August 12 2014 Complete Agenda

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

WORK SESSION Tuesday, August 12, 2014 – 1:00 PM

A Closed Session is scheduled from 10:30 AM – 1:00 PM to discuss legal and personnel matters.

AGENDA

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION – Tuesday, August 12, 2014 – 10:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.

3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND RECOGNITIONS

4. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Any person who may wish to speak on a matter scheduled for discussion on the Work Session Agenda

may be heard during Comments from the Public for a period of three (3) minutes or such time as may be deemed appropriate by the Council President. Anyone wishing to be heard shall state their name,

address and the Agenda item on which he or she wishes to speak.

5. NEW BUSINESS

A. Pension Valuation Report presented by Ed Koebel, Cavanaugh Macdonald Consulting, LLC

B. Discussion of Town Equipment and Labor Policy with Fee Guidelines presented by Special Event Superintendent

C. Request to Sole Source Purchase Aeration System for 100th Street Water Tank presented by Public Works Chief Deputy Director

D. Discussion of Runway 14/32 Pavement Maintenance presented by Public Works Director

E. Discussion of Runway 02 Obstruction Removal presented by Public Works Director

F. Request to Approve Stone Aggregate for Commercial Parking Area presented by Environmental Engineer

G. Request to Approval Purchase of Fire Station Appliances and Bunk Room Furniture presented by City Engineer

H. Capital Improvement Plan Update presented by City Engineer

I. Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction of Single‐lane Boat Ramp presented by City Engineer

6. ADJOURN

WORK SESSION -MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 2014

2. Report on Closed Session – August 12, 2014 – 10:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. – Legal and Personnel Matters

NOTICE OF CLOSED SESSION OF MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF OCEAN CITY

AUTHORITY: State Government Article: Section 10-508(a) Annotated Code of Maryland PURPOSES:

X

1. To discuss: (i) the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion,

compensation, removal, resignation or performance evaluation of appointees, employees or officials over whom it has jurisdiction; or

(ii) any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals;

2. To protect the privacy or reputation of individuals with respect to a matter that is not related to public business

3. To consider the acquisition of real property for the public purpose and matters directly related thereto;

4. Consider a matter that concerns the proposal for a business or industrial organization to locate, expand or locate in the state;

5. Consider the investment of public funds; 6. Consider the marketing of public securities;

X 7. Consult with counsel to obtain legal advice;

8. Consult with staff, consultants or other individuals about pending or potential litigations;

9. Conduct collective bargaining negotiations or consider matters that relate to the negotiations;

10. Discuss public security if the public body determines that public discussion would constitute a risk to the public or public security, including;

a) the deployment of fire and police services and staff; and b) the development and implementation of emergency plans 11. Prepare, administer or grade a scholastic, licensing or qualifying examination;

12. Conduct or discuss an investigative proceeding on actual or possible criminal conduct;

13. Comply with a specific constitutional, statutory or judicially imposed

requirement that prevents public disclosures about a particular proceeding or matter; or

14. Before a contract is awarded or bids are opened, discuss a matter directly related to a negotiation strategy or the contents of a bid or proposal, if public discussion or disclosure would adversely impact the ability of the public body to participate in the competitive bidding or proposal process

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:30 a.m. PLACE: City Hall SUBJECT: Legal and Personnel Matters VOTE: UNANIMOUS OTHER: FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF OCEAN CITY

Prior to the open session of the Mayor and City Council being held on Tuesday,

August 12, 2014, a closed session was held on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 at 10:30

a.m. The following is a report of the closed session.

1. A statement of the time, place, and purpose of the closed session is attached.

2. A record of the vote of each member as to closing the session is attached.

3. A citation of the authority under the law for closing the session is attached.

4. (a) Topics of Discussion: Legal and Personnel Matters

(b) Persons present:

Mayor Richard Meehan City Manager David Recor Council President Lloyd Martin Council Secretary Mary Knight Council Members Doug Cymek; Margaret Pillas; Brent Ashley; Dennis Dare and

Joe Mitrecic City Solicitor Guy Ayres Executive Office Associate Diana Chavis

Action(s) taken:

Motion to close meeting:

Time adjourned:


4. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Any person who may wish to speak on a matter scheduled for discussion on the Work

Session Agenda may be heard during Comments from the Public for a period of three (3) minutes or such time as may be deemed appropriate by the Council President. Anyone wishing to be heard shall state their name, address and the subject on which he or she wishes to speak.


5. NEW BUSINESS

A. Pension Valuation Report presented by Ed Koebel, Cavanaugh Macdonald Consulting, LLC

TOWN OF

The White Marlin Capital of the World

TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Wayne Evans, Human Resources Director

Martha Bennett, Finance Administrator RE: Actuarial Valuation of Defined Benefit Pension Plans DATE: August 1, 2014

ISSUE(S): Report of the Actuary on Annual Valuation as of April 1, 2014. Presented by Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA, Cavanaugh Macdonald

Consulting, LLC.

SUMMARY: Due to actuarial gains, pension plan funded ratio increased from 78.4% to 85.8% for the public safety employees plan and from 85.2% to 90.7% for the general employees plan.

FISCAL IMPACT: Annual recommended employer contribution for FY15 is

$1,057,783 less than the FY14 employer contribution. RECOMMENDATION: Approve contribution to Pension Plans for FY15 at actuarially

recommended contribution of $4,624,891 per Town funding policies and approval of Pension Trustees at their meeting August 6, 2014. (Note: budget amount $5,954,154). Approve contribution to Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) Trust at budgeted amount of $3,083,000 per actuarial valuation prepared by Bolton Partners on May 2, 2014.

Financially Sound Town Government

ALTERNATIVES: Do not fund pension plans or retiree health (OPEB) plan at

recommended contribution amounts. RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Martha Bennett, Finance Administrator

Wayne Evans, Human Resources Director COORDINATED WITH: Pension Plan Trustees ATTACHMENT(S): PowerPoint presentation prepared by Ed Koebel

Agenda Item # 5A

Council Meeting August 12, 2014

Ocean City Valuation Results

April 1, 2014

The Employees of Ocean City, Maryland

Pension Plan

Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA – Principal and Consulting Actuary

2

Plan Census Data – April 1

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Actives 397 368 324 301 289 277

Retirees 99 107 140 150 155 165

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

3

Annual Compensation & Benefits – April 1 (thousands)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Compenation $20,595 $19,517 $17,316 $16,162 $15,371 $15,074

Benefits $717 $932 $1,739 $1,908 $2,081 $2,327

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

4

Funding Valuation Process

Present Value of Future Benefits

(PVFB)

Actuarial Accrued

Liability (AAL)

Future Normal Costs

(NC)

Assets

(AVA, MVA)

Unfunded

Accrued

Liability (UAL)

Member

Portion

(5.00%)

Employer

Portion

5

Present Value of Future Benefits ($ thousands)

Total - $68,111.1

Age & Service

$63,141.4

Death $2,988.4

Disability $125.0

Separation $1,856.3

6

Plan Total Accrued Liability ($ thousands)

Inactive

Retiree

Active

Total

$0.0

$20,000.0

$40,000.0

$60,000.0

4/1/2012 4/1/2013 4/1/2014

Inactive $1,047.7 $951.3 $877.9

Retiree $18,396.4 $20,046.4 $22,357.8

Active $29,455.1 $29,747.4 $30,379.5

Total $48,899.2 $50,745.1 $53,615.2

7

Plan Cash Flow

-10,000

-8,000

-6,000

-4,000

-2,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$ T

ho

usa

nd

s

Benefit Payments Contributions Investment Income

8

History of Plan Asset Values

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

$ T

ho

usa

nd

s

Market Actuarial

9

Unfunded Accrued Liability ($ thousands)

April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Actuarial Accrued Liability

$53,615.2

$50,745.1

2. Actuarial Value of Assets

48,624.1

43,230.4

3. Unfunded Accrued Liability

(1. - 2.)

$4,991.1

$7,514.7

4. Funded Ratio (2. ÷ 1.)

90.7%

85.2%

10

Amortization of

Unfunded Accrued Liability

Date

Established

Description

Initial

Amortization

Period

Initial

Amount

Remaining

Amount on

4/1/2013 Payment/

(Credit)

4/1/2014 Transitional UAAL 10 $4,991,119 $ 4,991,119 $ 676,405

$ 4,991,119 $ 676,405

11

Plan Actuarial Gain/Loss Analysis ($ thousands)

$379.3

$0.0

$33.5

($400.9)

$0.0

$61.1

$610.7

$1,212.1

Other

Transfers

Withdrawal

Mortality

Disability Retirement

Service Retirement

Salary Increases

Investment Return

Losses Gains Source

12

Plan Contribution Results ($ thousands)

April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Normal Cost

$1,966.6

$1,911.0

2. UAL Contribution

676.4

1,098.1

3. Total Required Contribution

2,643.0

3,009.1

4. Interest to Middle of Year

147.3

110.8

5. Participant Contributions

753.7

768.5

6. Employer (ER) Contribution

(3. + 4. – 5.)

$2,036.6

$2,351.4

7. ER Contribution as Rate of Pay

13.5%

15.3%

Ocean City Valuation Results

April 1, 2014

Ocean City, Maryland Public Safety Employees

Pension Plan

Ed Koebel, EA, FCA, MAAA – Principal and Consulting Actuary

14

Changes in Plan

The Plan was reopened effective July 1, 2013 for

new entrants hired on or after April 1, 2011.

15

Plan Census Data – April 1

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Actives 179 177 165 150 140 157

Retirees 31 32 43 53 57 64

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

16

Annual Compensation & Benefits – April 1 (thousands)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Compenation $12,065 $12,119 $11,261 $10,249 $9,691 $10,541

Benefits $969 $1,008 $1,509 $2,028 $2,289 $2,588

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

17

Present Value of Future Benefits ($ thousands)

Total - $76,252.9

Age & Service

$74,632.9

Death $401.3

Disability $0.0

Separation $1,218.7

18

Plan Total Accrued Liability ($ thousands)

Inactive

Retiree

Active

Total

$0.0

$20,000.0

$40,000.0

$60,000.0

4/1/2012 4/1/2013 4/1/2014

Inactive $250.3 $226.0 $201.8

Retiree $22,078.7 $24,757.8 $28,074.2

Active $29,597.4 $29,733.7 $28,957.5

Total $51,926.4 $54,717.5 $57,233.5

19

Plan Cash Flow

-10,000

-8,000

-6,000

-4,000

-2,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$ T

ho

usa

nd

s

Benefit Payments Contributions Investment Income

20

History of Plan Asset Values

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

$ T

ho

usa

nd

s

Market Actuarial

21

Unfunded Accrued Liability ($ thousands)

April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Actuarial Accrued Liability

$57,233.5

$54,717.5

2. Actuarial Value of Assets

49,128.2

42,873.8

3. Unfunded Accrued Liability

(1. - 2.)

$8,105.3

$11,843.7

4. Funded Ratio (2. ÷ 1.)

85.8%

78.4%

22

Amortization of

Unfunded Accrued Liability

Date

Established

Description

Initial

Amortization

Period

Initial

Amount

Remaining

Amount on

4/1/2013 Payment/

(Credit)

4/1/2014 Transitional UAAL 10 $8,105,273 $ 8,105,273 $ 1,098,441

$ 8,105,273 $1,098,441

23

Plan Actuarial Gain/Loss Analysis ($ thousands)

$228.9

$0.0

$0.0

$201.3

($125.3)

$0.0

$155.7

$822.4

$1,177.0

Other

Non-Recurring

Transfers

Withdrawal

Mortality

Disability Retirement

Service Retirement

Salary Increases

Investment Return

Losses Gains Source

24

Plan Contribution Results ($ thousands)

April 1, 2014 April 1, 2013

1. Normal Cost

$2,151.9

$1,922.3

2. UAL Contribution

1,098.4

2,038.5

3. Total Required Contribution

3,250.3

3,960.8

4. Interest to Middle of Year

181.2

145.8

5. Participant Contributions

843.3

775.3

6. Employer (ER) Contribution

(3. + 4. – 5.)

$2,588.2

$3,331.3

7. ER Contribution as Rate of Pay

24.6%

34.4%


5. NEW BUSINESS

B. Discussion of Town Equipment and Labor Policy with Fee Guidelines presented by Special Events Superintendent

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Frank C. Miller, Special Events Director RE: Events Policy including Labor and Equipment Guidelines DATE: August 6, 2014

ISSUE(S): Revisions to PPM 600-4, Events Permit Requests SUMMARY: PPM 600-4 categorizes all events as Special Events when, in fact,

special events is just one of several event categories the Town hosts annually. Along with the need to redefine events, there is a distinct need to layout policy guidelines and costs associated with the use of Town labor and equipment. In the last two years, the number of events held in the Town has more than doubled. Town support services are now being spread thin between normal duties and special event needs. This is the catalyst for discussion to track and charge for use of Town labor and equipment. Processes to vet upcoming events need to be defined in our policy and labor and equipment costs tallied, so the Town may see the price of hosting events. We may, in turn, choose to convey costs to the promoter for services rendered.

FISCAL IMPACT: Increased revenue related to private events to offset costs incurred

where applicable. Potential reduction in number of private events. RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised Policy and Fee structure with planned

implementation date of January 1, 2015.

1st Class Resort and Tourist Destination

ALTERNATIVES: Do nothing at this time or recommend modifications toward a

successful variation of the policy and pricing. RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Frank Miller, Special Events Director COORDINATED WITH: Recreation and Parks Committee

Hal Adkins, Public Works Director John Vanfossen, Public Works Deputy Director Thomas Dy, Public Works Maintenance Manager

ATTACHMENT(S): Revised PPM, fee costs and new Town Asset Request (TAR) form.

Agenda Item #


7/15/14 PrivateEventPolicyandFeeResolution Page1

ItisrecommendedtoapplythefollowingchangestoPPM600‐4oftheTownofOceanCityPolicyandProcedureManualasnotedbyunderlinedtype.

TOWN OF OCEAN CITY OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND

POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

SECTION: Operations

PPM 600-4 SUBJECT: Events Permit Requests

________________________________________________________________

An Event is any gathering, parade or event held on any public street, roadway, beach, parking lot, Boardwalk or sidewalk within the corporate limits or on any other municipal property of the Town of Ocean City, Maryland. Events shall further be defined as follows: Special Event (TYPE A) - any Town event produced under budgeted Town funds with the intent to increase tourism and executed and managed by the Town’s Special Events Division. Private Event (TYPE B) – Any event in the Town of Ocean City produced by an independent entity/promoter (for-profit or non-profit) utilizing public/town-owned and/or managed property in whole or in part as a venue for said event. This includes events held at the Ocean City Convention Center (OCCC) and events booked through the Recreation and Parks Department (R&P) field and facility booking process. Value-Added Event (TYPE C) – Any Town-owned event produced using budgeted or appropriated Town funds with the intent to provide entertainment to the existing residents or crowd-base and managed by the Special Events Division solely or in conjunction with outside entities/promoters. Marketing Activation (TYPE D) – Any temporary stand-alone promotional effort in the Town of Ocean City on public property produced by an independent entity with the intent to promote a brand of products or services to Residents or Ocean City’s crowd-base through professional interaction and product sampling with no exchange of money or bartering. Private Event, Non-Town Venue (TYPE E) – Any event held solely on non-public/non-Town-owned property utilizing Town equipment or services. Non-Promoter Event, Private Equipment Use (TYPE F) – Any use of Town-owned equipment or Town services for events or needs not related to the public or crowd-base and not intended to produce income.

DChavis

Highlight


Public Relations Event (TYPE G) – An activity within the Town of Ocean City that promotes the Town, assets unique to the Town and/or its family-friendly environment and culture; whereas said activity is more robust than a Marketing Activation and/or originated from a Town-induced solicitation or need. Localized Residential Event (TYPE H) – A residential event hosted by residents within close proximity to the resident’s property or residents’ properties whereas no official booking process exists and whereby a formal written request has been received by requestor to modify public traffic patterns within the immediate area. Requestor does not utilize said event to produce revenue. Example of this type includes but is not limited to block parties and holiday tours where street(s) may be shut down for pedestrian traffic.

Event Types B-D shall require a Private Event Permit to execute any and all

efforts requested. The opportunity to be granted a Private Event Permit is a privilege the Town of Ocean City may confer on an applicant for use of property and/or assets for an event. Private Events are permitted when they serve the community at large, not just the applicant. Please refer to PPM 600-6 for use of municipal parks.

Event Types E-H shall have a Town of Ocean City Asset Request form

completed internally by the Private Events Coordinator for request dissemination to proper departments for review and comment. Requests for these event types to modify traffic or parking require review and approval by the Ocean City Police Commission.

All Private Event applicants are required to file a "Private Events Application" with the Private Events Coordinator at least 90 days prior to the requested event but no sooner than one year prior to the requested start date. Applicants who are requesting the use of City Park property should contact the Recreation and Parks Department for reservation approval prior to submitting a private event application. The reservation shall become part of the private event application submission and be subject to City approval. Similarly, applicants who are requesting the use of Ocean City Convention Center property should contact the Convention Center Sales Department for reservation approval prior to submitting a private event application. The reservation shall become part of the private event application submission and be subject to City approval. Events solely held at OCCC or solely using a R&P facility/field do not need to be vetted through the Private Event Application Process unless they include use of TOC labor and assets outside of OCCC or R&P property respectively.

The Mayor and City Council shall consider applications for Private Events at their regularly scheduled Council Meetings, and a decision will be made at that time to permit or not permit said event, establish conditions and act on Town equipment and Town labor requests and other requirements. Date Only approval may be applied for two years prior for events previously approved by the Mayor and City Council. However, approved dates must comply with the normal application process or the date will be forfeited. City-produced Special Events (Type A) and Town projects take


precedence over all other scheduled events and may supersede any scheduled event at any time.

The applicant must complete a separate application for each event scheduled on a separate date/weekend (e.g. “event A” executed as a series on separated weekends/dates may not be identified on one application). A new application must be submitted annually for recurring events. Applicants must complete and sign the Hold Harmless Clause and all other disclaimers attached to the application. Insurance coverage shall be occurrence form comprehensive general liability of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000), combined single limit coverage with the Mayor and City Council named as additional insured. A copy of the insurance certificate will be kept on file in the Risk Management office and with the Special Events Application.

