Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ANNEX III
RESULTS OF PCM WORKSHOP
i
The Feasibility Studyon
Integrated Agricultural and Rural Developmentin
Highland Area in the Republic of Indonesia
ANNEX III RESULTS OF PCM WORKSHOP
Table of Contents
Page
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. III-1
Chapter 2 OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY................................................ III-2
2.1 Objectives .................................................................................................... III-2
2.2 Methodology ................................................................................................ III-2
2.2.1 Program of PCM Workshop ............................................................ III-2
2.2.2 Participants of Village PCM Workshop ........................................... III-2
2.2.3 Moderator and Co-moderator ......................................................... III-3
Chapter 3 RESULTS OF PCM WORKSHOP......................................................... III-4
3.1 Participation Analysis .................................................................................. III-4
3.2 Problem Analysis ......................................................................................... III-4
3.3 Objective Analysis and Identification of Project Approaches ....................... III-6
3.4 Selection of Project Approaches ................................................................... III-6
3.5 Preparation of PDM ..................................................................................... III-7
ii
List of Tables
Table III-1 List of Participants and Observers in Village PCM Workshop........... T-III-1
Table III-2 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inMekarjaya (PDM) ........................................................................... T-III-5
Table III-3 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inLangensari (PDM)............................................................................ T-III-6
Table III-4 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inTugumukti (PDM) ............................................................................ T-III-7
Table III-5 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inGekbrong (PDM).............................................................................. T-III-8
Table III-6 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inCisurupan (PDM) ............................................................................. T-III-9
Table III-7 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inTanjungkarya (PDM).......................................................................T-III-10
Table III-8 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inMekarmukti (PDM).........................................................................T-III-11
Table III-9 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project inCisantana (PDM).............................................................................T-III-12
List of Figures
Figure III-1 Program of PCM Workshop...............................................................F-III-1
Figure III-2 Participation Analysis - People, Groups, OrganizationsRelated to Agricultural Production Activities.....................................F-III-2
Figure III-3 Participation Analysis - Characteristics and Problems ofAgriculture ........................................................................................F-III-6
Figure III-4 Problem Tree in Mekarjaya................................................................F-III-9
Figure III-5 Problem Tree in Langensari.............................................................F-III-10
Figure III-6 Problem Tree in Tugumukti .............................................................F-III-11
Figure III-7 Problem Tree in Gekbrong...............................................................F-III-12
Figure III-8 Problem Tree in Cisurupan ..............................................................F-III-13
Figure III-9 Problem Tree in Tanjungkarya.........................................................F-III-14
Figure III-10 Problem Tree in Mekarmukti...........................................................F-III-15
Figure III-11 Problem Tree in Cisantana...............................................................F-III-16
Figure III-12 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inMekarjaya .......................................................................................F-III-17
Figure III-13 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inLangensari.......................................................................................F-III-18
Figure III-14 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inTugumukti.......................................................................................F-III-19
Figure III-15 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inGekbrong ........................................................................................F-III-20
iii
Figure III-16 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inCisurupan........................................................................................F-III-21
Figure III-17 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inTanjungkarya...................................................................................F-III-22
Figure III-18 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inMekarmukti.....................................................................................F-III-23
Figure III-19 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches inCisantana.........................................................................................F-III-24
III - 1
CHAPTER 1 INTORODUCTION
The Project Cycle Management (PCM) method has been applied to the project
planning process with a view to formulating the project based on participatory
approach. In accordance with the concept of participatory planning of PCM, the
village PCM workshop was held at each model area inviting farmers living there.
In the workshop, three steps of analysis, i.e. “participation analysis”, “problem
analysis” and “objective analysis” were made together with farmers.
All important information from the village PCM workshop was examined in the
next step of “alternative analysis” for identification of project approaches. In the
final step, the Project Design Matrix (PDM) was prepared for each model area.
The analyses in the latter two steps were carried out in cooperation with the
counterpart team.
This Annex presents all the important results of the PCM related studies which
were carried out in the First Stage Study period in Indonesia from the end of
September to the beginning of December 1999. In Chapter 2, the objectives and
methodology of the PCM workshop are described. In Chapter 3, the results of
PCM workshops are explained including the problem trees and objective trees
analyzed in the model areas. PDM, which shows the frame of the Project in each
model area, is also presented in Chapter 3.
III - 2
CHAPTER 2 OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 Objectives
The objectives of the PCM workshop were as follows:
a) To confirm farmers’ needs and/or potential to the agricultural development,
b) To have common understanding between the project planner (Study Team and
counterpart team) and farmer beneficiaries on the present problems/
constraints to the agricultural development, and appropriate approaches for
the solution of such problems/constraints, and
c) To prepare PDM based on the results of analyses in the workshop.
2.2 Methodology
2.2.1 Program of PCM Workshop
In each location of the model area, three days were spent for the village PCM
workshop. The basic program of the workshop was as follows (see Figure III-1
for the detailed program):
- First day; participation analysis
- Second day; problem analysis
- Third day; objective analysis
About two hours of time were spent for each analysis. For the problem analysis,
however, the time exceeded more than two hours in many model areas. A place of
the workshop was the village office in most model areas.
Identification of the project approaches and preparation of PDM were carried out
together with the counterpart team in the meeting room of the Provincial
Agricultural Service Office, West Java Province. These works were made in the
small scale seminars opened for two times. The first one was held at the end of
October 1999, and the second one was held in the mid-November (see Figure
III-1).
2.2.2 Participants of Village PCM Workshop
In advance of the village PCM workshop in each model area, through the district
agricultural service office, each village office was requested to select 15
participants who were the representatives of owner farmers, tenant farmers,
owner-cum-tenant farmers, labor farmers and woman farmers. However, the
actual composition of the participants was not always balanced as shown in the
III - 3
table below.
Composition of Participants to Village PCM Workshop
Model AreaOwnerFarmer(person)
TenantFarmer(person)
Owner +Tenant
(person)
LaborFarmer(person)
(Female)
(person)
TotalParticipants
(person)1. Mekarjaya 9 4 2 0 (0) 152. Langensari 6 4 5 0 (2) 153. Tugumukti 8 3 2 2 (0) 154. Gekbrong 1 8 4 2 (0) 155. Cisurupan 6 3 2 0 (0) 116. Tanjungkarya 9 2 5 0 (1) 167. Mekarmukti 13 0 2 0 (1) 158. Cisantana 8 0 3 0 (0) 11 Total 60 24 25 4 (4) 113
In addition, relevant officers from the village office, district and subdistrict
agricultural service offices were requested to attend the workshop as observers,
expecting their understanding of the PCM method (a list of participants and
observers of the village PCM workshop is presented in Table III-1).
2.2.3 Moderator and Co-moderator
The Rural Society/Farmers’ Organization expert of the Study Team took charge of
moderator of the PCM workshop. Both a counterpart of the expert and an
assistant (cum-interpreter) who was temporally employed for the operation of the
workshop took charge of co-moderator.
III - 4
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS OF PCM WORKSHOP
3.1 Participation Analysis
In the participation analysis, people, groups, organizations related to the
agricultural production activities were analyzed. Although there were some
differences between the model areas, the result can be summarized as follows
(details of each model area are presented in Figure III-2):
Summary of Participation Analysis Result
Related to cropproduction
Farmers, Farmers Groups, Farm Water Users Association, LaborFarmers
Related to marketingof products:
Village middlemen, Middlemen from Outside, Village Car Owners,Bandung Market, Jakarta Market
Related to farm inputsupply
Village Mini-shop (KIOS), Sub-district Level Retailers, VegetableSeeds Retailers in Bandung and Lembang, Village Seed Growers,KUD, Village Tractor Owners, Village Buffalo Owners, CompostFertilizer Sellers
Agriculturalsupporting services
PPL, PHP, LSM, KUD, Banks at District and Sub-district levels,Extension Office (BPP), District Agricultural Service Office, DistrictLivestock Service Office, District Public Works Service Office
After the above analysis, characteristics and problems of agriculture in each model
area were analyzed as an introduction part of the problem analysis. The results
are presented in Figure III-3.
3.2 Problem Analysis
The core problem and its direct causes analyzed in each model area are presented
in the table below (the problem trees from the eight model areas are given in
Figures from III-4 to III-11).
