Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Area Wide Optimization Program
Individual Program
Background Information
2021
Alabama Department of Environmental Management
Official Recognition of AWOP
Please provide the AWOP start date and describe any official recognition of AWOP in agency
newsletters, web pages, awards programs, annual meetings, etc.
Officially started AWOP in 1997. Alabama implemented activities prior to officially starting AWOP. Prior
to 1997, the State had a goal of 0.2 NTU when the limit was 0.5 NTU and 0.5 NTU when the limit was 1.0
NTU.
In 2003, Alabama began issuing awards to water treatment plants that meet the turbidity optimization
goals.
In 1999, Alabama began holding a state wide “Surface Water Meeting” at which optimization activities
are discussed along with other pertinent topics.
In 2016, US EPA Region 4 started issuing congratulatory letters to water systems who had a water
treatment plant that met the turbidity optimization goals.
In 2019, AWOP was added to ADEM’s Drinking Water page which can be accessed at
http://adem.alabama.gov/programs/water/drinkingwater/awop.cnt.
Official Adoption of AWOP Goals
Please describe when and how AWOP goals were adopted by your agency and communicated to the
water systems.
AWOP goals have not been officially adopted by ADEM. However, parts of the goals were incorporated
into regulations for the construction of new water treatment plants or water treatment plants desiring
to increase their filtration rate. The program is supported by all levels of management, even though
AWOP is considered a voluntary program.
Communication of AWOP to water systems is accomplished through on-site discussion (including AWOP
printouts) with water systems during their yearly inspection, presentations at various conferences and
meetings, presentation of Optimization Awards at the Annual Surface Water Meeting, a display at the
Alabama Rural Water Association’s Annual Conference, and through regular communication with water
systems.
National Optimization Goals adopted by your PWSS Program – Check all that apply:
(refer to Attachment I for descriptions of the NOLT optimization goals.)
Water Treatment Plants
Microbial (Turbidity): Raw Water_X___ Individual Settled_X___ CFE____ IFE__X__
Post BW w/FTW_X___ Post BW wo/FTW____ Disinfection (CT) _X___
DBPs (TTHM/HAA5): Plant Effluent__X__ Enhanced Coagulation__X__ Disinfection__X__
Chloramine Application: Ammonia Control____ Dosing (Chlorine & Ammonia) ____
Distribution Systems
Individual Site DBPs __X__ Long Term System DBPs_X___ Tank Operations_X___
Secondary Disinfection, Free Chlorine __X__
Secondary Disinfection, Chloramines (monochloramine, Ammonia & Nitrite) ____
Modifications to the national goals or other optimization goals utilized by your Agency:
Please describe any modified AWOP goals and/or any additional optimization goals adopted by your
agency and communicated to the water systems.
Microbial Goal Modifications:
• Raw water turbidity is required to be recorded at least every 2 hours or continuous if filtration rate is above 2.0 gpm/SQ FT.
• By regulation CFE is not allowed in Alabama.
• Disinfection is handled differently in Alabama. WTP’s have to meet a CT of 70. This is a worst case scenario for disinfection and only requires WTP’s to report the minimum free chlorine level leaving the WTP for each day.
• Chloramines are not utilized in Alabama in our community water systems. Disinfection Byproducts and TOC Modifications
• Alabama has adopted goals for the WTP effluent of 20 ppb for TTHMs and 15 ppb for HAA5. Monitoring of WTP effluent is mandatory.
• Total organic carbon goals are based on an annual WTP effluent of 1.7 mg/L or less. Alabama does not use the performance ratio for optimization purposes.
• Secondary disinfection is accomplished through the use of free chlorine, chloramines are not utilized.
• DBP monitoring is required at all master meters by the parent system. Ground water systems or systems with low DBPs can obtain a waiver.
• Joint OELs are required anytime a consecutive water system incurs a violation. All water systems from the point of production to consumption are required to complete the report and hold quarterly meetings until all water systems in the chain have returned to compliance.
Distribution System Modifications
• Water storage tanks should turn over in 4 days or less.
• pH of the distribution system should remain consistent (± 0.3 units) with the water leaving the producing WTP.
• Corrosion control should be implemented to minimize corrosion in the distribution system, especially to prevent changes of pH in the distribution system. No specific goals have been adopted as this area as it is currently under development.
Description of Current AWOP Team Members and Responsibilities
Please provide the name, position/title, description of AWOP duties and approximate FTE that each
team member spends on AWOP. Also indicate who serves as the AWOP team lead/point of contact.
Example: Nevel O. Meter, District Engineer, PBT trainer, ~ 0.3 FTE
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2015, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
1. William McClimans AWOP Team Leader; District Engineer; SWTR, DBPR and Laserfiche Coordinator, PBT Trainer
2. Laura Taylor Assistant AWOP Team Leader; System Inspector; CCR, PBT Trainer 3. Arshasmine Tellis System Inspector; Assistant SDWIS and Permit Database Coordinator; PBT Facilitator 4. Marc Chapman District Engineer; SRF & Grant Coordinator; PBT Facilitator 5. Aimee White District Engineer; PBT Facilitator; Permit Database Coordinator, RMP Coordinator 6. Jack Mobley District Engineer; PBT Facilitator, Lead and Copper Coordinator 7. Deja Collis District Engineer, 8. Robert Compton District Engineer, Cyanotoxin Lead 9. Brett Newton District Engineer
AWOP is considered a voluntary program and is in addition to required duties. Staff members use time management to provide time to conduct AWOP activities.
Description of Former AWOP Team Members:
Please provide the name of former AWOP team members, and their reason for leaving the team. This
information is for historical purposes and also to support networking as AWOP continues to expand.
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2015, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
1. Joe Alan Power Retired
2. Keith Lowery Retired
3. Charlie Davis Retired
4. Mark Anderson Transferred within ADEM
5. Benny Laughlin Other duties assigned.
6. Shannon Golden Transferred to ALDOT
7. Craig Holloway Transferred to Alabama Military Department, now back at ADEM in different division.
8. James Daily Transferred to SRF, now retired.
9. Tom Garrett Transferred to SRF, now retired.
10. Jim Ramsey Retired
11. William “Billy” Byars Left state government.
12. Chris Griffin Left state government.
13. Anthony Roberts Transferred within ADEM
14. Taylor Littleton Left state government.
Inventory of State-Wide Treatment Facilities1 Number
Rapid rate filtration treatment plants2,3
Utilizing static settling without tubes or plates 60
Utilizing static settling with tubes or plates 17
Utilizing sludge blanket clarification (upflow, pulsator) 1
Utilizing contact adsorption clarification 3
Utilizing sludge recirculation (including ballasted clarification) 1
Utilizing DAF, or other alternative clarification process 1
Utilizing direct/in-line filtration 8
Utilizing packaged filtration (package plants) 6
Slow sand filter plants 0
Diatomaceous earth filter plants 0
Membrane treatment plants 16
Bag or cartridge filtration plants 0
Primary disinfectant
Free chlorine 97
Chloramines 0
Ozone 0
UV 0
Secondary disinfectant
Free chlorine 97
Chloramines 0
1Limited to surface water treatment plants (includes surface, GUDI, blended sources).
2All surface water treatment plants, except cartridge, membrane and slow sand.
3When a plant utilizes multiple treatment processes or configurations identified below, please
include them all in this inventory, e.g., a package plant that utilizes a CAC will be included as a rapid
rate plant using CAC and packaged filtration.
AWOP Vision:
Please describe the vision for your AWOP
That every member of the AWOP team is capable of conducting/operate every part of the AWOP
program on their own or coordinate a larger group to carry out AWOP activities to help our water
systems provide the best possible water quality to their customers. To help achieve and maintain
compliance rates above 98%.
Status Component Implementation:
Please describe status component activities that are implemented in your agency, e.g., (are water
systems ranked according to public health risk and how is this information used; how is water system
data integrity ensured):
Water systems are ranked according to their performance in relation to the AWOP goals. The ranking
lists are used as a guide when deciding which water systems to target with AWOP assistance.
Data integrity is still an area where we need to do more work.
Targeted Performance Improvement (TPI) Implementation:
Please list all activities that are implemented as TPI activities in your state, e.g., CPEs, PBT,
Enhanced Sanitary Surveys, technical assistance, other): CPE, PBT, CTA, TTA, ESS, TA and anything else
we can come up with.
AWOP Maintenance Component Implementation:
Integrate
Please check the following areas where AWOP has been integrated into the PWSS Program:
Plan Reviews_X____ Permitting__X___ Capacity Development_____ Operator Training___X__
Technical Assistance__X___ DWSRF Prioritization_____ Enforcement_____ Sanitary Surveys_X_
Other(identify)________________________________________________________
Enhance
Please describe any AWOP enhancements that have been implemented in your program. One
example could include modifying status component criteria
Recently the turbidity ranking list was automated (as best as possible) to eliminate unnecessary time
by doing point calculation by hand. The point ranking list was redone to remove personal opinion
and allow for complete automation of score.
