82
TRIGGERING OF SURFACE DISCHARGE SWITCHES by RANDY DALE CURRY, B.S.E.E. A THESIS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Accepted August, 1985

Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

TRIGGERING OF SURFACE

DISCHARGE SWITCHES

by

RANDY DALE CURRY, B.S.E.E.

A THESIS

IN

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in

Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

the Degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

IN

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Appr~

Accepted

August, 1985

Page 2: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to express my gratitude for the guidance

and support given by Dr. Kristiansen and Dr. Hatfield

throughout the program and further to thank Dr. Guenther

and Dr. Agarwal for their advice and technical support

during the course of this study. I am also indebted to

George Voightlin at LLNL for the computer simulations of

the equipotential plots. Likewise, the support of the

graduate students in the Plasma and Switching Laboratories

was most appreciated. I am especially indebted to Mark

Fowler, Chris Young, Noreen, and my parents, without whose

patience and insistence this program might not have been

completed. I would also like to thank Gary Leiker and

Ellis Loree for their help and advice.

ii

Page 3: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • i i

ABSTRACT • • • . . . . . . . • • • . . . . . . . . • iv

LIST OF TABLES • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

LIST OF FIGURES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . vi

I. INTRODUCTION •••••.•••••••• • • 1

6

6

II.

III.

IV.

v.

VI.

VII.

OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM . . . . . . . Circuit Operation and Design . . . System Parameters • • • • • • • • • • • 9

Trigger Generators . . . . . . • • • • 14

DIAGNOSTICS . . . . . . . . . . . • • • 15

Voltage and Current Measurements ••• 16

Photographic Techniques • • • • • • • • 18

Surface Analysis . . . . . . . . • 21

TRIGGERING • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 22

RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • 3 5

Polarity and Dielectric Effects . . • • 35

Surface Charging

Surface Analysis

. . . . . . . . • • • 50

. . . . . . . . . . • 57

GAS EFFECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • 6 0

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • 6 5

LIST OF REFERENCES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • 6 7

APPENDIX • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . • • • • • . . • 70

iii

Page 4: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

ABSTRACT

The performance of a triggered, 45 kV, 3 kA surface

discharge switch was investigated under different operat­

ing conditions. The performance of the switch was explor­

ed, using G-10, Delrin and Lucite (polymer) discharge

substrates. Under optimum operating conditions, the

discharge characteristics of the switch using air, nitro­

gen, SF6 , helium, argon, and various mixtures were eval­

uated. The trigger performance was evaluated through

measurements of jitter, the number of channels per shot,

and the effects of charging voltage and trigger electrode

polarity. Similarly, surface charging and the character­

istics of the dielectrics were studied using ESCA, SEM and

optical microscopy.

iv

Page 5: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE

1. Switching Characteristics of G-10 as a Function of Trigger and Charging Voltage Polarities •.•.....•.

2. Switching Characteristics of Delrin as a Function of Trigger and Charging

37

Voltage Polarities • . . . • . • . . . . . . • . 43

3 •

4.

5.

Switching Characteristics of Lucite as a Function of Trigger and Charging Voltage Polarities •.•.•..

Comparison of Surface Resistances Before and After Exposure to Flashover

. . . . . .

List of Gases Employed in the Switching Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . .

v

48

59

61

Page 6: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE

1.

2.

3.

4 .

5.

6.

7 .

8 .

9.

Block Diagram of the Surface Discharge Switch System and Diagnostics ...•.

Outline Drawing of the Surface Discharge Switch ....

Photographs of Single Channel and Multichannel Electrodes .

. . . . . . . . . .

Schematic of the Experimental Arrangement .

Photograph of the Surface Discharge Switch

Equivalent Circuit of the 6 ohm Load and a Schematic of the Trigger Generator

Schematic and Photograph of the Voltage Dividers and Feedthroughs .

Streak Camera Arrangement . . . . .

View of the Slit for Multichannel and Single Channel Development Measurements

10. Trial Locations of the Trigger Electrode

11. Jason Computer Code Plot of Equipotentials With and Without a Grounded Trigger Electrode Inserted . . . . . . . . . .

12. Jason Computer Code Plot of the Equipotentials With a 50 kV Trigger Pulse Applied to the Trigger Electrode and One

4

7

8

10

12

13

17

19

20

25

28

Resulting E-field Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

13. Streak Photographs Showing Simultaneity of Multichannel Closure Near the Cathode and Single Channel Arc Development at the Surface . . . . . . . . . . . 31

vi

Page 7: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

14.

15.

16.

17.

Open Shutter Photograph of Multichannels and Framing Photograph of Predischarge Luminosity ..•••••••.•.

Voltage and Current Characteristics of G-10 for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and Positive 50 kV Trigger Voltage .•.

Overlay of 5 Shots Showing the Effect of Conditioning on the Risetime ...

Time Integrated Photographs of Multichannels of G-10 ..•••

18. Voltage and Current Characteristics of Delrin for a Positive 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger Pulse

19. Multichanneling Characteristics of Delrin for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a

33

38

39

40

44

Positive 50 kV Trigger Pulse . . . . • • • . 45

20. Voltage and Current Characteristics of Delrin for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Pulse ....

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

Voltage and Current Characteristics of Lucite for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger

Charge Decay Curves of Lucite, G-10, and Delrin • • . • . • . . .

Dust Pattern of a G-10 Dielectric Showing the Charge Pattern Left on the Surface by 500 Shots (Multichannel) •......

Dust Patterns Showing Surface Charges Left by Single Channel Discharges Comparing High Rep-Rate and Low Rep-Rate Operation

Photograph of G-10 Exposed to 6 Shots in 80% N2 + 20% SF6 •..•.•. · · ·

Photograph of G-10 Exposed to 6 Shots in 80% SF

6 + 20% N2 • . . . . . . . •.

Photograph of Discharge in 5% air + 95% He Mixture, Negative 5 kV Charge Voltage, 50 kV Trigger ..•....

vii

47

49

53

55

56

62

63

64

Page 8: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

28.

29.

30.

31.

Dimensions of the 6 n load •• . . . . . . . . . Dimensions of the gas chamber .••••••••

Top view of the SDS with dimensions •••••.

Dimensions of the SDS (Side View) . . . . . . .

viii

71

72

73

74

Page 9: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

High current, high voltage switches are used in many

pulsed power applications, such as lightning, EMP and

pulsed radiation simulation. Railgaps are frequently used

as the primary switch; however, these types of switches

suffer from inherent design limitations. Typically, a

transmission line provides the low inductance path to the

load, with a railgap incorporated into the transmission

line. The electrodes of the railgap are usually located

off the surface of the transmission line, thus adding

inductance and impedance mismatch to the line. The

inductance of the system increases proportionally to the

area added by the raised electrodes and inversely to the

number of channels which carry the current. The added

. d 1. . t th . di d 1. bl t th 1 d 1n uctance 1m1 s e max1mum dt e 1vera e o e oa .

Since a surface discharge switch (SDS) actually uses the

dielectric of the transmission line as the switching

surface, the surface discharge switch geometry does not

present any appreciable inductance to the system, if it

has a sufficient number of simultaneous discharge channels

sharing the current.

1

Page 10: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

2

Historically, surface discharges have been used as

light sources, laser preionizers, and plasma cathodes [1,

2,3,4]. Only recently have these surface discharges been

widely employed as fast, high current switches [5]. When

used as the main switch, the SDS is usually pulse charged

and triggered before breakdown occurs [6]. The pulse

charging rapidly overvol tages the switch, thus enhancing

dense multichanneling and providing the low jitter

necessary for many high current, low inductance switching

applications.

To date,

available on

D.C. charged

very little detailed information has been

D.C. charged surface discharge switches.

switches have been limited in application

because they did not afford desirable switching properties

(low jitter, low prefire). On the other hand, for repeti­

tive operation, a high current, high voltage switch must

recover its voltage holdoff quickly, withstand the

reapplied charge voltage without pre firing, trigger

reliably on a repetitive basis, and maintain reproducible

voltage and current characteristics throughout the life of

the switch. The voltage holdoff characteristics of the

insulator in the surface discharge switch should remain

constant after the multichannel flashover of the switch,

which can alter the insulator behavior. During the

discharge, thermal shock, UV irradiation, high temperature

gradients, chemical degradation of the surface, carboni­

zation, surface erosion and metal vapor deposition onto

Page 11: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

3

the surface of the insulator can contribute to undesirable

insulator modifications. Therefore, a study was under-

taken to examine the operating characteristics of a D.C.

charged, triggered SDS under varying conditions.