Core Problem and Its Direct Causes Analyzed in Each Model Area
Direct CausesModel Area Core Problem
1 2 3 4
1. Mekarjaya Lack of capital Low agricultureincome
Difficulty inloaning
2. Langensari Lack of capital Low agricultureincome
Difficulty inloaning
3. Tugumukti Low agricultureincome
Low price ofproducts
Low cropproduction
Unemploymentof farm labors indry season
4. Gekbrong Lack of capital Low agricultureincome
Difficulty inloaning
5. Cisurupan Low agricultureincome
Low price ofproducts
High price offarm inputs
Low cropproduction
No agro-processingactivities
6. Tanjungkarya Lack of capital Low agricultureincome
Difficulty inloaning
7. Mekarmukti Lack of capital Low agricultureincome
Difficulty inloaning
8. Cisantana Low agricultureincome
Low cropproduction
Low price ofproducts
III - 5
Further causes of the direct causes (or causes of the direct causes) in the above
table were similar in the eight model areas. For easy understanding of problems
in the model areas, these causes are classified into (i) production infrastructure,
(ii) production technology, (iii) production inputs, (iv) outputs marketing, (v)
agricultural supporting services, and (vi) others as described below (in each
parenthesis, problems derived from corresponding cause are presented).
a) Production infrastructure
- Inadequacy or insufficiency of irrigation facility (difficult dry season
cropping, low crop production, difficult control of cropping season, etc.)
- Poor condition of village road (little availability of middlemen, difficult
sale of products, etc.)
b) Production technology
- Lack of vegetable production technology (high damage of pest/ disease,
low crop production, low quality of products, etc.)
- Lack of soil management technology(high damage of pest/ disease, low
crop production, etc.)
c) Production inputs
- Expensive farm inputs( small application/utilization of farm inputs,
inappropriate plant management, etc.)
- Expensive and difficult to obtain improved seeds(low crop production,
low quality of products, etc.)
- Expensive and difficult to obtain compost fertilizer( small input of
compost fertilizer, soil deterioration, etc.)
- Lack of production tools and machinery (inappropriate chemical spraying,
difficult pump irrigation, etc.)
d) Outputs marketing
- Low price and large fluctuation of vegetable price (low agriculture income,
instability of agriculture income, etc.)
- Low quality of vegetable products (low price for sale, etc.)
e) Agricultural supporting service
- Difficult to obtain loan (insufficient application/ utilization of farm inputs,
etc.)
- Insufficient availability of extension service (lack of vegetable production
technology, weak farmers’ organization, etc.)
f) Others
- Shortage of land (high cropping intensity, injury by continuous cropping,
III - 6
increase application of agro-chemical, etc.)
- Many non-certificate land (difficult loaning, etc.)
- Shortage of farm labor (inappropriate crop management, increased
production cost, etc.)
- Lack of farmers’ organizational capability (difficult loaning, difficult joint
purchase of farm inputs, difficult joint sale of products, etc.)
3.3 Objective Analysis and Identification of Project Approaches
In the workshop of each model area, the objective tree was prepared. Based on
the objective tree, the project approaches were then identified for each model area.
The identified project approaches are summarized in the table below (the results
of examination made on the project approaches are presented in Figures from III-
12 to III-19).
Project Approaches Identified on Objective Trees
Approach ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧1. Irrigation facility
improvement/ developmentYES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
2. Village road improvement YES YES YES3. Vegetable production
technology improvementYES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
4. Vegetable products qualityimprovement
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
5. Farmers’ organizationactivation
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
6. Agricultural supportingservice improvement
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
7. Land certification programpromotion
YES YES YES YES YES
8. Farm road improvement YES9. Agro-processing industry
developmentYES
①Mekarjaya ④Gekbrong ⑦Mekarmukti②Langensari ⑤Cisurupan ⑧Cisantana③Tugumukti ⑥Tanjungkarya
3.4 Selection of Project Approaches
Based on the concept that the agriculture and rural society should be developed in
an integrated manner, the selection of the project approaches was carried out. In
the selection, issues examined were as follows:
a) As a result of an examination made on project components in each approach,
the “irrigation facility improvement/development approach” and the
“vegetable production technology improvement approach” were combined
into the “vegetable production system improvement approach”. This
combined approach was then selected.
III - 7
b) The “marketing road improvement approach”, the “vegetable products quality
improvement approach” and the “farm road improvement approach” were
combined into the “vegetable products marketing system improvement
approach”. This combined approach was also selected.
c) The “land certification program promotion approach” was not selected
considering its probability of achieving objectives and a size of target group.
In the land certification program, landowners are usually requested to spend a
much cost and time (which mean low probability of achieving objectives).
In addition, this approach doesn’t support tenant farmers, but owner farmers
(small size of target group).
d) The “agro-processing industry development approach” was not selected
considering that this approach would be necessary after the achievement of
“farmers’ organization activation” (low probability of achieving objectives).
e) The “farmers’ organization activation approach” was selected so as to cover
the component expected in the “agricultural supporting service improvement
approach”. Under this approach, the project itself will assist the farmers and
the farmers’ organizations in the model areas.
The selected three approaches consisting of (i) vegetable production technology
improvement, (ii) vegetable products marketing system improvement, and (iii)
farmers’ organization activation are proposed to be implemented in all the model
areas, although the project “inputs” under these approaches would be different
among the model areas. The selected approaches in each model area are then
summarized as follows.
Approaches Selected for Model Areas
Approach ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧1. Vegetable production
technology improvementYES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
2. Vegetable products marketingsystem improvement
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
3. Farmers’ organization activation YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES①Mekarjaya ④Gekbrong ⑦Mekarmukti②Langensari ⑤Cisurupan ⑧Cisantana③Tugumukti ⑥Tanjungkarya
3.5 Preparation of PDM
PDM was prepared for each model area based on the objective tree and the results
of the above examination made on the project approaches. In the preparation,
the “project summary” was first prepared in collaboration with the counterpart
team. Second, other parts of PDM including the “inputs” were analyzed by the
Study Team. The final results of PDM presented in the Interim Report are
III - 8
presented in Tables from III-2 to III-9. The project summary given in PDM can
be described as follows.
a) Project Purpose: Farmers’ income is increased and living standard is
improved through stabilization of vegetable production.
b) Overall Goal: Development model of the model area is expanded over
highland area of West Java Province.
c) Outputs: The following three outputs;
- Vegetable production system is improved.
- Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.
- Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural development.
d) Activities:
Although the “activities” differ with the model areas, those in the typical
PDM are as follows:
For the output of “vegetable production system is improved”;
- To develop irrigation facility including domestic water supply,
- To establish linkage with relevant research institutes, and
- To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
For the output of “marketing system of vegetable products is improved”;
- To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetable products,
- To improve village marketing road, and
- To train farmers on crop planning based on market needs involving private
sector.
For the output of “farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural
development”;
- To train farmers/ farmer groups in forming Farmers Cooperative, Farm
Water Users Association, and Rural Water Supply Users Association.
- To train farmers’ organizations on i) operation and management of rural
facility, ii) joint purchase of farm inputs and tools, iii) joint collection and
delivery of vegetable products, iv) post-harvest handling and packaging, v)
credit handling and management, vi) organization management.
