Appendix 1: Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report › documents › Volume 3_Appendices › Ap… · FINAL Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design

Appendix 1: Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report

Morrison Hershfield | 2440 Don Reid Drive, Ottawa, ON K1H 1E1, Canada | Tel 613 739 2910 Fax 613 739 4926 | morrisonhershfield.com

Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report

Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment – Wolfe Island Ferry & Docking Improvements

G.W.P. 4061-14-00

Presented to:

Sharon Westendorp Senior Environmental Planner

Ministry of Transportation 1355 John Counter Blvd., P.O. 4000 Kingston, ON K7L 5A3

Project No. 1150293.00 November 2, 2017

\\TOR01FP\DATA1\SHARED\PROJ\1150293\08 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT\ENVIRONMENTAL\NATURAL-SCIENCES\TERRESTRIAL\REPORTING\2017 IMPACTS ASSESSMENT\FINAL\WOLFE_IMPACT_REPORT_FINAL_NOV2_2017.DOCX

Morrison Hershfield | 2440 Don Reid Drive, Ottawa, ON K1H 1E1, Canada | Tel 613 739 2910 Fax 613 739 4926 | morrisonhershfield.com

TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment - Wolfe Island Ferry & Docking Improvements

City of Kingston and Township of Frontenac Islands

G.W.P. 4061-14-00

1150293.00

November 2017

Prepared By:

__________________ ____________________ Casey Little Bettina Henkelman Terrestrial Ecologist Terrestrial Biologist Morrison Hershfield Limited Morrison Hershfield Limited

_______________ ____________________ Kaitlyn York Deb Crawford Terrestrial Biologist Environmental Planner Morrison Hershfield Limited Morrison Hershfield Limited

FINAL Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment

Wolfe Island Ferry and Docking Improvements G.W.P. 4061-14-00

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4

1.1 Purpose 4

1.2 Description of Study Area 5

2. BACKGROUND AND APPROACH 5

2.1 Objectives 6

2.2 Background Data Collection 6

2.2.1 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry – Peterborough District 7

2.2.2 Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority 7

2.2.3 City of Kingston Official Plan 7

2.2.4 Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan 7

2.2.5 Background Information for Terrestrial, Herpetofauna, and Wildlife Species at Risk 7

2.3 Field Investigations 8

3. EXISTING TERRESTRIAL HABITAT 8

3.1 Bedrock and Soils 8

3.2 Wetlands 8

3.3 Vegetation Communities 9

3.3.1 Open Agriculture (OAG) 9

3.3.2 Open Aquatic (OA) 9

3.3.3 Treed Shoreline (SHT) 9

3.3.4 Rare Vegetation 9

3.4 Wildlife Habitat 14

3.4.1 Birds 14

3.4.2 Herpetofauna 14

3.4.3 Mammals 15

3.4.4 Insects 15

3.5 Species at Risk 15

3.6 Designated Natural Areas 20

3.7 Determination of Significance 20

3.7.1 Wetlands 20

3.7.2 Woodlands 20

3.7.3 Wildlife Habitat 22



Significant Wildlife Habitat: Seasonal Concentration Areas 22

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Rare Vegetation Communities and Specialized Habitat for Wildlife 22

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Habitat for Species of Conservation Concern 22

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Animal Movement Corridors 23

4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION 23

4.1 Terrestrial Habitat, Vegetation and Designated Areas 27

4.2 Designated Natural Areas 28

4.3 Migratory Birds 28

4.4 Species at Risk 28

4.4.1 SAR Turtles 29

4.4.2 Barn Swallow Mitigation 29

4.4.3 SAR Grassland Birds – Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark 30

4.5 Sediment and Erosion Control 30

5. PERMITS AND APPROVALS 31

6. CONCLUSIONS 32

7. REFERENCES 33

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Key Map of Study Areas 4

Figure 2: ELC Communities – Kingston Ferry Terminal Study Area 11

Figure 3: ELC Communities – Marysville Ferry Terminal Study Areal 12

Figure 4: ELC Communities – Dawson Point Ferry Terminal Study Area 13

Figure 5: Terrestrial Map – Kingston Ferry Terminal, Marysville Ferry Terminal, and Dawson Point Ferry Terminal Study Areas 21

Figure 6: Impact Areas – Kingston Ferry Terminal 24

Figure 7: Impact Areas – Marysville Ferry Terminal 25

Figure 8: Impact Areas – Dawson Point Ferry Terminal 26

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Location of Work 5

Table 2: Potential SAR in General Area and Likelihood of Presence in the Study Areas 17



LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Correspondence with Regulatory Agencies

APPENDIX B Official Plans

APPENDIC C Terrestrial Photographic Record

APPENDIX D Vegetation Communities Plant List

APPENDIX E Breeding Bird Atlas Data



- 4 -

1. INTRODUCTION

Morrison Hershfield Limited (MH) has been retained by the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) to complete a Terrestrial Ecosystem Impact Assessment Report for the preferred alternatives of the Wolfe Island Ferry Terminals. The investigations carried out at each location are part of the Wolfe Island Ferry and Docking Improvements Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study. This Group ‘A’ Study built upon the work already completed as part of the Wolfe Island Transportation Study: Planning Study Report, conducted by URS Canada Inc. in 2011. The study area, as shown in Figure 1, encompasses lands within the Township of Frontenac Islands and the City of Kingston within the County of Frontenac. The study area includes three (3) established Ferry Terminals:

Kingston Terminal in the City of Kingston;

Marysville Terminal on Wolfe Island; and

Dawson Point Terminal on Wolfe Island.

1.1 Purpose

This Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report has been prepared in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Environmental Reference for Highway Design (2013). This report provides a synopsis of the preferred alternatives at the Kingston Terminal, Marysville Terminal and Dawson Point Terminal as well as a summary of the terrestrial ecosystems existing conditions within these study areas as documented in the Terrestrial Ecosystems Existing Conditions Report completed by MH in 2016. Potential environmental impacts and mitigation strategies were determined based on existing conditions, environmental constraints and deficiencies.

Figure 1: Key Map of Study Areas



- 5 -

This project has been identified as a Group “A” project under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). A Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will be prepared and made available for review and comment upon completion of this study.

1.2 Description of Study Area

The environmental study areas surrounding the Kingston Terminal, Marysville Terminal and Dawson Point Terminal, are located at the mouth of the Upper St. Lawrence River/Lake Ontario Eastern Basin on both the mainland (Kingston) and Wolfe Island (Dawson Point, Marysville). The Kingston Terminal is located at the south end of Tragically Hip Way in the City of Kingston, at the confluence of the Cataraqui River and St. Lawrence River. Two ferry service routes exist, one from the Kingston Terminal to Marysville (Wolfe Island), which is typically the summer route operating from May to December, and the second from the Kingston Terminal to Dawson Point (Wolfe Island), typically the winter route operating from January to April.

The ferry route from the Kingston Terminal to the Marysville Terminal is approximately 5.3 km in distance, and the Terminal in Marysville is located at the north end of Centre St. near the intersection with County Rd. 96. The second ferry route from the Kingston Terminal to the Dawson Point Terminal is approximately 5.1 km in distance, and the Dawson Point Terminal is located at the north end of Dawson Point Rd, approximately 2.5 km east of the Marysville Terminal. The environmental study locations fall within two geographical Townships including Frontenac Islands (Marysville and Dawson Point) and City of Kingston (Kingston Terminal). Figure 1 illustrates the location of the study area/terminal locations associated with the Wolfe Island Ferry service.

Table 1 provides a summary of the three existing ferry terminal locations, including nearest right-of-way (ROW), UTM coordinate, proposed works, and Municipality/Township.

Table 1: Location of Work

Ferry Terminal Location

Nearest ROW

UTM Coordinate Proposed

Works Municipality/Township

Kingston Tragically Hip Way

18 T 382009 4898778

Docking Improvements

City of Kingston

Dawson Point Dawson Point Rd.

18 T 386106 4896766


Frontenac Islands

Marysville Main St. (County Rd. 96)

18 T 384846 4894512


Frontenac Islands

2. BACKGROUND AND APPROACH

This report has been prepared to document the existing terrestrial resources throughout the project study areas, and to assess the impacts on these resources in relation to the preferred terminal designs.



- 6 -

2.1 Objectives

The objectives of this Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment report are as follows:

Define the boundaries of the environmental features adjacent to the structures;

Identify and describe the character, natural attributes and functions of the environmental features and their relationship to the proposed designs;

Identify potential impacts of the designs on environmental features;

Recommend specific measures to mitigate potential impacts on environmental features; and

Outline a management plan to protect and enhance or rehabilitate environmental features prior to, during and following construction.

Morrison Hershfield’s Terrestrial Ecologists conducted biological and physical inventories as part of the Terrestrial Ecosystems Existing Conditions Report in 2015 and 2016. This information was used to: 1) Describe the existing conditions; 2) Delineate boundaries of environmentally sensitive areas; and 3) Provide background information.

2.2 Background Data Collection

Background information was initially gathered as part of the Terrestrial Ecosystems Existing Conditions Assessment Report by MH (2016). This information was reexamined as part of the Impact Assessment Report due to species and/or area designation changes. Additional source information (e.g. Official Plans) were reviewed and included in this report. For the purposes of this study, a number of online sources were also accessed. Correspondence was maintained throughout the project with the MNRF – Peterborough District Office.

Background information regarding the study area was collected and synthesized from the following sources:

Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC);

Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), Peterborough District Office;

Natural Heritage Reference Manual Natural Heritage Policies of the Provincial Policy Statement (MNRF, 2005);

Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (MNRF, 2000) and Eco-regional Criteria Schedule 6E (MNRF, 2015);

Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC);

Species at Risk (SARA) Public Registry (Environment Canada, 2011);

Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario (OBBA): 2001-2005 (Bird Studies Canada);

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas of Canada (Bird Studies Canada);

Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) Biodiversity database;

Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas (ORAA);

Ontario Butterfly Atlas (OBA);



- 7 -

Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario;

City of Kingston Official Plan (2010);

Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan (2013);

Traditional and local community ecological knowledge;

Land Information Ontario (LIO); and

Aerial photography.

