ArticlesSonia Gandhi and Congress Secret Billions Exposed

7/28/2019 ArticlesSonia Gandhi and Congress Secret Billions Exposed

1/35

Articles

Sonia Gandhi and Congress SecretBillions Exposed inShare

Share

What was Rajiv Gandhis fatal error in politics? It does not need a seer to say that it was hisclaim to honestybranding himself as Mr Clean that proved fatal to him. IndiraGandhi was his contrast. Asked about corruption in her government, she said nonchalantly, itwas a global phenomenon. This was in 1983. An honest Delhi High Court judge evenlamented how could corruption be controlled when someone holding such a high position had

almost rationalised it. The result, no one could ever charge Indira Gandhi with corruption,because she never claimed to be clean. But, ambitious to look ideal, Rajiv proclaimedhonesty and so provoked scrutiny; in contrast, Indira, opting to be practical, immunisedherself against scrutiny. Eventually, Rajivs claim to honesty became the very cross on whichhe was crucified in the 1989 elections when the Bofors gun shot the Congress out of power.The lesson to the political class was: dont claim to be honest, if you really are not so. Thehard lesson seems forgotten now by the Gandhi family itself. Sonia Gandhi, instead offollowing Indiras safe path, is wrongly caught on Rajivs risky steps. The consequencesseem to be ominous. Will the politics of 1987 to 1989 repeat?

Following Rajiv and forgetting Indira, Sonia Gandhi proclaimed zero tolerance to

corruption at a party rally in Allahabad in November 2010. She repeated it at the Congressplenary in Delhi weeks later. Asking the cadre to take the corrupt head on, she said that her
http://allstyling.ru/http://allstyling.ru/http://joomla-master.org/http://joomla-master.org/http://www.smilyo.com/corruption-in-politics/sonia-gandhi-and-congress-secret-billions-exposedhttp://www.smilyo.com/corruption-in-politics/sonia-gandhi-and-congress-secret-billions-exposedhttp://www.smilyo.com/corruption-in-politics/sonia-gandhi-and-congress-secret-billions-exposedhttp://joomla-master.org/http://allstyling.ru/


2/35

party was prompt in acting againstthe corrupt; never spared the corrupt becausecorruption impedes development. This was almost how Rajiv Gandhi spoke in the Congresscentenary in Mumbai 25 years ago. Two crucial differences marked Rajiv away from Sonia.First, when Rajiv claimed to be Mr Clean, he had no scams to defend against. But, Soniaclaims to be honest amidst huge and continuing scamsCWG, Adarsh, 2G Spectrum

allocation scam. Next, Rajiv had a clean slate to begin with, with no known skeletons inhis cupboard till the Bofors scam smashed his Mr Clean image. In contrast, Sonias slate isfull of credible exposures of bribes and pay-offs in billions of dollars secreted in Swiss bankaccounts, not counting Quattrocchis millions from Bofors. To make it worse, for almost twodecades now, she has not dared to deny the exposures or sue the famous Swiss magazine orthe Russian investigative journalist who had put out evidence of bribe against the Soniafamily. Seen against this background, Sonias vow to act against the corrupt seems like asuspect hooting catch the thief and scooting away. This is the main story that unfolds here.

$2.2 billions to 11 billions!

A stunning exposure on Sonia Gandhis secret billions in Swiss banks came, surprisingly,from Switzerland itself, where the worlds corrupt stash away their booty. In its issue of

November 19, 1991, Schweizer Illustrierte, the most popular magazine of Switzerland, did anexpos of over a dozen politicians of the third world, including Rajiv Gandhi, who hadstashed away their bribe monies in Swiss banks. Schweizer Illustrierte, not a rag, sells some2,15,000 copies and has a readership of 9,17,000almost a sixth of Swiss adult population.Citing the newly opened KGB records, the magazine reported that Sonia Gandhi the widowof the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was controlling secret account with 2.5 billionSwiss Francs (equal to $2.2 billion) in her minor sons name. The $2.2 billion account must

have existed from before June 1988 when Rahul Gandhi attained majority. The loot intodays rupee value equals almost Rs 10,000 crore. Swiss banks invest and multiply theclients monies, not keep them buried. Had it been invested in safe long-term securities, the$.2.2 billion bribe would have multiplied to $9.41 billion (Rs 42,345 crore) by 2009. If it had

been put in US stocks, it would have swelled to $12.97 billion (Rs 58,365 crore). If, as mostlikely, it were invested in long-term bonds and stocks as 50:50, it would have grown to$11.19 billion (Rs 50,355 crore). Before the global financial meltdown in 2008, the $2.2

billion bribes in stocks would have peaked at $18.66 billion (Rs 83,900 crore). By anycalculation the present size of the $2.2 billion secret funds of the family in Swiss banks seemshugeanywhere between Rs 43,000 plus to some Rs 84,000 crore!

KGB papers

The second expos, emanating from the archives of the Russian spy outfit KGB, is far moreserious. It says that the Gandhi family has accepted political pay-offs from the KGBaclear case of treason besides bribe. In her book The State Within a State: The KGB and itsHold on Russia-Past, Present, and Future, Yevgenia Albats, an acclaimed investigative

journalist, says: A letter signed by Victor Chebrikov, who replaced Andropov as the KGBhead in 1982 noted: the USSR KGB maintains contact with the son of the Premier MinisterRajiv Gandhi (of India). R Gandhi expresses deep gratitude for the benefits accruing to the

Prime Ministers family from the commercial dealings of the firm he controls in co-operationwith the Soviet foreign trade organisations. R Gandhi reports confidentially that a substantial


3/35

portion of the funds obtained through this channel are used to support the party of RGandhi. (p.223). Albats has also disclosed that, in December 2005, KGB chief VictorChebrikov had asked for authorisation from the Central Committee of the Communist Partyof the Soviet Union, to make payments in US dollars to the family members of RajivGandhi, namely Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi.

And even before Albats book came out the Russian media had leaked out the details of thepay-offs. Based on the leaks, on July 4, 1992, The Hindu had reported: the Russian ForeignIntelligence Service admits the possibility that the KGB could have been involved inarranging profitable Soviet contract for the company controlled by Rajiv Gandhi family.

Indian media

Rajiv Gandhis sad demise delayed the Swiss and Russian expos on Sonia being picked uphere. But Indian medias interest in it actually coincided with Sonia Gandhi assuming

leadership of the Congress. A G Noorani, a well-known columnist, had reported on bothSchweizer Illustrierte and Albats exposs in Statesman (December 31, 1988). SubramanianSwamy had put out the photocopies of the pages of Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats book inhis website along with the mail of the Swiss magazine dated February 23, 2002 confirmingthat in its article of November 1991 it had named Rajiv Gandhi with a total of Swiss Franc2.5 billion ($2.2 billion) in secret account; it had also offered to supply a original copy of themagazine to Swamy. (See:http://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.html ) These factswere again recalled in my article in The New Indian Express (April 29, 2009) written inresponse to Sonia Gandhi speech at Mangalore (April 27, 2009) declaring that, the Congresswas taking steps to address the issue of untaxed Indian money in Swiss banks. The articlehad questioned her about her familys corrupt wealth in Swiss banks in the context of her

vow to bring back the monies stashed away abroad. Rajinder Puri, a reputed journalist, hasalso earlier written on the KGB disclosures in his column on August 15, 2006. Recently, inIndia Today (December 27, 2010) the redoubtable Ram Jethmalani has referred to the Swissexpos, asking where is that money now? So the Indian media too has repeatedly publishedthe details of the secret billions of the Gandhi family investigated by the Swiss and Russian

journalists. Amal Datta (CPI(M)) had raised the $2.2 billion issue in Parliament on December7, 1991, but Speaker Shivraj Patil expunged the Gandhi name from the proceedings!

Self-incriminating

But, what has been the response of Sonia or Rahul, major after June 1988, to the investigationby Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats and to the Indian medias repeated references to theirinvestigation? It can be summed up in one word: Silence. Thus, apart from the exposs, thedeafening silence of the Gandhis itself constitutes the most damaging and self-incriminatingevidence of the familys guilt. When Schweizer Illustrierte alleged that Sonia had held RajivGandhis bribes in Rahuls name in Swiss banks, neither she northe son, protested, or suedthe magazine, then or later; nor did they sue A G Noorani or Statesman when they repeated itin 1998, or later; nor would they sue Subramanian Swamy when he put it on his website in2002; neither did they sue me, or the Express when the article was carried in April 2009.When major papers, The Hindu and The Times of India included, had carried the expose on

KGB payments in the year 1992 itself adding that the Russian government was embarrassedby the disclosures, neither of the Gandhis challenged or sued them; nor did they sue Yevgenia
http://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.htmlhttp://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.htmlhttp://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.htmlhttp://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.html


4/35

Albats when she wrote about KGB payments to Rajiv Gandhi in 1994. Neither did they actagainst Swamy when he put Albats book pages on his website or when Rajinder Puri, awell-known journalist, wrote about it in his column on August 15, 2006. However, a feeble

but proxy suit was filed by Sonia loyalists to defend her reputation when Albats expos wasmade part of the full-page advertisement in The New York Times in 2007 issued by some

NRIs to unmask Sonia to the US audience, as they claimed. The suit was promptlydismissed by a US court because Sonia herself did not dare file the suit. Shockingly even thatsuit did not challenge the $2.2 billion Swiss account at all!

