Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Joint Status Report of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding.
) ) ) ))
A.18-03-009 (Filed March 15, 2018)
JOINT STATUS REPORT
WALKER A. MATTHEWS III ELIZABETH C. BROWN Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-6879 E-mail: [email protected]
Dated: April 30, 2019
1
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Joint Status Report of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding.
)) ) ) )
A.18-03-009 (Filed March 15, 2018)
JOINT STATUS REPORT
Pursuant to the Decision on Phases 2 and 3 of Southern California Edison Company
(U338E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902-E) 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning
Cost Triennial Proceeding and Related Proceeding (Decision (D.) 18-11-034) (dated
December 7, 2018), and Second Ruling of Assigned Administrative Law Judge Modifying Phase
2 Proceeding Schedule (dated February 6, 2019) (Second Ruling), Southern California Edison (U
338-E) (SCE), San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) (SDG&E), the Public Advocates
Office (Cal PA), The Utility Reform Network (TURN), and Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility
(A4NR), respectfully submit this Joint Status Report (Status Report).
I.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Decision (D.) 18-11-034 directed SCE and SDG&E (collectively referred to as the
“Utilities”) to meet with Energy Division Staff and any interested parties to discuss the following
three issues and to report back on the outcome of those discussions in the 2018 Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs Triennial Proceeding (NDCTP):1
1 D.18-11-034, OP 4-6.
2
1. Advice Letter Reporting Requirements – Ordering Paragraph (OP) 4 directed
SCE and SDG&E to meet with Energy Division Staff and any interested parties to
“discuss what if any modification will be needed for the annual Tier 2 Advice
Letter process . . . consistent with the adoption of the Milestone Framework.”2
2. Distributed/Undistributed Cost Categorization – OP 5 directed SCE and
SDG&E to meet with Energy Division Staff and any interested parties to “develop
protocols and guidance for recording staff time designated to Distributed activities
and to define what activities will be considered Undistributed and Distributed
activities.”3
3. Comparison of DCEs for Transparency – OP 6 directed SCE and SDG&E to
meet with Energy Division Staff and any interested parties to “address how SCE
will meet the requirement to provide transparency as to costs authorized in prior
DCEs with those proposed in future DCEs (including application (A.) 18-03-
009.”4
This Status Report constitutes the “joint report” required by D.18-11-034 and the Second
Ruling to report back on the outcome of workshop discussions. Specifically, Decision 18-11-
034, OP 4 provided that a report regarding any modifications to the advice letter reporting
requirement should be submitted no later than April 30, 2019, but Ordering Paragraphs 5-6
provided that the reports on cost-categorization and DCE comparison issues should be submitted
consistent with the schedule adopted for the 2018 NDCTP. The Second Ruling (issued in the
2018 NDCTP) set May 3, 2019 as the due date for a report on the matters addressed in the
workshops, and required the parties to submit a proposed Phase 3 procedural schedule for
testimony and evidentiary hearings on unresolved issues. In the interest of judicial economy,
the parties are submitting one report by the April 30, 2019 deadline to fulfill these requirements.
2 D.18-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 4, p. 79. 3 D.18-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 5, p. 80. 4 D.18-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 6, p. 80.
3
II.
SUMMARY OF WORKSHOPS
The Utilities met and conferred with representatives from Energy Division, the Public
Advocates Office (Cal PA), The Utility Reform Network (TURN), Alliance for Nuclear
Responsibility (A4NR), and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) in a series of three workshops held
January-March, 2019. The content of each workshop presentations5 and resolutions reached are
discussed below.
A. Workshop #1
On January 31, 2019, the following representatives attended the first workshop:
NAME PARTY Walker Matthews SCE Elizabeth Brown SCE Jose Perez SCE Randy Besich SCE Allen Trial SDG&E Wendy Johnson SDG&E Sue Garcia SDG&E Tracy Dalu SDG&E Truman Burns Cal PA John Geesman A4NR Bruce Lacy TURN Laura Krannawitter Energy Division Darcie L. Houck Admin. Law Judge Lindsey How-Downing PG&E Brian Ketelsen PG&E Nathan Wahl PG&E
SCE gave presentations covering each of the three workshop issues – advice letter
reporting requirements, cost categorization, DCE comparisons – including the requirements of
D.18-11-034 and the Utilities’ current practices on each issue. Copies of the three presentations
are included in Attachment A to this Status Report. The Utilities solicited input from workshop
5 This report attaches non-confidential verson of the presentations made during the workshops. Confidential versions were made available to parties who have executed non-disclosure agreements.
4
attendees, and there was active discussion on the three issues. But no final resolution was
reached during the workshop.
B. Workshop #2
On February 28, 2019, the following representatives attended the second workshop:
NAME PARTY Walker Matthews SCE Elizabeth Brown SCE Jose Perez SCE Randy Besich SCE Allen Trial SDG&E Wendy Johnson SDG&E Sue Garcia SDG&E Tracy Dalu SDG&E Truman Burns Cal PA Matthew Freedman TURN Bruce Lacy TURN Laura Krannawitter Energy Division Darcie L. Houck Admin. Law Judge Lindsey How-Downing PG&E Brian Ketelsen PG&E Nathan Wahl PG&E
SCE’s presentation at the second workshop recapped the parties’ discussions in the first
workshop. A copy of the presentation is included in Attachment B to this Status Report. During
the second workshop, the parties agreed on proposed modifications to the advice letter reporting
requirements and DCE comparison issues. The substance of those agreements is discussed in
Section III below.
C. Workshop #3
On March 14, 2019, the following representatives attended the third workshop:
NAME PARTY Walker Matthews SCE Elizabeth Brown SCE Jose Perez SCE Randy Besich SCE Allen Trial SDG&E Wendy Johnson SDG&E
5
NAME PARTY Sue Garcia SDG&E Tracy Dalu SDG&E Truman Burns Cal PA Matthew Freedman TURN Bruce Lacy TURN John Geesman A4NR Laura Krannawitter Energy Division Darcie L. Houck Admin. Law Judge Lindsey How-Downing PG&E Brian Ketelsen PG&E
SCE’s presentation at the third workshop summarized the parties’ discussions on the
Distributed/Undistributed cost-categorization issue from the first two workshops. The
presentation reiterated the Commission’s original direction regarding the objective of the
workshop, and summarized SCE’s proposal to comply with that direction and address issues
raised by TURN regarding the cost categorization issue. A copy of the presentation is included
in Attachment C to this Status Report. The parties did not reach agreement on the cost-
categorization issue during the workshops but are continuing to discuss a potential resolution in
subsequent meetings. If no agreement is reached, the parties will submit their respective
recommendations on the issue in testimony submitted in Phase 3 of this proceeding.
III.
SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS REACHED OR POSITIONS TAKEN
A. Advice Letter Reporting Requirements
The parties agreed to the following modifications to the annual Tier 2 Advice Letter
content reporting requirements:
1. Include “percent expended” on the detailed cost comparison attachment. The
Utilities agreed with Energy Division’s and interested parties’ suggestion that the
Utilities include a to-date “percent expended” for each project line item included
6
in advice letter reports. The number will generally be calculated as the recorded
costs to date divided by the total forecasted costs in the DCE.6
2. Include the Trust Fund balances. The Utilities also agreed with Energy Division’s
and other interested parties’ recommendation that the Utilities include updates
regarding their respective SONGS 2&3 nuclear decommissioning trust (NDTs)
fund balances. The balance reported will be the liquidation value at the most
recently available date.
3. Provide greater discussion of the status of critical path items from the Milestone
Framework. The Utilities also agreed with TURN’s suggestion that the Utilities
provide additional detail regarding the status of critical path items for
decommissioning.