2.2.1 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry – Peterborough District

Project notification and data request regarding terrestrial sensitivities and SAR were sent to the MNRF on August 10, 2015. This information was received from the MNRF – Peterborough District on August 27, 2015.

The MNRF noted a number of potential occurrences within the immediate area of the study areas, as well as SAR records within the general area.

All communications with MNRF have been included in Appendix A.

2.2.2 Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority

Of the three study locations, only the Kingston Terminal falls within a Conservation Authority jurisdiction. This terminal facility is within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA). The CRCA was unable to provide any specific information that pertained to any terrestrial SAR.

All communications with the CRCA have been included in Appendix A.

2.2.3 City of Kingston Official Plan

The City of Kingston Official Plan (2010) was consulted for sensitive and/or significant natural features surrounding the study area. See Appendix B for maps of identified natural features within the boundary of the City of Kingston.

2.2.4 Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan

The Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan (2013) was consulted for sensitive and/or significant natural features surrounding the study area. See Appendix B for maps of identified natural features within the boundary of the Township of the Frontenac Islands.

2.2.5 Background Information for Terrestrial, Herpetofauna, and Wildlife Species at Risk

SAR background data was requested from the MNRF Peterborough District Office. This was supplemented with additional data from various websites and internet sources, accessed on August 11, 2015, and September 1, 2015 as part of the Terrestrial Ecosystems Existing Conditions Report (2016). Listed websites and internet sources were re-examined on August 29, 2017 for new SAR records. The following sources were used for supplemental species information:



- 8 -

NHIC search within five (5) 1.0 km by 1.0 km square encompassing the project area: 18UP8198, 18UP8298, 18UP8494, 18UP8594, and 18UP8696;

A search of the OBBA for the period of 2001-2005 for the species recorded in square 18UP89;

A search of the ORAA for the period of 1995 and later for the species recorded in square 18UP89; and

A search of the OBA for the period of 1994 and before for the species recorded in square 18UP89.

2.3 Field Investigations

Field studies were conducted during an appropriate season and were consistent with methodologies outlined in the Environmental Reference for Highway Design (MTO, 2013). Field investigations were completed on September 14th, 2015 and May 17th, 2016 by MH Biologists to confirm existing conditions and documented in the Terrestrial Ecosystems Existing Conditions Report (2016).

The study area included those areas located within 120 metres (m) of the right-of-way (ROW) at each terminal location, all impacted areas, and any sensitive receptors at a distance greater than 120 m that are likely to be adversely affected, as per the Environmental Reference for Highway Design (MTO, 2013).

3. EXISTING TERRESTRIAL HABITAT

3.1 Bedrock and Soils

The study areas are located within Ecoregion 6E where the underlying bedrock is Paleozoic dolomite and limestone, mainly of Ordovician and Silurian ages. The eastern portion of the ecoregion, where the study area is located, is underlain by glaciomarine deposits resulting from the brief post-glacial incursion of salt water from the Champlain Sea along the St. Lawrence valley. (Crins et al, 2009). The Wolfe Island study area is located on the Shadow Lake Formation consisting of limestone, dolostone, shale, arkose, and sandstone.

There are two soil types within the study area; Lansdowne clay which consists calcareous lacustrine clays that are imperfectly drained and Farmington loam which consists of calcareous stony loam till that is well drained (Hoffman et al., 1959).

3.2 Wetlands

The Greater Cataraqui Marsh Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) is situated approximately 1 km upriver from the Kingston Ferry Terminal facility.

The Barrett Bay PSW is located approximately 750 m east of the Marysville Ferry Terminal.

The Browns Bay Wetland PSW is located approximately 70 m east of the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal.



- 9 -

3.3 Vegetation Communities

The study areas contains three (3) natural ELC communities (Open Aquatic [OA], Open Agriculture [OAG], and Treed Shoreline [SHT]) and three (3) anthropogenic communities (Commercial [CVC], Transportation and Utilities [CVI], and Residential [CVR]). Refer to Figures 2, 3, and 4 for the location of ELC vegetation communities. A photo record of the study areas is in Appendix C and the plant list can be found in Appendix D.

3.3.1 Open Agriculture (OAG)

The Open Agriculture areas identified were within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area and consisted of open pastures with planted grasses and forbs, as well as areas planted with annual row crops. The pastures adjacent to the ferry terminal appeared to be used for haying.

3.3.2 Open Aquatic (OA)

Open Aquatic areas are identified as communities with greater than 2 m depth of water.

The Kingston Ferry Terminal exists on the west shoreline of the Cataraqui River, approximately 800 m upriver from the outlet into the Upper St. Lawrence River. The area surrounding the Kingston Terminal is highly developed as it is part of the Kingston downtown waterfront, resulting in altered shorelines and degraded terrestrial and aquatic habitats. There is a large retaining wall surrounding the terminal that provides shoreline stability. There was no floating vegetation along the shoreline at this ferry terminal location.

The Marysville Ferry Terminal exists on the north shoreline of Wolfe Island in Marysville at Barrett Bay. The Marysville Terminal and areas adjacent consist of heavily developed residential and commercial waterfront properties with private docks, boathouses, floating rafts and anchored watercraft (sailboats, boats). The shoreline areas have significant anthropogenic alterations, including rock and concrete break walls and manicured lawns/gardens to the water’s edge. There was no floating vegetation along the shoreline at this ferry terminal location.

The Dawson Point Ferry Terminal is located on the north shoreline of Wolfe Island, approximately 2.5 km northeast of Marysville. The shoreline around the ferry terminal is highly altered, with large boulder (blast stone) and cobble in place around the shore of the parking area for erosion protection. The nearshore areas consisted primarily of rock material with some aquatic macrophyte growth.

3.3.3 Treed Shoreline (SHT)

Areas of Treed Shoreline consist of sites associated with and adjacent to permanent or ephemeral water subject to active shoreline processes with a tree cover greater than 25%. Both the Kingston Mainland and Dawson Point locations have areas of treed shoreline with overhanging willows and maples.

3.3.4 Rare Vegetation

The NHIC background data identified five historical records of rare plant species found within 10 km2 of the Kingston Mainland Ferry Terminal. The species are as follows; Brainerd’s Hawthorn (Crataegus brainerdii) S2 – very rare, Smith’s Bullrush (Schoenoplectus smithii) S3 – rare to



- 10 -

uncommon, Stiff Gentian (Gentianella quinquefolia) S2 – very rare, Bowman’s Root (Gillenia trifoliate) SX – apparently extirpated, and Branched Bur-reed (Sparganium androcladum) SH – historically known but not verified recently. As none of these species have been observed in the surrounding area for at least 35 years, it is assumed that they are unlikely to be present within or adjacent to the project area. None of these species were observed during the 2015/2016 field investigations.



- 11 -

Figure 2: ELC Communities – Kingston Ferry Terminal Study Area



- 12 -

Figure 3: ELC Communities – Marysville Ferry Terminal Study Areal



- 13 -

Figure 4: ELC Communities – Dawson Point Ferry Terminal Study Area



- 14 -

3.4 Wildlife Habitat

3.4.1 Birds

During the September 14, 2015 terrestrial field investigations, the following bird species were observed within all three study areas: American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), American Goldfinch (Cardeulis tristis), Caspian Tern (Sterna caspia), Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus), European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), Ring-billed Gull (Larus delawarensis), Rock Pigeon (Columba livia), and Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura). No other birds were observed during terrestrial field investigations. No nests of migratory or SAR birds were found within the three project areas during the 2015 field investigations.

During the Spring Fisheries Assessment conducted on May 16, 17, and 18 of 2016, a number of swallow species were observed flying above and adjacent to all three ferry terminal sites. The swallows observed include Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), Cliff Swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) and the provincially protected Barn Swallow. One (1) Barn Swallow pair was also observed nesting on one of the large bumper tires located on the northeast corner of the Kingston Mainland ferry dock. Please see Photos 7, 8, and 9 in the terrestrial photo log in Appendix C.

Of the species observed during the 2015 and 2016 field investigation, the following species are protected under the Migratory Bird Convention Act (MBCA) (1994): American Goldfinch, Caspian Tern, Cedar Waxwing, Cliff Swallow, Mallard, and Tree Swallow.

According to the Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas (OBBA) of 2001-2005, 110 species were recorded within a 10 x 10 km square (18UP89) encompassing the study area. Refer to Appendix E for the complete list of birds that have the potential to be found within the study area.

According to Bird Studies Canada, Wolfe Island (ON037) is identified as an Important Bird Area (IBA). Large number of several waterfowl species congregate around Wolfe Island during spring migration. Wolfe Island, together with Amherst Island, has gained international recognition for the concentration of wintering hawks and owls.

Refer to Section 5.5 for more information on SAR.

3.4.2 Herpetofauna

One daytime survey was completed on September 14, 2015, to confirm the presence or absence of herpetofauna. No herpetofauna were observed during field investigations.

According to the ORAA the following herpetofauna species may be found in the general area but were not observed during the 2015 terrestrial investigations: American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus), Blanding’s Turtle, Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus), Eastern Gartersnake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis), Eastern Musk Turtle, Gray Tree Frog (Hyla versicolor), Green Frog (Rana catesbeiana), Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum), Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens), Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica), Northern Watersnake (Nerodia sipedon), Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta marginata), and Snapping Turtle. Refer to Section 5.5 for more information on SAR.



- 15 -

3.4.3 Mammals

No mammals were observed during the 2015 field investigations.

The following species may be found in the general area: Muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus), Raccoons (Procyon lotor), Skunks (Mephitis mephitis), Northern River Otter (Lontra canadensis), American Mink (Neovison vison), Coyotes (Canis latrans), Short Tail and Long-tailed Weasel (Mustela erminea and M. frenata), Least Weasel (Mustela nivalis), and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes). Smaller species include Star-nosed Mole (Condylura cristata) and Hairy-Tailed Mole (Parascalops brewer).

According to the Atlas of Mammals (Federation of Ontario Naturalists, 1994), four (4) SAR bat habitat ranges cover the study areas. Refer to Section 5.5 for more information on SAR.

3.4.4 Insects

Incidental observations of insects within the study areas was included in the September 14, 2015 survey. No locally/regionally species or SAR were observed within the study areas.