Imagine that the report in Schweizer Illustrierte or in Albats book was false and Sonia Gandhidid not have those billions in secret accounts in Rahul Gandhis name or the family was not

paid for its service to the KGB as alleged. How would they, as honest and outraged people,have reacted? Like how Morarji Desai, then retired and old at 87, responded in anger when,Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist, had mentioned in his book

that Morarji Desai was a paid CIA mole in the Indian Cabinet. Morarji Desai forthwith fileda libel suit. Commenting in The American Spectator, Rael Jean Isaac wrote in 2004, fiveyears after Morarji Desai had passed away, that Hersh habitually indulged in characterassassination; and in his attempt to do down Henry Kissinger, Morarji Desai became thevictim. Isaac added that Desai, 87, calling it a sheer mad story, reacted in outrage with alibel suit seeking $50 million in damages. When the suit came up, as Desai, 93, was too ill totravel to US, Kissinger testified on Desaisbehalf, flatly contradicted Hershs charge andstated that Desai had no connection to the CIA. That is how even retired and old persons,honest and so offended and outraged, would act. But see the self-incriminating contrast, thecomplete absence of such outrage, in Sonia, who is reigning as the chairperson of the UPAnow, neither retired or tired like the nonagenarian Morarji Desai, being just 41 when the story

broke out in Schweizer Illustrierte. Imagine, not Sonia or Rahul, but Advani or Modi hadfigured in the exposs of Schweizer Illustrierte or Albats. What would the media not havedone to nail them? What would the government of Sonia not have done to fix them?

Rs 20.80 lakh-crore loot

The billions of the Gandhi family being both bribes and monies stashed away in Swiss banks,they are inextricably linked to the larger issue of bringing back the huge national wealthstashed abroad. All world nations, except India, are mad after their black wealth secreted in

Swiss and like banks. But India has shown little enthusiasm to track the illicit funds ofIndians in Swiss and other banks. Why such reticence?

When during the run-up to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, the BJP leader L K Advanipromised to bringing back, if voted to power, Indian monies estimated between $500 billionand $1.4 trillion stashed abroad, the Congress first denied that there was such Indian moneyoutside. But when the issue began gathering momentum, Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhihad to do damage control and promise that the Congress too would bring back the nationalwealth secreted abroad. Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a non-profit institution workingagainst global black funds, has recently estimated that the Indian wealth secreted away isabout $462 billion, approximately equal to Rs 20.80 lakh-crore. The GFI says that more thantwo-thirds of it was looted away under the liberalisation regime. This is what the GFI says


5/35

about the character of the loot: From 1948 through 2008, India lost a total of $213 billion inillicit financial flows (or illegal capital flight) through tax evasion, corruption, bribery andkickbacks, and criminal activities. Does one need a seer to say under what head would the$2.2 billion in Sonia familys secret account (which would have grown to $9 to $13 billion bynow) fall? But accretions, if any, from the loot in 2G and CWG where the numbers are even

bigger are not still accounted. Now comes the more critical, yet practical issue. When theSonia Gandhi family is among the suspects who have secreted away monies abroad, how willit affect the efforts to bring back the wealth stashed away by others?

Looters safe

Just a couple of examples will demonstrate how the government is unwilling to go afterIndian money secreted abroad. As early as February 2008 the German authorities hadcollected information about illegal money kept by citizens of different countries inLichtenstein bank. The German finance minister offered to provide the names of the account

holders to any government interested in the names of its citizens. There were media reportsthat some 250 Indian names were found in the Lichtenstein Bank list. Yet, despite the openoffer from Germany to provide the details, the UPA-II government has never showed interestin the Indian accounts in Lichtenstein Bank. The Times of India reported that the ministry offinance and PMO have, however, not shown much interest in finding out about those whohave their lockers on the secret banks of Liechtenstein which prides itself in its bankingsystem. But under mounting pressure the Indian government asked for details not under theopen offer but strategically under Indias tax treaty with Germany. What is the difference?Under the tax treaty the information received would have to be kept confidential; but, if itwere received openly, it can be disclosed to the public. Is any further evidence needed to

prove that the government is keen to see that the names of Indians who had secreted moniesabroad are not disclosed?

The second is the sensational case of Hasan Ali, the alleged horse-breeder of Pune, who wasfound to have operated Swiss accounts involving over Rs 1.5 lakh-crore. The income taxdepartment has levied a tax of Rs 71,848 crore on him for concealing Indian income secretedin Swiss accounts. This case is being buried now. The request sent to the Swiss governmentwas deliberately made faulty to ensure that the Swiss would not provide details. Some bignames in the ruling circles are reportedly linked to Hasan Ali. That explains why thegovernment would not deepen the probe. It is Hasan Alis and the like who transport throughhawala the bribes of the corrupt from India. If Hasan Ali is exposed, the corrupt will stand

naked. This is how the hawala trader and the corrupt in India are mixed-up.

Is it too much to conclude that thanks to Sonia familys suspected billions in Swiss accountsthe system cannot freely probe the $462 billion looted from India at all? Tail-pieces: The totalwealth of both Gandhis, as per their election returns, is just Rs 363 lakh, Sonia owning nocar. Sonia lamented on November 19, 2010, that graft and greed are on the rise in India!!Rahul said on December 19, 2010, that severe punishment should be given to the corrupt!!!Amen.

Published in New York Times on, October 6, 2007

Sonia has never been in power. So if there are any money in Swiss accounts, they have to be


6/35

inherited from husband, or more likely, from Mother-in-law. Indira, the shrewd person thatshe was could have kept money abroad in name of Sonia because she was a European andwas totally a domestic person then. She could easily migrate and lay hand on money if crisishappended in India. Many accounts are there blaming Indira Gandhi of visiting the airfieldwhere her son died, to take away his wrist watch which had details of the swiss account.

The bank and its officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial documents requested under aHigh Court order. The bank and its officials/lawyers deliberately withheld evidence from thePolice, and one of its account managers Susan Broadhead gave a false witness statement tothe Police.Another one of its managers Nicholas Campiche ( Now Head of Pictet AlternativeInvestments.) concocted a letter pretending to be a client and closed his account. The senior

partner (Ivan Pictet.) sought to have numerous documents destroyed,along with those copiesheld in their London offices of Pictet Asset Management. Initially stating that they wereforgeries then their lawyers Peters & PetersMonty Raphaeland the barrister CharlesFlint.Q.C. later had to admit in Court that the documents were genuine.

British Parliament. Hansard .29th March 2007.Barry Sheerman .M.P.quote.

Constituents of mine have lost 2 million through fraud. The fraudster used Pictet &Cie- a French Bank- and Pictet Asset Management to back the fraud being

perpetrated.(1) It is a criminal offence for a bank to knowingly act for an undischarged criminal bankruptin so far as it seeks to assist that criminal bankrupt in the fraudulent movement of monies. (Money Laundering.)(2) It is a criminal offence for a bank to lie to the police and the bankrupts trustee in

bankruptcy in so far as any knowledge of, or dealings with the bank was refuted .(3) A bank can be guilty of Contempt of Court if it fails to comply fully with the Courts orderfor discovery .(4) The banks contempt is further compounded if it fails to address its error after it isspecifically drawn to the to its solicitors attention. ( Monty Raphael).(5) It is a criminal offence under the Financial Services Act to seek to destroy evidence thatmight be relevant to an investigation .(6) It is a criminal offence not to relinquish control of funds to the Trustee immediately thefact of the bankruptcy is drawn to the banks attention.(7) It is a criminal offence to lie or otherwise obfuscate the lawful and proper enquiries of theF.S.A.In the F.S.A. cover up , they concluded that there had been Rogue elements in Pictet &

Cies , London operations . They had been moved from their London Office so who was thereleft to prosecute. Unbelievable.On Dec 9th,2008. the complaint was sent to 150 Members of the House Of Lords and 230Members of Parliament.*** We thankDavid Cameron. M.P. ( Canary Wharf Speech.) Dec. 15th. 2008.

NowPRIME MINISTER.(1) Bankers who behave irresponsibly should face professional consequences.(2) If anyone is found to have behaved criminally they must be prosecuted.(3) The F.S.A and the Serious Fraud Office should be following up every lead,investigating every suspect transaction .(4) We need to make it 100% clearthose who break the law should face

prosecution.(5) That we make sure we root out any wrongdoing that may have happened, whoever


7/35

is involved, however high or well connected they may be.Ivan Pictet.Member of the Law Society of England & Wales.International Bar Association Member.Written Parliamentary Questions received by the table office ..

(1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure that Swiss Banks such asPictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution under EU law even when the illegal act iscommitted by a London based subsidiary.(2)To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to protect the rights of UK citizenswho seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with subsidiary offices locatedin London.

