Upload
vothu
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved.
ARTS Location Charter Version 2.0.0
2nd February 2016
Status of this Document This document is an ARTS “Last Call Working DRAFT Charter.”
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 2 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 2
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 4
2. VERSION CHANGE DOCUMENTATION ..................................................... 4
3. TEAM NAME ................................................................................................ 4
4. TEAM MISSION ............................................................................................ 4
5. BUSINESS JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................ 7
6. RETAIL MODEL INTERFACES/ARCHITECTURAL MODEL ...................... 8
7. REQUIREMENTS SCOPE FOR VERSION 1.0.0 ......................................... 9
In Scope for Version 1.0 ............................................................................................................... 9
Out of Scope for Version 1.0 ........................................................................................................ 9
8. REQUIREMENTS SCOPE FOR VERSION 2.0.0 ....................................... 10
In Scope for Version 2.0.0 .......................................................................................................... 10
Out of Scope for Version 2.0.0 ................................................................................................... 12
9. PCI AND SECURITY IMPLICATIONS ........................................................ 12
10. PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS ......................................................................... 12
11. INDUSTRY STANDARDS IMPLICATIONS ................................................ 12
12. BUSINESS VALUE PROPOSITION ........................................................... 13
13. USE CASE SURVEY .................................................................................. 15
14. REFERENCES............................................................................................ 16
15. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ............................................................................ 16
16. PLANNED DELIVERABLES ...................................................................... 16
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 3 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 3
17. GLOSSARY ................................................................................................ 16
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 4 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 4
1. Introduction This document serves as the ARTS Location Work Team Charter and executive overview
document. It has been developed following the, ARTS Development Process.
2. Version Change Documentation Event Changes Date
Initial Draft
2nd Draft
3rd Draft
Last Call Working Draft (LCWD)
LCWD submitted to TC for approval
LCWD TC approval with modifications
Version 2 3 Nov 2015
Submitted for Review 22 Dec 2015
Submitted for Approval 14 January 2016
Final Review 27 January 2016
Circulated to the team for Approval 2 February 2016
Please see the ARTS Technical Report: Best Practices -- Schema Extensibility available at
https://nrf.com/resources/retail-library/arts-white-papers for the approved method to extend this
and all ARTS schemas.
3. Team Name The proposed name for this ARTS Work Team is the Location Work Team.
4. Team Mission Increasing widespread use of mobile devices by both employees and consumers makes location
information extremely important to retailers. The Location Work Team intent is to provide a
common interface to access location information that can be used by higher-level applications such
as Store Locator, Product Locator, Shelf Restocking, Geo-Fenced Marketing, etc.
Standardized common interfaces to access information between retail mobile applications and
systems reduce TCO of innovative solutions and permit vendors and retailers to concentrate on
differentiating themselves on service rather than integrations..
The Location Work Team mission is to define schemas for standardization of the exchange of
location information with mobile devices used by retail customers and employees. Categories of
business applications include:
Marketing
Visual Merchandising (primary user)
Inventory Management
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 5 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 5
Customer Service
Operations
Analytics
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 6 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 6
Membership Roster
Board Sponsor:
Bart McGlothin Cisco
Chair Persons: Graeme Shaw Oracle
Charter Authors: Graeme Shaw Oracle
Richard Halter Global Technology Advisors/ARTS
Contributors:
Kent Ruesink JDA
Andy Mattice Lexmark
Matthew Kulig Aisle411
Dennis Blankenship Verizon
Karen Shunk NRF-ARTS
Shannon Byers Nielsen
John Glaubitz Vertex Inc
Michele Kosow Sophelle
Tai NGama FGL Sports
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 7 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 7
5. Business Justification What would be the benefits
of an ARTS XML
Location/Planogram
standard?
Promotions based on consumer’s location within and near
the store to drive traffic and conversion
Improved omni-channel customer shopping experience, for
example: ordering on-line and knowing where to pick it up
in the store
Retailers and their suppliers can readily exchange
planograms and location documents in standard format
regardless of the application that creates or consumes the
documents. (CPGs currently support multiple major
application formats), which benefits the retailer and supplier
by;
o Facilitating improved communication and
collaboration, eg displaying planogram details so
that a store associate can set the planogram
o Reducing errors in the translation of planogram and
location documents
o Providing standard planogram/location error
handling and correction (collaboration)
o Reduced implementation time for new suppliers and
internal applications which utilize planogram and
location documents.
o Reduced integration costs for retailers who
implement planogram/shelf optimization solutions
o Reduced maintenance costs over the planogram
solution lifecycle
o Reduce the number of formats that suppliers need to
provide retailers.
o Freedom to change/adopt components from
technology supplier, so a retailer can switch to using
a different vendor without breaking all integration
points
o Being able to communicate with automated devices,
such as robots or tablets that check for compliance,
or picking
o Support for IoT – smart products, smart fixtures,
smart stores
As with other ARTS XML Standards, these benefits are only achievable when a critical number
of participating solutions are in compliance with the standard. For many retailers, compliance with
ARTS XML Standards may become criteria for selection of a planogram/shelf optimization
solution.