The operating characteristics and the basic inter­

action of the arc with different dielectrics were studied.

A 45 kV, 3 kA switch was built on a 1 m long, 6 ohm trans­

mission line, thus allowing evaluation of the switch per­

formance (Figure 1) . Under all possible trigger and

charge voltage combinations three radically different

dielectrics (G-10, Delrin, Lucite) were tested. G-10, an

epoxy laminate, is unlike Delrin, which is a polyacetal,

and Lucite, which is a polymethyl methacrylate. The best

voltage combination (negative charging voltage, positive

trigger) and the best dielectric (G-10) were tested in

various gases, including helium, nitrogen, argon, SF6 , and

air, as well as various mixtures of each. All tests were

conducted at 1 atm STP. The operation of the switch was

diagnosed by voltage, current and jitter measurements

under the aforementioned optimum voltage and current

arrangement in air. Streak photography was used to

examine the arc development at the dielectric interface

and to examine the simultaneity of closure times of the

multichannel arcs.

Finally, degradation of the surface of the dielec­

tric was examined using ESCA (electron spectroscopy for

Page 12: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

c ::pp

.~,.

~

POW

ER

SU

PP

LY

6 .n

~

TRIG

GE

RE

D

1 1

TRA

NS

MIS

SIO

N

SUR

FAC

E LI

NE

D

ISC

HA

RG

E

6ll

LOA

D

PULS

ER

25

kV-

80

kV

RE

VE

RS

IBLE

PO

LAR

ITY

FA

ST

RIS

ETI

ME

(I

OkV

/ns)

PU

LSE

R

50kV

FIX

ED

O

UTP

UT

SW

ITC

H

(!) z 2:

TRIG

GE

R

i=

LOW

V

OLT

AG

E

TIM

ING

AN

D

CO

UN

TIN

G C

IRC

UIT

S

(I)

0 ._ (I)

0 z ~

0

DIA

GN

OS

TIC

S

VO

LTA

GE

M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NTS

C

UR

RE

NT

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

TS

STA

TIC

SU

RFA

CE

CH

AR

GE

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

TS

TIM

E

INTE

GR

ATE

D P

HO

TOG

RAP

HY

SUR

FAC

E A

NA

LYS

IS

( S

EM

,ES

CA

,SU

RF

AC

E R

ES

ISTA

NC

E)

ST

RE

AK

P

HO

TOG

RA

PH

Y

Fig

ure

1

. B

lock

D

iag

ram

of

the

Su

rface

Dis

ch

arg

e

Sw

itch

S

yst

em

an

d D

iag

no

sti

cs.

,j::>

.

Page 13: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

5

chemical analysis), SEM (scanning electron microscopy),

surface charge measurements and surface resistance

measurements. The results of the aforementioned program

are reported in the following sections.

Page 14: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER II

OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM

Circuit Operation and Design

As previously mentioned, a 45 kV surface discharge

switch was constructed using a 1 m long, 20.3 em wide

stripline (Figure 2) (see the Appendix for dimensions).

This was actually a modified version of a SDS used in the

overvoltaged mode [7]. Both the single channel /and fi-

multichannel electrodes (Figure 3) were easily adjustable

to various spacings and were constructed of brass. A blue

nylon dielectric, 0.63 em thick and 30.5 em wide, provided

the insulation between the charged portion of the strip-

line and the ground return side. ,A slot, 33 em long and

0.16 em deep, was milled into the blue nylon line. A G-10

insert, placed in the slot, isolates the main trigger

electrode from the switch electrodes. This main trigger

electrode consisted of a 2.54 em wide strip of 2 mil thick

copper tape which was placed between the G-10 insert and

the blue nylon (Figure 2) line. During the main course of /.

the study, one edge of the main trigger electrode was

located 3 em from the charged electrode, and the other

edge 0. 66 em from the other electrode. The electrode

spacing was set at 6.2 em to give self-break voltages

6

Page 15: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CH

ARG

ED

SID

E

BA

KE

LITE

..,.

a

CLA

MP

S B

LUE

N

YLO

N

DIE

LEC

TRIC

S

AM

PLE

LUC

ITE

CH

AM

BE

R

MA

IN

ELE

CTR

OD

ES

GR

OU

ND

RE

TUR

N

G-1

0 IN

SE

RT

Fig

ure

2

. O

utl

ine

Dra

win

g o

f th

e

Su

rface

Dis

ch

arg

e

Sw

itch

. '-

.)

Page 16: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Single channel electrodes.

B. Multichannel electrodes.

Figure 3. Photographs of Single Channel and Multichannel Electrodes.

8

Page 17: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

9

between 45 and 55 kV (dependent on the trigger and charg­

ing polarities) [8]. For the 6.2 em electrode separation,

an insulator sample with dimensions 0.16 em x 30.5 em x

12 em was held in place by the electrodes. In addition to

the main trigger, an auxiliary electrode was placed on the

surface of the sample, at its edge. The auxiliary elect-

rode provided additional field distortion and UV preil-

lumination. The auxiliary electrode was a 0.63 em wide,

2.5 em long strip of 2 mil copper tape. This auxiliary

electrode was placed 5.2 em from the edge of the sample

and 2. 54 em from the grounded electrode. In this posi-

tion, an arc occurs between the auxiliary trigger elect-

rode and the main electrodes.

{-;(>j

/c<V ~

Jel . ..-J)"f System Parameters

The energy was stored in four parallel, 25 ohm cables

which are attached to the 6 ohm transmission line (Figure

4) • The four cables are D.C. charged through a 2 Mn

resistor. When discharged, the 20 m long lines provided a

200 ns wide pulse into a matched 6 ohm load. The dis-

tributed capacitance of the four cables is .0174 ~F,

producing a 13.9 Joule discharge, when charged to 40

kilovolts. When a trigger pulse was applied to the main

trigger electrode, the switch broke down, discharging the

stored energy into the 6 ohm load. The load consisted of

six each, 1 ohm ceramic disk resistors placed in series

(see the Appendix for dimensions). The SDS, the load

'

Page 18: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

FO

UR

-25n

TR

AN

SMIS

SIO

N L

INES

2M

n-

POW

ER S

l.PPL

.Y

_0-1

00 k

V

--(7

/ /1

(. ~"<

..(__

..::

:,

lA

,',

j

CU

RR

ENT

/MO

NIT

OR

EL

ECTR

OD

ES

].)r.l

ckt.j<

-:;

?v /¥

~,

\ I

~____,

~. "

~

AU

XIL

IAR

Y.,/

".

TRIG

GER

2M

n

10000~~

40

00

pF

f/

30

kV

CO

NTR

OL

CIR

CU

ITS

CABL

E P

ll..S

ER

I

I

25

-IO

OkV

~

Gn

L~D

CAPA

CITI

VE

PRO

BES

6 M

ETER

S 50

0HM

CAB

LE

( RG

-19

)

Fig

ure

4

. S

ch

em

ati

c o

f th

e

Ex

peri

men

tal

Arr

an

gem

en

t.

1--'

0

Page 19: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

11

and the connection of the four transmission lines to the

main transmission line are shown in Figure 5. The load was

designed for rep-rate operation and was capable of handling

4 kW of average power. The equivalent circuit of the load

is shown in Figure 6A. The time varying inductance and the

time varying resistance are shown in order to emphasize the

importance of the dimensions in pulsed power loads. The

effects of these were checked by considering the diffusion

width of the current into the load. The skin depth factor

(1/e penetration depth) is given by:

-a 0- -w~a

( 1 )

where w is 2n times the frequency, ~ is the permeability of

free space (4n x 10-7 H/m) and a is the conductivity of the

resistors. For the risetime of the system, the frequency

used in the calculation was approximated as f = 10 MHz and

the conductivity of the ceramic-carbon matrix as a =

.692 mhos/meter. This give a o = .19 m. Since the diameter

of the resistors is .11 m, which is smaller than o, L(t) and

R(t) are approximately constant. The capacitance CL across

the load results from the connecting plate and is approxi-

mately 200 pF. The inductance LL of the load was calculated

to be 200 nH. The inductance was measured at 1000 Hz and

found to be 220 nH.

Page 20: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

Fig

ure

5

. P

ho

tog

rap

h o

f th

e

Su

rface

Dis

ch

arg

e

Sw

itch

.