Once the application is received by the Private Events Coordinator, it will be routed to appropriate city departments for review, comment and pricing. A coordination meeting may be required including the applicant and members of the City Staff prior to submission to the Mayor and City Council for action. The Private Events Coordinator will receive all staff reviews costs and recommended charges and will adjudicate any issues arising from the reviews with the applicant. Local Non-Profit Organizations whom maintain primary offices within Worcester County shall be eligible for up to a 75% discount on labor and equipment charges. The discount(s) shall be applied upon approval by Mayor and City Council. The Private Events Coordinator shall review pre-discount costs and recommended charges with Applicant if Applicant meets the above criteria. Once all issues are resolved, the Private Events Coordinator will contact the applicant to schedule a mutually agreeable date for the City Council agenda. The Private Events Coordinator will request the City Manager's office place the item on the appropriate agenda for consideration. A copy of the completed Private Events Application, pending charges and staff review/costs/comments will be forwarded to the City Manager's office for inclusion in the agenda packet. Final costs and recommended charges shall be reviewed and are subject to modification by Mayor and City Council prior to approval. Mayor and City Council approved charges shall be reimbursed to the Town of Ocean City by Applicant.

The applicant or a representative shall appear at the Council Meeting to make

the formal request. City Council shall look favorably at applications produced and managed by local County charity organizations. Upon approval or denial, the Private Events Coordinator shall convey the results to Town staff, along with any changes, conditions, or fees/charges placed upon the permitted use. Approved applications will receive a Private Event Permit from the Town of Ocean City. Said permit shall be prominently displayed at the event site.

The Town of Ocean City shall have the right to review and enforce all

requirements, conditions, policies, ordinances and laws during execution of said event. Additional fees may be assessed if execution of said event falls outside the event description, requirements, conditions and limitations as approved by Mayor and


City Council and/or if additional costs are incurred by Town to return the event venue or Town hardware and assets to their condition prior to use by event.

Town equipment and labor costs will be set by resolution and are subject to

change from time to time as approved by the Mayor and City Council. [endofpolicyrevision]


FeeResolution:ItisrecommendedtoapplythefollowingchargesforTownEquipmentandLaborrelatedtoTypeB–FEventsasdefinedintherevisedPolicy.Chargesshallbeimplementedatthestartofthenewcalendaryear–January1,2015.Assetavailabilityandfeessubjecttochangewithoutnotice.

Equipment Charge Ea.

Barricade (Type 1) Wooden ‐ A (/day) $ 3.00

Barricade (Type 2) SE, Aluminum (/day) $ 5.00

Barricade (Type 3) Wooden ‐Long (/day) $ 4.00

Barricade (Type 4) Traffic, Plastic (/day) $ 4.00

Traffic Cone (/day) $ 2.00

Sand Fence/Stakes (linear foot) (/day) $ 3.00

55 Gln Trash Container (/day) $ 5.00

300 Gln Trash Container (/day) $ 50.00

8 Yard Dumpster (/day) $ 125.00

30 Yard Dumpster (/day) $ 250.00

55 Gln Trash Liners (per box) $ 25.00

Electronic Mobile Message Board (/hr) $ 50.00

Arrow Board (/hr) $ 25.00

Mobile Light Cart (/hr) $ 30.00

Caution Tape $ 25.00

110 Volt Service (20Amps) (/connect) $ 84.00

208 Volt Single Phase (30Amps) (/connect) $ 112.00

208 Volt 3‐Phase (30 Amps) (/connect) $ 126.00



Electric Cable ‐ Extension (/cable) $ 10.00

Electric Cable ‐ Outlet Terminal (/cable) $ 18.00

25' Electric Cable w/Quad Box $ 35.00

Gas Line with Regulator (/ft) $ 75.00

Water Line/Hose (/ 50' hose) $ 35.00

Portable Stage 24x40 (/day) $ 350.00

4x4 Stage Platform Section (/day) $ 20.00

Portable Judges Stand (/day) $ 125.00

Small Mobile Bleachers (/day) $ 100.00

Large Mobile Bleachers (/day) $ 250.00

Beach Tractor ‐ Trailer (/day) $ 300.00

Premium PA System (/hr) $ 25.00

Basic PA System (/hr) $ 20.00


Equipment Charge Ea.

Podium (per hour) $ 10.00

Round Table $ 10.00

[Non‐Owned Equip. Storage] (/pc/day) $ 8.00

10x10 EZ Up Tent (/day) $ 150.00

Portable PA System, W/L Mic (/day) $ 500.00

Ticket Booth (per use) $ 2,500.00

Gazebo (per use) $ 2,500.00

Springfest Entrance Unit (per use) $ 650.00

Entertainment Tent Chair (/day) $ 3.00

Picnic Table (per day) $ 25.00

Meeting Folding Chair (NSP venue) $ 5.00

6' Table (undraped, NSP venue) $ 16.00

Life Guard Stand (/day) $ 100.00

Table (draped) 24"x4' $ 94.00


Table (draped) 24"x 6' $ 101.00


Table (Undraped) 24"x4' $ 16.00




Chair $ 5.00

Easel $ 21.00

Flip Chart $ 63.00

Pipe and Drape (per section) $ 65.00

Pipe and Drape (short) $ 54.00

Rope and Stancion (per 6') $ 40.00

110 Volt Service (20Amps) $ 126.00

208 Volt Single Phase (30Amps) $ 168.00

208 Volt 3‐Phase (30 Amps) $ 188.00

208 Volt 3‐Phase (60 Amps) $ 229.00

208 Volt 3‐Phase (100 Amps) $ 378.00

ACTIVE HARDWARE/EQUIPMENT

Department of Public Works Std. Hourly OT Hourly

Beach Tractor/Operator $ 86.06 $ 129.09 Forklift/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Pick‐up Truck/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Bucket Truck/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Bobcat/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11


Department of Public Works Std. Hourly OT Hourly

Flatbed Truck/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Flatbed Truck/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Tractor Trailer Truck $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Lg Street Cleaner/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Sm Lot Cleaner/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Scissor Lift/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Man Lift/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Beach Can Disposal Unit/Op $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Garbage Truck/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Container Truck/Operator $ 42.21 $ 63.32 Beach Patrol ATV/Life Guard $ 41.07 $ 61.61 Wave Runner/Life Guard $ 41.07 $ 61.61 Stand/Life Guard $ 36.22 $ 54.33 Truck/Life Guard $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Transportation Department Shuttle/Operator $ 76.07 $ 114.11 Tram/Operator/Attendant $ 86.06 $ 129.09 Bus (Large)/Operator $ 86.06 $ 129.09 Bus (Small)/Operator $ 86.06 $ 129.09 Convention Center Forklift & Operator (Pre) $ 50.00 $ 75.00 Forklift & Operator (Event) $ 74.00 $ 111.00 LABOR POSITIONS Department of Public Works Maintenance Staff $ 27.21 $ 40.82 Plumber $ 27.21 $ 40.82 Electrician $ 36.06 $ 54.09 Construction Staff $ 27.21 $ 40.82 Engineering Staff $ 41.07 $ 61.61 Waste Management Staff $ 27.21 $ 40.82 Toll Booth Operator $ 27.21 $ 40.82 Supervisor $ 36.06 $ 54.09 Beach Patrol Life Guard $ 36.06 $ 54.09 Supervisor $ 36.06 $ 54.09 Convention Center General Labor/Manpower (Pre) $ 32.00 $ 48.00 General Labor/Manpower(Event) $ 48.00 $ 72.00 Rigging (Pre) $ 50.00 $ 75.00 Rigging(Event) $ 74.00 $ 111.00


SupportingComments&Guidelines

TownofOceanCityGuidelinesforTown‐OwnedEquipment&LaborUsagebyOutsideEntities

Theseguidelinesaredesignedtocreateanestablishedsystemoftrackingandapprovalprocesses,costing,datasharingandinventorymanagementmethods.ThesystemistobeutilizedbyallparticipatingdepartmentsanddivisionswithintheTownofOceanCity(TOC)asrelatedtoTownresources–hardequipmentassetsandlaborwhereresourcesareallocatedtoadefinedevent.Thisdocumentationwilladdresshowoutsideentitiessuchasfor‐profitandnon‐profitbusinesses,associations,individualsandotherTowndivisionsmayapplyforutilizationofTownresources,thedefinitionsbywhicheachTOCassetrequestshallbecategorized,thedocumentationandupdatingofTOCavailableassetinventory,theadaptationstothePrivateEventApplicationprocessandrelatedTownofOceanCityPolicy600‐4whereintheseproceduresshallresideandthedisclosureofresponsibilitiesandliabilitiesonbothsidesoftheprocess.DefinitionofEventTypes:(establishedinrecommendedpolicyrevision)DefinitionofProcedures:Anyentityorperson(s)interestedinutilizingTown‐ownedequipmentorservices(hereinafterreferredtoas“TOCAssets”)mustapplyforTOCAssetusethroughtheappropriateprocessmanagedbythePrivateEventsCoordinator.TypeAeventsfallundertheformalbudgetingapprovalprocessessetforthbytheTown.TypesB,CandDshallfollowthePrivateEventApplicationProcess.TypesEandFeventtypesaswellasdivision‐to‐divisionrequestsshallcompleteaTOCAssetRequestform(TAR)outsideofthePrivateEventProcess.“E”,“F”,“G”and“H”eventtypeTARformsareprocessedthroughthePrivateEventsCoordinatoroutsideofthePrivateEventApplicationProcess.Division‐to‐DivisionTARformsarecompletedbytherequestingentitywithotherproceduresasdescribedherein.ProcessedTARforms,onceapprovedthroughthePrivateEventApplicationprocessorsimplythroughdivisionapprovals(pendingprocesspathasdescribedabove)arerecordedelectronicallyintheappropriateshareddrive.TARformsarefiledelectronicallyusingthemonthanddateofstartofusageontheshareddrive.TARformsattachedtoeventsthroughthePrivateEventApplicationprocessarealsorecordedwithintheappropriateprivateeventfoldermanagedbythePrivateEventCoordinator.FormsmaybereviewedelectronicallyfromtheshareddrivebyTOCemployeesforreference,inventorying,ortoconfirmoverallallocationofTOCAssets.[EventuallythisdataSHOULDbetrackedviaaserver‐basedassetdatabase,considerthedatabaseafutureimplementation]


EmergencyandDisasterReliefneedssupersedetheseguidelinestoavertprocessingtime;although,usageshouldbetracked,oncetimeallows,tokeepaccurateinventoryandusageinformation.ReasonableNeedvs.CompetitiveUse:TheconditionunderwhichtheTOCassetisusedandoriginoftherequestplaysamajorroleindetermininghowpoliciesandguidelinesareapplied.CompleteinformationwillgenerallyleadtoapplyingthefollowingdefinitionstotheTOCAssetrequestjustifyingthepathofsupporttobeconsidered.Thedefinitionsareasfollows:ReasonableNeed‐TheTOCAssetrequestoriginatesfromwithintheTownofOceanCityasarequirementtomeetlocalmunicipalexpectationsorneedsortherequestisdeemedasajustifiedresponsibility(legalorotherwise)oftheTown,auniqueassetbelongingtoorinpossessionoftheTownortheTownforcespreferencethatsaidTOCassetistobeusedoverotherexternalassetsources.CompetitiveUse–IntenttousetheTOCAssetinanefforttoreplacesimilarassetsavailableexternallyatatrackablecosttorequestorortheTOCassetisnotaTOCnecessityorrequirementandisanenhancementthatccanbeduplicatedingeneralthroughanexternalprovider.TOCAssetCosting:AcostmustbeassociatedwiththeTOCAssetuseregardlessofhowtheusehasbeendefined.Costsshallbeusedtotrack“InvestmentbyTown”,“InternalJobCost”and/ortoward“FeesincurredbyRequestor”.Thesecostsshallbeestimatedbytheoriginatingdepartment,approvedbytheMayorandCityCouncilanduniformlyappliedforeventneedsTown‐wide.CostsmaydifferfromthoseappliedtootherneedssuchasdisasterreliefandGovernmenttoGovernmentinvoicing.Costsshallbesimpleinstructurewhenintheformofpublicinformationandmaybefurtherbrokendowninternallyforbudgeting.HowCostsareApplied:Theinformationbelowisrelatedtotheapplicationofcosts,notwhetherornotthecostsarebillablebacktotheevent.TOCHardwareAssetsinherentlyhaveacostassociatedwiththem.TheTownrealizesexpensesforhardwarefromequipmentpurchaseorassetcreationandfromrawmaterials,maintenance,storage,depreciationandtransportation.AcostneedstobeassociatedwitheachAssettocoverthevalueofuseanddurationoftheitem’suse.


IntermsofTOCLaborAssetsorServices,therearetwoschoolsofthought.Firstisifstaffisplacedonajobrelatedtoanevent,thatlaborcostshouldbereflectedasaneventcost.Useofstafffortaskingoutsideoftheposition’s“normalduties”resultsinadelayincompletingthosenormaldutiesthereforethecostisspecifictotheevent.Thesecondperspectiveisifthestaffisassignedduringregularlyscheduledhourscompletingworkwithintheirscopeofexpertiseforwhichtheywerehiredandthejobdoesnotincurovertime,thereisnoneedtopushtherelatedcosttotheevent.Ifthelaborisassignedduringhoursnotregularlyscheduled,thenthehoursarejustifiedforbilling.UseofTownvehiclesandequipmentrequiringanoperatorinherentlyhasacombinecostforequipmentuseandlaborcoststooperatesaidequipment.ForthepurposeofshowingacostfortheseoperatedTownassets,theassetshaveoneasinglehourlyratetocoverthepackageofhardwareandlabor.UseofTOCEquipmentandLaborforneedsrelatedtoEventTypesAandCalsohaveconditionswhenitcomestomethodofapplication.SincetheseeventtypesareproducedbytheTownusingTownfundsastheprimaryfinancingsourceandundertheTown’sbudget,shortdurationneedsandlow‐volumeneedsbytheTownfromexistingTownassetsshallnotbebilledoutbythesupplyingdepartment.Longdurationneedsandhigh‐volumeneedsmaybebilledouttotheeventthroughandatthediscretionoftheTown’sBudgetManagerupontherequestofthesourceDepartmentorDivision.Atalltimes,laborandequipmentusageshallbetrackedbythesourcedepartmentandcommunicatedtothedepartmentordivisionproducingtheeventuponcompletionofneeds.AssetsforTowneventsshouldnotbebilledastheassetsalreadybelongtotheTownforusebytheTown.ForEventTypesBandE,allplannedoranticipatedusageofTownEquipmentandLaborshouldbescheduledwithanattachedcost.ThesecostswillbecommunicatedthroughthePrivateEventApplicationprocesstotheMayorandCityCouncilforreviewandconsideration.MayorandCityCouncil(M&CC)havetherightto,withalldepartmentcommentsconsidered,choosewhatcostsifanyshallberemovedasanexpensetoanevent.Theapplicationofwhetherassetsareinplaceforareasonableneedorcompetitiveuseshouldbeconsideredatthistime.Thestandardpracticewillbetoinvoicetheeventbillingcontactforapprovedchargesunlessotherwisedirected.EventTypesB,CandDshallnotbeapprovedbytheMayorandCityCouncilwithoutallDepartmentcommentsreceivedandtheformalsubmissionthereoftotheMayorandCityCouncilbytheTown’sPrivateEventCoordinator.ThesecommentsandjobcostingfiguresalongwithothereventdetailsarevitalinallEventconsiderations.For‐Profitvs.Non‐ProfitFor‐ProfitandNon‐ProfitentitiesshallreceivethesameconsiderationandcoststructureascostsincurredbytheTowndonotchangefortypeofpromoter.TheMayorandCityCouncilshalllookfavorablyuponPrivateEventApplicationssubmittedforeventsorganizedandmanagedbynon‐profitorganizationswithestablishedoffices


withinWorcesterCounty.Aforementionednon‐profitapplicationsshallreceivea75%discountonapplicationandspaceusefeesupontheapprovalofMayorandCityCouncil.In‐Seasonvs.Shoulder‐SeasonAmorevitalconditiontobeconsideredbyM&CCwhendeterminingviablebillableexpensesistimeofyeareventistobeexecuted,TOCstaffingdemandsforthedatesoftheeventinquestionandavailabilityofTOCAssetsrequested.Formanagementoftheprocessesandassetsasdescribedherein,FIVESEASONSshallbedefined:WINTERSEASON– January2nd–March15th

(lowdemand,lowstaffing)SPRINGSEASON– March16th–StartofMemorialDayWeekend

(mediumdemand,mediumstaffing)SUMMERSEASON–StartofMemorialDayWeekend–LaborDay

(highdemand,maxstaffing)FALLSEASON– LaborDay–October31st

(mediumdemand,mediumstaffing)HOLIDAYSEASON–November1st–January1st

(mediumdemand,lowstaffing)SeasonscorrelatetonotonlysaturationofprivateeventsbutalsotoavailabilityofTownstaffandequipmentforvitalandfundamentalannualjobduties,activitiesandexpectationsrequiredbyTownDepartmentsduringthatsametimeframe.TheseotherresponsibilitiesplayakeyroleintheTown’sabilitytocompletenon‐standardadd‐ontasksrequestedtosupportPrivateEvents.Impactvs.InvestmentAnimportantargumentwhenreviewingrequesteduseofTownassets(laborandequipment)isimpactontheTownversustherequiredinvestmentbytheTown.Impactincludesvariablessuchaslodgingroomnightsgainedsolelybytheeventtakingplace(positive),mediaexposuregenerated(positive),anticipatedconsumptionofgoodsandentertainmentwithintheTownbyeventattendees(positive),generalparkingdepletion(negative),displacementofnormalusageamenitiessuchassquarefootageofpublicbeachconsumedbyaneventnormallyusedbygeneraltourists(negative),andcorrelationtoTown’svaluesandreputation(variable)amongothers.Investmentisdefinedbytheamountofresources(financialandphysical)requiredbytheeventfromtheTowntosuccessfullyexecutesaidevent.Financialinvestmentscantakeontwoiterations:(1)TocoverthecostofassetsnecessaryforthesafetyofTownpatrons,elementsdeemedexecutablebytheTownonlyorasaproprietaryexecutableneed;or(2)asamonetaryrequestsuchasseedfunding,marketingsupport,ordonationoflaborandequipment.ThelatterrelatesbacktothesubjectofReasonableNeedvs.CompetitiveUse.


PaymentstoTownforAssetsUsed:UponcostapprovalbyMayorandCityCouncilforanevent;costsshallbeconveyedtoeventpromoterforreviewandacceptance.Approvalofcostsshallbeduenolaterthan30dayspriortoeventorwithinthreebusinessdaysofM&CCapproval.Uponfinalacceptanceofcoststobeincurredbyevent.Apaymentstructureshallbeenactedwiththefollowing:

‐ 50%ofallequipmentderivedcostsdueattimeofapproval‐ 75%ofalllaborderivedcostsdueattimeofapproval‐ Balancedue5businessdayspriortostartofevent‐ RentedequipmentinsurancepolicyinplaceforallTOCprovidedequipmentwith

Mayor&CityCouncil,TownofOceanCity,MDasadditionalinsured.