According to the Ontario Butterfly Atlas (OBA), 22 species were recorded within a 10 x 10 km square (18UP89) encompassing the study area, including: Common Buckeye (Junonia coenia), Monarch (Danaus plexippus; provincially listed as Special Concern), Painted Lady (Vanessa cardui), and Viceroy (Limenitis archippus). Refer to Section 5.5 for more information on SAR.

3.5 Species at Risk

Species which are protected by the provincial Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) or the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) are discussed in this section. Secondary sources identified SAR habitat within the immediate or general surrounding area for the following species:

The MNRF – Peterborough District Office provided records of seven (7) SAR to be within or immediately surrounding the study areas, and includes: Barn Swallow, Banding’s Turtle, Bobolink, Chimney Swift, Eastern Meadowlark, Eastern Musk Turtle, and Snapping Turtle.

The Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas (2001-2005) confirmed the presence of 11 avifauna SAR within the general area (10x 10 km) and includes: Bank Swallow, Barn Swallow, Black Tern, Bobolink, Chimney Swift, Common Nighthawk, Eastern Meadowlark, Eastern Wood-pewee, Grasshopper Sparrow, Red-headed Woodpecker, and Wood Thrush.

The Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas confirmed the presence of four (4) SAR reptiles within the general area (10 x 10 km), and includes: Blanding’s Turtle, Eastern Musk Turtle, Northern Map Turtle, and Snapping Turtle.

The Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario (Federation of Ontario Naturalists, 1994) listed four (4) SAR bats with distribution encompassing the study areas, including: Little Brown Myotis, Eastern Small-footed Myotis, Tri-coloured Bat, and Northern Myotis.

The Ontario Butterfly Atlas provided records of Monarch within the general area (10 x 10 km) of the study area.



- 16 -

Table 2 provides a summary of the provincial and federal designations and protection status of the SAR as well as potential SAR habitat within the environmental study area. SAR listed as Special Concern are classified as Species of Conservation Concern and are also discussed in Section 4.7.3 Significant Wildlife Habitat: Species of Conservation Concern.

Targeted surveys were performed in search of SAR birds, SAR reptiles, SAR insects, and SAR plant species. During the 2015 field investigations no SAR were observed within the study areas. The presence of suitable habitat for all SAR was noted throughout the study area, and discussed in the table below.

During the 2016 Spring Fisheries Assessment, MH fisheries biologists observed one (1) provincially threatened SAR, Barn Swallow, flying overhead and adjacent to all three ferry terminals. No nests of this species were observed at the Marysville Ferry Terminal location but Barn Swallows were presumed to be nesting in nearby boathouses based on the number of birds flying into and out of these structures. At the Dawson Point terminal a pair of Barns Swallows were observed perching on the drop gate to the ferry and flying underneath (see Photo 21 in Appendix C). As the Dawson Point Terminal is not currently active it may be possible that the Barn Swallows may be nesting under the docking structure. Further investigations during the detail design are recommended to confirm the presence or absence of Barn Swallow nests under the Dawson Point structure. One (1) Barn Swallow nest was confirmed in one of the large bumper tires located on the northeast corner of the Kingston Ferry Terminal (see Photos 7, 8, and 9 in Appendix C). A pair was observed flying around this tire and was then witnessed flying into the tire. The MH fisheries staff inspected the tire to find one Barn Swallow nest adhered to the upper inside rim of the tire. As this area falls within the area proposed for improvement, appropriate mitigation measures will need to be developed during the detailed design phase to compensate for the removal and loss of this, and potentially other Barn Swallow nesting sites.

FINALa Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment


- 17 -

Table 2: Potential SAR in General Area and Likelihood of Presence in the Study Areas

Species Grouping

Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status* Provincial Status**

MNRF Habitat Protection

Habitat Requirements Information Source** Evidence of Presence Suitable Habitat

Within Study Area

Birds Bank Swallow Riparia riparia No Schedule; No Status

THR General Habitat Protection

Bank swallows nest in burrows in natural and human-made settings where there are vertical faces in silt and sand deposits. Many nests are on banks of rivers and lakes, but they are also found in active sand and gravel pits or former ones where the banks remain suitable. The birds breed in colonies ranging from several to a few thousand pairs.

OBBA in area 18UP89 No confirmed observations within the study areas

No suitable habitat within the study areas

Birds Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica No Schedule; No Status


Barn Swallows often live in close association with humans, building their cup-shaped mud nests almost exclusively on human-made structures such as open barns, under bridges and in culverts. The species is attracted to open structures that include ledges where they can build their nests, which are often re-used from year to year. They prefer unpainted, rough-cut wood, since the mud does not adhere as well to smooth surfaces.

OBBA in area 18UP89; MNRF Peterborough District Office identified potential presence at Marysville Ferry Terminal and Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study areas

Confirmed nesting in Kingston Ferry Terminal; Presumed nesting at Dawson Point Ferry Terminal and Marysville Ferry Terminal

Yes - Suitable habitat within the OA and CVR/CVI communities of the Kingston, Marysville and Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study areas

Birds Black Tern Chlidonias niger No Schedule; No Status

SC Black Terns build floating nests in loose colonies in shallow marshes, especially in cattails. In winter they migrate to the coast of northern South America.


No suitable habitat within the project area

Reptiles Blanding’s Turtle Emydoidea blandingii Schedule 1; END THR General Habitat Protection

Blanding's Turtles live in shallow water, usually in large wetlands and shallow lakes with lots of water plants. It is not unusual, though, to find them hundreds of metres from the nearest water body, especially while they are searching for a mate or traveling to a nesting site. Blanding's Turtles hibernate in the mud at the bottom of permanent water bodies from late October until the end of April.

ORAA in area 18UP89; MNRF Peterborough District Office identified potential presence at Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study areas

No confirmed observations within the study areas

Yes - Suitable habitat within the OA communities located within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area

Birds Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus No Schedule; No Status


Historically, Bobolinks lived in North American tallgrass prairie and other open meadows. With the clearing of native prairies, Bobolinks moved to living in hayfields. Bobolinks often build their small nests on the ground in dense grasses. Both parents usually tend to their young, sometimes with a third Bobolink helping.



Yes - Suitable habitat within the OAG communities located within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area

Birds Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Schedule 1; THR THR General Habitat Protection

Before European settlement Chimney Swifts mainly nested on cave walls and in hollow trees or tree cavities in old growth forests. Today, they are more likely to be found in and around urban settlements where they nest and roost (rest or sleep) in chimneys and other manmade structures. They also tend to stay close to water as this is where the flying insects they eat congregate.

OBBA in area 18UP89 ; MNRF Peterborough District Office identified potential presence at Marysville Ferry Terminal and Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study areas


Yes - Suitable habitat within the CVR communities located within the Marysville Ferry Terminal study area

Birds Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor Schedule 1; THR SC

Traditional Common Nighthawk habitat consists of open areas with little to no ground vegetation, such as logged or burned-over areas, forest clearings, rock barrens, peat bogs, lakeshores, and mine tailings. Although the species also nests in cultivated fields, orchards, urban parks, mine tailings and along gravel roads and railways, they tend to occupy natural sites.



Birds Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna No Schedule; No Status


Eastern Meadowlarks breed primarily in moderately tall grasslands, such as pastures and hayfields, but are also found in alfalfa fields, weedy borders of croplands, roadsides, orchards, airports, shrubby overgrown fields, or other open areas. Small trees, shrubs or fence posts are used as elevated song perches.




Reptiles Eastern Musk Turtle Sternotherus odoratus Schedule 1; THR SC

Eastern Musk Turtles are found in ponds, lakes, marshes and rivers that are generally slow-moving have abundant emergent vegetation and muddy bottoms that they burrow into for winter hibernation. Nesting habitat is variable, but it must be close to the water and exposed to direct sunlight. Nesting females dig shallow excavations in soil, decaying vegetation and rotting wood or lay eggs in muskrat lodges, on the open ground or in rock crevices.

ORAA in area 18UP89, ; MNRF Peterborough District Office identified potential presence at Kingston Ferry Terminal study area





- 18 -

Species Grouping




Within Study Area

Mammals Eastern Small-footed Myotis

Myotis leibii No Schedule; No Status

END General Habitat Protection

In the spring and summer, Eastern Small-footed Myotis will roost in a variety of habitats, including in or under rocks, in rock outcrops, in buildings, under bridges, or in caves, mines, or hollow trees. These bats often change their roosting locations every day. At night, they hunt for insects to eat, including beetles, mosquitos, moths, and flies.

In the winter, these bats hibernate, most often in caves and abandoned mines. They seem to choose colder and drier sites than similar bats and will return to the same spot each year.

Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario No confirmed observations within the study areas

No suitable maternity roosting habitat within the study areas

Birds Eastern Wood-pewee Contopus virens No Schedule; No Status

SC

The Eastern Wood-pewee lives in the mid-canopy layer of forest clearings and edges of deciduous and mixed forests. It is most abundant in intermediate-age mature forest stands with little understory vegetation.



Birds Grasshopper Sparrow

Ammodramus savannarum pratensis

No Schedule; No Status

SC

The Grasshopper Sparrow uses a variety of agricultural fields, such as planted cereals (e.g. rye) to cattle pastures for breeding and feeding.


Yes – Suitable habitat within the OAG located within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area

Birds Henslow’s Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Schedule 1; END END General Habitat Protection

The Henslow’s Sparrow breeds in the northeastern and east-central United States, and reaches its northeastern limit in Ontario. It has also been found in abandoned farm fields, pastures, and wet meadows. It tends to avoid fields that have been grazed or are crowded with trees and shrubs. It prefers extensive, dense, tall grasslands (>30 ha) where it can more easily conceal its small ground nest.

NHIC (Historic Record) in areas 18UP8494, 18UP8594, 18UP8696, and 18UP8198



Mammals Little Brown Myotis Myotis lucifugus Schedule 1; END END General Habitat Protection

Bats are nocturnal. During the day they roost in trees and buildings. They often select attics, abandoned buildings and barns for summer colonies where they can raise their young. Bats can squeeze through very tiny spaces (as small as six mm across); this is how they access many roosting areas. They hibernate from Oct/Nov to Mar/Apr, most often in caves or abandoned mines that are humid and remain above freezing.



