17
File: AR 19-20 Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report Meeting Date 10/23/19 DATE: October 14, 2019 TO: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board FROM: Mike Sawley, AICP, Senior Planner, (879-6812, [email protected]) Community Development Department RE: Chico Mall Comprehensive Sign Program, 1950 East 20th Street, APNs Various The Chico Mall site is bounded by State Route 99, East 20th Street, Forest Avenue, Springfield Drive and the Kohl’s Shopping Center in Southeast Chico SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant proposes a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) for the Chico Mall, located on a 50-acre site at 1950 E. 20 th Street in Southeast Chico. The proposed CSP includes: (1) a Center Identification Sign, 57-feet in height, oriented toward State Route 99, (2) six other ground-mounted signs, each 20 feet in height, and (3) a common materials palette for wall-mounted signs and façade improvements to be used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board adopt the required findings contained in the agenda report and approve the CSP, subject to the recommended conditions. Proposed Motion I move that the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board adopt the required findings contained in the agenda report and approve Architectural Review 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP), subject to the recommended conditions. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to install a total of seven ground-mounted signs around the perimeter of the Chico Mall site and establish a common design theme for future wall signs and façade improvements on the mall building as tenants change over time (see Attachment A, Location Map, and Attachment B, Sign Locations). Designated Regional Commercial and located within the East 20 th Street Opportunity Site identified by the General Plan, the site is also zoned CR (Regional Commercial). The Chico Mall site is bounded by State Route 99, East 20 th Street, Forest Avenue, Springfield Drive and the Kohl’s shopping center in southeast Chico. The applicant requests approval of three types of freestanding signs at multiple locations as follows: 1. Sign A: a two-sided, freeway-oriented pylon sign with backlit lettering for the “Chico Mall” and tenant listings. Sign A would be 57 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 20 feet wide and 10 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base (see Attachment C).

Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

File: AR 19-20

Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report Meeting Date 10/23/19

DATE: October 14, 2019 TO: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board FROM: Mike Sawley, AICP, Senior Planner, (879-6812, [email protected]) Community Development Department RE: Chico Mall Comprehensive Sign Program, 1950 East 20th Street, APNs Various The Chico Mall site is bounded by State Route 99, East 20th Street, Forest

Avenue, Springfield Drive and the Kohl’s Shopping Center in Southeast Chico

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant proposes a Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) for the Chico Mall, located on a 50-acre site at 1950 E. 20th Street in Southeast Chico. The proposed CSP includes:

(1) a Center Identification Sign, 57-feet in height, oriented toward State Route 99, (2) six other ground-mounted signs, each 20 feet in height, and (3) a common materials palette for wall-mounted signs and façade improvements to be

used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board adopt the required findings contained in the agenda report and approve the CSP, subject to the recommended conditions. Proposed Motion I move that the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board adopt the required findings contained in the agenda report and approve Architectural Review 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP), subject to the recommended conditions. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to install a total of seven ground-mounted signs around the perimeter of the Chico Mall site and establish a common design theme for future wall signs and façade improvements on the mall building as tenants change over time (see Attachment A, Location Map, and Attachment B, Sign Locations). Designated Regional Commercial and located within the East 20th Street Opportunity Site identified by the General Plan, the site is also zoned CR (Regional Commercial). The Chico Mall site is bounded by State Route 99, East 20th Street, Forest Avenue, Springfield Drive and the Kohl’s shopping center in southeast Chico. The applicant requests approval of three types of freestanding signs at multiple locations as follows:

1. Sign A: a two-sided, freeway-oriented pylon sign with backlit lettering for the “Chico Mall” and tenant listings. Sign A would be 57 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 20 feet wide and 10 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base (see Attachment C).

Page 2: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 2 of 8

2. Sign B: a two-sided monument sign with backlit lettering depicting “Chico Mall.” Five instances of Sign B are requested, one at each of the public-street entrances to the mall site. Sign B would be 20 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 5.5 feet wide and 1.5 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base (see Attachment D).

3. Sign C: a two-sided pylon sign with backlit lettering for the “Chico Mall” and tenant listings. Essentially a scaled-down version of Sign A, Sign C would be 20 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 6 feet wide and 2.5 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base (see Attachment E). One instance of Sign C is requested near the intersection of Forest Avenue and Springfield Drive.