EVENTSWITHMOU‐ PaymentscheduletobeestablishedwithinMOU‐ RentedequipmentinsurancepolicyinplaceforallTOCprovidedequipmentwith

Mayor&CityCouncil,TownofOceanCity,MDasadditionalinsured.Failuretopayaspertheappropriatepaymentstructureplacestheeventatriskoflosingservicesand/orTownassets.EquipmentTrackingThePrivateEventCoordinatorundertheSpecialEventsDivisionshalltrackallequipmentscheduledforuseandapprovedbyM&CCandtheeventpromoter.Eachdepartment/divisionallocatingequipmentand/orlaborshallalsotrackassetssourcedbytheirdepartmenttoagiveneventusingthesamedatasheet.Lastminuteadditionsneedtobeaddedonbothsidesofallocationforauditingasnecessary.


TownofOceanCity,Maryland Sample Rev.071514EventSupportDocument

TOWNASSETREQUESTFORM

AllTown‐ownedequipmentrequestedforusebyanEventorthirdpartyshallberequestedherein.Equipmentandlaborneedsnotlistedonthisformwillnotbe

consideredforavailabilityorusebyeventorparty.

ITEM QTY USEDESC

DATEIN

TIMEIN

DATEOUT

TIMEOUT

TOCCOST

EventName:_________________________________ LoadIn:Date(s):____________________ContactName:_______________________________ EventDate(s):_______________________ContactPhone:______________________________ LoadOutDate(s):___________________Email:________________________________________ Location:_____________________________


5. NEW BUSINESS

C. Request to Sole Source Purchase Aeration System for 100th Street Water Tank presented by Public Works Chief Deputy Director

25166 TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Jim Parsons, Public Works Chief Deputy Director RE: Sole Source Purchase of Aeration System for 100th Street Water Tank DATE: August 12, 2014

ISSUE(S): An aeration system is needed in the 100th Street water tank in order to comply with MDE water quality requirements.

SUMMARY: An engineering evaluation was performed by the Town’s

consultant and two types of aeration system were identified as being appropriate for the 100th Street water tank. One type involves the installation of mechanical equipment inside of the water tank, and the other features mechanical equipment that is located outside of the tank. The engineering evaluation located only two vendors whom are prominent in the manufacture and installation of in-tank aeration systems for potable water tanks. One vendor offers both the interior and exterior equipment options; the other vendor offers only the interior equipment option. After careful consideration and a field visit to view a similar installation at a large facility in the Washington DC metropolitan area, the system that keeps the equipment outside of the tank is the design that is recommended by staff. Therefore, this item is a sole source purchase.

FISCAL IMPACT: $301,290.00

This is a planned expenditure for FY15 and funding is present in the FY15 Water Department budget.

RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the purchase and installation of the USCI/PAX system

as detailed in the proposal from Utility Service Company Inc.

Excellent Service through a High Performing Town Organization

ALTERNATIVES: None as this system is necessary to maintain compliance with

MDE requirements. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Jim Parsons, Public Works Chief Deputy Director

COORDINATED WITH: Hal Adkins, Public Works Director Howard Iman, Water Superintendent

Dean Dashiell, Senior Project Engineer

ATTACHMENT(S): Proposal from Utility Service Company, Inc.

Agenda Item # 5C



5. NEW BUSINESS

D. Discussion of Runway 14/32 Pavement Maintenance presented by Public Works Director

25166

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director RE: Pavement Maintenance – Runway 14/32 DATE: August 4, 2014

ISSUE(S): Pavement Maintenance Project Runway 14/32 (East/West Runway)

SUMMARY: Runway 14/32 was last resurfaced in the early 1980’s. The

current runway surface is in need of substantial maintenance repairs to assure its life expectancy until FY’17/18 when we hope to gain FAA/MAA Grant assistance for runway rehabilitation/reconstruction.

FISCAL IMPACT: The project budget is $100,000.00 and will be funded by a 75%

MAA Grant ($75,000) with a local match of 25% ($25,000) available from Airport Revenues.

RECOMMENDATION: Proceed with acceptance of Grant and scheduling of repairs this

fall via current unit price based contract with George and Lynch, Inc.


ALTERNATIVES: No alternatives suggested. Repairs are necessary to prevent

surface failure. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director

COORDINATED WITH: Jaime Giandomenico, Airport Manager Jennie Knapp, Budget Manager Ashish Solanki, MAA David Jones, P.E., Delta Aviation

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Scope of Work Statement

2) PCI – Pavement Condition Index 3) FY’15 MAA Special Grants Spreadsheet prepared by the MAA 4) Three current photos of Runway 14/32 cracks

Agenda Item # 5D



5. NEW BUSINESS

E. Discussion of Runway 02 Obstruction Removal presented by Public Works Director

25166

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director RE: Runway 02 – Obstruction Removal DATE: August 4, 2014

ISSUE(S): Obstruction (Tree) Removal Runway 02’s 20:1 Visual Approach Surface

SUMMARY: Numerous penetrations into Runway 02’s visual approach surface

have been identified by the FAA and must be removed in an effort to restore Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs).

FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded at a total value of $146,667 and supported

by a MAA Grant for 75% ($110,000) with a local match of 25% ($36,667) that consists of current local match allocations and supplemental Airport Revenues.

RECOMMENDATION: Proceed with acceptance of the Grant and bidding of the

Obstruction Removal efforts.


ALTERNATIVES: Continue with restricted use of the runway that reduces its

overall “utility”. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:

Hal O. Adkins, Public Works Director

COORDINATED WITH: Jaime Giandomenico, Airport Manager Jennie Knapp, Budget Manager Ashish Solanki, MAA David Jones, P.E., Delta Aviation

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Scope of Work

2) FY’15 MAA Grant Spreadsheet as prepared by Ashish Solanki 3) FAA – TERPS – 20:1 Visual Surface Evaluation Report dated

October 31, 2013 4) Map of Denoted Obstructions

Agenda Item # 5E

Council Meeting August 12 2014


5. NEW BUSINESS

F. Request to Approve Stone Aggregate for Commercial Parking Area presented by Environmental Engineer

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Gail Blazer Environmental Engineer RE: Request to approve alternative pervious surface for at Guido Burrito Restaurant DATE: July 25, 2014

ISSUE(S): Using stone aggregate for a commercial parking lot SUMMARY: Owner of Guido Burrito at 3303 Coastal Hwy requests the use of

GeoPave system with aggregate fill on the required parking lot. The property is limited on the stormwater management measures that would be feasible. Maintaining a pervious surface would negate the need for a structural measure. Per Parking Lot Paving Standards adopted by the Council, use of stone aggregate for a commercial lot requires City Council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable RECOMMENDATION: The Engineering Department does not oppose the use of the plastic

GeoPave system along with the aggregate because products like these provide for better traction on the stone, keep the stone contained and from compacting; while providing a pervious surface for infiltration. However, dust and loose stone debris are a concern.

Revitalized Ocean City: Development and Redevelopment

ALTERNATIVES: Require other pervious surface such as pervious pavers, asphalt or

concrete. Or, if a regular impervious surface is provided, more extensive stormwater management structures would be required.

RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Gail Blazer, Environmental Engineer

Terence McGean, City Engineer COORDINATED WITH: Chris Carbaugh, Atlantic Group (Consultant for owner) ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Site Plan of project

2) Geopave Design and Construction Brochure

Agenda Item # 5F


PRESTO

PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS 670 N PERKINS STREET, APPLETON, WISCONSIN, USA 54914 Ph: 920-738-1328 or 800-548-3424 ■ Fax: 920-738-1222 e-mail: [email protected] WWW.PRESTOGEO.COM/

GP-001 – FEB 2014

GEOPAVE® POROUS PAVEMENT SYSTEM

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 FEB 2014

Table of Contents The GeoPave® Porous Pavement System Components ........................................................................ 1

Figure 1 The GeoPave Porous Pavement System ................................................................................ 1

Function of the GeoPave System Components ........................................................................................ 1

Function of the GeoPave Unit ................................................................................................................ 1

Function of the Base Material ................................................................................................................ 1

Function of the Optional Geosynthetic Layer ........................................................................................ 1

Function of the Optional Sub-drain Component .................................................................................... 1

GeoPave Material Properties & Unit Dimensions ..................................................................................... 1

Table 1 GeoPave® Porous Pavement Unit ........................................................................................... 2

Figure 2 GeoPave Unit Nominal Dimensions ........................................................................................ 2

Figure 3 GeoPave Cell Configuration .................................................................................................... 2

Design Guideline ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Base Recommendations for the GeoPave® Unit .................................................................... 3

Infill Materials .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Aggregate Infill ........................................................................................................................................... 4

Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Infill .......................................................................................................... 4

Base Materials ............................................................................................................................................. 4

Aggregate Base ......................................................................................................................................... 4

Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Base .......................................................................................................................... 4

Key Porous Pavement System Characteristics ....................................................................................... 5

Elements Important to Structural Integrity ................................................................................................. 5

Figure 2 GeoPave System Dimensions and Layout .............................................................................. 6

Figure 3 GeoPave System Material Properties and Usage Guideline .................................................. 7

Installing the GeoPave System .................................................................................................................. 8

Subgrade Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 8

Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer .................................................................................................. 8

Optional Sub-Drainage Component .......................................................................................................... 8

Base Preparation ....................................................................................................................................... 8

GeoPave Unit Installation .......................................................................................................................... 8

Orientation & Laying Pattern of Units .................................................................................................... 8

Figure 4 Laying Patterns ........................................................................................................................ 8

Positioning of Units ................................................................................................................................ 9

Figure 5 Joining GeoPave Units ............................................................................................................ 9

Figure 6 The U-Clip Connection Device ................................................................................................................. 9

Optional Anchoring of Units ................................................................................................................... 9

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 FEB 2014

Figure 7 Optional Stake Anchoring ........................................................................................................ 9

Infilling the GeoPave Unit ........................................................................................................................ 10

Seed or Sod for Vegetated Systems ................................................................................................... 10

Delineation for Vegetated Systems ..................................................................................................... 10

Maintenance ............................................................................................................................................ 10

Estimating Time and Cost of Installation ............................................................................................... 11

Typical Crew Size and Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 11

Equipment Needed and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 11

Typical Construction Sequences and Times ........................................................................................... 11

Table 2 Approximate Quantities of Infill Material Required for GeoPave Unit .................................... 11

General Notes ......................................................................................................................................... 11

Total Time and Materials Required ......................................................................................................... 12

Total Cost of Time and Materials ............................................................................................................ 12

Limited Warranty ....................................................................................................................................... 13

Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................................. 13

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


PAGE 1 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 – FEB 2014

The GeoPave® Porous Pavement System Components

The GeoPave Porous Pavement System with aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil engineered infill provides a permeable, stabilized surface for vehicular and pedestrian load support.

The complete system has three major components:

(1) the GeoPave unit

(2) the porous aggregate or aggregate/topsoil engineered base, if required

(3) the porous aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil engineered infill.

Other components may include a geosynthetic separation / reinforcement layer between the subgrade and base materials and sub-drain components.

Natural Ground

GeoPave Unit

Aggregate Base(if required / depth varies)

Crushed AggregateInfill


Geotextile Underlayer(if required)

Natural Ground

GeoPave Unit

Aggregate Base(if required / depth varies)



Geotextile Underlayer(if required)

Figure 1 The GeoPave Porous Pavement System

Function of the GeoPave System Components

Function of the GeoPave Unit The function of the GeoPave unit is to 1) create a structural framework to stabilize open-graded aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil engineered infill and to 2) increase bearing strength for vehicular or pedestrian traffic loading requirements using porous aggregate or other structural infill.

Function of the Base Material For a given applied load over an existing sub base soil, both the base material, if required, and the GeoPave unit with crushed aggregate or a structural infill provide support. The depth of the base material should be determined using both loading requirements and sub base strength (Reference Table 1).

Function of the Optional Geosynthetic Layer Under some conditions, a geosynthetic layer may be a required component between the in-situ soil and the required base layer in the porous pavement system. Generally, the geosynthetic component will serve one or more of the following functions and be one or more of the following materials:

Tensile Reinforcement Geosynthetics: .... Separation Geosynthetics: ...................... Drainage / Separation Geosynthetics: .....

Woven geotextiles, Geogrids Non-woven geotextiles, Woven geotextiles Non-woven geotextiles, Geonet / geotextile separation / drainage materials

Function of the Optional Sub-drain Component If the porous pavement system is built over non-porous soils and an excavation is required such that water could be trapped, sub drainage becomes a required component of the system. Sub-drainage will remove harmful water accumulation that will cause degradation of the in-situ soils resulting in loss of support capacity. See Optional Sub-Drainage Component under Installing the GeoPave System for additional details.

GeoPave Material Properties & Unit Dimensions

GeoPave units shall be made from materials with physical and chemical characteristics described in Table 1. The manufactured GeoPave unit shall have a minimum deflection without breakage of 1.0 in (25 mm) when units are supported at 40 in (0.50 m) centers at 70°F (21°C). The color shall be uniform throughout all units in any given pallet.

GeoPave units shall have physical dimensions as specified in Table 1 and shown in Figure 2. GeoPave units shall contain a herringbone-type cell pattern consisting of small and large cells with a mesh bottom and vented side-walls. The monolithic mesh bottom is comprised of a series of square 0.25 in by 0.25 in (6.35 mm by 6.35 mm) openings. The small cells contain 1.0 in (25 mm) high and 0.50 in (12 mm) wide vented cell-wall openings, either 4 or 6 per cell for infill lock-up and lateral drainage between cells. The large cells contain vented cell-wall openings, 12 per cell.

The GeoPave units shall be connected with U-CLIPS side-to-side and end-to end where the short cell side-walls of adjacent units align. The connection points vary depending on chosen laying pattern (See Figure 8 Laying Patterns). End-to-end or side-to-side warping of the GeoPave unit shall not create a greater opening between adjacent outside walls than 0.25 in (6 mm). The finished GeoPave pavement is a uniformly connected, laterally integrated porous pavement system.

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 –FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 2 OF 13

Table 1 GeoPave® Porous Pavement Unit

Item Specification & Details Material Up to 97% Recycled Polyethylene *

Color Ranges Dark Shades Gray to Black

Chemical Resistance Superior

Carbon Black for Ultraviolet Light Stabilization 1.5% - 2.0%

Unit Minimum Crush Strength (Empty) @ 70°F (21°C) 175 psi (1,202 KPa)

Unit Minimum Crush Strength (Aggregate or Aggregate/Topsoil - Filled) @ 70°F (21°C)

1,000 psi (6,869 KPa)

Flexural Modulus @ 70°F (21°C) 35,000 psi (240,000 kPa)

Nominal Dimensions (width x length) 20 in x 40 in (0.5 m x 1.0 m)

Nominal Unit Depth 2.0 in (50 mm)

Nominal Coverage Area 5.3 ft² (0.5 m²)

Cells per Unit 50

Small Cell Size 3.25 in x 3.25 in (83 mm x 83 mm)

Large Cell Size 3.25 in x 6.5 in (83 mm x 165 mm)

Top Open Area per Unit 90.5%

Bottom Open Area per Unit 32.6%

Bottom Mesh Opening Size 0.25 in x 0.25 in (6.35 mm x 6.35 mm)

Weight per Unit (nominal) 8 lbs (3.6 kg)

Runoff Coefficient @ 2.5 in/hr (64 mm/hr) Rainfall with open-graded aggregate

(0-0.15)

Runoff Coefficient @ 2.5 in/hr (64 mm/hr) Rainfall with engineered infill

(0.10-0.35)

Units per Pallet 46

* The percentage of recycled content may vary depending on availability of recycled materials.

Dimensions and weight are subject to manufacturing tolerances and are influenced by recycled components.

End-to-end or side-to-side warp of the GeoPave unit shall not be greater than 0.5 in (6 mm).

Avoid specifications that state material compressive strength only. Material compressive strength, with applied factors of safety must be sufficient to resist compressive and lateral loads. In addition, ultra-high compressive strength adds little value to a porous pavement system.

Figure 2 GeoPave Unit Nominal Dimensions

Figure 3 GeoPave Cell Configuration

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


PAGE 3 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014– PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 –FEB 2014

Design Guideline

Table 2: Base Recommendations for the GeoPave® Unit

LOAD DESCRIPTION1

DEPTH OF BASE DEPTH OF BASE

AGGREGATE ENGINEERED AGGREGATE / TOPSOIL3

CBR2 2 – 4 CBR1 >4 CBR2 2 – 4 CBR2 >4

Heavy Fire Truck Access & H/HS-20 loading. Typical 110 psi (758 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings of 32 kips (145 kN), tandem axle loadings of 48 kip (220 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 80,000 lbs (36.3 MT).

6 in (150 mm)

6 in (150 mm)

Not Recommended

Not Recommended

Light Fire Truck Access & H/HS-15 loading. Typical 85 psi (586 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings of 24 kips (110 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 60,000 lb (27.2 MT).

6 in (150 mm)

4 in (100 mm)

Not Recommended

Not Recommended

Utility & Delivery Truck Access & H/HS-10 loading. Typical 60 psi (414 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings of 16 kips (75 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 40,000 lbs (18.1 MT).

4 in (100 mm)

2 in (50 mm)

4 in (100 mm)

2 in (50 mm)

Cars & Pick-up Truck Access. Typical 45 psi (310 kPa) maximum tire pressure. Single axle loadings of 4 kips (18 kN). Gross vehicle loads of 8,000 lbs (3.6 MT).

2 in (50 mm)

None4

2 in (50 mm)

None4

Trail Use. Loading for pedestrian, wheelchair, equestrian, bicycle, motorcycle and ATV traffic.

None4 None

4 None

4 None

4

1 The GeoPave system can be applied in areas where loading is greater than those listed above. In these situations, call Presto Geosystems or an authorized Presto Geosystems’ representative for specific recommendations.

2 CBR is the abbreviation for California Bearing Ratio. Methods for determining CBR vary from more sophisticated laboratory methods to simple field identification methods that use hand manipulation of the soil. Presto does not recommend one method over the other; however, the user must have a high degree of confidence in the results produced by the chosen method. If other-than-CBR soil strength values exist, use available correlation charts to relate the value to CBR.

3 With the aggregate/topsoil mix and a vegetative surface, infrequent/occasional passes are recommended. Infrequent/occasional passes are defined as the number of passes over any period of time that causes no lasting damage to the vegetation. This number will be a function of vegetation type and age, climatic conditions, and maintenance practices. This number is not a function of the GeoPave material.

4 A minimum of 2 in (50 mm) of aggregate base should be placed below the GeoPave units as a drainage layer and an infiltration storage area. Greater depth may be required depending upon design rainfall needs and sub base permeability.

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 –FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 4 OF 13

Infill Materials

The recommended infill shall be an aggregate or an aggregate/topsoil engineered infill for aggregate and vegetated pavements respectively. When specifying infill type, consideration should be given to appropriateness of infill for loading requirements, traffic frequency, and subgrade strength.

Aggregate Infill

The aggregate infill shall be a well-graded 0.375 in to 0.5 in (10 mm to 13 mm) crushed angular stone with a fine content less than 5%.

Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Infill

The aggregate/topsoil engineered infill shall consist of a homogenous mixture consisting of 1) a clear-stone/crushed rock having an AASHTO #5 or similar designation blended with 2) pulverized topsoil and 3) a void component generally containing air and/or water. This homogenous mixture will promote vegetative growth and provide required structural support. The aggregate portion shall have a particle range from 0.375 in to 0.5 in (10 mm to 13 mm). The percentage void-space of the aggregate portion shall be at least 30%. The pulverized topsoil shall equal 33% of the total volume and be added and blended to produce a homogenous mixture prior to placement.

Choice of vegetation shall be determined based upon local climate and proposed use.

Base Materials

If necessary for loading requirements, the recommended base shall be aggregate or an engineered aggregate/topsoil mixture, and should be consistent with the chosen infill type.

Porous Base for Storage

A minimum of 2 in (50 mm) of base material is generally recommended for drainage even if not required by design for load support. Additional base depth may be added if required over a low-permeable base or to function as a storm water detention/retention layer.

Under some conditions, a geotextile separation layer may be required between the natural ground and the base material. See Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer, Optional Sub-Drainage Component, and Base Preparation for information relative to installation. Care shall be exercised in choosing this layer to assure that it does not impede permeability.

Aggregate Base

When the specified infill is aggregate, the aggregate base shall be a poorly-graded crushed aggregate with a fine content less than 5%. The aggregate shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density. After compaction, the surface shall be uniform with no protrusions from larger aggregate particles.

Base Particle Size Passing Sieve Analysis

Sieve Size % Particles Passing Opening

½ in 95-100%

3/8 in 15-20%

#4 0-5%

Aggregate/Topsoil Engineered Base

When the specified infill is an aggregate/topsoil engineered mix for vegetated surfaces, the base material shall be an aggregate/topsoil engineered mixture. A free-draining aggregate base is not recommended for porous pavements intended to be vegetated. The aggregate/topsoil engineered base ensures proper moisture retention and the nutrient component required to maintain healthy vegetation.

The aggregate/topsoil engineered base shall consist of a homogenous mixture consisting of 1) a clear-stone/crushed rock having an AASHTO #5 or similar designation blended with 2) pulverized topsoil and 3) a void component generally containing air and/or water. This homogenous mixture will promote vegetative growth and provide required structural support. The aggregate portion shall have a particle range from 0.375 in to 1.0 in (10 mm to 25 mm) with a D50 of 0.5 in (13 mm). The percentage void-space of the aggregate portion when compacted shall be at least 30%. The pulverized topsoil shall equal 33% of the total volume and be added and blended to produce a homogenous mixture prior to placement. The mixture shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density.

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


PAGE 5 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014– PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 –FEB 2014

Key Porous Pavement System Characteristics

Elements Important to Structural Integrity

The GeoPave unit (or any other similar material) must have five primary characteristics to adequately support loads, eliminate expansion-related failures, and to enable fast and efficient construction. Those characteristics are:

(1) suitable wall strength (2) sufficient unit stiffness (3) a supporting base, if required (4) a large overall area and (5) a monolithic mesh bottom

1) Suitable Wall Strength: The wall strength must support wheel loading from the heaviest anticipated vehicles that will travel over the porous pavement system. Vehicular loading will create direct wall compression from tires and equipment outriggers as well as lateral forces from vehicle breaking and acceleration. The wall should resist vertical and lateral deformations when loaded. Caution should be exercised when using systems with thin walls.

2) Sufficient Unit Stiffness: The unit stiffness must allow deflections without unit breakage or separation when sub base soils yield under loading. When the unit is too flexible, the base soils support the complete load. When the unit is too rigid, it could break under normal loading in low temperature conditions. Caution should be exercised when using systems that are either too flexible or too rigid.

3) Supporting Base if required: The unit support base must have a large enough area-of-contact with the base soil so high wheel loads at the top of the unit are reduced sufficiently when transferred to the base soil. This will provide a system with a greater range of stability. Caution should be exercised when using systems that have little contact area between the porous pavement unit and the base soil.

4) Large Overall Area: A large overall area, in conjunction with the other characteristics, ensures maximum load dissipation. If unit separation should occur and any given unit functions independently, larger unit areas will lower the pressure on base and subgrade soils. Caution should be exercised when using systems that have smaller contact areas.

5) Monolithic Mesh Bottom: The unit should contain a monolithic mesh bottom for encapsulating the aggregate infill and preventing material loss from the bottom of the units when exposed to repeated loading and freeze-thaw cycles. Caution should be exercised when using systems without monolithic mesh bottoms.

PRESTO

GEOPAVE® DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW

GP – 001-FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 – PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 6 OF 13

Figure 2 GeoPave System Dimensions and Layout

PRESTO

GEOPAVE® DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW

PAGE 7 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014 - PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 –Feb 2014

Figure 3 GeoPave System Material Properties and Usage Guideline

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 –FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014–PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 8 OF 13

Installing the GeoPave System

Subgrade Preparation

Excavate the area, allowing for the GeoPave unit thickness and the base material depth (where the base material is required). When working with in-situ soils that have poor permeability, provide adequate drainage from the excavated area if the area has the potential to collect water. The in-situ soil should be relatively dry and free from any standing water. Finish-grade the surface of the in-situ soil specifically when the GeoPave unit is to be installed without additional base material. Level and clear the area of large objects such as rocks, pieces of wood, etc. to enable the GeoPave units to connect properly and remain stationary after installation.

Sub base or base, when required, shall be compacted and fine graded as appropriate. Caution should be exercised to assure that porous sub bases not be over compacted such that porosity is hindered.

Optional Geosynthetic Separation Layer

If required and/or specified by the project engineer, the geosynthetic layer shall be rolled out over the prepared subgrade along the alignment of the reinforced surface. The geosynthetic shall be pulled taut to ensure that there are no folds. Geosynthetic layer overlaps, if required, shall be according to plans and manufacturer’s recommendations.

Optional Sub-Drainage Component

If required and/or specified by the project engineer, install the specified sub-drain and outlet according to construction drawings. Ensure that a proper slope is maintained throughout the drainage system and that the outlet is free from any obstructions preventing free drainage.

Base Preparation

If required, the specified base material is spread over the prepared base, compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density and fine graded as appropriate. Caution should be exercised to assure that porous sub bases are not over compacted such that porosity is hindered. Refer to Table 2 for base depth recommendations.

GeoPave Unit Installation

Orientation & Laying Pattern of Units Place the GeoPave units with the mesh bottom to the ground.

When the application is a narrow pedestrian access lane, stagger the units to produce the bricklayer or the offset pattern.

When the application is a large area, stagger the units to produce the herringbone pattern. This pattern reduces straight seams to one and a half block lengths and allows for better disguise of the unit seams.

The staggered pattern is developed by using half GeoPave units made by field cutting a full unit and placing the units as illustrated. Cut the units with a hand or power saw to custom fit both contours and/or around obstructions. These final seam patterns assure maximum load transfer and support and improved aesthetics.

Other laying patterns are generally not recommended.

Bricklayer Herringbone

Offset

Bricklayer HerringboneHerringbone

OffsetOffset

Figure 4 Laying Patterns

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


PAGE 9 OF 13 COPYRIGHT 2014 – PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GP-001 – FEB 2014

Positioning of Units If required, ensure that all adjacent hard-surfaced paving work is completed before installing the GeoPave porous pavement system.

Place the first row of GeoPave units against a stationary edge when available. Units should be placed such that corners and seams do not protrude above the desired surface elevation. Abut adjoining units to form the desired laying pattern.

Figure 5 Joining GeoPave Units

Secure adjoining GeoPave units together using the U-CLIP connection device. U-CLIPS shall be set in place by hammer in the half-wall locations. There are four locations on each long side and two locations on each short side. They shall be driven completely so that adjacent sections have horizontally level profiles. Caution should be exercised to assure that no material is trapped between adjacent sections prior to the placement of U-CLIPS.

Figure 6 The U-Clip Connection Device

Optional Anchoring of Units The GeoPave units can be fixed in-place with 0.5 in (13 mm) #4 rebar to prevent movement of the units. Anchoring may be necessary if the GeoPave units are placed on a slope (5-10%).

The anchors can be driven through the cell-wall vent holes either in the middle of the GeoPave units or along the perimeter as required.

Anchoring units in-place should occur after installation of all the units within the defined area.

Figure 7 Optional Stake Anchoring

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 –FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014– PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 10 OF 13

Infilling the GeoPave Unit

Infill the GeoPave units with the specified material for the intended application. Infilling should take place immediately after the units are installed to minimize movement of the units.

Infill shall be placed with each successive pile of aggregate or aggregate/topsoil mixture to be placed at the edge of previously filled GeoPave units and spread with a skid steer, small tractor or small loader. Spread the infill material uniformly over the units. Hand raking will be performed to assure that the aggregate fill is at the top of the cell walls.

Follow procedures for applying seed or sod. No specific compaction will be required, but traffic will allow for the slight settlement of the infill material under ordinary use.

Upward buckling of the GeoPave area is generally not an issue if the units have been installed using the recommended laying patterns and infilled appropriately.

Seed or Sod for Vegetated Systems Once the aggregate/topsoil engineered mixture is evenly spread in the GeoPave units, either grass seed or sod may be applied. If using sod, the GeoPave units should be under filled by 1.0 inch (25 mm) to allow room to seat or press the sod within the GeoPave units.

Follow good seeding, fertilizing, and water procedures for turf establishing based on regional practices.

Delineation for Vegetated Systems With vegetated systems, once healthy turf has been established, the GeoPave structure will have minimal visibility when good turf maintenance practices are followed. Delineation may be desirable to create visibility for access lanes. Delineation methods include in-ground curbing, above-ground curbing, shrubbery or vegetation, perimeter lighting or delineation markers

Maintenance

Aggregate Surface Wear Course When the pavement surface is aggregate, the surface should be inspected from time to time to identify signs of slight cell infill loss. If cell infill loss occurs, additional infill material should be added.

Vegetated Surface When the pavement surface is vegetation, lawn care should follow normal watering, fertilizing and mowing procedures. Vegetated surfaces are intended for infrequent or occasional traffic with a maximum H-10 loading. The pavement should be monitored to ensure traffic frequency and loading does not exceed the pavement design.

Snow Removal If required, snow removal should be done using one of the following basic procedures:

Keep a metal edged plow blade a minimum of 1.0 in (25 mm) above the surface during plowing operations, or

Use a plow blade with a flexible rubber edge, or

Use a plow blade with skids on the lower outside corners so that the plow blade does not come in direct contact with the porous pavement system.

When deeper ground freeze occurs, the system functions as a typical hard pavement surface. If a sharp metal plow-blade comes in direct contact with the surface during plowing, any portion of the GeoPave system that protrudes above the normal surface level could be damaged or removed by the blade.

PRESTO GEOPAVE®



Estimating Time and Cost of Installation

Typical Crew Size and Responsibilities

2 Crew to set the GeoPave units in place. NOTE: Adding or subtracting one or two people to the crew may result in a cost-effective productivity increase depending on local work efficiencies.

2 Crew to spread and level the specified infill.

1 Equipment operator for the front-end loader.

Equipment Needed and Purpose

Saws, U-clips (may be purchased from Presto’s distributors/representatives) and anchors (if required) – all or some of these are used for cutting and securing the GeoPave units as required per the plans or as needed during construction.

A small tractor/backhoe or loader for infilling of the GeoPave units.

Rakes and shovels for final leveling of the infill material.

Typical Construction Sequences and Times

Productivity is a variable and the ranges below are typical. Select an installation rate through personal experience or after discussion of project details with Presto or one of its qualified distributors.

1. Place the GeoPave units on the prepared base and install connecting U-clips. 60-75 units/man-hr

2. Fill the in-place GeoPave units using the small loader or backhoe to evenly distribute the specified infill.

100 - 120 units/man-hr

3. Level the infill using rakes and shovels. If aggregate, overfill the top of the cell walls 0.5 in (13 mm). If aggregate/topsoil mixture, rake flush with the top of the cell walls.

75 - 100 units/man-hr

NOTE: The above three sequences can be in progress at the same time if workspace is adequate.

Table 2 Approximate Quantities of Infill Material Required for GeoPave Unit

Depth of unit Volume of Aggregate Required

per unit Volume of Aggregate Required

per 1000 ft² (100 m²)

2 in (50 mm) 0.0293 yd³ (0.0224 m³) 5.447 yd³ (4.48 m³)

General Notes

1. The tractor/backhoe loader must be sized so it can distribute the fill material per time/productivity requirements.

2. Experience shows that the above installation rates would be considered typical rates of installation.

3. As is with all construction operations, placement of material stockpiles, crew productivity, jobsite conditions, special installation requirements such as cutting and custom fitting of the GeoPave units, etc. significantly affect overall productivity, therefore actual results may be different than the estimates above.

PRESTO GEOPAVE®


GP-001 –FEB 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014– PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS PAGE 12 OF 13

Total Time and Materials Required

Area of installation = length x width of site

(________) ft (m) long x (________) ft (m) wide = (________)ft² (m²) Area

GeoPave units required = ft² (m²) (Area 5.38 ft² (0.50 m²)/unit [the GeoPave unit is 20 in x 40 in (0.50 m x 1.00 m) nominal]

(________) ft² (m²) Area 5.38 ft² (0.50 m²)/unit = (________) units

Man-hr required for installation of GeoPave units = GeoPave units 75 units/man-hr

(________) units 75 units/man-hr = (________) man-hr

Infill material quantities = GeoPave units x yd³ (m³)/unit (see Table 2)

(________) units x (________) yd³ (m³)/unit = (________) yd³ (m³)

Man-hr required for placing infill = GeoPave units 120 units/man-hr


Man-hr required for leveling of infill = GeoPave units 100 units/man-hr


Man-hr required for placing base material = GeoPave units 100 units/man-hr


Total Cost of Time and Materials

GeoPave unit cost $________/unit x ________units = $

Cost of Infill $________/yd³ (m³) x ________yd³ (m³) = $

Cost of Labor $________/man-hr x ________man-hr = $

Cost of Equip. Operator $________/man-hr x ________man-hr = $

Cost of Front-end Loader $________/hr x ________hr = $

APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST $

PRESTO GEOPAVE®



Limited Warranty

Presto Geosystems warrants each GeoPave® unit which it ships to be free from defects in materials and workmanship at the time of manufacture. Presto’s exclusive liability under this warranty or otherwise will be to furnish without charge to Presto’s customer at the original f.o.b. point a replacement for any unit which proves to be defective under normal use and service during the 10-year period which begins on the date of shipment by Presto. Presto reserves the right to inspect any allegedly defective unit in order to verify the defect and ascertain its cause.

This warranty does not cover defects attributable to causes or occurrences beyond Presto's control and unrelated to the manufacturing process, including, but not limited to, abuse, misuse, mishandling, neglect, improper storage, improper installation or improper application. Presto makes no other warranties, express or implied, written or oral, including, but not limited to, any warranties or merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose, in connection with the GeoPave® system. In no event shall Presto be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages for the breach of any express or implied warranty or for any other reason, including negligence, in connection with the GeoPave system. Contact Presto Products Company, Ph: 800-548-3424; 920-738-1328 or Email: [email protected].

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared for the benefit of customers interested in the GeoPave Porous Pavement System. It was reviewed carefully prior to publication. Presto assumes no liability and makes no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness. Final determination of the suitability of any information or material for the use contemplated, or for its manner of use, is the sole responsibility of the user.

Project specifications take precedence over all manufacturers’ recommendations.

Geosystems® and GeoPave® are registered trademarks of Reynolds Presto Products Inc. The GeoPave system is patent pending.

4.8'

5.6'

5.9'

4.60'

5.1'10.6'

5.9'

TRANSFORMER

5' S

IDE

WA

LK

4.41'

4.65'

10

.5'

4.9'

5.6'

5.0'

4.4'

4.5'

10

.6'

N 7

1°5

5'0

1.4

" W

11

0.5

0'

CU

RB

CU

T

NO

RT

H 3

3R

D S

TR

EE

T(R

OW

VA

RIE

S)

5' S

IDE

WA

LK

EX. CBRIM = 4.81'

24

.1'

4.8'

4.65'

5.2'

5.3'

24

.2'

DWELLING

52.1'

EXISTING1 STORY

52.2'

CONC. DECK

5.3'

CO

NC

. W

AL

K

5.0'

4.9'

N 6

2°3

2'0

1.4

" W

13

4.7

0'

CU

RB

CU

T

4.3'

4.4'

4.76'

5.3'4.7'

4.5'5.0'

4.90'

76.9

'

5.7'

5.23'

5' S

IDE

WA

LK

4.7'

4.5'

4.6'

4.3'

4.3'

EX. CBRIM = 4.10'

4.5'

5.0'

5.0'

5.1'

69.1'

5.3'

14

.1'

4.9'

4.6'

5.0'

39.5'

CONC. PAD

CONC.LANDING

5.0'

EXISTING TOP OF SLOPE

PARCEL: 4362

TAX MAP: 112

N 11°38'58.6" E 229.00'

EXISTING BOTTOM OF SLOPE

5.3'

6.2'

5.1'6.5'

5.3'5.1'

5.1'

5.1'

6.8'

5.1'

6.5'

GRASS AREA

6.8'

4.8'

7.3'

6.8'

4.8'

5.1'

GRASS AREA

5.4'

4.5'

4.3'4.3'

4.4'

4.4'

4.5'

5.0'

5.2'

4.8' 5.1'6.7'

4.7'

6.5'

6.7'

6.5'

R = 5669.58'

5.4'

EXISTING SIDEWALK (WIDTH VARIES)6.33'

TH

E S

AN

DB

AR

SIG

N

TILE WALK

CONC. WALK

13.2'

5.49'5.9'

ELEC. VAULT

6.3'

5.84'5.34'

CO

NC

. W

AL

K

6.05'

6.4'

6.19'

6.3'

5.0'

29

.9'

& THE SANDBAR LOUNGEEXISTING ANGELO'S RESTAURANT

123.5'

8.0

'

6.6'

32

.4'

8.0

'

40.5'

5.5'

5.5'

CONC. CURB

COASTAL HIGHWAY 120' ROW

5.3'

ASPHALT

4.5'

4.9'

5.0'

4.8'

5.0'

5.1'

4.7'

4.5'4.6'

4.6'4.8'

4.8'

5.2'

5.0'5.2'

5.2' 4.9'

5.0'

4.9'

5.2'

5.1'

4.7'

S 7

8°2

1'0

1.4

" E 2

50

.00

'

4.2'

7.1'

4.2'

4.5'

6.5'

5.0'

4.7'

4.8'

ASPHALT PARKING7.1'

CURB CUT

NOTE: EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO

BENCHMARK OCM 12 (1999). ELEV. = 9.79' (1929 DATUM)

5.3'

CURB CUT6.24' CONC. CURB

ANGELO'S RESTAURANT SIGN

5.7'

5.3'

6.21'

5.5'

6.49'

5.4'

6.5'5.3'

CONC. CURB

6.3'

6.53'

5.7'

NORTH PER PLAT O.D.C. 2/23

7.9'

7.0'

TAX MAP: 112PARCEL: 4362

PARCEL: 4362

TAX MAP: 112

TH

E I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N C

ON

TA

INE

D O

N T

HE

SE

PL

AN

S,

PL

AT

S O

R O

TH

ER

DO

CU

ME

NT

S I

S P

RO

VID

ED

FO

R T

HE

EX

CL

US

IVE

US

E O

F T

HE

CL

IEN

T N

AM

ED

HE

RE

ON

, A

ND

IS

SU

BJE

CT

TO

TH

E C

LIE

NT

AN

D/O

R W

OR

K P

RO

DU

CT

PR

IVIL

EG

E.

