2
330 S.A. MEDICAL JOURNAL 24 April 1965 SUMMARY A case of acute pancreatitis presenting in diabetic coma in a non-diabetic patient is described. This is an unusual presentation of acute pancreatitis and it carries a high mortality. I wish to thank Dr. M. M. Suzman, under whose care this patient was admitted, and the Medical Superintendent of the Johannesburg General Hospital for permission to publish. I also wish to thank Dr. C. Abrahams for the pathological report. New Appliance REFERENCES 1. Andrews, J. T. (1960): Med. J. Aust., 2, 582. 2. Bell. E. T. (1958): Surgery, 43, 527. 3. Davidson, A. 1. G. (1964): Brit. Med. J .. 1, 356. 4. Fallis. L. S. (l95J): J. Int. Coli. Surg .. 16, 337. 5. Hughes. P. D. (1961): Brit. J. Surg., 49, 90. 6. Joslin, E. P.. Root, H. F .. White, P. and Marble. A. (1959): The Treatment oj Diabetes Melliws. London: Henry Kimpton. 7. Nagler, W. and Taylor, H. (1963): J. Amer. Med. Assoc.. 184, 723. 8. Treece, T. R.. Bures, A. R. and Clark, M. L. (1963): J. Okla. Med. Assoc .. 56, 563. 9. Toffler. A. H. and Spiro. H. M. (1962): Ann. Intern. Med., 57, 655. 10. Tully. G. T. and Lowenthal. J. J. (1958): lbid .. 48, 310. 11. Schumacker, H. B. (1940): Ann. Surg., 112, 177. ANAESTHETIC EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRST 6 MONTHS OF LIFE H. H. SAMSON, M.B.E., M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., Formerly Senior Anaeslhelisl, Johannesburg General Hospilal General anaesthesia for the newborn and infants in the first 6 months of life is potentially more dangerous and difficult to conduct than in the older age groups. It is generally agreed that many of the hazards are inherent in the equipment currently in use. Although the available equipment is suitable for older infants, it does not comply correctly with the physiological and anatomical requirements of small infants. Disadvantages of Exisling Equiprneni Besides being rather cumbersome and difficult to main- tain in position, the chief drawbacks are dead-space and resistance to expiration arising from excessive tubing through which the expired gases have to trave\. To overcome dead-space, high flow rates of gases (these are dry) are used-but the lungs are then subjected to increased pressure from the incoming gases. Another disadvantage of high flow rates is the cost of the anaesthetic due to wastage. This is proportionally high, depending on the cost of the anaesthetic agents. The equipment, designed by myself, conforms to the ventilatory requirements of the very young and overcomes the objections raised above. Principles of New Device Dead-space and resistance have been curtailed to a bare minimum, namely 1·5 m!. The re-breathing tubing seen between thumb and forefinger (A in Fig. 1), is only a few inches in length and its lumen, although considerably reduced, will offer no resistance to the expired gases if re-breathing is permitted. This tubing must not be con- fused with the tubing from the anaesthetic machine which delivers the gases into the bag mount (B in Fig. 1). The 350 - 400 m\. re-breathing bag, the smallest pre- viously available, is replaced by a miniature rubber bag which, in reality, is a balloon with a capacity of approxi- mately 100 m\. It is now comparatively easy to acquire the 'feel' of the patient, namciy, the resistance of the thoracic cage and assess the correct amount of ventilation. The equipment, made of plastic (acrylic-Perspex), is extremely light and simple to handle. It is so compact and small as to fit literally into the palm of the hand. Since dead-space and resistance have been minimized, it is now possible to administer effective and safe anaesthesia with considerably reduced minute-volumes. It is also possible to reduce the cost of the anaesthetic. Indeed, a saving of as much as RI.50 an hour can be effected when agents such nitrous oxide, oxygen and halothane are administered. Fig. 1. See text. A great deal of the improvements can be ascribed to the device (Fig. 2A, 2B) which is used with a face-mask (Fig. I), or with an endotracheal tube (Fig. 3). Fealures The device embodies the following features: 1. Its over-all dead-space is less than t m\. and re- breathing during spontaneous respiration can be prevented with small gas flow rates. 2. The fresh gases enter the vertical limb via the hori- zontal limb and are evenly dispersed (Fig. 2B). There is therefore less hindrance to expiration from the incoming gases than with other devices (Fig. 2C). 3. The mechanism for the escape of gases from the circuit is housed in the upper portion of the vertical limb. It consists of a tap (Fig. 2B) which can be screwed in and

ANAESTHETIC EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRST 6 MONTHS OF LIFE

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

330 S.A. MEDICAL JOURNAL 24 April 1965

SUMMARYA case of acute pancreatitis presenting in diabetic comain a non-diabetic patient is described. This is an unusualpresentation of acute pancreatitis and it carries a highmortality.

