Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Entergy Operations, Inc.
JJLn~tergy 1448 SR 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Tel 501 858 5000
1CAN100201
October 10, 2002
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Station OP1-17 Washington, DC 20555
Subject: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-313 License No. DPR-51 ANO-1 Cycle 18 COLR
Dear Sir or Madam:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit I (ANO-1) Technical Specification 5.6.5 requires the submittal of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for each reload cycle. Attached is Revision 0 of the ANO-1 Cycle 18 COLR. Please note that the approved revision number of the Babcock and Wilcox Topical Report BAW-10179P-A is identified in the COLR as August 2001. This completes the reporting requirement for the referenced specification. This submittal contains no commitments. Should you have any questions, please contact David Bice at 479-858-5338
Sincerely,
Sherrie R. Cotton Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance
SRC/dbb Attachment: ANO-1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
I CAN100201 Page 2 of 2
cc: Mr. Ellis W. Merschoff Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064
NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P.O. Box 310 London, AR 72847
Mr. William Reckley NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO-1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 0-7 D1 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Attachment
ANO-1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
"- I ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
ENTERGY OPERATIONS
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE UNIT ONE
CYCLE 18
CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT
Page 1 of 30 Rev. 0
- ANO Unit I Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report Page 2 of 30 CALC-01-R-1005-04 Rev. 0
1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS
This Core Operating Limits Report for ANO-1 Cycle 18 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 5.6.5. The core operating limits have been developed using the methodology provided in the reference.
The following cycle-specific core operating limits are included in this report:
1) 2.1.1 Variable Low RCS Pressure - Temperature Protective Limits, 2) 3.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN (SDM), 3) 3.1.8 PHYSICS TESTS Exceptions - MODE 1, 4) 3.1.9 PHYSICS TEST Exceptions - MODE 2, 5) 3.2.1 Regulating Rod Insertion Limits, 6) 3.2.2 AXIAL POWER SHAPING RODS (APSR) Insertion Limits, 7) 3.2.3 AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Operating Limits, 8) 3.2.4 QUADRANT POWER TILT (QPT), 9) 3.2.5 Power Peaking, 10) 3.3.1 Reactor Protection System (RPS) Instrumentation, 11) 3.4.1 RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow DNB limits, 12) 3.4.4 RCS Loops -MODES 1 and 2, and 13) 3.9.1 Boron Concentration.
2.0 REFERENCES
1. "Safety Criteria and Methodology for Acceptable Cycle Reload Analysis," BAW-10179PA, Rev. 4, Framatome ANP, Lynchburg, Virginia, August 2001.
2. Letter dated 4/9/02 from L W. Barnett USNRC to J.M. Mallay FRA-ANP, "Safety Evaluation of Framatome Technologies Topical Report BAW- 10164P Revision 4, 'RELAP5/MOD2- B&W, An Advanced Computer Program for Light Water Reactor LOCA and Non-LOCA Transient Analysis' (TAC Nos MA8465 and MA8468)," USNRC ADAMS Accession Number ML0 13390204.
3. RELAP5/MOD2-B&W - An Advanced Computer Program for Light Water Reactor LOCA Transient Analysis, BAW-10164P, Rev. 4, Framatome Technologies, Inc., Lynchburg, Virginia, September 1999.