BYREVISION DATE

AN

Y A

ME

ND

ME

NT

S,

CO

PY

ING

OR

DIS

TR

IBU

TIO

N,

INC

LU

DIN

G C

OM

PU

TE

R G

EN

ER

AT

ED

AM

EN

DM

EN

TS

, C

OP

YIN

G O

R D

IST

RU

BIT

ION

IS

ST

RIC

TL

Y P

RO

HIB

ITE

D U

NL

ES

S A

UT

HO

RIZ

ED

IN

WR

ITIN

G B

Y R

US

SE

LL

T

. H

AM

MO

ND

SU

RV

EY

ING

L.L

.C..

TENTH TAX DISTRICT, WORCESTER COUNTY, MARYLANDTOWN OF OCEAN CITY

GRADING PLAN

LANDS OF G & A RUSSO & SONS INC.33RD STREET & COASTAL HIGHWAY

R U S S E L L T. H A M M N D

N/A

R. SAVAGE

R.T.Hammond

DRAWN BY

DESIGNED BY

CHECKED BY

(410) 352-5674 - (410)726-8076

10310 Hotel Road Bishopville, MD 21813

SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING

,Surveying LLC

N

SURVEYED BY

DATE

SCALE

FILE #

1" = 20'

2/28/2014

2014-0779R.T.H./R.S.

REMOVE EXISTING VINYL FENCE-5'-0" LANDSCAPED AREATO BE PROVIDED ALONG COASTAL HIGHWAY-NEW FENCEW/ LANDSCAPING 42" HIGH FENCE FROM TOP OF NEW PATIO* PROPOSED CONC. H/C RAMP-STAIRS AND ASHATCHED AREA INDICATED CONC. WALKWAYTO EXISTING FRONT DOOR. (ADA ACC. ROUTE)

=

WIDE TWOWAY DRIVE

23'

EXISTING 1000. GAL.

12' RADIUS

WIDE TWOWAY DRIVE

(3) 8 YD. TRASH CONT.

8" THICK 4000. PSI

TR

UC

K B

AC

KU

P A

RE

A

39'-0" C

LE

AR

TR

AS

H

(3) 10 X 10 CONC PADS

EX

IST

ING

PA

RK

ING

BU

MP

ER

S

NEW 9 X 20

SPACE

EX

IST

ING

PA

RK

ING

BU

MP

ER

S

NEW 9 X 20SPACE

10

11

12

(5) NEW SPACESMUST BE ASPHALT

NEW 9 X 20SPACE

NEW 9 X 20

SPACE

8

9

7

5

6

EX

IST

ING

PA

RK

ING

BU

MP

ER

S

2

3

4

1

EXIST. 23'WIDE TWOWAY DRIVE

ED

GE

OF

PA

VE

ME

NT

FFE = 8.0' ’ AS PROPOSED TOP OF PATIO TYP.

TYPICAL PERVIUOS PAVER RAISED PATIO-

NEW SHED ROOF

TILE

123.5'

CO

NC

. W

AL

K

PROP. ROOF LINE

8.0

'

PROP. ROOF LINE

A = 278.33'

RIM = 4.25'EX. CB

23'

HGT. TO MATCH EXISTING 1ST FLOOR

17.6'

24

. 5'

12.5'

PROPOSEDADDITION

0

20

( IN FEET )

1" = '

20 2010

ACC. SPACE

8 X 20 VAN 8 X 20 VANACC. SPACE

20'8'

NEW 9 X 20SPACE

20'

8'

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

9.5'

REVISED PARKING SPACES (HANDICAP LOCATION) 03/25/14 RTH

WALK

PR

OP

. G

UT

TE

R

PROPOSED

5' x 5' RAIN

GARDEN

EXISTING

EXISTING

4.8'

4.8'

4.1'4.2'

4.8'4.3'

4.2'

4.4'

4.3'4.0'

4.1'

4.8'

4.9'

4.5'

4.4'

4.4'

5.00'

GENERAL NOTES:

PER FIRM NO. 245207 0001 G

DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1988

FLOOD ZONE: A6 (BFE = 6.0')

BFE = 8.0' PER TOWN CODE

SIDES: 5' FOR 1,2 & 3 STORY DWELLINGS

SIDES: 10' FOR 4 & 5 STORY DWELLINGS

MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 50' OR 5 STORIES

EX. ZONING: LC-1

ZONING SETBACKS:

FRONT: 10'

ADDRESS: 3303 COASTAL HIGHWAY

DEED REF: F.W.H. 743/270

PLAT REF: W.C.L. 109/23

TAX MAP: 112, PARCEL: 4363

LOT AREA: 1.41 ACRES ’ (61,277 SQ. FT. ’)

PLAT REF: O.D.C. 2/23 & O.D.C. 2/13

REAR: 10' (25' IF AJOINED BY R-1 DISTRICT)

65

475.00'

PROPOSED PERVIOUS

GRASS AREA

GRASS AREA

5.0

'

23'WIDE TWOWAY DRIVE

23.00'

45

'

9'

17.5'

17.5'

9'9'

17.5'

13

66

67

68

69

707172

7374

7576

EXISTINGASPHALT DRIVE

TR

EN

CH

"B

"

TR

EN

CH

"C

"

PROPOSED

ASPHALT DRIVE

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

= 2°48'46"T

RE

NC

H "

A"

LA

ND

SC

AP

E F

ILT

ER

AR

EA

LA

ND

SC

AP

E F

ILT

ER

AR

EA

INV. = 2.1'

INV. = 1.9'

EXISTING 12" CMP

PROP.

2'x 2' CATCH

BASIN

RIM= 4.0'

EXISTING 12" CMP

INV. = 2.3'

5.7'5.2' 5.2'

5.7'5.2'5.2'

5.7'

5.2'

5.2'5.2' 5.7' 5.2'

5.2'5.5'

5.7'

5.3'

5.5'

5.5

5.2'

5.2'

5.7'

5.0'

5.0'5.0'

CU

RB

CU

T (

PR

OP

OS

ED

)

8.0'

7.8'

8.0'

8.0' 7.8'

7.8'7.8'

4" SPACE IN WALLFOR OVERFLOW (TYP)(SEE DETAIL)

(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)72.46 SQ.FT. REQUIRED=

Af= (WQV)(Df)

(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)

108.7 CU.FT.=

BIORETENTION AREA "A" - 45' x 5' = 225 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "B"

BIORETENTION AREA "B" - 81' x 5' = 405 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

= 260.93 SQ.FT. REQUIRED

E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "C"

BIORETENTION AREA "C" - 63' x 5' = 315 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

= 113 SQ.FT. REQUIRED

DRAINAGE AREA #6 = 1,305 SQ. FT. OF ASPHALT AREA

1,305 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 108.7 CU. FT. WQV


2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV


2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV

=Af= (WQV)(Df)

(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)

391.4 CU.FT.

(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)


2,034 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 169.50 CU. FT. WQV

(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)=

Af= (WQV)(Df) 169.50 CU.FT.

E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "A"


2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV


2,034 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 169.50 CU. FT. WQV

DRAINAGE AREA #4 = 2602 SQ. FT. PERVIOUS PAVER PATIO

2602 SQ. FT. x 0.083333 = 216 CU.FT. WQV

DRAINAGE AREA #5 = 421 SQ. FT. ROOFTOP RUNOFF

421 SQ. FT. x 0.083333 = 35.1 CU.FT. WQV


1,305 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 108.7 CU. FT. WQV


2,349 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 195.7 CU. FT. WQV

INV. OF 6" UNDERDRAIN = 3.2'

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN

DRAINAGE AREA #7 RUNOFF FLOWS TO EXISTING CATCH BASINS

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES:

LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD)

PROPOSED ADDITION TO BUILDING = 421 SQ.FT.

PROPOSED PAVER PATIO (PERVIOUS) = 2,602 SQ.FT.

PROPOSED CONCRETE RAMP AND STEP = 212 SQ.FT.

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PARKING = 12,406 SQ.FT.

PROPOSED DUMPSTER PAD = 133 SQ.FT.

LA

ND

SC

AP

E F

ILT

ER

AR

EA

ASPHALT DRIVE

PERVIOUS

TRASH ENCLOSURE

( IN FEET )

1" = '

20 0

20

2010

DENOTES LARGE TREE

DENOTES GUY WIRE

1929 DATUMDENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION

DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT

DENOTES WATER VALVE

DENOTES IRON ROD FOUND

DENOTES UNMARKED POINT

DENOTES POWER POLE

DENOTES WATER METER

DENOTES MAG NAIL FOUND

DENOTES UTILITY PED.

LOW SHADE LIGHT

OVERFLOW DEVICE

EXISTING STREET SIGN

HANDICAPE SPACE

LEGEND

These standard symbols will

be found in the drawing.

SFSF

SF

SF

SF

SF SF

SF

SF SF

SF

SF

SF

SF

SF

SF SF

SF

SFSF

SF

SFSF

SW - 1.2

DENOTES SILT FENCE AND/OR LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE

DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION

DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION

7.5'

DENOTES POST CONSTRUCTION FLOW

4.2'

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LEGEND

DENOTES LANDSCAPE FILTER AREA

DENOTES PROPOSED DOWN SPOUT LOCATION

DENOTES PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT

SF

SF

PARKING

4.8'

4.6'4.6'

4.8'4.8'

4.6'

3,368 SQ. FT. x 0.95/12 = 266 CU. FT.

5' x 5' RAIN GARDEN = 33 CU. FT. OF WQv (SEE DETAIL SHEET SW1.3)

IMPERVIOUS PATIO = 2,606 SQ. FT.

TREATED BY STONE LANDSCAPE TRENCH

REMOVED 6" PVC FROM LANDSCAPE FILTER , ADDED GRADES TO LANDCAPE FILTER 05/13/2014 RTH

OR UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR UNDER

THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND LICENSE NO. 21329, EXPIRATION DATE 1/08/2015.

4" CONCRETE PAD FORFIRE DEPT.

FLOOD LIGHT LOCATION

FLOOD LIGHT LOCATION

3' x 53' STONE LANDSCAPE

TRENCH

3' x 38' STONE LANDSCAPE

TRENCH

27.4

'

GREASE TRAP

PR

OP

OS

ED

SLO

T D

RA

IN

ADDED STONE LANDSCAPE TRENCH AND PATIO DRAIN FOR IMPERVIOUS PATIO07/08/2014 RTH

E.S.D.: BIORETENTION AREA "D"

BIORETENTION AREA "D" - 53' x 3' = 159 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

= 144.4 SQ.FT. REQUIRED

DRAINAGE AREA #3 = 2,601 SQ. FT. OF PATIO AREA

2,601 SQ. FT. x 0.08333= 216.7 CU. FT. WQV

(.5)(0.5 + 1) (2)(k) (Hf + Df) (Tf)=

Af= (WQV)(Df) 169.50 CU.FT.

- 38 x 3' = 114 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

TOTAL = 273 SQ. FT. PROVIDED

FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION

(CLEAR 12' OF

VEGETATION)

FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION

(NO LANDSCAPING OR

OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN 7'6"

EACH SIDE OF CONNECTION)

WOOD TIMBERS

WOOD TIMBERS


5. NEW BUSINESS

G. Request to Approval Purchase of Fire Station Appliances and Bunk Room Furniture presented by City Engineer

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Terence J. McGean, PE, City Engineer RE: Fire Station 4 Furniture and Equipment Purchase DATE: August 5, 2014

ISSUE(S): Request approval to purchase Fire Station 4 appliances and bunk room furniture

SUMMARY: Staff is in the process of fitting out Fire Station 4 in preparation for a

September move in date. Two items, appliances and bunk room furniture, exceed $10,000 and require council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: $27,024 to be paid from Fire Station 4 project funds RECOMMENDATION: Award appliance purchase to Eastern Shore Appliance in the amount

of $10,911.91. Award bunk room furniture purchase to All Aboard, Inc. in the amount of $16,113.00

Excellent Service through a High Performing Town organization

ALTERNATIVES: None RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Captain Eric Peterson, Fire Department COORDINATED WITH: Terence McGean, City Engineer ATTACHMENT(S): Bid summary

Agenda Item # 5G


Fire Station 4 Appliance Bid Summary

Vendor AmountEastern Shore Appliance 10,911.91$ Lowes 11,807.19$ Sears 11,827.14$ Delaware Appliance 12,878.00$

Fire Station 4 Bunk Room Furniture Bid Summary

Vendor AmountAll A Board, Inc 16,113.00$ Butler Wood Crafters 21,809.97$

* bunk furnitutre is solid wood institutional grade


5. NEW BUSINESS

H. Capital Improvement Plan Update presented by City Engineer

TOWN OF


TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council THRU: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager FROM: Terence J. McGean, PE, City Engineer RE: Capital Improvement Plan Update DATE: August 6, 2014

ISSUE(S): Capital Improvement Plan Update SUMMARY: Staff has prepared an update to the Capital Improvement Plan FISCAL IMPACT: The following policies have been adopted by the Mayor and City

Council regarding debt: 1. Total debt as a percentage of assessed value shall not exceed

3%. Current actual is 1.08%. 2. Net General Fund Debt shall not exceed 8% of operating

expenses. Current actual is 6.85%. 3. Ten year debt payout ratio shall not be less than 65%. Current

actual is 77.77%. RECOMMENDATION: Review submitted draft plan, add or delete projects, change project

priorities or timing as desired and approve.

Financially Sound Town Government

ALTERNATIVES: Send plan back to staff for revisions. RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Terence McGean, City Engineer COORDINATED WITH: Martha Bennett, CPA, Finance Director

Hal Adkins, Public Works Director Susan Petito, Recreation and Parks Director (Project details also provided to Convention Center Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, and Emergency Services Director)

ATTACHMENT(S): 1) Plan summary Power Point

2) Project summary by category 3) Project summary by funding source 4) Project detail report

Agenda Item # 5H


Fire Station 4 Complete by End of AugustFire Headquarters: design approved, begin construction this winter.St. Louis Ave: Last phase this winterBeach Patrol: Begin construction this fallConvention Center Auditorium: Complete DecemberCanal Dredge: First phase to start this fall, 2nd

phase funded at 50%.

Public Safety Building and Service Center Roof Replacements: Completed51st Street Production well and well house completedDukes Ave Pump Station CompletedOld Landing Rd Pump Station CompletedRebuilt two clarigesters at the Wastewater plantPaving program (22nd/Herring, 32nd stneighborhood, 33rd, 41st, and 59th st.)

Includes projects identified by staff to start within the next 5 years.For inclusion in the CIP, projects should:◦ Have a relatively high monetary value◦ Have a long life◦ Result in the creation of an asset or the

revitalization of an asset.

In general Capital Improvement Projects include the following:◦ Construction of new Town facilities◦ Remodeling or expansion of existing Town facilities◦ Purchase and development of land◦ Operating equipment and machinery for new or

expanded facilities◦ Street construction, reconstruction & resurfacing◦ Planning and design costs related to specific Capital

Projects.

Department Categories◦ Public Safety◦ General Public Works◦ Municipal Complex◦ Highways and Streets◦ Recreation & Parks◦ Environmental◦ Technology & Communication (new)◦ Convention Center◦ Airport◦ Water◦ Wastewater

Debt funding◦ Bond Finance: General Fund supported◦ Bond Finance: OCCC Food Tax supported◦ Bond Finance: User Fee supported◦ Bond Finance: Wastewater Fees supported◦ Bond Finance: Water Fees supported◦ Capital Equipment Lease◦ State Loans

Pay As You Go and other funding sources◦ Federal Grants◦ State Grants◦ General Fund◦ Prior project balance (for projects shown in the CIP

that are already funded)◦ User Fees (stormwater)◦ Vehicle & Equipment Trust Fund◦ Wastewater Fund◦ Water Fund◦ Unfunded in current year (new)

No new bond projects for fy15Eagles landing Irrigation System: County FundsSkate Park and Downtown Recreation Complex: Coordination with St. Louis Ave work, cost figures updated.Unfunded projects: Utility undergrounding in Little Salisbury, Network backup systemsStreet Improvements/Stormwater: Coordination of funding remains a concern

Whiteside Building Replacement - 17City wide security upgrades - 16Council chambers A/V upgrades - 16Equipment replacement at PSB – 17/18Life Saving Museum elevator and stairs -171st Street Water Tank – 16/17Chicago Ave Bulkhead Repairs - 19Relocation of DPW Yard – 17+

$9.3 $23.4

$6.8

$4.8 $11.2

$10.6 $10.5

$39.6

Facilities

Highways and Streets

Recreation and Parks

Environment/Canals

Communication

Convention Center

Airport

Water andWastewater

$16.2

$22.0

$32.2

$10.7

$14.7

$2.5 $2.9

$13.9

FY15-19 GF Bond

GF PAYGO/UserFeesOther Bond*

Lease/Trust Fund

Federal & StateGrantsPrior Balance

Unfunded currentyearWater/WW PAYGO

* Includes wastewater & water bonds

$16.2

$5.0

$1.7 $1.2

$4.3

$20.0

Fy 15-19

General Fund

Food Tax

User Fee

County

Water Fee

Wastewater Fee

Total debt as a percentage of assessed Value◦ Policy= 3% Maximum◦ Current actual = 1.08%Net debt service (general fund debt) as a percentage of general fund expenditures◦ Policy = 8% Maximum◦ Current actual = 6.85%Debt 10 year payout ratio◦ Policy = 65% minimum◦ Current actual = 77.77%

Prepared by Martha Bennett, Finance Director




Capital Improvement PlanTown of Ocean City, Maryland

Department 1 Public Safety2015 2019thru

Contact Terence McGean

DescriptionConstruction of a new Fire Station to be located in the front parking lot of the Public Safety Building Complex located at 65th Street Bayside.