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2010

Dark Secrets of India - Nehru Family TreeWho was the first prime minister of India?Who was her son to become Prime Minister of India?

Who was the Catholic Prime Minister of India?Who was the first Muslim Prime Minister of India?

Jawahar Lal Nehru's father was Motilal Nehru. His wife Kamla Nehru died of tuberculosis.Their only daughter was Indira Nehru, whom we more appropriately know as Indira Gandhi,was married to Feroz Gandhi.

Who is this Feroz? He was the Nehru family's kirana store guy's son who used to supply themgroceries in their home named Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil).

In Indian context, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be more important. Then why do weonly hear about Jawahar Lal Nehru who was Rajiv Gandhi's maternal grandfather, and neverabout his paternal grandfather? We do not even know his name! considering the history of thefamily and their socio-political stature in the country.

Rajiv Gandhi's paternal granfather was Nawab Khan, a muslim who married a Parsi (surnameGandhy - associated with Parsis) woman after getting her converted to Islam for marriage.This is why the myth about Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Therefore, Rajiv's father wasactually Feroz Khan before marrying Indira against her mother's wishes. His name waschanged to Feroz Gandhi before his marriage with Indira using an affidavit.

Now how did Indira Nehru get married to Feroz Khan, being the daughter of the PrimeMinister, especially in a conservative Indian society?

Indira Nehru used to study in Shantiniketan University started by Rabindra Nath Tagore. Shewas expelled for her misdemeanor. Indira went to England when her father Jawahar was too

busy in politics and illicit sex. In England, where their grocer's son Feroz was present at thattime, she changed her religion to Islam and got married to Feroz Khan.

Upon this, realizing that it would not be positive for the Congress party, Mahatma Gandhi


8/35

ordered Jawahar Lal Nehru to get Feroz's name changed to Feroz Gandhi. Now, only thename was changed and not the religion. And for public consumption, an institutional vedicmarriage was mocked. Such an inter religious and inter caste marriage was not allowed bylaw at that time. So in reality, Indira was never married to Feroz.

Indira had only one child with Feroz, Rajiv, thereafter they both lived separately, and Ferozdied of reasons unknown.

Then where did Sanjay Gandhi come from? He was Rajiv's brother, or Indira's son. SanjayGandhi was actually Sanjiv, rhyming with Rajiv. He was born when Indira Gandhi had illicitsexual relationship with Mohammad Yunus. Sanjay was even circumcised according toMuslim traditions. His name was changed to Sanjay upon being charged with theft inEngland and being given a new passport under political influence from Jawahar Lal Nehru.

Now Sanjay made Menaka, a sikh girl who was a model, pregnant. Her father colonel Anandforced Sanjay to marry her. Indira Gandhi changed Menaka's name to Maneka. Menaka

meaning dancer in Lord Indra's court did not appeal to Indira Gandhi.

Mohammad Yunus cried the most, publicly, upon Sanjay Gandhi's death in a plane crashbecause he was his biological father.

Both Sanjay and Rajiv Gandhi were bastards. And their mother Indira Gandhi..gave birth ttwo kids with different fathers, without being married.

Further Rajiv Gandhi went to Italy and fell in love with Sania Maino. To get married to her,Rajiv changed his religion and became a Catholic, changed name to Roberto. They gave birthto Bianka and Raul. Quite cleverly these names are presented to the public as Sonia, Priyankaand Rahul.

The surprise of surprises, Rajiv, even though he was a catholic, was cremated as per vedicrites in India.

Nehru family tree:


9/35

Source:http://mithhilarora.blogspot.in/2010/02/dark-secrets-of-india.html

Book exposes late Indian Prime Minister's personal life secrets

New Delhi: Nearly 24 years after her death, the dark secrets of the late Indian Prime MinisterIndira Gandhi have began to come to light, beginning with her alleged "love affair" with
http://mithhilarora.blogspot.in/2010/02/dark-secrets-of-india.htmlhttp://mithhilarora.blogspot.in/2010/02/dark-secrets-of-india.htmlhttp://mithhilarora.blogspot.in/2010/02/dark-secrets-of-india.htmlhttp://mithhilarora.blogspot.in/2010/02/dark-secrets-of-india.html


10/35

Punjab's present CM Prakash Singh Badal. Journalists who interviewed Mrs. Gandhisometime in the beginning of 1984 also report to have heard her say that Sukhbir SinghBadal, son of the Punjab CM was like a son to the late Prime Minister. Congress PresidentSonia Gandhi has brushed aside any such claims and stated that her late mother-in-law was awoman of strong character and high morales.

Meanwhile wide spread protests have been raging in the Indian capital following the releaseof the book, entitled "When Gandhi met Badal". Rioters clashed with police who had toresort to using tear gas.

-Reuters

Sukhbir Badal Files Multi million dollar defamation case against internet poster Mehtab

Chandigarh(ANI): Sukhbir Badal, President Akali Dal (Badal) has filed a defamation case

against an internet poster known by the name of Mehtab Singh on various internet forums.Initial sources revealed that Mehtab Singh has been particularly active in gossiping aroundvarious political leaders of Punjab. Brushing aside the allegations made by Mehtab Singh,Sukhbir said that if he an ilegitmate child , then so is Rajiv Gandhi.Insiders reveal that Mehtab Singh is now facing a multi-million dollar case which he is likelyto loose. But when we spoke to some Badal Dal workers who wish to be kept anonymous ,they said that the news was indeed true and what Mehtab Singh has said what they couldntsay for a long time.More than two -third of Akali Dal(badal) workers have sought resignationfrom Sukhbir and now want Mehtab Singh to head Akali Dal.Apparently they want the new

party be named as Akali Dal( MehtabAprilSingh)

www.mehtabfirstofapril.com/news/newstoday/punjab/mehtab_million_dollar.html

New Delhi- After receiving summons from the Patiala High Court for defaming the name ofthe Badals, Mehtab Singh has challenged Punjab CM's son Sukhbir Singh Badal to get hisDNA tested and prove that his mother is not the late Indian Prime Minister Mrs. IndiraGandhi. Mehtab claims to have medical evidence that Sukhbir's mother is the slain PM whogave birth to him an year after his father, the Punjab CM Prakash Singh Badal assisted her inousting the then PM of India, the late Shri Morarji Desai. Speculations have started arising asto what exactly the assistance was. Unclaimed reports also indicate towards suspicion ofIndira having another illegitimate child from General Kuldeep Singh Brar who was the main

hand behind Operation Bluestar, the assault on the holiest Sikh shrine, the Golden Temple.Brar has denied any such report and states that he was diagnosed as impotent soon after theassasination of Mrs. Gandhi.

- Reuters

DARK SECRET OF NEHRU FAMILYJAWAHAR LAL NEHRU:Jawahar Lals father was Moti Lal and Moti Lals father wasGangadhar Nehru. His wife was Kamala Kaul Nehru, who died in Switzerland ofTuberculosis. M. O. Mathai in his bookReminiscences of the Nehru Agewhich openssecret of Jahawarlal Nehru relationship with a Beneras girl. His relationship with several

teens , drinking wine, smoking with Edwina Mountabattien & others secretly. (Link:http://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htm )
http://www.mehtabfirstofapril.com/news/newstoday/punjab/mehtab_million_dollar.htmlhttp://www.mehtabfirstofapril.com/news/newstoday/punjab/mehtab_million_dollar.htmlhttp://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htmhttp://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htmhttp://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htmhttp://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htmhttp://www.mehtabfirstofapril.com/news/newstoday/punjab/mehtab_million_dollar.html


11/35

Nehru wrote letters to Edwina , after she left India, until her death. In his letters, Nehru oftensought Edwinas advice on matters of governance and strategy, according to British authorJanet Morgan who was given access to the correspondence by the Mountbatten family.

Morgan was given a small box weighing more than five pounds. The box contained all theletters Nehru wrote to Edwina between 1948 and 1960. A few of them even had a rose

pressed between the pages.According to Morgan, in one of those letters, Pandit Nehruapparently wrote about the embarrassment VK Krishna Menon, Indias first highcommissioner to the Court of St. James, had become.Pamela Mountbatten, daughter of LordMountbatten and Edwina, in an interview to Karan Thapar on Devils Advocate on CNN-IBNnews channel, said that the Edwina-Nehru relationship was also of use to her father. And thatLord Mountbatten often appealed to Nehru given the influence Edwina had; this was

particularly useful while handling tricky situations like Kashmir.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwina_Mountbatten,_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burma )

(http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/)

In 1929 Nehru father Motilal made a report , after that Muslims in India demanded newcountry.Then Jinnah who was in Congress Party was forced to join Muslim League.Nehruwas so eager to take position of Prime Minister,created differences with Jinnah.Nehru evendidn`t thought of poor people who died in civil war between Hindus Vs Muslims.(Link:http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=11931&p=3&topicID=5230238 )

Nehru is responsible for division of India. Jinnah wanted some reservations on Muslimminority but Nehru`s only vision was to be Prime Minister of India. In 1929 , that happeneddue to Nehru report Vs Jinnah report . Sardar patel was the prime and senior candidate forPrime Minister position but Nehru got Vote & support of Mahatma Gandhi .

