Upload
buikien
View
228
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
AVL SERIES BATTERY BENCHMARKING
Getting from low level parameter to target orientation
3
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
4
ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTOMOTIVE
5 powertrain
elements
EXPERIENCE
65 years !
GLOBAL FOOTPRINT
30 engineering locations
>220 test beds Global customer support
network
ONEPARTNER
INNOVATION 1500granted patents
RESEARCH 10% of
turnover in-house R&D
GROWTH
SALES 1995:
0.15 billion €
2015:1.25 billion €
prev. 20161.41 billion €
STAFF
8.050 employees
65% engineers &
scientists
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1.000
1.100
1.200
1.300
1.400
1.500
Mio. €
5
6
• AVL high accuracy battery state calculation algorithms: SOx and battery cell wear detection -enable increased driving range, reduced charging time and extended operability
• AVL algorithms developed together with AVL battery chemistry team - strategic development partner for cell manufacturers
• AVL control solutions for battery system from 12V to 1000V – scalable for platform usage• 3rd generation integrated battery module controller and ASIC’s – Reduction: electronic
component number, costs, size and weight• Complete AVL battery control logic proven in production for several applications• AVL Semiconductor based main switches R&D Project to reduced the cost, increase robustness
and extend the modularity• AVL HV battery EMC simulation service of full parametrized battery model for several OEMs
with analog 3D model description, cell packages, SOC, aging, coupling effects of various geometrical aspects of enclosure, bus bars and battery modules
• AVL HV battery EMC simulation competence of H-field distribution of new batteries regarding ICNRIP requirements and exposure to human beings at various positions of the body
• HV battery EMC development assistance in terms of shielding, EE-box arrangement, wire routing LV, HV/LV attenuation and bus bar routing
• HV battery EMC full 3D and analog simulation of filters integrated within HV battery
HV-BATTERY
9
OVERVIEW OF AVL´S BATTERY ACTIVITIES
BMS & MCU development (SW & HW)
Electrical & Mechanical Design Engineering
Design for Production
Prototype build Generation 1&2 build-up
Validation target:
300.000 km cycle life
12 years calendar life
EMC targets fulfilled
System interaction ok
Test equipment for pack testing
turnkey solutions for battery labs
+
Module integration Thermal Simulation Mechanical Simulation Cell Modeling
Testing & Benchmarking
System validation
10
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
11
AVL runs a benchmarking program for xEV batteries:
approx. 4-5 vehicles (PHEV or EV) per year
10 work packages with benchmarking of ~240 single criteria
Derivation of >80 objectives for better comparability
Management view available through final evaluation in 8 attributes
Attributes, objectives and criteria System Design Values, Requirements, Specification
Standardized reports and documentation available
BENCHMARKING OF BATTERIES
Vehicle
Level
Assessment
Battery
Assessment
Tear
Down
Design
Concept
Identification
Production
Concept
Identification
Cost
study
12
AVL SERIES BATTERY BENCHMARKING -PROGRAM KICKED OFF JULY 2016
Vehicles in Planning for 2016/2017:
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Model 2015 (with OBD) – started – finishing Q1/17
Tesla Model X P90DL (X P100DL) - vehicle arrived – start within 10/2016
Chevrolet Bolt – start Q1 2017
BYD Tang – start Q1 2017
Audi Q7 PHEV – start Q2 2017
13
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
14
10 Work Packages (sequential):
Vehicle
Powertrain Tests
Vehicle Integration
Battery Data
Battery Testing
Tear Down
Module Tests
Cell Tests
Cost Analysis
Abuse Testing
Number of Criteria: ~240
CONNECTING WORKING PACKAGES TO BENCHMARK ATTRIBUTES
8 Attributes to be assessed:
AV
L o
bje
ctive
ra
tin
g
Connection:
How to?
