Anomaly Spreadsheet Sample by Michelle

8/12/2019 Anomaly Spreadsheet Sample by Michelle

1/7

Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structural

1

2

CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Summary Report

CLIENT's Scope of Work Name

Rating : 1 - Bad 2 - Poor 3 - Moderate 4 - Good

Item

No. Unit

Component

InspectedAnomaly PHOTO / ANOMAL

Priority: A - Immediate Attention B - Within 3 months C - Within 6 months D - Between 12 to 18 months E - Little or No Attention

Prioritynspection Findings/Anomalies Recommendationsating

Date Inspected:


2/7


CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Summ



Item

No.Unit

Component

Inspected

Priority: A - Immediate Attention B - Within 3 months C - Within 6 months D - Between 12 to 18 months


7 GT 3 & 4 Manifold -GT4

Valve Approximately 75% coating failurenoted

There are a few areas of moderate

localized corrosion noted on thevalve body and some moderate to

heavy scaling observed on the top

2 3

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas withPowergen

approved coating

system

De-scale andrecoat

D C

8GT 3 & 4 Manifold -

GT4

6"Flanged

Connection100% coating failure

Heavily corroded flanged

connection with severe metal loss

and missing bolts

1 1

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas with

Powergen

approved coating

system

Before this

system goes into

service, these

flanges should

be replaced

A A

9 GT 3 4"Piping

Approximately 70% coating

failure overall with moderate to

heavy moss build up on the line

on the underside and

throughout in several areas

Slight corrosion in areas of

coating failure

3 4

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas with

Powergenapproved coating

system

De-scale and

recoat

D E


3/7


CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Summa



Item

No.Unit

Component

InspectedAn

Priority: A - Immediate Attention B - Within 3 months C - Within 6 months D - Between 12 to 18 months E


10 GT 3 4" FlangesApproximately 75% coating failure

noted

Moderate to heavy scaling with

metal loss at underside edges of

the flanges, in between the flanged

connections and around the bolt

heads at one flange

3 2

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas with

Powergen

approved coating

system

De-scale, re-

inspect, and

once acceptable,

recoat.

C D

11 GT 3 Instrument Support Approximately 25% coating failure

Moderate corrosion with flaking of

metal on the underside edges of the

clamp of the instrument support

3 3

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas with

Powergen

approved coating

system

Remove clamp,

de-scale, recoat

and replace

support

D D


4/7


CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Summary R



Item

No.Unit

Component

InspectedAnomaly

Priority: A - Immediate Attention B - Within 3 months C - Within 6 months D - Between 12 to 18 months E - Lit


12 GT 4 4"Piping System

Generally, the entire system is with

approximately 85% coating failure

including isolated areas of flaking

and heavy moss growth underside

piping throughout

At areas of failed coating, there is a

presence of light corrosion3 3

Clean, de-scale,inspect and

recoat affected

areas with

Powergen

approved coating

system

Clean offunderside and

other areas free

of moss. Clean,

de-scale and

recoat

D C 12


5/7

Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structura

CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Sum



Item

No.Unit

Component

Inspected



13 GT 4 Piping Support

Piping supports are with

approximately 40% coating failure

overall

The most northern pipe support isheavily corroded at the area just

under the support plate. On the 2

most northern supports, there is

evidence of movement noted from

the failed coating on the piping

3 2

Clean, de-scale,

inspect andrecoat affected

areas with

Powergen

approved coating

system

De-scale pipe

support and

inspect the

heavily corrodedarea's integrity.

Renew the

section if need

be and recoat

with Powergen

approved coating

system

C B

14 GT 4 4" FlangedConnections

100% coating failure Heavy scaling observed aroundthe nuts

2 2

Clean, de-

scale, inspect

and recoataffected areas

with Powergen

approved

coating system

De-scale,inspect and

recoat

C C

15 GT 4 1 " ValveApproximately 85% coating failure

on the flanged connections of this

valve

Deteriorated valve packing noted 3 2

Clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat affected

areas (excluding

flange gasket

seating area)with Powergen

approved coating

system

Change out

packing at next

carded

turnaround, but

monitor valve

gasketmeanwhile

through annual

inspections

D D


6/7

Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structural Coating Structu

CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Sum



Item

No.Unit

Component

Inspected



16 GT 5 Entire Piping System

There are numerous areas ofcoating failure noted throughout the

system such as runs, sags, "fish

eyes", mechanical damage and

failure due to contaminated

surfaces. Newly coated areas

exhibit many symptoms of poor

preparation and application of

coating techniques. Underside of

almost all the piping has moss build-

up (with corrosion) due to

condensate presence.

Underside of piping exhibits slight

corrosion developing due to

poor/lack of coating coverage and

the presence of moisture.

3 3

Clean free of

moss and all

contaminants, de-

scale and recoat

to Powergen

approved coating

system

Clean free of

moss and all

contaminants, de-

scale, inspect

and recoat

D D

17 GT 5 Piping Support

Evidence shows that the pipe

supports were not removed to

recoat the piping

Crevice corrosion is noted at some

of the contact areas between the

piping and piping support as well as

at some of the areas where is

visible at the clamps

3 3

Remove clamp,

clean, de-scale

and recoat as

per Powergen

approved coating

system

Remove clamp,

clean, de-scale,

inspect and

recoat

D C

18 GT 5


7/7


CLIENT

Inspection Findings, Anomalies & Recommendations Summary Report



Item

No.Unit

Component

InspectedAnomaly PHOTO / ANOM

Priority: A - Immediate Attention B - Within 3 months C - Within 6 months D - Between 12 to 18 months E - Little or No Attention


19 GT 5 19

20 GT 5 20

20 GT 5 21

Date Inspected:

Documents

Anomaly Spreadsheet Sample by Michelle