In 1931 Nehru & his congress party could save to BHAGAT SINGH , but he didn`t. At thattime he ignored the matter.

In 1934 when Mahatama Gandhi isolated from Indian National Congress due to bad policy ,Nehru was president of congress who decided to support Britishers in 2nd World War. Thistook 10 years time from 1934-1944 , delayed in freedom.

Why Jinnah Joined Muslim League, because protested Congress support to join with Britainon World war 2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Deliverance_(India)

The truth is Gandhiji resigned from Indian National Congress in 1934 & never joined. Nehruwanted to be the Prime Minister of India. He had vote of just 2 persons out of 14, congressvoted 12 votes to Sardar Patel. At that time Nehru blackmailed Gandhi that he will breakupCongress & then Britishers will divide India into 536 Princely States.Also , Gandhiji was notin Delhi at the time of Independence Day either on 14th Jan or 15th Jan. Gandhiji was inKolkata,he said that is not a full independence. That greed brought division of India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwina_Mountbatten,_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwina_Mountbatten,_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwina_Mountbatten,_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burmahttp://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=11931&p=3&topicID=5230238http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=11931&p=3&topicID=5230238http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=11931&p=3&topicID=5230238http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Deliverance_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Deliverance_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Deliverance_(India)http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=11931&p=3&topicID=5230238http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/nehru-was-lost-for-years-in-a-trunk-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwina_Mountbatten,_Countess_Mountbatten_of_Burma


12/35

In 1948 he foolishly gave Kashmir matter to United Nations without caring people. He waswaiting for social unrest in Kashmir in 1947 ..It was Sardar Vallavbhai patel who made Indiaas a Republic merged Hyderabad & Junagadh.( Link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47 )

He also refused to join UN offer of India`s permanent membership & gave this to China.(Link:http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091650380800.htm )

He was scared of truth, was trying to weak Indian Army. In 1961 he went to China & gavestatement that Tibet is not a part of China but part of Indian occupied Tibet(Sikkim) is part ofIndia , without boosting Indian Army, that brought China attack on India on 1962.(Link:http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/339559.aspx )

CIA war Analysis on 1962 Indo-China warhttp://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdf

***************************************************************************

***

INDIRA GANDHI:Jawaharlal Nehru only daughter was Pridarshani Nehru (LalbahadurShastri gave her name Indira) who later married to Feroz Khan ,was from the Junagadh areaof Gujarat, a grocer supplied wines, etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as IshratManzil, which once belonged to a lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Moti Lal Nehru was earlier anemployee of Mobarak Ali. Feroze Khan, was then in England with pridarshani Gandhi ,married in a London mosque. Ferozes mothers family name was Ghandy, often associatedwith Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with IndiraGandhi, by an affidavit.But Indira gandhi married to another man named MohammadYunus.After Rajivs birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced.

In 1971 Indira Gandhi gave support to Muktiwahanisena in East Pakistan, she also ignored40 Lakh illegal immigrants in North-East, now in West Bengal illegal Bangladeshi are morethan 2 crore. (Link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_in_India )

She also released 90,000 Pakistani soldiers in 1971 war without taking Indian soldiers whowere captured by Pakistani Army.

This kind of ignorance & neglence on North-East india creates extremism & militancy inIndia in 1980s.

She also failed to stop huge amount of corruption that brought 1977 revolution under J.P.Narayan, but she arrogantly made emergency in 1977.(Link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India) )

*************************************************************************************

SANJAY GANDHI:Incidentally, Sanjay Gandhi(a playboy) marriage with the Sikh girlMenaka (modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) took place in Md. Yunus(showed unhappiness in his bookPersons, Passions & Politics) house in New Delhi.

***************************************************************************
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091650380800.htmhttp://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091650380800.htmhttp://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091650380800.htmhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/339559.aspxhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/339559.aspxhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/339559.aspxhttp://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdfhttp://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdfhttp://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_in_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_in_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_in_Indiahttp://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdfhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/339559.aspxhttp://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/09/16/stories/2009091650380800.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47


13/35

***********

RAJIV GANDHI:-Rajiv Gandhi was son of Mohammad Yunus,changed his religion tobecome a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv became Roberto. Hisdaughters name is Bianca(priyanka) and sons name is Raul(Rahul). he mislead people of

India that he was a Mechanical Engineer but he not passes a single exam .He gave pressconference in London after Prime Minister that he was a parsi but cremated as per vedic ritesin full view of Indias public.

When her mother Indira died in 1984 he has given full support to Congress supporters inDelhi to spread pogroms in Delhi , Gave huge amount of money, Liquors,Arms toCongressmen to spread violence against Sikhs only for vote-Bank politics, played withemotions of people.

In 1989 he also supported Ayodhya issue to gain Hindu Vote, later Congress Government (P.V. Narshima Rao) ordered to demolish Babri Maszid.

Quattorachi met sonia Gandhi 21 times after Rajiv Gandhi death between 1991 to 1993http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13133&SKIN=B

In 1989 when Congress Government was in Centre & in Bhopal ,Rajiv Gandhi supported toflee Bhopal Gas Tragedy suspect Enron owner Quattorochi.

In 1990 he ordered Indian Army to do nothing against extremism , later terrorists killedthousands of Hindus in Kashmir , and 4 Lakh forced to migrate. Because at that timecongress was in no mood to displease their vote-bank people & party .( Link:-http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/2038.html )

26/11 wikileaks

Miniority politicshttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.html

Sonia Gandhi truth http://www.india-

Political unrestOpponents had long made allegations that Indira's party, Congress, had practiced electoralfraud to win the 1971 elections. The Gandhian socialist Jayaprakash Narayan had beenagitating in Bihar for a change in provincial government, and increasingly sought to direct

popular action against the Central Government through satyagrahas.Narayan and his supporters sought to unify students, peasants, and labour organisations in a'Total Revolution' to nonviolently transform Indian society. Indira's party was defeated inGujarat by a coalition of parties calling itself the Janata Party (People's Party), and even facedan all-party, no-confidence motion in Parliament.[edit]The Allahabad convictionSee also State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj NarainRaj Narain, who had been defeated in parliamentary election by Indira Gandhi, lodged casesof election fraud and use of state machinery for election purposes against Mrs. Indira Gandhiin the Allahabad High Court. On 12 June 1975, Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha of the Allahabad

High Court found the Prime Minister guilty on the charge of misuse of governmentmachinery for her election campaign. The court declared her election null and void and
http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13133&SKIN=Bhttp://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13133&SKIN=Bhttp://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13133&SKIN=Bhttp://www.hindujagruti.org/news/2038.htmlhttp://www.hindujagruti.org/news/2038.htmlhttp://www.hindujagruti.org/news/2038.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/wikileaks-congress-party-playing-religious-politics/137131-53.htmlhttp://www.hindujagruti.org/news/2038.htmlhttp://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=13133&SKIN=B


14/35

unseated her from her seat in the Lok Sabha. The court also banned her from contesting anyelection for an additional six years. Some serious charges such as bribing voters and electionmalpractices were dropped and she was held responsible for misusing the governmentmachinery, and found guilty on charges such as using the state police to build a dais, availingthe services of a government officer, Yashpal Kapoor, during the elections before he had

resigned from his position, and use of electricity from the state electricity department.Because the court unseated her on comparatively frivolous charges, while she was acquittedon more serious charges, The Times described it as 'firing the Prime Minister for a trafficticket'. However, strikes in labor and trade unions, student unions and government unionsswept across the country. Protests led by J.P.Narayan, Raj Narain and Morarji Desai floodedthe streets of Delhi close to the Parliament building and the Prime Minister's residence. The

persistent efforts of Raj Narain, was praised worldwide as it took over four years for JusticeJagmohan Lal Sinha to finally pass judgement against Indira Gandhi. The ruling later becamethe primary reason for the imposition of emergency by Indira Gandhi.Do you think Indira Gandhi was fraud?View Profile

Indian Scam History:

From : Priyangshu Borthakur at 08:23 PM - Oct 24, 2009 (22 months ago)

Total Views: Share it on Facebook In India, when we read the word SCAM (GAFLA), afew names blink in our mind. Harshad Mehta, Ketan Parekh and R. Raju!! Thats all? Theseare the most familiar names we know. But in this article we are going to study some unknownor forgotten hidden dragons of Indian SCAM (Gafla) History after independence of ournation. some rare pictures of people involved in these scams are uploaded!!

In India, when we read the word scam(gafla), a few names blink in our mind. Harshad Mehta,Ketan Parekh and R. Raju!! Thats all? These are the most familiar names we know. But inthis article we are going to expose some unknown or forgotten hidden dragons of Indian scam(gafla) History after independence of our nation.

Lets start with the 1st decade after independence. Well, no wonder people have forgotten itbecause so many other important events were there to remember.