1--'

"->

Page 21: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

13

L(t) ~ 0 R(t) ~ 0

-----~

LL = 220 nH

CL = 200 pF

A. Equivalent circuit of the 6 Q load.

20 Mil 6 METERS

50n CABLE

o-4o kV REVER SIB

POLARITY

RG-19

3 CAPACITORS 2nF 40 kV

~--~~~HH~---~on

B. Schematic of the trigger generator.

Figure 6. Equivalent Circuit of the 6 ohm Load and a Schematic of the Trigger Generator.

PULSER 50kV

Page 22: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

14

Trigger Generator

A fast cable pulser was constructed to produce the

fast dV/dt (10 kV/ns) pulse necessary for the multichannel

operation of the switch. The design of the pulser also

allowed the polarity and amplitude of the trigger pulse to

be varied for easy testing of the switch under different

conditions. The schematic of the pulser is shown in

Figure 6B. The 20 M~ charging resistor and the four 50

M ~ bias

flashover.

resistors were immersed in oil to prevent

Likewise, to meet the fast dV/dt requirements

of the spark gap, a commercially available, triggered gap

(Pulsar, model T-670) was mounted to minimize the induct­

ance in the return current path. A 6 m long, 50 ohm

(RG-19) cable was charged to approximately 36 kV and then

discharged to ground to obtain the 10 kV/ns pulse risetime

needed to trigger the surface discharge switch. The spark

gap, a mid-plane, field distortion, triggered gap, is

triggered with a 50 kV pulse from a low energy pulser

(Atlantic-Pacific, model PT-55).

Page 23: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER III

DIAGNOSTICS

Diagnostics, one of the most important aspects in the

design of an experiment, play a key role in understanding

and evaluating the physics and performance of an experi­

ment. An interactive diagnostic program of on-line and

off-line diagnostics proved invaluable in the studies

(Figure 1). On-line (time resolved, active) diagnostics,

used during the operation of the experiment, measured

voltage and current risetimes, waveshapes, and the jitter

of the switch. Time integrated photography, along with

streak and framing photography, allowed streamer (channel

formation positions) and simultaneity of the closure times

to be assessed. Off-line (passive) diagnostics used under

static conditions (after exposure of the dielectric to a

selected number of shots) , evaluated the charging

characteristics of the dielectrics, surface degradation

(chemical and vapor deposition), and surface resistance

after exposure to flashover. Surface charge measurements

consisted of two types; first, a static measurement where

the insulator was dusted with an electrostatic powder

which attached to only positive charges; and second, a

15

Page 24: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

16

field meter which measured the residual surface charge

decay over several hours. Surface chemical analysis

techniques, such as ESCA and SEM, analyzed the surface for

carbonization and chemical vapor deposits. Surface

resistance measurements were made with a deposited

metallic pattern. A voltage was applied to the deposited

pattern on the sample. The current was then measured and

the surface resistance calculated.

Voltage and Current Measurements

Voltage probes typically have resistive, capacitive,

or a combination of both resistive and capacitive

elements. Capacitive voltage probes, built into the

transmission line, were used to determine val tage rise­

times and amplitudes on the trigger and across the load.

The capacitive probes consisted of thin brass sheets ( 1

mil thick) separated from the ground return by 3 mil thick

Mylar. The BNC feedthroughs incorporated into the line

isolated the output of the probes from the ground return

and allowed fast resistive dividers to be mounted under

the return side. The resistive feedthroughs (voltage

divider) (Figure 7) prevent the lower capacitor c2 from

discharging too fast and provide additional attenuation.

The voltage dividers were constructed using 2 Watt,

noninductive, carbon resistors and 3/4" copper tube

housings. The resistive dividers had a 2 ns (10% - 90%)

Page 25: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

HIGH VOLTAGE ---T---

I I I I

_L c,

A. Schematic of the voltage probes.

B. Photograph of the SDS and the resistive feedthroughs (below the surface).

Figure 7. Schematic and Photograph of the Voltage Dividers and Feedthroughs.

17

Page 26: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

18

risetime and the overall divider network had a 5 ns (10%-

90%) risetime (fastest in-situ calibration pulse avail­

able). The capacitive probe monitoring the trigger pulse

was used to determine jitter. The output of the voltage

probe monitoring the trigger strip was used to trigger the

external input of an oscilloscope, allowing multiple

traces of the load voltage riset imes to be compared.

The current was monitored with a PEARSON coil mounted on

one of the 25 ohm transmission line return lines.

Photographic Techniques

Time integrated (open shutter) photography and streak

photography were used to study the spread of arc closure

times, arc development along the surface and the average

number of channels per shot. The framing and streak

measurements used a TRW lD camera with additional optics

(imaging lenses, mirrors, etc.). In the streak mode, a

slit selects a portion of the gap and views this area for

a selected period of time (Figure 8). The position of

these slits are shown on Figure 9. Framing photographs

taken from above for a 200 ns intervals show that luminous

predischarge currents were present. The result of the

measurements are discussed in more detail in subsequent

chapters.

Page 27: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

IMAGING MIRROR LENS

#T-- --0----~-- ---: I : I SLIT

SURFACE DISCHARGE SWITCH

STREAK CAMERA

A. Top view for determining the multichannel closure times.

IMAGING LENS

~~---0-----~------SURFACE SLIT

DISCHARGE SWITCH

STREAK CAMERA

B. Side view for determining the arc development at the surface of the dielectric.

Figure 8. Streak Camera Arrangement.

19

Page 28: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CATHODE

CATHODE

I II 1 1 I

I'\­L.JI

I ---'---

STREAK OF MULTICHANNELS

SURFACE DISCHARGE SWITCH

TIME

A. Top View

SLIT

B. Side View

(SINGLE CHANNEL ELECTRODE)

ANODE STREAK OF ARC

SURFACE DISCHARGE SWITCH

TIME

SURFACE

Figure 9. View of Slit for Multichannel and Single Channel Development Measurements.

20

Page 29: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

21

Surface Analysis

Surface charge measurements, SEM, ESCA, and surface

resistance measurements were made to evaluate the inter­

action of the arc and the insulator surface [ 8,10,11].

The samples were first cleaned with cyclohexane and then

inserted into the switch. After a predetermined number of

conditioning

the trigger

shots, the surface charge decay times over

and the uniformity of charge across the

surface were examined with a commercial fieldmeter (Monroe,

Model 171). The decay measurements were made over several

hours time (up to 24 hours) by means of a chart recorder.

During the measurements, the samples were left in the

switch and the field probe placed over them. Before the

measurements, the main electrodes were removed. Because

the probe lacked good spatial resolution, another means of

checking the charge patterns left on the insulator was

developed. An electrostatic powder (Xerox, yellow toner

powder #6500) was dusted onto the surface of the insulator

and the pat tern photographed. The sharp detai 1 and the

distinct contrast of the pattern revealed the distinctive

difference in the way the insulators retain charge. For

example, on G-10, the field meter detected a fairly

uniform charge distribution. Upon dusting with the

powder, a striated pattern was revealed. Unlike the other

two dielectrics (Lucite and Delrin), the striations were

quite dense and distinct.

Page 30: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER IV

TRIGGERING

Triggering of SDS's is complicated by both the

(dielectric) as well as its geometry. S\vitch substrate

Various methods of triggering have been employed by other

investigators, including field distortion, and photo­

induced triggering [12, 13, 14]. Field distortion, the

most popular method, is complicated primarily by

geometrical considerations and by surface charging of the

dielectric used as the switching substrate. The most

widely reported type of field distortion triggering

employs an electrode which is placed on the surface of the

sample, and biased at an equipotential level [ 14] • The

surface trigger electrode has several inherent drawbacks

which include erosion and the necessity for careful

alignment, as well as additional vapor deposition onto the

dielectric. The other reported form of field distortion

uses a trigger electrode located below the surface of the

sample, which is

switching surface

isolated from the main electrodes and

[ 15] . Several methods of triggering

were explored during the course of study. The results of

the study are reported herein.

22

Page 31: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

23

Laser triggering was tried with single channel

(shaped) electrodes, placed 4 em apart in one atmosphere

of ambient air. A one megawatt pulse from a nitrogen

laser was focused onto the surface of the switch from

above. Even at 90% of selfbreak voltage, no triggering

was achieved. When the laser beam was focused onto the

electrodes (either cathode or anode), visible sparks off

the electrode surfaces also failed to trigger the switch.