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 8 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 8
6. Retail Model Interfaces/Architectural Model
Location
Replenishment
Price Optimization
(Digital)Signage
Fixturing
Product Lifecycle
ManagementAsset Management
Assortment Planning
Video Analytics
FloorplanPlanogram
Store Operations
Data Warehouse
BI
Direct Store Delivery
Loss Prevention
Mobile
In-Store Fulfillment
WEB Orders
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 9 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 9
7. Requirements Scope for Version 1.0.0
In Scope for Version 1.0
For Version 1.0, the primary scope was to enable consumers to interact with the retailer’s location
based apps and to influence higher basket, increased sales and consumer retention. That is, to
enable customers to locate items which are displayed, where they are located, and how they are
presented on a shelf.
Identify Store Location, Customer presence near the store or within the store.
Location in terms of store, floor, dept/category, aisle, fixture bay, orientation, shelf, XYZ
floor coordinates which would enable a 2d overview of what the store interior looks like.
Detailed item information (most specifically unit size)
Fixed dimension products only
Unit inventory
Item placement within a set of fixtures
Basically linear display and pegs
Effective date of planogram and store layout changes
Out of Scope for Version 1.0
Turn by turn directions (way finding) from point A to point B
Path of travel from point A to point B
Point in time stationary location of entities – movement (path) of customers, products and
associates
Define a store layout (macro store space) (store video)
o Apparel, random weight products
o Contractual information.
o Detailed shelf construction information
o Requires MFG coupon standards for personalized promotions
Way finding path obstructions
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 10 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 10
8. Requirements Scope for Version 2.0.0
In Scope for Version 2.0.0
Feature Description
Planogram
Detail Detailed fixture/shelf/equipment construction and location
Product item details (assortment, with core and optional, add/keep/drop,
brand, dimensions etc)
Product positions
Inventory model & replenishment methods/periods
User defined attributes (for product items, planograms, equipment, product
positions, planogram segment)
Labels/Signage/Promotional
Localization (units, languages, tax codes)
Financial Plan/ Reconciliation (to act as an input target to help the Visual
Merchandiser design the planogram)
Descriptions (source, author etc, version, dates)
Drawing elements (red-lining, notes, text, revision clouds)
Include Fashion and Random weight categories
Technology to support Planograms (such as RFID & smart fixtures)
Way Finding Provide directions for a path between two points, or a number of points if given
a shopping list of items to pick.
The standard wouldn’t define how to calculate the shortest path, but would
define how the path would be described.
Localization of path description (Path description could be floor/aisle/bay, or
turn left at a landmark, i.e. using different terminology based on recipient)
Inclusion of obstructions, elevators, escalators, stairs
Require assistance: Item is on top shelf, too heavy, wheelchair route, aisle
widths
Alternate paths
Sorting method for pick lists, eg heavy/frozen items last
Include outside yards/backroom
Picking for multiple lists (compare with warehouse standard)
Take account of IoT standard, with reference to movable objects, such as:
Person location
Customer
Employee
Fork lift
Shopping Cart
Floor waxer
Portable Equipment, eg product pallets
Both planogram and way finding require some kind of map or floorplan context. The floorplan or
map contextual data consists of:
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 11 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 11
A raster image of the store floor plan, as an output
A vector image, comprising of Cartesian coordinate values to define areas and objects,
including building architectural elements, such as elevators, stairs, common areas,
bathrooms, etc, as well as features that identify, name and describe areas of interest to the
business, such as fixturing and equipment.
Planogram and SKU performance data, for analytical purposes.
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 12 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 12
Out of Scope for Version 2.0.0
Feature Description
Virtual worlds
Calculate shortest path
Warehouse Inventory Allocation
9. PCI and Security Implications If these capabilities are used with PCI compliant payments additional security features may need
to be implemented.
10. Privacy Implications Customer location inside or outside a store may be an issue even if the customer has opted-in.
These issues may vary by country, state or city.
11. Industry Standards Implications Existing industry standards related to this work will be used as needed. Examples of industry
standards related to location include:
GS1 Global Location Number
GS1 EPC Tag Data Standards
GPS global positioning standard of longitude, latitude and altitude coordinates
ISO 17438 Standardization for Indoor Navigation
National BIM Standard US
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 13 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 13
12. Business Value Proposition The purpose of location starts by describing the geographic location of the store and what is
available at the store. Then once the customer finds the store, they can be directed to the
dept/category within the store which may include directing the customer to the
aisle/bay/shelf/side of the aisle where the selected item is stored.
To provide a planogram of the store’s layout that can be defined within the context of a container
with fixtures and the layout of those fixtures. Eventually this container can be placed in a particular
location within the store.
