Andersons_FractaL_Density_Universal_Theory_New start based on skeptics.doc

7/26/2019 Andersons_FractaL_Density_Universal_Theory_New start based on skeptics.doc

1/41


2/41

I want the reader to walk with me,to fy with me, to see the things

that I see.

Intro WHAT IF THE UNIVERE IINFINITE!

Its a fundamental question that much of society believes haseither already been answered or can never be explained.

[Q]Is the universe infinite and if so what does this mean toour beliefs or more importantly our science?[A]I dont know but I encounter extreme reactions when Itry to explain a possiblejust possiblealternative (Howthings work based entirely on the scenario that theuniverse is infinite!

Understandings:


3/41

Every idea has an origin and interconnects with others.The oldest most fundamental ideas have all the later ideas &associated explanations constructed in layers on top.A start is a fundamental belief within our societies.inite universe scenarios are found in all our written histories and formthe basis of religions & science theories ali!e.To argue against convention is a great challenge and a responsibility tobe as honest and as accurate as possible.

How can you prove that the universe is infinite?Its not easily.We live in a finite world where all the proofs that are attainable arefeatures of this finite world, but is the universe itself infinite; endless

time and endless distance?Definition: inite and infinite are " different entities. inite can neverbecome infinite by adding #$ or doubling and infinite can never becomefinite by halving or subtracting% it remains infinite.The following logic works with this mutually exclusive

definition where the universe can only be finite or infinite.

The ststep is to disprove the current idea or belief that the universe isalmost certainly finite' by pointing to observations that show this current

belief incorrect.!eaning" (y producing a series of arguments that the universe isalmost certainly not finite) I am providing an argument for the infiniteuniverse so that my theory has ground under its feet.The Tool"*rovable testable high school physics and math against thepower of belief'.I start by identifying the difference between #real scienceand a type ofcognitive dissidence% to be called #$unday science.

Real science has testable rules that always apply from Mondaythrough to aturday but unday science is about beliefs and sets

to claim special rules that with dubious physically testable proof

is said to supersede the normal rules of physics.

This approach is to identify ! label" this tool is used on clusters

of ambiguities found around some foundation ideas.

#ere is the $stexample of unday science to do with the belief

of a start to the universe. It%s a classic that we have all heard.


4/41

&rom Monday to aturday you absolutely can%t get something

out of nothing but on unday' miracle day' you are expected to

believe a whole universe came out of nothing and nowhere and

no time. (es it%s a cheap shot but)

These are directly opposing concepts" to believe both that it is

impossible to get something out of nothing and at the same

time believing that everything came out of nothing.

It%s called cognitive dissidence and when another $* examples

are added +all to do with a start, it becomes less of a -oke for mostpeople. It h"rts them#$

/et%s be plain0 1onvention is using concepts where #ydrogen

fuels the stars and concepts where fundamental particles ! fuelcame from a beginning" a start' a 2ero hour.

These concepts are embedded in all the ideas built upon them'

directly or indirectly) Many of the ideas that are built upon them

are directly called science.

Remember the theory being offered is entirely built upon the

scenario that the universe is infinite so that it is subtly different

than convention starting at this foundation level.

#ere are 3 4uick unday science arguments involving big bang.

$stanti (+bang argument+separating o%&ects,If you have an ob-ect a meter to you right and an ob-ect a meter

to your left the 5 ob-ects are approx 5 meters apart.

If you observe a star $6 Light Years to you right ! another

$6/(s to your left' you can say that $6 years ago they were

separated by approx 57 /(s.

If you observe galaxies $6 8illion /(s to both your right ! left

you can say $6 8 years ago they had approx 57 8 light years

separation.

If you assume they were once together' how long does it take to

get 578 /(s separation9 It%s a 5 trains leaving a station high

school maths or physics type 4uestion.http0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:#ubble;


5/41

=sing the distance light travels in a year > $ /( ! a best

possible situation with us in the center of expansion rather than

over one side or off in a poky corner" try to -ustify a $6 ? 5@

billion year ago start or fuel source argument' to match current

science beliefs of fuel usage.

(es there are official explanations but you can%t do it without a

magical time space warp with us in the center.

8ut people say there%s proof" lets look a little harder.