Insects Monarch Danaus plexippus Schedule 1; SC SC

Throughout their life cycle, Monarchs use three different types of habitat. Only the caterpillars feed on milkweed plants and are confined to meadows and open areas where milkweed grows. Adult butterflies can be found in more diverse habitats where they feed on nectar from a variety of wildflowers. Monarchs spend the winter in Oyamel Fir forests found in central Mexico.

OBA in area 18UP89; No confirmed observations within the study areas

Yes – Suitable habitat within OAG communities within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area

Mammals Northern Myotis Myotis septentrionalis Schedule 1; END END General Habitat Protection

Northern long-eared bats are associated with boreal forests, choosing to roost under loose bark and in the cavities of trees. These bats hibernate from October or November to March or April, most often in caves or abandoned mines.



Reptiles Northern Map Turtle Graptemys geographica Schedule 1; SC SC

The Northern Map Turtle inhabits rivers and lakeshores where it basks on emergent rocks and fallen trees throughout the spring and summer. In winter, the turtles hibernate on the bottom of deep, slow-moving sections of river. They require high-quality water that supports the female’s mollusc prey. Their habitat must contain suitable basking sites, such as rocks and deadheads, with an unobstructed view from which a turtle can drop immediately into the water if startled.

ORAA in area 18UP89 No confirmed observations within the study areas


Birds Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Schedule1; THR SC

The Red-headed Woodpecker lives in open woodland and woodland edges, and is often found in parks, golf courses and cemeteries. These areas typically have many dead trees, which the bird uses for nesting and perching. This woodpecker regularly winters in the United States, moving to locations where it can find sufficient acorns and beechnuts to eat. A few of these birds will stay the winter in woodlands in southern Ontario if there are adequate supplies of nuts.





- 19 -

Species Grouping




Within Study Area

Reptiles Snapping Turtle Chelydra serpentina Schedule 1;SC SC

Snapping turtles spend most of their lives in water. They prefer shallow waters so they can hide under the soft mud and leaf litter, with only their noses exposed to the surface to breathe. During the nesting season, from early to mid-summer, females travel overland in search of a suitable nesting site, usually gravelly or sandy areas along streams. Snapping turtles often take advantage of man-made structures for nest sites, including roads (especially gravel shoulders), dams and aggregate pits.

ORAA in area 18UP89, NHIC area 18UP8594; MNRF Peterborough District Office identified potential presence at Dawson Point Ferry Terminal study area.


Yes - Suitable habitat within the OA communities at Dawson Point Ferry Terminal and Marysville Ferry Terminal study areas

Mammals Tri-coloured Bat Perimyotis subflavus Schedule 1; END END General Habitat Protection

Tri-coloured bat establishes maternity roosts within live and dead foliage within or below the canopy. Preference is given to Oak and sometimes Maples for roosting. This species has a very high site fidelity to particular leaf clusters within a season. Tri-coloured is an insect generalist and feeds along forests riparian corridors, over water and within forest canopy gaps. These bats hibernate from October or November to March or April, most often in caves or abandoned mines.



Birds Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina No Status SC

The wood thrush lives in mature deciduous and mixed (conifer-deciduous) forests. They seek moist stands of trees with well-developed undergrowth and tall trees for singing perches.

These birds prefer large forests, but will also use smaller stands of trees. They build their nests in living saplings, trees or shrubs, usually in sugar maple or American beech. The wood thrush flies south to Mexico and Central America for the winter.



*Species protected under the Species at Risk Act **Species protected under the Endangered Species Act, 2007



- 20 -

3.6 Designated Natural Areas

Designated Natural Areas are defined by resource agencies, municipalities, the government and/or public, through legislation, policies, or approved management plans, to have special or unique value. Such areas may have a variety of ecological, recreational, and/or aesthetic features and functions that are highly valued.

According to the City of Kingston Official Plan (2010), the shoreline along Lake Ontario and Great Cataraqui River/ Inner Harbour are designated as Environmental Protection Area. See Appendix B, City of Kingston Official Plan – Schedule 3A Land Use.

There are no Designated Natural Areas according to the Township of Frontenac Islands. Refer to Appendix B, Schedule ‘A’ – Land Use Plan, Township of Frontenac Islands.

According to Bird Studies Canada, Wolfe Island (ON037) is designated as an Important Bird Area (IBA).

3.7 Determination of Significance

Background research and field investigations were coupled with agency consultation in order to determine the habitat function and significance of wetlands, woodlands and other vegetated areas and wildlife habitats and movements. Figure 5 summarizes the terrestrial features, based on the information detailed below.

3.7.1 Wetlands

Significant wetlands are identified by the MNRF using evaluation procedures established by the province to determine the significance of the wetland. After being identified, wetlands must then be designated as such in municipal official plans.

The Greater Cataraqui Marsh PSW is situated approximately 1 km upriver from the Kingston Ferry Terminal facility. Refer to Figure 5. According to the City Kingston’s Official Plan (2010), the Open Aquatic (OA) area is designated as Riparian Corridors. See Appendix B Schedule ‘K’.

The Browns Bay Wetland PSW is located within the Dawson Point study area, approximately 70 m east of the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal. Refer to Figure 5.

The Barrett Bay PSW is located outside of the Marysville study area, approximately 750 m east of the Marysville Ferry Terminal. Refer to Figure 5.

3.7.2 Woodlands

A Significant Woodland is an area which is ecologically important in terms of features such as species composition, age of trees and stand history; functionally important due to its contribution to the broader landscape because of its location, size or due to the amount of forest cover in the planning area; or economically important due to site quality, species composition, or past management history. According to the City of Kingston Official Plan (2010), the Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan (2013), and LIO Data, there are no Significant Woodlands within the study area.



- 21 -

Figure 5: Terrestrial Map – Kingston Ferry Terminal, Marysville Ferry Terminal, and Dawson Point Ferry Terminal Study Areas



- 22 -

3.7.3 Wildlife Habitat

There are four categories of Significant Wildlife Habitat within Ecoregion 6E, according to the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide and Eco-Regional Criteria Schedule (MNRF, 2000 and MNRF, 2015):

Seasonal Concentration Areas;

Rare Vegetation Communities or Specialized Habitat for Wildlife;

Habitat for Species of Conservation Concern (Not including Endangered or Threatened Species); and

Animal Movement Corridors.

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Seasonal Concentration Areas

Some species of animals gather together from geographically wide areas at certain times of the year. This could be to hibernate or to bask (e.g., some reptiles and bats), over-winter (e.g. deer yards), or to breed (e.g., Bullfrog breeding and nursery areas, bird breeding colonies). Maintenance of the habitat features that result in these concentrations can be critical in sustaining local or even regional populations of wildlife.

According to Bird Studies Canada, Wolfe Island (ON037) is identified as an Important Bird Area (IBA). Large number of several waterfowl species congregate around Wolfe Island during spring migration. Wolfe Island, together with Amherst Island, has gained international recognition for the concentration of wintering hawks and owls.

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Rare Vegetation Communities and Specialized Habitat for Wildlife

Rare vegetation communities apply to the maintenance of biodiversity and rare plant communities (rather than individual rare species). Specialized habitat conditions can include old-growth forests, calving areas for moose, cliffs, and habitat for bird species associated with large blocks of habitat (generally greater than 25 ha), such as interior forest habitat (i.e. more than 100 m from an edge).

There are no identified Rare Vegetation Communities within the study area.

The OA communities within and adjacent to the three study areas may provide suitable Waterfowl Nesting Areas, Amphibian Breeding Areas, and Turtle Nesting Areas.

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Habitat for Species of Conservation Concern

Species which are protected by the ESA 2007 or SARA are discussed in detail in Section 5.5. Species of Conservation Concern include species that may be locally rare or in decline, but that have not yet reached the level of rarity that is normally associated with “Endangered” or “Threatened” designations under the ESA. Rare wildlife status is based on species listed as Special Concern under the ESA, Global Rank (G-rank) or Provincial Rank (S-rank) status, identified through the NHIC. The Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (MNRF, 2000) suggests that the highest priority for protection should be provided to habitats of the rarest species



- 23 -

(on a scale of global through to local municipality); it also states that habitats that support large populations of a species of concern should be considered significant.

Background information provided by the MNRF, NHIC, OBBA, OBA, and the ORAA listed the following special concern species as potentially occurring within or adjacent to the study areas; Black Tern, Common Nighthawk, Eastern Musk Turtle, Eastern Wood-pewee, Grasshopper Sparrow, Monarch, Northern Map Turtle, Red-headed Woodpecker, Snapping Turtle, and Wood Thrush. None of these species of special concern were observed during the MH field investigations.

Significant Wildlife Habitat: Animal Movement Corridors

According to the guidelines for Ecoregion 6E and to the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guidelines (2000), significance may potentially occur if the following example habitats are present (refer to the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guidelines for a comprehensive list):

Amphibian Movement Corridors: Movement corridors for amphibians moving from their terrestrial habitat to breeding habitat can be extremely important for local populations.

Deer Movement Corridors: Movement corridors for deer can be extremely important in allowing deer access to habitats that provide cover and food from harsh winter elements.

Bat Migration Corridor: Movement corridors for long distance migrant bats are extremely important as these species are susceptible to land use change and installation of obstacles that may affect movement patterns.

The OA communities may provide suitable Amphibian Movement Corridors.

4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

The following considerations were examined to improve the ferry and docking facilities at the three existing terminal locations:

Alterations to the marshalling area.

Larger docking/mooring facilities.

Improvements to pedestrian and cycling facilities.

Improvements to terminal facilities.

The recommended alternatives are shown on Figures 6, 7, and 8.

The following sections provide a summary of the impacts and general mitigation measures that are recommended to ensure protection of the natural environment.



- 24 -

Figure 6: Impact Areas – Kingston Ferry Terminal



- 25 -

Figure 7: Impact Areas – Marysville Ferry Terminal



- 26 -

Figure 8: Impact Areas – Dawson Point Ferry Terminal



- 27 -

4.1 Terrestrial Habitat, Vegetation and Designated Areas

Construction activities that may impact the terrestrial habitat include vegetation clearing, grading, excavation, and use of industrial equipment.