Sustain
Please describe any activities that you implement to sustain your agency’s AWOP. Some examples
could include efforts to promote and incentivize AWOP (e.g., publish regular newsletter, awards
program, AWOP participation = higher ranking for grant/loan funding, etc.).
Optimization presentations are given at different in state conferences.
ADEM each year issues awards to water systems who have met the microbial (turbidity) goals.
Lessons Learned:
Please list “lessons learned” that you feel would be helpful to other programs, e.g., how to build and
maintain internal support, how to integrate AWOP into your PWSS program, etc). If you are new to
AWOP, please list a question or concern you’d like to know more about.
One lesson learned is that water systems in PBT do better when their manager attends all the sessions
(not just first and last). These systems are more energized and willing to complete the work as they see
the benefit of the additional work.
One other lesson learned was that you can stratify water mains, even a 10-inch water main.
Attachment I: Optimization Goals Adopted by the NOLT
Category Goal Applies to Description
Microbial Minimum Data Monitoring Goal
Raw Water Turbidity
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Record maximum daily raw water turbidity.
Microbial
Individual Sedimentation Basin
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 2 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is > 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 1 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is ≤ 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Record individual sedimentation basin effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 4-hours or less if taking grab samples, or
15 minutes or less for continuous monitoring.
Microbial
Individual and Combined Filter
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Combined filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings. Optimization is based on the daily maximum values
recorded from all readings.
― Individual filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings (excluding 15-minute period following filter backwash).
Optimization is based on the daily maximum values recorded
from all readings.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
without filter-to-waste capability: Maximum individual filter
effluent turbidity following backwash ≤ 0.30 NTU and achieve ≤
0.10 NTU within 15 minutes.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
with filter-to-waste capability: Minimize individual filter effluent
turbidity during filter-to-waste period and record maximum
value. Return the filter to service at ≤ 0.10 NTU.
― Record individual and combined filter effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 1-minute or less for continuous
monitoring.
Microbial
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
― Record disinfectant residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations.
Disinfection By-
Product
Plant Effluent Disinfection
Byproducts (DBPs)
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―System Specific Targets: Could be a discrete value or range
that is based on a running annual average. Recommended goal
value/range should be 30% to 50% of long term LRAA goals (e.g.,
20-30 ppb for TTHM, 15-20 ppb for HAA5).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly plant effluent DBP samples; for systems not in
compliance, collect monthly plant effluent samples.
Disinfection By-
Product
Enhanced Coagulation
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet Stage 1 D/DBP Rule TOC removal requirements for
enhanced coagulation, which are based on source water
alkalinity and TOC levels, or an alternative compliance criterion,
as a running annual average (RAA) of the performance ratio
(actual TOC removal/required TOC removal) plus a factor of
safety of 10% (or performance ratio ≥ 1.1).
―Collect monthly total organic carbon samples for raw and
treated water.
Disinfection By-
Product
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring Goal
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
―Record disinfection residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations (only applies to parent
systems).
Distribution
System
Disinfection Byproducts
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize any
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Individual Site Goal: Quarterly Maximum Locational Running
Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed 70/50 ppb.
―Long-Term System Goal: Average of Maximum Locational
Running Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed
60/40 ppb (the average of the last 8 quarters cannot exceed
60/40 ppb).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly DBP samples at all compliance locations; for
systems not in compliance, collect monthly samples.
Free Chlorine
Distribution
System
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize Free
Chlorine as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 0.20 mg/L free chlorine residual at all monitoring
sites in the distribution system, at all times.
―Monitoring should be performed at least monthly, but more
frequently at critical times (i.e., summer months).
―Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP
compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant
effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably
while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative
sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the
system, four sites total).
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Disinfection: Ammonia Control
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a detectable free ammonia residual in the plant
effluent ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
―Monitor free ammonia at least once per day in the plant
effluent.
• The monitoring frequency may be adjusted based on the variability observed over an extended period of time.
• Free ammonia may be monitored in the source water periodically (e.g., once per week) to assess variability.
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Operational Guideline
Chlorine and Ammonia Dosing
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a chlorine-to-nitrogen mass ratio between 4.5:1 and
5.0:1 (or chlorine-to-ammonia mass ratio between 3.7:1 and
4.1:1), which should result in a detectable free ammonia in the
plant effluent that is ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
Chloramine
Distribution
System
Disinfection: Monochloramine
and Nitrification-Related
Parameters
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 1.50 mg/L monochloramine residual at all
monitoring sites in the distribution system, at all times, to
provide a disinfection barrier against both microbial
contamination and nitrification prevention.
―Monitor monochloramine, free ammonia, and nitrite in the
distribution system and at the entry points (to establish a
baseline).
• Monochloramine and free ammonia should be monitored at all sample locations.
• Nitrite should be monitored at sample locations where monochloramine is ≤ 1.50 mg/L; nitrate may also be monitored, to further assess nitrification.
• Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the system, four sites total).
• Monitoring should be done at least monthly, but more frequently at critical times (e.g., summer months).
Distribution
System
Operational Guidelines
Tank Operations
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Contain
Storage
Tanks (any
secondary
disinfectant)
―Maintain an average turnover time < 5 days; or establish and
maintain a water turnover rate at each storage facility.
―Maintain good mixing (i.e., Performance Ratio ≥ 1) at all times;
for tanks where the PR cannot be calculated, adequate mixing
(i.e., uniform water quality) should be confirmed by alternate
means (e.g., tank profiling/water quality sampling).
Area Wide Optimization Program
Individual Program
Background Information
2021
Name of Agency:
Official Recognition of AWOP
Please provide the AWOP start date and describe any official recognition of AWOP in agency
newsletters, web pages, awards programs, annual meetings, etc.
The Florida Area-Wide Optimization Program began in 2002. However, the program lapsed temporarily
before recently restarting following several reorganizations of staff.
Currently, Florida is in the process of rebuilding and developing a long-term outlook for the program.
We have created a new AWOP webpage for the FL Department of Environmental Protection’s website,
an AWOP Information SharePoint folder for primacy office staff, and we are in the process of initiating
quarterly meetings to be held following the R4 quarterly meetings.
Official Adoption of AWOP Goals
Please describe when and how AWOP goals were adopted by your agency and communicated to the
water systems.
N/A
National Optimization Goals adopted by your PWSS Program – Check all that apply:
(refer to Attachment I for descriptions of the NOLT optimization goals.)
N/A
Water Treatment Plants
Microbial (Turbidity): Raw Water____ Individual Settled____ CFE____ IFE____
Post BW w/FTW____ Post BW wo/FTW____ Disinfection (CT) ____
DBPs (TTHM/HAA5): Plant Effluent____ Enhanced Coagulation____ Disinfection____
Chloramine Application: Ammonia Control____ Dosing (Chlorine & Ammonia) ____
Distribution Systems
Individual Site DBPs ____ Long Term System DBPs____ Tank Operations____
Secondary Disinfection, Free Chlorine ____
Secondary Disinfection, Chloramines (monochloramine, Ammonia & Nitrite) ____
Modifications to the national goals or other optimization goals utilized by your Agency:
Please describe any modified AWOP goals and/or any additional optimization goals adopted by your
agency and communicated to the water systems.
N/A
Description of Current AWOP Team Members and Responsibilities
Please provide the name, position/title, description of AWOP duties and approximate FTE that each
team member spends on AWOP. Also indicate who serves as the AWOP team lead/point of contact.
Example: Nevel O. Meter, District Engineer, PBT trainer, ~ 0.3 FTE
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2017, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
10. AWOP Team Leader: Deirdre Thomas – Source and Drinking Water (SDW)
Environmental Consultant, AWOP Coordinator
11. Chris Melkun – SDW Environmental Specialist 12. Jamie Shakar – SDW Environmental Administrator
13. District DEP SDW Staff-Technical Assistance, Compliance and Enforcement
14. Approved County Health Department SDW Staff-Technical Assistance, Compliance and
Enforcement
15. Florida Rural Water Association Staff, SDW Technical Assistance
Description of Former AWOP Team Members:
Please provide the name of former AWOP team members, and their reason for leaving the team. This
information is for historical purposes and also to support networking as AWOP continues to expand.