4. "Qualification of Reactor Physics Methods for the Pressurized Water Reactors of the Entergy System," ENEAD-01-P, Rev. 0, Entergy Operations, Inc., Jackson, Mississippi, December 1993.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report Page 3 of"30 CALC-01 -R- 1005-04 Rev. 0
Table Of Contents Page
REACTOR CORE SAFETY LIMITS Fig 1 Variable Low RCS Pressure-Temperature Protective Limits ............................. 4 Fig 2 AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE protective Limits .............................................................. 5
SHUTDOW N M ARGIN (SDM ) ............................................................................................................... 6 REGULATING ROD INSERTION LIMITS
Fig 3-A Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Four-Pump Operation From 0 to 200 ± 10 EFPD ................................................ 7
Fig 3-B Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Four-Pump Operation From 200 ±:10 EFPD to EOC ....................................................................................... 8
Fig 4-A Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Three-Pump Operation From 0 to 200 ± 10 EFPD .............................................................................................. 9
Fig 4-13 Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Three-Pump Operation From 200 ±:10 EFPD to EOC ............................................ 10
Fig 5-A Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Two-Pump Operation From 0 to 200 ±:10 EFPD ............................................ 11
Fig. 5-13 Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Two-Pump Operation From 200 ± 10 EFPD to EOC ........................... .......................................................... 12
AXIAL POWER SHAPING RODS (APSR) INSERTION LIMITS ............................................................ 13 AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE OPERATING LIMITS
Fig 6-A AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Four-Pump O peration .......................................................................................................................... 14
Fig 6-B AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum In-Core Conditions for Four-Pum p Operation ................................................................................................. 15
Fig. 6-C AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Ex-Core Conditions for Four-Pump O peration ......................................................................................................................... 16
Fig. 7-A AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Three-Pump O peration .......................................................................................................................... 17
Fig 7-B AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum In-Core Conditions for Three-Pump Operation ............................................................................................... 18
Fig 7-C AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Ex-Core Conditions for Three-Pump O peration ............................................................................................................... . 19
Fig 8-A AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Two-Pump O peration .......................................................................................................................... 20
Fig 8-B AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum In-Core Conditions for Two-Pum p Operation ................................................................................................... 21
Fig 8-C AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Ex-Core Conditions for Two-Pump Operation .................................................... 22
QUADRANT POWER TILT LIMITS AND SETPOINTS .......................................................................... 23 POWER PEAKING FACTORS
Fig 9 LOCA Linear Heat Rate Limits ............................................... 24 D N B Pow er Peaking Factors ................................................................................................................. 25
REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (RPS) INSTRUMENTATION Fig. 10 RPS Maximum Allowable Setpoints for Axial Power Imbalance ........................ 26 Fig. 11 RPS Variable Low Pressure Temperature Envelope Setpoints .............................................. 27
RCS PRESSURE, TEMPERATURE, AND FLOW DNB SURVEILLANCE LIMITS ............... ............. 28 R CS L O O PS M O D E 1 A N D 2 .......................................................................................................................... 29 REFUELING BORON CONCENTRATION ........................... . .................... 30
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 2.1.1.3
Figure 1.
23nl
-2100
0.
0
100
1700610 640
PUMPS OPERATING (TYPE OF LIMIT) GPM* POWER** Four Pumps (DNBR Limit) 369,600 (100%) 110% Three Pumps (DNBR Limit) 276,091 (74.7%) 89% One Pump in Each Loop (DNBR Limit) 181,104 (49%) 62.2% * 105% of Design Flow (2.5% UNCERTAINTY INCLUDED IN STATISTICAL DESIGN LIMIT) **AN ADDITIONAL 2% POWER UNCERTAINTY IS INCLUDED IN STATISTICAL DESIGN LIMIT
Page 4 of 30 Rev. 0
Variable Low RCS Pressure--Temperature Protective Limits
34*JV
1 R•-WM LCP
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 5 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 2.1.1 Bases
Figure 2. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Protective Limits (measurement system independent)
(-48.9, 112.0)
ACCEPTABLE 4 PUMP OPERATION
(-48.9, 88.5)
ACCEPTABLE 3&4 PUMP OPERATION
(-48.9, 61.3)
ACCEPTABLE 2,3&4 PUMP OPERATION
I �14. I WI I
-40 -20
Axial Power Imbalance, %
120 -
1�(50.2, 112.0)
100 +
*1.(50.2, 88.5):
so +
(.57.8,99.9
(-57.8,76AI
(.57.8, 49.)
(-57.8, 0)
4
(60.2, 61.3)9
'(57.0, 104.2)
(57.0, 80.7)
(57.0, 53.5)
(57.0, 0)
V [ 40 0
H 20.
-80 -60 0 20 40 60 80
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 6 of 30 Rev. 0
LIMITS ARE REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.1.8, 3.1.9, AND 3.3.9
SHUTDOWN MARGIN (SDM)
Verify SHUTDOWN MARGIN per the table below.