The proposed changes will result in the removal of 380 m2 or 0.038 hectares (ha) of Treed Shoreline (SHT) at Kingston Ferry Terminal (see Figure 6). There is potential to disturb vegetated areas and wildlife during construction by removing/damaging vegetation, noise during construction and loss of wildlife habitat, including breeding bird nests. The loss of vegetation is considered negligible as the impacted communities are isolated from larger, contiguous habitat. Moreover, the vegetation communities do not provide specialized terrestrial habitat and therefore the loss of this vegetation will not result in a significant loss of habitat.

The proposed changes to the Marysville Ferry Terminal will result in the removals of 2320 m2 or 0.232 ha of Residential (CVR) (see Figure 7). There is potential to disturb vegetated areas and wildlife during construction by removing/damaging vegetation, noise during construction and loss of wildlife habitat, including breeding bird nests. The loss of vegetation is considered negligible as the impacted communities are isolated from larger, contiguous habitat. Moreover, the vegetation communities do not provide specialized terrestrial habitat and therefore the loss of this vegetation will not result in a significant loss of habitat.

The proposed changes to the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal will result in the removals of 7870 m2 or 0.787 ha of Open Agriculture (OAG), 3560 m2 0.356 ha of SHT (see Figure 8). There is potential to disturb vegetated areas and wildlife during construction by removing/damaging vegetation, noise during construction and loss of wildlife habitat, including breeding bird nests. The loss of vegetation is considered negligible as the impacted communities are isolated from larger, contiguous habitat. Moreover, the vegetation communities do not provide specialized terrestrial habitat and therefore the loss of this vegetation will not result in a significant loss of habitat.

Recommended mitigation measures to protect terrestrial habitat and vegetation includes:

Adhere to NSP 001A860 to prevent wildlife harassment and/or harm to wildlife during construction;

Appropriate lengths of silt fencing along the perimeter of the shoreline should be erected prior to construction to limit impacts;

A construction work plan should designate specific locations for stockpiling of soils and other materials, equipment maintenance and/or fueling outside of adjacent natural areas and a minimum of 30m away from the shoreline;

Stormwater discharge during construction should be directed away from Lake Ontario;

All construction debris and litter will be removed frequently;

Minimize vegetation removal; cover should be re-established within 45 days of disturbance; and,

Existing vegetation not identified for removal should be protected by erecting and maintaining a temporary fence for tree protection, pruning interfering branches and treating them with approved dressing.



- 28 -

4.2 Designated Natural Areas

The Browns Bay Wetland is a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) and is located approximately 70 m east of the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal. Based on the preliminarily design layout (see Figure 8), there will be no encroachment into the PSW. However, due to the close proximity of the proposed facility and the nature of the project works, there is potential to temporarily impact surrounding fauna habitat through construction activities (i.e. noise disturbance).

By utilizing appropriate mitigation measures as identified in Section 4.1, impacts to the PSW should be minimal/negligible.

4.3 Migratory Birds

Of the species observed within the Kingston, Marysville, and Dawson Point Ferry Terminals, during the 2015 and 2016 field investigation, the following are protected under the Migratory Bird Convention Act, 1994 (MBCA 1994): American Goldfinch, Barn Swallow, Caspian Tern, Cedar Waxwing, Cliff Swallow, Mallard, and Tree Swallow. Barn Swallow is designated as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 and receives species and habitat protection under this Act. Impacts to Barn Swallow as well as appropriate mitigation measures are discussed in Section 4.4.2.

Mitigation measures to protection migratory bird species includes:

The Contractor will not destroy the active nests (nests with eggs or young birds), or wound or kill birds, of species protected under the MBCA 1994, and/or Regulations under that Act. When active nests are encountered, the Ministry’s Contract Administrator must be contacted (NSP 001A870);

Tree removal operations will be prohibited between April 1 and August 15 in any calendar year (NSP 001A870); and,

In the event that tree removal must occur within the above window, the Contractor must retain a Qualified Avian Biologist to conduct a nesting survey prior to clearing (NSP 001A870).

4.4 Species at Risk

The habitat of threatened and endangered species is protected under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA 2007). If avoidance and mitigation measures are implemented, a contravention under the ESA 2007 Section 9 (“No person shall, kill, harm, harass, capture or take a living member of a species that is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as an extirpated, endangered or threatened species”) and/or Section 10 (“No person shall damage or destroy the habitat of a species that is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario [SARO] list as an endangered or threatened species”) would not occur.



- 29 -

4.4.1 SAR Turtles

The Open Aquatic (OA) areas, particularly east of the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal near the Browns Bay Wetland PSW (see Figure 8), provides suitable habitat for Blanding’s Turtle and other turtles listed as special concern (e.g., Eastern Musk, Northern Map and Snapping Turtles). While no turtle nests were identified during site investigations, there is potential for SAR turtle nesting within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal.

Recommended general mitigation measures to protect SAR turtles may include:

Exclusionary fencing should be installed adjacent to the shoreline, prior to turtle nesting season (i.e., June) to prevent turtles from accessing the site for potential nesting sites, or as part of a travel corridor to find nearby suitable nesting sites;

All workers should be provided with awareness training (e.g. factsheets) that addresses the existence of SAR on site, identification of those species and proper actions when an individual is encountered;

Prior to commencing work, each work site shall be inspected for individual SAR and any individuals found shall be left to move on their own or moved properly out of harm’s way in the direction they were heading;

Advise workers to halt construction activities and inform the Construction Foreman or Construction Manager if any turtles (including nests) or other potential SAR are encountered;

Advise workers not to harm or harass any turtles or other wildlife;

Long-term exposed piles of dirt should be covered to prevent turtles from nesting in the work area;

If a nesting turtle is found the MNRF shall be notified immediately and a five (5) metre buffer zone shall be flagged around the site and that area protected from harm during the nesting season, or otherwise managed with MNRF’s approval; and

All SAR sightings and encounters should be reported to the MNRF Peterborough Office within two (2) business days.

4.4.2 Barn Swallow Mitigation

One (1) Barn Swallow nest was confirmed in one of the large bumper tires located on the northeast corner of the Kingston Mainland Ferry Terminal during the 2016 field investigation. An additional survey at this ferry terminal will need to be conducted prior to construction to verify presence of nesting. If this nest is still present, the proposed facility design will involve the removal of the Barn Swallow nest. Activities that may harm Barn Swallows or damage or destroy its habitat, may be exempt from Clause 9(1)(a) and 10(1) of the ESA 2007 provided conditions in the ESA are met.

Under provincial laws (ESA 2007 and Ontario Regulation 242/08), prior to the start of work, the project may require registration with the MNRF and follow the Notice of Activity – Alter a Structure (Habitat for Barn Swallow) rules.

Under the MNRF’s Notice of Activity – Alter a Structure (Habitat for Barn Swallows), MTO is required to:



- 30 -

Avoid anything that could harm the bird(s) if they are using the structure;

Take steps to prevent the bird(s) from building nests or entering the structure during their active season (April 1 to August 31) (e.g., install tarp or netting);

Replace any nests that are removed, damaged or destroyed with a nest cup;

Install nest cups on the existing structure, different suitable structure (within 1 km) or a new structured created or modified to be suitable for Barn Swallow nesting (within 1 km); and

Build or modify a structure within 1 km of the affected habitat and within 200 m of an area that is accessible and suitable for foraging.

If the ferry terminal is no longer suitable for Barn Swallow, MTO must:

Build or modify a structure within 1 km of the affected habitat and within 200 m of an area that is accessible and suitable for foraging;

Provide more habitat than what was removed; and

Provide suitable nesting conditions.

The works on the Barn Swallow habitat must be completed before the next active season begins (if work started outside the active season) or before the active season begins (if work will be done during the active season).

MTO must monitor the habitat for 3 years after it is created during the active season to determine Barn Swallow use.

During the 2016 investigation, Barn Swallows were also observed foraging at the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal. An additional Barn Swallow survey should be undertaken to determine the presence and location of Barn Swallow nests at this location. If nests are observed, registration under the MNRF may also be required.

4.4.3 SAR Grassland Birds – Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark

The Open Agriculture (OAG) community, located within the Dawson Point proposed area of impact (see Figure 8), provides suitable habitat for two (2) species of grassland birds protected under the ESA 2007: Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark. Surveys following approved MNRF protocol should be conducted in order to confirm the presence of these SAR grassland bird species.

Should Bobolink and/or Eastern Meadowlark be observed, registration, including a Habitat Management Plan, may be required.

4.5 Sediment and Erosion Control

Recommended mitigation measures to minimize sedimentation and erosion should be conducted in accordance with OPSS 805 and include:

Conscientious design, installation and maintenance of sediment and erosion controls including but not limited to silt fence, straw bales, turbidity curtains, rock check dams, and erosion control blankets;



- 31 -

Timely re-vegetation (maximum 45 days) of exposed soils, both for temporary work areas and final grades (existing vegetation on embankments shall be maintained as long as possible and new slopes shall be stabilized as soon as possible by seeding and mulching);

Minimized vegetation removal;

The contractor will be required to select suitable construction access routes and fueling areas away from any waterbodies to avoid watercourse and groundwater contamination and siltation; and

A 200m stand-by supply of prefabricated light duty silt fence barrier, in addition to silt fence barrier which may be specified elsewhere in the Contract, shall be maintained at the Contract site prior to commencement of grading operations and throughout the duration of the Contract.

The contractor will be reminded of the requirement to report contaminant spills (including the discharge of sediment into waterways) as per the Environmental Protection Act and the Fisheries Act and to store any toxic chemicals or contaminants in a safe location away from any waterbodies.

5. PERMITS AND APPROVALS

Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997

Fur-bearing mammals, game animals, and specially protected animals are protected under the provincial Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997. Under this act, it is prohibited to kill, harass, or capture these species or destroy, take or possess their nest or eggs. The project is not anticipated to impact these restrictions and no permit is required.

Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994

The removal or destruction of any nest of a migratory bird protected under the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 is prohibited. Vegetation removals should be assessed for nesting habitat prior to removal and, in the instance that a nest is encountered; consultations with Environment Canada and/or MNRF should be undertaken to determine a reasonable management practice.