SCE and SDG&E included these modifications in their advice letters, SCE AL 3988-E
and SDG&E AL 3368-E, submitted on April 15, 2019 and April 25, 2019, respectively. The
Utilities will provide a similar level of information in their annual advice letters going forward.
B. DCE Comparison
The parties acknowledged the challenges presented when trying to compare the 2012
DCE to the 2017 DCE and explain variances between them, given various differences between
the DCEs in content and format. Indeed, this challenge was observed in the A.14-12-007 (2014
DCE Proceeding), which involved a comparison of the 2012 and 2014 DCEs. To achieve a
meaningful comparison of the 2012 and 2017 DCE in the 2018 NDCTP, the parties agreed that
SCE must make various assumptions on how to map 2012 DCE activities to 2017 DCE
activities. Based on SCE’s proposal and discussions in the first two workshops, the parties
agreed to the following process for comparing DCEs in the 2018 NDCTP:
6 The recorded costs numerator in SCE’s Spring advice letter will include recorded costs up to the end of the prior year. Because a full year of recorded costs will not be available for the Fall advice letter the recorded costs numerator will include a combination of recorded costs plus forecasted costs.
7
1. SCE will prepare an appendix table that compares the 2012 and 2014 DCEs to the
2017 DCE.
2. The 2017 DCE generally will be compared to the 2014 DCE at the line-item level
as both DCE contain the same format and DCE line item numbering conventions.
3. The comparison of the 2012 DCE to the 2017 DCE, however, will not necessarily
be a line-item to line-item comparison. Instead, the comparison generally will be
provided as a project-to-project comparison, based on SCE’s assessment of how
to map 2012 DCE activities to 2017 DCE activities. (Attachment B, Slide 6 of
the February 28th workshop presentation provides an illustrative example of the
DCE comparison the Utilities will be able to provide.)
4. SCE will also move the Service Level Agreement costs into one line item for
comparison of the DCEs.
C. Distributed/Undistributed Cost Categorization
The parties were unable to reach agreement on the Distributed/Undistributed cost
categorization issue during the workshops. TURN asserts that forecasted and recorded costs
currently classified as undistributed should be subjected to better tracking, benchmarking, review
and reconciliation. In addition, TURN continues to explore options for allocating utility staff,
contracted services, core contractors, DGC staff and other undistributed labor to Distributed
projects.
The Utilities counter that any attempt to allocate additional utility staff costs to
Distributed projects will create false variances that will make any comparison of forecasted costs
to recorded costs substantially more difficult and less efficient.
The parties will continue to discuss a possible resolution. If no agreement is reached, the
parties will submit their recommendations as to how to proceed on this issue in testimony to be
submitted in Phase 3 of this proceeding.
8
Because the results of the parties’ discussions could impact the scope and timing of the
issues to be addressed in Phase 3, the parties respectfully propose that the Commission allow the
parties to submit a supplemental report on the outcome of these discussions and propose a Phase
3 schedule no later than May 30, 2019.
IV.
CONCLUSION
The Commission should adopt the agreements reached by the parties with respect to the
annual Tier 2 advice letter reporting requirements and DCE comparisons.
Date: April 30, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
WALKER A. MATTHEWS III ELIZABETH C. BROWN /s/ Walker A. Matthews By: Walker A. Matthews III7
Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-6879 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Pursuant to Rule 1.8(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I certify that I am authorized by the following parties to sign and tender this document on their behalf: SDG&E, Cal PA, TURN, and A4NR.
Attachment A
Cos
t C
ateg
oriz
atio
n
Janu
ary
31, 2
019
A-1
2
Out
line
•P
urpo
se o
f the
Wor
ksho
p
•W
hat a
re U
ndis
tribu
ted
Cos
ts?
•In
dust
ry P
ract
ice
•M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k A
gree
men
t•
SC
E’s
Cha
rgin
g P
ract
ice
for U
tility
Sta
ff
•C
ost C
ateg
oriz
atio
n
•C
oncl
usio
n
A-2
3
Purp
ose
of W
orks
hop
•20
15 N
DC
TP D
ecis
ion
18-1
1-03
4 st
ated
…[U
tiliti
es]
shal
l mee
t with
Ene
rgy
Divi
sion
sta
ff an
d in
tere
sted
pa
rties
to
deve
lop
prot
ocol
s an
d gu
idan
ce fo
r re
cord
ing
staf
f tim
e de
sign
ated
to D
istri
bute
d ac
tiviti
es,
and
to d
efin
e w
hat a
ctivi
ties
will
be
cons
ider
ed U
ndis
tribu
ted
and
Dis
tribu
ted
activ
ities
.
•W
orks
hops
hel
d to
dev
elop
the
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
prov
ided
muc
h ba
ckgr
ound
on
this
to
pic
A-3
4
Wha
t are
Und
istr
ibut
ed
Cos
ts?
•Ty
pica
lly ti
me-
depe
nden
t cos
ts in
curr
ed th
roug
hout
the
dura
tion
of th
e pr
ojec
t (e
.g.,
Util
ity L
abor
and
Sec
urity
For
ce)
•R
ecur
ring
and
unav
oida
ble
expe
nses
, sim
ilar t
o th
ose
incu
rred
dur
ing
plan
t op
erat
ion,
to c
ompl
y w
ith re
gula
tory
and
con
tract
ual r
equi
rem
ents
•
Una
ssig
nabl
e to
spe
cific
dis
tribu
ted
activ
ities
(i.e
., th
e ph
ysic
al w
ork
to
deco
mm
issi
on th
e pl
ant)
•In
clud
es c
osts
requ
ired
to m
aint
ain
the
plan
t whe
ther
act
ive d
ecom
mis
sion
ing
is
ongo
ing
or n
ot
–Pl
ant s
ecur
ity a
nd o
pera
tions
sta
ffing
–Le
ase
and
ease
men
t pa
ymen
ts–
NRC
fee
s–
Insu
ranc
e–
Envir
onm
enta
l Fe
es a
nd P
erm
its–
Seve
ranc
e
A-4
5
Indu
stry
Pra
ctic
e
•Pr
evio
us S
ON
GS
2&3
DC
Es, w
hich
wer
e pr
epar
ed b
y AB
Z, d
id
not i
nclu
de U
tility
St
affin
g in
the
dire
ct
activ
ity c
osts
.
Dis
tribu
ted
Cos
ts
Undi
strib
uted
C
osts
AB
Z SO
NGS
2012
DC
E :
A-5
6
Indu
stry
Pra
ctic
e•
Trea
tmen
t of
keep
ing
Util
ity
Sta
ffing
cos
ts
sepa
rate
from
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
activ
ity c
osts
(i.e
., no
t inc
lude
d in
the
phys
ical
wor
k to
de
com
mis
sion
pl
ant)
is c
onsi
sten
t w
ith D
iabl
o C
anyo
n an
d P
alo
Verd
e’s
DC
Es,
whi
ch w
ere
prep
ared
by
TLG
S
ervic
es.
2016
Dia
blo
Can
yon
DC
E:20
16 P
alo
Verd
e D
CE:
2016
Dia
blo
Can
yon
DC
E:
6
2016
Pal
o Ve
rde
DC
E:
A-6
7
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
Agre
emen
t•
Fram
ewor
k w
as n
egot
iate
d be
twee
n th
e U
tiliti
es a
nd th
e in
tere
sted
pa
rties
dur
ing
a se
ries
of w
orks
hops
and
mee
tings
•R
ecog
nize
d th
at d
istri
bute
d an
d un
dist
ribut
ed a
ctiv
ities
are
diff
eren
t–
Dis
cuss
ed m
any
diffe
rent
opt
ions
for t
reat
men
t of u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s in
clud
ing
allo
catio
ns to
dis
tribu
ted
proj
ects
–Ag
reem
ent s
ettle
d on
usi
ng a
“che
ck p
oint
” app
roac
h to
mak
e su
re u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s (in
clud
ing
Utili
ty a
nd D
GC
Sta
ffing
) wer
e tie
d to
pro
ject
per
form
ance
–
Purp
ose
of a
gree
ing
to c
heck
poin
ts w
as to
avo
id u
nnec
essa
ry a
lloca
tions
•“U
ndis
trib
uted
Act
ivity
cos
ts a
re n
ot d
irec
tly re
late
d or
cha
rgea
ble
to a
par
ticul
ar D
istr
ibut
ed A
ctiv
ity, b
ut m
ay b
e in
fluen
ced
by th
e tim
ing
of ‘c
heck
poin
ts.’”