Year: 1948

Name: V.K.Krishna Menon

In year 1948, V K Krishna Menons name was linked to a scandal .The Indian governmenthad placed an order with a London-based firm, that had false credentials or no credentials.Indian government placed 2000 jeep order. While most of the money was paid up front, just155 jeeps landed. Important point to note down that Krishna Menon went on to becomeJawaharlal Nehrus trusted supporter / follower and the defence minister. OK, dont give asarcastic look with moving one eyebrow up! :-D still much more to read!

Year: 1949

Name: Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh

We Indians have bad memory, and in addition, big heart!! Does anyone remember that in


15/35

1949, Mr Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh, industrial minister ,was guest of Indian jail for 3 years fortaking a bribe from a diamond merchant Mr Sachendu Baron. Bribe of Rs 25,000. Reasonwas to renew his diamond- mining lease!! Please note, only Rs 25,000 exchanged hands on

paper. (if you still wonder the name Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh you have heard somewhereI would like to add that he was father of Mr Arjun Singh) :-)

Year: 1958

Name: T T krishnamachari, H.M.Patel , L.S.Vidhyanathan

Krishnamachari(Finance minister), H.M.Patel (Secretary) (Oh, again one Gujarati) ,Vidhyanathan(LIC chairman), are some of the names linked to a Scam(gafla).The wholescam(gafla) was exposed by Firoz Gandhi(better known as Indira Gandhis husband),scam(gafla) was about investing LIC money in companies owned by one person. Name wasHaidas Mundra. Amount of investment was 1.25 crore. After being exposed Krishnamurtiresigned and Haidas Mundra had to visit Indian jail for some years. Think again friends, is

your investment safe in your favourite insurance company?

Year:1959

Name: Ramakrishna Dalmia

In the year 1959, R.K. Dalmia, chairman of Bharat Insurance Company misused his positionfor around Rs 2.2 crore Scam(gafla). Of course, he was arrested later on and sent to jail fortwo years. That is why i m writing this article now.( you did not noticed the name of thecompany. It was insurance company again) :-)

Year : 1960

Name: Dharma Teja

A business man named Dharma Teja got government loan for starting shipping company.Amount 22 crore Rs. (remember ,in 1960) And he shipped the same amount out of thecountry!! No one knew that is what he meant when he said Shipping Company!! He wasarrested and jailed for 6 years in Europe.(lucky chap) !.

Year :1965

Name: Biju Patnnayak.

Biju Patnayak was arrested by Indian police when the scam(gafla) was exposed. He favoredhis private company named Kalinga Tube for government contract. He did not succeed at thattime but after man years his son became chief minister of the same state. (it happens only inIndia)

Year:1970

Name: Indira Gandhi (yes, Indira Gandhi)

One guy named Mr Nagarwal impersonated Indira Gandhi on phone and got 60 lacs. Rs.


16/35

From SBI. Later Mr Nagarwal and the officer who was investigation in charge diedsuspiciously! That is all we know about the scam(gafla). No one was arrested in this case.(Happy ending?!!)

Year:1974

Name: Indira Gandhi (again!!!), Sanjay Gandhi

This case is known as Marulti scam(gafla)! Indira Gandhis name came up again to favor hisson for license to make passenger can in restrictive environment area. Again that is all i knowabout that scam(gafla).

Year: 1976

Name: Indira Gandhi (hat trick!!), Sanjay Gandhi

This is the year when oil price was falling. A future contract on oil was awarded to Kuo OilCo. to take future delivery. Government lost 13 crore Rs. In this transaction. One belief isthere that this amount had gone to Indira Gandhi and Sanjay Gandhi. In one word we can sayit was a scam(gafla)

Year:1980

Name: H.N.Bahuguna, N.N.Kapadia(a Gujarati again), P.C.Sethi and K P Unnikrishnan

These names were well known during 1980s. From the Eighties, H.N.Bahuguna(petroleumsecretary), P.C.Sethi (petroleum minister ) and many other people were arrested inscam(gafla) of Thal Vaishet Project, which were awarded with violation of norms, to oneItalian company Snamprogetti (tough to pronounce,but easy to write) :-) !!

Year:1981

Name: A.R.Antulay

The scandal is known at Great Maharashtra Cement scam(Gafla) (even if it is Scam(gafla),great word is always there with Maharashtra :-) ). A.R.Antulay, Chief minister ofMaharashtra was charged for giving the cement contract to private company for personal

gain.

Year: 1986-87

Name: Rajeev Gandhi

Rajeev Gandhi and other were accused to receive Rs.64 crore in payoff for 155 mm howitzerdeal from Swedish firm named Bofors. We all know this Scam(gafla) as Bofors scam(gafla).

Year:1991

Name: L.K.Advani, V.C.Shukla, C.K.Jaffer Sharief, Arif Mohammed Khan, Madan LalKhurana, Kalpnath Rai, N.D.Tiwari (Not a single Gujarati in list!!)


17/35

In year 1991, L.K.Advani, V.C.Shukla, C.K.Jaffer Sharief, Arif Mohammed Khan, MadanLal Khurana, Kalpnath Rai, N.D.Tiwari (Not a single Gujarati in list!!) Were accused for 64crore Rs. Jain Hawala scam(gafla). As a common man all we know is the name of thisscam(gafla) i.e. Havala scam(gafla).

Year: 1991

Name: Harshad Mehta :-)

1991 was the year which changes the scale of financial scam(gafla) in India. Rs.10,000 croreRs. Security scam(gafla) by the person (Gujarati person) named Harshad Mehta with other

baned SBI, NHB, Gridlays, City bank, Stanchart. Indian scams(gafla) are rising with time. (they say India is a growing nation.)

Year:1992-1994

Name: Laloo Prasad Yadav (we have reason to smile while reading this name)

Bihar Chief minister Laloo and other politicians were accused to siphoned 950 crore Rs.From state animal husbandry department. The case is still unsolved mystery.

Year:1996

Name: Gopalkrishnan.

Gopalkrishnan was managing director of Indian bank. He was accused to sanction loan of1500 crore Rs. To companies without adequate securities.

Year: 1996

Name : Sukhram,Runu ghosh.

Formar telecom minister Sukhram and Ghosh were charged for the first Indian telecomscam(gafla). They were accused to give favours to many telecom companies. Approximately1 million $ notes were found at his place. They were charged to favour Advanced Radio MastLtd.(ARM) for some telecom contracts. Later they were arrested.

Year : 1996

Name : Maharashtra government

In 1996 owners of several large shoe companies in Mumbai were charged to have floatedbogus cobbler co-operatives firms to get low interest loans from the Maharashtragovernment.

Year: 1998-2000

Name: Dot com companies.


18/35

During 1998-2000 there was a bubble of Initial Public Offering. Many companies decided togo public. Everyone wanted to go public. They are using one word diversification for

public fund. Total stupidity. They are showing some unrealistic diversification and gettinghuge amount from small investors. No name was written above because many companies

were raising public funding that way. I am sure if you are still reading this article you must bevictim of such scam(gafla) by any of those companies. We know this scam(gafla) asVanishing Companies scam(gafla). During these period many other scam(gafla)s took place.One of them was the growth of non-banking finance companies (NBFC). Most of them builthouses of cards, took investors for a massive ride and died.

Year: 2000

Name: plantation companies.

It was funny. Who will believe that it was golden period of plantation companies.

Investors were asked invest in some dummy schemes. For example: Put money in one teaktree and you will get 2000 times the returns in nine years, they were promised. The

plantation companies could get away with wild profit projections and there were noregulation on these companies. And we think investor in India is smart!!!

Year: 2000-2002

Name: Ketan Parekh

One more bubble was generated by this mastermind during era of dot com. He managed tohandle 1500 crore scam(gafla) with help of some banks. It was time when the big bailout ofUnit Trust of India came. Since UTI is set up under its own Act, it was the taxpayers who

paid for the Rs 4,800 crore bailout in 1999. In 2003, it was back buying recklessly into theKetan Parekh- traded scrips and later suffering big losses in the process. And after that KetanParekh was arrested and banned in Indian stock exchange. But no one is responsible for smallinvestors huge losses till date.

Year: 2008

Name : R. Raju.

Mr.E.A.Sharma former secretary of economic affairs department was not satisfied withSatyams balance sheet. But no one took him seriously, or E.Sreedharan, managing directorof Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) when he alleged that the Andhra metro rail linealignment was altered and extended to benefit the bidder (Maytas). Nobody questionedSatyams quarter-to-quarter growth and margins. Nobody wondered why the promoters wereconstantly dis-investing in their company and in 2008, during world recession period, onescam(gafla) was exposed and Satyam bubble busted. Rest is history we all know very well.

Conclusion:

This is 2009. And we all are living in same country. The motive behind this article is not to

create panic in investor. It is just information. When one scam(gafla) takes place, it is notbecause of the master mind behind that scam(gafla) but unawareness of investors.


19/35

Sadly, investors in all countries get carried away by media, hype and stupid publicity. Theydo not have the time to study or the knowledge to analyse their investments. Nobody has timeto study their investment if things are going good. And they will analyse the same whenscam(gafla) is exposed. They wake up as the scam(gafla) is exposed. You, me andeveryone We all are part of this system. We all face this situation. Making money is stock

exchange is very easy But some homework isneeded. And it is must. Its like Najhar HatiDurghatna Ghati !! Precaution is better than cure. Invest wisely. Give time to yourinvestment.