These results may indicate that higher energy levels would

be needed for successful laser triggering or that laser

triggering is not practical for surface discharge

switches. It is also likely that the length of the laser

pulse was too short (20 ns). Longer laser pulses, which

are on the order of the discharge growth time, are prob­

ably needed to trigger surface discharges. Likewise, a

selected laser wave length corresponding to a resonant

frequency of the dielectric and the surrounding gas medium

may be required to trigger a switch of this type success­

fully.

Two types of field distortion triggering were also

investigated. The first method employed various geome­

tries of trigger electrodes placed on the surface of the

switch. Included among the electrode shapes were rods and

metal strips placed at various positions (mid plane, 2/3

point, etc., and biased) on the surface. Although the

multichannel electrodes (Figure 3B) were employed,

Page 32: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

24

multichannel ing did not occur for any of the electrode

trigger polarity combinations. The final and most

successful trigger scheme also utilized field distortion.

In this case, the main trigger is isolated from the

discharge and the main electrode by the G-10 insert, as

previously described (Figure 2).

Jitter, as well as channel formation, is dependent on

the risetime of the trigger pulse, the energy coupled into

the discharge by the trigger and the polarity of the

trigger. These factors are dramatically affected by the

switching medium below which the trigger is located, the

positioning of the trigger, and the width of the trigger

strip. Various locations for the isolated trigger were

tried (Figure 10).

Three dielectrics were tried during the tests (G-10,

Delrin, Lucite). The optimum dielectric (in terms of

multichanneling performance and jitter) along with the

optimum polarity of charging voltage and trigger pulse

polarity (G-10, negative charging, and positive trigger

voltages) were utilized to determine the optimum trigger

location. With the optimum conditions fixed, the trigger

width and positions were varied. As the unbiased trigger

strip (2.54 em width) was moved toward the charged elec­

trode, the hold-off voltage of the gap decreased quite

rapidly. Likewise, the multichanneling of the switch

Page 33: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

~

T ~

A.

Tri

gg

er

ele

ctr

od

e,

.64

em

w

ide

was

lo

cate

d at

the

mid

po

int.

~ .~

C.

Tri

gg

er

ele

ctr

od

e,

2.5

4

em

wid

e

was

lo

cate

d

3 em

fr

om

th

e

ch

arg

ed

ele

ctr

od

e

(mo

st

su

ccessfu

l).

~

-,-

.--.

a

B.

Tri

gg

er

ele

ctr

od

e,

2.5

4

em

wid

e

was

lo

cate

d at

the

mid

po

int .

~

.,......

. D

. T

rig

ger

ele

ctr

od

e,

2.5

4

em

wid

e

was

lo

cate

d

un

der

the

gro

un

ded

ele

ctr

od

e.

Fig

ure

1

0.

Tri

al

Lo

cati

on

s o

f th

e T

rig

ger

Ele

ctr

od

e.

1\.

)

Ul.

Page 34: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

26

decreased and triggering became erratic (Figure lOB). At

the midpoint, the width of the strip was narrowed to

0.63 em. The multichanneling of the switch also decreased

and triggering became unreliable (Figure lOA). The width

of the trigger strip was once again increased to 2.54 em

and the strip placed 3 em from the charged electrode in

the 6.2 em gap (Figure lOC). This seemed to be the most

optimum position in terms of jitter, triggering and

multichanneling. One other position was tried. The 2.54

em wide strip was moved under the uncharged electrode

(Figure lOD). In this case, triggering was not success­

ful. During the tests, the selfbreak voltage varied with

the trigger electrode position. At the best position, the

selfbreak voltage was approximately 55 kV. With the

charge voltage held at -40 kV, the best position of the

trigger seemed to be 3 em from the charged electrode

(Figure lOC). At this position and charging voltage

level, the best results in terms of multichanneling and

jitter were obtained. The jitter (5 shots) in this posi­

tion was 5 ns and the average number of channels was 8-9

per shot (with an auxiliary trigger added) when employing

G-10. The material used as the switching substrate, as

well as the voltage polarities, had dramatic effects on

the voltage and current characteristics of the switch.

These results, along with the surface charging character­

istics, are reported in later chapters. The charging of

Page 35: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

27

the dielectric has been hypothesized to be the principal

mechanism which contributes to the dense multichanneling.

However, no theory has been developed to account for the

dramatic differences seen in materials which have the same

charge polarity, but have dramatically different multi­

channeling characteristics. The charging of the dielec­

tric surfaces probably provides localized field enhance­

ment due to anisotropic charging.

Once the optimum trigger position, and trigger and

charging voltage polarities, were determined, modeling of

the equipotentials in the switch were done on the JASON

code at LLNL. All computer simulations were done assuming

ideal conditions; no surface charging, no degradation of

the trigger pulse and no surface irregularities. The

first computer output (Figure llA) is a simulation of the

equipotentials in a surface discharge switch without a

trigger strip added. Figure llB is the same switch

geometry, but with a trigger electrode added. All these

simulations assumed that a -40 kV charging voltage is

applied to the left hand electrode and that the trigger is

held at ground potential until a +50 kV pulse is applied

to the trigger. Figure 12A shows the equipotential lines

with a trigger pulse applied. When a trigger is applied,

the fields at the surface of the insulator are increased

at three different points. The fields at the edges of the

Page 36: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

8.00

e.oo

>- ... oo

2.00

o.oo

8.00

e.oo

>- ... 00

2.00

o.oo

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 ('f "" 00 10 0 ('I "" 10 co .- - - -

X

A. Equipotential plot without the trigger added.

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 ('I "" 00 co 0 ('I "" 10 .- -

X

B. Equipotential plot with a grounded triggger electrode added.

8 co -

Figure 11. Jason Computer Code Plot of Equipotentials With and Without a Grounded Trigger Electrode Inserted.

28

8 0 l:'t

8 0 ('f

Page 37: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

8.00

8.00

>- -4 .oo

2.00

o.oo

8 0

6.00

4.00

2.00

0.00 0 C! 0

29

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N .. "'

., 0 <'I .. ~ ., 0

~ ~ .... ~ .... N

X

A. Equipotential plot with a 50 kV pulse applied to the trigger electrode, with a -40 kV charge voltage applied.

-40 kV

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C! 0 C! C! C! C! C! N ~ CQ CQ 0 N "'d' - - -

B. Sample field line derived from the above equipotential plots.

0 0 0 C! C! C! CQ CQ 0 - - N

Figure 12. Jason Computer Code Plot of the Equipotentials With a 50 kV Trigger Pulse Applied to the Trigger Electrode and One Resulting E-field Line.

Page 38: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

30

main electrodes and at the edge of the trigger are

increased. Note that this plot does not actually show the

real fields present during the operation of the switch,

but does give an approximation of the initial conditions.

The surface charging, which is anisotropic in nature,

radically changes the tangential and normal components of

the E-fields. Figure 128 shows one sample field line

derived from the equipotential plot of Figure 12A. For

the optimum polarities (negative charging voltage and

positive trigger), the electrons are pulled toward the

surface of the insulator. When the polarities of the

charging and trigger voltages were reversed, erratic

behavior of the switch resulted, indicating that this may

be an important consideration when designing a triggered

SDS's (reported further under polarity and dielectric

effects).

The simultaneity in closure times of the channels

after triggering were determined with streak photography,

as previously mentioned in Ch. III. Figure l3A shows the

simultaneity in closure of the channels near the cathode.

Due to the nonlinearity (H-D curve) of the film, an exact

time spread can not be determined. However, the record on

most of the streak photographs indicated that the spread

in the development times is between 30-60 ns. This may

indicate that the arcs are resistive phase dominated and

that the spread in development times may be due to the low

Page 39: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Streak (top view) of the multi­channel arc closure near the cathode, 500 ns = 5 em.

t ~

B. Side view of a single arc develop­ing at the surface of a G-10 sample, 500 ns = 5 ern.

Figure 13. Streak Photographs Showing Sirnultaniety of the Multichannel Closure Near the Cathode and Single Channel Arc Develop­ment at the Surface.

31

Page 40: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

32

E-fields or low current per arc channel present in the

switch. Near the anode, however, the spread in

development time is about 5-20 ns. This may indicate that

the arc is cathode directed,thus placing the trigger near

the anode may facilitate triggering which is stabler in

terms of jitter.