(1)
•U
tility
Sta
ffing
cos
ts w
ere
cons
ider
ed u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s in
the
Fram
ewor
kNo
te:
(1) C
omm
issi
on-a
ppro
ved
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
A-7
8
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
Agre
emen
t•
Atta
chm
ent A
incl
uded
in th
e Fr
amew
ork
pres
ents
the
estim
ated
cos
ts b
y N
DC
TP
•U
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s w
ere
estim
ated
usi
ng th
e 20
14 D
CE
A-8
9
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
Agre
emen
t•
For e
xam
ple,
$27
0M in
est
imat
ed U
ndis
tribu
ted
Cos
ts th
at w
ere
sche
dule
d to
be
revie
wed
in
the
2018
ND
CTP
incl
ude
Utilit
y St
aff a
nd D
GC
Sta
ff co
sts
A-9
10
Util
ity S
taff
•U
ndis
tribu
ted
Util
ity
Staf
fing
cost
s ar
e m
ade
up o
f m
ultip
le
divi
sion
s
Note
:(1
) Tab
le 1
0 is
from
the
SO
NG
S 2
&3
2017
DC
E
A-1
0
11
Cos
t Est
imat
ing
and
Rec
ordi
ng P
ract
ices
Pers
onne
l Stru
ctur
e
ISFS
IAg
ing
Mng
t.
Mes
a
Pro
ject
Sta
ff(D
istri
bute
d)U
ndis
tribu
ted
Util
ity S
taff
Sec
urity
Ove
rsig
ht
A-1
1
12
Util
ity S
taff
•
TUR
N’s
reco
mm
enda
tion
in th
e 20
15 N
DC
TP r
ecog
nize
d th
at s
ome
SON
GS
divi
sion
s, w
ithin
the
Util
ity S
taff
cate
gory
, do
not
dire
ctly
sup
port
dist
ribut
ed w
ork
–TU
RN
’s 2
018
ND
CTP
test
imon
y re
affir
ms
this
pos
ition
•TU
RN
exc
lude
d th
ese
divi
sion
s fro
m th
eir r
ecom
men
datio
n–
VP/S
ite M
anag
emen
t –
Nuc
lear
Reg
ulat
ory
Ove
rsig
ht–
Sec
urity
•TU
RN
sug
gest
ed a
lloca
ting
50%
of t
he re
mai
ning
cos
ts to
m
ajor
pro
ject
s
A-1
2
13
Util
ity S
taff
•S
CE
’s p
ositio
n is
that
rem
aini
ng o
rgan
izat
ions
do
not d
irect
ly s
uppo
rt a
spec
ific m
ajor
pro
ject
(e.g
.)–
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g Fi
nanc
e
–Pl
ant M
anag
emen
t
•S
CE
doe
s no
t bel
ieve
tha
t 50%
of u
ndis
tribu
ted
staf
f cos
ts a
re c
lear
ly a
ttrib
utab
le t
o a
spec
ific
maj
or p
roje
ct•
Utili
ty S
taff
is p
erfo
rmin
g ov
ersi
ght
A-1
3
14
Hyp
othe
tical
Exa
mpl
e•
Ass
ume
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g O
vers
ight
st
affin
g sh
ould
be
allo
cate
d to
maj
or
proj
ects
(i.e
., TU
RN
’s p
ositi
on)
•Fo
r exa
mpl
e, in
201
7 D
CE
Per
iod
4 (D
&D
/Dry
Sto
rage
):–
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g O
vers
ight
Sta
ffing
of $
128M
(a
ppro
x. $
13M
per
yea
r)
–To
tal d
istri
bute
d w
ork
durin
g th
e pe
riod
was
$1
,189
M
–TU
RN
assu
mes
50%
of s
elec
ted
Utilit
y S
taff
cost
s ca
n be
attr
ibut
able
to m
ajor
pro
ject
s
–Th
is w
ould
onl
y im
pact
the
maj
or p
roje
ct c
osts
by,
at
mos
t, ~5
% ([
$128
M*
50%
] / $
1,18
9M)
A-1
4
15
SCE’
s C
harg
ing
Prac
tice
For U
tility
Sta
ff•
SC
E h
as re
spon
ded
to n
umer
ous
itera
tions
of t
his
data
requ
est o
ver
the
last
two
ND
CTP
s (1
6-03
-004
and
18-0
3-00
9)
•S
CE
’s c
harg
ing
prac
tice
–“C
harg
e W
here
You
Wor
k”
–C
onsi
sten
t with
the
way
DC
Es fo
reca
st c
osts
, inc
ludi
ng
the
2012
, 201
4 an
d 20
17 D
CEs
A-1
5
16
SCE’
s C
harg
ing
Prac
tice
For U
tility
Sta
ff
1
No
Yes
Yes
No
A-1
6
17
Cos
t Cat
egor
izat
ion
•D
.18-
11-0
34 c
onta
ins
spec
ific
requ
irem
ents
:–
“The
revi
sed
cost
cat
egor
izat
ion
stru
ctur
e m
ust s
et fo
rth h
ow c
osts
will
be re
cord
ed in
the
futu
re,
in a
man
ner t
hat c
an e
ffici
ently
com
pare
to fo
reca
sted
cos
ts in
clud
ed in
the
DC
E.”
[Em
phas
is a
dded
]
•E
stab
lishm
ent o
f an
allo
catio
n sc
hem
e w
ould
cre
ate
chal
leng
es–
Fore
cast
ing
wou
ld b
e a
chal
leng
e •
Mor
e de
taile
d re
quire
d th
an ju
st i
dent
ifyin
g “D
GC
Sco
pe” s
uppo
rted
•R
equi
red
to e
stim
ate
cost
s ac
ross
mul
tiple
maj
or p
roje
cts
(e.g
., R
VI s
egm
enta
tion
vs. S
team
Gen
erat
or
Rem
oval
vs.
Lar
ge C
ompo
nent
Rem
oval
etc
.)
•E
stim
ate
this
leve
l of d
etai
l for
the
dura
tion
of th
e D
GC
Sco
pe (e
.g.,
2028
)
–W
ill cr
eate
mis
lead
ing
varia
nces
sol
ely
base
d on
fore
cast
ing
allo
catio
n pe
rcen
tage
s
•W
ill cr
eate
mea
ning
less
var
ianc
es b
etw
een
fore
cast
ed a
nd re
cord
ed c
osts
•W
ill cr
eate
var
ianc
es e
ven
if th
e U
tility
sta
ffing
is th
e sa
me
–W
ould
not
be
an e
ffici
ent p
roce
ss
A-1
7
18
Idea
s to
Con
side
r
•A
lloca
tions
do
not s
uppo
rt th
e di
rect
ive
to
“effi
cien
tly c
ompa
re” e
stim
ated
cos
ts to
reco
rded
co
sts
•Th
e U
tility
Sta
ff is
in a
n ov
ersi
ght
role
and
doe
s no
t di
rect
ly su
ppor
t spe
cific
maj
or p
roje
cts
•S
CE
’s b
enef
it in
the
“give
/take
” of
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
nego
tiatio
ns is
that
all
Utili
ty S
taff
cost
s ar
e re
view
ed w
ith U
ndis
tribu
ted
Cos
ts
A-1
8
Annu
al A
dvic
e Le
tter P
roce
ss
Janu
ary
31, 2
019
A-1
9
2
Out
line
•P
urpo
se o
f Wor
ksho
p
•G
ener
al In
form
atio
n
•A
dvic
e Le
tter A
ttach
men
ts A-2
0
3
Purp
ose
of W
orks
hop
•20
15 N
DC
TP D
ecis
ion
requ
ires
SC
E to
mee
t with
E
nerg
y D
ivisi
on a
nd in
tere
sted
par
ties
to d
iscu
ss
wha
t, if
any,
mod
ificat
ions
will
be n
eede
d fo
r the
an
nual
Tie
r 2
Adv
ice
Lette
r pr
oces
s…co
nsis
tent
w
ith th
e ad
optio
n of
the
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork.
