick Clevios PH1000 cast on PET) and held together by a clamp. We added
(<0.5 vol. %) octadecyltrimethoxysilane (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich) and heated the film
to 70° C for 120 s to crosslink the PEDOT:PSS. The devices were placed in a humid container
(>50 % RH) to maximize the ionic diffusion inside the membrane (by maintaining an optimal
swelling).
Preparation of poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) solution: Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) (PVBC,
Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved with tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 200 mg/ml and the solution
filtered through a 0.2 µm PTFE-membrane.
10
Preparation of polyphosphonium: 5 ml of a (0.2 µm PTFE-membrane filtered) 200 mg/ml
solution of Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) (PVBC, Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in tetrahydrofuran
(THF) was mixed with 1720 mg of triphenylphospine (Sigma-Aldrich) and heated at 60° C
for 24 h. The formed precipitate was dried in vacuum, dissolved in 4.5 ml of H2O and 2.46 ml
of 1-propanol and filtered through a 0.2 µm nylon filter. Finally, we add 6 ml of H2O and 8 ml
of 1-propanol.
Microfabricated planar ECDs: The electrodes and the cation-selective membrane were
patterned from PEDOT:PSS on polyethylene substrate (AGFA-Gevaert Orgacon F-350). The
substrate was cleaned using water and acetone, baked (110° C, 5 min) and poly(methyl
methacrylate) (PMMA, Sigma-Aldrich, average m.w. 120000, 4 mg/ml in Diethyl carbonate)
and Shipley S1805G2 photoresist was deposited by spin coating (4000 rpm, 30 s spin, 110° C
5 min bake each). The photoresist was patterned using a Karl Suss MA/MB6 mask aligner
and Microposit MF319 developer, followed by rinsing in H2O and baking (110° C, 5 min). A
CF4/O2 plasma was used to dry-etch the exposed PEDOT:PSS. The remaining photoresist and
PMMA was removed using Shipley Remover 1112A and acetone and rinsed in H2O. The
cation-selective channels were overoxidized (rendered electronically insulating) by exposure
to aqueous sodium hypochlorite (1 % vol/vol) for 45 s through openings in a patterned 1.3 µm
thick Microposit S1813G2 photoresist layer. The photoresist was removed and cleaned using
Shipley Remover 1112A, acetone, and water. A 2.5 µm thick SU8 (SU8-2002, Microchem)
layer was then deposited (1000 rpm, 30 s) and patterned, according to the manufactures
instructions, on top of the cation-selective channels to produce the 5x100 µm interface of the
BM. The PEDOT:PSS electrodes were shielded during the following processing steps by a
hard baked (110°, 1 h) 1.3 µm thick patterned Shipley S1813G2 layer. The anion-selective
membrane was deposited by spin coating (1500 rpm, 45 s) and baked at 110° C for 1 h,
followed by a layer of PMMA (40 mg/ml in DEC, 2000 rpm for 30 s) and a 1.3 µm thick
11
Shipley S1813G2 layer (each baked 110° C, 10 min). The anion-selective membrane was
patterned in a similar way as the PEDOT:PSS, but with acetone and isopropanol for removing
and rinsing. A 10 µm thick SU8-layer (SU8-2010, MicroChem) was deposited (3000 rpm, 30
s) and patterned to encapsulate the device, again according to the manufactures instructions.
Carbon contacts were painted onto the electrodes (baked 110° C, 5 min). The devices were
then soaked in H2O for 24 h prior to measurements. A 0.1 M aqueous sodium chloride
solution was used as electrolyte.
Characterization: We recorded the current response using a LabVIEW-controlled Keithley
2602A source meter, we ran a +/-8 V square pulse (respectively for 60/120 s) on the bipolar
membrane diode-display and recorded the current response. Pictures of the device were
recorded using a Nikon SMZ1500 microscope illuminated with white LEDs. The JPEG files
extracted from the Nikon NIS-Element Viewer did not undergo any form of post-processing.
RGB values were extracted with ImageMagick’s "convert" tool (in Bash 4.3.11). All
measurements were performed in ambient atmosphere at 23° C and 40 % relative humidity.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Swedish foundation for strategic research, the Knut
and Alice Wallenberg foundation, PEA-VINNOVA and the Advanced Functional Materials
Center at Linköping University. M.B acknowledges the Önnesjös stiftelse and X.C
acknowledges the European Research Council (ERC-starting grant 307596).
12
Received: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
Revised: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
Published online: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
[1] C. D. Dimitrakopoulos, P. R. L. Malenfant. Advanced Materials 2002, 14, 2.
[2] S. R. Forrest. Nature 2004, 428, 6986.
[3] J. M. Tour. Accounts of Chemical Research 2000, 33, 11.
[4] A. G. MacDiarmid. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition 2001, 40, 14.
[5] T. P. Brody, F. C. Luo, Z. P. Szepesi, D. H. Davies. IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices 1975, ED-22, 9.
[6] H. Y. Kim, Z. Ge, S. T. Wu, S. H. Lee. Applied Physics Letters 2007, 91, 23.
[7] C. W. Tang, S. A. Vanslyke. Applied Physics Letters 1987, 51, 12.
[8] C. M. Lampert. Materials Today 2004, 7, 3.
[9] P. Andersson, R. Forchheimer, P. Tehrani, M. Berggren. Advanced Functional
Materials 2007, 17, 16.