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2017, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
15. Jeffrey Lawson – left state government
16. John Pope – Retirement
17. Rich Cantin – Retirement
18. Joni Synatschk – left state government
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Inventory of State-Wide Treatment Facilities1 Number
Rapid rate filtration treatment plants2,3 11
Utilizing static settling without tubes or plates N/A
Utilizing static settling with tubes or plates N/A
Utilizing sludge blanket clarification (upflow, pulsator) N/A
Utilizing contact adsorption clarification N/A
Utilizing sludge recirculation (including ballasted clarification) 3
Utilizing DAF, or other alternative clarification process N/A
Utilizing direct/in-line filtration 0
Utilizing packaged filtration (package plants) N/A
Slow sand filter plants 10
Diatomaceous earth filter plants 2
Membrane treatment plants N/A
Bag or cartridge filtration plants N/A
Primary disinfectant
Free chlorine 4818
Chloramines 263
Ozone 31
UV 5
Secondary disinfectant
Free chlorine N/A
Chloramines N/A
1Limited to surface water treatment plants (includes surface, GUDI, blended sources).
2All surface water treatment plants, except cartridge, membrane and slow sand.
3When a plant utilizes multiple treatment processes or configurations identified below, please
include them all in this inventory, e.g., a package plant that utilizes a CAC will be included as a rapid
rate plant using CAC and packaged filtration.
AWOP Vision:
Please describe the vision for your AWOP
The vision for Florida’s AWOP is to ensure all water systems in the state are aware of the program, and
to achieve compliance improvements by being more proactive with our water systems and staff. This
will include continuing to attend workshops, training of staff, continual promoting of AWOP information
and tools to the water systems, as well as performing CPEs and PBTs within the next couple of years. By
becoming proficient in a few more of the basic AWOP elements, the plan is to implement a more well-
rounded program, consisting of regular state meetings, training sessions and ultimately an awards
program. We are also wanting to implement AWOP into our compliance and enforcement and sanitary
survey procedures. With these implementations, the intent is to achieve better compliance (i.e. DBPs)
within the state, and to continue to maintain that compliance.
Status Component Implementation:
Please describe status component activities that are implemented in your agency, e.g., (are water
systems ranked according to public health risk and how is this information used; how is water system
data integrity ensured):
N/A
Targeted Performance Improvement (TPI) Implementation:
Please list all activities that are implemented as TPI activities in your state, e.g., CPEs, PBT, Enhanced
Sanitary Surveys, technical assistance, other):
Currently in the planning stages of integrating AWOP into our sanitary survey protocols as well as
technical assistance from our rural water association staff.
AWOP Maintenance Component Implementation:
Integrate
Please check the following areas where AWOP has been integrated into the PWSS Program:
Plan Reviews_____ Permitting_____ Capacity Development_____ Operator Training_____
Technical Assistance_X__ DWSRF Prioritization_____ Enforcement_X__ Sanitary Surveys_X_ Other
(identify)________________________________________________________
Currently in the planning stages of integrating AWOP into our compliance & enforcement protocols
as well as Sanitary Surveys, and technical assistance from our rural water association staff.
Enhance
Please describe any AWOP enhancements that have been implemented in your program. One
example could include modifying status component criteria
N/A
Sustain
Please describe any activities that you implement to sustain your agency’s AWOP. Some examples
could include efforts to promote and incentivize AWOP (e.g., publish regular newsletter, awards
program, AWOP participation = higher ranking for grant/loan funding, etc.).
N/A
Lessons Learned:
Please list “lessons learned” that you feel would be helpful to other programs, e.g., how to build and
maintain internal support, how to integrate AWOP into your PWSS program, etc). If you are new to
AWOP, please list a question or concern you’d like to know more about.
Florida is still considered to be new to the program since movement within AWOP has been slow due to
reorganization, new leadership and time constraints implementing the program. Questions: 1) What
techniques have states found most effective to integrate AWOP into their PWSS program? 2) Florida is
always interested in AWOP training opportunities, what additional trainings or workshops held by EPA
and TSC with the other Region 4 states will help train staff at our primacy offices?
Attachment I: Optimization Goals Adopted by the NOLT
Category Goal Applies to Description
Microbial Minimum Data Monitoring Goal
Raw Water Turbidity
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Record maximum daily raw water turbidity.
Microbial
Individual Sedimentation Basin
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 2 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is > 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 1 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is ≤ 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Record individual sedimentation basin effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 4-hours or less if taking grab samples, or
15 minutes or less for continuous monitoring.
Microbial
Individual and Combined Filter
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Combined filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings. Optimization is based on the daily maximum values
recorded from all readings.
― Individual filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings (excluding 15-minute period following filter backwash).
Optimization is based on the daily maximum values recorded
from all readings.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
without filter-to-waste capability: Maximum individual filter
effluent turbidity following backwash ≤ 0.30 NTU and achieve ≤
0.10 NTU within 15 minutes.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
with filter-to-waste capability: Minimize individual filter effluent
turbidity during filter-to-waste period and record maximum
value. Return the filter to service at ≤ 0.10 NTU.
― Record individual and combined filter effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 1-minute or less for continuous
monitoring.
Microbial
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
― Record disinfectant residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations.
Disinfection By-
Product
Plant Effluent Disinfection
Byproducts (DBPs)
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―System Specific Targets: Could be a discrete value or range
that is based on a running annual average. Recommended goal
value/range should be 30% to 50% of long term LRAA goals (e.g.,
20-30 ppb for TTHM, 15-20 ppb for HAA5).
―Collect quarterly TTHM and HAA5 samples at the plant
effluent and distribution system compliance sites.
Disinfection By-
Product
Enhanced Coagulation
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet Stage 1 D/DBP Rule TOC removal requirements for
enhanced coagulation, which are based on source water
alkalinity and TOC levels, or an alternative compliance criterion,
as a running annual average (RAA) of the performance ratio
(actual TOC removal/required TOC removal) plus a factor of
safety of 10% (or performance ratio ≥ 1.1).
―Collect monthly total organic carbon samples for raw and
treated water (only applies to parent systems).
Disinfection By-
Product
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring Goal
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
―Record disinfection residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations (only applies to parent
systems).
Distribution
System
Disinfection Byproducts
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize any
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Individual Site Goal: Quarterly Maximum Locational Running
Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed 70/50 ppb.
―Long-Term System Goal: Average of Maximum Locational
Running Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed
60/40 ppb (the average of the last 8 quarters cannot exceed
60/40 ppb).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly DBP samples at all compliance locations; for
systems not in compliance, collect monthly samples.
Free Chlorine
Distribution
System
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize Free
Chlorine as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 0.20 mg/L free chlorine residual at all monitoring
sites in the distribution system, at all times.
―Monitoring should be performed at least monthly, but more
frequently at critical times (i.e., summer months).
―Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP
compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant
effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably
while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative
sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the
system, four sites total).
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Disinfection: Ammonia Control
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a detectable free ammonia residual in the plant
effluent ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
―Monitor free ammonia at least once per day in the plant
effluent.
• The monitoring frequency may be adjusted based on the variability observed over an extended period of time.
• Free ammonia may be monitored in the source water periodically (e.g., once per week) to assess variability.
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Operational Guideline
Chlorine and Ammonia Dosing
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a chlorine-to-nitrogen mass ratio between 4.5:1 and
5.0:1 (or chlorine-to-ammonia mass ratio between 3.7:1 and
4.1:1), which should result in a detectable free ammonia in the
plant effluent that is ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
Chloramine
Distribution
System
Disinfection: Monochloramine
and Nitrification-Related
Parameters
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 1.50 mg/L monochloramine residual at all
monitoring sites in the distribution system, at all times, to
provide a disinfection barrier against both microbial
contamination and nitrification prevention.
―Monitor monochloramine, free ammonia, and nitrite in the
distribution system and at the entry points (to establish a
baseline).
• Monochloramine and free ammonia should be monitored at all sample locations.
• Nitrite should be monitored at sample locations where monochloramine is ≤ 1.50 mg/L; nitrate may also be monitored, to further assess nitrification.
• Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the system, four sites total).
• Monitoring should be done at least monthly, but more frequently at critical times (e.g., summer months).
Distribution
System
Operational Guidelines
Tank Operations
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Contain
Storage
Tanks (any
secondary
disinfectant)
―Maintain an average turnover time < 5 days; or establish and
maintain a water turnover rate at each storage facility.
―Maintain good mixing (i.e., Performance Ratio ≥ 1) at all times;
for tanks where the PR cannot be calculated, adequate mixing
(i.e., uniform water quality) should be confirmed by alternate
means (e.g., tank profiling/water quality sampling).
Area Wide Optimization Program
Kentucky
Individual Program
Background Information
2021
Name of Agency:
Official Recognition of AWOP
Please provide the AWOP start date and describe any official recognition of AWOP in agency
newsletters, web pages, awards programs, annual meetings, etc.
