Click here to load reader
Upload
simon-amboise
View
191
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design Project 3 Simon AMBOISE
Buckling analysis of axially compressed columns
Case 1 : Analytical resultsCase 2 : Shell43 element presentation
Bending stressMaximum deflectionComparison with analytical results
Case 3 : Plane82 element presentation, bending stress and deflectionComparison with analytical results
Case 4 : Solid45 element, comparison with analytical resultsComparison with analytical results
Conclusion : Comparaison between these 4 cases
Presentation
Datas :Young’s Modulus: E = 2.105 MpaPoisson’s Ratio: ν = 0,3Rh = 400 MPaRe = 450 MPalength=3000 mmArea = 1800 mm²Thickness =10 mmHmax = 120 mm
Beam 189 element
2 cross-sections :
3 different measurements
t
ta
b b
a
a mm 70 95 110
b mm 120 95 80
Boundary condition:Down : FixedUp : 2 translations fixed, rotation and force’s axis allowed.
Theoretical calculations of the critical buckling load
( )2w
min2
cr
Hcr
w
min
l*kJ*E*Pcr
ss
RE*s
ils
AJi
π=
>
π=
=
= Radius of (inertia) gyration
Slenderness ratio
Critical slenderness
Critical buckling loadColumn effective length factor, forone end fixed and the other endpinned K = 0,7
T cross section : comparison
a [mm] b [mm] Jmin [mm4] i [mm] s sgr Pcr-calculated [kN] Pcr-ansys [kN]
70 120 295000 12,80191 234,3 70,24608 132,035 127,301
95 95 721562 20,02168 149,8 70,24608 322,953 310,581
110 80 979444 23,32671 128,6 70,24608 438,374 435,013
Conclution for T beam :-Variation between calculated Pcr and ANSYS Pcr < 5%-B dicreases Critical buckling load increases
T cross section : picture
L cross section : comparison
a [mm] b [mm] Jmin [mm4] i [mm] s sgr Pcr-calculated [kN] Pcr-ansys [kN]
70 120 415807,0324 15,19881 197,4 70,24608 186,105 177,973
95 95 624366 18,62445 161,1 70,24608 279,450 279,574
110 80 534585,7666 17,23346 174,1 70,24608 239,267 233,431
Conclution for L beam :-Variation between calculated Pcr and ANSYS Pcr < 5%- MaxCritical buckling load increases for b = a
JJJ
xyzzyy zzyyJJ
J 2
2
min
22+−
+=
−
T cross section : pictures
Conclusions
Higher min. moment of inertia Higher critical buckling load
Critical buckling load depend on the type of the cross section but almost its dimension.
Smaller element size : no change in result.