Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Automating MRM-Based Protein Quantification
Tasso Miliotis
AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal
Translational Science iMED CVMD
Webinar - Agilent Technologies Feb 25, 2015
Outline
• Introduction
• Why MRM/MS?
• Sample Prep and Analysis
• Strategy Overview
• Novel Sample Prep Automation via the AssayMAP Bravo Platform
• Development - SPE Optimization (sorbent and elution solvents)
• Implementation in Targeted Quantitative Proteomics Studies
• Results
• Conclusions and Outlook
Limitations of Immunoassays
• Immunoassays exist for~2,000 proteins (10% of proteome) but exhibit:
• extremely variable quality and limited specificity
• degraded performance when multiplexed without extensive optimization
• 50-100 μL plasma per analyte
• Generation of an immunoassay for a new target requires:
• two epitope-matched antibodies
• analyte-specific optimization of components and workflow
• time
• $$
Many Immunoassays Suffer From Unrecognized Interferences
Blocking Complex
False Negatives
Autoantibody Cleaved Ag HAMA
False Positive
Courtesy of Dr. N.L. Anderson
What forms the immunoassay sandwich - or prevents its formation - is not directly visualized:
Immunoassays do not provide a
molecular microscope
Targeted Quant via MRM/MS
• Potential for high specificity, sensitivity, and analyte multiplexing.
Gillette MA et al. Nature Methods 10, 2013, 28.
~200 proteins quantified in one chromatographic run
Benefits of Internal Standards With MRM
• 13C/15N-labeled analogs of the unlabeled analytes help correct for ion suppression and matrix effects.
• 13C/15N labeled standards are chemically identical to unlabeled counterpart and are distinguishable by m/z only.
• Labeled and unlabeled forms behave identically with respect to chromatographic retention, electrospray ionization, and gas-phase fragmentation.
Kuzyk MA et al. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 2009, 1860.
Time Time
Inte
nsity
Inte
nsity
Fibrinogen gamma chain Gelsolin
Natural (NAT) Synthetic (SIS)
Experimental Workflow Plasma Matrix
Proteolytic Digest
Plasma Digest with Labeled Peptides
Concentrated and Desalted Peptides
reduce, alkylate, quench, digest
solid phase extraction
13C/15N Labeled Tryptic Peptides
Line Spectra and XICs 1290 Infinity UHPLC with 6490 QqQ (Agilent)
RPLC-MRM/MS
Protein Quantitation
Data Analysis (Standard Curves with Linear Regression)
lower and upper LOQs dynamic range regression info. endogenous protein conc. precision
Afamin (P43652) Beta-2-glycoprotein I (P02749) Haptoglobin (P00738) Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin
(P01011) Ceruloplasmin (P00450) Hemopexin (P02790)
Alpha-1B-glycoprotein (P04217) Clusterin (P10909) Heparin cofactor II (P05546)
Alpha-2-antiplasmin (P08697) Coagulation factor XII (P00748)
Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain (P19827)
Angiotensinogen (P01019) Complement C3 (P01024) Kininogen-1 (P01042)
Antithrombin-III (P01008) Complement C4-B (P0C0L5) Plasminogen (P00747)
Apolipoprotein A-I (P02647) Complement component C9 (P02748) Retinol-binding protein 4 (P02753)
Apolipoprotein A-II (P02652) Complement factor B (P00751) Serum albumin (P02768)
Apolipoprotein A-IV (P06727) Complement factor H (P08603) Transthyretin (P02766)
Apolipoprotein B-100 (P04114) Fibrinogen alpha chain (P02671) Vitamin D-binding protein (P02774)
Apolipoprotein C-I (P02654) Fibrinogen beta chain (P02675) Vitronectin (P04004)
Apolipoprotein E (P02649) Gelsolin (P06396)
35 Target Protein Panel for Evaluation
Concentration Range: 4 orders of magnitude Protein MW: 7 kDa (Apolipoprotein C-I) to 513 kDa (Apolipoprotein B-100)
Quantotypic Target Peptides
VGYVSGWGR (Haptoglobin, P00738)
General Peptide Details
SIS Peptides
Synthesis ∙ 35 tryptic peptides ∙ C-terminal, 13C/15N-labels ∙ Fmoc chemistry at 5 µmol scale
Purification and Characterization ∙ RP-HPLC-MS ∙ MALDI-TOF-MS & AAA ∙ CZE 95% average purity
QC Standardization Kits
Supplied with each Kit:
• Standards and additional components.
• Detailed SOPs and video.
• LC-MS conditions and parameters.
• Reference values.
• Performance quality guide.
• Analysis software – QUALIS.
