Upload
chloe-garrison
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Assessing a Campus-wide Internationalization Initiative: Aligning Assessments with
Institutional Outcomes
M. David Miller Timothy S. Brophy
University of Florida
Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for the Assessment of Learning in Higher Education, Albuquerque, NM, June, 2014.
Quality Enhancement Plan - SACSCOC
Learning Without Borders: Internationalizing the Gator Nation• Based on institutional assessment• Focuses on learning outcomes and enhances
student learning environment• Includes broad-based involvement of
institutional constituencies in development and implementation
• Identifies initiatives to promote learning outcomes
• Assesses their achievement for the institution
Development of the Initiative – Broad Based Involvement
Internationalization Task Force (ITF) formed in January
2011
ITF has representatives
nominated by the Deans of units across campus
ITF involves all stakeholders –
faculty, students, administration,
staff and others
InternationalizationInternationalization is the conscious integration of intercultural and global
competencies into student learning.
GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP Students comprehend the trends, challenges, and opportunities that affect our communities and communities worldwide..
CONTENT:SLO 1. Students identify, describe, and explain global and intercultural conditions and interdependencies
CRITICAL THINKING:SLO 2. Students analyze and interpret global and intercultural issues
COMMUNICATION:SLO 3. Students communicate effectively with members of other cultures
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATIONS Students interact effectively with members of other cultures.
Initiatives
Curriculum Enhancement
Study Abroad
Campus Life
International Calendar and International Event Support
International Scholars Program
For students: new and exciting courses for the International Scholars Program
For faculty: support and professional development opportunities to develop International Scholar courses
Curriculum Enhancement
For students: more scholarships and exciting new programs, especially
in underrepresented disciplines
For faculty: support and professional development opportunities to develop Study Abroad programs
Study Abroad
Develop a plan for the university to
showcase the new international calendar and
specific events through various
media
Develop suggestions for
synergies to harness UF’s
current sources of international
events
International Calendar
Students earn
medallions at graduation to
recognize their
international expertise
International Scholars Program
Assessment Principles
Direct and indirect assessments must measure progress on the SLOs
Outputs must measure participation in the initiatives
Each measure must have a planned use or interpretation (Validity)
Each measure must be reliably measured (minimize error)
Using Existing Instruments
It is easier t
o a
dopt a
n existi
ng i
nstr
ume
nt t
ha
n t
o
devel
op a
ne
w i
nstr
ume
nt
Easier is not better if you violate your principles!
That is, existi
ng i
nstr
ume
nts
must:
meas
ure t
he SL
Os;
be vali
d f
or its
pla
nne
d
uses a
nd i
nter
pretati
ons; a
nd
be relia
ble f
or y
our
pur
poses
Experts for Judging Alignment (Content
Validation)• International Task Force
• Assessment Committee (5-6 with expertise on content and assessment)– Curriculum experts– International Administrators– Psychometricians
Defining Review Criteria for Existing Assessments
Measures the SLOs
Validity Evidence
Reliability Evidence
Feasibility to Use in Our
Context
Factors in our decision to create our own assessments
Most commercial products had good reliability and validity evidence for their stated purposes
None matched our SLOs (Alignment problem)
Little evidence of feasibility for large scale use
Final Decision: Need to develop our own assessments
What Assessments do we need to Develop?
Direct Assessments focusing on SLO achievement
Must allow flexibility to measure learning in any
discipline
Needs to be aligned with Curriculum
Indirect Assessments of SLOs 2 and 3 only
Not appropriate for SLO 1 since Content is discipline-
based
Developing the Assessments
Writing the Assessment Items to
measure SLOs
Ongoing review for fidelity with the SLOs
and Initiatives (Validity)
Piloting to establish reliability and psychometric
properties of items
IntCRIT
1. I consider different perspectives before making conclusions about the world.
2. I am able to manage when faced with multiple cultural perspectives.
3. I am open to different cultural ways of thinking in any international context.
4. I can make effective decisions when placed in different cultural situations
5. Knowing about other cultural norms and beliefs is important to me.6. I am able to think critically to interpret global and intercultural
issues.7. I actively learn about different cultural norms.8. Understanding different points of view is a priority to me.9. I can recognize how different cultures solve problems.10. I can contrast important aspects of different cultures with my own.11. Knowing about other cultural beliefs is important.12. I am able to recognize how members of other cultures make
decisions
IntCOMM
1. I demonstrate flexibility when interacting with members of another culture. 2. I am confident that I can adapt to different cultural environments3. I am able to communicate effectively with members of other cultures4. I like working in groups with students from other countries.5. I feel comfortable in conversations that may involve cultural differences.6. When working on a group project, I enjoy collaborating with students from
other countries.7. I often ask questions about culture to members of other cultures.8. I enjoy learning about other cultures9. I appreciate members of others cultures teaching me about their culture.10. I am able to interact effectively with members of other cultures.11. I appreciate differences between cultures12. I feel comfortable discussing international issues.13. I can clearly articulate my point of view to members of other cultures
Direct Assessment
Rubrics developed for each of the three SLOs
Rubrics to be implemented in Curriculum and Study Abroad portion of the Initiative
Rubrics allow for discipline based content
Developing Rubrics
• The Association of American Colleges and Universities developed 15 Rubrics that can be used across programs and courses
• VALUE (Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education) rubrics were developed by faculty and assessment expert teams across the country -- used by more than 2000 institutions (http://www.aacu.org/value/index.cfm)
QEP Content Rubric
SLOComponents
Outstanding3
Satisfactory2
Unsatisfactory1
Not Applicable0
Concepts/Principles
Consistently and effectively demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the complexity of factors important to members of another culture in relation to its history, values, politics, communication styles, economy, and beliefs and practices.
Usually demonstrates understanding of the complexity of factors important to members of another culture in relation to its history, values, politics, communication styles, economy, or beliefs and practices.
Rarely or never understands the complexity of factors important to members of another culture in relation to its history, values, politics, communication styles, economy, or beliefs and practices.
Not Applicable to Assignment or Course
Terminology
Consistently recognizes and effectively utilizes important and relevant terminology regarding intercultural and global issues in the appropriate environmental context.
Usually identifies and implements important and relevant terminology regarding intercultural and global issues in the appropriate environmental context.
Rarely or never understands important and relevant terminology regarding intercultural and global issues in the appropriate environmental context.
Not Applicable to Assignment or Course
Methodologies
Consistently comprehends and effectively utilizes diverse and appropriate methodologies for understanding complex intercultural and global issues.
Usually comprehends and utilizes diverse and appropriate methodologies for understanding intercultural and global issues.
Rarely or never comprehends and utilize diverse and appropriate methodologies for understanding intercultural and global issues.
Not Applicable to Assignment or Course
Rubric Use
• Used for courses (curriculum) and study abroad
• Use must be approved by International Scholars Course Approval Committee
• Must adopt SLO(s) from program • Must show assignments and specific
tests that measure the rubrics• Otherwise, not part of International
Scholars program
Assessment PlanUniversity wide impact
Indirect Assessments
SERU Biennial, odd years
IntCrit and IntComm – Annual – Fall - Sampling
Outputs
Monitor participation and implementation - Annual
Impact on those taking courses or Study Abroad
Direct Assessments - Rubrics
Indirect Assessments – IntCrit and IntComm
Output – Number of students and options
For further information:
• See QEP online:http://sacs.aa.ufl.edu/sacs-reports• Contact us:
[email protected]@ufl.edu