Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary Material
Highly efficient and selective removal of mercury ions
using hyperbranched polyethylenimine functionalized
carboxymethyl chitosan composite adsorbent
Hehua Zeng a, b, d, Lan Wang a*, Dan Zhang a, c, Peng Yan a, Jing Nie a,
Virender K. Sharma e*, Chuanyi Wang a, c*
a Laboratory of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics &
Chemistry; Key Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Special Environments,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, P.R. China
b The Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100049, China
c School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and
Technology, Xian 710021, P.R. China
d Department of Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, Changji University, Changji 831100, P.R.
China
e Program for the Environment and Sustainability, Department of Environment and Sustainability,
School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 212 Adriance Lab Rod. College Station Texas
77843, USA
*Corresponding authors. Phone: +86-991-383-5879
Email addresses: [email protected]; [email protected]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and characterization
Carboxymethyl chitosan (CCTS, the degree of substitution was not less than
80%, and the average molecular weight was 9000 g/mol) was purchased from
Zhejiang Golden-Shell Biochemical Co. Ltd., Zhejiang, China). Polyethylenimine
[PEI, Mw = 70000 Da, 50wt % aqueous solution, branched polymer (–
NHCH2CH2–)x[–N(CH2CH2NH2)–CH2CH2–]y], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, analytical
grade, the degree of hydrolysis was 99% and the average degree of polymerization
was 1700) and glutaraldehyde (GLA) with a concentration of 50% were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich Company. The stock solution of metal ions was prepared from
mercury acetate (CH3COO)2Hg), cadmium acetate (CH3COO)2Cd), lead acetate
trihydrate (CH3COO)2Pb∙3H2O) and copper acetate monohydrate (CH3COO)2Cu∙H2O)
(Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in ultrapure water.
All of the other reagents were of analytical purity and used without further
purification.
FTIR spectra were detected by a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer
(Nicolet iS50, Thermo, USA), using the KBr pellet method and scanning the range
between 400 and 4000 cm-1. Morphological measurements were recorded by a field-
emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU8020, Hitachi). The X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out on a
multifunctional X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (PHI-5702, Perkin Elmer, USA)
with Al Ka radiation as the excitation source (14 kV). The specific surface area, total
pore volume, and pore size distribution were calculated by the Brunauer-Emmert-
Teller (BET) equation and the BJH method, respectively. Thermal gravimetry (TG)
was determined with STA 449F3 thermal gravity analyzer (Netzsch, Germany), each
sample was run from 30 to 1000 ºC at a scanning rate of 10 ºC/min under nitrogen
atmosphere.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
2.3. Adsorption studies
The adsorption capacity Qe (mg/g) of HPFC toward metal ions at equilibrium
was calculated as following Eq. (1):
Qe=(C0−C e)×V
m (1)
And the adsorption efficiency (E) was calculated using the Eq. (2):
E¿(C0−C e)
C 0×100 % (2)
where C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations (mg/L) of metal ions in
solution, respectively. V (L) is the volume of solution and m (g) is the mass of HPFC.
2.4. Computational details
All the geometric structures, adsorption energies were carried out on the basis of
DMol3 code [1, 2]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [3] with the
Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional [4] and all-electron double numerical
basis set with polarized function (DNP) have been employed. The real-space global
orbital cutoff radius is chosen to be as high as 5.1Å, the convergence tolerance of
energy is 1.0x10-5 Ha (1Ha=27.21eV), and that of maximum force is 2.0x10-3 Ha/Å.
Each atom in the storage models is allowed to relax to the minimum in the enthalpy
without any constraints. Corrugation effects are tested and the results show that all the
atoms are coplanar with each other. The metals Cu, Cd, Hg, and Pb were absorbed
into the model. The adsorption energy (Ead) was calculated according to the following
Eq. (3):
Ead = EA + EB – EA-B (3)
where A represents the selected model; B represents the heavy metal ions.
2.5. Desorption and regeneration
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
Desorption and regeneration experiment was carried out in 20 mL of 798.1 mg/L
Hg(II) ions solution at pH 5.5 with 20 mg of HPFC at 30 ºC for 360 min. After
filtration, the Hg(II)-loaded adsorbent was first dispersed into 20 mL of 2 mol/L
HNO3 solution (or 20 mL of 2 mol/L KCl solution) and shaken at 30 ºC for 360 min,
then neutralized in a diluted NaOH solution. Next, the HPFC was filtered and washed
with ultrapure water several times. After freeze-drying, the adsorbent was reused in
the next cycle.
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Optimization of synthesis conditions
Fig. S1. Influences of synthetic conditions of (a) the impact of the PEI dosage on the N content of
HPFC; (b) the impact of the GLA (5.0%) dosage on the yield of HPFC.