"ndanti (+bang argument+'o'entu' ( inertia, builds on $stargumentIf you believe that the universe was once s4uee2ed down so that

it fit into a single point or something very small' then surely it

would have been very dense and massive due to the same mass

being in a decreased volume.

omething that is very massive and dense' expanding from a

central point is expected within normal physics to have

momentum" meaning' that a sample volume moving in a

particular direction at a particular velocity will continue to move

in that direction and velocity unless another force acts upon it.


6/41

-th Anti (+bang argument +Ther'o dyna'ics and e)pandingvolu'es*this applies to energy or mass per any cubic volume.A barbeque bottle rapidly cools as the gas is allowed to expand

causing frost./ass & energy01ou get it23The original 8ig bang concepts limit volumes of mass ! energy

to what came out of the singularity day $.

The volume of a sphere increases at a geometric rate relative to

any increase of the radius and the density of a volume decreases

inversely relative to the volume increase. +$ : volume, Chen a

radius is already large +$68 /(s, even small increases of radius

of a few Ds affect the volume and therefore density massively.

ome official representations are that not only is the universe

expanding but the rate of expansion is increasing.

Ebservations of density and spacing of stars and galaxies

absolutely contradict and disprove the expanding universe

belief.

The B4il!inson microwave mapCFMGH% microwave survey of theperceivable universe shows an average consistent density to the

limits of the e4uipments range of $@ F $ billion light years in

every direction. http0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:#ubble;


7/41

6thAnti (+bang argument++ights red shift ( ,oppler fre-uency shiftare not the same thing but its common belief that they are.This may ta!e several steps to explain3$ /ight is now officially described as a particle wave or as an

energy packet under the general title of Hhotons. Hhotons are

dense high fre4uency particle waveforms emitted from the outer

shells of atoms and red is a lower fre4uency photon than blue.

5 Gs an atom is heated its emissions of photons

increase both in Baverage fre4uency of the

photons% and in Bnumbers of photons emitted%"

there is no set time or spacing between the

emission of one photon and the next' thefre4uency is an internal part of the photon.

In our scale we heat each element and find they

each have very distinct signatures in a

multitude of different waveforms.

6 This signatureis used to identify elements in distant stars andgalaxies by looking at their light spectra.

It is noted that the more distant a star or galaxy' the more thesignatures lose fre4uency as a whole. The phenomenon is

known as Red hift. There are 5 opposing theories.

$ The concept known as old light theory represents

degeneration ! a seeing limit' where Bphotons% emitted as

ultraviolet +high fre4uency, have degenerated +lost energy ! fre4uency, and

represent a limit when their fre4uency drops to below waveform

sustainability level' somewhere below Infra red.

5 There is common support for another theory to explain thisfre4uency loss based on


8/41

and circumstances in which it was formed than a photon and is

4uite different in physical natures including si2e' density !

nature of fre4uency. It%s important.

J.g. G smoke ring moves as a particle while actually being a

waveform. G smoke ring is not a compression wave like sound

or a shock wave' nor like displacement waves as seen on the

surface of our lakes and oceans. Jach type of waveform is

different and has a particular discrete cause of origin. G particle

wave cycles internally and usually has multiple internal axes.

The energy of a particle wave is contained within components

represented as its fre4uency. &or a particle wave loss of

fre4uency is the same as the loss of energy.

In our physical experiments a red photon contains less energy

than a blue or ultra violet photon. Cithout citing special

circumstances where it doesn%t" light will generally degenerate

at an even rate away from its source of emission" meaning that

the energy particle waveforms will lose fre4uency. This does not

mean that the sources of the photons are moving away from us.

3. 7opplerfre4uency loss is something else.

The standard example is of a rail crossing bellwhere the bell is ringing with repetition. ound is

a compression type waveform. Gs you approach

the bell the combined velocities result in an

increased fre4uency that you hear a waveform

pass and travelling away from the bell results in a

slower decreased fre4uency crossing of the sound

compression waves. It%s a combination of the emitter and

receiver%s movement plus the movement of the medium.Hhotons don%t normally have an even spacing

or matching fre4uencies between the one in

front or the one behind due to the cause and

circumstances of their emission.

Hhotons don%t change fre4uency based on direction and all travel

about the same speed in the medium of free space regardless of

fre4uency.


9/41


10/41

;ld light theory and 7oppler red shift theory are theories thatconflict ! contradict each other. Eld light represents the

degrading of the waveform as a loss of energy in the waveform

over time. +Totally expected after $@ ? $3 billion years of travel,

If it has a start its finite and expected to have losses ! entropy.