•…
each
suc
h A
L m
ust s
how
….re
late
d pr
ogre
ss
tow
ard
spec
ific m
ajor
mile
ston
es in
the
deco
mm
issi
onin
g pr
oces
s co
nsis
tent
with
the
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork…
. A-2
1
4
Advi
ce L
ette
r Gen
eral
In
form
atio
n•
SC
E F
iles
Two
Tier
2 A
dvic
e Le
tters
Eac
h Ye
ar–
Fall A
dvic
e Le
tter
•P
rovi
des
curr
ent s
tatu
s of
dec
omm
issi
onin
g
•R
eque
sts
auth
oriza
tion
for d
isbu
rsem
ents
fro
m th
e nu
clea
r de
com
mis
sion
ing
trust
s fo
r ide
ntifi
ed y
ear’s
cas
h flo
w
•R
epor
ts re
ques
ted
amou
nts
(i.e.
, for
ecas
t) ag
ains
t DC
E b
y D
CE
line
item
•P
rovi
des
varia
nce
anal
ysis
bet
wee
n D
CE
and
fore
cast
(bot
h co
st a
nd s
ched
ule)
–S
prin
g Ad
vice
Let
ter
•P
rovi
des
curr
ent s
tatu
s of
dec
omm
issi
onin
g
•R
epor
ts re
cord
ed c
osts
aga
inst
requ
este
d am
ount
s fro
m a
ssoc
iate
d Fa
ll Adv
ice
Lette
r
•P
rovi
des
high
-leve
l var
ianc
e an
alys
is b
etw
een
reco
rded
cos
ts a
nd p
revi
ousl
y re
ques
ted
amou
nts
A-2
2
5
Advi
ce L
ette
r Gen
eral
In
form
atio
n•
Adv
ice
Lette
rs r
epor
t cos
ts c
onsi
sten
t with
the
maj
or p
roje
cts
incl
uded
in th
e M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k–
SCE
upda
ted
the
Advi
ce L
ette
r stru
ctur
e in
Fal
l 201
8 AL
(i.
e., 2
019
Budg
et)
to re
flect
the
rece
ntly
app
rove
d fra
mew
ork
–SC
E al
so c
ompl
ied
with
Com
mis
sion
’s d
irect
ion
to
incl
ude
a st
atus
of t
he IS
FSI a
nd In
itial
D&D
Maj
or
Proj
ects
A-2
3
6
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•SC
E pr
evio
usly
wor
ked
with
Ene
rgy
Div
isio
n to
ens
ure
the
Advi
ce L
ette
rs p
rovi
de in
form
atio
n th
at is
nee
ded
by o
r of i
nter
est t
o th
e C
omm
issi
on a
nd o
ther
s•
Prov
ide
com
preh
ensi
ve s
tatu
s up
date
s of
the
deco
mm
issi
onin
g pr
ojec
t cos
t and
sch
edul
e pe
rform
ance
•Fa
ll Ad
vice
Let
ter
Cur
rent
ly C
onta
ins:
–
11 A
ttach
men
ts
–R
evis
ed s
truct
ure
and
atta
chm
ents
in re
spon
se to
upd
ated
re
quire
men
ts
A-2
4
7
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•At
tach
men
t 1: G
raph
Tra
ckin
g To
tal D
CE
Estim
ate,
Act
ual,
and
Fore
cast
ed D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Expe
nditu
res
A-2
5
8
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•A
ttach
men
t 2: D
escr
iptio
n of
Wor
k Act
iviti
es a
nd P
relim
inar
y Va
rianc
e E
xpla
natio
ns fo
r For
ecas
ted
Exp
ense
s w
ith R
efer
ence
to D
CE
•A
ttach
men
t 3: C
ompa
rison
of D
CE
and
For
ecas
ted
Exp
endi
ture
s by
C
ost C
ateg
ory
and
DC
E L
ine
Num
ber
[A]
[B]
[C=A
-B]
[D]
[E]
[F]
[G]
DC
E N
o.M
ajor
Pro
ject
(1)
Des
crip
tion
(2)
2017
DC
E (3
)Fo
reca
sted
Var
ianc
e
Fore
cast
edIn
cept
ion
To
Dat
e Th
roug
h 20
19(4
)To
tal 2
017
DC
E (3) (
5)C
urre
nt
Star
t C
urre
nt
Fini
sh11
9SN
F-2-
D-C
DP
ISFS
I CD
P Se
ttlem
ent
ISFS
I CD
P Se
ttlem
ent
1.2
1.7
(0.5
)5.
14.
3
8/30
/201
78/
30/2
021
120
ISFS
I Coa
stal
Dev
elop
men
t Per
mit
Sett
lem
ent S
ubto
tal
1.2
$
1.
7$
(0.5
)$
5.1
$
4.3
$
12
112
2SN
F-2-
D-A
M A
reva
ISFS
I Agi
ng M
anag
emen
tA
reva
ISFS
I Rel
icen
sing
3.8
2.8
1.0
5.9
14.1
9/
1/20
1612
/31/
2022
123
SNF-
2-D
-AM
Hol
tec1
ISFS
I Agi
ng M
anag
emen
tH
olte
c IS
FSI I
&M
Pro
gram
Dev
elop
men
t3.
84.
8(1
.0)
7.2
16.7
2/
15/2
017
10/6
/202
012
4IS
FSI A
ging
Man
agem
ent S
ubto
tal
7.6
$
7.