In addition to the freestanding signs listed above, a common palette of materials is provided with the proposal which would be used in conjunction with future wall-mounted signs and minor exterior façade improvements as the suites change tenants and configurations over time (see Attachment F). DISCUSSION The proposed sign package would establish a hierarchy for Chico Mall signage based on the vantage points of surrounding travelers and will freshen the mall’s appearance. The new freestanding signs are complementary in that they utilize consistent materials and convey a unified, modern design theme. Continuing to use materials from the palette for the freestanding signs as tenant improvements are made on the façade of the mall building will further improve the aesthetics of the mall over time. In the face of tremendous competition from online retailers existing brick-and-mortar retail outlets, particularly shopping malls, are severely challenged with maintaining existing tenants and acquiring new ones as vacancies occur. Just last month it was announced that the national clothing store Forever 21, which occupies one of the mall’s four anchor tenant spaces, filed for bankruptcy. With this large vacancy looming mall management is proposing new signage that would enable them to offer greater visibility for prospective future tenants. Freestanding center identification signs are typically limited to 20 feet in height and one per street frontage in the CR zoning district (see Attachment G, Sign Standards), however, a CSP may authorize deviations from the development standards for signs so long as the total maximum allowed sign area is not exceeded. In this case, the subject site represents the largest retail center in the City (comprising over 50 acres and 500,000 square feet of floor area). It is therefore warranted to consider special signage criteria acknowledging the Chico Mall’s prominence in Chico. Additional rationale and analysis for the CSP is provided by the project architect in Attachment H. The signs reflect a high-quality design which will facilitate attracting and retaining the most desirable uses of land at this regional commercial shopping mall. Allowing two center identification signs on each street frontage is justified due to the uniquely large size of the site, with multiple driveways each separated by several hundred feet. Although Sign A, at 57 feet, would be much taller than otherwise allowed for a center identification sign, it would be situated between State Route 99 and a new hotel (Hampton

Page 3: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 3 of 8

Inn & Suites, AR 17-20), which has recently been approved for construction. The new hotel will be approximately 60 feet in height, including parapets, and occupy a footprint of approximately 16,400 square feet near Springfield Drive. The presence of the hotel will largely block views of the new freeway sign from the east, limiting its visibility to just the intended audience: motorists traveling either direction on State Route 99. Importantly, the method of illumination for all proposed freestanding signs would be indirect, backlit “halo” lettering which will give a softer appearance than would internally illuminated lettering. A nighttime photo rendering of Sign A is provided below:

Together, the three freestanding sign types would create a uniformity and hierarchy of scale based on the purposes served by each. Sign A would announce the mall’s presence as the hub of a regional commercial area to regional travelers using State Route 99; Sign B would

Page 4: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 4 of 8

provide basic, discrete wayfinding at each entry point to the mall from public surface streets; and Sign C would be a version of Sign A scaled down to 20 feet in height, which is an appropriate size for its location at the corner of Forest Avenue and Springfield Drive. The proposed CSP is consistent with Design Guidelines that encourage signage which enhances a project’s identity, while also respecting the site’s architecture and character of the nearby streetscape (DGs 1.3.51 and 1.6.11). The project is also consistent with DGs that call for signs and lettering of appropriate size for their site and, as conditioned, avoiding excessive illumination that could negatively impact night skies in the area (DGs 1.6.12, 1.6.13 and 1.6.14). Overall, the style and placement of the proposed signs is compatible with the existing mall buildings and surrounding uses, and will heighten visibility and enhance wayfinding for the mall tenants. Staff recommends approval of the project. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL Environmental Review The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15311 (Accessory Structures). Consistent with this exemption, the project consists of minor structures that are appurtenant to an existing regional commercial shopping mall, including but not limited to on-premise signs. Architectural Review According to the Chico Municipal Code Section 19.18.060, the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board (Board) shall determine whether or not a project adequately meets adopted City standards and design guidelines, based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific

plan, and any applicable neighborhood or area plans.

The proposed signs will aid wayfinding to the Chico Mall for motorists using major surrounding roadways, including State Route 99, consistent with General Plan Policy LU-5.1 direction to facilitate increased intensity of development and revitalization of the East 20th Street corridor, and the vision statement for the East 20th Street Opportunity Site, which highlights the mall’s “convenient location near an exit from State Route 99 [which] increases its revitalization potential as a thriving regional commercial center.” Allowing the freeway-oriented sign at the maximum height limit for the zoning district (57 feet), would support visibility for the multiple co-anchor tenants of the mall and is consistent with Action LU-5.1.1 (Incentives for Opportunity Site Development), which encourages the City to utilize incentives identified in Action LU-2.3.1 to support economic development opportunities, including flexibility in development standards on designated Opportunity Sites. No aspects of the proposed signs have been identified as inconsistent with the General Plan. The site is not included in the City’s Historic Inventory or located within a Neighborhood Plan or area plan.