Endangered Species Act, 2007

Endangered and threatened species are protected under the provincial Endangered Species Act, 2007, which specifically prohibits willful harm to endangered and threatened species that are listed in regulations under the Act and the willful destruction of, or interference with their habitats. Due to the presence of one (1) Barn Swallow nest at the Kingston Ferry Terminal, the project will require a Notice of Activity – Alter a Structure (Barn Swallow Habitat) registration. Should additional nests be discovered at any of the terminal locations following a Barn Swallow survey, registration will also be required for those sites.

Additionally, if Bobolink and/or Eastern Meadowlark are identified during recommended grassland bird surveys in the OAG community adjacent to the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal, registration and Habitat Management Plans will be required. Providing avoidance and mitigation measures are followed, no other approvals under the ESA 2007 are anticipated.



- 32 -

6. CONCLUSIONS

Potential impacts which could affect terrestrial ecosystems as a result of the ferry and docking improvements were assessed. The proposed changes will result in minor vegetation removal to the areas immediately surrounding the Kingston, Marysville, and Dawson Point Ferry Terminals.

Based on the results of the 2016 field investigation, damage and destruction to Barn Swallow habitat is likely to occur as a result of the Kingston Ferry Terminal improvements, and registration under the ESA 2007 is anticipated. Additional investigations during detail design are recommended to confirm the presence of Barn Swallow at all three terminals and for Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark within the Dawson Point Ferry Terminal. Should nests/breeding habitat be confirmed, registration under the ESA 2007 will be required.

Should mitigation measures outlined within this report be adhered to, the works associated with these aspects of the project are not likely to result in major impacts to wildlife or vegetation communities. Habitat function and value within the work area, and in adjoining habitats, will remain as status quo following construction as long as proper environmental protection and are implemented, continually monitored, and used effectively during construction.



- 33 -

7. REFERENCES

Alan Macnaughton, Ross Layberry, Colin Jones and Bev Edwards. Ontario Butterfly Atlas Online. http://www.ontarioinsects.org/atlas_online.htm; Accessed (August 30, 2017).

Bird Studies Canada. 2017. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas of Canada: https://www.ibacanada.org/

Cadman, M.D., D.A. Sutherland, G.G. Beck, D. Lepage, and A.R. Couturier (Editors). 2007. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario, 2001-2005. Bird Studies Canada, Environment Canada, Ontario Field Ornithologists, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ontario Nature, Toronto. 706 pp.

Crins, William J., Paul A. Gray, Peter W.C Uhlig, and Monique C. Wester. 2009. The Ecosystems of Ontario, Part I: Ecozones and Ecoregions. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough Ontario, Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment, SIS TER IMA TR-01, 71pp.

Dobbyn, J.S. 1994. Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario. Federation of Ontario Naturalists, Don Mills, Ontario.

Environment Canada. 2014. Species at Risk Act Public Registry. http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm

Federation of Ontario Naturalists. 1994. Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario.

Hoffman, D.W., Wicklund, R.E., Richards, N.R. (Editors). 1959. Soil Survey of Frontenac County, Report No.39 – Soil Map South, of the Ontario Soil Survey. Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture. Ontario Agriculture College. Guelph.

Oldham, M.J. 1999. Natural Heritage Resources of Ontario: Rare Vascular Plants. Third Edition. Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. 53 pages.

Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas. 2004. www.birdsontario.org/atlas/atlasmain.html.

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 1998. Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario: First Approximation and Its Application. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2015. Significant Wildlife Habitat EcoRegion Criteria Schedule 6E. https://www.ontario.ca/document/significant-wildlife-habitat-ecoregional-criteria-schedules-ecoregion-6e

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2017. Species at Risk in Ontario List, Species Profiles. http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/species-risk-ontario-list

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. 2014. Make a Natural Heritage Map https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/make-natural-heritage-area-map.

http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm

http://www.birdsontario.org/atlas/index.jsp



- 34 -

Ontario Ministry of Transportation. 2013. Environmental Reference for Highway Design.

Ontario Nature. 2015. Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas: a citizen science project to map the distribution of Ontario’s reptiles and amphibians. Ontario Nature, Ontario. Available: http://www.ontarionature.org/atlas; Accessed (August 30, 2017)

DRAFT Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design and Class Environment Assessment


APPENDIX A

Correspondence with Regulatory Agencies

1

From: Warren, Catherine (MNRF) <[email protected]>

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:51 PM

To: Thomas Howson

Subject: MNRF File No: 15-KING-KNG-EAE-2059 Permit Application and Data Request for

Fisheries, Terrestrial and Species at Risk Information for three terminal locations of the

Wolfe Island Ferry located at Kingston (1) and Wolfe Island (2)

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Hello Thomas,

MNRF Peterborough District has received your email regarding the request for terrestrial species at risk and fisheries

information for the project areas:

1) Barrack St. Ferry Terminal – St. Lawrence River, Kingston

2) Marysville Ferry Terminal – St. Lawrence River, Wolfe Island 3)

Dawson Point Ferry Terminal – St. Lawrence River, Wolfe Island

We provide the following general information for your consideration:

2

Fisheries

Waterbody

Name and

Location

(GPS

coordinates &

Google Earth

map)

Watercourse

classification

(ie.

Warmwater,

coldwater)

Habitat

information/locations

(fish passage barriers,

known spawning

habitats etc.)

Historical data on fish species

present, including whether the

subject waterbody(s) are considered

to support any vulnerable,

threatened or endangered aquatic

species

MNR fisheries

management

objectives, if

applicable

MNR

interpretation

of fish and

fish habitat

sensitivity

(scale of high,

moderate, low

or unknown

as per DFO’s

Risk

Management

Framework)

In-water

timing

windows for

construction

St. Lawrence

River – Barrack

St. Terminal

(Kingston)

warmwater No information on file. Lake Ontario Fish Species

Sources: Centre of Water and The

Environment, MNR, Queen’s University

and St. Lawrence College (2002-2007)

Emerald Shiner, Brook Silverside,

Stonecat, Common Shiner, Spottail Shiner,

Central Mudminnow, Northern Redbelly

Dace, Finescale Dace, Creek Chub,

Silvery Minnow, Bluntnose Minnow,

Fathead Minnow and Central Stoneroller

Please refer to the following website for the

Lake Ontario Annual Reports for additional

fish species information which includes the

St.Lawrence River.

http://www.glfc.org/lakecom/loc/mgmt_unit/

Please refer to the

following link for

Lake Ontario

management

objectives.

http://www.glfc.org

/lakecom/loc/mgm

t_unit/

LOW No in-water work

between March

15th-July 15th.

Terrestrial SAR Eastern Musk Turtle (SC)

St. Lawrence

River –

Marysville

Terminal (Wolfe

Island)





Please refer to the

following link for

Lake Ontario

management

objectives.


between March

15th-July 15th.





3










St.Lawrence River.


http://www.glfc.org

/lakecom/loc/mgm

t_unit/

Terrestrial SAR Bobolink (THR), Eastern Meadowlark

(THR), Barn Swallow (THR),

Chimney Swift (THR)

St. Lawrence

River – Dawson

Point (Wolfe

Island)














St.Lawrence River.


Please refer to the

following link for

Lake Ontario

management

objectives.

http://www.glfc.org

/lakecom/loc/mgm

t_unit/


between March

15th-July 15th.

Terrestrial SAR Browns Bay PSW adjacent

to dock location

Snapping Turtle (SC) Bobolink (THR),

Eastern Meadowlark (THR), Barn Swallow

(THR), Chimney Swift (THR), Blanding’s

Turtle (THR)









4

*Please see the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Projects Near Water website: http://www.dfo-

mpo.gc.ca/pnwppe/index-eng.html to ensure your obligations under the Fisheries Act are met and contact your local

Conservation Authority for any approvals that may be required and/or recommendations on any sediment/erosion control

measures that may be required to be installed prior/during/after construction.

Species at Risk

Species listed as endangered or threatened on the Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) list are protected under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). Section 9(1) of the ESA prohibits a person from killing, harming, harassing, capturing or taking a member of a species listed as endangered, threatened or extirpated on the SARO list. Section 10(1) of the ESA prohibits the damage or destruction of habitat of a species listed as endangered or threatened on the SARO list.

Since comprehensive mapping for most Species at Risk is not available a site assessment is recommended, to identify

the presence of any Species at Risk and/or their habitat on the subject lands, as a decision should not be made in the

absence of such information. The focus of the site assessment can include a review of the information about known

occurrences provided by MNRF above along with other information sources such as species distributions and habitat

requirements as well as field visits using MNRF approved protocols during the appropriate seasons by a qualified

professional. Due to the species that are potentially present at this site, the following recommendations should help

prevent adverse impacts:

Birds

Workers must be vigilant and check work areas for the presence of breeding birds and nests containing eggs and/or

young. If breeding birds and/or nests are encountered, works should not continue in the location of the nest until after

August 1 (or as soon as it has been determined that that the young have left the nest). Please note that the breeding bird

season in the subject area extends from April 15 to July 31st. Therefore, works should commence after July 31 whenever

possible.

Specific Barn Swallow Information:

Barn Swallow nests may be present under bridges and/or culverts. Therefore, the underside of these structures should be

assessed for Barn Swallow nests before proceeding. If there are no nests present (or if nests are present, but not being

used at the time of construction), a contravention of the ESA is unlikely. However, if nests are present and being utilized,

construction should not begin until after August 15 of any year. Understanding that some projects need to occur before or

during nesting season, the bridge should be blocked prior to nesting season (April 15 – August 15) using netting or tarping

in order to prevent Barn Swallows from nesting under the bridge (if there is evidence of past nesting activity).

Turtles and Snakes

Workers must be vigilant and check work areas for the presence of turtles. If turtles or snakes are encountered, whenever

possible, work should be temporarily suspended until the animal is out of harm’s way. Workers should report any turtle

observations (including photographs and coordinates) to the Peterborough District Office immediately at (705) 755-2001.

Please note that the turtle nesting season in the subject area extends from May 15 to Aug 15. Therefore, activities which

may cause adverse impacts to a species or habitat (e.g. use of heavy equipment) should commence after Aug 15.