Another aspect of the arc development was explored

using streak photography. With the single channel elec­

trodes in place, the arc development at the surface of the

dielectric was checked by a sideview (Figure 13B) . The

arc is seen to move up off the surface during its develop­

ment. Figure 13B shows the arc movement off the surface

(lower half of image) with respect to its reflection from

the surface. When measured at 2. 8 kA to 3 kA, the arc

moves about .3 rnrn off the dielectric. At high currents,

this may present a problem if the current is not divided

evenly between many channels. The arcs, if they push too

far off the surface, may extinguish themselves, resulting

in higher resistive and inductive losses in the switch,

but perhaps lower dielectric erosion and higher repro­

ducibility.

The predischarge current is quite important in a

switch of this type. If predischarge current was present

before triggering, reproducibility and hold-off character­

istics would be affected. Using long exposure, 200 ns in

length, triggered before the main rise of the current,

predischarge luminosity was (Figure 14) observed. This is

Page 41: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A

N

0 D

E

c A

T

H

0 D

E

c A

T

H

0 D

E

A.

Pre

dis

ch

arg

e

lum

ino

sity

, 2

00

n

s B

. O

pen

sh

utt

er

ph

oto

gra

ph

o

f ex

po

sure

, te

rmin

ati

ng

20

n

s m

ain

d

isch

arg

e.

befo

re m

ain

cu

rren

t ri

se.

Fig

ure

1

4.

Op

en S

hu

tter

Ph

oto

gra

ph

o

f M

ult

ich

an

nels

an

d

Fra

min

g

Ph

oto

gra

ph

o

f P

red

isch

arg

e

Lu

min

osi

ty.

w

w

Page 42: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

34

not surprising when compared with the long formative time

delays present in SDS's (100-200 ns). The development of

the luminosity near the cathode was compared against the

development of the luminosity near the anode. The lumi­

nosity near the anode tended to appear 100-200 ns earlier

than the luminosity near the cathode. This indicates that

the discharge is cathode directed.

Page 43: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER V

RESULTS

Polarity and Dielectric Effects

Three dielectrics, G-10, Delrin and Lucite, were

tested in dry air under all possible charging and trigger

polarities. Along with these dielectrics, teflon, poly-

ethylene, mica paper and alumina bonded to G-10 were

tested for multichanneling capabilities. Results for the

three principal dielectrics are given in terms of multi-

channeling characteristics, di (at 50% of peak) and dV (at dt dt

50% of peak and jitter measurements). Initially the rise-

time of the voltage and current waveforms were compared

[8]. After reevaluation of the data, the risetimes (10% -

90%) were found not to be a good comparison due to the

differences in wave shapes in the different cases. The

differences in peak voltage, peak current, and varying wave

shapes all resulted from the varying number of channels in

each case. The varying number of channels in multichannel

switches also affect the inductive and resistive phase

time evaluation of the arcs. In switches of the type

investigated and at the level of currents used, the arc may

or may not leave the resistive phase. Other investigators

have seen this effect and use comparisons other

35

Page 44: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

36

than the risetime of the voltage and current [9]. Through­

out the tests, a 50 kV ( 10% - 90%) trigger voltage was

used while the charging voltage was kept constant at 40

kV. The isolated (main) trigger electrode edge was

positioned 3 em from the charged electrode. The repeti-

tion rate was l-2 pps throughout the tests.

G-10, an epoxy laminate, had the best characteristics

(in terms of jitter and multichanneling) of the three rna-

terials tested (Table 1). The first case tested was with

a negative charging voltage and positive trigger. The

voltage falltime was 70 ns and the current falltime 70 ns

(Figure 15). The jitter of an initial five shots was 16

ns, however, after 500 conditioning shots, the jitter

decreased to 5 ns. The characteristic of the voltage

falltime also changed during the first 500 shots (Figure

16). The change in the wave shape may be due to the

additional channels. The additional number of channels

would decrease the discharge inductance, and add more high

frequency components to the pulse (wave shape). However,

di dV the effect of this is not clear either from the dt or dt

values .in Table l. Multichanneling characteristics also

changed as the G-10 eroded away. Initially, about 5

channels per shot were visible; after 500 shots, 8-9

channels were typical (Figure 17). All of the other

electrode polarity combinations gave considerably poorer

performance. For the case of positive charging and

Page 45: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

I 2 3 4

CH

AR

GE

VO

LTA

GE

TA

BL

E

1.

Sw

itch

ing

C

hara

cte

risti

cs o

f G

-10

as

a F

un

cti

on

o

f T

rig

ger

an

d

Ch

arg

ing

V

olt

ag

e P

ola

rit

ies

TR

IGG

ER

(5

0% o

f P

eak

) (5

0% o

f P

eak

) JI

TT

ER

P

ULS

E

d!

X

10

10

dV

X

1

01

1

dt

TIM

ES

N

O.

OF

dt

PO

LA

RIT

Y

PO

LA

RIT

Y

(A/s

ec)

(vo

lts/

sec)

(5 S

hots

) C

HA

NN

EL

S

+

2.1

2

.5

Sn

s 8

+

+

2.7

3

.0

30

ns

2

2.2

2

.3

2 --

+

2.3

2

.8

lOO

ns

3

.

CO

MM

EN

TS

Pre

fir

es

Pre

fir

es

an

d

~1isfircs

' ' I w

-.

..]

Page 46: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Voltage across the 6 ~ load. 3340 V/div., 50 ns/div.

B. Current through the 6 ~ load. 1000 A/div., 50 ns/div.

Figure 15. Voltage and Current Characteristics of G-10 for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and Positive 50 kV Trigger Voltage.

38

Page 47: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Overlay of 1st five shots. 3340 V/div. 1 20 ns/div.

B. Overlay of 1st five shots after 500 shots.3340 V/div. 1 20 ns/div.

Figure 16. Overlay of 5 Shots Showing the Effect of Conditioning on the Risetirne.

39

Page 48: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Open shutter photograph of the 1st shot.

B. Open shutter photograph of the 1st shot after 500 shots.

Figure 17. Time Integrated Photographs of Multichannels of G-10.

Anode {-

Electrode Position

t

Cathode

Anode

Electrode Position

t

Cathode

40

Page 49: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

trigger voltages, the di dt

dV and dt were

41

higher than the

aforementioned case. In this case multichanneling was

poor, resulting in only 2 channels. . dV di The h1gher dt and dt

may result from the smaller number of arcs thus increasing

the switch's inductance. Since fewer arcs are carrying

current, the current per arc is higher. Other possible

conclusions may also be drawn from these data. In the

multichannel case where there is a large number of arcs,

the arcs may be resistive phase dominated, due to the

lower current per arc. In this case if the arcs were

resistive phase dominated the lower dV dt and di

dt could

result. However, reviewing the equivalent circuit for the

6 Ohm load, the reason for the differences are not clear

since the load is complex (R + jX). The jitter (5 shots)

for the positive charging and trigger voltage case dropped

from 140 ns to approximately 30 ns after the first 500

shots. Similiarly, mul tichanneling was nonexistent for

the negative charging, negative trigger voltage case. The

jitter was too great to measure with the sweep speeds used

on the oscilloscope. Characteristics of this case includ-

ed a large number of pre fires and lower selfbreak volt-

ages. The selfbreak voltage decreased from 45 to 36 kV

after 500 shots. In the last case of positive charging and

negative trigger voltage, the voltage and the current wave

shapes varied considerably from shot to shot. The jitter

was approximately 100 ns. Multichanneling decreased from

Page 50: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

42

5 channels per shot to an average of 3 channels per shot

after the initial 500 shots. Prefires and misfires were

common for this case.

The performance of Delrin, a polyacetal, was similiar

to that of G-10 (Table 2). For the case of negative

charging and positive trigger voltage (Figure 18) the ~~

and the ~~ were slightly different from the similiar case

of G-10 (Figure 15). This may result from the fewer

number of channels or from a slight error introduced by

the interpretation of the oscilloscope trace. The jitter

was 15 ns in this case, slightly higher than the similiar

case of G-10 (Figure 15). Multichanneling remained stable

at 5 channels per shot for the entire run (Figure 19).

When the voltage and current waveforms, using Delrin, are

compared to the voltage and current characteristics of

G-10 (Figure 15), under the same conditions, a dramatic

difference is seen in the voltage wave shapes and rise-

times. However, di dV when the dt and dt values (at the 50%

point) are compared, they are within a few percent of each

other. The difference is mainly in the 70%-90% slope,

which also may indicate that in several cases the arc may

not be leaving the resistive phase as previously mention­

ed. Although the current dependence has been mentioned,

one other factor also controls this. The electric field

present at the time of triggering also affects the way the

arc develops. The effect of different trigger charging

Page 51: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

I 2 3 4

TA

BL

E

2.