[10] D. Nilsson, M. Chen, T. Kugler, T. Remonen, M. Armgarth, M. Berggren. Advanced
Materials 2002, 14, 1.
[11] K. E. Lilja, T. G. Bäcklund, D. Lupo, J. Virtanen, E. Hämäläinen, T. Joutsenoja. Thin
Solid Films 2010, 518, 15.
[12] R. J. Mortimer. Electrochromic materials, volume 41 of Annual Review of Materials
Research. 2011.
[13] S. K. Deb. Phil Mag 1973, 17, 4.
13
[14] D. Tobjörk, R. Österbacka. Advanced Materials 2011, 23, 17.
[15] Q. Pei, G. Zuccarello, M. Ahlskog, O. Inganäs. Polymer 1994, 35, 7.
[16] M. E. Orazem, B. Tribollet. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, 2008.
[17] E. O. Gabrielsson, K. Tybrandt, M. Berggren. Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for
Chemistry and Biology 2012, 12, 14.
[18] K. Tybrandt, K. C. Larsson, A. Richter-Dahlfors, M. Berggren. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107, 22.
[19] J. Isaksson, P. Kjäll, D. Nilsson, N. Robinson, M. Berggren, A. Richter-Dahlfors.
Nature Materials 2007, 6, 9.
[20] D. T. Simon, S. Kurup, K. C. Larsson, R. Hori, K. Tybrandt, M. Goiny, E. W. H. Jager,
M. Berggren, B. Canlon, A. Richter-Dahlfors. Nature Materials 2009, 8, 9.
[21] R. Simons. Electrochimica Acta 1984, 29, 2.
[22] R. Simons. Nature 1979, 280, 5725.
[23] E. O. Gabrielsson, M. Berggren. Biomicrofluidics 2013, 7, 6.
[24] P. G. Erlandsson, N. D. Robinson. Electrophoresis 2011, 32, 6-7.
14
Figure 1. a) Passive matrix and b) active matrix addressing circuit layouts.
Figure 2. Optical properties of PEDOT:PSS. a) Optical absorption spectrum. b) Optical
absorption at 660 nm. c) Chemical structure of PEDOT:PSS.
15
Figure 3. Illustration (and typical I-V characteristics) of an electrochromic display, a bipolar
membrane, and the electrochromic bipolar membrane diode device. a-d) Organic
electrochromic display schematic and I-V characteristics. e-f) Electrode-agnostic bipolar
membrane schematic and I-V characteristics. i-m) Electrochromic bipolar membrane display
schematic and I-V characteristics. n) Schematics’ color code.
16
Figure 4. ECDs with commercially available monopolar and bipolar membranes. a) IV curve
for a monopolar membrane ECD at different scanrates (5, 25, 50, 100 mV/s). b) IV curve for a
bipolar membrane ECD at different scanrates (5, 25, 50, 100 mV/s).
Figure 5. Illustration of a microfabricated planar bipolar membrane diode embedded within
an electrochromic display.
17
Figure 6. Bipolar membrane diode in electrochemical display in a) reverse bias, b) forward
bias, and c) return to reverse bias.
Figure 7. Electrical and optical characterization of the bipolar membrane diode embedded in
an electrochemical display. a) Current rectification of the bipolar membrane diode. b) R(GB)
values of the bipolar membrane diode-display. Solid lines represent the cathode of the diode
and the dashed lines represent the anode.18
19
Conducting polymers are solution processible and offer bipolar membrane is a
complementary stack of selective membranes that may be used to rectify current.
Integrating a bipolar membrane into a polymer electrochromic display obviates the need for
an addressing backplane while increasing the device's bistability. Such devices can be made
from solution processible materials.
PEDOT:PSS, printed displays, bipolar membranes, ionic diodes, electronic paper
Abdellah Malti, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Xavier Crispin*, and Magnus Berggren*
An electrochromic bipolar membrane diode
20
Copyright WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, 2013.
Supporting Information
An electrochromic bipolar membrane diode
Abdellah Malti, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Xavier Crispin*, and Magnus Berggren
In order to show how a BM is essentially a monopolar membrane with a diode in series, we
fabricated a device similar to the one presented in Figure 3a (and Figure 4a). The I-V
characteristics is shown in Figure S1a. The box-like shape and the I-V curve’s symmetry were
expeted. Figure S1b shows the I-V characteristics of an NXP BAP1321-04,215 solid state
diode. We then put the diode in series with the monopolar membrane device (Figure 4a), and
the result in presented in Figure S1c. The hysterisis is due to the large capacitive component of
the current, while the excellent rectification of the solid-state diode prevents any current from
flowing in the reverse direction.
21
22
Figure S1. Monopolar membrane supercapacitor with a solid-state diode. a) Monopolar
membrane. b) Solid state diode. c) Diode in series with a monopolar membrane.
For the sake of comparison, we include the I-V plot of one of the better ionic bipolar
membrane diode. The BM diode is similar to the one in Figure 4b (i.e: Fumatech Fumasep
FBM membrane) but with 10 µm thick electrodes. The diode’s I-V characteristics include
"initialization time" (held in reverse bias for 80 s).17 Two sweeps at 500 mV/s are shown in
Figure S2. The device exhibits hysterisis comparable to the circuit in Figure S1c, albeit with
considerably more current flowing in reverse bias mode.
Figure S2. I-V curve of a bipolar membrane diode.
23