Chile more Bmodern


11/41

Another $- examples here wont change beliefs as they ta!e time butthese initial examples should be enough to =ustify exploring the offeredalternative and how it fits into an infinite universe.

The following sections proceed as if the infinite universe hypothesis isaccepted and explores the Anderson fractal density theory of theuniverse' and the implications of an infinite universe to conventionaladvanced science.

This is a series of ideas ta!en from multiple disciplines used to expressa relatively simple vision.

This is not a common vision and will be fresh to most readers.

>emember0A flat earth' & the earth at the center of the universe' & the universehaving a start'% are an ego set.4arning0 >eading this text may cause irreversible contamination by alternative ideas causing%headaches) migraines) yelling fits) hair loss) nose bleeds) stomach cramps) heart attac!s) aneurysms) plagues war and loss of sense ofhumour and $ or " enlightenments.The author !nows of no other theories about possible mechanisms for the universe that are based entirely on the infinite universe hypotheses.

Chapter 1

This exploration is unmarked unmapped territory for most readers.8ommon landmar!s & way points need to be established.This model did not start in cosmology% it started in advanced electrical

wave theories and shifted when some unusual visuali:ations of themath associating it to the real world were found.


12/41

These visuali:ations are a blend of geometry) statistical influences anda number of concepts within ?ame Theory & 8haos Theory & conceptsof fractal pattern causes. %on&t 'ani(.4e see these things in our daily lives and this collection of ideas are

=ust a way of explaining them.

The first steps to @understanding are visuali:ations that allow the mathto have =ustification within the visuali:ation. A mental image of what isbeing discussed sets the rules of whats applicable in the form of maths later3.

Analogies are real world examples used to visuali:e something that istoo big or too small to see.Analogies form part of our belief structures at the basic visuali:ations

level. 8onvention has its own set of analogies that lead to all therefined standard conclusions. /ost of us originally learnt from them.To circumvent this cross tal!% this model uses its own analogies whereever possible. The analogies chosen wor! together) expressing theinfluences of pattern structures that span scales across an infinitedistance & time universe. 4here% electromagnetic waveforms) layer toform pattern structures and concentrations in scale.

This model is so different from convention it requires a lot of little stepsas if you were learning li!e a child.

The next " subheadings are abstracts to give a feel of @direction that

the analogies and descriptions will then fill out with understanding.

hat is an infinite universe ( what are the pro%le's?

Infinite in this context means no start or end in time and no end indistance Absolutely no end no outside) =ust endless.


13/41

Its mind boggling and the author doesnt pretend to comprehend theshear mind warping immensity of the statement but there are logicsthat can be followedAn infinite universe requires balances in regards to time duration that afinite universe never has to contend with.A finite universe can have a fuel turn up at the beginning BA fuel musthave a source) a rate of consumption and a time after when theproducts have dispersed.C An infinite universe would need to point tothe fuel truc! to =ustify a continued existence if a fuel concept was usedfor the operation of stars or atoms.An infinite universe obviously cant use fundamental particles from abeginning either. 4ithin the conventional @big bang finite universe

concepts) all matter is made from fundamental particles that came froman event $.3 Another explanation for cause of matter is required.Dayer after layer as the ideas build up they can change our perceptionof how the universe wor!s by quite a margin. I say this after researching the idea for along time.

A sample example04hile convention perceives the universe as being made from (oson

5iggs particles the smallest most fundamental particles3 that camefrom a start% the perception of this model is that the smallest densestparts of the universe are being created and maintained by largerpattern structures and supporting energy densities.Abstractly this is li!e saying that there is no @one si:e fits all) (oson5iggs particle') that the smallest waveform or densest waveform will besmaller & denser in a heavy element than in a light element li!e5ydrogen.

Energy being concentrated and dispersed bac! to bac!ground levels ispart of the equilibrium required by an infinite universe between orderand chaos. 8oncepts li!e entropy and fuel do not fit @ in standard form

within an infinite universe.

/nergy and 'anifestations

The word @energy is used in convention to describe heat & electricity orwaves & energy particles or potentials & !inetic moving mass etc but


14/41

these are each scale dependent understandings that will be coveredfurther on within the model. 4hat 4here 5owThis model is based on rotating structures that have subsets of rotatingpattern structures within them.[A fractal pattern concept]The subset structures have further substructures within them) down inscale to a point where limits are reached and there is no furtherrepeating of the pattern.There are certain advantages of loo!ing at the problem using mathconcepts associated with @pattern.@*attern or at least the @pattern of nature follows rules @obviously% thismodel uses only a few parts out of well !nown theories that relate to@pattern and the crossing of scales) to explain what natures rules are.

