21
An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS

By: Vishana Ramdeen

Page 2: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Abstract

The ICESat (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite) spacecraft was launched on January 12, 2003 into a near-circular, low Earth, Sun-Synchronous Orbit with a 94 inclination. Its objective is to quantify the mass balance of the polar ice sheets and observe the changes with time. The only scientific observation instrument onboard is the GLAS (Geoscience Laser Altimeter System) instrument. It consists of three lasers (Laser 1, 2, and 3) which operate one at a time for three 33-day campaigns per year. GLAS’s Lasers 1 and 2 experienced a rapid decrease in laser energy which was attributed to issues with the frequency doubler, a manufacture defect of the laser diode pump array, and trace levels of outgassing. One of the major shortcomings of ICESat is systematic pointing errors. Two of the calibration methods used to compensate for these errors are ocean scans and “round” the world scans. The ICESat has provided scientists with information that is unsurpassed by any existing satellite and expectations for the future are high.

Page 3: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Agenda

• Introduction– Overview of the physical instruments

• ICESat• GLAS

– General and Orbital Characteristics

• GLAS Lasers• Shortcomings

– solutions

• Conclusion

Page 4: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Introduction

• ICESat = Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite

• Launched into orbit on January 12, 2003 on a Boeing Delta II rocket from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California

Page 5: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Introduction

• Inclination: 94– Retrograde Orbit

• Near circular, low Earth orbit• Sun-Synchronous Orbit• Altitude: 590 km initially

– currently at 600 km

• Orbital period: 96.6 minutes • Two reference tracks: 8-day exact repeat (for

calibration purposes) and 91-day exact repeat (for denser track coverage)

Page 6: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

ICESat

Schutz et al.: ICESat Overview

Page 7: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

ICESat’s Mission Objectives

• “The primary goal of ICESat is to quantify ice sheet mass balance and understand how changes in the Earth’s atmosphere and climate affect polar ice masses and global sea level.”

• Measures height profiles of clouds, aerosols distribution, vegetation cover, and land elevations.

Page 8: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

ICESat/GLAS

ICESat (zenith view)

GLAS

www.csr.utexas.edu/glas and glas.gsfc.nasa.gov

Page 9: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

GLAS

• GLAS = Geoscience Laser Altimeter System

• First LIDAR used for continuous global observations of the Earth

• A combination of a precision surface LIDAR with a sensitive dual-wavelength cloud and aerosol LIDAR

• Only scientific observational instrument on the ICESat spacecraft

Page 10: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

GLAS

• Consists of three lasers– referred to as Lasers 1, 2, and 3

• Mounted on a stationary optical bench• Laser measurement direction is nadir, but the

spacecraft can perform roll maneuvers to point up to 5° off nadir

• Only one laser is in operation at a time, pulsing at 40 Hz

• Pulse width is 5 nanometers

Page 11: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

GLAS Lasers

• Each pulse has an averaged 65 m footprint– successive laser pulses spaced 172 m along-track

• Area on the Earth’s surface covered by each pulse is not equal• Laser’s far field patterns are hypothesized to change due to the change of

spatial distribution of light from the laser diode pump arrays over time; more generally with laser energy and time

– laser diode pumps are used to produce very high power outputs such as that used for GLAS’s continuous pulses

Abshire et al.: Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)

Page 12: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

GLAS Lasers

• 2 out of the 3 lasers experienced more rapid energy loss than planned• After the first 10 days Laser 1’s transmitted energy began to rapidly decline

– by day 38 it completely failed– caused by manufacture’s defect of laser diode pump array

• To counter the effects of having less lasers, ICESat’s duty cycle was reduced from 100% to 25%– Lasers 2 and 3 are operating for three 33-day campaigns per year (Campaigns a, b, and c)

• Laser 2’s decline is attributed to a process related to the frequency doubler and trace levels of outgassing.

• To slow this fate, Laser 3 has been operating at a lower energy level

Abshire et al.: Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)

Page 13: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Coverage?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICESat

Page 14: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

How’s it done?• GLAS emits a 1064 nm (for

surface and cloud tops) and 532 nm (for atmospheric aerosols) laser pulse toward Earth’s surface.

– time emitted is recorded• Upon impact to a surface, the

photons are scattered back to the satellite.

• When the photons come into contact with the receiver another timestamp is taken.

– measurements of time of flight, emission angle relative to inertial space, transmitted pulse waveform, and echo pulse waveform are taken

– the time of flight is divided by 2 and multiplied by the speed of light giving us the distance

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/icesat_billion.html

Page 15: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Backscatter

• Strong echo pulses indicate a region of flat, bright ice

• 532 nm profiles (B) have better signal-to-noise ratios for weak aerosol backscatter because of their more sensitive photon counting detectors

A

B

Abshire et al.: Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)

Page 16: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

An Example

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/ICESat/Images/greenland_icesheet.jpg

Page 17: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Shortcomings

• Systematic pointing errors are preventing ICESat data from meeting its full potential– long-term trend bias– systematic variations with satellite orbital period

revolution

• These errors create elevation errors in the data and change with time

• They pose problems since they are indiscernible from actual surface elevation change

Page 18: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Can we fix it?

• Ocean scans– performed twice a day over the mid-Pacific– errors are estimated through the reduction of

the ocean surface range deviations from each ocean scan

• “Round” the world scans– performed every 8 days– estimates the systematic pointing errors as a

function of orbital angle

Page 19: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

ICESat Video

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/icesat/

Note: To see this video, go to the above website and click on the second video from the top.

Page 20: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

Conclusion

The ICESat has provided scientists with unprecedentedly accurate data of the

globe’s polar regions. With the addition of a few calibrations the usefulness of its

outputs would grow increasingly.

Page 21: An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen

References

• Abshire, J., et al. (2005), Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on the ICESat Mission: On-orbit measurement performance, Geophysical Research Letter, doi:10.1029/2005GL024028, 1534-1536.

• ICESat (2008). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 05:37, May 7, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICESat&oldid=182396442.

• Luthcke, S. B., D. D. Rowlands, T. A. Williams, and M. Sirota (2005), Reduction of ICESat systematic geolocation errors and the impact on ice sheet elevation change detection, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L21S05, doi:10.1029/2005GL023689.

• Schutz, B. E., H. J. Zwally, C. A. Shuman, D. Hancock, and J. P. DiMarzio (2005), Overview of the ICESat Mission, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L21S01, doi:10.1029/2005GL024009.