6$
0.0
$
13.2
$
30.8
$
2019
Atta
chm
ent 3
:
A-2
6
9
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•A
ttach
men
t 4: C
ompa
rison
of D
CE
Est
imat
ed a
nd F
orec
aste
d C
ash
Flow
•A
ttach
men
t 5: I
llust
ratio
n of
Hig
h-Le
vel C
urre
nt D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Sch
edul
e
A-2
7
10
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•At
tach
men
t 6: A
djus
ted
Tota
l Am
ount
s R
eque
sted
to
Dat
e,
Incl
udin
g Pr
evio
us A
dvic
e Le
tters
–S
umm
ariz
es R
eque
sted
Am
ount
s To
Dat
e In
:•
2014
$, 1
00%
Sha
re
•N
omin
al $
, 100
% S
hare
•N
omin
al, S
CE
Sha
re
A-2
8
11
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•At
tach
men
t 7: F
orec
aste
d Es
cala
tion
and
De-
Esca
latio
n Fa
ctor
s –
Use
d to
de-
esca
late
fore
cast
ed/ r
ecor
ded
cost
s to
201
4$ fo
r pu
rpos
es o
f com
paris
on to
DC
E
•At
tach
men
t 8: F
inal
Esc
alat
ion
Fact
or A
djus
tmen
t–
Upd
ates
reco
rded
cos
ts in
sta
ted
in 2
014$
in p
rior A
dvic
e Le
tters
to
acco
unt f
or fi
nal e
scal
atio
n fa
ctor
s
A-2
9
12
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•At
tach
men
t 9: S
CE
Trus
t Fun
d D
isbu
rsem
ent A
mou
nts
–S
umm
ariz
es re
ques
ted,
app
rove
d, a
nd w
ithdr
awn
amou
nts
at ti
me
the
AL
is fi
led
•A
ttach
men
t 10:
201
7 D
CE
Was
te D
ispo
sal A
djus
tmen
t –
Upd
ated
201
7 D
CE
to a
lign
to p
ropo
sed
mile
ston
e fra
mew
ork
for D
&D
w
aste
dis
posa
l cos
ts
A-3
0
13
Advi
ce L
ette
r Atta
chm
ents
•At
tach
men
t 11:
Sta
tus
Rep
ort f
or IS
FSI a
nd In
itial
D&D
Ac
tiviti
es–
SC
E a
dded
this
atta
chm
ent p
er re
quire
men
t of D
ecis
ion
18-1
1-03
4
A-3
1
14
Wor
k w
ith E
nerg
y D
ivis
ion
•P
revio
usly
wor
ked
with
Ene
rgy
Divi
sion
to
mak
e su
re n
eeds
wer
e be
ing
met
•D
urin
g w
orks
hops
for t
he p
rior N
DC
TP, w
e co
nfirm
ed E
nerg
y D
ivisi
on’s
nee
ds w
ere
bein
g m
et
A-3
2
A-3
3
2
Out
line
•P
urpo
se o
f Wor
ksho
p•
DC
E C
ompa
rison
s •
Com
paris
on o
f 201
7 D
CE
to 2
014
DC
E P
rovid
ed•
Cha
lleng
es t
o P
erfo
rm C
ompa
rison
to 2
012
DC
E•
Pro
pose
d A
ppro
ach
to C
ompa
re D
CE
s•
Pro
pose
d C
ompa
rison
Tab
le•
Con
clus
ion
A-3
4
3
Purp
ose
of W
orks
hop
•20
15 N
DC
TP D
ecis
ion
18-1
1-03
4 st
ated
.…m
eet
with
Ene
rgy
Divi
sion
sta
ff to
add
ress
how
SC
E w
ill m
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts t
o pr
ovid
e tra
nspa
renc
y as
to
cos
ts a
utho
rized
in p
rior D
CE
S w
ith th
ose
prop
osed
in fu
ture
DC
Es
(incl
udin
g (A
.)18-
03-0
09)
A-3
5
4
DC
E To
DC
E C
ompa
rison
•D
.18-
11-0
34 re
quire
s th
at S
CE
com
pare
the
2017
DC
E to
th
e tw
o pr
ior D
CEs
(201
4 an
d 20
12)
–“W
e th
eref
ore
requ
ire S
CE
to p
rovi
de a
com
paris
on o
f any
new
DC
E
with
the
two-
prio
r app
rove
d D
CE
s co
nsis
tent
with
D.1
7-05
-020
.” (D
ecis
ion,
pg.
63)
•Th
e C
omm
issi
on re
cogn
ized
tha
t cha
lleng
es e
xist i
n th
is
com
paris
on–
“The
com
paris
on o
f the
201
8 D
CE
with
the
last
two-
prio
r app
rove
d D
CE
s po
ses
som
e di
fficu
lties
giv
en th
e ch
ange
in fo
rmat
for
reco
rdin
g co
sts,
prio
r erro
rs/o
mis
sion
s ac
know
ledg
ed b
y S
CE
, and
th
e ne
ed fo
r mor
e cl
arity
as
to w
hat i
tem
s m
ay b
e ca
tego
rized
as
Und
istri
bute
d an
d D
istri
bute
d ac
tiviti
es.”
(Dec
isio
n, p
g. 6
0)
A-3
6
5
Com
paris
on O
f 201
7 D
CE
To 2
014
DC
E Pr
ovid
ed•
SCE
incl
uded
a d
etai
led
com
paris
on b
etw
een
the
2017
DC
E an
d 20
14 D
CE
whi
ch w
as in
clud
ed in
the
2018
ND
CTP
test
imon
y(1)
•Th
e 20
14 a
nd 2
017
DC
Es u
tiliz
e th
e sa
me
Wor
k Br
eakd
own
Stru
ctur
e (W
BS)
–Th
e sa
me
stru
ctur
e al
low
s fo
r a “c
ross
-wal
k” b
etw
een
DC
Es
and
faci
litat
es c
ompa
rison
–C
ompa
rison
was
per
form
ed a
t the
maj
or p
roje
ct le
vel a
nd fo
r un
dist
ribut
ed a
ctiv
ities
Not
es:
(1) S
ee S
CE
-03C
Tabl
e IV
-2, R
econ
cilia
tion
of 2
017
DC
E to
201
4 D
CE
A-3
7
A-3
8
7
Cha
lleng
es T
o Pe
rfor
m
Com
paris
on T
o 20
12 D
CE
•A
one-
to-o
ne m
appi
ng o
f the
WB
S in
clud
ed in
th
e 20
12 a
nd 2
014/
2017
DC
Es
does
not
exis
t•
Ass
umpt
ions
abo
ut w
here
201
2 D
CE
act
iviti
es
map
to th
e 20
14/2
017
DC
E s
truct
ure
will
be
requ
ired
•D
ue to
all
the
assu
mpt
ions
, a
mea
ning
ful “
line
item
act
ivity
leve
l” co
mpa
rison
is n
ot p
ract
ical
A-3
9
A-4
0
9
Cha
lleng
es T
o Pe
rfor
m
Com
paris
on T
o 20
12 D
CE
•In
the
2014
DC
E, l
ead
and
asbe
stos
aba
tem
ent
is b
roke
n in
to e
ssen
tial a
nd n
on-e
ssen
tial
syst
ems,
so
each
bu
ildin
g in
the
2012
DC
E w
ould
nee
d to
be
cate
goriz
ed
into
ess
entia
l vs.
non
-ess
entia
l in
orde
r to
map
to th
e 20
14 D
CE
WB
S
•In
the
2017
DC
E, t
hese
cos
ts a
re n
ot b
roke
n ou
t se
para
tely
due
to th
e st
ruct
ure
of th
e fix
ed p
rice
cont
ract
A-4
1
A-4
2
11
Prop
osed
App
roac
h To
C
ompa
re D
CEs
•A
ssum
ptio
ns w
ill n
eed
to b
e m
ade
for
activ
ities
incl
uded
in th
e 20
12 D
CE
•S
CE
will
pre
pare
and
sub
mit
an a
ppen
dix
to
prov
ide
a co
mpa
rison
tabl
e of
the
DC
Es
–S
CE
doe
s no
t int
end
to p
erfo
rm a
var
ianc
e an
alys
is b
etw
een
the
2017
DC
E to
the
2012
D
CE
–H
igh-
leve
l com
paris
on in
201
4$
A-4
3
A-4
4
13
Prop
osed
App
roac
h To
C
ompa
re D
CEs
•C
ompa
rison
of u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s–
Labo
r-Sta
ffing
–N
on-L
abor
–D
GC
Sta
ffing
A-4
5
A-4
6
15
Idea
s to
Con
side
r•
SCE
will
pre
pare
and
sub
mit
an a
ppen
dix
to p
rovi
de a
co
mpa
rison
tabl
e of
the
DC
Es–
SC
E d
oes
not i
nten
d to
per
form
a v
aria
nce
anal
ysis
bet
wee
n th
e 20
17 D
CE
to th
e 20
12 D
CE
–H
igh-
leve
l com
paris
on in
201
4$•
A m
ore
deta
iled
com
paris
on m
ay n
ot b
e po
ssib
le–
If po
ssib
le, w
ould
tak
e si
gnifi
cant
ly m
ore
time,
reso
urce
s, a
nd m
ay n
ot p
rovi
de
any
addi
tiona
l val
ue–
Wou
ld lik
ely
need
to re
-eng
age
ABZ
and
pote
ntia
lly E
nerg
ySol
utio
ns to
sup
port
a de
taile
d co
mpa
rison
•G
oing
forw
ard
and
with
dec
omm
issi
onin
g st
arte
d, S
CE
pla
ns to
kee
p th
e D
CE
line
item
stru
ctur
e (i.