EAD0 The types of patterns described are all real world) caused byreal world forces% numerous examples will be provided) their generalrules will be explained.

?enerally the forces that are being described in child analogy form arestresses of electromagnetic space that have shape and geometricinfluences to movement.In large scales these forces represent huge volumes with low densityand in small scales they represent small volumes with high density.


15/41

Energy at its very most fundamental level is every electromagneticwiggle or wobble) any scale'."pace#


16/41

Chapter 2

0asic pre'ise" Energy is stress on space% & at its most basic level is everyelectromagnetic wiggle or wobble% any scale and the stress it causes to

the surrounding space.This model explains that all matter and mass &!'!()T*+/ is madefrom compressed and fractally concentrated energy.To have @mass or inertia assigned to a volume the energy within thatvolume must be denser than the energy in the surrounding volumes.In this model the energy ta!es on an equivalent to the math conceptcalled fractal roughness. Its a movement in scale.+4aveforms have a volume of space that they occupy from moment tomoment.8rossings of electromagnetic waveforms through a volume of space%represents an increase of energy to that volume for that moment) themore crossings the greater the representation of energy in that volumefor that moment.Energy must move to be energy and one of the directions of movementis scale through becoming denser or less dense waveforms.4hen energy moves) li!e all movement the movement is relative tosomething else.(etween these " representations of movement is a volume thatcontains the differences in movement) the differential'.The differential is more concentrated than the " individual relativeforces that it sits between.It is going to be explained that differentials can act as filters or barriersor wave guide conduits to other energy movement.7ifferentials interact with their local environments continuously.The effect of barriers can isolate volumes.

Individual axes each add to order and concentration./ovement around any axis causes differentials of its own.

Time for some analogies and thought arguments%+


17/41


18/41

Thought e)peri'ent

This explanation plays the ame of identifyin where the mass is andits relationship to scale.1ou loo! out to our observable universe with its conceivable radius inexcess of 6F billion light years and as! yourself @where is the mass or@where is dense2 The numbers are probably wrong but dont get side trac!ed3The first perception is that the billions of galaxies are denser than therest of the large volume of space.Doo!ing at any one of these galaxies of the billions that we can see) theperception is that the galaxy is made up of dense bits and a ratherlarge volume of un+dense or empty space.4ithin a single solar system of the billions in that galaxy) the scale that

we perceive matter3) we see the - states of matter% solids) liquids)gasses and energy plasmas% and we see a vast quantity of emptyspace.Even within perceptions of matter we have molecules with empty spaceand atoms with empty space.Each scale from largest to smallest had this component that isapparently GGH or more of empty space reducing the average apparent

density when viewing that scale.

Each scale chose only one point of density to examine from many thesame) so that each scale you go smaller the average densityperception changes in fractal steps.

4ithin the scale of our perceived universe the galaxies were the densepatterns) within a galaxy the solar systems were dense patterns and

within matter eventually you get to the atoms) always with a perceptionthat the rest was GG.GH something empty space but with densepatterns or mass within. The dense bits didnt get denser so much asthey got closer together. Electron mass) Electron volts3This is the $st part of a base understanding behind the concept offractal density.

Fractal density explanation


19/41

Thought e)peri'ent 1called

5old out your hand palm up.I'agine that you hold in your hand an i'aginary %loc23The corner of this bloc! represents the conventional perceptions of the, dimensions% ) 1 & J.This imaginary bloc! can have these dimensions vary from almostinfinitely small to almost infinitely large.4hat ma!es this bloc! imaginary is that it is missing the variable -thdimension of fractal density.Any difference in density between the @density of the inside verses theoutside ma!es the volume real.7ensity is the $st variable dimension that turns something that isimaginary into something that is real.oting per thought experiment $ that all density is fractal and based onperceptions of scale.

If you regard the dimensions as @) 1 & J or width) height & depth then%+ without a density or a difference in relative densities + none of the first, dimensions has meaning in a real world.