Monthly QC Daily QC
LC-MS Platform Assessment Kit (#1)
LCMSPKM-AG6490S-1 mo
www.mrmproteomics.com
LCMSPKD-AG6490S-1 wk
UHPLC-MRM/MS LC separation
∙ 10 µg column load
∙ RP-UHPLC column (2.1 x 150 mm) ∙ 0.4 mL/min
∙ 27 min gradient
MRM Detection ∙ dynamic mode
∙ 3 transitions/peptide
∙ 1 min detection window
∙ 1 acquisition method/run
10 µg plasma digest on-column 100 fmol balanced SIS mix on-column
NAT peptides SIS peptides
Overview of Data Analysis Strategy
Protein Quantitation via Peptide Std Curves
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7
~1:1 of SIS:NAT
∙ Use balanced SIS mixes since give lower analytical variation.
∙ Protein concs (NATconc) determined from regression equation of control.
∙ RR is measured from the sample, while SIS concentration, slope, and y-intercept are fixed values.
Percy AJ et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1844, 2014, 917.
Automated Analysis via Qualis-SIS
[Calculated SIS] [Actual SIS]
x 100%
Qualification Criteria
Mohammed Y et al. J. Proteome Res. 2015 (PMID: 25546269).
Automated extraction of attributes and performance
metrics in just seconds.
Target Customer AssayMap Technology Components
Microchromatography Cartridges quantitative binding & elution
Positive Displacement Pipetting Syringes interface directly with cartridges and enable precise, controlled liquid flow through cartridges with no air bubbles to disrupt binding
Automated workflows designed for analytical chemists Simple User Interface Uses customer language - not automation language
15 Author | 00 Month Year Set area descriptor | Sub level 1
AssayMAP Technology
Each AssayMAP cartridge is slurry packed, back-pressure tested, and inspected for voids
Manual vs Automated Protocol Analyzing 50 samples
1 • Sodium Deoxycholate (Na-DOC)
2 • TCEP
3 • Iodoacetamide
4 • DTT
5 • Trypsination
6 • Addition of SIS peptides
7 • Precipitate Na-DOC
8 • Centrifugation
9 • Supernatant Manual SPE
10 • Lyophilization
11 • Rehydrate LC-MS/MS analysis
Man
ual w
ork:
4
h, D
ay 1
1 • Urea
2 • TCEP
3 • Iodoacetamide
4 • TCEP + Dilution
5 • Trypsination
6 • Addition of SIS peptides
6 • SPE LC-MS/MS analysis
Assa
yMAP
: 1
.5h,
Day
1
Man
ual w
ork:
2
.5h,
Day
2
Overnight: 16h, Day 1
Assa
yMAP
: 1
h, D
ay 2
Overnight, Day 2
1h, Day 3
Preliminary SPE Optimization
• C18 cartridges (part no. G5496-60013) • stationary phase: silica-based C18 resin • 150 Å pore size, 16% carbon load, pH 2-8 stability
• RP-S cartridges (part no. G5496-60034) • stationary phase: underivatized polystyrene-divinylbenzene • 100 Å pores, 15-20 µm particles, pH 1-13 stability
Evaluated AssayMap-Compatible Cartridges
18 Author | 00 Month Year Set area descriptor | Sub level 1
Elution volumes (µL)
Acetonitrile (%)
Trifluoroacetic acid (0.1 %)
Formic acid (0.1%)
10/15/20 50 X
10/15/20 50 X
10/15/20 60 X
10/15/20 60 X
10/15/20 70 X
10/15/20 70 X
Overview of tested elution conditions (~100 µg of plasma digest loaded onto cartridges)
Comparison of C18 and RP-S cartridge Performance Elution conditions: 10 µL of 60% AcN, 0.1% FA (100 µg loaded)
Hydrophilic proteotypic peptides
Hydrophobic proteotypic peptides
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Rel
ativ
e R
espo
nse
C18RP-S
Action Solvent Volume (µL) Flow rate (µL/min) Activation 50% AcN 100 300
Equilibration 0.1% TFA 50 10
Loading Plasma digest (0.25 µg/µL) 400 10
Cup wash 0.1% TFA 50 10
Internal cartridge wash 0.1% TFA 50 10
Elution 70% AcN, 0.1% TFA 13* 5
The wells of the collecting plate wer already filled with 90 µL of acidified water (0.1% FA), final protein concentration typically ~1 µg/µL
Optimised SPE protocol C18 cartridges
*3 µL is discarded prior collection, i.e. 10 µL is collected
1 • Urea
2 • TCEP
3 • Iodoacetamide
4 • TCEP + Dilution
5 • Trypsination
6 • Addition of SIS peptides
6 • SPE
Automated MRM Workflow
LC-MRM analysis
20 identical samples subjected to fully automated MRM workflow
Automated MRM Workflow Repeatability
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 - 3 3 - 6 6 - 9 9 - 12 12 - 18
# of
Pro
tein
s
CV Range (%) for NAT conc.