e., W
BS
stru
ctur
e) th
e sa
me,
and
th
eref
ore
thes
e sp
ecifi
c ch
alle
nges
are
likel
y m
itiga
ted
in fu
ture
co
mpa
rison
s
A-4
7
Attachment B
2
Intr
oduc
tion
•N
o co
mm
ents
rece
ived
to-d
ate
•W
ill re
cap
wha
t was
dis
cuss
ed d
urin
g w
orks
hop
#1
and
revi
ew S
CE
’s p
ropo
sal o
n ea
ch to
pic
•G
oal o
f thi
s w
orks
hop
is to
reac
h ag
reem
ent o
n th
ese
issu
es
3
Rec
ap o
f Wor
ksho
p #1
A
dvic
eLe
tters
•P
rovi
ded
an o
verv
iew
of t
he S
prin
g an
d Fa
ll A
dvic
e Le
tters
and
dis
cuss
ed th
eir p
urpo
se•
Wal
ked
thro
ugh
each
atta
chm
ent i
nclu
ded
in th
e A
dvic
e Le
tters
to d
escr
ibe
thei
r pur
pose
•
Con
firm
ed th
at S
CE
had
upd
ated
the
Adv
ice
Lette
rs to
inco
rpor
ate
the
Com
mis
sion
’s d
irect
ion
rega
rdin
g th
e M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k an
d th
e st
atus
of
maj
or p
roje
cts
4
SCE’
s Pr
opos
alA
dvic
eLe
tters
•B
ased
on
wor
ksho
p co
mm
ents
from
the
Ene
rgy
Div
isio
n, S
CE
agr
ees
to in
clud
e:–
“Per
cent
Exp
ende
d” o
n th
e de
taile
d co
st c
ompa
rison
at
tach
men
t–
Trus
t Fun
d B
alan
ces
•C
ontin
ue to
incl
ude
the
“Sta
tus
Rep
ort”
atta
chm
ent
as d
irect
ed b
y th
e C
omm
issi
on
5
Rec
ap o
f Wor
ksho
p #
1D
CE
Com
paris
ons
•S
CE
disc
usse
d ch
alle
nges
to p
erfo
rm a
com
paris
on
betw
een
the
SO
NG
S 2
017
DC
E a
nd th
e 20
12 D
CE
•S
CE
will
nee
d to
mak
e as
sum
ptio
ns o
n w
here
to m
ap
2012
DC
E a
ctiv
ities
to th
e 20
17 D
CE
cat
egor
ies
•D
evel
opin
g a
com
paris
on w
ill h
ave
chal
leng
es, w
hich
w
ere
reco
gniz
ed b
y th
e C
omm
issi
on–
The
2012
DC
E is
bas
ed o
n a
diffe
rent
DC
E li
ne n
umbe
r st
ruct
ure
than
the
2014
/201
7 D
CE
s, w
hich
will
mak
e a
“line
by
line
activ
ity le
vel”
com
paris
on n
ot p
ract
ical
7
SCE’
s Pr
opos
alD
CE
Com
paris
ons
•S
CE
will
prep
are
and
subm
it an
app
endi
x to
pr
ovid
e a
com
paris
on ta
ble
of th
e D
CE
s–
Hig
h-le
vel c
ompa
rison
in 2
014$
•W
illno
te a
ny m
ajor
issu
es c
reat
ing
varia
nces
–B
ased
on
com
men
ts d
urin
g th
e w
orks
hop,
SC
E
agre
ed to
mov
e th
e S
ervi
ce L
evel
Agr
eem
ent
(form
erly
A&
G) c
osts
into
one
line
item
, sim
ilar t
o pr
evio
us d
ata
requ
ests
•G
oing
forw
ard,
SC
E p
lans
to k
eep
the
DC
E li
ne it
em
stru
ctur
e th
e sa
me,
and
ther
efor
e m
itiga
ting
futu
re
com
paris
ons
com
plic
atio
ns
8
Rec
ap o
f Wor
ksho
p #1
Cos
tCat
egor
izat
ion
•D
iscu
ssed
the
defin
ition
of u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s
•P
rovi
ded
exam
ples
of t
he in
dust
ry’s
pra
ctic
e of
sep
arat
ing
undi
strib
uted
cos
ts, i
nclu
ding
Util
ity a
nd D
GC
sta
ffing
, fro
m
dist
ribut
ed a
ctiv
ities
•P
rovi
ded
an o
verv
iew
of S
CE
’s c
harg
ing
prac
tices
•R
each
ed a
gree
men
t tha
t allo
catio
ns o
f util
ity s
taff
cost
s w
ill cr
eate
“fa
lse
varia
nces
” whe
n co
mpa
ring
reco
rded
and
est
imat
ed c
osts
•S
CE
out
lined
its
posi
tion
on w
hy th
e ag
reed
upo
n M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k al
read
y ac
hiev
es “l
inki
ng” u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s to
pro
ject
pe
rform
ance
9
SCE’
s Pr
opos
alC
ostC
ompa
rison
•C
ontin
ue to
follo
w th
e ag
reed
upo
n M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k fo
r tim
ing
and
scop
e of
und
istri
bute
d co
st
revi
ews
•M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k ac
hiev
es th
e C
omm
issi
on’s
de
sire
s–
“The
revi
sed
cost
cat
egor
izat
ion
stru
ctur
e m
ust s
et fo
rth h
ow c
osts
will
be
reco
rded
in th
e fu
ture
, in
a m
anne
r tha
t can
effi
cien
tly c
ompa
re to
fo
reca
sted
cos
ts in
clud
ed in
the
DC
E.” [
Em
phas
is a
dded
]
Attachment C
Cos
tC
ateg
oriz
atio
n
Mar
ch 1
4, 2
019
2
Out
line
•P
urpo
se o
f the
Wor
ksho
p
•S
CE
’s C
urre
nt G
uida
nce
•R
easo
nabl
enes
s R
evie
w C
riter
ia
•S
CE
’s P
ropo
sal F
rom
Las
t Wor
ksho
p
3
Purp
ose
of W
orks
hop
•20
15 N
DC
TP D
ecis
ion
18-1
1-03
4 st
ated
…[U
tiliti
es] s
hall
mee
t w
ith E
nerg
y D
ivis
ion
staf
f and
inte
rest
ed p
artie
s to
dev
elop
pr
otoc
ols
and
guid
ance
for r
ecor
ding
sta
ff tim
e de
sign
ated
to
Dis
tribu
ted
activ
ities
, and
to d
efin
e w
hat a
ctiv
ities
will
be
cons
ider
ed U
ndis
tribu
ted
and
Dis
tribu
ted
activ
ities
.•
Com
mis
sion
s’ g
oals
–“T
he re
vise
d co
st c
ateg
oriz
atio
n st
ruct
ure
mus
t set
forth
how
cos
ts w
ill
be re
cord
ed in
the
futu
re, i
n a
man
ner t
hat c
an e
ffici
ently
com
pare
to
fore
cast
ed c
osts
incl
uded
in th
e D
CE.