15
AVL BENCHMARKING - REVERSING THE V-PROCESS
AVL’S BENCHMARK AIMS TO ASSESS HOW WELL THE BATTERY SYSTEM FULFILLS REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO 8 MAIN ATTRIBUTES
Level 0Vehicle
Level 1Vehicle Systems
(i.e. Powertrain)
Level 3Elements Sub-Systems
(i.e. Module, Cooling System)
Level 4HW Parts / SW Systems /
Electronic Hardware
Global Vehicle Benchmark
System & Component Benchmarking
Battery Benchmark Attributes
Performance DriverExperience
Efficiency Safety
EngineeringRequirements
ProductionCapability
Serviceability Cost
BEN
CH
MARK C
RIT
ERIA
& P
ARAM
ETERS
BEN
CH
MARK C
RIT
ERIA
& P
ARAM
ETERS
Level 2Elements
(i.e. Battery)
16
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
17
BATTERY ATTRIBUTES
EACH BATTERY ATTRIBUTE IS EVALUATED VIA AVL METRIC THAT USES DIRECT MAPPING OF EVALUATED PARAMETERS
Number of Parameters
PerformanceDriverExperience
Efficiency SafetyEngineering Requirements
Production Capability
Serviceability Cost General Data
Power: 4Thermal: 6Specific:24Energy: 15Sum: 49
Availability ext. Temp.: 6SOX: 5Power Pulse rep.:2Sum: 13
Gravimetric:8Volumetric:9Electric:2Thermal:11Sum: 30
Electrical:12Thermal:7Mechanical:18Functional:10Homologation:1Sum:48
Mechanical:8Electrical:12Thermal:2Sum:22
Assembly:5Modularity:5Sum: 10
ComponentChange: 8Battery (dis)-mounting: 6Non-exchangeable: 8Diagnostics: 6Sum: 28
Warranty:4Service:4Production:2Further Use:2Sum:12
Power to EnergyP/E: 2Driversupport: 10Sum:12
TOTAL 224 assigned criteria
18
BATTERY ATTRIBUTES DETAIL VIEW
EACH BATTERY ATTRIBUTE IS EVALUATED VIA AVL METRIC THAT USES DIRECT MAPPING OF EVALUATED PARAMETERS
Parameters Weighting
Gravimetric energy density battery (Wh/kg) 0,45
Gravimetric energy density module (Wh/kg) 0,15
Gravimetric energy density cell (Wh/kg) 0,05
Volumetric energy density battery (Wh/l) 0,20
Volumetric energy density module (Wh/l) 0,10
Volumetric energy density cell(Wh/l) 0,05
Sum 1
19
SCATTERBAND - EXPLANATION
THE PARAMETERS ARE TRANSLATED TO RATED CRITERIA. THESE CRITERIA ARE RATED SUB-DIVISIONS OF ONE ATTRIBUTE – WEIGHTING AND RATING DIFFER FOR SPECIFIC SEGMENTS
0,45 Gravimetric energy density battery (Wh/kg)
130
0,15 Gravimetric energy density module (Wh/kg)
170
0,05 Gravimetric energy density cell (Wh/kg)
250
0,20 Volumetric energy density battery (Wh/l)
360
0,10 Volumetric energy density module (Wh/l)
410
0,05 Volumetric energy density cell(Wh/l)
480
SUB-
PARAMETER
Weight, Energy, volume, …
4.3 Rating
4.2 Weighting
0,45 Specific Power 5.2
0,55 Specific Energy 6.3
0,32 Power 7.6
0,15 Thermal 5.2
0,26 Specific 5.8
0,27 Energy 6.46.4
CRITERIASUB-ATTRIBUTE PARAMETERALGORITHM
𝑓 𝑥
20
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
21
RENAULT ZOE BATTERY BENCHMARK VEHICLE
Official Battery DataEnergy total: 25,9 kWh (battery label)Voltage Nominal: 360VCell number: 192Configuration: 96s2pCooling: closed air coolingWeight: 279 kg (incl. side profiles)
Official Vehicle DataPower peak: 65 kWPower continuous: 43 kWTorque: 220 NmSpeed: 135 kphAcceleration: 0-100 kph 13,5 secRange: 210 km (NEDC)Weight: 1468 kg
Source: Official product and website information, Renault, own picture
Best sold BEV in Europe 2015
22
CLOSED AIR COOLING - ASSESSMENTON ROAD MEASUREMENT
Driving
Battery cooling only active during charging
Increasing temperature difference between modules
Test Conditions:
Driving in 3 segments
After each segment charging
Results interpretation:
Air cooling is needed only during charging in 20°C ambient conditions
Temperatures are not equalized during driving
Temperature spread between modules is rising due to a metal crash protection profile halfway through pack
23
COOLING SYSTEM AIRFLOW DESCRIPTION
Air path in the battery: central channel -> gaps between the cell housings -> to outer sides -> back to the outlets.
To cooling air return
duct right
Cooling air
inlet duct
To cooling air
return duct left
Central air
distribution ductDetail: structural aluminum profile in side view
Cooling air
distribution is
disturbed by
structural profile
24
TESLA MODEL S BATTERY BENCHMARK VEHICLE
Official Battery Data
Energy: 85kWh
Voltage Nominal: 355V
Voltage Max: 400V
Cell number: 7104
Configuration: 96s74p
Cooling: Liquid
Weight: 618 kg
Official Vehicle Data
Power: 270 kW
Torque: 440 Nm
Speed: 201 kph
Acceleration: 0-100 kph 5,6 sec
Range: 482 km (NEDC)
Weight: 2108 kg
15, 16
Source: Official product and website information, Tesla
25
PACK TESTING COOLING SYSTEM EVALUATION
Test conditions:
Start temperature +20°C
Symmetric rectangular current profilee.g. ±100/200/250A, 0.05Hz
Coolant flow ratee.g. 3/4/5Lt/min (+20°C)
Result interpretation:
Pack temperature spread up to 9.8K
module temperature spread up to 8.0K
T1 [°C]
T2 [°C]
legend
module
number
Temperature data just after end of test
26
CONTENTS OVERVIEW
1. AVL Introduction
2. Focus Series Battery Benchmarking
3. Benchmarking process
4. Target comparability - Analyzing & rating of the system
5. Battery benchmark example
6. Summary
27
Vehicle to screw analysis Functions and performance on vehicle level is brought into context of design and parts
Building functional understanding AVL developed test program clearly shows function principles and their limits
Orientation in the target system Comparable evaluation via AVLs rating system transparently shows strengths and
weaknesses
Comparable evaluation supports positioning your future products in the market
AVL BENCHMARK ADDS VALUE TO YOUR BENCHMARKING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES:
SUMMARY
www.avl.com
THANK YOU