REQUIRED TECHNICAL APPLICABILITY SHUTDOWN SPECIFICATION
MARGIN REFERENCE
MODE 1 I %Ak/k 3.1.4, 3.1.5
MODE 2 1 %Ak/k 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.3.9
MODE 3* > 1 %Ak/k 3.1.1, 3.3.9
MODE 4* 1%Ak/k 3.1.1, 3.3.9
MODE5* >1%Ak/k 3.1.1, 3.3.9
MODE 1 PHYSICS TESTS Exceptions* >__ 1%Ak/k 3.1.8
MODE 2 PHYSICS TESTS Exceptions _ 1 %Ak/k 3.1.9 *Requires actual shutdown margin to be > 1 %Ak/k.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01 -R- 1005-04
Page 7 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 3-A.
110
100
90 j
0
0
P-4
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Regulating Rod Insertion 0 to 200 ± 10 EFPD
Limits for Four-Pump Operation From
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0
20 40 60 80 I I I 1
GROUP 6100
I
0 1
20 1
0 1
40 1
20 1
60 1
80 I
80 1
40 60 R 1
GROUP 5
GROUP 7100
I
01
I II i
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 8 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 3-B.
110
100
90
80
0
0
Coo
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Four-Pump Operation From 200 ± 10 EFPD to EOC
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 30C
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0
0 1
0 1
20 1
40 60 G 1
GROUP 5
20 1
80 1
40 60 G 6
GROUP 6
20 1
80 1
40 60 G 1
GROUP 7
80 1
100
100 I
100 I
I I-4--
00
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report Page 9 of 30 CALC-01-R-1005-04 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 4-A. Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Three-Pump Operation From 0 to 200 ± 10 EFPD
110
100OPERATION IN THIS
90- REGION IS NOT ALLOWED
80 - (264.8, 77) S(104.5, 77) (300, 77)
70 SHUTDOWN /8 ,
MARGIN (248.5, 67) " C 6LIMIT \
44 .. • .(248.5, 8)
c4 0
30
20- EMSIL SOPERATING
171.65REGION 10
S (0, 2.7)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0. 20 40 60 80 100 SI I I I I
GROUP 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 III I I I
GROUP 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 I I I I I I
GROUP 5
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 10 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 4-B.
110
100
90
80
00 C-4
f4 -4 0
1Z
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Three-Pump Operation From 200 ± 10 EFPD to EOC
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0
0 1
20 1
40 1
60 1
20 1
80 1
40 60 R 7
GROUP 7
100 I
GROUP 60 1
20 1
40 60 G 1
GROUP 5
80 1
100 I
280 300
80 I
100 I
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 11 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 5-A.
110
100
(4-.
O0
0
0
Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Two-Pump Operation From 0 to 200 ± 10 EFPD
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0
0 1
0 1
20 1
40 60 R 1
GROUP 5
20 1
80 1
40 60 G 6
GROUP 6
20 1
80 1
40 60 G 1
GROUP 7
80 1
100 I
100 I
100
IjI l
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 12 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.1
Figure 5-B.
110
100.
Regulating Rod Insertion Limits for Two-Pump Operation From 200 ± 10 EFPD to EOC
90+
80+
70
60(-q
0
0 QD o
50 .
40
30
20
10.