The Kentucky AWOP began in 1998. Areas of recognition include AWOP certificate and award program
for microbial and DBP. Under normal circumstances, the certificates and awards are presented during
the annual Kentucky Water and Wastewater Operator Association (KWWOA) conference; however, due
to the COVID-19 pandemic they were mailed in 2020 and 2021 with some being hand-delivered in 2021.
Since presenting the awards at the conference was not an option the Agency did social media blasts
highlighting the systems and operators during Drinking Water Week. A blog post is published annually
highlighting the systems that received awards and certificates. The Kentucky Energy and Environment
Cabinet launched a new website in 2019 that includes an AWOP page (https://tinyurl.com/KYDWTA) and
the KY AWOP Story Map was launched in June 2020 (https://tinyurl.com/KYAWOP).
Official Adoption of AWOP Goals
Please describe when and how AWOP goals were adopted by your agency and communicated to the
water systems.
Microbial AWOP goals were adopted during the establishment of the program in 1998 and were
communicated to water systems over time through one-on-one site visits, sanitary surveys, and CPEs.
DBP AWOP goals were adopted in 2011 and updated in 2018. To disseminate the program information
to the water systems AWOP flyers were mailed, presentations were delivered at the annual KWWOA
conference, and one-on-one site visits were conducted.
National Optimization Goals adopted by your PWSS Program – Check all that apply:
(refer to Attachment I for descriptions of the NOLT optimization goals.)
Water Treatment Plants
Microbial (Turbidity): Raw Water____ Individual Settled_√___ CFE_√___ IFE_√___
Post BW w/FTW_√___ Post BW wo/FTW_√___ Disinfection (CT) _√___
DBPs (TTHM/HAA5): Plant Effluent_√___ Enhanced Coagulation_√___ Disinfection_√___
Chloramine Application: Ammonia Control_√___ Dosing (Chlorine & Ammonia) _√___
Distribution Systems
Individual Site DBPs _√___ Long Term System DBPs_√___ Tank Operations____
Secondary Disinfection, Free Chlorine _√___
Secondary Disinfection, Chloramines (monochloramine, Ammonia & Nitrite) __√__
Modifications to the national goals or other optimization goals utilized by your Agency:
Please describe any modified AWOP goals and/or any additional optimization goals adopted by your
agency and communicated to the water systems.
Although all water systems are tracked and ranked, only water systems that formally commit to the
program and adopt AWOP goals are eligible for AWOP certificates and awards.
Description of Current AWOP Team Members and Responsibilities
Please provide the name, position/title, description of AWOP duties and approximate FTE that each
team member spends on AWOP. Also indicate who serves as the AWOP team lead/point of contact.
Example: Nevel O. Meter, District Engineer, PBT trainer, ~ 0.3 FTE
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2017, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
16. AWOP Team Leader: Jackie Logsdon, Environmental Scientist V, DW Technical
Assistance & AWOP—Madisonville & Paducah Regional Offices, AWOP Coordinator,
~0.75 FTE
17. CJ Bailey, Environmental Scientist V, DW Technical Assistance & AWOP—Columbia
& Bowling Green Regional Offices, ~0.5 FTE
18. Gabe Tanner, Environmental Scientist IV, DW Technical Assistance & AWOP—
Louisville & Frankfort Regional Offices, ~0.5 FTE
19. David Messer, Environmental Scientist V, DW Technical Assistance & AWOP—Hazard
& London Regional Offices, ~0.5 FTE
20. Vacant, Environmental Scientist III, DW Technical Assistance & AWOP—Florence &
Morehead Regional Offices, ~0.5 FTE
21. Joe Uliasz, Environmental Control Supervisor, Drinking Water Compliance and
Technical Assistance Section Supervisor
Description of Former AWOP Team Members:
Please provide the name of former AWOP team members, and their reason for leaving the team. This
information is for historical purposes and also to support networking as AWOP continues to expand.
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2017, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
25. Roger Conn—Transfer within State Government
26. Tom Stern—Retirement
27. Jim Sproles—Retirement
28. Ed Fortner—Left State Government
29. Jim Hamon—Retirement
30. Noah Taylor—Transfer within Division
31. Linda Metts—Transfer within Section
32. Crystal Davis—Transfer within Branch
33. Julie Roney—Left State Government
34. Don DeKoster—Deceased
35. Russell Neal—Transfer within Division
36. Brian Chitti—Left KY State Government to work for OH State Government
37. Eric Sutton—Transfer within Section
38. Jenna Hammond—Left State Government
Inventory of State-Wide Treatment Facilities1 Number
Rapid rate filtration treatment plants2,3 134
Utilizing static settling without tubes or plates 16
Utilizing static settling with tubes or plates 57
Utilizing sludge blanket clarification (upflow, pulsator) 37
Utilizing contact adsorption clarification 5
Utilizing sludge recirculation (including ballasted clarification) 17
Utilizing DAF, or other alternative clarification process 3
Utilizing direct/in-line filtration 0
Utilizing packaged filtration (package plants) 0
Slow sand filter plants 1
Diatomaceous earth filter plants 0
Membrane treatment plants 9
Bag or cartridge filtration plants 0
Primary disinfectant
Free chlorine 144
Chloramines 0
Ozone 0
UV 0
Secondary disinfectant
Free chlorine 128
Chloramines 16
1Limited to surface water treatment plants (includes surface, GUDI, blended sources).
2All surface water treatment plants, except cartridge, membrane and slow sand.
3When a plant utilizes multiple treatment processes or configurations identified below, please
include them all in this inventory, e.g., a package plant that utilizes a CAC will be included as a rapid
rate plant using CAC and packaged filtration.
AWOP Vision:
Please describe the vision for your AWOP
The short-term vision for the KY AWOP is to ensure new personnel are adequately trained and CPE
certified, provide Targeted Technical Assistance (TTA) to water plant personnel to optimize TOC
removal, and continue to provide TTA to consecutive systems to optimize distribution systems. In the
long term, the intent is to maintain the high level of compliance with the Stage II DBPR that has been
achieved and return some focus back to optimization (both microbial and DBP) and AWOP integration
throughout other areas of the KY PWSS.
Status Component Implementation:
Please describe status component activities that are implemented in your agency, e.g., (are water
systems ranked according to public health risk and how is this information used; how is water system
data integrity ensured):
Each surface water treatment plant is tracked for all adopted turbidity goals and ranked according to
public health risk. This information is used to determine needed technical assistance (CPE, PBT, TTA,
etc.). To ensure data integrity, AWOP personnel and DOW inspectors have received data integrity
training provided by TSC. During sanitary surveys, routine inspections, TTA, CPE, site visits, etc., data
integrity may be evaluated.
Targeted Performance Improvement (TPI) Implementation:
Please list all activities that are implemented as TPI activities in your state, e.g., CPEs, PBT, Enhanced
Sanitary Surveys, technical assistance, other): CPE, PBT, TTA, DSO
AWOP Maintenance Component Implementation:
Integrate
Please check the following areas where AWOP has been integrated into the PWSS Program:
Plan Reviews_____ Permitting_____ Capacity Development_√____ Operator Training_√____
Technical Assistance_√____ DWSRF Prioritization_____ Enforcement_√____ Sanitary Surveys_√___
Other (identify)______________________________________________________
Enhance
Please describe any AWOP enhancements that have been implemented in your program. One
example could include modifying status component criteria
The Enforcement Targeting Tool (ETT) is used to identify systems that need technical assistance. This
helps with integrating AWOP into compliance and enforcement activities.
Sustain
Please describe any activities that you implement to sustain your agency’s AWOP. Some examples
could include efforts to promote and incentivize AWOP (e.g., publish regular newsletter, awards
program, AWOP participation = higher ranking for grant/loan funding, etc.).
Each year systems that have committed to AWOP and met all the goals receive a certificate and two
systems receive an award (award is based on three years of performance and compliance). Pre-
pandemic, the certificates and awards were presented during the KWWOA conference—the most
attended conference in KY by operators; mid-pandemic social media was used to highlight systems’
achievements; post-pandemic we plan to implement a combination of in-person presentation at the
conference and social media recognition. Soon after, an annual AWOP blog post is published
recognizing each system that received a certificate/award and includes details of the program.
Lessons Learned:
Please list “lessons learned” that you feel would be helpful to other programs, e.g., how to build and
maintain internal support, how to integrate AWOP into your PWSS program, etc). If you are new to
AWOP, please list a question or concern you’d like to know more about.
We found that integrating AWOP into the compliance and enforcement processes strengthened internal
support and improved compliance. Using the ETT score helps to put the focus on systems that are close
to experiencing compliance issues, are already out of compliance, have been referred to enforcement,
or are actively under an agreed order. AWOP tools, such as TTA, CPE, PBT, and Modular DSO Training,
are utilized for compliance assistance, particularly with DBPs. We have found that since systems need
the support and tools AWOP has to offer, the program becomes less “voluntary”.