Page 5: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 5 of 8

2. The proposed development, including the character, scale, and quality of design are consistent with the purpose/intent of this chapter and any adopted design guidelines.

The signs reflect a high-quality design which will facilitate attracting and retaining the most desirable uses of land at this regional commercial shopping mall. The proposal is consistent with Design Guidelines that encourage signage that enhances a project’s identity, while also respecting the site’s architecture and character of the nearby streetscape (DGs 1.3.51 and 1.6.11). The project is also consistent with DGs that call for signs and lettering of appropriate size for their site and, as conditioned, avoiding excessive illumination that could negatively impact night skies in the area (DGs 1.6.12, 1.6.13 and 1.6.14).

3. The architectural design of structures, including all elevations, materials and colors are

visually compatible with surrounding development. Design elements, including screening of equipment, exterior lighting, signs, and awnings, have been incorporated into the project to further ensure its compatibility with the character and uses of adjacent development.

The modern design, materials and colors of the proposed new signs are visually compatible with the comparable upgrades anticipated for the existing mall building and existing detached restaurant buildings, specifically regarding the use of individually-mounted backlit letters, words and symbols rather than a plastic-faced cabinet design. Electrical wiring for the new signs will properly screened through concealment within the supporting structure.

4. The location and configuration of structures are compatible with their sites and with

surrounding sites and structures, and do not unnecessarily block views from other structures or dominate their surroundings.

The proposed CSP consists of seven new freestanding signs, each of which are appropriately scaled for the locations where they are proposed and will not unnecessarily block views or cause the site to dominate its surroundings. Once the new, approximately 60-foot tall Hampton Inn hotel is constructed between the freeway pylon sign and Springfield Drive the new pylon sign will blend into the landscape of commercial development in the area and will only be obvious to motorists using State Route 99.

5. The general landscape design, including the color, location, size, texture, type, and coverage of plant materials, and provisions for irrigation and maintenance, and protection of landscape elements, have been considered to ensure visual relief, to complement structures, and to provide an attractive environment.

The proposal consists of seven freestanding signs that will be located in existing or proposed landscaped areas with a minimum of two square feet of landscaping for each square foot of sign face as required by the municipal code.

Comprehensive Sign Program Findings According to the Chico Municipal Code Section 19.74.070, in approving a CSP, the Board shall determine whether or not a project adequately meets all of the following findings in addition to those required by Chapter 19.18:

Page 6: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 6 of 8

1. The proposed Comprehensive Sign Program is consistent with the purpose and intent of this chapter;

The proposal effectively uses flexibility allowed by the CSP process by using well-designed, aesthetically pleasing signs that reflect a modern design theme and are appropriately scaled based on the immediate viewsheds and travel modes of potential customers within the parking area and on surrounding roadways.

2. The signs are visually related to other signs included in the Comprehensive Sign Program and to the structure and/or developments they identify and to surrounding development;

The new signs will visually relate to one another and the CSP design criteria will establish a consistent palette of materials that will result in a unifying theme for the mall over time. The modern style of the signs will complement existing and new development planned in and around the Chico Mall.

3. The Comprehensive Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in use or tenants; and

Conditions have been included to accommodate future changes to the sign program, specifying that staff may administratively approve substitutions of similar signs or new signs that meet code requirements for the zoning district.

4. The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with all of the standards of this chapter, including the maximum overall sign area allowable, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to individual sign area, number, location, and/or height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign Program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of this chapter. The sign program complies with the standards of CMC 19.74, with flexibility given to: (1) the height of a freeway-oriented pylon sign which is approved up to a height of 57 feet above finished grade, and (2) the number of center identification signs, two of which are approved on each public street frontage. Illumination of copy on the pylon signs would be backlit as opposed to internally illuminated letters, and therefore will not negatively affect nearby properties. Allowing added height for the freeway pylon sign would enhance the viability of the East 20th Street business area, consistent with stated purposes of the City’s sign ordinance to: encourage signs that are well-designed, balanced, and pleasing in appearance; protect and enhance the character of business areas, provide a reasonable system of sign controls, and to accommodate the need for signs to direct members of the public to the various destinations contained in the City’s largest retail and service environment for public convenience.

RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. All approved building plans and permits shall note on the cover sheet that project signage shall comply with AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP). No building permits related to this approval shall be finaled without authorization of Planning staff.

Page 7: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 7 of 8

2. The signs and common materials approved under this Comprehensive Sign Program are shown on the accompanying drawings date-stamped October 14, 2019, by the Planning Services Division and include the following:

a. Sign A: a two-sided, freeway-oriented pylon sign with backlit lettering for the “Chico Mall” and tenant listings. Sign A is 57 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 20 feet wide and 10 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base. One instance of Sign A is approved near the site’s frontage on State Route 99.

b. Sign B: a two-sided monument sign with backlit lettering depicting “Chico Mall.” Sign B is 20 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 5.5 feet wide and 1.5 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base. Up to 5 instances of Sign B are approved, one at each vehicle entrance to the mall site from adjacent public streets.

c. Sign C: a two-sided pylon sign with backlit lettering for the “Chico Mall” and tenant listings. Essentially a scaled-down version of Sign A, Sign C is 20 feet in height above finished grade and approximately 6 feet wide and 2.5 feet in profile depth, with a larger supporting base. One instance of Sign C is approved near the intersection of Forest Avenue and Springfield Drive.

d. Wall signs: future wall signs and façade improvements on the main mall building shall demonstrate architectural consistency with the approved shared materials palette, subject to administrative approval by planning staff.

Signs under this approval may be substituted over time with new signs of substantially similar style, or any new sign that meets typical sign code requirements for the district.

3. Illumiation of the freestanding signs under this approval shall not be brighter than the

illumination limit recommended by the International Sign Association (ISA) for Electronic Message Center signs, or 0.3 footcandles above ambient light when measured at the recommended distance as set forth by the ISA.

4. It is acknowledged that the existing main mall building contains up to four anchor tenants for the purposes of determining allowable wall signage area for individual business identification

5. All approved building plans and permits shall note that exposed conduit, mounting brackets, flashing, and similar visible hardware and appurtenances shall be painted using appropriate colors. Adequate finishing details for the sign installation shall be verified by Planning staff prior to permit final.

6. The permittee shall comply with all other State and local Code provisions, including those of the Building Division, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and California Department of Transportation. The permittee is responsible for contacting these offices to verify the need for permits.

7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Chico, its boards and commissions, officers and employees against and from any and all liabilities,

Page 8: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) ARHPB Mtg. 10/23/19 Page of 8 of 8

demands, claims, actions or proceedings and costs and expenses incidental thereto (including costs of defense, settlement and reasonable attorney’s fees), which any or all of them may suffer, incur, be responsible for or pay out as a result of or in connection with any challenge to or claim regarding the legality, validity, processing or adequacy associated with: (i) this requested entitlement; (ii) the proceedings undertaken in connection with the adoption or approval of this entitlement; (iii) any subsequent approvals or permits relating to this entitlement; (iv) the processing of occupancy permits and (v) any amendments to the approvals for this entitlement. The City of Chico shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding which may be filed and shall cooperate fully in the defense, as provided for in Government code section 66474.9.

PUBLIC CONTACT A notice was published in the Chico Enterprise Record 10 days prior to the meeting date, notices were mailed out to all property owners and tenants within 500 feet of the project site, and two notices were placed on the project site. The meeting agenda was posted at least 10 days prior to the Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board meeting. ATTACHMENTS

A. Location Map B. Site Plan C. Sign A Details D. Sign B Details E. Sign C Details F. Materials Palette for Signage and Future Façade Improvements G. Signage Criteria for CR Zoning District H. Architect’s Narrative

Provided Under Separate Cover:

Chico Mall Signage Comprehensive Program Revision 10/14/19 DISTRIBUTION Bruce Ambo, Principal Planner Mike Sawley, Senior Planner Matt Gallaway via email: [email protected] Files: AR 19-20 (Chico Mall CSP) X:\Current Planning\AR\2019\20 Chico Mall CSP\ARHPB report 10-23-19.doc

Page 9: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!! ! !

!!! !! !!! !!

! !! !!!

!!

!

!!

!! ! !

!

!!!! !

!!

!!

! !!!!

!!!

!!!

!

! !!!

!! !!!! ! !! !