7imensions are variable% density is variable) while time Bwhich is oftencalled the -thdimensionC is a non variable continuance where we usematching identical increments to identify the rate of change of our

world.To avoid confusion0 )1)J & Time defines a location in a framewor!

where the )1)J & time are all specific to that framewor!) while )1)J &fractal enery densitycreates a label that defines a @particular volume.Time is then a rate of change to all the variable dimensions of that

volume.Time does not change across scale but rate of change to the variabledimensions does. >ate of change increases in smaller scales.

In this model matter is made from energy that is compressed.Energy is any wiggle wobble stress or movement within space.8oncentration of energy is done by energy moving within naturalpattern structures.

The4thdimension


20/41

It is the geometry of the structures and the movement that causes andallows the concentration.?ravity is one of the side effects of this concentration as is the solutionfor why stars seem to burn but I get ahead of myself.There are a few steps between electromagnetic wiggles in space andapples hitting you in the head.

+ets start with #the e'pty space isnt e'pty4


21/41

convention to be electromagnetic waveforms. This model argues thatthey are.

4ith a model this alternative it is necessary to constantly bind it bac! to reality.

I IT< >EADEvery waveform has a cause) @a particular set of conditions thatgenerate that particular type of waveform.Each waveform has a start and therefore a life expectancy.The life expectancy is influenced by the efficiency of the waveform type

within a fractally dense) ever changing energy medium.

4hen a waveform disperses so that its pattern finally brea!s down the

remaining energy becomes bac!ground energy.I repeat0 Energy being concentrated and dispersed bac! to bac!groundlevels is part of the equilibrium required by an infinite universe betweenorder and chaos.

urther ahead in chapter , are math concepts that develop the next setof visual descriptions of fundamental energy and fundamental space.This model offers that there are a finite number of common types ofmovement and that they all can be represented within concepts ofstress on space and pattern that has a fractal depth.

&ractal energy pattern structures can be made and destroyed and fit within the infinite

universe concept easily without re4uiring a fundamental start or creation event and

without breaching conservation of energy perceptions.


22/41

Chapter 2 continued/6/789 in 5ATT/76,escriptions

Thought experiments 3 & 43 Ta2e : sa'ples of space cu%ic 'eter in each"@The $stfrom L ways between this galaxy and the next) the "ndfrom ourmagnetosphere and the ,rdfrom L way between mercury and the sun.Each of these samples has a different energy density% that is how muchenergy is passing through or contained within it in a given moment.4hat are you measuring2 1ou are measuring electromagnetic

waveforms that have interference patterns that range from smaller thannanometres to larger than light years. The average density of the

waveforms determines how much energy is in that volume relative toany other volume.


23/41

Energy descriptions Qualities of spaceSub analogy 1Imagine a stretchy sheet suspended in space.1ou push one side of it and it bulges out the other way and tries tospring bac!./ost peoples imaginings will be based on our matter level scales buttry imagining the volume of space that contains the stretchy sheet assmaller than an atom and larger than a galaxy and then include all thescales in+between at the same time and all directions too.


24/41

$u% analogy :;Imagine a soft blanket on a polished floorelease the blan!et and it spreadsbac! out.The more ordered the folding in the center the more it can becompressed and resist springing bac!. 8omplex patterns of densemoving energy resist changeN

*icture source ?oogle images0This computer generated image isused in this model as a visual aid

to the concept that compression ofspace at places of concentrationresults in a finer detail to space.

The blan!et analogy is offering thatwhen the blan!et is all scrunchedup it represents a greater density of blan!et per volume and whenrelaxed it has a decreased density of blan!et per volume.


25/41

$o'e final understandings and warning clarificationsIt ta2es a %it to e)plain so'e of these ideas %ut so'eti'es it isalso i'portant to e)plain what is not %eing said.$orting realities = #The !andel%rot $ethttp0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:Mandelbrot;set

f+N, > N5O 1

This is the classic form of a fractal equation% they become morecomplex.The solution is fed bac! into the equation giving a logarithmic growth ordecline.The standard expressions of the equation courtesy of 4i!ipedia' are$3 a colori:ed visual endless :oom "3 a mathematical relationship

version and ,3 a plot onto a sphere.

$ 5 6

6ote"4hile each has valid fractal concepts within0 seriously they doN

These are not representations that this 'odel would choose touse to represent real world fractals.This fractal model doesnt use endless scale li!e the conventionalrepresentation $3 it recogni:es different & more3 mathematicalrelationships to the physical world than example "3 and does not !nowof any real world connection to =ustify plotting the whole set onto asingle' sphere. The ideas that this model uses are subtly different butthe fundamental concepts are still fractal. These ideas will all be re

expressed with pictures shortly.

