Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anticipating and Preventing Adverse Drug Events (ADEs):
Decreasing the Need to Rescue Hospitalized Patients from Opioid-related Complications
Ashley Meyers, BSN, RN-BC, PCCN-K
Craig Havican, BSN, RN
About Sparrow Health System» Sparrow Hospital - Lansing
» 733 beds
» 30,000 inpatient discharges
» Surgery: 8,162 IP, 12,776 OP
» 4,200+ births, Level 3 RNICU
» 117,000+ annual ED visits
» 960+ Providers, 6500+ Caregivers, 2300+ Volunteers
» Sparrow Specialty Hospital (LTACH)
» Sparrow Clinton, Ionia and Carson Hospitals
» Ambulatory clinics and services
2
Sparrow Offices» Ambulatory clinics – 60 locations, 400+ Providers » Outpatient visits – 590,000 visits/year» Variety of specialties and services
3
• Oncology• OB/Gyn• Orthopedics• Pain Management• Pediatrics• Perinatal• Surgery• Urgent Care• Weight Management• Wound and Hyperbaric
• Behavioral Health• Cardiology, CVT Surgery• Diabetes/Endocrinology• Family Medicine• FastCare Retail Clinics• Gastroenterology• Geriatrics / Senior Health• Infusion Centers• Internal Medicine• Nephrology• Neurology
Local Problem
» We are in an opioid public health emergency
» Opioid administration in hospitalized patients too often harms those it is intended to help (ADE)
» Inpatient administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone for overmedication is evidence of overuse or misuse
» Our data suggested that we could do better
» Timely identification and intervention for patients at risk or with early evidence of respiratory depression should help (effectiveness, safety, cost)
4
Local Problem
» Validated tools exist to decrease the risk of iatrogenic overdose
» Assessment of level of sedation
» Determination of opioid safety score
» Triggering interventions before naloxone rescue is required
» Well- designed, pervasively used EMR tools should help improve clinical outcomes and decrease costs
» No EMR-integrated tools and workflows to improve
5
Drivers to Take Action: 2012-2014
» Escalating national opioid crisis; Michigan’s ranking
» 10th in opioid prescribing, 18th in opioid deaths)
» Joint Commission Sentinel Alerts
» American Society for Pain Management Nursing Guidelines
» MHA Keystone Center Opioid ADE Prevention Initiative
6
Front-Line Nurses Leading the Way
» Sparrow Pain Resource Nurses (SPRNs) began looking at quality data in 2014
» Nearly 1% of patients we were treating with opioids in the hospital experienced opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) requiring naloxone rescue
» To improve this, we set a hospital goal to decrease the rate of OIRD requiring naloxone rescue using:
» People: Governance, leadership, clinicians, IT
» Processes: Policies, workflows, Lean methods, PDCA
» Technology: IT (EMR); devices (ETC02 - capnography)
7
8
Sparrow Baseline Data
• Sparrow rate of opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) as measured by percent of inpatients on opioids requiring naloxone rescue administration
• 2014: 0.72%
• 2015: 0.73% and increasing
9
Narcotics Accounting for Naloxone Use
Fentanyl Hydrocodone/APAP
Hydromorphone Morphine
Oxycodone
2015 Naloxone Rate Trend Before MOSS Implementation
» MOSS Documentation = 0%
10
Project Description and Goal
In acutely ill adult inpatients, does an EMR-integrated risk assessment tool aimed at preventing OIRD, implemented using
accepted nursing workflows, decrease the incidence of OIRD compared to no risk assessment, as measured by naloxone use?
Goal:
» Decrease IP naloxone rescue rate to ≤0.65%*
» Goal is not 0%; some patients will require naloxone rescue even with use of best practices
» Focus on appropriate use and preventive monitoring
11
* Benchmark for the 7 Caymich Michigan member hospitals, all 550+ beds
Benchmarks
» Naloxone Target Rate* = 0.65%» Numerator = # of patients receiving opioid & naloxone
» Denominator = # of patients receiving opioid (any route)
» Aligned with
» MHA Keystone Pain Management Collaborative
» Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN)
*Khelemsky et al., 2015, Caymich, 2017
12
Design and Implementation
» The knowledge tools we decided to use
» Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale (POSS)1
» Michigan Opioid Safety Score (MOSS)2
» The IT tool we decided to use: Epic, because it is…
» Key to our Sparrow Way and care transformation goals
» Where clinical care gets done…and documented
» How we deploy CDS: Risk scores, BPAs, nursing care plans
» If this works, we can share it with other Epic organizations
13
1. Pasero C. J Perianesth Nurs. 2009;23:186
2. Soto R, Yaldou B. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015;30:196
Design and Implementation
•Review literature•Identify best practices
•People, process, technology•Gather a guiding coalition•Communicate for buy-in
Decide what good looks like
•Assessment documentation•Scales & scores•Nursing care plans•CDS tools, displays•Policy-supported workflows