Moral of the Article :

Caution: stock market investment is subject to market risk. Please read the offer documentcarefully before investing.

Bofors ScandalFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe Bofors scandal was a major corruption scandal in India in the 1980s and 1990s, initiated

by Congress politicians and implicating the prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi and several otherswho were accused of receiving kickbacks from Bofors AB for winning a bid to supplyIndia's 155 mm field howitzer. The scale of the corruption was far worse than any that Indiahad seen before and directly led to the defeat of Gandhi's ruling Indian NationalCongress party in the November 1989 general elections. The Swedish company paid64 crore (US$11.65 million) in kickbacks to top Indian politicians and key defenseofficials. The case came into light during Vishwanath Pratap Singh's tenure as defenceminister, and was revealed through investigative journalism by a team led by N. Ram of thenewspaper The Hindu. The journalist who secured the over 350 documents that detailed the

payoffs was Chitra Subramaniam reporting for The Hindu. Later the articles were publishedin The Indian Express and The Statesman when The Hindu stopped publishing stories aboutthe Bofors scandal under immense government pressure and Chitra Subramaniam moved tothe two newspapers. In an interview to her published in The Hoot in April 2012 on the 25thanniverssary of therevelationshttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1StenLindstrom, former chief of Swedish police discussd why he leaked the documents andthe role of whistle-blowers in a democracy

Chronology of events and investigation

On March 24, 1986, a $285 million (about 1,500 crore) contract between the Govt ofIndia and Swedish arms company Bofors was signed for supply of 410 155mm Howitzerfield guns. About an year later, on April 16, 1987, Swedish Radio alleged that Bofors

paid kickbacks to top Indian politicians and key defence officials to seal the deal.

The middleman associated with the scandal was Ottavio Quattrocchi, an Italian businessmanwho represented the petrochemicals firm Snamprogetti. Quattrocchi was reportedly close tothe family of Gandhi and emerged as a powerful broker in the 1980s between big businessesand the Indian government. While the case was being investigated, Rajiv Gandhi wasassassinated on May 21, 1991 for an unrelated cause by the LTTE. In 1997, the Swiss banksreleased some 500 documents after years of legal battle. On October 22, 1999 (when NationalDemocratic Alliance government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party was in power) the CentralBureau of Investigation (CBI) filed the first chargesheet against Quattrocchi, Win
http://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Stenhttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Stenhttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Stenhttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Stenhttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Stenhttp://thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=5884&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=1Sten


20/35

Chadha, Rajiv Gandhi, the defence secretary S. K. Bhatnagar and a number of others. Insecond half of 2001, Win Chadha and S. K. Bhatnagar died.

On June 10, 2002, Delhi High Court quashed all proceedings in the case so far. However, thiswas reversed by Supreme Court of India on July 7, 2003.

Meanwhile the central government changed and Indian National Congress came to powerafter 2004 Lok Sabha elections. On February 5, 2004, the Delhi High Court quashed thecharges of bribery against Rajiv Gandhi and others, On May 31, 2005, the Delhi HighCourt dismissed the allegations against the British business brothers, Shrichand, Gopichandand Prakash Hinduja, but charges against others remain. In December 2005, Mr B. Daat,the Additional Solicitor General of India, acting on behalf of the Indian Government and theCBI, requested the British Government that two British bank accounts of OttavioQuattrocchi be unfrozen on the grounds of insufficient evidence to link these accounts to theBofors payoff. The two accounts, containing 3 million and $1 million, had been frozen. OnJanuary 16, the Indian Supreme Court directed the Indian government to ensure that Ottavio

Quattrocchi did not withdraw money from the two bank accounts in London. The CBI, theIndian federal law enforcement agency, on January 23, 2006 admitted that roughly Rs21 crore, about US $4.6 million, in the two accounts have already been withdrawn by theaccused. The British government released the funds later.

However, on January 16, 2006, CBI claimed in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Courtthat they were still pursuing extradition orders for Quattrocchi. The Interpol, at the request ofthe CBI, has a long-standing red corner notice to arrest Quattrocchi. Quattrocchi was detainedin Argentina on 6 February 2007, but the news of his detention was released by the CBI onlyon 23 February. Quattrocchi was released by Argentinian police. However, his passport wasimpounded and he was not allowed to leave the country.

As there was no extradition treaty between India and Argentina, the case was presented in theArgentine Supreme Court. The government of India lost the extradition case as thegovernment of India did not provide a key court order which was the basis of Quattrochi'sarrest. In the aftermath, the government did not appeal this decision because of delays insecuring an official English translation of the court's decision.

A Delhi court provided temporary relief for Quattrocchi from the case, for lack of sufficientevidence against him, on 4 March 2011. However the case is still going on.

Allegations against CBI

CBI has been criticised by experts, social workers, political parties and people at large for themanner in which it has handled this case. Some points to note are:

Delay in lodging an FIR Delay in sending letter rogatories Not appealing against an judgement of the Delhi High Court in 2004 De-freezing of Quattrocchi's bank account in London by saying to the Crown Prosecutor that

there is no case against Qutrocchi Putting up a very weak case for Quattrocchi's extradition from Argentina. Subsequently, no

appeal against lower court's verdict

The withdrawal of the Interpol Red Corner notice


21/35

Finally, withdrawal of its case against Quattrocchi. Reacting to this, Chief MetropolitanMagistrate Vinod Yadav said that, "I agree that there are certain malafide intentions in thecase and there is no doubt in that"

Source :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandal

BJP chief Nitin Gadkari on Sunday launched a counter-attack on the Congress which hasalleged that he owned a flat at the controversial Adarsh Housing Cooperative Society through

proxy.

The BJP president tried to link an aide of a Congress leader with irregularities in organisingof the Commonwealth Games (CWG).

Addressing a rally in the outskirts of the Capital, he alleged that a real estate major which wasinvolved in construction of the Commonwealth Games Village was involved in a scam.Who owns this company? One of its owners is one Gupta. His nephew is Kanishka Singh.You all know who he is.....I seek answers from Congress president Sonia Gandhi, he saidaddressing the rally.

Kanishka Singh, an aide of Rahul Gandhi, was quoted as saying by the PTI that the allegationwas entirely baseless with an ulterior purpose.

AMETHI: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said he is "not too concerned"about Satyam Computer fraud in the long run as India has verySatyam's Development CentresThe Great Fall of Satyamdeep strength in IT but wanted the "guilty should be punished."

"On the one hand, the strength that we have in IT is a very deep strength. So with a long termview ... in a long term perspective, I am not too concerned about Satyam development,"Gandhi replied to a query on how concerned he was about the Satyam Computers scam.

He, however, made it clear that this does not mean that unlawful activities that took placeshould be ignored.

"On the other hand there has been activities that are unlawful and they should be looked intoand the guilty should be punished," Gandhi added.

Congress earlier said that the ruling UPA has made a distinction between Satyam, thecompany and its founder Ramalinga Raju and acted in a proactive and decisive manner to

bail out the beleaguered company.

Beard Rahul Gandhis surprise visit to Gujarat, spends 8 hours at IRMAAhmedabad, DeshGujarat, 10 August, 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandal


22/35

Rahul visited IRMA in SUV without red light and siren. Even no local police security wassought

Congress partys national General Secretary Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday paid surprise visit toGujarat.

Gandhi reached central Gujarats Anand based Institute of Rural Management(IRMA) andattended a closed door meeting organised by Institute of Rural Management, Anand (IRMA)in the morning. The institute is hosting a two-day long consultation on the challenges ofnegotiating Indias rural transformation: Evolving strategies for IRMAs response whichstarted on Tuesday.

As soon as Rahul entered the campus, his security persons took control of the main gate ofthe institute and didnt allow media persons to enter inside.

Rahul Gandhi was beard, and on driving seat of the black SUV when he arrived. He was not

dressed in his identical political white kurta/payjama dress but was in shirt and trouser.Hedrove himself from Ahmedabad airport to Anand. He was noting important points in his

personal diary during eight hour workshop. He took lunch with other participants in theworkshop itself. Rahul left Anand at around 5:30 and went back to Delhi through Ahmedabadairport at 7:40 pm.

Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi were out of India for a week time, which had createdcontroversy. After their arrival in India, Rahul Gandhi resurfaced for the first time in publictoday in Gujarat.

It should be mentioned that Prime Minister Manmohan Singhs one of the daughters hadstudied in IRMA.

Few things have exposed the state of political reporting in India than the news that SoniaGandhi is unwell.

Dozens of reporters, most of whom claim more access to 10, Janpath than all the rest, coverthe Congress party.

Yet, in a throwback to the Cold War days, none knew or none told the world what was

wrong, although there had been strong whispers for nearly a year.