This model is using an energy description where the energy contains Ois electromagnetic movement without the movement it ceases to beenergy3 so to move within a limited finite3 volume of a pattern3 and to!eep moving in an efficient manner it is bound to the geometry thatallows this efficiency of movement.4ith the added perception that density is a dimension) one of the

directions of movement can be described as expansion or contraction)compression or release3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_sethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set


26/41

6ote">otation does not =ust happen in circles% its more complicatedthan that. ;fficially @Energy out must equal @energy in & visa versa aspart of the flow of energy movement.This does not mean that @energy in will be of the same volume as@energy out.Energy out is usually more fractally dense ractally rough3 than theenergy in.ractal roughness of energy is being expressed as energy density%

where a volume has an average density within. The average is amixture of the dense and less dense and where the dense and un+dense bits form as patterns with rules.

This model uses an analogy called @>ed sine wave in abox% the box is a volume and the sine wave representsa unit quantity of energy.If the box si:e is ad=ustable% when its small its dense and when itslarge its less dense but the quantity of energy doesnt change.The idea thats being offered is that a large red sine wave contains thesame energy as smaller faster moving waves and visa versa. Thehigher the frequency the more fractally dense the waveform is relative

to the volume.This can be expressed in a number of steps using visual mind typeanalogies and will be seen throughout the model to develop & embedthe idea.

>ollowing this warning% the sine wave itself is an analogy of energythat covers ,PQo degrees and represents some form of quantifiablequantity.$ unit) a hundred units) a thousand units etc.3

ther li'its within this analogyThe sine wave concept requires a wave or a series of complete waves

to fit the box. o part waves allowedN The wave represents a cycle of

Carning0 The big red sine wavein a box is an analogy that gets used a lot within

this model 8=T is not meant to have any real world counterpart.

It is an idea' a graph' a visual tool analogy only)


27/41

movement while a part wave represents a brea!down in the cycle orpattern.


28/41

Chapter 3

(E= GRJ #JRJ on the planet earth Doo! out the window or geton the net and you will find endless examples of branching patterns or

rotating patterns etc% physical patterns that you can see) that you canpoint atNThis first part is less about the physical forces that cause the patternsthat appear in many different media with many different perceivedcauses3 and more about the fact that these patterns ta!e the samegeneral form again and again.

/ath can be used as a way of defining the rules that these patterns

generally obey.Two subtlety different perceptionsare $3 concept of forces asinfluences where there arepotentially an infinite number offorces within many related scalesor "3 real world math influences inpattern where there are a finite

number of potential outcomes.

This satellite photo shows snow covered mountains and theconcentration of the water flow as it moves to the larger water body.

A standard approach might try to describe sets of physical forces.8all them influences Each of these is an influence3The angle of the land relative to gravity $ and the volume of collected

water ") result in velocities of flow which ma!es a ,

rd

influence and thenature of the soils a -th influence and then foliage as a 6th influence.Even the differences in relative density between air and water ortemperature are a perception of an influence to the detail of the pattern.rom this approach the more separate influences that you can isolateand quantify the more accurate your equation can potentially become.Initially as you add these influences the equation improves accuracy inlarge steps but as the equation becomes larger the influences ma!eless difference to the whole.

This models math patterns that tie !ith nature


29/41

The individual relationships between the influences also requires a mapor some sort of defining description leading to very complicated multilayered equations.Kp until the $GPQs this was the main approach but it had certain limits%the equations were wor!ed out on paper with slide rules and tableboo!s. Electronic calculators and some computers helped a bit but theequations of this approach become unwieldy.There are a number of approaches toward simplification% you can limitthe influences that you ta!e into account and groups of influences canbe combined etc.


30/41

. >ractal conceptsA clever guy named (enoit /andelbrot explored a concept !nown as afractal.A simpleSish equation'% where the product is repeatedly fed bac! intoparts of the equation) creating ever increasing complexity.1G/JAThese equations usually ta!e the general form of0f +N, > N5O 1 orsome form of similar equation that can range into advancedpolynomials 7ont worry there isnt a test afterwards3

;ne of the advancements that /andelbrot made was the concept offractal pattern roughness' also!nown as ractal dimension'.