” [E
mph
asis
add
ed]
–“[A
]ddr
ess
how
SC
E w
ill in
the
futu
re p
rovi
de m
ore
deta
iled
dire
ctio
ns
and
inst
ruct
ions
to it
s st
aff s
o th
at re
cord
kee
ping
will
dire
ctly
and
tran
spar
ently
be
refle
cted
in th
e ap
prop
riate
loca
tion,
and
with
the
appr
opria
te d
etai
l.” [E
mph
asis
add
ed]
4
SCE’
s C
harg
ing
Prac
tice
For U
tility
Sta
ff
No
Yes
•S
CE
’s g
uida
nce
stat
es th
at
pers
onne
l sho
uld
char
ge th
eir t
ime
to w
here
they
wor
k. I
f you
wor
k on
a
proj
ect t
he c
harg
es s
houl
d be
re
cord
ed to
that
pro
ject
.
•S
ON
GS
reco
rded
cos
ts c
urre
ntly
al
ign
to th
e D
CE
and
inco
rpor
ate
indu
stry
pra
ctic
es fo
r est
imat
ing
undi
strib
uted
cos
ts, i
nclu
ding
ca
tego
rizin
g U
tility
Sta
ff co
sts
as
undi
strib
uted
.
•S
CE
pro
vide
s di
scus
sion
on
all
undi
strib
uted
cos
ts a
s pa
rt of
the
ND
CTP
test
imon
y.
5
Rea
sona
blen
ess
Stan
dard
•
“[W]e
def
ine
reas
onab
lene
ss fo
r dec
omm
issi
onin
g ex
pend
iture
s co
nsis
tent
with
prio
r Com
mis
sion
fin
ding
s; i.
e., t
hat t
he re
ason
able
ness
of a
par
ticul
ar
man
agem
ent a
ctio
n de
pend
s on
wha
t the
util
ity k
new
or
sho
uld
have
kno
wn
at th
e tim
e th
e m
anag
eria
l de
cisi
on w
as m
ade.
”1
•S
CE
has
dem
onst
rate
d its
will
ingn
ess
to e
xten
d be
yond
the
reas
onab
lene
ss s
tand
ard
to re
ach
agre
emen
t with
inte
rest
ed p
artie
s.
–S
CE
has
agr
eed
to th
e M
ilest
one
Fram
ewor
k, w
hich
sub
ject
s re
view
to “c
heck
poin
ts” v
s. re
view
s co
sts
ever
y th
ree
year
s
Sou
rce:
(1) S
ee D
.10-
07-0
47, p
. 10;
D.1
6-12
-063
, pp.
9-1
0; a
ccor
d D
.02-
08-0
64, p
p. 5
-6.
6
SCE’
s Pr
opos
al F
rom
Las
t W
orks
hop
•Id
entif
y K
ey O
vers
ight
Per
sonn
el (K
OP
) w
ho
“driv
e” th
e pr
ojec
t–
Cre
ate
an u
ndis
tribu
ted
staf
f cat
egor
y ca
lled
KO
P
–A
dd tw
o “c
heck
poin
ts” f
or u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s in
ND
CTP
s th
at d
o no
t alre
ady
have
“che
ckpo
ints
” in
the
Mile
ston
e Fr
amew
ork
(202
4, 2
030)
–Th
e K
OP
wou
ld b
e su
bjec
t to
all “
chec
kpoi
nts”
•A
ll ot
her u
ndis
tribu
ted
cost
s w
ill n
o lo
nger
be
subj
ect t
o “c
heck
poin
ts”
Dat
a R
eque
st 1
3 - Q
uest
ion
1a.
2016
-201
7 R
ecor
ded
SCE
Lab
or C
osts
In U
ndis
trib
uted
Lin
e It
ems
(201
4 D
olla
rs In
Mill
ions
, 100
% S
hare
) 2016
2017
DC
E L
ine
Des
crip
tion
Div
isio
n
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Est
imat
ed
SCE
Ave
rage
H
eadc
ount
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Est
imat
ed
SCE
Ave
rage
H
eadc
ount
1U
tility
Sta
ffSi
te M
anag
emen
t & A
dmin
istra
tion
3.2
$12
2.7
$9
2U
tility
Sta
ffD
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Fina
nce
--
0.4
3(1
)
3U
tility
Sta
ffR
egul
ator
y A
ffairs
& N
ucle
ar O
vers
ight
2.3
81.
77
4U
tility
Sta
ffO
pera
tions
9.3
457.
540
5U
tility
Sta
ffR
adio
logi
cal C
ontro
l & C
hem
istry
4.8
242.
617
6U
tility
Sta
ffM
aint
enan
ce &
Wor
k C
ontro
l4.
827
4.5
247
Util
ity S
taff
Engi
neer
ing
3.9
242.
916
8U
tility
Sta
ffEP
Pla
nnin
g0.
83
0.6
39
Util
ity S
taff
Secu
rity
Adm
in2.
5(2
)1.
9(3
)
10U
tility
Sta
ffD
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Ove
rsig
ht1.
611
1.8
1011
Util
ity S
taff
Sub
tota
l33
.3$
26.5
$12 13
Secu
rity
Forc
eSe
curit
y20
.2(2
)17
.4(3
)
14 15C
ontra
cted
Ser
vice
sSi
te M
anag
emen
t & A
dmin
istra
tion
0.1
10.
0-
16C
ontra
cted
Ser
vice
sD
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Fina
nce
0.4
2-
-17
Con
tract
ed S
ervi
ces
Reg
ulat
ory
Affa
irs &
Nuc
lear
Ove
rsig
ht0.
0-
--
18C
ontra
cted
Ser
vice
sO
pera
tions
0.1
10.
0-
19C
ontra
cted
Ser
vice
sM
aint
enan
ce &
Wor
k C
ontro
l0.
32
0.0
-20
Con
tract
ed S
ervi
ces
Engi
neer
ing
0.0
--
-21
Con
tract
ed S
ervi
ces
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g O
vers
ight
0.0
-0.
01
22C
ontr
acte
d Se
rvic
es S
ubto
tal
0.8
$6
0.1
$1
23 24Th
ird P
arty
Leg
alN
/A(1
.2)
-0.
0-
25 26Se
vera
nce
N/A
1.2
-3.
6-
27 28U
ndis
trib
uted
Tot
al54
.3$
313
47.5
$27
8
Gen
eral
Not
e:A
mou
nts m
ay n
ot ti
e du
e to
roun
ding
.
Not
es:
(2) T
he to
tal s
ecur
ity d
ivis
ion
estim
ated
hea
dcou
nt in
201
6 is
153
.(3
) The
tota
l sec
urity
div
isio
n es
timat
ed h
eadc
ount
in 2
017
is 1
48.
(1)
In Ju
ly 2
017,
the
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g Fi
nanc
e di
visi
on re
verte
d ba
ck fr
om a
Ser
vice
Lev
el A
gree
men
t to
the
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g A
gent
Org
aniz
atio
n. T
he h
eadc
ount
re
flect
s the
ave
rage
hea
dcou
nt o
ver t
he fu
ll ye
ar.
1 O
f 5
Dat
a R
eque
st 1
3 - Q
uest
ion
1a.
2016
-201
7 R
ecor
ded
SCE
Lab
or C
osts
In D
istr
ibut
ed L
ine
Item
s(2
014
Dol
lars
In M
illio
ns, 1
00%
Sha
re)
2016
2017
DC
E N
o.D
escr
iptio
n
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Est
imat
ed
SCE
FT
Es (1
)
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Est
imat
ed
SCE
FT
Es (1
)
1LT
-2-D
-2.1
9Im
plem
ent C
old
and
Dar
k (R
epow
er S
ite)
1.5
$7
-$
-2
LT-2
-D-2
.20
Inst
all 1
2 kV
Ser
vice
Lin
e to
Pow
er T
emp
Pow
er R
ing
0.7
40.