Project # 08-PS-05

Priority 3 Important

JustificationThis is the final phase of the improvements recommended in the 2002 Fire Station Location Study. Replacement of Station 4 and renovations and additions to Fire Headquarters were phases 1 & 2 respectively completed in FY 14 and FY 15. This new Mid-Town Station would replace Station 3 currently located at 74th Street. Station 3 is located on a small lot with no room for expansion.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Mid-Town Fire Station Category Buildings

Type Improvement

Total Project Cost: $6,000,000

City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures600,000600,000Planning/Design

5,400,0005,400,000Construction/Maintenance

600,000 5,400,000 6,000,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources6,000,0006,000,000Bond Financing - General Fund

6,000,000 6,000,000Total

Town of Ocean City Capital Improvement Plan




DescriptionReplacement of the 500 kw generator at the public safety building.

Project # 15-PS-001


JustificationThis generator was installed in 1992. It is critical for the operation of the building in the event of a power loss.

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Public Safety Building Generator Replacement Category Equipment - PW

Type Equipment

Total Project Cost: $150,000

City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures150,000150,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

150,000 150,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources150,000150,000General Fund

150,000 150,000Total





DescriptionReplacemet of the chillers and cooling tower at the Public Safety Building. Chillers 100 ton 2 each, Cooling tower stainless steel 100 ton 2 each

Project # 15-PS-002


JustificationThis equipment was installed in 1992 and should not be expected to last beyond 25 years. Some energy savings should be anticiapted based on the increased effeciency of the new equipment.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower Category Buildings

Type Equipment


City Project Code


290,000290,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

10,000 290,000 300,000Total


300,000 300,000Total



Department 3 General Public Works2015 2019thru

Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionReplacement of the existing Public Works tram and tractor storage facility located at Philadelphia Ave and South 1st Street, known as the Whiteside Facility. Facility may be rebuilt at existing location or relocated, TBD

Project # 15-HS-002


JustificationThe existing pre-fabricated metal building at the Whiteside public works facity was constructed in 1977 and requires replacement. The building skin is rusted completely through in areas and the strucural frame is badly coorded and has been patch welded a number of times.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Replacement of Whiteside Facility Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code


800,000800,000Construction/Maintenance

40,000 800,000 840,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources840,000840,000Bond Financing - General Fund

840,000 840,000Total



Department 3 General Public Works2015 2019thru


DescriptionImprovements to City facilities for the purpose of increasing security. Improvments may include reception area modifications at City Hall, PSB and Recreation and parks, modifications to the council executive conferecne room, modifications to the city hall reception area, modifications to the PSB lobby area, installation of panic buttons at various locations, additional surveillance cameras and possible installation of metal detectors. Note that cost estimate is very conceptual pending completion of a security analysis.

Project # 15-HS-003

Priority 2 Very Important

JustificationSecuirty of the employees, elected officials and visitors to City facilities.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name City Wide Security Improvements Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures150,00075,000 75,000Construction/Maintenance10,0005,000 5,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

80,000 80,000 160,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources160,00080,000 80,000General Fund

80,000 80,000 160,000Total



Department 31 Municipal Complex Expan2015 2019thru

Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionModification to the entire eastern portion of the Department Of Public Works Complex inclusive of construction activities on the northern portion of the gravel lot recently purchased from the Laws Family, modifications to 65th Street itself inclusive of moving the gated entrance to align with the south wall of PSB, modifications to the Fuel Depot, reconstruction/relocation-shifting of the Fuel Depot, reconstruction/relocation of the Stock Room and Purchasing Department, construction of a bus storage facility, and repurposing of the Bus Barn via re-skinning etc.

Project # 07-TR-001


JustificationThe Town, working with the MTA , recently completed a $100,000 “Campus Plan”. The purpose of the plan was to address a Needs Assessment specific to the growth of the Transporation Department since 1983 and the overall inadequacy of the facilities for that department. As a result of the Needs Assessment and Campus Plan, a series of Capital Improvements have been identified that will not only address the Transportation Department growth since 1983 but will also address modification and reconfiguration of other facilities to address staff parking needs, overall traffic flow and fueling capabilities, and addresses relocation of Administrative Offices from the central core of the Complex by shifting them to the front of the Complex thus “setting the stage” for the land mass needed for future Wastewater Process Enhancements

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,800,0001,800,000Planning/Design

1,800,000 1,800,000Total


1,200,0001,200,000State Grants

1,800,000 1,800,000Total



Department 31 Municipal Complex Expan2015 2019thru

Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionRelocation of the current facilities and functions located at our Keyser Point Yard site to an alternative site and disposal, via sale, of the current property. Location and associated cost to be determined.

Project # 15-HS-001


JustificationThe current facility has been in use since the 1960’s. As the years have passed not only has the Town outgrown the current facility but residential development has now surrounded our property. We are basically operating a municipal/industrial type operation in the middle of a residential neighborhood at all hours of the day/night and weekends. The few structures that reside on the property have reached the end of their useful life and it is time to either invest in improvements to the overall site OR relocate. It is my preference to move. Site enhancements to the Keyser Point Road site that will make it far more marketable.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Relocation of DPW Yard Category Land acquisition & improvem

Type Improvement

Total Project Cost: $0

City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures00Planning/Design00Land Acquisition00Construction/Maintenance

0 0 0Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources00General Fund00Property Sale

0 0 0Total



Department 32 Highways and Streets2015 2019thru


DescriptionReplace gravel in existing landscape strips on 94th street with brick pavers.

Project # 08-HS-002

Priority 4 Less Important

JustificationThe landscape strips on the east half of 94th Street were originally designed to be sodded. Due to concerns from the recreation and parks department that grass would not grow in these areas because they were too narrow, decorative stone was substituted. This has also proven to be a maintenance problem due to weeds and stone blowing into the street.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name 94th Street Landscape Strips Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures60,00060,000Construction/Maintenance

60,000 60,000Total


60,000 60,000Total





DescriptionIn the early 90’s, the City installed landscaped medians on the wider streets north of 142nd in an effort to narrow the travel ways. The proposed project, would extend this concept south of 142nd street, but use landscape strips on the north and south sides of the streets in place of the median. This will reduce vehicle speeds and provide a wider, more pedestrian friendly route.

Project # 08-HS-003


JustificationCaine Woods is a large residential neighborhood on the bayside between 136th and 146th Streets. When originally constructed, 5’ sidewalks were installed on each side of the platted right-of-way and the rest of the street width was paved using thin thickness of asphalt. Because many of the streets have a right-of-way in excess of 50 feet wide, paved widths are too wide for a residential collector street. This has caused excessive speeding and traffic volumes within the neighborhood.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Caine Woods Street Improvements Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures2,400,000600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000Construction/Maintenance

600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,400,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources2,400,000600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000General Fund

600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,400,000Total




Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionFunding for conversation of overhead utilities (Power, Phone, and Cable Television) to underground.

Note that paving in Little Salisbury is scheudled for this year however NO funds for undergrounding utilites were appropriated in the FY 15 Budget

Project # 08-HS-006


JustificationDating back to 1991, the Town of Ocean City has taken efforts to place all overhead utilities underground, when financially feasible, as part of the overall annual Street Improvement Program. At this point in time, the MCC have funded between 2 and 3 million dollars annually for street improvements. This street improvement funding is currently covering the costs of storm drain upgrades, sidewalk replacement (where needed), concrete rubble disposal fees, hot mix, and all associated labor that is attributable to these efforts. As a side note: any water and wastewater improvements are funded separately. That funding scenario leaves the concept of undergrounding overhead utilities as unfunded. Historically the Town set aside an annual amount of funding in anticipation of such efforts. That annual “set aside” was discontinued a few years ago. Now that we are finally able to invest in paving efforts, the topic of overall utility conversion will become an annual issue. When looking at the next few years worth of street selections for paving, the issue of 87th to 94th Street bayside comes to mind. Known as “Little Salisbury”, that area is currently slated for repaving in the Fall of 2014 and Spring of 2015 IF the annual Street Improvement Program allocation of $3,000,000 is provided. The majority of this neighborhool currently has overhead utilities and would be ideal for placement underground. Based on current cost estimates, the underground infrastructure (the skeleton) would cost roughly $2,715,000 and the conversion (the cabling and equipment) would cost roughly and additional $2,432,000.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Undergrounding of Utilities Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code UNDRGR

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures5,147,0002,715,000 2,432,000 0 0Construction/Maintenance

2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 5,147,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources2,432,0002,432,000 0 0General Fund2,715,0002,715,000Not funded current year !

2,715,000 2,432,000 0 0 5,147,000Total




Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionAnnual allocation for Street Improvement Program

Project # 08-HS-010

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationBased on the most recent update of the “Street Inventory – Pavement Condition Report”, updated in June 2013, the Town currently faces roughly 36.7 million dollars in pavement issues IF all streets were brought up to acceptable status simultaneously. Clearly that is not feasible but we must be proactive in our efforts to continue with an annual effort OR we will face further surface failures that will negate our ability to “overlay” an existing surface. With that in mind, and based on a review of the overall inventory, it is our request that $3,000,000 be allocated annually for a Street Improvement Program. At this time the use of that annual funding is directly attributable to the following work efforts: sidewalk replacement (where needed), concrete rubble disposal fees, hot mix, and all associated labor that is attributable to these efforts. Storm drain upgrades and replacements may be paid by storm water utility user fees as shown below. As a side note: Any water or wastewater improvements are funded separately AND the annual Street Improvement Funding does NOT account for any undergrounding of overhead utilities.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Street Improvements & Overlays Category Street Construction

Type Maintenance


City Project Code STPAV

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures12,000,0002,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000Construction/Maintenance

2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources9,000,0002,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000General Fund3,000,0000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000User fees

2,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,000Total




Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionDemolition of roadway. Upgrade of water, sewer, storm drains. Undergrounding of utilities and streetscaping.

Project # 09-HS-002


JustificationPortion of St. Louis Ave from N. Division Street to 17th Street is in severe state of decay. The entire roadway system needs to be demolished and reconstructed. This would also be a possbile catalyst for redevelopment on this thorroughfare.

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name St. Louis Ave Improvements Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,731,0001,731,000Construction/Maintenance

1,731,000 1,731,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,731,0001,731,000Prior project balance

1,731,000 1,731,000Total




Contact Hal Adkins

DescriptionDedication of a transit lane on Philadelphia Ave from 17th Street to Worcester Street. Partial demolition and reconfiguring of center islands, removal of parking on wester side of road, sidewalk and curbing modifications, new overhead mast poles and signs, and road resurfacing.

Project # 09-HS-012


JustificationTransit lane on Coastal Highway ends at 17th Street. From there south, buses are forced to comingle with general traffic circulation.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code



400,000 1,600,000 2,000,000Total


00Federal Grants

0 2,000,000 2,000,000Total



Department 4 Recreation and Parks2015 2019thru


DescriptionThe City has identified an existing street with a 75’ right-of-way located between Philadelphia Ave and the bay in Downtown Ocean City for conversion to a pedestrian oriented park. The street will be closed to unauthorized vehicles, and completely re-developed using environmentally friendly materials and natural landscaping. Phase 1 of the park included scenic walkways, restroom facilities, stage area, bay overlook was completed in 2006. The park also included a boardwalk with informational kiosks to educate visitors about the type and value of the natural resources in and around the City. Phase 2 of the park includes construction of a pier for tall ships, water taxis and other vessels

Project # 08-RP-001


JustificationAs Ocean City has grown, particularly the level of residential development that has occurred in recent years, the need for public parks and water access has increased. The recent visits by the Galleon have shown the popularity of tall ships as an attraction in Ocean City however many ships, including the "Pride of Baltimore" are unable to reach the 3rd street park docking location due to shallow water north of the Coast Guard basin.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code


500,000 500,000Total


500,000 500,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

Description Renovation of existing Ocean Bowl Skate Park and expansion of new skate park facilities in the 3rd Street area based on designs developed by the skate park design consultant in FY 2006/2007.

Project # 08-RP-006


JustificationThe Town has retained a design consultant in FY2006/2007 to develop a new design and cost estimate for the renovation and expansion of the skate park located at 3rd Street and St. Louis Avenue. The skate park was last re-built in 1998. The design firm of Wally Hollyday Design has been contracted by the Town to prepare plans for a 17,000 square foot expansion with additional equipment and furnishings. The skate park is a customer supported recreation amenity with revenue generated from admission fees.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Skate Park Renovations & Expansion Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures800,000800,000Construction/Maintenance20,33420,334Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

820,334 820,334Total


820,334 820,334Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionRenovation of the Downtown Recreation Complex with improvements recommended by Master Plan Consultant and modified to inlcude a pcinic pavillion, comfort station and swapping the backetball court and tennis court locations. This project would be completed in conjucntion with the skate park expansion project.

Project # 08-RP-008


JustificationThe Town retained a planning consultant in FY 2006/2007 to develop a new master plan for the Downtown Recreation Complex from Philadelphia Avenue to Chicago Avenue between 3rd Street and Fourth Street. Construction documents have been completed that divide the improvements into two phases of re-development and improvements beginning with the 3rd Street area around the skate park. The second phase will focus on improvement to the block between St. Louis Avenue and the Chicago Avenue boardwalk. Both phases may be built concurrently to save construction costs and coordinated with St. Louis Ave improvements. The completed project will be known as Bayside Park.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code


3,375,0001,375,000 2,000,000Construction/Maintenance

140,000 1,375,000 2,000,000 3,515,000Total


3,515,000 3,515,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionThe existing lights at the soccer field (s) at Northside Park are in need of replacement with a more energy efficient light system.

Project # 09-RP-003


JustificationThe existing soccer field lights are not as energy efficient and safe for play because of their age and style. A new light system would be safer and more cost efficient.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation Category Park Improvements

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


100,000 100,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources100,000100,000State Loan

100,000 100,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionThe expansion of the existing Parks Division maintenance/storage building in Northside Park to accommodate vehicle, equipment and supplies storage.

Project # 11-RP-002


JustificationThe existing Parks Division maintenance building is reaching capacity and will be in need of expansion to accommodate growth in vehicles and equipment. A design consultant will need to be retained to plan the expansion prior to construction.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code


15,000 15,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources290,00015,000 275,000General Fund

15,000 275,000 290,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionRegrade and reshape landscape west of the Parks Maintenance yard and north of the pathway in Northside Park to re-direct and improve storm water drainage and enhance area for public access.

Project # 12-RP-001


JustificationThe existing swale system north of the pathway and west of the Parks Maintenance yard is inefficient in handling storm water management and the current swale configuration blocks public access and impedes expansion of Parks Maintenance yard.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code


180,000 180,000Total


180,000 180,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionAsphalt overlay of Community Center parking lot at NSP at 125th Street. Overlay and drainage improvements to parking lot at Jamaica Ave

Project # 12-RP-003


JustificationThe current lot is over 25 years old and in need of resurfacing. Imrpovements will improve safety and enhance use of lot when substantial vehicle and pedestrian traffic is in parking lot. Jamaica Ave lot stormwater drainage configuration causes problems during Winterfest

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures155,00095,000 60,000Construction/Maintenance

95,000 60,000 155,000Total


155,000 155,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionReplacement or improvements of existing playgrounds at Dowtown Bayside, $85,000; Northside Park, $95,000; and Little Salisbury, $85,000.

Project # 14-RP-006


JustificationCurrent wood fiber safety surfacing at parks need to be replaced with a more compliant surfacing that meets ASTM standards for fall protection and impact attenuation, eixsting equipment is reaching end of life.

Useful Life 15 YearsProject Name Playground Replacements Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures265,00085,000 95,000 85,000Construction/Maintenance

85,000 95,000 85,000 265,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources265,00085,000 95,000 85,000State Grants

85,000 95,000 85,000 265,000Total




Contact Tom Shuster

DescriptionThis project involves the replacement of all components of the golf course irrigation system at Eagles Landing Golf Course, except the pump station which was replaced in 2012. This includes design and consultation services, materials, installation and warranty of pipe, valves, wire, sprinkler heads, field satellite controllers, radio components, central control and computers. This would also include improvements to pond aerators and wiring on course potable water supply, irrigation water holding pond improvements and some drainage and aesthetic improvements related to the installation of the irrigation system

Project # 15-RP-001

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationWhen the golf course was designed and bid out in 1988 it was a very basic low bid, low cost project. The irrigation system, as part of the project, followed that model. The irrigation system was installed in 1989 and has been plagued by problems since the beginning. Those problems have continued for the past 25 years. In an effort to keep the turfgrass healthy, the golf course staff has made many improvements over the years, adding sprinkler heads, improving controls and replacing the pump station. Those piecemeal improvements have reached their useful service life. In 2002, the Town contracted Irrigation Consulting Inc. to audit and evaluate the irrigation system. They concluded that the system.” may not be able to meet the expectation of the players and at the same time withstand the amount of play the course is getting” and added the “irrigation systems ability to provide conditions required by todays golfers is at its limit.” That was 12 years ago. In addition to improved playing conditions from a modern state of the art irrigation system, the golf course will benefit from improved energy use, greatly reduced operation and maintenance costs, improved golf course aesthetics and customer service upgrades.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Eagles Landing Irrigation System Category Park Improvements

Type Improvement


City Project Code


1,200,000 1,200,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,200,0001,200,000Bond Financing - User fee

supported

1,200,000 1,200,000Total



Department 51 Environmental2015 2019thru


DescriptionThis project consists of an on going program to maintenance dredge Canals within the city limits of Ocean City to an average depth of 4' below mean low water. The project would dredge approximately 6,000 cubic yards of material per year from canals. The priority for canal dredging will be determined based on average existing depths as shown on surveys performed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources in 2005 and 2006.

Project # 08-EV-001


JustificationHistorically maintaining a navigable depth within the Ocean City canal system was left to the property owners along the canal through a process outlined in the City code. The combination of a complex State and Federal dredging permit combined with the high cost of dredging has left the canal system in increasingly poor condition. This project would shift the burden of canal maintenance from the property owner to the City. The State Department of Natural Resources has collected survey data for the depths of all Ocean City canals. This data was then used to formulate an annual dredging program, prioritize dredging needs, and establish a regular canal maintenance program administered by the City.

Useful Life On GoingProject Name Canal Dredging Category Waterways

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,850,000250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000Construction/Maintenance

250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 1,850,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,850,000250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000General Fund

250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 1,850,000Total





DescriptionThe proposed project would construct a new double lane boat ramp in conjunction with Department of Natural Resouces dedging of lagoon at 64th Street. Replace boat ramp on Chesapeake Drive with ramp centrally located in Ocean City.

Project # 11-MC-009

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationNumerous citizen complaints of location of current boat ramp due to lack of parking and bathroom facilities.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Boat ramp at 64th Street Category Land acquisition & improvem

Type Improvement


City Project Code


750,000 750,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources750,000750,000Prior project balance

750,000 750,000Total




Contact Dean Dashield

DescriptionReplacement of 475 linear feet of timber bulkhead protecting the north shoreline of the Public Works Complex with new vinyl bulkhead.