As of July 1, 2013, there are new regulatory provisions provided under the ESA. This regulatory provision allows eligible

activities, such as work undertaken to repair, modify, demolish, replace or general maintenance of a structure or the

removal of buildings and/or excavation of land, vegetation removal, etc. that is considered to be species at risk habitat to

proceed without a permit, provided the proponent register with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and then

follow the specific rules in regulation under the ESA. These rules include, but are not limited to, preparing a mitigation plan

and implementing steps to minimize the adverse effects of the activity on the species identified.

Information on the new ESA regulatory provision that come into effect on July 1, 2013 can be found at

http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/natural-resources-approvals.

The amended ESA regulation (O.Reg 242/08) can be found at http://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/080242.

If an impact to a Species at Risk or its habitat cannot be avoided, a person(s) should contact MNRF to discuss options,

including applying for an authorization under the ESA. In situations where an activity is not registered with or authorized

5

by the MNRF, a person(s) must comply with the ESA by modifying proposed activities to avoid impacts to Species at Risk

and habitat protected under the ESA.

It is highly recommended that landowners and on-site workers familiarize themselves with information found at the

following links:

MNRF Species at Risk website: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk

During on-site activities, should any species at risk or their habitat be potentially impacted, MNRF should be contacted

immediately and operations should be modified to avoid any negative impacts to species at risk or their habitat until

further discussions with MNRF can occur regarding opportunities for mitigation. If any species at risk are found, the

Peterborough District MNRF office should be contacted at 705-755-2001. If possible, pictures of the species at risk and

coordinates for the location where it was observed should be provided to MNRF.

Scientific Collector’s Permit

My colleague Julie is working on your Scientific Collector’s Permit to collect fish right now. She will forward it to you soon.

If you have any questions regarding the above comments, don’t hesitate to contact me. Please reference the file number

15-KING-KNG-EAE-2059 for any future correspondence.

Sincerely,

Catherine Warren

Catherine Warren A/District Planner Peterborough District Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 300 Water Street, 1st Floor South Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5 Tel: (705) 755-3294 Fax: (705) 755-3125 Email: [email protected]

DRAFT Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment


APPENDIX B

Official Plans

Schedule ‘A’ - Land Use PlanTownship of Frontenac Islands

LEGEND

Agriculture

Rural

Provincially Significant Wetland

Village

Waste Disposal Assessment Area

Major Roads

Ferry Alternatives

Local Roads

Aggregate and Mineral Resources

Sensitive Shoreline

Tunnock Consulting Ltd

Revised October 7, 2011

Hazard Land

Note: Proposed Bridge Location

Special Policy5.3.4 e)

Special Policy 5.4.6

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

29 27 25 23 21

17 15 13

11

9 7 5 3 119

Lot 1

3

5

7

9

IIII IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI

XI XII XIII XIV

XV

XVI XVII XVIII

XIX XX XXI

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Lot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Lot 27

BELLSPOINT

YOTTSPOINT

LONG POINT

BEARPOINT

HORNESPOINT

POINTALEXANDRIA

POINTHINCKLEY

BAY

BUTTON

BAYFIELDISLAND

CARPENTERPOINT

BAYFIELD BAY

MACANDIEPOINT

MCGREGORBAY

IRVINEPOINT

WOODMANBAY

LEWISBAY

MURRAYBAY

BANFORDPOINT

POINTBEAUVAIS

PORTMETCALF

ARABELLAISLAND

QUEBECHEAD

BAYBRAKEY

RATTRAY

DIGHAMPOINT

POINT

IRVINE BAY

POINTHOLLIDAY

POINTOAK

BAYMcDONELL

POINTBROPHY

KNAPPPOINT

ABRAHAMHEAD

BROWNSBAY

DAWSONPOINT

BARRETT BAY

MARYSVILLE

FERGUSONPOINT

MILLPOINT

LUCASPOINT

POINTSTALEY

FOUR MILEPOINT

POINTNINE MILE

REEDS BAY

BIGSANDY

BAY

ONTARIO

LAKE

ST. LAWRENCE RIVER

0 500 1000 2000 METRES

N

CAPE VINCENT

ST. LAWRENCE RIVER

ST. LAWRENCE RIVER

BAYHOLLIDAY

Bateau Channel

Johnson Bay

Bateau Channel

GARDENISLAND

WinterRouteST. LAWRENCE RIVER

Sum

mer

Route

ISLANDGOOSE

BAYSAND

BATEAU CHANNEL

HORSESHOEISLAND

ONTARIO

LAKE

Special Policy 5.1.4

Amend by redesignating all of Lots 22,

23 and 24 from Agriculture to Rural

Change from Agriculture to Rural

Amend by

redesignating

Hazard Land to Rural

Amend Village Boundary

Amend to add Local Roads

Amend to: potential bridgelocations



APPENDIX C

Terrestrial Photographic Record

Photo 1. Cataraqui River/Upper St. Lawrence River – Kingston Terminal – City of Kingston – View

from the Wolfe Island Ferry terminal, facing north. September 14, 2015


from the Wolfe Island Ferry terminal, facing west. September 14, 2015


from the Wolfe Island Ferry terminal, facing north. September 14, 2015


from the Wolfe Island Ferry terminal, facing east. September 14, 2015


showing the old docks on the north side of the adjacent pier, south of the ferry terminal facility. September 14, 2015


showing the old docks on the northwest side of the adjacent pier, southwest of the ferry terminal facility. September 14, 2015

Photo 7. Cataraqui River/Upper St. Lawrence River – Kingston Terminal – City of Kingston – Barn

Swallow observed perching on the north side of the Kingston Terminal. May 17, 2016

Photo 8. Cataraqui River/Upper St. Lawrence River – Kingston Terminal – City of Kingston – Large

tire adhered to the north side of the Kingston Terminal where a Barn Swallow was observed flying in and out of. May 17, 2016

Photo 9. Cataraqui River/Upper St. Lawrence River – Kingston Terminal – City of Kingston – Barn

Swallow nest observed in a tire adhered to the north side of the Kingston Terminal. May 17, 2016

Photo 10. Upper St. Lawrence River – Marysville Terminal – Township of Frontenac Islands – View of

the ferry terminal docking facility, facing west. September 14, 2015


the ferry terminal docking facility, facing west. September 14, 2015


the developed shoreline from the ferry terminal docking facility, facing south. September 14, 2015


the developed shoreline from the ferry terminal docking facility, facing north. September 14, 2015

Photo 14. Upper St. Lawrence River – Dawson Point Terminal – Township of Frontenac Islands – View

from the Dawson Point ferry terminal, facing north. September 14, 2015


from the Dawson Point ferry terminal, facing east. September 14, 2015


from the Dawson Point ferry terminal, facing south. September 14, 2015


of the natural shoreline west of the ferry terminal, composed primarily of bedrock substrate with a forested riparian buffer. September 14, 2015


of the natural shoreline east of the ferry terminal (border of Brown’s Bay Wetland), composed primarily of bedrock substrate with a forested riparian buffer. September 14, 2015


of the adjacent agricultural fields east of the Dawson Point ferry terminal, facing north. September 14, 2015


of the adjacent agricultural fields east of the Dawson Point ferry terminal, facing south. September 14, 2015

Photo 21. Upper St. Lawrence River – Dawson Point Terminal – Township of Frontenac Islands – Barn

Swallow observed perching on Dawson point ferry terminal. May 17, 2016

Photo 22. Upper St. Lawrence River – Dawson Point Terminal – Township of Frontenac Islands – Barn

Swallows observed flying around the Dawson point ferry terminal. May 17, 2016



APPENDIX D

Vegetation Communities Plant List

WOLFE ISLAND FERRY & DOCKING IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY DESIGN EA STUDY PLANT LIST

Type Scientific Name Common Names Coefficient Conservation

Coefficient Wetness

SRank

Tree Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 0 -2 S5

Tree Acer platanoides Norway Maple 0 5 SE5

Tree Acer rubrum Red Maple 4 0 S5

Tree Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 5 -3 S5

Tree Aesculus hippocastanum Horse Chestnut 0 5 SE2

Herb Amaranthus sp Pigweed Species

Herb Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common Ragweed 0 3 S5

Herb Aralia nudicaulis Wild Sarsaparilla 4 3 S5

Herb Arctium minus ssp. minus Common Burdock 0 5 SE5

Herb Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed 0 5 S5

Tree Betula papyrifera White Birch 2 2 S5

Herb Bidens sp Beggar-ticks Species

Graminoid Bromus inermis ssp. inermis Smooth Brome 0 5 SE5

Shrub Carpinus caroliniana Blue Beech 6 0 S5

Tree Carya cordiformis Bitternut Hickory 6 0 S5

Tree Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory 6 3 S5

Herb Chenopodium album var. album

Lamb's Quarters 0 1 SE5

Herb Cichorium intybus Chicory 0 5 SE5

Herb Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis

Canada Enchanter's Nightshade

3 3 S5

Herb Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle 0 3 SE5

Herb Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle 0 4 SE5

Shrub Cornus foemina ssp. racemosa

Grey Dogwood 2 -2 S5

Shrub Cornus stolonifera Red-osier Dogwood 2 -3 S5

Shrub Crataegus sp Hawthorn Species

Graminoid Dactylis glomerata Orchard Grass 0 3 SE5

Herb Daucus carota Wild Carrot 0 5 SE5

Herb Fragaria virginiana ssp. virginiana

Common Strawberry

2 1 S5

Tree Fraxinus americana White Ash 4 3 S5

Tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 3 -3 S5

Herb Galium sp Bedstraw Species

Herb Geum sp Avens Species

Herb Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not

4 -3 S5

Tree Juglans nigra Black Walnut 5 3 S4

Shrub Juniperus communis Common Juniper 4 3 S5



Coefficient Wetness

SRank

Herb Lactuca biennis Tall Blue Lettuce 6 0 S5

Herb Linaria vulgaris Butter-and-eggs 0 5 SE5

Shrub Lonicera sp Honeysuckle Species

Lotus corniculatus Bird's-foot Trefoil 0 1

Herb Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife 0 -5 SE5

Herb Maianthemum stellatum Starry False Solomon's Seal

6 1 S5

Shrub Malus pumila Common Apple 0 5 SE5

Herb Melilotus alba White Sweet-clover 0 3 SE5

Tree Morus rubra Red Mulberry 10 1 S2

Shrub Myrica gale Sweet Gale 6 -5 S5

Herb Oenothera biennis Common Evening-primrose

0 3 S5

Tree Ostrya virginiana Hop Hornbeam 4 4 S5

Graminoid Panicum virgatum Switch Grass 6 -1 S4

Woody Vine

Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 6 1 S4?