Attachment I: Optimization Goals Adopted by the NOLT
Category Goal Applies to Description
Microbial Minimum Data Monitoring Goal
Raw Water Turbidity
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Record maximum daily raw water turbidity.
Microbial
Individual Sedimentation Basin
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 2 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is > 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 1 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is ≤ 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Record individual sedimentation basin effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 4-hours or less if taking grab samples, or
15 minutes or less for continuous monitoring.
Microbial
Individual and Combined Filter
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Combined filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings. Optimization is based on the daily maximum values
recorded from all readings.
― Individual filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings (excluding 15-minute period following filter backwash).
Optimization is based on the daily maximum values recorded
from all readings.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
without filter-to-waste capability: Maximum individual filter
effluent turbidity following backwash ≤ 0.30 NTU and achieve ≤
0.10 NTU within 15 minutes.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
with filter-to-waste capability: Minimize individual filter effluent
turbidity during filter-to-waste period and record maximum
value. Return the filter to service at ≤ 0.10 NTU.
― Record individual and combined filter effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 1-minute or less for continuous
monitoring.
Microbial
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
― Record disinfectant residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations.
Disinfection By-
Product
Plant Effluent Disinfection
Byproducts (DBPs)
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―System Specific Targets: Could be a discrete value or range
that is based on a running annual average. Recommended goal
value/range should be 30% to 50% of long term LRAA goals (e.g.,
20-30 ppb for TTHM, 15-20 ppb for HAA5).
―Collect quarterly TTHM and HAA5 samples at the plant
effluent and distribution system compliance sites.
Disinfection By-
Product
Enhanced Coagulation
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet Stage 1 D/DBP Rule TOC removal requirements for
enhanced coagulation, which are based on source water
alkalinity and TOC levels, or an alternative compliance criterion,
as a running annual average (RAA) of the performance ratio
(actual TOC removal/required TOC removal) plus a factor of
safety of 10% (or performance ratio ≥ 1.1).
―Collect monthly total organic carbon samples for raw and
treated water (only applies to parent systems).
Disinfection By-
Product
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring Goal
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
―Record disinfection residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations (only applies to parent
systems).
Distribution
System
Disinfection Byproducts
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize any
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Individual Site Goal: Quarterly Maximum Locational Running
Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed 70/50 ppb.
―Long-Term System Goal: Average of Maximum Locational
Running Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed
60/40 ppb (the average of the last 8 quarters cannot exceed
60/40 ppb).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly DBP samples at all compliance locations; for
systems not in compliance, collect monthly samples.
Free Chlorine
Distribution
System
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize Free
Chlorine as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 0.20 mg/L free chlorine residual at all monitoring
sites in the distribution system, at all times.
―Monitoring should be performed at least monthly, but more
frequently at critical times (i.e., summer months).
―Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP
compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant
effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably
while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative
sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the
system, four sites total).
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Disinfection: Ammonia Control
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a detectable free ammonia residual in the plant
effluent ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
―Monitor free ammonia at least once per day in the plant
effluent.
• The monitoring frequency may be adjusted based on the variability observed over an extended period of time.
• Free ammonia may be monitored in the source water periodically (e.g., once per week) to assess variability.
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Operational Guideline
Chlorine and Ammonia Dosing
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a chlorine-to-nitrogen mass ratio between 4.5:1 and
5.0:1 (or chlorine-to-ammonia mass ratio between 3.7:1 and
4.1:1), which should result in a detectable free ammonia in the
plant effluent that is ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
Chloramine
Distribution
System
Disinfection: Monochloramine
and Nitrification-Related
Parameters
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 1.50 mg/L monochloramine residual at all
monitoring sites in the distribution system, at all times, to
provide a disinfection barrier against both microbial
contamination and nitrification prevention.
―Monitor monochloramine, free ammonia, and nitrite in the
distribution system and at the entry points (to establish a
baseline).
• Monochloramine and free ammonia should be monitored at all sample locations.
• Nitrite should be monitored at sample locations where monochloramine is ≤ 1.50 mg/L; nitrate may also be monitored, to further assess nitrification.
• Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the system, four sites total).
• Monitoring should be done at least monthly, but more frequently at critical times (e.g., summer months).
Distribution
System
Operational Guidelines
Tank Operations
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Contain
Storage
Tanks (any
secondary
disinfectant)
―Maintain an average turnover time < 5 days; or establish and
maintain a water turnover rate at each storage facility.
―Maintain good mixing (i.e., Performance Ratio ≥ 1) at all times;
for tanks where the PR cannot be calculated, adequate mixing
(i.e., uniform water quality) should be confirmed by alternate
means (e.g., tank profiling/water quality sampling).
Area Wide Optimization Program
North Carolina
Individual Program
Background Information
2021
Name of Agency:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources / Public Water Supply Section
Official Recognition of AWOP
Please provide the AWOP start date and describe any official recognition of AWOP in agency
newsletters, web pages, awards programs, annual meetings, etc.
NC’s Program was started in late 1999. The Public Water Supply Section maintains a webpage
(http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/drinking-water/area-wide-optimization-
program) that describes AWOP and contains links to our annual report, spreadsheet tools, and
instructional videos. Microbial Turbidity Awards are presented annually to water treatment
plants that meet the microbial goals.
Official Adoption of AWOP Goals
Please describe when and how AWOP goals were adopted by your agency and communicated to the
water systems.
AWOP goals are discussed by the NC AWOP team and then further reviewed by Public Water
Supply Section management staff for formal adoption. Information about adopted goals can be
located on the NC AWOP webpage. The NC AWOP Team and Public Water Supply Section staff
discuss AWOP goals with water systems during sanitary surveys or site visits. Staff may also
periodically discuss AWOP activities at NCWOA regional section meetings. Microbial turbidity
goals for raw water, individual settled, CFE, and IFE were adopted at the start of program in late
1999. Distribution system disinfection byproducts goals for individual sampling sites and long-
term system goals were adopted in 2013.
National Optimization Goals adopted by your PWSS Program – Check all that apply:
(refer to Attachment I for descriptions of the NOLT optimization goals.)
Water Treatment Plants
Microbial (Turbidity): Raw Water_X_ Individual Settled_X__ CFE__X_ IFE__X_
Post BW w/FTW__X_ Post BW wo/FTW____ Disinfection (CT) __X_
DBPs (TTHM/HAA5): Plant Effluent____ Enhanced Coagulation____ Disinfection____
Chloramine Application: Ammonia Control____ Dosing (Chlorine & Ammonia) ____
Distribution Systems
Individual Site DBPs __X_ Long Term System DBPs__X_ Tank Operations____
Secondary Disinfection, Free Chlorine ____
Secondary Disinfection, Chloramines (monochloramine, Ammonia & Nitrite) ____
Modifications to the national goals or other optimization goals utilized by your Agency:
Please describe any modified AWOP goals and/or any additional optimization goals adopted by your
agency and communicated to the water systems.
NA
Description of Current AWOP Team Members and Responsibilities
Please provide the name, position/title, description of AWOP duties and approximate FTE that each
team member spends on AWOP. Also indicate who serves as the AWOP team lead/point of contact.
Example: Nevel O. Meter, District Engineer, PBT trainer, ~ 0.3 FTE
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2019, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
22. AWOP Team Leader: Eric Hudson P.E., Regional Engineer/Supervisor, ~ 0.20 FTE
23. Rebecca Sadosky PHD, Drinking Water Protection Program Coordinator, Security and Emergency Management Contact, Program Statistical Advisor, Past AWOP Team Leader, CPE Certified, ~ 0.05 FTE
24. Kimberly Barnett, Regional Engineer/Supervisor, Regional Technical Advisor, ~ 0.05 FTE 25. Mark Hahn, Environmental Senior Specialist, Regional Technical Adviser, DBP PBT
Facilitator Past AWOP Team Leader, CPE Certified, ~ 0.05 FTE 26. Turner Morrison, Environmental Engineer, Disinfection Byproducts Rule Manager, ~0.05
FTE 27. Clif Whitfield P.G., Engineering Associate, Regional Technical Advisor, DBP PBT
Facilitator, ~ 0.05 FTE 28. Brad Whitman, Environmental Engineer, Central Office Technical Advisor, ~0.05 FTE 29. Tommy Overby, Environmental Senior Specialist, Regional Technical Adviser, ~ 0.05 FTE 30. Meredith Guglielmi, Assistant Regional Engineer, Regional Technical Advisor, ~ 0.05 FTE 31. Emily Lester, Environmental Engineer, Surface Water Rule Manager, ~0.05 FTE 32. Nicole Hairston, Environmental Senior Specialist, Regional Technical Adviser, ~ 0.05 FTE
Description of Former AWOP Team Members:
Please provide the name of former AWOP team members, and their reason for leaving the team. This
information is for historical purposes and also to support networking as AWOP continues to expand.