Project # 14-EV-002


JustificationThe existing bulkhead is failing due to wood rot.

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Public Works Yard Bulkhead Category Infrastructure Maintenance

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


175,000 175,000Total


175,000 175,000Total





DescriptionRepair or replacement of steel bulkhead along Chicago Ave from 2nd to 4th street

Project # 14-EV-003


JustificationExisting bulkhead is beginning to corrode

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Chicago Ave Bulkhead Category Infrastructure Maintenance

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


2,000,000 2,000,000Total


2,000,000 2,000,000Total



Department 52Technology & Communicat2015 2019thru


DescriptionReplacement of the City Government Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) phone system.Justification:

Project # TC-14-001


JustificationCurrent system was installed in 2004 and will reach the end of its support life from the vendor in Calendar year 2014. The system must then either be upgraded or replaced. Staff will be evaluating alternatives.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name VOIP Phone System/Network Category Equipment - PW

Type Equipment


City Project Code


500,000 500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources500,000500,000Capital Equipment Lease

500,000 500,000Total




Contact Joe Theobald

DescriptionReplace the existing 800 MHz trunked radio city radio system.

Project # TC-14-002

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationExisting radio system was installed in 1993 and, although upgraded over the years, is now reaching end of life. New radio systems allow simultaneous communication and better interagency coordination.

Useful Life 15 YearsProject Name 800 MHz Radio System Category Equipment - PW

Type Equipment


City Project Code


9,000,0009,000,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

500,000 9,000,000 9,500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources9,000,0009,000,000Capital Equipment Lease

500,000500,000Vehicle & Equipment Fund

500,000 9,000,000 9,500,000Total





DescriptionUpgrade to the existing network backbone with either leased fiber optic lines or new wireless system

Project # TC-15-003


JustificationVouice and data communications to all City sites is currently carried over a four site wireless radio system which has reached the end of it's useful life. The prlifieration of new devices requiring netowrk support including high resolution video surveillance requires increased bandwidth.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name Network communications replacement Category Equipment - PW

Type Equipment


City Project Code



5,000 565,000 570,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources565,000565,000Capital Equipment Lease

5,0005,000General Fund

5,000 565,000 570,000Total





DescriptionCitrix netscaler gateway equipment for remote network access

Project # TC-15-004


JustificationThe City has usccessfully implemented virtual desktops to replace PC's, the network scaler gateway will allow the delivery of network applications to remote users through laptops, tablets or other hand held devices.

Useful Life 5-7 YearsProject Name Netscaler Gateway Category Equipment - PW

Type Equipment


City Project Code


105,000 105,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources105,000105,000Not funded current year !

105,000 105,000Total





DescriptionProvide offsite duplicate storage area network and server replication for proper continuity of operation and disaster recovery. This would be done either interanally or through a third party vendor.

Project # TC15-005

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationCurrently all network servers and storage are located in the Public Safety Building. Although storage files are routinely backed up on tape, these backups take several hours, reduce network speeds and have proven to be unreliable. The network server infrastrucure currently replicates between machines on site. This works well provided that the server room remians in tact. Should the server room or public safety builidng be compromised, there is no back up system and the City would be without any network services.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name Offsite Network Disaster Recovery Category Unassigned

Type Unassigned


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures10,00010,000Planning/Design50,00050,000Construction/Maintenance

350,00050,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Other

110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 410,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources400,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000General Fund110,000110,000Not funded current year !

110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 510,000Total





DescriptionReplacements and upgrades to the Council Chambers audio visual presentation and recording systems.

Project # TC-15-006


JustificationMany of the components in the existing Council Chambers audio visuoal system are over 15 years old and are starting to fail. Certain new technologies are not supported by the current system.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade Category Unassigned

Type Equipment


City Project Code


130,000130,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings

5,000 130,000 135,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources25,00025,000Corporate Grant

110,000110,000General Fund

25,000 110,000 135,000Total



Department 6 Convention Center2015 2019thru


DescriptionConstruction of a 30,000 square foot addition to the existing main Exhibit Hall A/B.

Project # 14-CC-003


JustificationExisting and future events are anticipated to need additional exhibit space in the Convention Center to accommodate growth.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code



100,000 10,000,000 10,100,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources5,000,0005,000,000Bond Financing - OCCC Food

Tax100,000100,000General Fund

5,000,0005,000,000State Grants

100,000 10,000,000 10,100,000Total



Department 6 Convention Center2015 2019thru


DescriptionConstruction of an elevator and code compliant exit stairs at the Life Saving Museum

Project # 15-CC-001


JustificationCurrently the only access to the second floor of the Life Saving Museum is via a steep narrow stair case. These stairs would not meet current code requirements and there is no second means of egress. There is no access to the second floor for the disabled. Disabled visitors for the museum can see second floor exhibits via a video tape monitor only.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs Category Buildings

Type Improvement


City Project Code



80,000 420,000 500,000Total


500,000 500,000Total



Department 7 Airport2015 2019thru

Contact Jamie Giandomenico

DescriptionThis project will consist of a comprehensive survey, analysis and design for the removal of obstructions at Ocean City Municipal Airport that exceed FAA obstruction standards. This effort will be focused primarily on the West and South sections of Airport Property, but will include as many “problem areas” as is feasible given the project duration and budget. This effort will include the replanting of FAA approved slow/non-growing plant material in selected areas.

Project # 14-AI-002


JustificationRemoval of on-airport obstructions is a safety of flight issue, which if left uncompleted may expose the Town of Ocean City to additional liability. Failure to remove obstructions in accordance with 14 CFR Part 77 will also jeopardize the Airports future eligibility for additional Federal funding.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal Category Airport

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


170,000 600,000 770,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources692,518152,518 540,000Federal Grants38,4738,473 30,000General Fund38,4738,473 30,000State Grants

169,464 600,000 769,464Total





DescriptionThis project will replace taxiway “A”, which has reached the end of its service life despite expensive and continuous maintenance attention. The existing taxiway will be demolished, and a new one constructed approximately 60’ north of its current location. The new location will satisfy the FAA design guide requirements for taxiway/runway separation. Included in this effort will be lighting upgrades, and minor changes in geometry to meet current FAA standards. The design of taxiway “A” will include the expansion of the adjacent parking ramp to “reclaim” capacity in the form of parking spaces, which were deleted to meet taxi lane requirements in the course of the final ALP preparation. While concurrent design was possible and economical, it will be constructed separately.

Project # 14-AI-004


JustificationTaxiway pavement will not be economical to maintain past the near future. Irrespective of pavement condition, failure to relocate Taxiway “A” to meet FAA standards will jeopardize the Airports future funding eligibility. As aircraft are extremely sensitive to foreign object damage, the further deterioration of the pavement surface may expose the Town of Ocean City to additional liability if aircraft sustain damage from debris or roughness associated with the failing pavement.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Taxiway A Relocation Category Airport

Type Improvement


City Project Code



700,000 3,620,000 4,320,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources3,888,000630,000 3,258,000Federal Grants

216,00035,000 181,000General Fund216,00035,000 181,000State Grants

700,000 3,620,000 4,320,000Total





DescriptionRehabilitate RWY 14/32 will overlay/ repave runway 14/32 east of the 02/20 intersection. This project will include lighting and electrical upgrades; underground wiring vaults, signage and replacement of Runway 14/32 Visual Approach Slope Indicators with Pulse Light Approach Slope Indicators. Runway End Identifier Lights and basic approach lighting will also be included. The runway surface will be FAA P-401 likely placed in two 2” lifts. A grooved primary surface for improved braking is included in the project

Project # 14-AI-005


JustificationRunway 14/32 pavement surface and pavement section has reached the end of its service life. Maintaining the pavement and lighting systems is uneconomical in all but the short term. Failure to overlay/ rehab Runway 14/32 will result in the downgrading of the runway surface by the FAA and MAA, which will result in aircraft avoiding the airport in favor of local facilities with better pavements. Aircraft are sensitive to foreign object damage. The Town of Ocean City may be exposed to additional liability should the pavement be allowed to deteriorate to a point in which surface debris damages aircraft.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 Category Airport

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


550,000 550,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources495,000495,000Federal Grants27,50027,500General Fund27,50027,500State Grants

550,000 550,000Total





DescriptionThis project will construct an additional 3-bay clear span airplane hangar at the Ocean City Municipal Airport. Location of this hangar has been approved on the Airports recent Master-plan Update. This project will include the construction of a stub taxiway to connect the West ramp with taxiway “A”. Location for the building is at the extreme west end of the main ramp. It is designed to accommodate aircraft up to 50’ wingspan.

Project # 15-AI-001


JustificationOcean City Municipal Airport currently has a waiting list with enough names to virtually guarantee 100% occupancy of the above hangars several times over. Aircraft that cannot be accommodated at Ocean City Airport will use services and facilities at other local airports with a commensurate loss of revenue.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Hangar K Category Airport

Type Improvement


City Project Code



850,000 850,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources850,000850,000Bond Financing - User fee

supported

850,000 850,000Total





DescriptionOcean City Municipal Airport is currently served by several wells, all with very poor quality water. The airport sewer is served via septic tanks and a doesed mound system which limits growth at the airport and will soon need equipment replacement and potential construction of a new field. This project will connect the Airport terminal and tenant hangars to a public water & sewer infrastructure currently located adjacent to Airport Road. A water main connection near the location of the Lion’s Club would continue down Airport Road and intercept the connections for the entire Airport. Bulk of project cost would be in the placement and connection of underground water & sewer lines. Abandonment of existing wells and septci field in accordance local regulations is included in this project.

Project # 16-AI-001


JustificationConnection to a public water & sewer system will allow the airport to realize a broad range of benefits. It will dramatically reduce the amount of staff time, material, and maintenance required of the six bathrooms on the airfield. The above public water connection will allow for the removal of the failing water treatment system. Public sewer connection will allow for abandonement of the existing septic field, and pump equipment which is nearing the end of it's useful life. In order to supply the terminal with sufficient water pressure to run a sprinkler system, a 10,000-gallon water tank is located inside the building. With a public water connection, this tank can be removed, freeing space for commercial tenants and reducing the cost of contract maintenance on high volume sprinkler pumps.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Airport Water & Sewer Connection Category Airport

Type Improvement


City Project Code



120,000 120,000Total


120,000 120,000Total





DescriptionThis project will construct a combination aircraft hangar and commercial office space building on the currently underutilized “long term parking lot”. Included in this project is the relocation of one section of perimeter fence. This unique building will take advantage of Airport Road frontage and air-side ramp access, and will be a premium commercial location for on-airport businesses.

Project # 16-AI-002


JustificationWith the construction of hangar “K” (2015) the Airport will have occupied all of the available space with airside (ramp) access. No additional space with access to the north ramp is available for development. The area currently designated “long term parking west” is historically underutilized, and is large enough for the construction of a combination Group I hangar/commercial bldg, currently there is a waiting list for commercial space on the airport, including terminal access. Given the waiting list for commercial space, 100% occupancy is virtually assured.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Hangar & Commercial Office Building Category Airport

Type Improvement


City Project Code



850,000 850,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources850,000850,000Bond Financing - User fee

supported

850,000 850,000Total





DescriptionThis project will construct extensions to the South edge of the North Terminal Ramp from stub Taxiway Alpha west to Taxiway Delta. These extensions will project south into the main Taxiway Alpha infield area. This project includes repainting taxi lines, and aircraft parking markings. Also included is installation of tie down anchors for approx. 20 aircraft parking spaces. The design for this project will be completed concurrently with the Relocate Taxiway “A” effort (2017) and the cost of design is inlcded under that project, for economy purposes. Per FAA programming, this project is for construction costs only.

Project # 17-AI-001


JustificationDuring the final stages of the design of the current Master Plan (2012), the taxi-lanes on the North Terminal Ramp area were redesigned to accommodate larger Group II aircraft (an FAA requirement). In order to provide adequate clearance for the above taxi-lanes, a large number of existing aircraft parking spaces will be eliminated. By extending the existing North Ramp boundary 10-20’ south, the majority of the eliminated parking spaces will be restored. Without these parking spaces, the Airport will be unable to accommodate peak seasonal parking requirements.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Apron Expansion Category Street Construction

Type Improvement


City Project Code


1,700,000 1,700,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,530,0001,530,000Federal Grants

85,00085,000General Fund85,00085,000State Grants

1,700,000 1,700,000Total





DescriptionLocalizer antenna array for the LOC14 instrument apoproach does not meet current seperation standards for the approach end of runway 32. This project will consist of design and installation of the localizer array at a location to be determined. An RF study is currently underway (grant funded) to examine potential relocation sites with a decision to be rendered in 2014

Project # 17-AI-002


JustificationThe localizer must be moved to meet FAA design guide seperation Values. If the antenna is left in its current location, runway 14 would have to be shortened by approximately 350'. This reduction in length would devestate the airport's ability to serve larger aricraft in the group II category with commensurate economic loss.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Localizer Relocation Category Unassigned

Type Improvement


City Project Code


500,000 800,000 1,300,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,170,000450,000 720,000Federal Grants

65,00025,000 40,000General Fund65,00025,000 40,000State Grants

500,000 800,000 1,300,000Total



Department 90 Water2015 2019thru

Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionReplace and increase size of water mains:Undesignated water main upgrades

Project # 08-WA-001


JustificationTo increase fire fighting capabilities and to improve water quality

Useful Life 50 YearsProject Name Water Main Upgrades Category Utilities

Type Improvement


City Project Code WMAINS

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,500,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000Construction/Maintenance

300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,500,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000Water Fund

300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionSt Louis Avenue Water Main Phase I of III - 10 Street to 17th StreetSt Louis Avenue Water Main Phase II of III - 4th Street to 10th StreetSt Louis Avenue Water Main Phase III of III - North Division to 4th Street

Project # 11-WA-002

Priority 1 Critical

JustificationTo increase fire fighting capabilities and to improve water quality

Useful Life 50 YearsProject Name St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade Category Utilities

Type Improvement


City Project Code


350,000 350,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources350,000350,000Water Fund

350,000 350,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionWells are monitored and one to two wells are extensively examined and repaired each year.

Project # 11-WA-003


JustificationOcean City draws most of its water from the Ocean City aquifer (over 300') and the Manokin aquifer (over 400'). Wells are subject to corrosion and continual maintenance is required to preserve water quality and volume.

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name Well Rehabilitation Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures600,000120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000Construction/Maintenance

120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources600,000120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000Water Fund

120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionSandblasting, painting, and corrosion prevention of water storage towers and tanks. One tank or tower is painted each year.

Project # 11-WA-006


Justification

Useful Life 10 YearsProject Name Storage Towers and Tanks Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures3,575,000875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000Construction/Maintenance

875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 3,575,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources3,575,500875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000Water Fund

875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 3,575,500Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionThis work is necessary to ensure future safety of the Town’s water supply and to comply with current and future State and Federal drinking water standards.

Project # 14-WA-001


JustificationThe Town’s raw groundwater supply contains naturally occurring organic compounds which can combine with chlorine to cause the formation of potentially harmful disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Funding is needed for the next several years to enable research to be conducted and for physical improvements to be made to the water treatment plants and the treated water storage and distribution system to ensure that DBPs do not cause problems with the safety of the Town’s drinking water.

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Disinfection byproduct project Category Infrastructure Maintenance

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures800,000800,000 0 0Construction/Maintenance

800,000 0 0 800,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources800,000800,000 0 0Water Fund

800,000 0 0 800,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionPhase I of II - Conversion to automatic water meter reading

Project # 15-WA-001


JustificationTo update/improve current system

Useful LifeProject Name Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading Category Utilities

Type Unassigned


City Project Code


600,000 600,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources600,000600,000Water Fund

600,000 600,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionExtension of raw water main from 52nd to 66th Street to service proposed new treatment plant

Project # 16-WA-001


Justification

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Raw Water main Extension to 66th Category Utilities

Type Unassigned


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,450,000725,000 725,000Construction/Maintenance

725,000 725,000 1,450,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,450,000725,000 725,000Water Fund

725,000 725,000 1,450,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionPurchase of 67th St land from Sandpiper Energy for future water treatment plant

Project # 17-WA-001


JustificationIn accordance with the Gas Franchise, the Town of Ocean City, has First Right of Refusal and/or Option to Purchase the land currently owned by the Gas Company at 67th Street. Also, in accordance with the Franchise Agreement, they have until August of 2018 (Franchise Term of 10 years from May 7, 2007 plus 15 month, if necessary) to remove the above ground tank farm at that location. It is a known fact to the MCC that our intention is to purchase their property for the Water Department’s future site of the 66th Street Water Treatment Plant. In accordance with the appraised values of property that have been sold within the general area of 65th Street over the last few years, a value of $1,250,000 has been assigned to the land purchase for planning purposes. We had projected/planned to fund this need via a two year set-aside allocation of $625,000 per year FY’17 and FY’18 BUT do not feel it will be affordable under the current Rate Structure as a “pay as you go” funding effort. Additionally, the “overall” project will also involve the construction of a raw water main manifold line from 52nd to 66th Street, and the construction of the Treatment Plant itself. The project “as a whole” may be discussed to determine the best funding scenario

Useful Life 50 YearsProject Name 67th St Water Treatment Plant Land Category Land acquisition & improvem

Type Improvement


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures00Planning/Design

1,250,000625,000 625,000Land Acquisition

0 625,000 625,000 1,250,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,250,0000 625,000 625,000Water Fund

0 625,000 625,000 1,250,000Total




Contact Howard Iman

DescriptionMisc upgrades to existing treatment plants

Project # 17-WA-002


JustificationRequired for permit compliance and to maintain existing infrastrucure

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name Treatment Plant Upgrades Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures970,000360,000 610,000Construction/Maintenance

360,000 610,000 970,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources970,000360,000 610,000Water Fund

360,000 610,000 970,000Total




Contact

DescriptionConstruction of a new 1 million gallon water tank at the First Street and St. Louis Ave pump station property. Tank would replace existing tanks at Worcester Street and 15th Streets

Project # 17-WA-003

Priority n/a

JustificationNew tank will replace existing tanks located at Worcester Street lot and 15th street lot. This will recude maintenance costs, free up more valuable property for other city uses, and is a better location for system hydraulics.

Useful LifeProject Name First Street Water Tank Category Unassigned

Type Unassigned


City Project Code


4,295,0002,022,500 2,022,500 250,000Construction/Maintenance

165,000 2,022,500 2,022,500 250,000 4,460,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources4,295,0004,295,000Bond Financing - Water Fees

165,000165,000Water Fund

165,000 4,295,000 4,460,000Total



Department 91 Wastewater2015 2019thru

Contact Charlie Felin

DescriptionReplace or repair failing sewer lines to maintain integrity of collection system

Project # 07-WW-004


JustificationSewer lines and manholes that are worn and failing require repair or replacement in order to avoid blockages, structural collapse, sanitary sewer overflows, etc. The current inventory of sewer pipes known to need repair or replacement that are beneath the streets that have recently been paved is approximately 10,000 linear feet. In addition it is known that there is a substantial amount of old asbestos concrete pipe underground which, due to known age and related deterioration issues with this type of pipe, also needs to be lined or replaced. The funds allocated for this purpose will enable this rehabilitation work to be performed to ensure that the underground network of sewer pipes and manholes remains in good working condition.