Tables
No. Name Sex Age Dusun Operated Remarks
Land (ha)
MEKARJAYA
Participants
1 Endang Dayu Male 48 Dusun II 2.50
2 Mama R Male 41 Dusun II 0.71
3 Ale Male 34 Dusun III 1.00
4 Juju Male 36 Dusun III 1.00
5 Yoyo Male 28 Dusun III 1.00
6 Ajang Sutiatna Male 39 Dusun III 1.00
7 Endang Rukmaya Male 56 Dusun II 1.00
8 Yoyo Male 60 Dusun III 1.00
9 Lili Male 52 Dusun I 1.43
10 Uus Susanto Male 32 Dusun III 4.00
11 Otong Surahman Male 46 Dusun I 0.43
12 Anang Rochendi Male 45 Dusun I 1.43
13 Dadang Male 38 Dusun I 0.91
14 Toto Male 39 Dusun III 1.29
15 Yaya Sahyana Male 51 Dusun I 1.50
Observers
1 Deden M Taftazany Male PPS,Diperta Kab. DT II Bandung
2 Edi Yusuf Male PPL,Kec. Arjasari
3 Ali Amjahya Male Sekdes,Desa Mekarjaya
4 Mahmud S Male Kades, Desa Mekarjaya
LANGENSARI
Participants
1 Wawan Hermawan Male 32 Nyampay 0.14
2 Amas Supriadi Male 54 Nyampay 0.14
3 Imas Halimah Female 43 Nyampay 0.21
4 Euis Yati Female 34 Nyampay 0.43
5 Uar Hadiat Male 47 Nyampay 0.79
6 Suhaya Male 50 Nyampay 0.14
7 Enung Ruhimat Male 26 Nyampay 0.29
8 Caca Sutisna Male 27 Nyampay 0.29
9 Emus Male 82 Nyampay 0.43
10 Supriatna Male 40 Nyampay 0.14
11 Marna Male 57 Nyampay 0.43
12 Abdul Somad Male 40 Nyampay 0.14
13 Anang Hidayat Male 57 Nyampay 0.24
14 Dolrani DL Male 70 Nyampay 0.29
15 Uce Somantri Male 51 Nyampay 0.57
Observers
1 Sudyatman Male PPL, Kec. Lenbang
2 Ukas Male Kades, Kp Langensari
3 Imas Female Istri Kades, Kp Langensari
TUGUMUKTI
Participants
1 H. Ismail. H. Male 30 Tugu II 2.00
2 H. Sjahid A Male 39 Tugu IV 7.00
3 H. Sulaeman Male 50 Tugu II 0.28
4 Rukman Male 40 Tugu II 0.14
5 H. Ismattuloh Male 30 Tugu I 2.00
6 H. Soleh Male 30 Tugu IV 4.00
7 Uta Rustaya Male 48 Tugu II 0.75
8 Uci Male 65 Tugu II 0.50
9 Nandi Aji Male 40 Tugu II 0.00
10 Kokom Male 44 Tugu IV 0.14
11 Unda Male 40 Tugu IV 0.06
12 Didi Male 40 Tugu V 0.00
13 Atim Male 55 Tugu V 1.00
14 Sopyani Male 49 Tugu VI 0.21
15 Hamdi Male 67 Tugu VI 0.70
Table III-1 (1/4) List of Participants and Observors in Village PCM Workshop
T - III - 1
No. Name Sex Age Dusun Operated Remarks
Land (ha)
GEKBRONG
Participants
1 Jueng Sobani Male 64 Tabrik 0.56
2 Suparman Male 40 Tabrik 0.80
3 Abeh Kosasih Male 46 Babakan 1.00
4 Didi Male 49 Loji 0.40
5 H. Ishaq Male 65 Kenket 0.40
6 Aep Saepudin Male 30 Loji 0.80
7 Oim Male 38 Kebon Karet 1.00
8 Oling Male 50 Babakan 1.00
9 Bubun Male 39 Loji 0.52
10 Mansur Male 45 Kebon Karet 0.12
11 Solih Male 52 Loji 1.00
12 Ali Nurjaman Male 30 Kebon Karet 0.48
13 Umar Male 37 Loji 0.16
14 Jajang Male 30 Loji 0.00
15 Irin Male 30 Loji 0.00
Observers
1 Dadang H Male Chief of sub Section Water
Management&Climate Observer,
Food Crrop Office Cianjur
2 Lili Mulyadin Male Sub Section of Social, Kecamatan
Warung Kondang
3 Entus Kusdinar Male PPL, Kec. Warung Kondang
4 Adang Supriatna Male PPL, Gekbrong
5 M Hasan Kurdi Male Head of Sub Office, Sub of Agricul-
ture Office Kec. Warung Kondang
6 M Oneng Male Head of Gekbrong Village
7 E Melamas Male LKMD, Gekbrong
CISURUPAN
Participants
1 Jajang Male 31 Kp. Cisero 1.00
2 Apip Male 26 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.14
3 Aban Ruchyana Male 55 Kp. Pasar Wetan 1.50
4 Ica Andriana Male 35 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.29
5 Eron Suwarwa Male 56 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.14
6 Oman Rukmana Male 36 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.11
7 Arif Male 35 Kp. Kidul 0.14
8 Ujer Male 55 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.14
9 Maman Male 50 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.43
10 M. Soeparman Male 58 Kp. Pasar Tengah 0.29
11 Ohib Male 30 Kp. Sari Pulo 0.43
Observers
1 Wahyu Marno Male Dit BRPL-Subdit TLA
2 Herry Male Dit BRPL-Subdit LPT
3 Endang Karun Male Head of Agricultural
4 Juju Rukman Male PHP
5 Iis Indrayani Male Kasubsi Dit GA
6 Beni Yoga G Male Staff Rehaliasi
7 Achmad Sulaeman Male Kasi Rehaliasi
8 Suhermat Male Dinas Pertanian Prop DTI Jabar
TANJUNGKARUYA
Participants
1 Pendi Male 47 Kp. Cidadali 0.57
2 M.O. Bunyamin Male 55 Kp. Pakuhaji 2.14
3 Wahidin Male 50 Kp. Engkol 2.00
4 M. Dana K Male 60 Kp. Pangkalan 1.71
5 Idan Male 50 Kp. Pakuhaji 3.00
6 Jajang Male 30 Kp. Tanjung 2.14
7 Adin Male 60 Kp. Rantun 2.14
Table III-1 (2/4) List of Participants and Observors in Village PCM Workshop
T - III - 2
No. Name Sex Age Dusun Operated Remarks
Land (ha)
8 Suhanda Male 45 Kp. Pakuhaji 1.71
9 Aid Male 50 Kp. Sidodadi 2.00
10 Misbah Male 40 Kp. Bojongsirna 2.14
11 Suratman Male 50 Kp. Awiligar 2.14
12 Emud Male 57 Kp. Pasarmuncang 0.86
13 Inan Male 50 Kp. Cidadali 2.14
14 Sajid Male 65 Kp Awiligar 1.43
15 Iding S Male 60 Kp. Tanjung Simuru 6.00
16 Tati Rohyati Female 26 Kp. Tanjung Simuru 2.14
Observers
1 N. Sunendar Male PPS, Dinas Pertanian, Kab. Garut
2 Endang N Female KCD, Pertanaian Samarang
3 Rusganda Male Head of Tanjung karya Village
4 A. Mulyadi Male Secretary of Tanjung karya Village
5 Suhanda Male Head of Tanjung karya Village
6 Wahidin Male Head of Tanjung karya Village
7 Harun Male Head of Public Prosperity
8 Adin Male Head of Development
MEKARMUKTI
Participants
1 E. Toyib Male 47 Citunggul 0.86
2 Juhari S Male 30 Ciliang 0.71
3 Ojim Male 40 Citunggul 0.21
4 Kusna Male 60 Citunggul 1.01
5 Taryat Male 28 Ciliang 0.21
6 Jana Male 55 Ciliang 0.71
7 Asari Male 58 Ciliang 0.71
8 Hatijah Female 43 Ciliang 0.57
9 Ojo Tasja Male 53 Citunggul 1.14
10 Tatang Male 35 Ciliang 1.00
11 Salnam Male 45 Citunggul 0.36
12 Madhani Male 52 Ciliang 1.50
13 Saim Male 72 Ciliang 2.86
14 M. Soleh Male 60 Citunggul 2.14
15 Karna Male 73 Ciliang 0.29
Observers
1 Amir Male KCD. Buahdua
2 Dedeng Male Researcher plant disease, Buah dua
3 Maman Suparman Male Agricultural official Sumedang
4 S. sugiatna Male Secretary of Village
5 Suryana Male Mekarmukti
6 A. Sukria Male Defense Institute of Villager
7 Omo Male Jugul
8 Oman Rutanan Male Head of Mekarmukti Village
CISANTANA
Participants
1 Kalim Male 59 Cisantana 0.56
2 Sumarno Male 57 Cisantana 0.21
3 Suhenda Male 60 Cisantana 0.36
4 Saleh Male 59 Cisantana 0.43
5 Darso Male 42 Cisantana 0.24
6 Tarlan Male 57 Cisantana 0.18
7 Ganda Suralaksana Male 77 Cisantana 0.43
8 Darsipin Male 65 Cisantana 0.29
9 Haruman Male 29 Malar Aman 0.29
10 U. Sukirman Male 53 Dusun Dano 1.00
11 Warsono Male 40 Sukamanah 0.29
Observers
1 Ir. Triastami Male PCH Kasi Lahan, Dinas Pertanian
Kuningan
Table III-1 (3/4) List of Participants and Observors in Village PCM Workshop
T - III - 3
No. Name Sex Age Dusun Operated Remarks
Land (ha)
2 Tatang Sutardi Male Kasubsi TOA, Dinas Pertanian,
Kuningan
3 Emon Male KCD Cigugur
4 Rustaman Male Kepala BPP Cigugur
5 Dadin Male PPL Cisantana, Cigugur
6 Affandi Male Head of Cisantana Village
PCM WORKSHOP FOR PDM PREPARATION
(October 28, 1999)
Participants
1 Ir. Suhermat Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from West Java
2 Tatang Sutardi Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from Kuningan
3 Maman Suparman Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from Sumedang
4 Beni YG Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from Garut
5 Deden M Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from West Java
6 Achmad Male Counterpart of Dinas Pertanian
from Garut
7 Tangkas Pandjaitan Male Staff, Directorate of Land
Rehabilitation and Development
8 Ir. H. Aan Suhandi Male MOA Counterpart
9 Dadeng SA Male Counterpart from West Java
10 Kurniadhi Didi Male Counterpart from West Java
11 Suyatman Male Counterpart from West Java
12 H. Kuronuma Male JICA Study Team,
Team Leader
13 N. Sanbe Male JICA Study Team,
Rural Infrastructure
14 H. Ishikawa Male JICA Study Team,
Agronomist
15 T. Saito Male JICA Study Team,
Agro-processing/Marketing
16 Y. Mizuguchi Male JICA Study Team,
Environment
Table III-1 (4/4) List of Participants and Observors in Village PCM Workshop
T - III - 4
T - III - 5
Table III-2 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Mekarjaya (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Mekarjaya Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-22-3
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Village transportation system is improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
---
------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesNumber of in-coming middlemenChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users Association
--
-
---
------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeInformation from Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users Association
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-22-3
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To improve village marketing road.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:324M/M (Rp.648 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 100 ha (Rp.658 mil.)- Village marketing road: 3.3 km (Rp.511 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 10 units (Rp.100 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.242 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 16 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.218 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.2,393 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 6
Table III-3 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Langensari (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Langensari Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-22-3
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied together with domestic water.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Village transportation system is improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
---
-------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesNumber of in-coming middlemenChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users AssociationOperation of Rural Water Supply Users Associat.