Sw

itch

ing

C

hara

cte

risti

cs o

f D

elr

in as

a F

un

cti

on

o

f T

rig

ger

an

d

Ch

arg

ing

V

olt

ag

e P

ola

rit

ies

CH

AR

GE

T

RIG

GE

R

(50%

of

Pea

k)

(50%

of

Pea

k)

JIT

TE

R

NO

. V

OLT

AG

E

PU

LSE

d

! X

1

01

0

dV

X

lOll

T

IME

S

OF

PO

LA

RIT

Y

PO

LA

RIT

Y

dt

dt

(5 S

hots

) C

HA

NN

EL

S

(A/s

ec)

(vo

lts/

sec)

+

2.7

2

.4

15

ns

5

+

+

2.6

2

.1

1 --

2.8

2

.5

1 --

-

+

2.9

2

.2

1 --

~--~-

--

--

----

---

CO

MM

EN

TS

Pre

fir

es

Som

e P

re fir

es

"" w

Page 52: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Voltage across the 6 n load 3340 V/div., 50 ns/div.

B. Current through the 6 n load. 1000 A/div., 50 ns/div.

Figure 18. Voltage and Current Characteristics of Delrin for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger Pulse.

44

Page 53: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

' Anode

+

Electrode Position

t

Cathode

Figure 19. Multichanneling Characteristics of Delrin for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger Pulse. (Arc channel to the far right is the arc formed between the main electrodes and the auxiliary electrode.)

45

Page 54: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

46

polarity combinations is quite apparent when the case of

positive trigger and positive charging voltage (Figure 20)

are compared with the most successful case of negat~ve

charging voltage and positive trigger (Figure 18). The most

significant change seen

the dV dt

di and dt values

is in the wave shapes; however,

are relatively unchanged. One

explanation for the drastic wave shape changes is the final

arc phase present after triggering. If the surface charge

of Delrin differed drastically in magnitude or polarity, the

electric field needed to trigger the surface discharge would

differ from dielectric to dielectric. As discussed earlier,

if the electric field at triggering and during the discharge

is not sufficient to drive the arc out of the resistive

phase, the discharge remains resistive, which changes the

wave shape. The following chapter discusses the differences

in charge polarities and magnitudes which could account for

the different electrical characteristics of G-10, Delrin and

Lucite.

Results using Lucite, a polymethylmethacrylate

(PMMA), differed considerably from those using G-10 or

De 1 r i n ( Tab 1 e 3 ) • Once again, a negative charging voltage

and a positive trigger pulse gave the best overall re-

sults. The waveform of this case (Figure 21) compared

favorably with the simular cases for G-10 and De1rin

(Figure 15 and Figure 18, respectively). However, multi-

channeling decreased to only two channels for the Lucite

Page 55: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A.

B.

Figure 20.

Voltage across the 6 n load. 3340 V/div., 50 ns/div.

Current through the load. 1000 A/div., 50 ns/div.

Voltage and Current Characteristics of Delrin for a Positive 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger Pulse.

47

Page 56: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

I 2 3 4

TA

BL

E

3.

Sw

itch

ing

C

hara

cte

risti

cs o

f L

ucit

e as

a F

un

cti

on

o

f T

rig

ger

an

d

Ch

arg

ing

V

olt

ag

e P

ola

rit

ies

CH

AR

GE

TR

IGG

ER

(5

0% o

f P

eak

) (5

0% o

f P

eak

) JI

TT

ER

N

O.

VOLT

AG

E P

ULS

E

d!

X

101

0

dV

X lO

ll

TIM

ES

O

F P

OLA

RIT

Y

PO

LA

RIT

Y

dt

dt

(5 S

ho

ta)

CH

AN

NE

LS

(A/s

ec)

(vo

lts/

sec)

+

2.3

2

.1

40

ns

2

+

+

2.0

2

.0

1 -

2.2

2

.1

1 -

-

+

2.4

2

.0

1 -

CO

MM

EN

TS

No

Pre

fir

es

No

Pre

fire

s

~

00

Page 57: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A.

B.

Figure 21.

Voltage across the load. 3340 V/div., 50 ns/div.

Current through the load. 1000 A/div., 50 ns/div.

Voltage and Current Characteristics of Lucite for a Negative 40 kV Charge Voltage and a Positive 50 kV Trigger.

49

Page 58: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

50

dielectric. Unlike the G-10 results, the jitter was too

great to measure (with the oscilloscope sweep speeds used)

for three of the charging trigger voltage combinations,

however, no prefires or misfires were observed.

In addition to the dielectrics mentioned above, tef­

lon, bonded mica paper, polyethylene and alumina bonded to

a G-10 substrate were tested under the optimum conditions.

Teflon failed to multichannel and the triggering proved

erratic. Likewise, the mica paper had about 2 channels

per shot and triggering was unreliable. Polyethylene dif­

fered from the other two materials. Polyethylene had

about 5-7 channels per shot initially; however, multichan­

neling decreased after several hundred shots and the trig­

ger reliability became quite poor. An alumina sheet, 0.076

em thick, glued on to G-10, multichanneled quite well with

an average of 5-7 channels per shot. However, the

alumina, being brittle, cracked after only 50 shots.

Surface Charging

Using techniques described in Chapter II, Diagnostics

(field meter measurements and dusting), the surface

charging of G-10, Delrin and Lucite were assessed.

Although previously reported for some surface discharge

switches, surface charging had never been examined in

detail [ 17] . The large residual fields present in the

switch differed from insulator to insulator. These dif­

ferences in surface charging (e.g., polarity of charge,

Page 59: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

51

magnitudes, and different patterns) probably account for

the differences in mul tichanneling characteristics pre­

viously mentioned. The amount of charge present on the

surface modifies the discharge characteristics and the

delay times needed for the arc to develop at the surface

of the dielectric. The polarity of the charge and the

amount of charge present on the surface alter the time

needed for the arcs to form (space charge effects). The

charge pattern also determines, to a large extent, the

number of arcs which form and the position of formation.

If a continuous sheet of charge was present, it is likely

that only one arc would form. Subsequent arc formation

would be prevented due to rapid electric field collapse

throughout the entire length of the gap. Multichanneling

would then be prevented from the rapid voltage drop across

the one arc. However, if striated charging was present as

in the case of G-10, transient time isolation between arcs

would be provided by the localized field enhancement

regions. This transient time isolation would also allow a

spread in the formative development times as seen

previously in the streak photographs. Likewise, mottled

(nondescript) charging would inhibit arc formation due to

unenhanced field regions on oppositely charged regions

across the discharge gap. For example, the striated

charging may help to guide the path of the arc, whereas

the mottled charging may tend to also guide it, but in a

Page 60: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

52

direction that does not enhance subsequent closure of the

arc channel. The different charge patterns, striated

versus mottled, would also change the field enhancement

factors (FEF) present at the surface during the operation

of the switch. FEF' s as high as fifty percent of the

local fields have been noted on insulator surfaces [18].

The fields measured on the insulators indicate that the

average residual fields are as high as 47 percent of the

applied field (after 500 shots in the SDS). The localized

field enhancements are probably much higher.

On G-10, the residual electric field was found to be

fairly uniform when the field probe was moved parallel to

line A-A in Figure A-3, but non-uniform along line B-B.

The field probe gives the average macroscopic field due to

charges spread over several square centimeters (probe is

approximately 1 ern above the surface) . Three different

samples subjected to 500 shots, each using the parallel

electrodes (multichannel), exhibited positive charging

with the residual field near the cathode ranging from 3.8

kV/crn to 5.7 kV/crn. The residual field above the trigger

electrode varied from 7.2 kV/cm to 14 kV/crn and the 1/e

decay times for these charges ranged from 3. 85 hours to

7.4 hours. Although the decay times differed for differ­

ent samples, the general shape of the decay curve remained

approximately the same for each material type. Typical

decay curves are shown in Figure 22. Notice that after

Page 61: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

kV/ /Cm

4

2

-4

-6

-8

-14

-16

LUCITE

2 3 4 5HOURS

DELRIN

Figure 22. Charge Decay Curves ofLucite, G-10, and Delrin.