0.0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Rod Index, % withdrawn
0
40 1
60 1
20 40 60 80 100 I I I I I
80 1
100 I
GROUP 6
I I I I] GROUP 5
OPERATION IN THISREGION IS NOT 1265.8. 521
ALLOWED (207.0, 2) (300,52)
• A _.... - OPERATION (248.5, MARIN/'• RESTRICTED_... (248.5,38)
7_ • PERMISSIBLE
7 95.6,S) OPERATING S(0, 0.0) , , REG IO , , ,
0 1
0 1
20 1
20 1
40 1
60 1
80 1
GROUP 7
100 I
"ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report Page 13 of 30 CALC-01-R-1005-04 Rev. 0
LIMITS ARE REFERRED TO BY
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.2
AXIAL POWER SHAPING RODS (APSR) Insertion Limits
Up to 470 ± 10 EFPD, the APSRs may be positioned as necessary for transient imbalance control, however, the APSRs shall be fully withdrawn by 480 EFPD. After the APSR withdrawal at 470 -10 EFPD, the APSRs shall not be reinserted.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 14 of 30 Rev. 0 1
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 6-A. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Four-Pump Operation
110 T
(-33.9
(.22.08, 102)
(-27.58,92)
9,8
RESTRICTED
REGION
I I-0 -50 -40
(-34.22, 604
4.100 4
90+
80+
O0
0 0
P_(
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
21.53, 102)
(27.36,.92)
33.87, 80)
704-
60+
404
30+PERMISSIBLE
OPERATING REGION
20+
10+
(34.13,60)
RESTRICTED REGION
-a . I I I I
Axial Power Imbalance, %
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
- ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 15 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 6-B. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum InCore Conditions* for Four-Pump Operation
110
(-13.71, 102)
(-18.74, 92)
(.24.74, 80
(-25.44, 60)
RESTRICTED REGION
90
80
70
'0
0
0
A-4
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
60
50
40
30
20
10
(13.37, 102)
(1.66, 92)
(24.74, 90)
(25.44, 60)
RESTRICTED REGION
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Axial Power Imbalance, %
Assumes that no individual short emitter detector affecting the minimum in-core imbalance
calculation exceeds 60% sensitivity depletion, and that no individual long emitter detector exceeds 73% sensitivity depletion, or both. The imbalance setpoints for the minimum in-core system must be reduced by 2.80 %FP at the earliest time-in-life that this assumption is no longer valid.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-0 1-R- 1005-04
Page 16 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 6-C. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Excore Conditions for Four-Pump Operation
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
Axial Power Imbalance, %20 30 40 50
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 17 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 7-A.
(-34.22,60),
(-34.39, 46)1
RESTRICTED REGION
AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Three-Pump Operation
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
110
100
90
(.22.36,80
70
60
4-4
0
0 0.
(34.01,69)
1(34.13, 60)
RESTRICTED REGIONPERMISSIBLE
OPERATING REGION
50
40
30
20
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
10
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 7-B. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum InCore Conditions* for Three-Pump Operation
110
100
90
80(.14.39, 77)
70
(.25.44,
(.25.97, 45)
RESTRICTED REGION
60
50
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
0o
0
t-.
40
30
20
10
(14.05,77)
(24.78, 69)
(25.44, 60)
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
(25.97, 45)
RESTRICTED REGION
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Assumes that no individual short emitter detector affecting the minimum in-core imbalance calculation exceeds 60% sensitivity depletion, and that no individual long emitter detector exceeds 73% sensitivity depletion, or both. The imbalance setpoints for the minimum in-core system must be reduced by 2.80 %FP at the earliest time-in-life that this assumption is no longer valid
Page 18 of 30 Rev. 0
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 19 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 7-C. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Ex-Core Conditions for Three-Pump Operation
110 -
100 4
90-I
(-16.72, 77)
(.28.12,69)
(.28.43, 60),
(-28.92, 45)
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
N 0
0 914
80+
70+
60+
(.16.22. 77)
S((28.02, 69)
(28.33, 60)
40±
30±PERMISSIBLE
OPERATING REGION
204.
10 -I
1(28.84,45)
RESTRICTED REGION
-50 -40 -30
RESTRICTED REGION
-20 -100 1 0 20 30 40 so
ANO Unit I Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 20 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 8-A. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Full In-Core Conditions for Two-Pump Operation
110
100+
90g
80o-I
70-
604-
(-22.65, 52!