I wish to thank Dr. M. M. Suzman, under whose care thispatient was admitted, and the Medical Superintendent of theJohannesburg General Hospital for permission to publish. Ialso wish to thank Dr. C. Abrahams for the pathologicalreport.

New Appliance

REFERENCES

1. Andrews, J. T. (1960): Med. J. Aust., 2, 582.2. Bell. E. T. (1958): Surgery, 43, 527.3. Davidson, A. 1. G. (1964): Brit. Med. J .. 1, 356.4. Fallis. L. S. (l95J): J. Int. Coli. Surg .. 16, 337.5. Hughes. P. D. (1961): Brit. J. Surg., 49, 90.6. Joslin, E. P .. Root, H. F .. White, P. and Marble. A. (1959): The

Treatment oj Diabetes Melliws. London: Henry Kimpton.7. Nagler, W. and Taylor, H. (1963): J. Amer. Med. Assoc .. 184, 723.8. Treece, T. R .. Bures, A. R. and Clark, M. L. (1963): J. Okla. Med.

Assoc .. 56, 563.9. Toffler. A. H. and Spiro. H. M. (1962): Ann. Intern. Med., 57, 655.

10. Tully. G. T. and Lowenthal. J. J. (1958): lbid .. 48, 310.11. Schumacker, H. B. (1940): Ann. Surg., 112, 177.

ANAESTHETIC EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRST 6 MONTHS OF LIFEH. H. SAMSON, M.B.E., M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., Formerly Senior Anaeslhelisl, Johannesburg General Hospilal

General anaesthesia for the newborn and infants in thefirst 6 months of life is potentially more dangerous anddifficult to conduct than in the older age groups. It isgenerally agreed that many of the hazards are inherent inthe equipment currently in use.

Although the available equipment is suitable for olderinfants, it does not comply correctly with the physiologicaland anatomical requirements of small infants.

Disadvantages of Exisling EquiprneniBesides being rather cumbersome and difficult to main­

tain in position, the chief drawbacks are dead-space andresistance to expiration arising from excessive tubingthrough which the expired gases have to trave\.

To overcome dead-space, high flow rates of gases(these are dry) are used-but the lungs are then subjectedto increased pressure from the incoming gases.

Another disadvantage of high flow rates is the cost ofthe anaesthetic due to wastage. This is proportionallyhigh, depending on the cost of the anaesthetic agents.

The equipment, designed by myself, conforms to theventilatory requirements of the very young and overcomesthe objections raised above.

Principles of New DeviceDead-space and resistance have been curtailed to a bare

minimum, namely 1·5 m!. The re-breathing tubing seenbetween thumb and forefinger (A in Fig. 1), is only a fewinches in length and its lumen, although considerablyreduced, will offer no resistance to the expired gases ifre-breathing is permitted. This tubing must not be con­fused with the tubing from the anaesthetic machine whichdelivers the gases into the bag mount (B in Fig. 1).

The 350 - 400 m\. re-breathing bag, the smallest pre­viously available, is replaced by a miniature rubber bagwhich, in reality, is a balloon with a capacity of approxi­mately 100 m\. It is now comparatively easy to acquire the'feel' of the patient, namciy, the resistance of the thoraciccage and assess the correct amount of ventilation.

The equipment, made of plastic (acrylic-Perspex), isextremely light and simple to handle. It is so compactand small as to fit literally into the palm of the hand.

Since dead-space and resistance have been minimized, itis now possible to administer effective and safe anaesthesiawith considerably reduced minute-volumes.

It is also possible to reduce the cost of the anaesthetic.Indeed, a saving of as much as RI.50 an hour can beeffected when agents such a~ nitrous oxide, oxygen andhalothane are administered.

Fig. 1. See text.