****

Neelam Deo and Manjeet Kripalani of the Bombay-based Indian council of global relations,Gateway House:

As TV channels fell over each other [on August 4] to cover in minute detail, the unseemlysuccession drama of the chief minister of Karnataka, and the CAGs naming of Delhi ChiefMinister Sheila Dixit in the graft and corruption surrounding CWG, by 2.30 pm foreign TVagencies, the BBC and Agence France-Presse reported that Sonia Gandhi, had undergone

surgery in the United States.


23/35

The foreign news reports named Gandhis spokesperson, Janardhan Dwivedi, as the source ofthe information.

The news of Sonia Gandhis undisclosed illness and secret departure came as a shock toIndians Democratic institutions like the media and the Parliament, which should have

disclosed Gandhis condition as a matter of public knowledge, had kept silent.

The Congress Party carried no notice of its leaders illness on its website, and it is significantthat its spokesperson confirmed the news first to the foreign press.

If it felt it could not trust the Indian media with responsible reportage, the Indian media as acollective, has given it good reason. It is, increasingly part of the cozy nexus of politiciansand bureaucrats in Delhi, and is often partisan in its coverage, scoffing at the publics right toknow important events.

New Delhi: A veil of secrecy continues to shroud the illness of Congress president SoniaGandhi with even Indian missions in the US not being kept in the loop about where she is

being treated.

The Congress has been sparing in information about her sudden illness with partyspokesperson Janardan Dwivedi last week telling the media to respect her privacy. He said onFriday that the operation performed on Gandhi was successful, but did not disclose thecondition that led to her surgery in the US.

Gandhi is expected to be in New York for another three weeks for recovery, said sources.

According to some sources, Pulok Chatterjee, Gandhi's former private secretary, took leavefrom the World Bank where he is currently serving as executive director to handle logisticsrelated to her treatment. Chatterjee has informed the World Bank that he will be back inWashington Aug 10.

Chatterjee will be returning soon to take over as principal secretary in the Prime Minister'sOffice.

While the debate on whether powerful political figures should hide their medical conditionrages, reliable sources said that the Gandhi family wanted to keep it a strictly private affair.

Neither the Indian embassy in Washington nor the Indian consulate in New York aredisclosing in which hospital in the US Gandhi is being treated.

The unusual secrecy has fanned speculation that Gandhi might be suffering from cancer, withsome unconfirmed reports saying she is recovering at the Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, theworld's leading cancer treatment institute, in New York.

The hospital has refused to confirm she was admitted there, saying it respects patients'privacy.

The hospital apparently does not have Gandhi's name in the patient data system. Sources saidshe may be an an unlisted VIP patient.


24/35

A photograph in an Indian daily showed members of the Indian Congress Party in New Yorkwishing Gandhi a speedy recovery outside Sloan Kettering.

Veteran journalist, envoy and MP Kuldip Nayar, who has served as former prime minister

Lal Bahadur Shastri's media adviser and chronicled India's public life for decades, backsgreater transparency about Gandhi's illness.

'This should be transparent. This is how the relationship between the government and thepeople exists. Sonia Gandhi is the head of the ruling coalition and therefore represents thegovernment,' Nayar said.

'The Congress party should share with the people the nature of her illness and how long shewill be under treatment. As they have maintained secrecy, it has fed all kinds of speculation.And these rumours are alarming,' Nayar told IANS.

In the US and other democracies - quite in contrast to the opaqueness in authoritarian systems- health of political leaders and those in the public eye is under constant media scrutiny, butin India many politicians are known to hide their illness for a variety of reasons.

India's first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, had a stroke in Bhubaneswar butpeople were kept in the dark about his health right till his death in May 1964.

But since then there has been more transparency over the health of political leaders and thepublic kept informed about the knee surgeries of former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayeeor the heart surgery and other medical problems of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh fromtime to time.

New Delhi: Congress president Sonia Gandhi is in the US for an undisclosed medicaltreatment, the party said on Thursday. Gandhi placed her son Rahul and three others tooversee the country's oldest party during the two or three weeks she is expected to be away.

The Congress did not reveal the nature of 64-year-old Sonia Gandhi's illness but informedsources told IANS that she was being treated at the Memorail Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centerin New York. The hospital refused to confirm or deny that she was admitted there. The partyalso did not say when she left India.

Congress chief spokesperson Janardhan Dwivedi said Sonia would undergo surgery onFriday or Saturday, contradicting his own earlier statement that the operation had already

been performed.He said that Sonia Gandhi had formed a four-member group, including Rahul, a generalsecretary, to look after party affairs in her absence. Rahul is also, at present, accompanyinghis mother for the medical treatment abroad.

Besides Gandhi, the others in the group are long-time loyalists Defence Minister A.K.Antony, political secretary to Congress president, Ahmed Patel and Dwivedi himself.

'Sonia Gandhi has been recently diagnosed with a medical condition that requires surgery. On


25/35

advice from her doctors, she has travelled abroad and is likely to be away for two to threeweeks,' Dwivedi said here.

Congress sources said she had an abdomen-related ailment.

According to party sources, Gandhi was down with viral fever since Sunday and could notattend meetings of the Congress core committee.

Her last known public engagement was her 24-hour visit to Bangladesh from July 24.

Answering queries on Sonia Gandhi's health, Congress spokesman Manish Tewari said theparty had already issued a statement and even public personalities were entitled to certainamount of privacy in medical issues.

'Even public personalities are entitled to certain amount of privacy in so far as the medicalattention is concerned and I do hope that our friends in the media would bear that sensitivity

in mind,' he said.

Asked if Rahul Gandhi's presence in the group was an indication of a bigger role for him inthe organisation, Tewari said the statment made by Dwivedi did not need elaboration.

'I think there is a certain amount of circumspection and a certain amount of discretion andcertain amount of sensitivity that needs to be exercised. As and when if there is any update,we will keep you informed,' he said.

To a question about choice of a cabinet minister in the group, Tewari said the Congresspresident has entrusted the duty of looking after the day to day affairs of the party to seniorpersons who have also served in the organisation and there is no need to offer any commenton the committee.

'As I said earlier, I do not think there is any need to comment further on a decision which theCongress president herself has taken,' he said.

Answering another question, Tewari said Rahul Gandhi was accompanying the Congresspresident.

'Shri Rahul Gandhi is with his mother and as and when there is any update with regard to his

travel plans, we will keep you informed,' he said.

On Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi wishing Sonia Gandhi speedy recovery, Tewarisaid if somebody has wished her speedy recovery, there was no need to extrapolate it

politically or otherwise.

A party leader said the Congress headquarters had received reports of prayer meetings and'havans' conducted in different parts of the country, wishing Gandhi a speedy recovery.

Gandhi Family new land scam!

on: August 03, 2011, 03:13:40 PM


26/35

A new land scam been revealed by farmers of Hariyana state, Gurgaon. Which directlyconnected to Gandhi family members.

A few years back 850 acres of land been aquired from farmers of Hariyan by stategovernment for development. People had their building, fields and houses on this land and

they still have to give away this property.

Soon after that 5 acres of this land allotted to Rajiv Gandhi Memorial Eye Hospital. The landhas been given on lease for 33 years on price of 15lakh. Actual price of this land is much

bigger that is 50 crore.

Farmers realized this fraud and they decided to go in High court, and they filed the case. Highcourt soon going to start hearing.

Farmers demanded their land back rather than compensation. If this land can be used forother purposes then they want it back as per law.

Once again all rules and regulations been violated by state authorities for Gandhi family,since Soina, Rahul and Priyanka are Trustees of this hospital.

There is a possibility of more such scams on this land.

Any comments? If is this subject taboo? Will gladly delete if so....

Feroz Gandhi grand son of Indira Gandhi is considering legal action against the Americanauthor of the book "The life of Indira Gandhi" K. Frank. published by Harper Collins inLondon.

The book alleges:

Sanjay Gandhi had eliminated opponents during India's infamous Emergency in 1975. SanjayGaandhi who died in a air crash ordered his "hitmen"to "liquidate" several "human targets".

The book also explores Mrs. Indira Gandhi's problematic sex life and the possibility that herhusband FEROZE GANDHI have had an affair with her mother KAMALA NEHRU.

Biography Book is less then flattering about Maneka Gandhi. It describes her as "erratic and

uncontrolled" and says her "wild outbursts and tantrums" created a "pervasive atmosphere ofuncertaainty and anxiety".

The book alleges that Mrs. Gandhi have had affair with the Private secretary to JawaharlalNehru Mr. M. O. Mathai and many others.

"The only thing I did was to assess whether these rumors were credible" Frank said. "Iincluded them because everyone in Indira Gandhi's circle knew about them........It was 1000%inconceivable that Mrs. Gandhi's husband had an affair with the woman who became hismothert-in-law, she said.

------------------------------------------As I said in beginning will gladly delete if taboo subject.


27/35

Have no idea how majority of Indians feel...

Posts: 6,681

Who is this Feroze Gandhi

Tantric, As far as I know Indira Gandhi had two sons Rajiv and Sanjay. Rajiv has a son calledRahul and Sanjay has one called Varun. Who is this Feroze Gandhi? Does Sanjay have twosons Varun and Feroze?