53

Page 62: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

54

all external fields were removed, the G-10 sample con­

tinued to show an increasing residual field for the first

10-15 minutes. Figure 23 shows the "dust" pattern of a

G-10 sample subjected to 500 shots. The pattern exhibits

a great deal of structure (anisotropic charging) which

was, of course, not detected with the low resolution field

probe. Single channel discharges on G-10 produced the

dust patterns shown in Figure 24. The surface shown in

Figure 24A was subjected to 850 shots at a repetition rate

of 0.12 pps, while the one shown in Figure 24B was sub­

jected to 1,000 shots at 1.3 pps. Experiments indicated

that the difference in the number of shots had no visible

effect, but samples run at the lower repetition rate

always displayed the more clearly defined pattern.

In the case of Delrin, the residual field along the

length of the dielectric varied only slightly and was

uniform across the width (line B-B, Figure A-3). The

measured field near the cathode ranged from -8.6 kV/cm to

-13.5 kV/cm for three samples, indicating negative charg­

ing of the dielectric surface. For the three different

samples, the field above the trigger electrode varied from

-6.6 kV/cm to about -8 kV/cm. A typical decay curve for

Delrin, is also shown in Figure 22. It exhibits an in­

creasing field for the first 30-40 minutes before charge

decay occurs. The 1/ e decay time in this case ranged

between 9.7 and 20 hours, significantly longer than in the

Page 63: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

-+

An

od

e

+ +

Cath

od

e

Fig

ure

2

3.

Du

st P

att

ern

o

f a

G-1

0 D

iele

ctr

ic

Sh

ow

ing

th

e

Ch

arg

e

Patt

ern

Left

o

n

the

Su

rface

by

50

0

Sh

ots

(M

ult

ich

an

nel)

.

Ul

Ul

Page 64: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A. Single channel charge pattern left by 1000 shots at 1.3 pps.

B. Single channel charge pattern left by 850 shots at .12 pps.

Figure 24. Dust Patterns Showing Surface Charges Left by Single Channel Discharges Comparing High Rep-Rate and Low Rep-Rate Operation.

56

Page 65: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

57

case of G-10. The "dusting" charge patterns on Delrin

subjected to single channel discharges were not as well

defined as the single channel discharge dust patterns on

G-10. In the multichannel case, the striated charge

regions were more widely spaced compared to the charges

left on G-10 which would account for the longer decay

times in the case of Delrin.

Lucite showed results which were quite different from

the G-10 and the Delrin. The residual field along the

length (line A-A) varied by relatively large amounts

(>> 1 kVIcm). The field near the cathode ranged from -3.8

kV I em to +1. 9 kV I em, and above the trigger electrode it

varied from -3.2 kVIcm to +2.4 kVIcm when the probe was

moved parallel to line A-A (Figure A-3) for three dif­

ferent samples. Unlike Delrin and G-10, this dielectric

showed a long charge build-up time with no detectable

decay after fifteen hours (Figure 22). Several attempts

to study the spatial charge distribution by dusting did

not reveal any definite charge pattern.

Teflon, another dielectric which failed to multi­

channel, was checked for charging patterns. Just as for

Lucite, only a mottled, nondescript pattern was observed.

Surface Analysis

surface analysis performed \'lith ESCA, SEl-l, surface

resistance and optical microscopy on G-10, Lucite and

Delrin provided an interesting insight into the processes

Page 66: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

58

involved during the operation of the switch. Optical

microscopy revealed that the G-10 typically has a cracked,

rough surface compared to the other two polymers. After

several hundred shots, the G-10 surface was in fact

rougher than the virgin surface. The other polymer

surfaces tend to be smooth even at 450 x magnification,

except for the scratches present from handling. After

several hundred shots, the other polymer surfaces tended

to become polished.

Using ESCA, the flashed-over surfaces showed no

carbonization. The Lucite and G-10 showed no sign of

chemical degradation; however, Delrin showed signs of

permanent surface damage. No signs of vapor deposition

from evaporated electrode material was seen in the dis­

charge region of the gap. However, toward the ends of the

gap, where no discharge was present, signs of metal

deposition were noted. SEM confirmed that no surface

irregularities were present on the surface of the flashed­

over samples. However, surface resistance measurements

did reveal that the surface resistance of all the dielect­

rics did drop by several orders of magnitude (Table 4).

Page 67: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

Material

G-10

G-10

Delrin

Delrin

Lucite

Lucite

Lucite

TABLE 4

Comparison of Surface Resistances Before and After Exposure to Flashover

Surface No. of Shots Resistance (ohms)

Virgin 5.0 X 1012

4000 shots 7.5 X 10 7

Virgin 2.4 X 1015

500 shots 2.3 X 1013

Virgin 3.4 X 1013

500 shots 4.3 X 1010

4000 shots 4.3 X 1010

59

Page 68: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER VI

GAS EFFECTS

Besides laboratory air

V), helium, nitrogen, SF6

,

these were tried under the

(results reported in Chapter

argon, co2 and mixtures of

"optimum" conditions ( G-1 0,

negative charging voltage and positive trigger). The

results of these tests are reported in Table 5.

Unlike the results when air was used with G-10, which

showed no visible signs of surface carbonization after

4,000 shots, most of the other gas mixtures caused

catastrophic damage after 5-6 shots. One hundred shots in

nitrogen showed light carbon tracks left on the surface;

however, rnultichanneling was still occurring at the end of

the run. The 80% N 2 + 20% SF6 mixture rnultichanneled as

indicated; however, after 5-6 shots, heavy carbonization

led to tracking and failure of the insulator (Figure 25) .

On epoxy insulators used in SF6 , this phenomenon had been

previously noted [19]. Similarly, the 20% N2 + 80% SF6

mixture formed a light carbon path on the surface and the

arc usually tracked along this path during the rest of the

run (Figure 26). The pure SF6 atmosphere also caused

tracking and failure of the insulator after only a few

shots. The argon + SF 6 mixtures behaved like the nitrogen

60

Page 69: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

61

TABLE 5

List of Gases Employed in the Switching Experiment

Gas Type Vselfbreak No. of Channels Per Shot

Air 55 kV 8-9 channels

N2 32 kV 3-4 channels

SF 6 * 1 channel

20% SF6 + 80% N2 * 3-4 channels

20% N2 + 80% SF6 * 1 channel

Argon 6 kV 1 channel

He 6 kV diffuse discharge

95% He + 5% Air 6 kV diffuse discharge

95% He + 5% N2 6 kV diffuse discharge

80% Ar + 20% SF6 46 kV 2-3 channels

20% Ar + 80% SF 6 * 1 channel

10% Ar + 10% SF6 + 80% N2 * 1 channel

C02 * 1 channel

* The system's maximum charge voltage was limited to 55 kV therefore the selfbreak voltages were not measured. How­ever in the cases shown, the switch did trigger. The pressure was kept constant at 1 atmosphere during the tests.

Page 70: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

Anode

Cathode

Figure 25. Photograph of G-10 Exposed to 6 Shots in 80% N2 + 20% SF 6 .

62"

Page 71: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

A N 0 D E

Figure 26. Photograph of G-10 Exposed to 6 Shots in 80% SF 6 + 20% N2 .

c A T H 0 D E

63

Page 72: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

64

and SF6 mixtures. When the argon, co 2 and helium gases were

used, no damage was seen on the surface even after 100

shots. The helium mixtures all gave diffuse discharges when

run at 5 kV with a 50 kV trigger applied. These discharges

appeared to be diffuse and seemed to have a high impedance

(Figure 27). Voltage and current measurements showed no

voltaqe drop across the load and no current flow through the

load at measurable levels. These diffuse type discharges

have been reported before in the 1 atmosphere range near

dielectric surfaces [20].

Figure 27. Photograph of Discharge in 5% Air + 95% He Mixture, Negative 5 kV Charge Voltage, 50 kV Trigger.

Page 73: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

CHAPTER VII

CONCLUSIONS

In reviewing the data obtained, it is clear that many

mechanisms interact to affect the performance of a surface

discharge switch. The polarity of the charging and

trigger voltages seemed extremely important, as seen from

the results of G-10, Delrin, and Lucite. The striated

charging (dust) patterns of the most successful dielectric

candidates indicate that materials which display these

surface charging patterns are the ones to employ in an

actual switch. It seems likely that the striated surface

·charge patterns actually aid in forming multichannels,

since this does modify the normal and tangential fields of

both the applied electric field and the applied trigger

fields. One experiment which would verify this hypothesis

is to apply a substance to the surface of dielectric which

would cause it to charge in this anisotropic manner. When

compared to the dielectric without the applied substance,

it would clarify whether the charging pattern is a

symptomatic behavior or the cause of the multichanneling

behavior in these switches.