A great deal of the improvements can be ascribed tothe device (Fig. 2A, 2B) which is used with a face-mask(Fig. I), or with an endotracheal tube (Fig. 3).

FealuresThe device embodies the following features:

1. Its over-all dead-space is less than t m\. and re­breathing during spontaneous respiration can be preventedwith small gas flow rates.

2. The fresh gases enter the vertical limb via the hori­zontal limb and are evenly dispersed (Fig. 2B). There istherefore less hindrance to expiration from the incominggases than with other devices (Fig. 2C).

3. The mechanism for the escape of gases from thecircuit is housed in the upper portion of the vertical limb.It consists of a tap (Fig. 2B) which can be screwed in and

24 April 1965 S.A. TYDSKRIF VIR GENEESKUNDE 331

out to alter the size of the escape vents. When the latterare fully opened-as they should always be during spon­taneous respiration-no resIstance is offered to the expiredgases as they flow into the ambient atmosphere.

c

Fig. 2. See text.

Fig. 3. See text

Provided the minute-volume is adequate, very little orno air will be sucked through the vents during inspiration.

4. For controlled respiration, the necessary pressure forinsufflating the lungs is obtained by directing more ofthe expired gases to the bag. This is accomplished byscrewing in the tap to restrict their escape through thevents.

As mentioned previously. the tubing connecting thedevice with the bag mount will not offer any resistanceto the recoil of the thoracic cage. It should also beremembered that it is the hand, and not the lungs, whichovercomes the resistance created by the narrowed vents.

5. Aspiration of the lungs can be undertaken duringanaesthesia without having to disconnect the device fromthe endotracheal tube. The tap can be removed and the

aspirating tube fitted over the upper portion of the verticallimb of the device.

The Face-maskot a little of the succe3S of the equipment is due to

the face-mask which is incorporated. The Rendell-BakerSoucek type of face-piece seen in Fig. I is translucent andis undoubtedly the best fitting mask available. especiallyfor neonates. Dead-space \vithin it is negligible. Whilethe 5 ml. in the chimney (unavoidable in a mask using thenew international standard 22 mm. orifice) is practicallycompletely taken up by ,he bush (Fig. 2A) which holdsthe device.

Gas Flow Ra£esSince dead-space and re5istance need not be taken into

consideration. the correct minute-volume which should bedelivered by the anaesthetic machine depends on thefollowing factors:

(a) the tidal volume vf the infant;

(b) the normal rate of respiration for the weight-group;and

(c) whether air is to be prevented from entering thecircuit during spontaneous respiration.

A rough, but practical method of ascertaining the TVof an infant, is to multiply its weight. in pounds, by 3.

Thus, supposing the weight is 6 lb., the TV will beabout 6 x 3 = 18 ml. If the respiration is, say 40 to theminute, the minute-volume to satisfy the infant is 18 x 40,namely, 720 ml. But the inspiratory phase is only one­third of the respiratory cycle. In order, therefore, for thelungs to obtain 18 ml. of the anaesthetic whenever theinfant inhales, the anaesthetic machine must deliver720 x 3 = 2,160 ml. in;o the lumen of the vertical limb.Any amount short of this will be supplemented by airsucked in during inspiration.

In actual practice, a little air diluting the anaestheticmixture is of no consequence. However, a 2-litre minuteflow is ample for an infant of 6 - 8 lb. when a volatilesynergist is used-the volume of its vapour makes goodthe deficit.

COnlrolled RespirationDuring controlled respiration the correct minute-volume

is affected by any leaks. Generally, the larger the endo­tracheal catheter, the fewer the leaks.

In general a slightly higher minute-volume will be neces­sary for controlled respiration than for spontaneous respi­ration, since there is a tendency to hyperventilate.

The danger of CO., arising from re-breathing can bediscounted with adequate minute-volumes and providedrespiration is correctly controlled or assisted, as it shouldalways be.

I wish to thank my colleagues at the Transvaal MemorialHospital for their advice and forbearance and also Prof. J. C.Nicholson, Head of the Department of Anaesthesiology. at theUniversity of the Witwatersrand.

The Photographic Department of the Department of Medi-cine of the Witwatersrand niversity is responsible for theexcellent photographs.

BIBLIOGRAPHYRendell-Baker. L: Personal communication.