Fig. S2. Effect of PEI amount on Hg(II) ions adsorption.
Except for the investigated parameter, others fixed at C0 = 1596.2 mg/L, pH = 5.5,
sample dosage = 20 mg/20 mL, temperature = 30 ºC, adsorption time = 360 min.
Table S1
The relationship between the N content of the as-products and the adsorption capacity of Hg(II)
ions.
N (mmol/g) 5.65 7.59 8.97 8.89
Hg (mmol/g) 5.20 7.05 7.89 7.90
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
3.2. Morphology and structural characteristics
Fig. S3. (a) SEM image of HPFC after Hg(II) adsorption; (b) EDS spectra of Hg(II) loaded HPFC.
Table S2
Surface areas, pore volumes and pore sizes of CCTS and HPFC.
Sample BET surface area (m2/g) pore volume (cm3/g) pore size (nm)
CCTS 1.01 0.0013 106.2
HPFC 22.26 0.0806 11.9
3.3. Adsorption kinetics
Pseudo-first-order model:
Qt=Qf (1−e−k1 t) (4)
Pseudo-second-order model:
tQt
= 1k2Q f
2 +1
Q ft (5)
Intraparticle diffusion model
Qt=k∫ ¿t1 /2+θ¿ (6)
Where k1 (1/min) and k2 [g/(mg·min)] are the rate constants for first-order and
second-order models, respectively; kint [mg/(g·min1/2)] is a constant related to the
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
diffusion coefficient in intraparticle diffusion model; θ is the intercept for the
intraparticle diffusion model; Qf is the fitted adsorption value (mg/g) at equilibrium,
and Qt is the experimental value (mg/g) at set time t (min), respectively.
The removal performance of HPFC in the real water sample
The real water sample was taken from a gas field (China), and the main
components are listed in Table S3). Then dried HPFC (20 mg) was immersed into 20
mL of above solution and stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Then the adsorbent
was filtered out and the concentration of the solution was measured by AFFS. The
HPFC could decrease the Hg(II) ions concentration to 0.15 mg/L with a high removal
efficiency of 98.2%. The result suggests that the HPFC has good potential in real
applications.
Table S3
The main components of the real water sample.
Component Hg Na Mg Ca Cl- NO3- SO4
2- HCO3-
C (mg/L) 8.44 9426 685 1624 14574 155 68 201
3.4. Absorption thermodynamics
KC=C Ae
C e
(7)
∆ Go=−RTln KC (8)
lnK C=∆ So
R−∆ Ho
RT(9)
Where KC is distribution coefficient, CAe is the amount of Hg(II) ions adsorbed on
HPFC (mg/L), R is the gas constant (8.314 J / (mol·K)), T is the temperature (K).
3.5. Adsorption isotherms
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
Langmuir model
Qe=Qm bLC e
1+bL Ce
(10)
Freundlich model
Qe=K F C e1 /n F
(11)
Langmuir- Freundlich model
Qe=Qm bLF C e
1 /nLF
1+bLF C e1/nLF
(12)
Where Qm is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), Ce is the final equilibrium
mercury concentration (mg/L), bL is the Langmuir constant (L/mg) related to the
adsorption strength. KF is the Freundlich constant related to the adsorption strength
(mg/g) (L/mg), bLF is the Langmuir-Freundlich constant related to the adsorption
strength (L/mg), nF and nLF are the Freundlich and Langmuir-Freundlich constants
related to the adsorption capacity, respectively. Langmuir isotherm describes a
monolayer adsorption which takes place at homogeneous sites within the adsorbent
where all the adsorption sites are energetically identical. Freundlich isotherm
expresses adsorption at multilayer and on the energetically heterogeneous surface and
active sites. Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm suggests that the adsorption of an
adsorbent toward a target is the synergistic effects of the monolayer adsorption and
the multilayer adsorption.
3.8.1. XPS analysis
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
Fig. S4. XPS spectra: high-resolution spectra of Pb 4f (a), Cu 2p (b) and Cd 3d (c), (d) survey
spectra after mixed ions adsorption on HPFC.
3.8.3. DFT analysis
Fig. S5. The optimized DFT structures of PEI-GLA-double CCTS monomer.
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
(The H, C, N, and O are depicted by white, grey, blue, and red color, respectively).
Fig. S6. HOMO and LUMO plots of PEI-GLA-double CCTS monomer.
References
[1] B. Delley, An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for
polyatomic molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 508–517.
[2] B. Delley, From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach, J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2000)
7756–7764.
[3] R.G. Parr, W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, Oxford University
Press 1989 127–136.
[4] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868.
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179