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2019, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
39. Fred Hill, 1999 to 2008, Retirement 40. Ray McCall, 1999 to 2010, Retirement 41. Sandy O’Daniel, 1999 to 2006, Left State Service 42. Terry Gross, 2000 to 2002, Retirement 43. Jim Adams, 2000 to 2014, Retirement 44. Bobby Whisnant, 2002 to 2004, Left State Service 45. Jeff Bryan, 2002 to 2005, Transitioned to other job duties 46. Barry Aderton, 2003 to 2004, Left State Service 47. Brad Cole, 2004 to 2006, Left State Service 48. Lisa Edwards, 2006 to 2014, Filled another state position 49. David Tawes, 2006 to 2008, Left State Service 50. Mike Hicks, 2006 to 2007, Transitioned to other job duties 51. Clinton Cook, 2009 to 2014, Transitioned to other job duties 52. Steve Proctor, 2009 to 2014, Transitioned to other job duties 53. Forina Brown, 2013 to 2015, Left State Service
54. Chandler Warner, 2014 to 2014, Filled another state position 55. Julia Cavalier, 2006 to 2016, Transitioned to other job duties 56. Shawn Guyer, 2013 to 2016, Transitioned to other job duties 57. Keri Cantrell, 2014-2015, Left State Service 58. Paul Judge, 2014-2015, Left State Service - deceased 59. Tom Boyd, 2007-2017, Retirement 60. Andrew Jarman, 2014-2018, Transition to other job duties 61. Don Price, 2014 to 2019, Retirement 62. Tiffanie Hawley, 2016-2018, Left State Service 63. Lauren Plummer, 2018-2020, Filled another state position
Inventory of State-Wide Treatment Facilities1 Number
Rapid rate filtration treatment plants2,3 145
Utilizing static settling without tubes or plates 91
Utilizing static settling with tubes or plates 33
Utilizing sludge blanket clarification (upflow, pulsator) 24
Utilizing contact adsorption clarification 4
Utilizing sludge recirculation (including ballasted clarification) 1
Utilizing DAF, or other alternative clarification process 2
Utilizing direct/in-line filtration 2
Utilizing packaged filtration (package plants) 19
Slow sand filter plants 0
Diatomaceous earth filter plants 0
Membrane treatment plants 4
Bag or cartridge filtration plants 0
Primary disinfectant
Free chlorine 146
Chloramines 0
Ozone 3
UV 0
Secondary disinfectant
Free chlorine 107
Chloramines 42
1Limited to surface water treatment plants (includes surface, GUDI, blended sources).
2All surface water treatment plants, except cartridge, membrane and slow sand.
3When a plant utilizes multiple treatment processes or configurations identified below, please
include them all in this inventory, e.g., a package plant that utilizes a CAC will be included as a rapid
rate plant using CAC and packaged filtration.
AWOP Vision:
Please describe the vision for your AWOP
The NC AWOP Program provides technical assistance so water systems can improve and
optimize water quality. We have developed ranking tools to identify water systems that may
benefit from AWOP.
Status Component Implementation:
Please describe status component activities that are implemented in your agency, e.g., (are water
systems ranked according to public health risk and how is this information used; how is water system
data integrity ensured):
The PWS Section’s microbial and turbidity plant ranking scores were revised in 2014 to better
reflect which systems are struggling with violations and higher finished water turbidities.
Emphasis was placed on both violations and finished water turbidity, as these two parameters
most directly affect public health, and therefore are of greatest concern. For example, the
average monthly finished water turbidity for a system is multiplied by 100, while the average
settled turbidity is only multiplied by 3.16, giving the finished water turbidity more weight than
the settled water turbidity in the revised ranking scores. The lower the water plant’s ranking
score, the better their performance on turbidity and microbial indicators.
Disinfection byproducts present a significant challenge to water systems in North Carolina. The
NC AWOP bases its prioritization for DBPs on locational running annual averages (LRAA) of total
trihalomethanes (TTHM) and haloacetic acids (HAA5). DBP performance data is evaluated for
surface water and surface water purchase systems required to sample for DBPs.
Targeted Performance Improvement (TPI) Implementation:
Please list all activities that are implemented as TPI activities in your state, e.g., CPEs, PBT, Enhanced
Sanitary Surveys, technical assistance, other):
CPEs and Technical Assistance
AWOP Maintenance Component Implementation:
Integrate
Please check the following areas where AWOP has been integrated into the PWSS Program:
Plan Reviews_____ Permitting_____ Capacity Development_____ Operator Training__X__
Technical Assistance__X__ DWSRF Prioritization_____ Enforcement_____ Sanitary Surveys____
Other(identify)________________________________________________________
Enhance
Please describe any AWOP enhancements that have been implemented in your program. One
example could include modifying status component criteria
_______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sustain
Please describe any activities that you implement to sustain your agency’s AWOP. Some examples
could include efforts to promote and incentivize AWOP (e.g., publish regular newsletter, awards
program, AWOP participation = higher ranking for grant/loan funding, etc.).
In 2020, the NC AWOP had twelve staff participants from the PWS Section who worked to
sustain the program by participating in varying activities such as, evaluating system capabilities
and providing technical training to systems. The PWS Section issues annual certificates to
facilities that meet the AWOP optimization goals for settled and finished water turbidity. The
awards reflect the number of years that a plant has achieved optimized status and may also
include special recognition for plants that have received the award for 10 consecutive years or
more. In many communities, the achievement of the AWOP goals and certificate award has
been reported by the local media. The NC Department of Environmental Quality issues a press
release recognizing the water systems for winning the award and surpassing federal and state
drinking water standards. AWOP Team members and Public Water Supply staff often present
awards at NCWOA / NC AWWA-WEA events or local meetings with the water systems’
governing bodies. NC AWOP team members participate in EPA Region 4 AWOP meetings and
activities to further our knowledge, experience and understanding of the AWOP philosophies.
Funding has been made available for the purchasing of equipment and for traveling to meetings
or conducting optimization activities.
Lessons Learned:
Please list “lessons learned” that you feel would be helpful to other programs, e.g., how to build and
maintain internal support, how to integrate AWOP into your PWSS program, etc). If you are new to
AWOP, please list a question or concern you’d like to know more about.
It is important to quantify benefits and results of AWOP activities to be able to justify staff
involvement. Additionally, if plant personnel and management have not “bought in” to the
AWOP, then the benefits of the AWOP may not be fully realized.
Participating in a multi-state CPE is a great way to get AWOP experience. In addition, it
facilitates discussion with colleagues to share experiences on improving water treatment and
water quality.
Conducting special studies (e.g. hold studies, tank assessment, distribution mapping with
hydrant sampler) provide training opportunities for staff to gain experience using AWOP tools.
Providing a professionally printed and framed AWOP award instills pride and may motive
surrounding water systems to seek the award. Posting pictures of award presentations on
agency social media is a great way to build awareness.
Attachment I: Optimization Goals Adopted by the NOLT
Category Goal Applies to Description
Microbial Minimum Data Monitoring Goal
Raw Water Turbidity
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Record maximum daily raw water turbidity.
Microbial
Individual Sedimentation Basin
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 2 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is > 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 1 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is ≤ 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Record individual sedimentation basin effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 4-hours or less if taking grab samples, or
15 minutes or less for continuous monitoring.
Microbial
Individual and Combined Filter
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Combined filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings. Optimization is based on the daily maximum values
recorded from all readings.
― Individual filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings (excluding 15-minute period following filter backwash).
Optimization is based on the daily maximum values recorded
from all readings.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
without filter-to-waste capability: Maximum individual filter
effluent turbidity following backwash ≤ 0.30 NTU and achieve ≤
0.10 NTU within 15 minutes.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
with filter-to-waste capability: Minimize individual filter effluent
turbidity during filter-to-waste period and record maximum
value. Return the filter to service at ≤ 0.10 NTU.
― Record individual and combined filter effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 1-minute or less for continuous
monitoring.
Microbial
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
― Record disinfectant residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations.
Disinfection By-
Product
Plant Effluent Disinfection
Byproducts (DBPs)
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―System Specific Targets: Could be a discrete value or range
that is based on a running annual average. Recommended goal
value/range should be 30% to 50% of long term LRAA goals (e.g.,
20-30 ppb for TTHM, 15-20 ppb for HAA5).