There is no reason why this subject should be considered as taboo. India is a free countrywhere people have freedom of expression.

People like Feroze Gandhi give undue importance to these issues. After all this is anallegation and nothing is proved. Of course I wouldn't put it beside Sanjay Gandhi to get ridof his opponents.

Regarding affairs between Kamala Nehru and her son-in-law it is their personal affair anddoesn't concern anybody. People have this bad habbit of putting their noses in other people'saffairs.

Family secrets

L.K. Advani may have expressed deep regret over the allegations against Sonia Gandhi andher family in the BJP task force report on black money, surprising many of his partycolleagues and alliesbut the RSS is persisting with the charges, perhaps revealing the rifton the issue within the Sangh Parivar.

A front-page article in the latest issue of its weekly Organiser refers to an expos by Swissmagazine Schweizer Illustrierte about the bribes allegedly taken by 14 leaders of variousThird World countries, and says that the late Rajiv Gandhis name figured among those whohad reportedly stashed away this money in secret Swiss bank accounts. The name and the

photograph of the late Rajiv Gandhi appears along with that of other 13 leaders with a remarkthat bribes of 2.5 billion Swiss francs are kept in secret accounts in Switzerland. The amountof SF 2.5 billion equals $2.2 billion. This amount was said to have been in existence from

prior to June 1988, it says. In fact, the article goes a step further and quotes passages from abook The State Within a State: the KGB and its Hold on RussiaPast, Present, and Futureby Yevgenia Albats to level more allegations against the Gandhi family and its association

with the KGB. The editorial also focuses on the BJPs task force report, and calls it avaluable document.

Saturday, July 23, 2005

Gandhi dynasty - Behind the facade

Keerthi ReddyBehind the Facade of Priyanka Gandhi - The Genesis of Tyranny

"Yeh Hamara Kshetra Hai" (This is our area!) thundered the nasal voice from the campaignplatform at Rae Bareli. Sound like a mobster declaring his turf? Nope, it was the voice of the


28/35

28 year old inheritor of the Gandhi family's branded glamour puss, the Great White Hope fora nation composed of nearly a billion "darkies", the future Empress of India's underprivilegedherself, Shrimati Priyanka Vadhra Gandhi. The Indian media has found itself a new goddessto worship. The object of their affection is the product of the union between Rajiv and SoniaGandhi. This election campaign has revealed that come hell or high water, the Indian press

has taken it upon itself to groom and project this 28 year old half Italian, as the future leaderof India.

Elaborate mythologies and biographies have already been concocted for future editorialsabout her. The past months have exposed this little game of the newspapers as everyday'sheadlines were peppered with effusive eulogies in praise of Priyanka. From her choice of Sarion a given day to her "striking" resemblance to Indira, to the number of Jalebis that sheconsumed at Achhe Lal's shop, every minute boring moment of Priyanka Vadhra's life seemsto be the subject of unmitigated interest to her devout Bhakts from the Indian Press. It doesn'tseem to make any difference to them that the general public could give two hoots about thecolor of Priyanka's Saree. So it's pretty clear what the motivations of the press are, to act as

the manipulators who are preparing the ground for Priyanka's crowning. Given the utterfailure of Sonia Gandhi to project herself as a viable political leader of the Indian masses, theagenda seems to have shifted now to focus on Priyanka the hope of the future for Congress.

Given the fact that someday we may well be faced with the prospect of having to sufferPriyanka Vadhra as a Prime ministerial candidate, it behooves us to investigate further and doa little analysis on what this young woman is truly like starting with her family background.

It's quite apparent that Priyanka is representative of the newest generation of the Gandhifamily which has ruled Indian politics for over fifty years. The legacy of the Gandhi family isalso unquestionable, beginning with the Socialist nightmares created for India by her greatgrandfather, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in the 50's, the overwhelming dictatorial powerlust ofher grandmother Indira Gandhi and uncle Sanjay Gandhi in the 70's, all the way to theCorrupt greed of her father Rajiv Gandhi in the 80's and subsequently the unboundedambitions of her Catholic Italian mother Sonia Gandhi during the 90's. Given the mind

boggling range of criminal activities practiced by her antecedents, Priyanka sure has a toughact to follow. But she has already proven her family credentials by following the Gandhifamily tradition of failing to graduate from college.

The tradition of illiteracy in the Gandhi family dates all the way back to 90 years ago whenJawaharlal Nehru was somehow able to manage an academic degree from an accredited

college in London. Since then the members of the list of famous Gandhis from Indira, Feroze,Rajiv, Sanjay, Sonia and Maneka never had the ability to get an academic degree. Priyankaherself dropped out of Delhi University a few years ago. The Indian media however hasalways maliciously falsified this fact about her qualifications. Press report after press reportalways casually mentions that "Priyanka graduated from Delhi University a few years ago,following which she taught briefly at a Delhi school for children with spastic paralysis."Priyanka's aunt Maneka Gandhi has directly contradicted this falsification by stating onrecord that not a single member of the Gandhi family (including Priyanka) has been able toget a degree in the past 90 years.

Considering the immensely wealthy empire that the Gandhi empire has built via all sorts of

fraudulent schemes which have robbed India of billions, it is only natural that Priyanka hasgrown up with despotic tendencies. She was a pampered, spoilt brat who received any thing


29/35

that her heart desired and created the impression early in her psyche , that the being a Gandhiis somehow "superior" to being just any ordinary mortal. This tendencies were coupled withher mother Sonia's bigoted sense of superiority over Indians. It is a fact that Sonia Gandhimaintained her closest friendships with only "White" Europeans who were present in Indiafor the sake of business or on diplomatic missions. Another fact that distinctly influenced

Priyanka is the fact that Sonia Maino always has been and still is an exceedingly devoutRoman Catholic.

Priyanka's father Rajiv had to convert to Catholicism himself in order to marry Sonia. This isbecause Sonia is a baptized Catholic and the Catholic Church would not solemnize herwedding to Rajiv unless he specifically converted to Christianity. That Priyanka was raised ina strictly Christian setting is apparent from her choice of husband and her voluntary

participation in missionary work for the Missionaries of Charity. Priyanka's earliest rolemodels include her imperious grandmother Indira Gandhi, her father Rajiv Gandhi and themost unabashed proselytizer of them all, Mother Teresa. Years ago Rajiv had commentedabout Priyanka, "She is strong-willed like my mother,". This comparison with a grandmother

who treated India as her own personal fiefdom, was to leave a lingering impression onPriyanka. Her physical resemblance to Indira Gandhi as well as similarity of certainmannerisms had her convinced that like Indira, it was somehow Priyanka's destiny to "save"India, through her innate leadership.

By her own admission, Priyanka has said " Ever since I was a little girl Indiraji was a rolemodel. But as I grew up I became more and more influenced by my father. But I haveconsciously tried not to model myself on anyone. I am me. Priyanka Gandhi." The traces ofconceit are already self-evident in her assertive retort that she is a unique individual with

power and potency in her own right. In contrast to Priyanka's assertiveness, one of her onlytwo competitor's to the Gandhi mantle, her younger brother Rahul displays an awkwardnessand the type of submissive behavior, which does not a leader make. In comparison toPriyanka's strong and colorful demeanor, Rahul looks like an insipid hanger on. Much of hislack of self-esteem can be attributed to the explosive secret that Rahul Gandhi is in factmentally retarded. His mental handicap has been well hidden by the Gandhi family and theunconscionable press.

Rahul was in fact refused permission to some of Delhi's top institutions because of his mentalhandicap. A frustrated Gandhi family had then pulled strings at Harvard, where a quota ofseats is always available for a price to the rich and famous. Since then Rahul was bundled offto the US and later UK much as his father Rajiv Gandhi had been packed off to Cambridge in

the hopes that he would somehow muddle through an academic degree. Rajiv of course neverpassed a single test at Cambridge and instead of bringing home a degree came back with anequally illiterate Catholic au pair of Italian extraction as his wife. Following in his father'sfootsteps, Rahul too has come back without a degree to his name, and a fair skinned SouthAmerican Catholic girlfriend on his arm.

To Priyanka therefore the fact that her brother Rahul hardly counts has competition hasfurther strengthened her self-glorification and firm belief that she is the only legitimate heir tothe crown of Congress and India's leadership. Her mother Sonia has encouraged this qualityat every step knowing full well that Priyanka possesses the very traits which alienate Soniafrom the masses, chief among them being Priyanka's ability to talk fluently in Hindi.

Priyanka's qualifications for her trusteeship in the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation are laughinglylisted as "her experience as a teacher and educationist". The Foundation is of course nothing


30/35

but a front for Sonia and kids to siphon off millions of rupees from the Indian taxpayer. Theyhave refused to allow their accounts to be audited for over five years. Another alarming clueto the personality of Priyanka can be ascertained from her mother, Sonia's beliefs. In her book"Rajiv" (which she co wrote with Priyanka) Sonia focuses on the divine right of this family,in its destiny to serve India, to serve it as "sacrificial goats" as she puts it. Sonia believes to

the point of

Documents

ArticlesSonia Gandhi and Congress Secret Billions Exposed