--
-
---
-------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeInformation from Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users AssociationBalance sheet of Rural Water Supply Users Ass.
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-22-3
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility including rural water supply.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To improve village marketing road.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:162M/M (Rp.324 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 72 ha (Rp.513 mil.)- Village marketing road: 1.2 km (Rp.211 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 7 units (Rp. 70 mil.)- Rural water supply system: 600 households (Rp.240 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.169 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 12 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.154 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.1,693 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 7
Table III-4 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Tugumukti (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Tugumukti Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-2
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
--
------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users Association
--
-
--
------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users Association
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:108M/M (Rp.216 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 50 ha (Rp.362 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 5 units (Rp. 50 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.116 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 11 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp. 76 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.831 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 8
Table III-5 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Gekbrong (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Gekbrong Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-22-3
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied together with domestic water.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Village transportation system is improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
---
-------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesNumber of in-coming middlemenChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users AssociationOperation of Rural Water Supply Users Associat.
--
-
---
-------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeInformation from Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users AssociationBalance sheet of Rural Water Supply Users Ass.
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-22-3
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility including rural water supply.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To improve village marketing road.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:108M/M (Rp.216 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 50 ha (Rp.401 mil.)- Village marketing road: 1.75 km (Rp.271 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 5 units (Rp. 50 mil.)- Rural water supply system: 200 households (Rp.120 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.117 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 11 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.119 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.1,305 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 9
Table III-6 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Cisurupan (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Cisurupan Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-2
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied together with domestic water.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
--
-------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users AssociationOperation of Rural Water Supply Users Associat.
--
-
--
-------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users AssociationBalance sheet of Rural Water Supply Users Ass.
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility including rural water supply.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:108M/M (Rp.216 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 40 ha (Rp.178 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 4 units (Rp. 40 mil.)- Rural water supply system: 350 households (Rp.245 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.149 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 11 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp. 84 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.923 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 10
Table III-7 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Tanjungkarya (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Tanjungkarya Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-2
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
--
------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users Association
--
-
--
------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users Association
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:167M/M (Rp.324 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 80 ha (Rp.426 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 8 units (Rp. 80 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.159 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 12 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.100 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.1,101 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 11
Table III-8 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Mekarmukti (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Mekarmukti Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-2
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
--
------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users Association
--
-
--
------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users Association
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:216M/M (Rp.432 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 80 ha (Rp.872 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 8 units (Rp. 80 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.201 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 13 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.160 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.1,758 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
T - III - 12
Table III-9 Integrated Agricultural and Rural Development Project in Cisantana (PDM)
Target Group:Farmers in Cisantana Model Area (including tenant farmers) Project Term:5 yearsProject Summary Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalDevelopment model of the model area is expanded overhighland area of West Java Province.
- Increased number of similar schemes - District and Sub-district Agricultural ServiceOffices
- Ministry of Agriculture continuouslyadopts the horticultural dev. policy.
Project PurposeFarmers’ income is increased and living standard isimproved through stabilization of vegetable production.
- Increase rate of farm income (to be adjustedusing GDP deflator)
- Farm surveys to be made in project monitoringworks
- Economic situations of Indonesia donot aggravate seriously.
Outputs1.1-11-2
1-3
2.2-12-22-3
3.3-13-2
Vegetable production system is improved.Irrigation water is supplied together with domestic water.Research information on vegetable crop cultivationtechnology is available.Farmers’ vegetable production technology is improved.
Marketing system of vegetable products is improved.Farmers’ collection and delivery activities are improved.Village transportation system is improved.Crop planning is formulated by farmers based on marketneeds.
Farmers’ organizations are activated in agricultural dev.Farmers/farmer groups are reorganized.Capacity of farmers’ organizations is improved in O&Mof rural facilities, marketing of vegetables, farm inputs &credit supply, and organizational management.
--
-
---
-------
Vegetable cropping intensityUnit yields of vegetable crops
Amount of farm inputs
Amount and value of jointly delivered vegetablesNumber of in-coming middlemenChanges in cropping intensity
Date of registration and number of membersPlanned and actual cropping patternsNumber of credit users and loan amountHandling amount and value of farm inputsOperation of Farmers’ CooperativeOperation of Farm Water Users AssociationOperation of Rural Water Supply Users Associat.
--
-
---
-------
Record of Farm Water Users AssociationFarm surveys
Farm surveys
Record of Farmers’ CooperativeInformation from Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of WUA/Farm surveys
Registration records of Coop. and WUARecord of WUA and farm surveysRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeRecord of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farmers’ CooperativeBalance sheet of Farm Water Users AssociationBalance sheet of Rural Water Supply Users Ass.
-
-
Existing marketing and transportationsystem for vegetables do notaggravate seriously.Relevant research institutes continuetheir research works.
Activities Inputs for this Model Area (Inputs for All Model Areas)1-11-21-3
2-1
2-22-3
3-1
3-2
To develop irrigation facility including rural water supply.To establish linkage with relevant research institutes.To operate farmers field school along with demo-plots.
To improve collection and delivery facilities for vegetableproducts.To improve village marketing road.To train farmers on crop planning based on market needsinvolving private sector.
To train farmers/farmer groups in forming Farmers’Cooperative, Farm Water Users Association, and RuralWater Supply Users Association.To train farmers’ organizations on:3.2.1 operation and management of rural facility,3.2.2 joint purchase of farm inputs and tools,3.2.3 joint collection and delivery of vegetable products,3.2.4 post-harvest handling and packaging,3.2.5 credit handling and management, and3.2.6 organization management.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- Village Coordinators:324M/M (Rp.648 mil.)
Facility- Irrigation facility: 120 ha (Rp.937 mil.)- Village marketing road: 3 km (Rp.450 mil.)- Collection/delivery facility: 12 units (Rp. 120mil.)- Rural water supply system: 500 households (Rp.250 mil.)
Training of farmers/farmer groups/farmers’ organizations: (Rp.254 mil.)
Training of Village Coordinators: (Rp. 16 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.268 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.2,943 million
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Manpower- External experts: 540 M/M (Rp.25,290 mil.)
Facility- Adaptive Trial Farm Improvement: 2 ha (Rp.320 mil.)Machine/Equipment- Car: 2 units- Computer: 5 units- Photo copy machine: 1 unit- Motorcycle for Village Coordinator: 25 units (Rp.425mil.)Training of Task Team: (Rp.471 mil.)
Administration cost: (Rp.2,650 mil.)
Total Cost: Rp.29,156 million
-
-
-
-
-
Cooperation of relevant researchinstitutes is provided.Cooperation of relevant agencies atprovincial, district and sub-districtlevels is provided.Cooperation of provate sector isprovided.
Pre-conditionsFarmers in the model area participatein the Project.Ministry of Agriculture and West JavaProvince Agricultural Service Officecontinue their support to the Project.