This picture is a commonrepresentationote0 In the real world R6 cannever become R+infinity.

In the real world versions of this concept a tree will only branch Rnumber of times between the trun! and the tips of the leaves.

There are always real world pattern limitsfor any pattern that you can see.*atterns li!e the @concentration tree andbranch patterns) rotational eddies and torus movement patterns etcappear on multiple scales and in multiple environments but always

within sets of limits% biggest to smallest) densest to least denseroughness'.

1. @haos theory8oncept0 1ou have order and chaos as two extremes with anundefined grey area interacting in+between.4ho can define where chaos becomes order or order becomes chaos3The math of interaction is simplified to - types.BA math accelerating toward (C) BA math decelerating toward (C) BAmath moving at a steady state toward (C or BA math oscillating in arange between A & (C


31/41

The same math concepts happen between ( & A it mostly doesntmatter which is which.8haos theory combines with fractal concepts where within a patternboth order and chaos exist simultaneously and where order can befound within chaos and chaos found within the ordered.8haos math is simplified math where normal math becomesoverwhelmed 8haos math handles scale change perceptions moreeasily.


32/41

4here concepts of the @nature of pattern sets rules that cause sub+patterns to form or not form3 but where there is a limited number ofcandidates for each circumstance.

>eal world means pattern components that can be pointed at.4ithin math there are a potentially infinite number of patterns &sequences that could be created all very pretty3 but within the real

world there are relatively few finite3 patterns and !nown mathsequences that actually match reality for real world reasons3.

The concept of the pattern' is that the pattern is the end result ofenergy movement where the simple patterns formed are the most

efficient movement) in those particular ever changing circumstances3.B>emember that @fractal density is not normally considered a variabledimension affecting the conventional math approachesCThe pattern' exists in ranges because the forces that ma!e thepatterns also exist within sets of ranges with limits.$owhen you loo!ed out the window or on the internet all the examplesof all the patterns that you find will exist within a physical range of si:esthat can be categori:ed into scales biggest to smallest' version of that

pattern in that scale.This concept can be applied to the largest or smallest !nown starsgalaxies or atoms.An advanced way of loo!ing at it is% largest raindrop to the smallest) thelargest tree) river) ant) human versus the smallest. 4e can be seen aspatterns with fractal sub+patterns within.3

:.B !ath $e-uences and 5atterns with fractal opti'u's and li'its

>eferences0The &ibonacci se4uence

http0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:&ibonacci;number

Patural logarithms

https0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:Patural;logarithm

Mandelbrot et

http0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:Mandelbrot;set
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_numberhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_sethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_numberhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set


33/41

PET G// patterns form a rhythm some patterns don%t even

repeat

or example within math% *rimes are an example of a subset ofnumbers that produce uneven sequences that dont repeat. *rimes areexplored within doubling and tripling concepts within waveforms3*rimes can be shown to have a strong influence within natural patternconcepts They demand a dedicated section3

There are also a number of other sequences in math that match muchof the real world perceptions of life and death.These mathematical sequences appear in natures patterns again andagain but the cause is less distinct in

the conventional descriptions of thenature of the universe.This model is lin!ing a geometrybased understanding to all themathematical sequences that appearin the real world.If it can be pointed at and appearsagain and again) its realN

"ource Wiki/ 1ellow 8hamomilehead showing the arrangement in "$blue3 and $, aqua3 spirals.


34/41

The >i%onacci se-uencehttp0::en.wikipedia.org:wiki:&ibonacci;number'Q) $) $) ") ,) 6) F) $,) "$) ,-) 66) FG) $--) ",,) ,) P$Q) GF) $6GThe sequence starts with Q & $ and each subsequent number is thesum of the previous two./athematically this is expressed as0&n> &nF$ O &n? 5with seed values of&@> @' &$> $

The ibonacci equation is a type of fractal equation due to the resultbeing fed bac! into the equation perception.The !ey understanding offered by 4i!i is that the equation' matchesan optimum layout for the florets% thats a physical geometricaloptimum.

The ibonacci sequence is irrational meaning endless) while thenatural patterns that these optimums match are all very finite) thepatterns exist within limited sets that only repeat a certain number oftimes.As also mentioned in the 4i!i) the ibonacci sequence equationmatches an ideali:ed honeybee population growth% this is for totallydifferent reasons than the geometric optimum found elsewhere. Thepoint is that the equation matches reality sometimes for specific

reasons rather than reality somehow matching the equation because ofsome super special+ness to do with the equation.

ote0


35/41

o two of the above spirals has the same set of causes but all areclassed within math as logarithmic spirals.


