Upload
robin-newton
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An update on
Transpacific cables
DISCLAIMER
The content of this presentation does not reflect nor represent the opinion of
America Online, Inc. Let’s keep it short, you know the standard stuff…..
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A
What happened?
•From To•monopoly free market•PTO owned private•members only IRU•WDM DWDM•coast to coast city to city•retail wholesale
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A
A little HistoryThe First cable to Asia, from the Red Sea to India was laid in 1859-1860 but never worked over its full length.
First trans-Pacific telegraph cable was completed in 1902 between the United States and New Zealand.
First Amplified telephone cable, TAT-1 was completed 1955.
After two decades, the first fiber optic cable across the Pacific became operational (TPC-3, in 1988) Soon afterwards it was connected to the Hawaii-4 & Guam-Philippines-Taiwan (GPT) cables, thus completing the 1st digital links across the Pacific.
ALCATEL OALC4 - 17mm Cable
Cables
State of the art cable ships
TSSL’s C.S. Charles Brown
Elements of a Submarine Cable System
Cable Station
Beach Manhole
Land Section
Repeater
Cable
Branching Unit
Network Management
Optical & Transmission Equipment
Power Feed Equipment
undersea cable burying, retrieval,
and repair operations equipment
TSSL’s SCARAB IV ROV
TSSL’s Pacific SCARAB I ROV
Repeaters
• Do not regenerate, amplify
• Erbium-doped fiber amplifier
• Well adapted to WDM
• Up to 8 fiber pairs
• Direct monitoring
3 m
Monitoring the Repeaters
HIGH LOSS LOOP-BACK MODULE
REPEATERSSPACING (d)
Special modulated signal sent from line is looped-back at 1st repeater and return in time T.Signal from 2nd repeater will return in time T+TSignal from 3rd repeater will return in time T+2TT= 2dn/c, where n=index of refraction and c=speed of light
Repeaters spacing
Typical restorable submarine cable system
LS
Subsea
LS
LS
LS PoP
PoP
PoP
PoP
Asia/PacBackhaul
US Backhaul
The WavelengtDivisionMultiplexing technology basics
The WDM technology basics
Single channel in a fiber
WDM is the technique for sending several channels at different colours through the same fibre
Multiple channels in a fiber
Generic DWDM Architecture
To lineSTM-N
From line
DMUX+ ChromaticDispersion
Compensator STM-N
OA OA
Digital SignalProcessingOR
RECEIVE
MuxOT
OA
TRANSMIT
Digital SignalProcessing
DWDM spectrum range
1.0
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
Los
s (d
B/K
m)
1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7
Wavelength (m)
Single mode fiber
1530 to 1565
0
80
160
240
320
400
480
10002000 30004000 50006000 70008000 900010000
1100012000
System Length (km)
Fib
er
pair
cap
acit
y (
Gb
it/s
)DWDM Technology:
Capacity Varies with Length:
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A
Recently Activated Cables
• China-US*
• PC – 1*
• SEA-ME-WE-3
• FLAG Europe-Asia Cable
Future Cables
• Japan-US
• Southern Cross
• OXYGEN
• Asia Pac Cable Network 2
• East Asia Cable
• North Asia Cable
• FLAG Pacific-1
China-US
US
Bandon, OR
San Luis Obispo, CA
CHINA
Chongming
Shantou
GUAM
80 Gbps / 2XSTM-2562.5 Gbps x 8 Wavelengths x 4 Fiber Pairs
JAPAN
Chikura
Okinawa
S. KOREA
Pusan
TAIWAN
Fangshan
RFCS Outlook: Active
Active
16,000 Route miles
Type: Consortium
PC - 1
US
Harbour Pointe, WA
JAPAN
Ajigaura
Initial 160 Gbps capacity, 2.5 Gbps (STM-16) x 8 Wavelengths x 4 fiber pairs(Upgradeable to 640 Gbps using DWDM technology)
Shima
Grover Beach, CA
No. Ring RFCS: In Service
So. Ring RFCS: November 2000Type: Private (Global Crossing)
640 Gbp/s SDH Ring Design
In Service
November 2000
12,600 Route miles
SEA-ME-WE 3
JAPAN
Okinawa
S. KOREA
Keoje
UK
CHINA
Shanghai
Shantou
TAIWAN
Taipei
Toucheng
Fangshan
HONG KONG
Deep Water Bay
PHILIPPINES
Batangas
VIET NAM
Danang
THAILAND
Satun
MALAYSIA
Mersing SINGAPORE
Tuss
Tungku
INDONESIA
Jakarta
Medan
INDIA
Cochin
Munbai
MYANMAR
Pyayyypon
PAKISTANOMAN
U.A.E.