Figures
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T
PCM Workshop1. Preparation2. PCM Training3. Village PCM Workshop
1) Tugumukti- 1st Session (16:00-19:00)- 2nd Session (15:00-18:00)- 3rd Session (14:30-17:00)
2) Langensari- 1st Session (13:30-16:00)- 2nd Session (14:00-17:00)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
3) Mekarjaya - 1st Session (14:00-16:30)- 2nd Session (14:00-16:30)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
4) Gekbrong - 1st Session (14:00-18:30)- 2nd Session (14:00-16:30)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
5) Cisantana - 1st Session (14:30-16:30)- 2nd Session (14:00-16:30)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
6) Tanjungkarya- 1st Session (14:00-16:30)- 2nd Session (14:00-16:30)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
7) Cisurupan - 1st Session (9:00-11:30)- 2nd Session (13:30-15:30)- 3rd Session (14:00-16:30)
8) Mekarmkti - 1st Session (14:30-16:30)- 2nd Session (14:00-16:30)- 3rd Session (13:00-15:00)
4. Preparation of Draft PDM
Memo. Items1. Weekly meeting / Small scale seminar2. Small scale seminar3. Village PCM Workshop with JKT C/P
Working day Move to the site Overnight at the siteWorking day for PCM Workshop Back to BDG
October November
Figure III-1 Program of PCM Workshop
C
F - III - 1
(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya
(2) Langensari(2) Langensari(2) Langensari(2) Langensari
(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti
Figure III-2 (1/4) Participation Analysis - People, Groups, Organizations Related to Agricultural Production Activities -
ProducersProducersProducersProducersMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/Groups
Farm InputFarm InputFarm InputFarm InputSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliers
Supporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting Groups
Farmers Farmers Farmers Farmers
Farmer Group,Mekarjaya
Farmer Group,Mekarrahayu
KUD, Sarwamukti PHP
KUD, Sarwamukti KIOS, Tugumukti PPL
Youth Group
Farmers Local Middlemen KIOS in Village
Farmer Groups KUD in Lembang
P3A (Water UsersAssociation)
TPK (Sub-KUD) inVillage
Farmers Village MiddlemenFarmer Seed
Growers in villagePPL
Farmer GroupKIOS in village and
ArjasariPHP
KUD in ArjasariP3A (Water Users
Association)
KUD, Sarwamukti
Village Middlemen
Village PKK
Kab. Public Worksfor road maintain.
IndukcaringinMarket
Kab. Public Worksfor Irrigation
Rent-a-carinvillage
Saving Group
Pump Seller inLembang
Middlemen fromOutside Village
Banks for Credit
PPL
PHP
SLPHT (FarmersSchool)
Kab. Public Worksfor Irrigation
F - III - 2
(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong
(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan
Figure III-2 (2/4) Participation Analysis - People, Groups, Organizations Related to Agricultural Production Activities -
FarmersMiddlemen in
VillageKIOS in Village PPL
Farmer Group,Sumber Rejeki (30
members)PHP
Farmer Group, Sugh-mukti (24 members)
BUMN for Credit(Gov. Office in
BDG)
LSM for Credit(NGO's Coop)
Farmers Middlemen KIOS in Village PPL
Farmer Group,Mekarjaya
Farmer Group,Gekbrong
Farm Inputs Shopin Village
PHP
Farmers CooperativeKab. Livestock forartificial insemi.
Kab. Public Worksfor Irrigation
Seed Grower inPurwakarta
Banks in Cianjurfor Credit
Chicken FeedSupplier in
Cianjur
Tractor Dealer inCianjur
BPP
KUD in Kec.
Farm Group,Palurupan (25
members)
Farmer Group,Tirtakencana (15
members)
Farmer Group,Mukti (10 members)
BRI/BKPD in Kec.
ProducersProducersProducersProducersMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/Groups
Farm InputFarm InputFarm InputFarm InputSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliers
Supporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting Groups
F - III - 3
(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya
(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti
Figure III-2 (3/4) Participation Analysis - People, Groups, Organizations Related to Agricultural Production Activities -
FarmersMiddlemen in
villageFertilizer Shop in
SamarangPPL
Farmer Groups,- Rahayu I- Rahayu II- Rahayu III
- Muktipankalan- Nyalindung- Cidadali
- Sankanhurip- Pakohaji
Rent-a-car invillage
Seed Shop inSamarang
PHP
Potato SeedSupplier inSamarang
FarmersMiddlemen for
BananaTraders for Farm
InputsPPL/BPP
Farmer Group,Mekarjaya
Middlemen forPaddy
KIOS in village PHP
Labor FarmersKUD in Sangkanhurip(0.5 km from villa)
LSM (NGO's CreditSupplier)
KUD/BRI for CreditSupply
KUD, Samarang
P3A (Water UserAssociation)
Women's FarmerGroup
Contact Farmers
Women's FarmerGroups
P3A (Water UserAssociation)
Middlemen forVegetables
Rice Mill Unit invillage
Rent-a-car invillage
Rent-a-Tractor invillage
Rent-a-Buffalo invillage
Seed Suppliers
Kab. Public Worksfor Irrigation Dev.
Village Government
ProducersProducersProducersProducersMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/Groups
Farm InputFarm InputFarm InputFarm InputSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliers
Supporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting Groups
F - III - 4
(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana
Figure III-2 (4/4) Participation Analysis - People, Groups, Organizations Related to Agricultural Production Activities -
FarmersMiddlemen in
villageKIOS in village PPL/BPP
Farmer Groups,- Tunggulmetu
- Iruk
Middlemen fromOutside village
KUD Kab. Agriculture
KUD, Sarwamukti Seed GrowersKab. Land
Conservation
Kab. Public Worksfor Irrigation
Kab. Public Worksfor Road Improve.
Compost FertilizerSuppliers
ProducersProducersProducersProducersMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedMarketing RelatedPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/GroupsPersons/Groups
Farm InputFarm InputFarm InputFarm InputSuppliersSuppliersSuppliersSuppliers
Supporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting GroupsSupporting Groups
F - III - 5
(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya(1) Mekarjaya
(2) Langensari(2) Langensari(2) Langensari(2) Langensari
(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti(3) Tugumukti
Figure III-3 (1/3) Participation Analysis - Characteristics and Problems of Agriculture -
CharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristics ProblemsProblemsProblemsProblems
Farmers are vegetableproducers
Vegetable producedare exported
Farmers don't applyproper amount of
fertilizer
Farmers use expensivevegetable seeds
Farmers use chemicalfertilizers
Farmers receivetechnical service
from PPL
Farmers use expensivefertilizers
Farmers can't producevegetable seeds
Farmers use compostfertilizer
Vegetables producedare low quality
Farmers use expensivepesticide
Labor is short forvegetable cultivation
Farmers use expensivefarm inputs
Crop production islow both vegetables
and paddy
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Vegetables are alwaysattached bypest/disease
Farmers cultivatemany kinds of crops
Shortage of land forcrop cultivation
Farmers don't havetechnology for vege.
seed production
Farmers are difficultto control
pest/disease
Farmers use expensivefarm inputs
Farmers are lackingin technology for
vegetable production
Labor is short forcrop production
Farmers growvegetables in
highland
Labor is short infarming
Climate is foggy inall crop season
Improved vegetableseeds are not easily
available
Irrigation water isinsufficient in dry
season
Farmers are difficultto get Compost
fertilizer
Water is short in dryseason
Road conditions arevery poor
Farmers use expensivefertilizer
Vegetables are alwaysattached bypest/disease
Farmers are difficultto control
pest/disease
Farmers use lowquality agro-chemicals
Farmers use lowquality fertilizers
Farmers loseproduction due to
pest/disease
Farmersinsufficiently apply
ago-chemicals
Farmersinsufficiently apply
fertilizers
Farm labor charge isvery expensive
Farmers use pesticideOnly 20% of
vegetables producedare exported
Vegetables arecultivated on fertile
soil
Farmers are lackingin cultivation
technology
F - III - 6
(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong(4) Gekbrong
(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan(5) Cisurupan
(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya(6) Tanjungkarya
Figure III-3 (2/3) Participation Analysis - Characteristics and Problems of Agriculture -
Farmers use expensivevegetable seeds
Farmers are short intechnology for
vegetable cultivation
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Farmers are lackingin farming tools
Farmers are good inpotato cultivation
There is no basicprice policy for
vegetables
There is no agro-processing activity
High quality chili isproduced
Labor wage rate issmall in village
Farmers cultivatesame crops in same
season
Vegetables areattached byPest/disease
Vegetables are alwaysattached bypest/disease
Farmers don't havesufficient farm tools
(e.g. sprayers)
Foggy climate bringsa lot of pest/disease
on vegetables
Cabbages are damagedby root disease
Soil erosion occursin wet season
Farmers use expensivefertilizers
Farmers use expensivevegetable seeds
Farmers use expensiveagro-chemicals
PPL insufficientlyvisits village
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
PPL insufficientlyvisits village
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Compost fertilizer isdifficultly available
Price of vegetablesare low for market
Vegetables aredamaged by virus
Compost fertilizer isinsufficiently
available
Farmers are difficultto get credit
Water is notavailable for
cultivation during
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Marketing ofvegetables is
difficult
Farmers lose profitfrom vegetable
production
Vegetables prices arecheap in markets
Water shortage in dryseason
Water flow is smallin water source river
in dry season
Farmers use expensivefarm inputs
Amount of orangeproduced is small
Farmers apply smallamount of fertilizers
to vegetables
Farmers haveinsufficient technologyin vegetable production
Climate and soil aresuitable for orange
production
Farmers don't applyproper amount of
fertilizer
Labor is insufficientfor crop cultivation
Fertilizer Shop inSamarang
Farmers use expensivefarm inputs
Field transportationcost is expensive
No farm roads areavailable
Shortage of water indry season for crop
cultivation
CharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristics ProblemsProblemsProblemsProblems
Vegetables aredamaged by
pest/disease
F - III - 7
(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti(7) Mekarmukti
(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana(8) Cisantana
Figure III-3 (3/3) Participation Analysis - Characteristics and Problems of Agriculture -
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Farmers can't farmingduring dry season
Vegetables aredamaged by
pest/disease
Irrigation canal isbroken
Marketing ofvegetables is
difficult
Farmers don't havefarm tools (e.g.