36/41

atural logarithms don4t currently form part of this theorybut anunderstanding of the nature of the math is thought an advantage.

In5) or loge5 eis a constant that approximatelyequals ".$F"F$F"Feis an endless number a calculated number3

The graph is f(! " e eto the power ofx;fficially as x approaches :ero y approaches

negative infinity and as x grows it is perceived to approach a positiveinfinity.*atterns have limits unli!e cumulative interest) the std. use3

The equation of eto the power ofxproduces asequence that expands as it gets larger orcontracts as it gets smaller logarithmic3The sequence can be expressed as =ust numbersor linier form li!e the graph or around a circle@numerous ways including the spirals.;r plotted across the >eal and Imaginaryaxes C

The complex plain pictures eInx#y33 JXBImInx#y33C JXBInx#y3C uperposition of the previous 6 graphs


37/41

5

$

xF = IPQJRJ and SJEMJTR(BThe physical understanding of the mathC

The Inverse


38/41

This 'odel offers only one physical e)ception to this law and thatis when there is a %arrier %etween the source of the stress onspace and the place of 'easure'ent.

This e)ception is used as part of the alternative in this 'odel fornot having a funda'ental strong ato'ic force.urther explanation0 This model doesnt use the conventional positivenegative concepts' which were the original =ustification for the strongatomic force.

This 'odel uses the interactive forces associated with thedifferentials caused %y concentrated energy that is rotating

around e)tre'ely s'all radius a)is D e)tre'ely high nu'%ers ofrotations per nano second.These forces are going to %e descri%ed as leading to shear in the'ove'ent of the energyE leading to F %arriers to 'ove'ent inparticular directions to wavelengths outside of certain ranges.These are considered ;real co'ponents< that have physicalvolu'es. olu'es with types of 'ove'ent that can %e drawnEdescri%ed and 'ost i'portantly ;%e pointed at< with cause and

effect descriptions.ithin descriptions of ato's ;the ele'ents


39/41

here the pattern is 'ade fro' 'oving energy.here density and 'atter for' at places of highest stress fro' alarger scale interaction.

Introduction to prime number influences within waveforms0Thought concepts'

*art $If you draw a line with the numbers $ to $QQ on it.

B$)"),)-)6)P))F)G)$Q)$$)$")$,)$-)$6)$P)$)$F)$G)"Q)"$)"")",)"-)"6)"P)")"F)"G),Q,$,",,,-,6,P,,F,G-Q-$-$-,---6--F-G6Q$QQC

L of the numbers are divisible by " 7raw a sine wave that oscillatesthrough every "ndnumber.;f the $QQ% $O, are divisible by , 7raw a sine wave through thesenumbers.ote that every "ndnumber divisible by , is also divisible by ".7raw your sine wave through every - th) 6thPth thetc number until youreach 6Q. 6Q is L way of a single sine wave reaching $QQ3

+oo2ing at what you have drawn0Imagine that the $ to $QQ line represents a distance called thefundamental.Each number has at least one line running through it) most have manycrossings.

The numbers that only have one crossing are the prime numbers.The numbers with only , crossings are caused by prime number timesprime number' and therefore have no other multiples.

umbers that are divisible by both " & , have the greatest number ofcrossings.


40/41

*art "In the sine wave in a box analogy the $QQ serves as the total distanceso cancel out the series that dont have a crossing at $QQ

ote that the spaces or gaps between prime numbers are alsospacings of primes.This model incorporates both layers

5ositives ( 6egatives = 5rotons ( /lectronsThe tool of


41/41

the $*3@s but by then the Hrotons Peutrons and of course Jlectrons were firmly

placed characters.

The 8ohr model is embedded in the culture of physics' electricity and chemistry'

whether people are aware of it or not.

Chen measuring electricity' we are measuring the strength of a magnetic field given

off by an energy flow' F no electron count' same with lightening etc. Ce don%t count'we calculate based on what we already know)

Chen discoveries are made it seems natural to describe them in ways that we know.

8y the action of this or that .

Documents

Andersons_FractaL_Density_Universal_Theory_New start based on skeptics.doc