23 Author | 00 Month Year Set area descriptor | Sub level 1
Standard Curve for Apolipoprotein A-1 in Reference Plasma
LOQ: 16 fmol/µL
Dynamic range: 10000
Results for [Apolipoprotein A-1] in Patient Plasma
CV = 4.5%
Summary Results LC-MRM measurements of 35 Human Plasma Proteins
Automated Workflow AssayMAP
Proteins quantified 35
Dynamic range 10000
Average coefficients of determination (r2) 0.99
LOQ range 5 fmol/µL – 11500 fmol/µL
CV* range (35 proteins measured across 20 identical samples) (1-12) %
*Alpha-1B-glycoprotein (CV = 15%)
Conclusions and Outlook • MRM with SIS peptide approach has emerged as a popular and precise
technique for protein quant of candidate protein biomarkers
• Bravo AssayMAP platform merits:
• Simple automation (no programming skills required)
• Frees time for skilled labor
• High-throughput (96-384 samples)
• Unique liquid-driven elution enabling 100x enrichment
• Excellent precision and repeatability
• Automated sample preparation for automated MRM protein quant:
• Biomarker Assessment → discovery and verification
• Future work:
• Investigation of the intra-/inter-assay precision
• Final comparison to the manual prep workflow will also be conducted
Acknowledgements
UVic-Genome BC Proteomics Centre Andrew Percy, PhD Nicole Sessler, PhD Christoph Borchers, PhD
MRM Proteomics
Christoph Borchers, PhD
Gary Kruppa, PhD
Gothenburg University
Martin Uhrbom Master Thesis Student
Agilent Technologies
Jason Russell, PhD
Steve Murphy, PhD Zach Van Den Heuvel, PhD
AssayMAP Bravo Platform
Steve Murphy, Ph.D.
AssayMAP technology components Target Customer
2
February 26, 2015
AssayMAP Bravo
AssayMAP Cartridge
Simple User Interface
AssayMAP Bravo Liquid Handler
• Features • 96 probe syringes • No air gap between probes and cartridge bed • Precision flow control across cartridge bed • Chromatographic behavior
• Benefits • Highly reproducible results • Quantitative binding and elution • Highly efficient washing • Very small elution volumes • Process 8-96 samples in parallel
AssayMAP Bravo Liquid Handler Head
AssayMAP Cartridges
Packed Bed
Top Frit
Bottom Frit
• Features • 5 µL packed bed • Each cartridge is back pressure tested • Cartridges are packed with a variety of resins
• Benefits • Highly reproducible results • Consistent capacity • Address multiple workflows
AssayMAP User Interface
• Features • Easy-to-use interface • Designed for scientists doing sample preparation not automation experts • Minimal user inputs required • Harmonized interfaces for different applications
• Benefits • Allow highly skilled scientist to do more value added work • Minimal training required • Rapid Adoption • Simple protocol transfer between people and sites.
Protein Sample Prep Workbench
February 26, 2015
7
Workflow Library
February 26, 2015
8
App Library
February 26, 2015
9
Utility Library
February 26, 2015
10
In-Solution Digestion user interface
February 26, 2015
11
Peptide Cleanup user interface
February 26, 2015
12
Peptide Cleanup user interface
February 26, 2015
13
AssayMAP digestion and cleanup workflow
February 26, 2015
14
Each step in the workflow was performed using the AssayMAP Bravo
AssayMAP tools for antibody purification: PA-W (Protein A) & PG-W (Protein G)
Input: • Particulate-free solutions
containing antibodies • Up to 96 samples (1 plate) • Up to 1 mL
Output: • Highly purified antibodies in
aqueous buffer • Elution volume as little as
10 µL Up to 100x
concentration factor
PA-W PG-W
February 26, 2015
15
Each step in the workflow can be performed with an AssayMAP Bravo
AssayMAP mAb quantification workflow
February 26, 2015
16
AssayMAP Bravo Platform Low variability • Minimize total workflow variability by more reducing sample prep • Reduce replicate number to increase throughput
Decrease labor • Minimize hands on time • Allow highly skilled scientist to do more value added work
Easy-to-use software control • Designed for non-automation experts • Minimal training required enabling rapid adoption • Simple person to person or site to site transfers
Single platform for a wide variety of sample prep needs
Solutions from Samples to Answers
Separation Preparation Analysis
February 26, 2015
18