sprayer & water pump)
Paddy is damaged bypest/disease
Farm inputs areinsufficiently
available in KIOS
Marketing of palawijacrops is difficult
Agricultural extensionservice is insufficient
in village
Compost fertilizer islacking for vegetable
cultivation
Farmers cultivatevegetables on poor
soil
Vegetable productionis good in village
Farmers don't havecapital forinvestment
Farmers have to buyvegetable seeds in
Bandung
Water shortage duringdry season for crop
cultivation
Improved seeds aredifficult to obtainin village (paddy &
Irrigation intakeweir is broken
Seed Shop in SamarangFarmers don't applyproper amount of
fertilizer
No piped domesticwater is available
Village roadcondition is poor
Farmers are lackingin creativity
Village roadcondition is poor
Farmers use expensivefertilizers
Farmers cultivatesame crops in same
crop season
Farmers followtraditionalcultivation
Farmers are difficultto get high price of
vegetables
Farmers don't havesufficient number of
hand sprayers
Labor is expensivefor farming
Labor is expensivefor farming
Vegetables aredamaged by
pest/disease
Irrigation facilityis damaged
Many farmers arelosing interest in
vegetable production
Farmers don't supplysufficient amount of
agro-chemicals
CharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristicsCharacteristics ProblemsProblemsProblemsProblems
F - III - 8
Figure III-4 Problem Tree in Mekarjaya
Farmers areDifficult to get
credit
Farmers have nocollateral
Farmers' land isnot certificated
Farmers are notinterested in
credit
Economic crisisof Indonesia
Banks Interestrates are high
Farmer groupshave no saving
Farmers arelacking
knowledge insaving
Procedure ofloan is very
slow
Crop productiondecrease
Farmers' incomedecrease
Farmers are poor
Core Problem
Lack of Capitalin farm
households
Difficult tomaintain crops
Compostfertilizer is short
Labor shortageShortage of
seeds
Cultivated landdecrease
Farmers can'tbuy cow
Farmers can'tbuy farm inputs
Farmers can'thire farm labor
Farmers can'tbuy animal
Farmers can'tbuy pump
Water isinsufficient in
dry season
Small watersource in dry
season
No irrigationfacility isavailable
There is noGov. irrigationdeve. project
Village locationis far fromnearby city
Lack of PPLguidance
Lack oftechnology
There is noGov. agricul.deve. project
Production islow
Crop harvest isunsuccess
Middlemendon't want tobuy farmers
products
Middlemen areafraid of "no
profit"
Products pricesare fluctuated
Poor quality ofproducts
Too muchproduction of
same crops
Farmers followtraditionalpractice
Uniformedcropping pattern
in wet season
Low price ofproducts
KIOS is too farto purchase
input
Pest/diseasedamage is very
high
No sufficientapplication of
farm inputs
Farm inputs areexpensive
Farmers' incomeis low
F - III - 9
Figure III-5 Problem Tree in Langensari
Capital is Shortin farm
households
Low income
Farmers can'thire farm labor
Many farmersbecome
unemployment
Quality ofproducts
become low
Farmers'become poor
Many productsare stolen
Difficult to getcredit from
banks
Lack ofcollateral
Money is shortto buy land
Farmers havesmall land
Profit loss &low income
Production isunstable
Banks don'tbelieve farmers
Less servicesfrom bank
Low price ofvegetables
Low cultivationtechnique
No KUD forcollection of
products
Too muchcompetition in
production
No KUD formarketing of
products
Uniformedcroppingpattern
Prices are notstable
Lowproduction
Farm inputsare expensive
Small farminputs
Farmers can'tcultivate in dry
season
Long distanceto water source
(500 m)
No pump forirrigation
Land is in highelevation
No irrigationfacility isavailable
Shortage ofwater in dry
season
Crop season isshort
A lack of PPLguidance
A lot ofdiseases
Low price ofproducts
Poor quality ofproducts
Lack oftechnology
Lack oftechnology in
seed production
Quality ofchemical is low
Farmers can'tbuy farm tools
Difficult to buyfarm inputs
Planting areabecome small
Low productionof crops
Farmers can'tget benefit
Farmers can'tmaintain crops
Marketing ofproducts is
failed
Farmers can'tcontinuefarming
Farmers'income become
small
Core Problem
F - III - 10
Figure III-6 Problem Tree in Tugumukti
Low Income
Unemploymentin dry season
Land elevationis high
No capital isavailable
No skill to getother works
No land towork
Lack of waterin dry season
Lack of capital Lack ofirrigationfacility
Spraying is noteffectively done
Spraying isirregular
Too much fogLimitedly use
of ago-chemical
Farmer can'twork
Too muchrainfall
Price ofchemical is high
Lack of capital
Crops aredamaged bypest/disease
Shortage ofwater
Limitedcropping season
Same croppingseason
Crop plantingstarts at same
time
Same croppingseason
Products aresame with other
areas
Over productionof products
Poor quality ofproducts
Low price ofproducts
Low educationlevel
PPL Limitedlyvisit (1/month)
Farmers don'thave technique
to produce seeds
Poor seedquality
Lack of farmingtechnology
Lack of Capital
Soil is dried up
No irrigationfacility
Shortage ofwater source
Very far towater source
Field is notirrigated
No planting infield in dry
season (8-9)
Very far towater source
Crops aredamaged by
wind
Poor harvest inwet season (3-4)
Low production
Small capitalfor investment
Difficult to buyfertilizer
Difficult to buychemical
Difficult to buyseeds
Difficult to buyland
Difficult to buyfarm tools
Difficult to buyfood
Many pest/disease
Difficult tomake farming
Low Production
Core Problem
F - III - 11
Figure III-7 Problem Tree in Gekbrong
Core ProblemCapital is short infarm households
Difficult toborrow land
Difficult to buyfarm inputs
Low income infarm h'holds
Difficult to carryout farmingNo success in
farming
Difficult to makelife
Difficult to buyland
Farmers are poor
Farmers don'thave land
Interest rate isvery high in
informal loan
No KUD isavailable for the
village
No KUT isavailable
No training tofarmer groups is
given
PPL don't havemotorcycle
PPL visitsvillage
insufficiently
No farmersgroup isavailable
No saving groupis available
PPL is too far tovisit
Farmers have nocollateral
Banks don'tbelieve farmers
There is no landcertification
project
Farmers have noland certificate
Low Income
Irrigation canalis not available
Water shortagein dry season
Water storagedam is notavailable
Fail in harvest
Low cropproduction
Many insectdamage
Lack of cropmaintenance
No sufficientpest control
Uniformedcroppingpattern
Low quality ofproducts
KUD is notavailable
(bankrupt)
Expensive farminputs
Crops areharvested in a
same time
Low price ofproducts
Market islimitedlyavailable
Over productionof crops
Lack oftransportation
means
Difficult to getcredit
F - III - 12
Figure III-8 Problem Tree in Cisurupan
Short in capitalShort in
technology
No processingactivities in
village
Cheap price ofvegetables in
market
Farmerscultivate same
crops
Farmers practicewrong cropping
pattern
Farmers selectcrops followingmarketing price
No basic pricepolicy forvegetables
High price offarm inputs
Over dosage ofchemicals
Lot of croppest/diseases
Farmers areshort in
technology
Low productionof vegetables
Lack of fertilizerapplication
Water is short indry season
Expensive priceof farm inputs
Water doesn'tflow in
traditional canal
Irrigation canalis damaged
Landslide andsedimentation in
canal
Core ProblemLow income in
farm households
Farmers becomeunhealthy
Farmers aredifficult to buy
food
Many farmersbecome jobless
Farmers aredifficult to buy
farm inputs
Farmers haveless cultivated
land
Farmers can'tcontinue farming
Farmers becomepoor
F - III - 13
Figure III-9 Problem Tree in Tanjungkarya
Core Problem
Capital is shortin farm
households
Small seedapplication
Crops areattacked by pest
Low productionof crops
Crops aredamaged by pest
Low income infarm h'holds
Difficult to carryout farming
Smallapplication of
ti id
Farmers can'tbuy enough
pesticide
Farmers can'tbuy enough
seeds
Farmers can'tbuy enough
pesticide
Farmers loseprofit
Unstable priceof vegetables
No farm road isavailable
Fieldtransportationis expensive
Farmers can'tcultivate highquality vegeta.