Graminoid Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0 -4 S5

Tree Picea glauca White Spruce 6 3 S5

Tree Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 0 5 SE5

Herb Plantago major Common Plantain 0 -1 SE5

Herb Polygonum persicaria Lady's Thumb 0 -3 SE5

Tree Populus alba European White Poplar

0 5 SE5

Tree Populus balsamifera ssp. balsamifera

Balsam Poplar 4 -3 S5

Tree Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides

Eastern Cottonwood

4 -1 S5

Tree Populus grandidentata Largetooth Aspen 5 3 S5

Tree Populus nigra Lombardy Poplar 0 5 SE4

Tree Populus tremuloides Trembling Aspen 2 0 S5

Herb Potentilla argentea Silvery Cinquefoil 0 3 SE5

Herb Prenanthes altissima Tall White Lettuce 5 3 S5

Shrub Prunus virginiana ssp. virginiana

Choke Cherry 2 1 S5

Tree Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 5 1 S5

Tree Quercus rubra Red Oak 6 3 S5

Shrub Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn

0 3 SE5



Coefficient Wetness

SRank

Shrub Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac 1 5 S5

Shrub Ribes sp Currant Species

Tree Robinia pseudo-acacia Black Locust 0 4 SE5

Shrub Rubus sp Rubus Species

Tree Salix fragilis Crack Willow 0 -1 SE5

Shrub Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry

5 -2 S5

Graminoid Setaria viridis Green Foxtail 0 5 SE5

Herb Sinapis arvensis Wild Mustard 0 5 SE5

Woody Vine

Solanum dulcamara Bittersweet Nightshade

0 0 SE5

Herb Solidago altissima var. altissima

Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5

Herb Solidago canadensis var. canadensis

Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5

Herb Solidago patula Rough-leaved Goldenrod

8 -5 S5

Herb Sonchus arvensis ssp. arvensis

Field Sow-thistle 0 1 SE5

Herb Symphyotrichum cordifolium

Heart-leaved Aster 5 5 S5

Herb Symphyotrichum laeve var. laeve

Smooth Aster 7 5 S5

Herb Symphyotrichum novae-angliae

New England Aster 2 -3 S5

Herb Symphyotrichum sp Aster Species

Shrub Syringa vulgaris Common Lilac 0 5 SE5

Herb Taraxacum officinale Common Dandelion

0 3 SE5

Tree Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar

4 -3 S5

Tree Tilia americana Basswood 4 3 S5

Herb Trifolium hybridum ssp. elegans

Alsike Clover 0 1 SE5

Herb Trifolium pratense Red Clover 0 2 SE5

Tree Ulmus americana White Elm 3 -2 S5

Herb Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis Slender Stinging Nettle

2 -1 S5

Herb Verbascum thapsus Common Mullein 0 5 SE5

Shrub Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 4 -1 S5

Vine Vicia cracca Cow Vetch 0 5 SE5



Coefficient Wetness

SRank

Herb Viola sp Violet Species

Woody Vine

Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0 -2 S5

**SRank or Subnational /Provincial Rank Definitions:

SX — Presumed Extirpated Species or community is believed to be extirpated from the province or state. Not located despite intensive searches of historical sites and other appropriate habitat, and virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered.

SH — Possibly Extirpated (Historical) Species or community occurred historically in the province or state, and there is some possibility that it may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20–40 years. A species or community could become SH without such a 20-40 year delay if the only known occurrences in a province or state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The SH rank is reserved for species or communities for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences.

S1 — Critically Imperiled Critically imperiled in the province or state because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences) or because of some factor(s) such as very steep declines making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the province or state.

S2 — Imperiled Imperiled in the province or state because of rarity due to very restricted range, very few populations (often 20 or fewer), steep declines, or other factors making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the province or state.

S3 — Vulnerable Vulnerable in the province or state due to a restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation.

S4 — Apparently Secure Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.

S5 — Secure Common, widespread, and abundant in the state or province.

SNR — Unranked Province or state conservation status not yet assessed.

SU — Unrankable Currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to substantially conflicting information about status or trends.


SNA — Not Applicable A conservation status rank is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities.

S#S# — Range Rank A numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate any range of uncertainty about the status of the species or community. Ranges cannot skip more than one rank (e.g., SU is used rather than S1S4).

DRAFT Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design and Class Environment Assessment


APPENDIX E

Breeding Bird Atlas Data

Wolfe Island Ferry & Docking Improvements Preliminary Design EA Study Breeding Bird List

Endangered

Threatened

Special Concern

Square Species Breeding Evidence

18UP89 Canada Goose

Confirmed

18UP89 Wood Duck Confirmed

18UP89 Mallard Confirmed

18UP89 Blue-winged Teal

Possible

18UP89 Common Merganser

Confirmed

18UP89 Wild Turkey Possible

18UP89 Common Loon

Possible

18UP89 Pied-billed Grebe

Possible

18UP89 Double-crested Cormorant

Confirmed

18UP89 American Bittern

Possible

18UP89 Great Blue Heron

Possible

18UP89 Green Heron Probable

18UP89 Turkey Vulture

Possible

18UP89 Osprey Confirmed

18UP89 Northern Harrier

Probable

18UP89 Sharp-shinned Hawk

Possible

18UP89 Cooper's Hawk

Possible

18UP89 Red-tailed Hawk

Confirmed

18UP89 American Kestrel

Confirmed

18UP89 Virginia Rail Possible

18UP89 American Coot

Possible

18UP89 Killdeer Confirmed

18UP89 Rock Pigeon Confirmed

18UP89 Spotted Sandpiper

Confirmed

18UP89 Upland Sandpiper

Confirmed

18UP89 Common Snipe

Probable

18UP89 American Woodcock

Possible

18UP89 Ring-billed Gull

Probable

18UP89 Herring Gull Possible

18UP89 Black Tern Probable

18UP89 Mourning Dove

Confirmed

18UP89 Black/Yellow-billed Cuckoo

Possible

18UP89 Black-billed Cuckoo

Probable

18UP89 Eastern Screech-Owl

Confirmed

18UP89 Great Horned Owl

Confirmed

18UP89 Common Nighthawk

Probable

18UP89 Chimney Swift

Confirmed

18UP89 Ruby-throated Hummingbird

Confirmed

18UP89 Belted Kingfisher

Probable

18UP89 Red-headed Woodpecker

Possible

18UP89 Red-bellied Woodpecker

Probable

18UP89 Downy Woodpecker

Confirmed

18UP89 Hairy Woodpecker

Confirmed

18UP89 Northern Flicker

Confirmed

18UP89 Pileated Woodpecker

Confirmed

18UP89 Eastern Wood-Pewee

Probable

18UP89 Alder Flycatcher

Possible

18UP89 Willow Flycatcher

Probable

18UP89 Least Flycatcher

Possible

18UP89 Eastern Phoebe

Confirmed

18UP89 Great Crested Flycatcher

Confirmed

18UP89 Eastern Kingbird

Confirmed

18UP89 Yellow-throated Vireo

Possible

18UP89 Warbling Vireo

Probable

18UP89 Red-eyed Vireo

Confirmed

18UP89 Blue Jay Confirmed

18UP89 American Crow

Confirmed

18UP89 Horned Lark Confirmed

18UP89 Purple Martin

Confirmed

18UP89 Tree Swallow Confirmed

18UP89 Northern Rough-winged Swallow

Confirmed

18UP89 Bank Swallow Possible

18UP89 Cliff Swallow Confirmed

18UP89 Barn Swallow Confirmed

18UP89 Black-capped Chickadee

Confirmed

18UP89 White-breasted Nuthatch

Confirmed

18UP89 Carolina Wren

Confirmed

18UP89 House Wren Confirmed

18UP89 Winter Wren Probable

18UP89 Marsh Wren Confirmed

18UP89 Eastern Bluebird

Possible

18UP89 Veery Probable

18UP89 Wood Thrush Confirmed

18UP89 American Robin

Confirmed

18UP89 Gray Catbird Probable

18UP89 Brown Thrasher

Probable

18UP89 European Starling

Confirmed

18UP89 Cedar Waxwing

Probable

18UP89 Yellow Warbler

Confirmed

18UP89 Chestnut-sided Warbler

Probable

18UP89 Magnolia Warbler

Probable

18UP89 Black-throated Blue Warbler

Possible

18UP89 Yellow-rumped Warbler

Possible

18UP89 Black-throated Green Warbler

Probable

18UP89 Blackburnian Warbler

Possible

18UP89 Pine Warbler Confirmed

18UP89 American Redstart

Possible

18UP89 Ovenbird Probable

18UP89 Common Yellowthroat

Confirmed

18UP89 Eastern Towhee

Probable

18UP89 Chipping Sparrow

Confirmed

18UP89 Field Sparrow Possible

18UP89 Vesper Sparrow

Possible

18UP89 Savannah Sparrow

Probable

18UP89 Grasshopper Sparrow

Possible

18UP89 Song Sparrow Confirmed

18UP89 Swamp Sparrow

Probable

18UP89 Scarlet Tanager

Possible

18UP89 Northern Cardinal

Confirmed

18UP89 Rose-breasted Grosbeak

Probable

18UP89 Indigo Bunting

Possible

18UP89 Bobolink Confirmed

18UP89 Red-winged Blackbird

Confirmed

18UP89 Eastern Meadowlark

Confirmed

18UP89 Common Grackle

Confirmed

18UP89 Brown-headed Cowbird

Confirmed

18UP89 Baltimore Oriole

Confirmed

18UP89 House Finch Confirmed

18UP89 American Goldfinch

Probable

18UP89 House Sparrow

Confirmed

Documents

Appendix 1: Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report › documents › Volume 3_Appendices › Ap… · FINAL Terrestrial Ecosystems Impact Assessment Report Preliminary Design