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
+504-
(22.17, 52)
(34.31,46)
404-
00
ý0
,0~
oo
Po
304-PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
20+
10+
(34.38,40)
(34.51, 30)
RESTRICTED REGION
-50 40 -30 -20 -10
(-34.38, 461
(-34.44, 40)1
(-34.56, 30)#
RESTRICTED REGION
4
0 10 20 30 40 50
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 21 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 8-B. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Minimum InCore Conditions* for Two-Pump Operation
110
100
90
80
70
60
(-15.19, 62)
(-25.51,
(-26.14, 40)
PERMISSIBLE (-26A9, 30) OPERATING
f REGION
RESTRICTED REGION
0 0ý
kn N
C"
0
40
30
20
10
(14.82, 62)
(25.48,46)
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
ý (26.14, 40)
(26.49, 30)
RESTRICTED REGION
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Assumes that no individual short emitter detector affecting the minimum in-core imbalance calculation exceeds 60% sensitivity depletion, and that no individual long emitter detector exceeds 73% sensitivity depletion, or both The imbalance setpoints for the minimum in-core system must be reduced by 2.80 %FP at the earliest time-in-life that this assumption is no longer valid.
ANO Unit I Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 22 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.2.3
Figure 8-C. AXIAL POWER IMBALANCE Setpoints for Ex-Core Conditions for Two-Pump Operation
110
100
90
80
70
60
(-17.54, 52)
(-28.89,,
40
(-29.40, 30)
RESTRICTED REGION
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
17.06, 52)
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION
00
0
0•
P-
PERMISSIBLE OPERATING
REGION30
20
(28.81, 46)
(29.01,40)
(29.34, 30)
RESTRICTED REGION
10
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 23 of 30 Rev. 0
LIMITS ARE REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.2.4
Quadrant Power Tilt Limits And Setpoints
From 0 EFPD to EOCMeasurement System
Full In-core Detector System Setpoint
Minimum In-core Detector System Setpoint
Ex-core Power Range NI Channel Setpoint
Measurement System Independent Limit
Steady State Value (%) _<60 % RTP >60 % RTP
6.83 4.44
2.78*
4.05
7.50
1.90*
1.96
4.92
Maximum Value (%)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Assumes that no individual long emitter detector affecting the minimum in-core tilt calculation exceeds 73% sensitivity depletion. The setpoint must be reduced to 1.50% (power levels >60% FP) and to 2.19% (power levels _<60% FP) at the earliest time-in-life that this assumption is no longer valid.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 24 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.1.8 and 3.2.5
LOCA Linear Heat Rate Limits
10000 20000 30000 40000
Burnup (MWd/mtU)
50000 60000 70000
Figure 9.
19
18
17
g 16
• 14
13
12
11
6.021-ft (46000, 16.6)
(45000, 16.3) 2-5 - 4-264 and 7.779-(45000, 15.4)
0and 12-ft
(62000, 12.5)
. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
0
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 25 of 30 Rev. 0
LIMIT IS REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.1.8 and 3.2.5
DNB Power Peaking Factors
The following total power peaking factors define the Maximum Allowable Peaking (MAP) limits to protect the initial conditions assumed in the DNB Loss of Flow transient analysis
Axial Axial Peak 4 - Pump 3 - Pump Peak Location Operation Operation
X/L 1.1 0.2 2.028 2.028 1.1 0.4 2.021 2.021 1.1 0.6 2.008 2.008 1.1 0.8 1.985 1.985 1.3 0.2 2.515 2.515 1.3 0.4 2.486 2.486 1.3 0.6 2.411 2.411 1.3 0.8 2.252 2.252 1.5 0.2 2.973 2.973 1.5 0.4 2.786 2.786 1.5 0.6 2.596 2.596 1.5 0.8 2.422 2.422 1.7 0.2 3.117 3.117 1.7 0.4 2.921 2.921 1.7 0.6 2.727 2.727 1.7 0.8 2.560 2.560 1.9 0.2 3.237 3.237 1.9 0.4 3.024 3.024 1.9 0.6 2.841 2.841 1.9 0.8 2.675 2.675
iNote - me values aoove nave not oeen error correctea
The present T-H methodology allows for an increase in the design radial-local peak for power levels under 100% full power. The equations defining the multipliers are as follows:
I P/P = 1.00 P/Pro < 1.00 MAP Multiplier 1.0 1 + 0.3(1 - P/Pm)
Where P = core power fraction, and Pm = 1.00 for 4 pump operation, or
0.75 for 3-pump operation.