Farmers can'tbuy low price of
seeds
Farmers can'tbuy high quality
seeds
Application offarm inputs is
small
Vegetables aredamaged bypest/decease
Low price ofvegetables
Low quality ofvegetables
Lack of cropmaintenance
Labor is shortin village
PPL visitsvillage
insufficiently
Low production
Farmers can'tcultivate in dry
season
Farmers areshort in
technology
Poor soilfertility
Water shortagein dry season
No irrigationsystem isavailable
Difficult to getcredit
Farmers don'thave collateral
Banks don't trustfarmers
High cost tomake certificate
Farmers don'thave landcertificate
Farmers don'thave land
Traders don'tprovide loan to
farmers
Farmers loseprofit
Farmers don'trepay to traders
F - III - 14
Figure III-10 Problem Tree in Mekarmukti
Core ProblemCapital is short infarm households
Farmers can'tcontinue farmingProduction don't
increase
Farmers becomesick
Farmers' incomeis low
Farmers are lazy
Farmers are poor
Land is notproductive
Low income infarm households
Vegetables aredamaged bypest/disease
Low price ofvegetables
Low quality ofvegetables
Lack of cropmaintenance
Farmers don'thave technologyfor vege. culti.
Lack ofextension
service
Improved seedsfor vegetables
are not available
Insufficientsupply of farminputs in KIOS
Smallapplication offarm inputs
Lack of farmtools
Expensive priceof farm inputs
Low cropproduction
Water shortagein dry season
No water flow inirri. canal
Small cultivationland in dry
season
Lot ofsedimentation
due to landslide
Irrigation dam isbroken
Irrigation canalis broken
Canal wasdamaged by soil
erosion
There are bigstones in canaldue to landslide
Farmers can'trehabilitate
irrigation canal
Rehabilitationcost is expensive
No budget forrehabilitation is
available
Paddy isdamaged bypest/disease
Farmers aredifficult to
borrow capital
Banks don'tbelieve farmers
Farmers don'thave landcertificate
There is nogovernment
support
Farmers don'thave collateral
Farmers havesmall cropproduction
Many land isfallow for 8
months
Farmers can'trepay loan
Farmers havetoo much debt
Farmers arehungry
Cultivated landis decreased
Farmers can'tbuy farm input
Many farmersare unemployed
Farmers arebankrupt
F - III - 15
Figure III-11 Problem Tree in Cisantana
Core ProblemLow income of
farm households
Difficult to getgood price of
products
Capital shortagein farm h'holds
Farmers can'tbuy sufficientfarm inputs
Lack of cropmaintenance
Products' qualityand quantity
can't compete inmarket
Low income offarm households
Farm inputs arenot sufficient
Farmers can'timprove farming
technique
Cultivation areais decreased
Farmers have nosavings
Farmers have nofunds for health
care
Farmers have bigdebts
Farmers can'trepay KUT
Farmers can'twork
Farmers becomejobless
Farmers loseprosperity
Low productionof crops
Gov. don'tsupport farmers
in groupestablishment
Lack ofmaintenance
Farmers are notinterested ingroup work
Farmers dependon expensive
inputs
Soil condition ispoor in the
village
Over dosage ofchemical input
Low input ofcompostfertilizer
Gov. suggestedto use chemical
in 70'
Farmers can'tcropping in dry
season
Irrigationfacility isdamaged
Farmers can'tbuy enough
inputs
Fertilizer price isexpensive
Cheap fertilizeris not available
Farm inputs areat low level
Road conditionis poor
Middlemen'sprices areuniformed
Middlemen arelimitedlyavailable
Middlemen fromoutside don't
come to village
Cropping patternis uniformed
Lot of productsin market
Kind of cropscultivated are
uniformed
Difficult tointroduce new
crop
Lack of seeds
Difficult to getgood seeds
No KIOS forseeds
distribution
Crops aredamaged by pest
and disease
Splayers are notsufficientlyavailable
Pestcide areexpensive
Lack of cropmaintenance
Farmers arelacking intechnology
Farmers areshort in
creativity
Farmer groupsare not active
PPL visitsvillage
insufficiently
Farmers followtraditionaltechnology
Farmers arelacking in farm
planning
Low quality ofproducts
F - III - 16
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(2) Village road improvement approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement
(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach
(5) Farmers' organization activation approach
(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
(7) Land certification program promotion approach
Figure III-12 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Mekarjaya
Farmers havecollateral
Farmers' land iscertificated
Farmers areinterested in
credit
No economiccrisis of
Indonesia
Banks Interestrates are low
Farmer groupshave saving
Farmers haveknowledge in
saving
Procedure ofloan is easy
Crop productionincrease
Farmers' incomeincrease
Farmers are rich
Core ObjectiveEnough Capitalin farm H'holds
Easy tomaintain crops
Compostfertilizer is
enough
Enough laboris available
Sufficiency ofseeds
Cultivated landincrease
Farmers canbuy cow
Farmers can buyfarm inputs
Farmers canhire farm labor
Farmers canbuy animal
Farmers canbuy pump
Water issufficient in dry
season
Enough watersource in dry
season
No irrigationfacility isavailable
There is Gov.irrigation deve.
project
Village locationis close tonearby city
More PPLguidance isavailable
Farmers havesufficient
technology
Gov. agricul.deve. Project is
available
Production ishigh
Success in cropharvest
Middlemenwant to buy
farmersproducts
Middlemen getprofit
Products pricesare not
fluctuated
High quality ofproducts
Different cropsare harvested
Farmers follownew
technology
Differentcropping
pattern in wetseason
High price ofproducts
KIOS is closeto purchase
input
Pest/diseasedamage is low
Sufficientapplication offarm inputs
Price of farminputs is cheap
Farmers' incomeis high
Forest isconserved
Banks believefarmers
(2)
Farmers areeasy to get
credit
(1)
(3) (4)
(5)
(6) (7) (5)
F - III - 17
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement
(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach
(5) Farmers' organization activation approach
(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
(7) Land certification program promotion approach
Figure III-13 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Langensari
Farmers'income isincreased
Differentcropping pattern
is practiced
Prices ofproducts are
stable
Crop season islong
Crop diseasesare decreased
Price ofproducts isincreased
Quality ofproducts isincreased
Sufficient PPLguidance is
provided
Sufficienttechnology in
seed production
Good quality ofchemical isavailable
Capital issufficient infarm h'hold
Farmers canhire farm labor
Many farmersare employed
Quality ofproducts
become high
Farmers' becomepoor
Many farmersbecome good
people
Easy to getcredit from
banks
Farmers havesufficientcollareral
Farmers canbuy land
Farmers havemore land for
cultivation
Farmers getmore profit &
income
Production isstable
Banks believefarmers
More servicesfrom bank
Vegetable priceis increased
Farmers havecultivationtechnique
KUD isavailable forcollection of
products
Lesscompetition in
crop production
KUD isavailable formarketing of
products
Crop productionis increased
Chiep farminputs areavailable
More farminputs are used
Farmers cancultivate in dry
season
Farmer can usewater source
Farmers haveirrigation pump
Irrigationfacility isavailable
Sufficient wateris available in
dry season
Farmers canbuy farm tools
Farmers caneasily buy farm
inputs
Farmers cancultivate more
area
Production isincreased
Farmers can getbenefit
Farmers canmaintain crops
marketing ofproducts
become good
Farmers cancontinuefarming
Farmers' incomeincrease
Core Objective
(3)
(4)
(6)
(7)(1)
Farmers haveproper tech. In
cropping(5)
(5)
F - III - 18
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach(5) Farmers' organization activation approach
(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
Figure III-14 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Tugumukti
Enough Income
Higheremployment in
dry season
Farmers usepump forirrigation
Farmers havecapital forinvestment
Farmers haveskill for other
works
Farmers haveland for cropproduction
Enough waterin dry season
Farmers haveenough capital
Farmers haveirrigationfacility Crops are not
damaged bypest/disease
Spraying iseffectively
done
Spraying isregularly done
Climate issuitable
More use ofchemical
Farmers'motivation towork is high
Not muchrainfall
Price ofchemical is
stable
Farmers havesufficient
capital
Sufficientwater isavailable
Croppingseason is not
limited
Differentcroppingseason
Croppingpattern isimproved
Croppinginformation inother areas are
available
Products aredifferent from
other areas
Proper amountof production
Good quality ofproducts
Stable price ofproducts
Educationlevel is
improved
PPL visits morefrequently(1/2weeks)
Farmers havean adequatetechnique
Good quality ofseeds
Farmers'technical level
is adequate
Farmers havesufficient
capital
Soil is notdried up
Irrigationcanal isinstalled
Sufficientwater isavailable
Water sourceis close from
the farm
Field isirrigated
Dry seasonperiod is not
long
Wind is stableif wind
protection isestablished
Sufficientharvest in wet