―Collect quarterly TTHM and HAA5 samples at the plant
effluent and distribution system compliance sites.
Disinfection By-
Product
Enhanced Coagulation
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet Stage 1 D/DBP Rule TOC removal requirements for
enhanced coagulation, which are based on source water
alkalinity and TOC levels, or an alternative compliance criterion,
as a running annual average (RAA) of the performance ratio
(actual TOC removal/required TOC removal) plus a factor of
safety of 10% (or performance ratio ≥ 1.1).
―Collect monthly total organic carbon samples for raw and
treated water (only applies to parent systems).
Disinfection By-
Product
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring Goal
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
―Record disinfection residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations (only applies to parent
systems).
Distribution
System
Disinfection Byproducts
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize any
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Individual Site Goal: Quarterly Maximum Locational Running
Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed 70/50 ppb.
―Long-Term System Goal: Average of Maximum Locational
Running Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed
60/40 ppb (the average of the last 8 quarters cannot exceed
60/40 ppb).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly DBP samples at all compliance locations; for
systems not in compliance, collect monthly samples.
Free Chlorine
Distribution
System
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize Free
Chlorine as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 0.20 mg/L free chlorine residual at all monitoring
sites in the distribution system, at all times.
―Monitoring should be performed at least monthly, but more
frequently at critical times (i.e., summer months).
―Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP
compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant
effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably
while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative
sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the
system, four sites total).
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Disinfection: Ammonia Control
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a detectable free ammonia residual in the plant
effluent ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
―Monitor free ammonia at least once per day in the plant
effluent.
• The monitoring frequency may be adjusted based on the variability observed over an extended period of time.
• Free ammonia may be monitored in the source water periodically (e.g., once per week) to assess variability.
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Operational Guideline
Chlorine and Ammonia Dosing
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a chlorine-to-nitrogen mass ratio between 4.5:1 and
5.0:1 (or chlorine-to-ammonia mass ratio between 3.7:1 and
4.1:1), which should result in a detectable free ammonia in the
plant effluent that is ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
Chloramine
Distribution
System
Disinfection: Monochloramine
and Nitrification-Related
Parameters
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 1.50 mg/L monochloramine residual at all
monitoring sites in the distribution system, at all times, to
provide a disinfection barrier against both microbial
contamination and nitrification prevention.
―Monitor monochloramine, free ammonia, and nitrite in the
distribution system and at the entry points (to establish a
baseline).
• Monochloramine and free ammonia should be monitored at all sample locations.
• Nitrite should be monitored at sample locations where monochloramine is ≤ 1.50 mg/L; nitrate may also be monitored, to further assess nitrification.
• Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the system, four sites total).
• Monitoring should be done at least monthly, but more frequently at critical times (e.g., summer months).
Distribution
System
Operational Guidelines
Tank Operations
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Contain
Storage
Tanks (any
secondary
disinfectant)
―Maintain an average turnover time < 5 days; or establish and
maintain a water turnover rate at each storage facility.
―Maintain good mixing (i.e., Performance Ratio ≥ 1) at all times;
for tanks where the PR cannot be calculated, adequate mixing
(i.e., uniform water quality) should be confirmed by alternate
means (e.g., tank profiling/water quality sampling).
Area Wide Optimization Program
EPA Region 4
Individual Program
Background Information
2021
Name of Agency: EPA Region 4
Official Recognition of AWOP
Please provide the AWOP start date and describe any official recognition of AWOP in agency
newsletters, web pages, awards programs, annual meetings, etc.
EPA Region 4 established its Multi-State AWOP in 1998.
In 2001, the Region 4 AWOP received the inaugural “Innovations in Water Management Division
Award” for its role in ensuring safe drinking water.
In 2014, Region 4’s AWOP earned mention in the EPA Administrator’s blog upon being selected as a
“High Five Highlight” under the Agency’s “Aim High” Campaign for Protecting Water.
Official Adoption of AWOP Goals
Please describe when and how AWOP goals were adopted by your agency and communicated to the
water systems.
EPA’s microbial, DBP, and other distribution system goals are those established by the National
Optimization Leadership Team (NOLT) – comprised of EPA’s Drinking Water Technical Support Center,
EPA Regional Offices participating in AWOP (including Region 4), and ASDWA.
In 1998, EPA Region 4 communicated microbial AWOP goals by letter to the one (1) surface water
system for which the Region has direct regulatory jurisdiction. Applicable DBP and distribution goals
have been communicated to the system through presentations at meetings and through electronic
communication as these goals are developed and refined by NOLT.
National Optimization Goals adopted by your PWSS Program – Check all that apply:
(refer to Attachment I for descriptions of the NOLT optimization goals.)
Water Treatment Plants
Microbial (Turbidity): Raw Water__√__ Individual Settled_√___ CFE__√__ IFE__√__
Post BW w/FTW_√__ Post BW wo/FTW__√__ Disinfection (CT) __√__
DBPs (TTHM/HAA5): Plant Effluent__√__ Enhanced Coagulation__√__ Disinfection_ √__
Chloramine Application: Ammonia Control__√_ Dosing (Chlorine & Ammonia) __√__
Distribution Systems
Individual Site DBPs __√_ Long Term System DBPs__√__ Tank Operations__√__
Secondary Disinfection, Free Chlorine __√__
Secondary Disinfection, Chloramines (monochloramine, Ammonia & Nitrite) __√___
Modifications to the national goals or other optimization goals utilized by your Agency:
Please describe any modified AWOP goals and/or any additional optimization goals adopted by your
agency and communicated to the water systems.
N/A
Description of Current AWOP Team Members and Responsibilities
Please provide the name, position/title, description of AWOP duties and approximate FTE that each
team member spends on AWOP. Also indicate who serves as the AWOP team lead/point of contact.
Example: Nevel O. Meter, District Engineer, PBT trainer, ~ 0.3 FTE
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2019, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
33. AWOP Team Leader: Janine Morris, Environmental Engineer (~ 0.1 FTE)
34. Robert Burns, Environmental Engineer (~ 0.1 FTE)
35. Dale Froneberger, Environmental Scientist (~ 0.1 FTE)
36. Dominique Smith, Life Scientist (~ 0.1 FTE)
37. Emma Inhorn, Environmental Engineer (~ 0.1 FTE)
38. Ashley Aspinwall-Barron, Life Scientist (~ 0.1 FTE)
Description of Former AWOP Team Members:
Please provide the name of former AWOP team members, and their reason for leaving the team. This
information is for historical purposes and also to support networking as AWOP continues to expand.
(Note that if you submitted this information in 2017, that information is being provided and if there are
no changes, simply indicate “no change” in this section.)
64. Vivian Doyle – Transferred from Drinking Water Program
65. David Parker – Promoted to Management Position
66. Pamela Riley – Workload Constraints
67. Brian Smith – Promoted to Management Position
68. Renea Hall - Workload Constraints
Inventory of State-Wide Treatment Facilities1 Number
Rapid rate filtration treatment plants2,3 1
Utilizing static settling without tubes or plates 0
Utilizing static settling with tubes or plates 1
Utilizing sludge blanket clarification (upflow, pulsator) 0
Utilizing contact adsorption clarification 1
Utilizing sludge recirculation (including ballasted clarification) 0
Utilizing DAF, or other alternative clarification process 0
Utilizing direct/in-line filtration 0
Utilizing packaged filtration (package plants) 1
Slow sand filter plants 0
Diatomaceous earth filter plants 0
Membrane treatment plants 0
Bag or cartridge filtration plants 0
Primary disinfectant
Free chlorine 0
Chloramines 0
Ozone 0
UV 1
Secondary disinfectant
Free chlorine 1
Chloramines 0
1Limited to surface water treatment plants (includes surface, GUDI, blended sources).
2All surface water treatment plants, except cartridge, membrane and slow sand.
3When a plant utilizes multiple treatment processes or configurations identified below, please
include them all in this inventory, e.g., a package plant that utilizes a CAC will be included as a rapid
rate plant using CAC and packaged filtration.
AWOP Vision:
Please describe the vision for your AWOP
Short-Term Vision: Achieve and document progress in reducing DBP non-compliance and progress in
meeting microbial optimization goals among water systems in Region 4 through the application of
AWOP tools.
Long-Term Vision: Sustain and expand Region 4’s AWOP network by ensuring that the program
continues to succeed in helping meet the public health protection and drinking water quality needs of
water systems, states, and EPA.
Status Component Implementation:
Please describe status component activities that are implemented in your agency, e.g., (are water
systems ranked according to public health risk and how is this information used; how is water system
data integrity ensured):
Region 4 has only one (1) surface water system under its direct regulatory jurisdiction, and it tracks the
performance of this system with respect to microbial and DBP optimization goals.