DJIBOUTI
SAUDI ARABIA
TURKEY
CYPRUS
GREECE
FRANCE
PORTUGAL
MORACCO
ITALY
Penang
20 Gbps (STM-128) 2.5 Gbps x 4 Wavelengths x 2 Fiber PairsSubmarine Cable Network
Branch Unit
RFCS Outlook: Active Type: Consortium
EGYPT
Japan-US
JAPAN
Kita-Ibaraki
Maruyama
HAWAII
Makaha Beach, Oahu
US
Manchester, CA
Shima
Moro Bay / San Luis Obispo, CA
640 Gbp/s SDH Ring10 Gbps x16 Wavelengths x 4 Fiber Pairs
12,00 Route miles
RFS: So Ring 2/01
No Ring 5/01
Southern Cross
Branch Unit
USA
Nedonna, OR
San Luis Obispo, CA
HAWAII
Kahe Point
Spencer Beach
NEW ZEALAND
Takapuna
Whenuapal
AUSTRALIA
Belrose, Sidney
Rosebery, Sidney
FIJI
Suva
160 Gbp/s SDH Ring Design
80 Gbp/s SDH Ring Design
Backhaul & cable sys interface: STM-1
November 2000
November 2000
November 2000
January 2001
RFCS Outlook: November 2000
FLAG Pacific-1
RFCS Outlook: 2H02 Type: Private (FLAG Telecom)
JAPAN
Misaki
Chikura
HAWAII
Honolulu
US
Washington
ALASKA
Aleutians
CANADA
Vancouver Is.
Bay Area - North
Bay Area - South
Tokyo / Yokahama Loop
22,000 Route miles
Supplier is Alcatel
10 Gbps x 64 Wavelengths x 8 Fiber Pairs
Repeatered Repeatered
Repeatered
Repeatered
Repeatered
Vancouver / Seattle Loop
San Francisco / Los Angeles
Loop
S. Korea
Pusan
TAIWAN
Toucheua
MALAYSIA
Kuan Tan
JAPAN
Kitaibaraki
Chikura
CHINA
Shanghai
Shantou
SINGAPORE
Katoug
HONG KONG
LantauPHILIPINES
Batangas
2.56 Tbp/s SDH Ring Design
10 Gbps x 64 Wavelengths x 4 Fiber Pairs
ASIA PAC CABLE NETWORK 2___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CABLES FACTS SUMMARY
Cable System RFS Fiber Pair
Initial Wavelengths per Fiber Pair
Wavelengths per Fiber Pair
Gbps per Wavelength
Upgraded Gbps per
WavelengthTotal
CapacityFully Upgraded Total Capacity
APCN February-97 1 2 4 5 5 10 20
FLAG Europe-Asia November-97 2 2 2.5 2.5 10 10Guam-Philippines March-99 2 1 4 2.5 2.5 5 20
SEA-ME-WE-3 September-99 2 4 8 2.5 2.5 20 40Pacific Crossing - 1 December-99 4 2 16 2.5 10 20 640China-US CN January-00 4 8 2.5 2.5 80 80
Japan-US CN February-00 4 8 64 2.5 2.5 80 640
Southern Cross October-00 3 8 16 2.5 2.5 60 160
EAC December-00 4 2 64 10 10 80 2560
North Asian Cable June-01 4 8 64 10 10 320 2560
Australia - Japan July-01 2 4 32 10 10 80 640
SAT-3/WASC/SAFE October-01 2 8 16 2.5 2.5 40 80
805 7450
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A
CABLES PRICING MODELS
Up to spring 1998: Retail T1-E1, T3
1999: Wholesale T3/STM-1 available
everywhere (IRU or Capital Lease +
O&M)
2000: Wholesale STM-4c available
2002: Wavelength (2.5/10Gb) offering?
CABLES PRICES EXAMPLES
Cpacity between Tokyo and the West
Coast
Year data rate Monthly Lease IRU / Capital Lease
1997 E1 54,000$ n.a.
1998 DS3 540,000$ n.a.
1999 DS3 320,000$ n.a.2000 OC3 200,000$ 8,000,000$
CABLES PRICES SUMMARY
O&M Charges are
dropping
drastically
as well
STM-1 O&MCharges pa
1998 350,000$ 1999 250,000$ 2000 108,000$ 2001 62,500$ 2002 30,000$ 2003 15,000$
The Tug of War of the Cost of Cable
For suppliers: The first system to connect bandwidth-starved points may capture sales at a much higher price than when the rest of the bandwidth barons (private or consortium) join in.
For Buyers: The opposite strategy holds true: If you don’t like bandwidth prices now, wait a bit. They will likely change soon enough.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to:
Tyco Submarine System Genuity Global Crossing FLAG
AGENDA
Introduction Technology New Cable Systems Costs Q&A