season
Sufficientproduction
Enough capitalfor investment
Easy to buyfertilizer
Easy to buychemical
Easy to buyseeds
Farmers canbuy land
Easy to buyfarm tools
Enough food
Less pest/disease
Farmers cancrop cultivation
EnoughProduction
Core Objective
Farmersbecome healthy
Sufficientharvest in dry
season
Farmers cancropping in the
field
Qualified seedis bought at
KIOSK
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(5) (6) (1)
F - III - 19
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach(2) Village road improvement approach(3) Vegetable production technology improvement(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach(5) Farmers' organization activation approach(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach(7) Land certification program promotion approach
Figure III-15 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Gekbrong
Core Objective
Capital is enoughin farm
households
Easy to borrowland
Easy to buy farminputs
High income infarm h'holds
Easy to carry outfarmingSuccess in
farming
Farmers arehappy
Easy to buy land
Farmers are rich
Farmers haveland
Interest rate islow in informal
loan
KUD is availablefor the villagers
KUT is available
Training tofarmer groups is
given
PPL havemotorcycle
PPL visitsvillage
sufficiently
Farmers group isavailable
Saving group isavailable
PPL is near tovisit
Farmers havecollateral
Banks believefarmers
There is landcertification
project
Farmers haveland certificate
High Income
Irrigation canalis available
Water is enoughin dry season
Water storagedam is available
Success inharvest
High cropproduction
Small insectdamage
Sufficient cropmaintenance
Sufficient pestcontrol
Proper rotationof cropping
pattern
High quality ofproducts
KUD isavailable
(bankrupt)
Low price offarm inputs
Different cropsare harvested in
a same time
High price ofproducts
Market issufficientlyavailable
Proper amountof production
Transportationmeans are
available more
Easy to getcredit
Farmers havecrop technology
Road conditionis improved
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1) (7) (5)
(6)
F - III - 20
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach(5) Farmers' organization activation approach(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
(9) Agro-processing industry development approach
Figure III-16 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Cisurupan
High price ofvegetables in
market
Farmerscultivate variety
of crops
Farmers practicegood cropping
pattern
Farmers don'tfollow marketprices in crop
selection
There is basicprice policy for
vegetables
Core ObjectiveHigh income infarm households
Farmers becomehealthy
Farmers are easyto buy food
Small number ofjobless farmers
Farmers are easyto buy farm
inputs
Farmers haveenough
cultivated land
Farmers cancontinue farming
Decreasing poorfarmers
Properexpenditure for
farm inputs
Proper dosage ofchemicals
Farmers can gettrainingprogram
Farmers havesufficient farm
tools
Small cropdamage frompest/ disease
Farmers havesufficient
technology
PPL is active invillage
Gov. support forinvestment is
available
High productionof vegetables
Enoughfertilizer
application
Sufficient wateris available in
dry season
Cheap price offarm inputs
Water flow intraditional canal
Irrigation canalis in goodcondition
Irrigation canalis improved
DINAS PU,Kab. is active in
village
Sufficient capitalis available
Have enoughtechnology
There areprocessingactivities
Have trainingprogram
Industry office,Kab. Is active in
village
(3)(4)
(5)(6)
(9)
(1)(5)
F - III - 21
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach(5) Farmers' organization activation approach(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach(7) Land certification program promotion approach(8) Farm road improvement approach
Figure III-17 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Tanjungkarya
Core ObjectiveEnough capital infarm households
More seedapplication
Crops are notattacked by pest
More fertilizerapplication
More applicationof pesticide
Farmers can buyenough pesticide
Farmers can buyenough seeds
Farmers can buyenough pesticide
Farmers getprofit
Stabilized priceof vegetables
Farm road isavailable
Fieldtransportation is
cheap
Farmers cancultivate highquality vegeta.
Farmers can buylow price of
seedsVegetables are
not damaged bypest/decease
High price ofvegetables
Good quality ofvegetables
Cropmaintenance isproperly done
Labor is enoughin village
PPL visits villagesufficiently
High productionof crops
Farmers cancultivate in dry
season
Farmers havesufficient
technologySoils are fertile
Enough water indry season
Irrigation systemis available in
village
Easy to getcredit
Farmers havecollateral
Banks trustfarmers
Cheap cost tomake certificate
Farmers haveland certificate
Farmers haveland
Traders provideloan to farmers
Farmers getprofit
Farmers repay totraders
Enoughcultivated land
Enough cropproduction
Enough incomein farm h'holds
Crops arecultivated undergood condition
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Application offarm inputs is
sufficient
(3)
(1)
F - III - 22
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement
(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach
(5) Farmers' organization activation approach
(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
(7) Land certification program promotion approach
Figure III-18 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Mekarmukti
Core ObjectiveCapital is short infarm households
Farmers cancontinue farmingProduction
increase
Farmers arehealth
Farmers' incomeincrease
Farmers are notlazy
Farmers are rich
Land isproductive
High income infarm households
Vegetables arenot damaged by
pest/disease
High price ofvegetables
High quality ofvegetables
Enough cropmaintenance
Farmers havetechnology for
vege. cultivation
Farmers receiveenough
extension
Improved seedsfor vegetablesare available
Sufficient supplyof farm inputs in
KIOS
Sufficientapplication offarm inputs
Enough farmtools
Cheap price offarm inputs
High cropproduction
Enough water indry season
Water flows inirri. canal
Enoughcultivation landin dry season
Sedimentation indam is removed
Irrigation dam isrehabilitated
Irrigation canalis rehabilitated
No soil erosionover the canal
Big stone in thecanal is removed
Farmers canrehabilitate
irrigation canal
Support forcapital isavailable
Budget forrehabilitation is
available
Paddy is notdamaged bypest/disease
Farmers are easyto borrow
capital
Banks believefarmers
Farmers haveland certificate
Governmentsupport isavailable
Farmers havecollateral
Farmers havelarge cropproduction
Farmers canyear-roundcropping
Farmers canrepay loan
Farmers don'thave debt
Farmers cancontrol hunger
Cultivated landis increased
Farmers can buyfarm input
High laboropportunity
Farmers arebankrupt
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(1)
(5)
(1)
(5)(5)
F - III - 23
(1) Irrigation facility improvement/development approach
(2) Village road improvement approach
(3) Vegetable production technology improvement
(4) Vegetable products quality improvement approach
(5) Farmers' organization activation approach
(6) Agricultural supporting service improvement approach
Figure III-19 Objective Tree with Identified Project Approaches in Cisantana
(1)
Farmers havesufficient income
Easy to getstabilized price
of products
Farmers havecapital
Farmers can buysufficient farm
inputs
Enough cropmaintenance
Products' qualityand quantity can
compete inmarket
High income infarm households
Farm inputs aresufficient
Farmers canimprove farming
technique
Cultivation areais increased
Farmers havesavings
Farmers havefunds for health
care
Farmers havesmall debts
Farmers canrepay KUT
Farmers canwork
Farmers have jobFarmers have
prosperity
High productionof crops
Gov. supportfarmers in group
establishment
Goodmaintenance isdone by farmers
Farmers areinterested ingroup work
Farmers don'tdepend on
expensive inputs
Soil condition(PH) is normal
Optimumsupply of
chemical input
Sufficient inputof compost
fertilizer
Gov. suggestsproperly to
improvecondition
Farmers cancropping in all
season
Irrigationfacility isimproved
Farmers can buyenough fertilizer
Fertilizer price ischeap
Cheap fertilizeris available
Farmers useenough fertilizer
Road conditionis good
Middlemen'sprices are
competitive
Manymiddlemen are
available
Middlemen fromoutside can
come to village
Cropping patternis different
Products arelimited in market
A variety ofcrops arecultivated
Easy tointroduce new
crop
Sufficient seedsare available
Easy to get goodseeds
KIOS isavailable forseeds supply
Crops are notdamaged by pest
and disease
Splayers aresufficientlyavailable
Pestcide arecheap
Sufficient cropmaintenance
Farmers havesufficient
technology
Farmers arecapable and
active
Farmer groupsare active
PPL visitsvillage
sufficiently
Farmers followimproved
technology
High quality ofproducts
Core Objective
(2)(3)
(4)(5)
(6)
(5)
(5)Farmers aresufficient in
farm planning
F - III - 24