Useful Life 40 YearsProject Name Wastewater Mains Category Utilities

Type Improvement


City Project Code wwmains

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures12,500,000500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000Construction/Maintenance

500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 12,500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources12,000,0003,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000Bond Financing - Wastewater

fees500,000500,000Wastewater Fund

500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 12,500,000Total





DescriptionDesign and Construct an additional secondary clarifier at wastewater treatment plant

Project # 09-WW-002


JustificationThe secondary clarifiers collectively perform a vital process to enable the WWTP to maintain compliance with effluent standards. The units operate in parallel, and all three of the existing units are required to be in continuous operation during the summer season in order to treat the high flow volume. A fourth clarifier is proposed to provide the WWTP with redundancy and the ability to maintain permit compliance in the event of the failure of one of the units. The addition of another clarifier will also enhance the performance of this aspect of the WWTP and improve its ability to comply with current and future regulatory standards.

Useful Life 30 YearsProject Name 4th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements Category Utilities

Type Improvement


City Project Code


5,500,000 5,500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources5,500,0005,500,000Bond Financing - Wastewater

fees

5,500,000 5,500,000Total





DescriptionReplace chlornation / dechlorination systems with a technology that utilizes less hazardous chemicals.

Project # 12-WW-002


JustificationThe gas chlorine and gas sulfur dioxide chemical that are currently in use at the plant are highly hazardous chemicals. Technologies exist at this time that would allow the disinfection process to be accomplished with the use of less hazardous chemicals, thus reducing the potential exposure of staff as well as the users of the planned public boat ramp that will be located adjacent to the WWTP in the near future.

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Effluent Disinfection System Upgrade Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


1,320,000 1,320,000Total





DescriptionReplace sewer mains and manholes.

Project # 12-WW-003


JustificationReplace worn sewer mains and manholes in St. Louis & side streets as required. This is part of the planned street improvement project for St. Louis Ave from N. Division Street to 17th Street.

Useful LifeProject Name St Louis Avenue Improvements Category Utilities

Type Unassigned


City Project Code WWLOUI


275,000 275,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources275,000275,000Wastewater Fund

275,000 275,000Total





DescriptionInstall a structural liner within the section of the Ocean outfall pipe that lies beneath the beach.

Project # 15-WW-001


JustificationThe Ocean outfall was constructed in 1968. The portion of the pipe that lies to the ocean side of the air release valve (ARV) at the east end of 64th street consists of approximately 4,200 linear feet of 30 inch prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP). The first 340 linear feet of the PCCP, which extends eastward from the ARV to the shoreline, was originally designed and installed to support 10 feet of wet sand cover. However, with the shoreline enhancement that has occurred in Ocean City in the time since 1968, the sand load over the pipe has been documented to be up to a maximum depth of 21 feet underneath the dunes. Therefore, in consideration of the original design and the age of the pipe, taking action to install a structural liner to reinforce the pipe would be a prudent safeguard measure to undertake so to ensure the continued use of this vital infrastructure component.

Useful Life 15 YearsProject Name Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Expenditures1,100,0001,000,000 100,000Construction/Maintenance

1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,100,0001,100,000Wastewater Fund

1,100,000 1,100,000Total





DescriptionReplace east fournier press

Project # 15-WW-005

Priority 1 Critical

Justificationequipment needs replacing, end of useful life

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Fournier press Category Utilities

Type Equipment


City Project Code


350,000 350,000Total


350,000 350,000Total





DescriptionMCCA replacements

Project # 16-WW-001


Justificationend of useful life

Useful Life 15 YearsProject Name Primary influent building MCCA Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


425,000 425,000Total


425,000 425,000Total





DescriptionRepairs and upgrade of SCADA system in oxygen building to improve remote control of processes

Project # 17-WW-001


JustificationEquipment needs to be replaced as new equipment has improved functions

Useful Life 15 YearsProject Name Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades Category Utilities

Type Maintenance


City Project Code


600,000 600,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources600,000600,000Bond Financing - Wastewater

fees

600,000 600,000Total





DescriptionReplace entire underground pumping station and add stand-by power.

Project # 18-WW-001


JustificationEquipment reaching the end of it's useful life due to wear and corrosion. Stand-by capability is an MDE requirement. Adding a stand-by pump will prevent sewage back-ups during power outages. System reliability must be improved upon. Centrifugal pumps will be replaced with submersible pumps.

Useful Life 20 YearsProject Name 28th Street Pumping Station Category Infrastructure Maintenance

Type Equipment


City Project Code


425,000 425,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources425,000425,000Bond Financing - Wastewater

fees

425,000 425,000Total





DescriptionChloring contact chamber expansion

Project # 18-WW-002


Justification

Useful Life 25 YearsProject Name Expansion of chlorine contact chamber Category Utilities

Type Improvement


City Project Code



300,000 1,200,000 1,500,000Total

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Funding Sources1,500,0001,500,000Bond Financing - Wastewater

fees

1,500,000 1,500,000Total



PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT

2015 2019thru

Total2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Department Project# Priority

1 Public Safety08-PS-05 6,000,000600,000 5,400,000Mid-Town Fire Station 315-PS-001 150,000150,000Public Safety Building Generator Replacement 315-PS-002 300,00010,000 290,000Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower 3

6,450,000760,000 5,690,0001 Public Safety Total

3 General Public Works15-HS-002 840,00040,000 800,000Replacement of Whiteside Facility 315-HS-003 160,00080,000 80,000City Wide Security Improvements 2

1,000,000120,000 880,0003 General Public Works Total

31 Municipal Complex Expansion07-TR-001 1,800,0001,800,000Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 315-HS-001 00 0Relocation of DPW Yard 3

1,800,0001,800,000 031 Municipal Complex Expansion Total

32 Highways and Streets08-HS-002 60,00060,00094th Street Landscape Strips 408-HS-003 2,400,000600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000Caine Woods Street Improvements 408-HS-006 5,147,0002,715,000 2,432,000 0 0Undergrounding of Utilities 308-HS-010 12,000,0002,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000Street Improvements & Overlays 109-HS-002 1,731,0001,731,000St. Louis Ave Improvements 309-HS-012 2,000,000400,000 1,600,000Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 3

23,338,0006,446,000 6,092,000 3,600,000 4,000,000 3,200,00032 Highways and Streets Total

4 Recreation and Parks08-RP-001 500,000500,000Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier 408-RP-006 820,334820,334Skate Park Renovations & Expansion 208-RP-008 3,515,000140,000 1,375,000 2,000,000Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements 209-RP-003 100,000100,000NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation 411-RP-002 15,00015,000Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction 412-RP-001 180,000180,000NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary 412-RP-003 155,00095,000 60,000NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements 314-RP-006 265,00085,000 95,000 85,000Playground Replacements 215-RP-001 1,200,0001,200,000Eagles Landing Irrigation System 1

6,750,3341,435,000 2,255,334 2,685,000 95,000 280,0004 Recreation and Parks Total

51 Environmental08-EV-001 1,850,000250,000 500,000 500,000 600,000Canal Dredging 211-MC-009 750,000750,000Boat ramp at 64th Street 114-EV-002 175,000175,000Public Works Yard Bulkhead 3



14-EV-003 2,000,0002,000,000Chicago Ave Bulkhead 3

4,775,000425,000 1,250,000 500,000 600,000 2,000,00051 Environmental Total

52Technology & CommunicationsTC-14-001 500,000500,000VOIP Phone System/Network 3TC-14-002 9,500,000500,000 9,000,000800 MHz Radio System 1TC-15-003 570,0005,000 565,000Network communications replacement 2TC-15-004 105,000105,000Netscaler Gateway 3TC15-005 410,000110,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1TC-15-006 135,0005,000 130,000Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2

11,220,000225,000 1,795,000 9,100,000 100,00052Technology & Communications Total

6 Convention Center14-CC-003 10,100,000100,000 10,000,000Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 315-CC-001 500,00080,000 420,000Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs 3

10,600,000180,000 10,420,0006 Convention Center Total

7 Airport14-AI-002 770,000170,000 600,000Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal 314-AI-004 4,320,000700,000 3,620,000Taxiway A Relocation 314-AI-005 550,000550,000Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 315-AI-001 850,000850,000Hangar K 316-AI-001 120,000120,000Airport Water & Sewer Connection 316-AI-002 850,000850,000Hangar & Commercial Office Building 417-AI-001 1,700,0001,700,000Apron Expansion 417-AI-002 1,300,000500,000 800,000Localizer Relocation 3

10,460,000120,000 170,000 2,650,000 5,270,000 2,250,0007 Airport Total

90 Water08-WA-001 1,500,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000Water Main Upgrades 311-WA-002 350,000350,000St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade 111-WA-003 600,000120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000Well Rehabilitation 211-WA-006 3,575,000875,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000Storage Towers and Tanks 214-WA-001 800,000800,000 0 0Disinfection byproduct project 315-WA-001 600,000600,000Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading 416-WA-001 1,450,000725,000 725,000Raw Water main Extension to 66th 317-WA-001 1,250,0000 625,000 625,00067th St Water Treatment Plant Land 317-WA-002 970,000360,000 610,000Treatment Plant Upgrades 317-WA-003 4,460,000165,000 2,022,500 2,022,500 250,000First Street Water Tank n/a

15,555,0002,610,000 3,477,500 3,742,500 3,305,000 2,420,00090 Water Total

91 Wastewater07-WW-004 12,500,000500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000Wastewater Mains 209-WW-002 5,500,0005,500,0004th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements 312-WW-002 1,320,0001,320,000Effluent Disinfection System Upgrade 312-WW-003 275,000275,000St Louis Avenue Improvements 315-WW-001 1,100,0001,000,000 100,000Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement 315-WW-005 350,000350,000Fournier press 116-WW-001 425,000425,000Primary influent building MCCA 217-WW-001 600,000600,000Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades 218-WW-001 425,000425,00028th Street Pumping Station 2



18-WW-002 1,500,000300,000 1,200,000Expansion of chlorine contact chamber 3

23,995,0002,445,000 4,425,000 9,200,000 3,725,000 4,200,00091 Wastewater Total

GRAND TOTAL 115,943,33413,706,000 21,564,834 43,537,500 22,785,000 14,350,000



PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE

2015 2019thru

TotalSource Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Bond Financing - General Fund

08-PS-05 6,000,0006,000,000Mid-Town Fire Station 308-RP-001 500,000500,000Sunset Park - Phase 2 - Pier 408-RP-006 820,334820,334Skate Park Renovations & Expansion 208-RP-008 3,515,0003,515,000Downtown Recreation Complex Improvements 209-HS-012 2,000,0002,000,000Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 314-EV-003 2,000,0002,000,000Chicago Ave Bulkhead 315-CC-001 500,000500,000Life Saving Museum Elevator and Exit Stairs 315-HS-002 840,000840,000Replacement of Whiteside Facility 3

16,175,3345,675,334 500,000 8,000,000 2,000,000Bond Financing - General Fund Total

Bond Financing - OCCC Food Tax

14-CC-003 5,000,0005,000,000Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 3

5,000,0005,000,000Bond Financing - OCCC Food Tax Total

Bond Financing - User fee supported

15-AI-001 850,000850,000Hangar K 315-RP-001 1,200,0001,200,000Eagles Landing Irrigation System 116-AI-002 850,000850,000Hangar & Commercial Office Building 4

2,900,0001,200,000 850,000 850,000Bond Financing - User fee supported Total

Bond Financing - Wastewater fees

07-WW-004 12,000,0003,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000Wastewater Mains 209-WW-002 5,500,0005,500,0004th Secondary Clarifier & Improvements 317-WW-001 600,000600,000Oxygen Bldg SCADA upgrades 218-WW-001 425,000425,00028th Street Pumping Station 218-WW-002 1,500,0001,500,000Expansion of chlorine contact chamber 3

20,025,0003,000,000 9,100,000 4,925,000 3,000,000Bond Financing - Wastewater fees Total

Bond Financing - Water Fees

17-WA-003 4,295,0004,295,000First Street Water Tank n/a

4,295,0004,295,000Bond Financing - Water Fees Total

Capital Equipment Lease

TC-14-001 500,000500,000VOIP Phone System/Network 3TC-14-002 9,000,0009,000,000800 MHz Radio System 1TC-15-003 565,000565,000Network communications replacement 2



10,065,0001,065,000 9,000,000Capital Equipment Lease Total

Corporate Grant

TC-15-006 25,00025,000Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2

25,00025,000Corporate Grant Total

Federal Grants

09-HS-012 00Philadelphia Ave Transit Lane 314-AI-002 692,518152,518 540,000Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal 314-AI-004 3,888,000630,000 3,258,000Taxiway A Relocation 314-AI-005 495,000495,000Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 317-AI-001 1,530,0001,530,000Apron Expansion 417-AI-002 1,170,000450,000 720,000Localizer Relocation 3

7,775,518152,518 1,620,000 3,978,000 2,025,000Federal Grants Total

General Fund

07-TR-001 600,000600,000Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 308-EV-001 1,850,000250,000 500,000 600,000 500,000Canal Dredging 208-HS-002 60,00060,00094th Street Landscape Strips 408-HS-003 2,400,000600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000Caine Woods Street Improvements 408-HS-006 2,432,0002,432,000 0 0Undergrounding of Utilities 308-HS-010 9,000,0002,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000Street Improvements & Overlays 111-RP-002 290,00015,000 275,000Parks Garage Storage Expan Design/Construction 412-RP-001 180,000180,000NSP - Bio-Retention Improvements: North Boundary 412-RP-003 155,000155,000NSP Parking Lot Repairs and Improvements 314-AI-002 38,4738,473 30,000Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal 314-AI-004 216,00035,000 181,000Taxiway A Relocation 314-AI-005 27,50027,500Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 314-CC-003 100,000100,000Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 314-EV-002 175,000175,000Public Works Yard Bulkhead 315-HS-001 00Relocation of DPW Yard 315-HS-003 160,00080,000 80,000City Wide Security Improvements 215-PS-001 150,000150,000Public Safety Building Generator Replacement 315-PS-002 300,000300,000Public Safety Building Chillers and Cooling Tower 316-AI-001 120,000120,000Airport Water & Sewer Connection 317-AI-001 85,00085,000Apron Expansion 417-AI-002 65,00025,000 40,000Localizer Relocation 3TC-15-003 5,0005,000Network communications replacement 2TC15-005 400,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1TC-15-006 110,000110,000Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 2

18,918,9732,550,000 6,745,473 3,620,000 3,916,000 2,087,500General Fund Total

Not funded current year !

08-HS-006 2,715,0002,715,000Undergrounding of Utilities 3TC-15-004 105,000105,000Netscaler Gateway 3TC15-005 110,000110,000Offsite Network Disaster Recovery 1

2,930,0002,930,000Not funded current year ! Total



Prior project balance

09-HS-002 1,731,0001,731,000St. Louis Ave Improvements 311-MC-009 750,000750,000Boat ramp at 64th Street 1

2,481,0001,731,000 750,000Prior project balance Total

Property Sale

15-HS-001 00Relocation of DPW Yard 3

00Property Sale Total

State Grants

07-TR-001 1,200,0001,200,000Municipal Facility - 65th St Public Works Complex 314-AI-002 38,4738,473 30,000Runway 02/20 7 14/32 Obstruction Removal 314-AI-004 216,00035,000 181,000Taxiway A Relocation 314-AI-005 27,50027,500Rehabilitate Runway 14/32 314-CC-003 5,000,0005,000,000Convention Center Hall A-B Expansion 314-RP-006 265,00085,000 95,000 85,000Playground Replacements 217-AI-001 85,00085,000Apron Expansion 417-AI-002 65,00025,000 40,000Localizer Relocation 3

6,896,9731,208,473 5,175,000 316,000 197,500State Grants Total

State Loan

09-RP-003 100,000100,000NSP - Soccer Field Light Renovation 4

100,000100,000State Loan Total

User fees

08-HS-010 3,000,0000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000Street Improvements & Overlays 1

3,000,0000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000User fees Total

Vehicle & Equipment Fund

TC-14-002 500,000500,000800 MHz Radio System 1

500,000500,000Vehicle & Equipment Fund Total

Wastewater Fund

07-WW-004 500,000500,000Wastewater Mains 212-WW-003 275,000275,000St Louis Avenue Improvements 315-WW-001 1,100,0001,100,000Ocean Outfall Lining Reinforcement 315-WW-005 350,000350,000Fournier press 116-WW-001 425,000425,000Primary influent building MCCA 2

2,650,0001,125,000 1,525,000Wastewater Fund Total

Water Fund

08-WA-001 1,500,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000Water Main Upgrades 311-WA-002 350,000350,000St Louis Ave Water Main Upgrade 111-WA-003 600,000120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000Well Rehabilitation 2



11-WA-006 3,575,500875,500 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000Storage Towers and Tanks 214-WA-001 800,000800,000 0 0Disinfection byproduct project 315-WA-001 600,000600,000Conversion To Automatic Water Meter Reading 416-WA-001 1,450,000725,000 725,000Raw Water main Extension to 66th 317-WA-001 1,250,0000 625,000 625,00067th St Water Treatment Plant Land 317-WA-002 970,000360,000 610,000Treatment Plant Upgrades 317-WA-003 165,000165,000First Street Water Tank n/a

11,260,5002,610,500 1,455,000 1,720,000 3,055,000 2,420,000Water Fund Total

114,998,29812,171,500 27,371,798 37,685,000 26,040,000 11,730,000GRAND TOTAL



5. NEW BUSINESS

I. Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction of Single-lane Boat Ramp presented by City Engineer

TOWN OF

The White Marlin Capital of the World TO: The Honorable Mayor, Council President and Members of Council FROM: David L. Recor, ICMA-CM, City Manager RE: Boat ramp project at south end of Seabay Drive and 64th Street DATE: August 7, 2014 ISSUE(S): Authorization to proceed with single-lane boat ramp SUMMARY: Request Mayor and Council authorization to proceed with permit

application to build a single-lane boat ramp while condemnation proceedings are concluded.

FISCAL IMPACT: To be determined. RECOMMENDATION: Move forward with permit to construct single-lane ramp.

More Livable Community for Residents

ALTERNATIVES: Do not obtain permit at this time. RESPONSIBLE STAFF: Terence McGean, City Engineer COORDINATED WITH: Not applicable ATTACHMENT(S): None

Agenda Item # 5I


Documents

August 12 2014 Complete Agenda