Total Peak
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 2.1.1.1, 2.1.1.2, and 3.3.1
Figure 10. Reactor Protection System Maximum Allowable Setpoints for Axial Power Imbalance
(-35.2, 107)
(47.1, 90.4
(-47.1, 63.3)
(-47.1, 35.8)
(47.1,0)
ACCEPTABLE 4 PUMP OPERATION
(-35.2, 79.9)
ACCEPTABLE 3&4 PUMP OPERATION
(-352. 52.41
ACCEPTABLE 2,3&4 PUMP OPERATION
(36.7, 79.9)-
I U
-20
(46.1, 94.7)
(46.1,67.6)
(46.1,40.1)
(46.1, 0)
Axial Power Imbalance, %
Flux / Flow Setpoint (% Power / % Flow)
Four Pump Operation 1.07 Three Pump Operation 1.07 Two Pump Operation 1.07
120 -
• i " f.(35.7. 1071-
100
I-i
0
H-
604-
4(35.7, 62.4)
404-
204-
-80 -60 -40 0 20 40 60 80
Page 26 of 30 Rev. 0
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 27 of 30 Rev. 0
Figure is referred to by Technical Specification 3.3.1
Figure 11. Reactor Protection System Variable Low Pressure Temperature Envelope Setpoints
Y I. I. Y
P=2355 PcIG
ACCEPTABLE OPERATION
2400
' 2200
cc
0f
I
ao 2000 0
LU
a,)
sig
.T'=618 *F
�u.9 9
>4
i !~ meiP=1800 PSIG
580
& 1.
600 620 640
Reactor Outlet Temperature, OF
-UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION
P = (16.25 Tout - 8063) p
1800
1600
560 660
ANO Unit I Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report Page 28 of 30 CALC-01-R-1005-04 Rev. 0
LIMIT IS REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.4.1
RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow DNB Surveillance Limits
Four-Pump Three-Pump Two-Pump Operation Operation Operation
Minimum RCS Hot Leg Pressure 2065.7 2063.9 Note 4 2099.1
(psig)Note 1 2 1 0 0 .9Note5
Maximum RCS Hot Leg Temperature 603.45 603.55 604.00
(OF) Note 2
Minimum RCS Total Flow 138. 1 0Note 6 1 0 3 .3 6 Note7 68.06 Note 8
(Mlbm/hr) Note 3 1 3 2 .9 6 Note9 99.50 Note 9 65.48 Note 9
Note 1 - Using individual indications P1021, P1023, P1038 and P1039 (or equivalent) from the plant computer
Note 2 - Using individual indications T1011NR, TI014NR, T1039NR, T1042NR, T1012, T1013, T1040 and T1041 or averages TOUTA, XTOUTA, TOUTB, XTOUTB, TOUT, XTOUT from the plant computer
Note 3 -- Using indication WRCFT (or equivalent) from the plant computer, and can be linearly interpolated between these values provided the T .. versus Power level curve is followed.
Note 4 -- Applies to the RCS loop with two RCPs operating
Note 5 -- Applies to the RCS loop with one RCP operating.
Note 6 -- For Tcold = 555.79°F.
Note 7 -- For Tcold = 555 69°F.
Note 8 -- For Tcold = 555.3 1IF.
Note 9 -- For Tcold = 580'F.
ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-01-R-1005-04
Page 29 of 30 Rev. 0
LIMIT IS REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.4.4
RCS Loops - Mode I and Mode 2
Nominal Operating Power Level (% Power)
Four Pump Operation 100
Three Pump Operation 75
Two Pump Operation* 49
*Technical Specification 3.4.4 does not allow indefinite operation in Modes 1 and 2 with only two pumps operating.
Page
29
of 30 I
Rev.
0 I
"- ANO Unit 1 Cycle 18 Core Operating Limits Report CALC-0 1-R-1005-04
Page 30 of 30 Rev. 0
LIMIT IS REFERRED TO BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3.9.1
Refueling Boron Concentration
The minimum required boron concentration (which includes uncertainties) for use during refueling as a function of EFPD is:
EOC 17 EFPD ppm
520 2433 522 2430 524 2427 526 2424 528 2421 530 2418 532 2415 534 2412 536 2409