Planograms represent the intersection between space utilization and category management, and is
an input to store level inventory replenishment. They provide a consistent set of structures through
which retailers synchronize the display of merchandise, inventory management, customer
convenience and efficient use of in-store space. By mapping merchandise categories (along with
planning and budgeting) to store space, retailers have the information needed to monitor, manage
and improve their gross margin return on inventory and leased or owned space.
Problem: Supplier and retailer systems utilize multiple formats for importing and exporting planogram
documents, mostly based on the application that is utilized.
Solution: ARTS will provide a standard set of formats for exchange of planogram documents and
description of their application based on the business operation context.
Problem:
Retailer wants to engage the supplier more actively in merchandising and product placement.
Solution:
The ARTS Technical Specification will provide a canonical understanding of the data
elements that make up the planogram to reduce the translation barriers for engaging
suppliers.
Problem:
Expense of interfacing to the various replenishment and merchandise planning systems.
Solution:
The standard Planogram reduces the cost of creating and maintaining interfaces.
Problem:
Limited penetration of planogram usage.
Solution:
Having a standard will enable more of the store to be mapped.
Problem:
Consumer knows that a product item is in the men’s department, but don’t know where that is.
Solution:
Having a standard method to describe a path of how to get from their current location to
the desired department.
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 14 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 14
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 15 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 15
13. Use Case Survey Following use cases are examples to help the team identify data objects needed for XML
messaging between business applications.
Planogram Exchange Use Cases
Use Case: Reset/execute a Planogram, including product, equipment and signage
Use Case: Create bill of materials (any equipment required to support or display the
merchandise)
Use Case: Stocking Merchandise
Scenario: Send alert to associate to replenish shelf stock
Scenario: Restock Returns
Use Case: Signage (eg product information, price, grocery store shelf label, or
promotional signage)
Use Case: Sorting Method for Shipping, to minimize effort for direct stocking to the floor
Scenario: picking sequence (heavy first and frozen items last)
Use Case: Where am I? Price depends upon where an item is consumed
Use Case: Sending store information between systems
Scenario: Send planogram information to 3rd party system
Use Case: Audit the stores for planogram compliance
Scenario: Operations confirms planogram changes, including photo
Use Case: Collaboration
Scenario: store outlines the problem for why a planogram cannot be executed
successfully, eg: column, fire extinguisher, obstruction
Scenario: corporate suggests a solution (using notes, markups or a new
planogram layout)
Way Finding Use Cases
Use Case: Provide directions for how to find a product
Scenario: Help shopper find a product
Scenario: Find all items on a list
Scenario: Fulfill online order
Scenario: Replenishment using fork lift truck or other vehicle
Scenario: Route for disabled
Scenario: Identify multiple locations for product
Use Case: Communication Method (Audible / Visual)
Use Case: Take account of Race track / Traffic Flow
Scenario: Max number of vehicles/people in an area
Use Case: Find Non Retail Items
Scenario: Directions for Emergency Services (Fire / Ambulance / Police)
Scenario: Service Engineers – to help locate the electrical room, elevator,
plantroom
Scenario: Printer has run out of paper – where are the printers located, and what
type are they?
ARTS Location V2.0.0 Charter Revision Date: 2016-02-02
Page 16 of 16
Copyright 2016 NRF. All rights reserved. Page 16
14. References http://www.gs1.org/sites/default/files/docs/epc/TDS_1_8_Standard_20140203.pdf
https://nrf.com/resources/retail-library/shoporg-think-tank-what-the-internet-of-things-
promises-retailers
https://nrf.com/news/tour-of-the-possible
Other relevant documents are available for download from http://www.nrf-arts.org
15. Outstanding Issues
ARTS XML does not currently support UN/CEFACT’s Core Component Technical
Specification (CCTS), which is being adopted by major industry standards setting
organizations. CCTS provides standard semantics for data exchange and would allow ARTS
to be more compatible with other XML standards.
16. Planned Deliverables Deliverable Estimated Date Actual Date
Announcement
Technical Specification
XML Schema
17. Glossary
Term Definition
Facings The number of product slots on the front of the retail fixture or visible from the
customer viewpoint.
Planograms Planograms are documents within Macro Space Management that hold details
of merchandise to be placed into the fixtures within a store. Planograms
define the type, quantity, and arrangement of the sales goods to be placed on
the fixtures.
Planograms are infinitely flexible and can be configured to hold any
combination of products that are suitable configuration for that specific store
fixture in which the products will be placed.
Fixtures That holds products that are either customer facing or for immediate
replenishment. Examples: bay, gondola, shelf, peg hook, glass case
Lead In The starting point for facings (end of the shelf).
POP Point of Purchase materials. Signage or special fixtures that accompany the
product placement.
Location Location involves the merchandise within the store
Placement Placement involves the placement within the merchandise fixture such as
shelves or pegs in the store