Further tests which should be run include the perfor­

mance of the switch under high currents and higher

65

Page 74: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

voltages.

66

Further exploration of the erosion of the

surface at these high currents should also be investi­

gated. Although some erosion data have been reported, the

pulse wave shape and currents have measurable effects on

the amount of material actually eroded away [21, 22].

Also, the tests previously reported used relatively low

energy pulses. The jitter, voltage, and current charac­

teristics and multichannel behavior may change measurably

at higher energies. Longer current discharge times may

also affect the multichannel behavior. If the arcs do not

carry the same currents on millisecond tirnescales, some of

the arcs in a multichannel discharge may extinguish.

However, the experiments performed with different

gases, polarities, and dielectrics, indicate that the

discharge, voltage, and current characteristics and the

jitter may be tailored to some degree. This unusual

property of the surface discharge switch promises to

provide a switch sui table for many of the high current,

high voltage applications of interest in pulsed power

technology.

Page 75: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

LIST OF REFERENCES

S. I: ~ndreev, "The Use of a Spark Di~9harge_Gor Obta1n1ng Intense Light Flashes of 10 - 10 Second Duration," Soviet Physics-Technical Physics, Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 703-708, February 1963.

V. Yu Baranov, v. M. Borisov, A. M. Davidovskii, and 0. B. Khristoforov, "Use of a Discharge Over a Dielectric Surface for Preionization in Excimer Lasers," Sov. J. Quantum Electron, 11(1), pp. 42-45, January 1981.

V. Yu Baranov, v. M. Borisov, 0. B. Khristoforov, "Excimer Electric-Discharge Laser with Plasma Electrodes," Sov. J. Quantum Electron, 11(1), pp. 93-94, January 1981.

W. J. Sarjeant, "High-Pressure Surface Discharge Plasma Switches," IEEE Trans on Plasma Science, Vol. PS-8, No. 3, pp. 216-226, September 1980.

G. I. Belyaev, P. w. Dashuk, S. A. Kozak et al., "Switching of Megampere Impulse Currents by a Creeping Discharge Arrestor," Allerton Press, Inc., pp. 137-142, 1981.

6. H. M. Von Bergmann, "Triggered Multichannel Surface Spark Gaps," Journal of Physics, E, Vol. 15, No. 2, v

pp. 243-247, February 1982.

7. D. Johnson, M. Kristiansen, L. Hatfield, "Multi­channel Surface Discharge Switch," Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 1982, p. 573, Amherst, MA.

8. R. Curry, M. Kristiansen, L. Hatfield, and V. K. Agarwal, "Surface Charging of Insulators in a Surface ~ Discharge Switch," Conference on Electrical Insula-tion and Dielectric Phenomena, 1983, Buck Hill Fall, PA.

9. Dr. Nunnally, private communication.

67

Page 76: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

68

10. G. L. Jackson, "Pulsed Flashover of Solid Dielectrics in Vacuum and Gases," Ph.D. Thesis, Texas Tech Uni­versity, pp. 138-141, December 1983.

11. M. Borger, "Surface Resistivity," Senior Project, Physics Dept. Texas Tech University, 1983.

12. A. G. Bedrin, v. E. Lavrentyuk, I. v. Podmoshenskii, and P. N. Rogovtsev, "Photoinduced surface dis­charge," Sov. Phys.-Tech Phys., Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1181-1185, October 1979.

13. S. T. Pai and J. P. Marton, "A Preliminary Study of the Breakdown Mechanism of Surface Discharge Switches," IEEE Fifteenth Modulator Symposium, pp. 153-159, Baltimore, HD., 1982.

14. Y. Saito, Taro Hino, and M. Suzuki, "A Dry Tracking Resistance Test Method Using a Trigger Discharge," IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, Vol. EI-3, No. 1, pp. 18-23, February 1968.

15. S. I. Andreev, E. A. Zobov, and A. W. Sidorov, "Investigation of Sliding Spark in Air," Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp. 309-314, 1978.

16. E. L. Neau, "A Surface-Breakdown, l-lultichannel Air Gap Switch For Megampere Currents," Sandia National ~ Laboratory, Contract No. AT-(29-1)-789, March 1971.

17. J. c. ~lartin, private communication.

18. A. S. Pillai and R. Hackarn, "Modification of Electric Field at the Solid Insulator-Vacuum Interface Arising From Surface Charges on the Insulator," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 1302-1313, March 1983.

19. T. Suzuki, S. Nakayama, and T. Yoshirnitsu, "Degradation of Insulating Materials Including Sio 2 due to sF

6 Gas Dissociation Products," IEEE Trans. on

Electrical Insulation, Vol. EI-15, No. 1, pp. 53-58, February 1980.

20. Y. B. Golubovskii and R. Zonnenburg, "Discharge Contraction in Inert Gases. IV Results of Studies in Helium," sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., Vol. 25, No. 10,

21.

pp. 1220-1222, October 1980.

P. N. Dashuk, A. K. Zinchenko and M. D. Yarysheva, "Erosion of Dielectrics in the Switching of High-Pulsed Currents by a Grazing Discharge," Sov.

Page 77: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

69

Phys. Tech. Phys., Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 196-201, February 1981.

22. Y. Saito, F. Noto, "Test of Surface Electrical Failure of Organic Insulators by Means of Intermittent Dis­charges from a Capacitor," IEEE Trans. on Electrical Insulation, Vol. 1/2, pp. 2-8, March 1965.

Page 78: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

APPENDIX

The dimensions of the switch's gas chamber, the SDS

and the load are shown in Figures A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4.

The dimensions of the chamber were selected to fit the

switch dimensions (clamps not shown in Figure A-2) and to

insure that flashover on the walls did not occur. Like­

wise, the load was designed for voltage hold off and a

rep-rate power rating of 4 kW. The resistors used in the

load were 40 kV hockey puck type, made by Stackpole

(Figure A-1).

The dimensions of the transmission line were selected

to allow operation up to 55 kV. All dimensions are in

centimeters. The Figures A-3 and A-4 show the switch

without clamps, thus allowing easier viewing. Clamps (not

shown) were made of bakelite, which allowed for easy

changing and maintenance.

70

Page 79: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

~m.dia

CO

PP

ER

IN

SE

RT

S

\ L

OA

D

rR

ES

IST

OR

, Il

l ea

. -

_ ........

.... _,

._

r r

1---· f.

---~--· ~-

-··-~

~---_ __.

-·­

~---

--. 1

---·

...

~ L

1 , i

l I.

Ocm

. 14

. Ocm

.

L :

-: I

0.6

35

em

. ~

SL

9T

S

r----

---

1----

_ ~-

~ ~ --

----

-· -·-

-

_..

. ...

..J

Fig

ure

2

8.

Dim

en

sio

ns

of

the

6 ~

load

. -..

.J t-'

Page 80: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

~

---

----

----

----,

I I L -+- r I I

-------------

_j

~~---------

----

~3.8

7cu,

.~

20

.32

cm

• ~3

.87c

rn~

r-·-

----

----

----

--1

-_

r- 1 I I I I I I I

-, 1---

+-·

r I I I I I I I I

I 1.

27cm

l !

I

4

-.- 2.54

cm

.LT

em

6.

03cm

li

~

12.0

7cm

t---------i

I iJ

I

I I

I ...!

. PT

I ~

7.62

cm

I 4

I I

j I

1 •

I r-

--1

1.2

.7cm

I

L-.

....

J __

I

I +

I I

13.9

7cm

I I

~

.L

Fig

ure

2

9.

Dim

en

sio

ns

of

the

gas

ch

am

ber.

-...

.1 l'o

J

Page 81: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

-Q)

-*~--- --- ----------------1 -r-eI I 1 T

~---~-------------- ___ J (0 ~ ~ ~ 0

5 Q) ---------------~--~~ ~ 0 rt)

(\J+

~(\J

f(O

73

. Ul c 0

·.-I Ul c Q)

E ·.-I 't1

..c +J ·.-I ~

Cf.l Q Cf.l

Q)

..c +J

4-1 0

~ (1)

·.-I :.> 0.. 0 8

. 0 C"")

(1)

"-! !j tJ'l

·.-I ~

Page 82: Appr~ - ttu-ir.tdl.org

I 0 N .. .... ,~~---!!

@

74

T