!!!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!!!!!

!

!

!!

!!! !!

! !!

!

!!

!! !! ! !

!!!!!!

! ! ! ! !!!!

!!!! !! !!! !! ! !! !! !!

!

!! !!! !!

!! !

! ! !!!!!! !! !!

! !!

!! !

! ! !!

! ! !!! !! !!

!! !!

!!

! !!! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! !

! !

! ! !! !! !!!! ! !!

! !! !! !! !! ! !! !

! ! !! !!

!!

! !!!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! ! !!! ! !!

!! !!

!! ! !!

!!

!

!!

!!! !

! !

!! !!

!! ! !

!

!!

! !!!

!! !! !

! !!!!

!

!! ! !!

!!!!

!!! !

! !!! !! !! ! !! ! !

!!

!

!!

!

!

!! !

!

!!

!

!! !! !

WISCONSIN ST

FORESTAVE

OHIO ST

VIRGINIA ST

E 19TH ST

ST HWY 99

C ST

HARTFORD DR

BUSINESS LN

WESTMINSTER CT

FETTER ST

E 16TH ST

CLEVELAND AVE

MARILYN DR

AUBURN OAK WAY

RID GEB ROOKWAY

BRENDADR

D ST

HU NTINGTONDR

GUILL ST

E 20TH ST

KEVIN CT

KENRICK LN

MALL

DRIVE

WAY

MADISON ST

COLORADO ST

BROCTON LN LN

DANFORTH LN

BETSEY WAY

SB HWY 99 ONRAMP

BANEY LN

NBHW

Y9 9OF FRAMP

NB HWY 99 ONRAMP

SB HWY 99 OFFR AM P

SPRINGFIELD DR

BARTRI ANGLE ST

SHARI LNFAIRMONT TERR

BEDFORD DR

FERNCREEKLN

NOTREDAME

BLVD

DEV O

NSHIR

E

DR

MANSFIELD CT

DRMARTIN LUTHER KING JR PKWY

AR 19-20 (Chico Mall Signage)1950 East 20th StreetAPNs Various

¸0 250

Feet

500'

! Notified AddressesNotified Parcels

PROJECTSITE

TIECHERTPONDS

20TH STPARK

Attachm

ent A

Page 10: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment B

Page 11: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment C

Page 12: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment D

Page 13: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment E

Page 14: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Signage Connection to Façade –Shared Materials

Nichiha Tuffblock, Color: SteelOmegaflex plaster system painted SW 7018 Dovetail

Chemetal Cascade Brushed Aluminum, to be used in future 

façade design

*Conceptual façade design for illustrative purposes only

Potential Lighting Methods

AEPSpan metal profile, Color: Old Town Gray

Attachm

ent F

Page 15: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Chico Municipal Code SIGNS TABLE 5-8

SIGN STANDARDS BY ZONING DISTRICT (Continued)

I. Signs Permitted in the CR (Regional Commercial) Zoning District (Continued)

Maximum Maximum Maximum Location Sign Class Sign Type Number Sign Area Sign Height Requirements

Multi-tenant sites, shopping centers

1. Center identification Ground-mounted I per street 100 s.f. per sign 20 ft. Sign shall be frontage face, 200 s.f. set back 5 ft.

minimum and from property 400 s.f. max. per lines and shall sign not block sight

distance area

2. Business identification Monument 1 per street 16 s.f. per sign 5 ft. Sign shall be (detached buildings frontage i f face, 32 s.f. set back 5 ft. greater than 10,000 s.f. located within maximum per from property gross floor area) 50 ft. o f public sign lines and shall

street not block sight distance area

3. Business identification Wall 1 per street 2 s. f. o f sign Below eave frontage and/or area per linear per customer foot of bldg. public frontage for entrance. ground floor

uses. 0.5 s.f. per linear foot of business frontage for uses on second or higher floors. 32 s.f. minimum and 200 s.f. max. per business.

Lighting Allowed? Additional Requirements

Yes Allowable in addition to other signs for individual businesses.

Yes Total allowable sign area includes wall, monument, and awning signs.

Yes Total allowable sign area includes wall, monument, and awning signs.

Anchor tenants within a multi-tenant siteare allowed up to 75 percent additional s.f., 350 s.f. maximum per business.

Attachm

ent G

Page 16: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment H

Page 17: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report ... · used on the mall building itself as tenants change over time. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review

Attachment H