Targeted Performance Improvement (TPI) Implementation:
Please list all activities that are implemented as TPI activities in your state, e.g., CPEs, PBT, Enhanced
Sanitary Surveys, technical assistance, other):
Region 4 has applied numerous TPI tools to the one surface water system under its direct regulatory
jurisdiction, including: (1) microbial CPE; (2) microbial PBT; (3) and targeted technical assistance in
areas such as filter profiling, Enhanced Terminal Subfluidization Wash (ETSW), chlorine mapping for
design of a unidirectional flushing program, and data integrity.
Region 4’s AWOP Team places top priority on its role in facilitating Multi-State Planning Meetings,
participating in National Optimization Leadership Team (NOLT) meetings, and building awareness of the
program. Building awareness is typically carried out by preparing and transmitting congratulatory letters
(at the request of a state) to water system meeting a state’s optimization goals, by delivering remarks
about the program at water system AWOP award ceremonies hosted by states, and by delivering AWOP-
related presentations at drinking program meetings and workshops attended by EPA and states.
AWOP Maintenance Component Implementation:
Integrate
Please check the following areas where AWOP has been integrated into the PWSS Program:
Plan Reviews_____ Permitting_____ Capacity Development__√___ Operator Training__√___
Technical Assistance__√___ DWSRF Prioritization_____ Enforcement_____ Sanitary Surveys____
Other(identify)________________________________________________________
Enhance
Please describe any AWOP enhancements that have been implemented in your program. One example
could include modifying status component criteria
N/A
Sustain
Please describe any activities that you implement to sustain your agency’s AWOP. Some examples
could include efforts to promote and incentivize AWOP (e.g., publish regular newsletter, awards
program, AWOP participation = higher ranking for grant/loan funding, etc.).
Region 4 strives to identify and communicate connections between AWOP and statutorily- and
regulatory-driven elements of the drinking water program and other EPA strategic priorities, so that
states – and in turn water systems – will maintain strong incentive for fulfilling their role in the
National AWOP Network.
Lessons Learned:
Please list “lessons learned” that you feel would be helpful to other programs, e.g., how to build and
maintain internal support, how to integrate AWOP into your PWSS program, etc). If you are new to
AWOP, please list a question or concern you’d like to know more about.
There is significant variability in the way that Region 4 and AWOP states report water systems as
meeting DBP optimization goals for a given year, which translates to challenges in compiling consistent
and meaningful Region-wide performance summary data for this component of the program.
Region 4 and its states continue to prepare to conduct Multi-State AWOP meetings and events via virtual
platforms. Experiences show that while not ideal, available platforms can be effective for applying some
AWOP tools, facilitating meetings, and maintaining overall continuity of program operations during a
prolonged period of restrictions on travel and in-person gatherings. Regional AWOP meetings held
during 2020 and 2021 have included discussions of ways to incorporate virtual platforms into future post-
pandemic meetings to increase accessibility and inclusion.
Attachment I: Optimization Goals Adopted by the NOLT
Category Goal Applies to Description
Microbial Minimum Data Monitoring Goal
Raw Water Turbidity
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Record maximum daily raw water turbidity.
Microbial
Individual Sedimentation Basin
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 2 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is > 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Settled water turbidity ≤ 1 NTU in 95% of readings when the
annual average raw turbidity is ≤ 10 NTU. Optimization is based
on the daily maximum values recorded from all readings.
― Record individual sedimentation basin effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 4-hours or less if taking grab samples, or
15 minutes or less for continuous monitoring.
Microbial
Individual and Combined Filter
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
― Combined filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings. Optimization is based on the daily maximum values
recorded from all readings.
― Individual filter effluent turbidity ≤ 0.10 NTU in 95% of
readings (excluding 15-minute period following filter backwash).
Optimization is based on the daily maximum values recorded
from all readings.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
without filter-to-waste capability: Maximum individual filter
effluent turbidity following backwash ≤ 0.30 NTU and achieve ≤
0.10 NTU within 15 minutes.
―Post backwash individual filter effluent turbidity for filters
with filter-to-waste capability: Minimize individual filter effluent
turbidity during filter-to-waste period and record maximum
value. Return the filter to service at ≤ 0.10 NTU.
― Record individual and combined filter effluent turbidity
readings at intervals of 1-minute or less for continuous
monitoring.
Microbial
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Rapid Rate
Filtration
Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
― Record disinfectant residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations.
Disinfection By-
Product
Plant Effluent Disinfection
Byproducts (DBPs)
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―System Specific Targets: Could be a discrete value or range
that is based on a running annual average. Recommended goal
value/range should be 30% to 50% of long term LRAA goals (e.g.,
20-30 ppb for TTHM, 15-20 ppb for HAA5).
―Collect quarterly TTHM and HAA5 samples at the plant
effluent and distribution system compliance sites.
Disinfection By-
Product
Enhanced Coagulation
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet Stage 1 D/DBP Rule TOC removal requirements for
enhanced coagulation, which are based on source water
alkalinity and TOC levels, or an alternative compliance criterion,
as a running annual average (RAA) of the performance ratio
(actual TOC removal/required TOC removal) plus a factor of
safety of 10% (or performance ratio ≥ 1.1).
―Collect monthly total organic carbon samples for raw and
treated water (only applies to parent systems).
Disinfection By-
Product
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring Goal
Surface
Water and
Groundwater
Under the
Direct
Influence of
Surface
Water Plants
―Meet CT requirements to achieve inactivation of Giardia and
viruses plus a system-specific factor of safety.
―Record disinfection residual, temperature, and pH at
maximum daily flow for CT calculations (only applies to parent
systems).
Distribution
System
Disinfection Byproducts
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize any
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Individual Site Goal: Quarterly Maximum Locational Running
Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed 70/50 ppb.
―Long-Term System Goal: Average of Maximum Locational
Running Annual Average TTHM/HAA5 values not to exceed
60/40 ppb (the average of the last 8 quarters cannot exceed
60/40 ppb).
―For systems in compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs,
collect quarterly DBP samples at all compliance locations; for
systems not in compliance, collect monthly samples.
Free Chlorine
Distribution
System
Disinfection
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize Free
Chlorine as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 0.20 mg/L free chlorine residual at all monitoring
sites in the distribution system, at all times.
―Monitoring should be performed at least monthly, but more
frequently at critical times (i.e., summer months).
―Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP
compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant
effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably
while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative
sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the
system, four sites total).
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Disinfection: Ammonia Control
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a detectable free ammonia residual in the plant
effluent ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
―Monitor free ammonia at least once per day in the plant
effluent.
• The monitoring frequency may be adjusted based on the variability observed over an extended period of time.
• Free ammonia may be monitored in the source water periodically (e.g., once per week) to assess variability.
Plants that
Utilize
Chloramine
Operational Guideline
Chlorine and Ammonia Dosing
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain a chlorine-to-nitrogen mass ratio between 4.5:1 and
5.0:1 (or chlorine-to-ammonia mass ratio between 3.7:1 and
4.1:1), which should result in a detectable free ammonia in the
plant effluent that is ≤ 0.10 mg/L as NH3-N.
Chloramine
Distribution
System
Disinfection: Monochloramine
and Nitrification-Related
Parameters
Performance and Monitoring
Goals
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Utilize
Chloramine
as a
Secondary
Disinfectant
―Maintain ≥ 1.50 mg/L monochloramine residual at all
monitoring sites in the distribution system, at all times, to
provide a disinfection barrier against both microbial
contamination and nitrification prevention.
―Monitor monochloramine, free ammonia, and nitrite in the
distribution system and at the entry points (to establish a
baseline).
• Monochloramine and free ammonia should be monitored at all sample locations.
• Nitrite should be monitored at sample locations where monochloramine is ≤ 1.50 mg/L; nitrate may also be monitored, to further assess nitrification.
• Sample locations should include bacteriological and DBP compliance sites, all distribution system entry points (e.g., plant effluent, consecutive system connections), all tanks (preferably while draining), and identified critical sites base on investigative sampling (minimum of one critical site in each quadrant of the system, four sites total).
• Monitoring should be done at least monthly, but more frequently at critical times (e.g., summer months).
Distribution
System
Operational Guidelines
Tank Operations
Parent and
Consecutive
Water
Systems that
Contain
Storage
Tanks (any
secondary
disinfectant)
―Maintain an average turnover time < 5 days; or establish and
maintain a water turnover rate at each storage facility.
―Maintain good mixing (i.e., Performance Ratio ≥ 1) at all times;
for tanks where the PR cannot be calculated, adequate mixing
(i.e., uniform water quality) should be confirmed by alternate
means (e.g., tank profiling/water quality sampling).