Build the solution in EMR •Application testing
•Integrated testing•MOSS education•FMEA, address findings•Policy implications
Test, Talk, Teach
•Nursing leadership sign-offs•EMR workflow training•Put into nursing practice•Measure, monitor, adjust
Go-live & PDCA
14
More about MOSS» Combines
» Health risk assessment
» Respiratory rate
» Modified POSS (mPOSS)
15
Soto R, Yaldou B. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015;30:196
A SWOT Analysis of Paper MOSS Deployment to Inform Our Conversion to EMR
16
Strengths• Supporting Literature• Pain Champions• Clear Assessment Times
Multimodal Pain Management Order Sets
Weaknesses• Double Documentation
(Paper & Electronic)• Turnover of RN/Nurse
Leadership
Opportunities• Improve Patient Safety• Increase RN autonomy • Decrease RRT• Decrease Narcan Use
Threats• Other competing pilots• Engagement
Sisco, Cooper, & Rayburn, 2014
From Paper to EMR
17
Preoccupation with Failure to Promote Success Every Step of the Way: FMEA*
Plan EMR Build Evaluate
Documentation Committee
Across applications
View for other disciplines
Method
Audience
Other Disciplines
Content
Go-Live Support
Timeline
Just in time education
Educate Implement
1 2 3 4 5
Key Stakeholders
Align with other initiatives
Timeline
Ongoing PI
Risk Mgmt reporting
PDCA follow-up plan
(Harpel & Giannini, 2014)
18
*FMEA = Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
How Health IT Was Used
» Use standard processes for nursing documentation (EMR flowsheets) to capture data for MOSS value
» Health risks: e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, age, other sedatives
» Respiratory rate: document once, use many times
» mPOSS sedation assessment
19
How Health IT Was Used
» Program the EMR to use nursing documentation to calculate the MOSS value
» Display the MOSS value where nurses can see and interpret it
» Provide usable, actionable clinical decision support (CDS) to drive best practices
20
MOSS Scoring and Action
21
How Health IT Was UsedNursing Documentation Display of MOSS Value
22
How Health IT Was Used
Clinical decision support
» Alerts, advises to add nursing care plan or exclusion
» Adds and opens care plan
Unit level reports
» Department managers
» Rapid Response Team (RRT) nurses
23
How Health IT Was Used: Care Plans
24
Value Derived: Improved ProcessesAdherence to Best Practice
25
Trai
ning
2
Policy
Req. Doc.
Trai
ning
1
Value Derived: Patient OutcomesSurpassed Naloxone Rate Benchmark (≤0.65%)
MeanNaloxone
Rate
Relative Change in Naloxone
Rate
# of Patients
Receiving Naloxone
Per Year
Mean IncidencePer Month
2014 0.72% NA 179 14.9
2015 0.74% 2.6% 174 14.5
2016 0.69% -3.2% 157 13
2017 0.51% -23.6% 113 9.4
2018 YTD* 0.60% -15.8% 68 9.7
26
*Data through July 2018
Value Derived: Patient OutcomesDeclining Naloxone Rescue Rate
27
Trai
ning
1
Trai
ning
2
Polic
y
Req.
Doc
.
Value Derived: Improved Processes & Outcomes
MOSS documentation Naloxone rate (Goal ≤0.65%)
28
• Lower morbidity• Fewer opioid ADEs
Value Derived: Cost Avoidance as a Result of Clinical Improvements
» Estimated cost per ADE*
» Non-ICU = $13,994; ICU = $19,685
29
* Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013; 4:S73-7.
Mean Naloxone Rate
Raw IncidencePer Year
Mean IncidencePer Month
Estimated Cost Avoidance
(Raw Incidence vs. Baseline Year)2014 0.72 179 14.9
2015 0.73 174 14.5 $70K - $98K
2016 0.69 157 13 $308K - $431K
2017 0.51 113 9.4 $924K - $1,293K
2018 YTD 0.6 58 9.6 $510K - 714K
2018 Projected $874K - 1,224K
• Fewer patients harmed = 142• Cost avoidance = $1.8M - $2.5M
External Recognition for Our IT-enabled Best Practice: Epic Clinical Program
30
External Recognition for Our IT-enabled Best Practice: ECRI Institute
» ECRI Institute - a nonprofit organization, dedicated to bringing applied scientific research in healthcare to uncover the best approaches to improving patient care, marrying experience and independence with the objectivity of evidence-based research
» MOSS program recognition» Better processes» Naloxone reductions» Greater staff comfort in
administering opioids safely» Criteria-based prescribing
restrictions (fentanyl)» Safer order sets (PCA)» Pushing nonpharmacologic pain
management modalities (e.g., heat and cold, aromatherapy, pet therapy)
31
Capital and Operational Expenses
» Capital expenses = $ 0
» Operational expenses = $57,375
32
Activity CostPI/Project Planning; 120 total hours $ 3,988 Committee work; 20 total hours $ 665 Live and online Nursing Education; 1.5 hours each $ 49,845 Go-Live Support; 40 total hours $ 1,329 EMR analyst time; 60 total hours $ 1,549 TOTAL $ 57,375
Lessons Learned
33
» Involve your frontline staff at the beginning
» Sense of ownership of the problem and solution
» Partner with IT team at the beginning ofimplementation planning
» One time education & training isn’t enough
» Include at-the-elbow support
» Technology and training do not ensure sustainability
» Need clear expectations and accountability
Thank you!
34