11
3LT
-2-D
-2.2
1D
rain
& D
e-En
ergi
ze N
on-E
ssen
tial S
yste
ms (
DEC
Pro
cess
)0.
63
0.0
-4
Initi
al D
&D
Act
iviti
es S
ubto
tal
2.8
$14
0.1
$1
5 6LT
-2-D
-2.2
6In
stal
l Spe
nt F
uel P
ool S
yste
m M
odifi
catio
ns -
Uni
t 20.
0-
--
7LT
-2-D
-2.2
7In
stal
l Spe
nt F
uel P
ool S
yste
m M
odifi
catio
ns -
Uni
t 30.
0-
--
8Sp
ent F
uel P
ool I
slan
ding
Sub
tota
l0.
0$
--
$
-
9 10LT
-2-D
-2.2
2Se
lect
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g G
ener
al C
ontra
ctor
(DG
C)
1.1
3-
-11 12
LT-2
-D-L
OED
Larg
e O
rgan
ism
Exc
lusi
on D
evic
e M
odifi
catio
n0.
11
0.0
-13 14
SNF-
2-D
-8.0
8D
esig
n IS
FSI E
xpan
sion
, Fue
l Ins
pect
ion,
and
Ove
rsig
ht0.
52
0.8
515
SNF-
2-D
-8.0
9C
onst
ruct
ISFS
I Exp
ansi
on0.
11
(0.0
)-
16 17SN
F-2-
D-8
.12
Load
Fue
l Can
iste
rs a
nd F
uel T
rans
fer O
pera
tions
- U
nit 2
--
0.0
18SN
F-2-
D-8
.13
Load
Fue
l Can
iste
rs a
nd F
uel T
rans
fer O
pera
tions
- U
nit 3
--
0.0
19L
oad
Fuel
Can
iste
rs a
nd F
uel T
rans
fer
Ope
ratio
ns S
ubto
tal
-$
-0.
0$
120 21
SNF-
2-D
-AM
Are
vaA
reva
ISFS
I Rel
icen
sing
--
0.0
-22
SNF-
2-D
-AM
Hol
tec1
Hol
tec
ISFS
I I&
M P
rogr
am D
evel
opm
ent
--
0.0
-23
ISFS
I Agi
ng M
anag
emen
t Sub
tota
l-
$-
0.1
$-
24 25SR
-1-D
-14.
01M
esa
Site
Pha
se I
and
II Si
te A
sses
smen
t and
Lea
se S
urre
nder
(0.0
)-
0.1
126 27
SR-3
-D-1
6.05
Obt
ain
CEQ
A P
erm
it &
App
rova
ls0.
62
0.3
128 29
SR-3
-D-1
6.03
Initi
al R
eal E
stat
e A
utho
rizat
ion
Ren
ewal
and
Pla
nt E
asem
ent
0.2
10.
11
30 31D
istr
ibut
ed T
otal
5.5
$24
1.5
$10
Gen
eral
Not
e:A
mou
nts m
ay n
ot ti
e du
e to
roun
ding
.
Not
e:(1
) The
hea
dcou
nt o
r FTE
s of S
CE
pers
onne
l rec
ordi
ng to
dis
tribu
ted
activ
ities
is n
ot a
vaila
ble.
The
refo
re, t
he F
TEs w
ere
estim
ated
bas
ed o
n an
ave
rage
rate
cal
cula
ted
for e
ach
DC
E lin
e ite
m.
2 O
f 5
Dat
a R
eque
st 1
3 - Q
uest
ion
1b.
2016
- 20
17 R
ecor
ded
Cor
e C
ontr
acto
r C
osts
In U
ndis
trib
uted
Lin
e It
ems
(201
4 D
olla
rs In
Mill
ions
, 100
% S
hare
)
2016
2017
DC
E L
ine
Des
crip
tion
Div
isio
nC
ontr
act
Lab
or C
osts
Con
trac
t L
abor
Cos
ts1
Util
ity S
taff
Site
Man
agem
ent &
Adm
inis
tratio
n0.
0$
1.3
$2
Util
ity S
taff
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g Fi
nanc
e-
0.1
3U
tility
Sta
ffR
egul
ator
y A
ffai
rs &
Nuc
lear
Ove
rsig
ht0.
20.
44
Util
ity S
taff
Ope
ratio
ns0.
20.
85
Util
ity S
taff
Rad
iolo
gica
l Con
trol &
Che
mis
try0.
20.
86
Util
ity S
taff
Mai
nten
ance
& W
ork
Con
trol
0.3
0.2
7U
tility
Sta
ffEn
gine
erin
g1.
21.
28
Util
ity S
taff
EP P
lann
ing
0.1
0.0
9U
tility
Sta
ffSe
curit
y0.
20.
210
Util
ity S
taff
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g O
vers
ight
5.6
5.9
11U
tility
Sta
ff S
ubto
tal
Util
ity S
taff
Sub
tota
l8.
1$
11.0
$12 13
Secu
rity
Forc
eSe
curit
y0.
40.
914 15
Und
istr
ibut
ed T
otal
8.6
$11
.9$
Gen
eral
Not
es:
(ii) A
mou
nts m
ay n
ot ti
e du
e to
roun
ding
.
(i) T
he h
eadc
ount
of c
ore
cont
ract
ors r
ecor
ding
to u
ndis
tribu
ted
labo
r lin
e ite
ms i
s not
trac
ked.
The
refo
re, h
eadc
ount
in
form
atio
n ca
nnot
be
prov
ided
.
3 O
f 5
Dat
a R
eque
st 1
3 - Q
uest
ion
1b.
2016
- 20
17 E
stim
ated
Con
trac
tor
Hea
dcou
nt In
Dis
trib
uted
Lin
e It
ems
DC
E N
o.D
escr
iptio
n
2016
Est
imat
ed
Con
trac
tor
Hea
dcou
nt
2017
Est
imat
ed
Con
trac
tor
Hea
dcou
nt1
LT-2
-D-2
.18
Plan
ning
& D
esig
n Fo
r Col
d an
d D
ark
2LT
-2-D
-2.1
9Im
plem
ent C
old
and
Dar
k (R
epow
er S
ite)
3LT
-2-D
-2.2
0In
stal
l 12
kV S
ervi
ce L
ine
to P
ower
Tem
p Po
wer
Rin
g4
LT-2
-D-2
.21
Dra
in &
De-
Ener
gize
Non
-Ess
entia
l Sys
tem
s (D
EC P
roce
ss)
5LT
-2-D
-2.2
9Im
plem
ent C
ontro
l Roo
m M
odifi
catio
ns (C
omm
and
Cen
ter R
eloc
atio
n)6
Initi
al D
&D
Act
iviti
es S
ubto
tal
12(1
)T
BD
(2)
7 8LT
-2-D
-2.2
6In
stal
l Spe
nt F
uel P
ool S
yste
m M
odifi
catio
ns -
Uni
t 29
LT-2
-D-2
.27
Inst
all S
pent
Fue
l Poo
l Sys
tem
Mod
ifica
tions
- U
nit 3
10Sp
ent F
uel I
slan
ding
Sub
tota
l1
(1)
TB
D(2
)
11 12LT
-2-D
-2.2
2Se
lect
Dec
omm
issi
onin
g G
ener
al C
ontra
ctor
(DG
C)
6-
13 14SN
F-2-
D-8
.08
Des
ign
ISFS
I Exp
ansi
on, F
uel I
nspe
ctio
n, a
nd O
vers
ight
916
15 16SN
F-2-
D-A
M A
reva
Are
va IS
FSI R
elic
ensi
ng17
SNF-
2-D
-AM
Hol
tec1
Hol
tec
ISFS
I I&
M P
rogr
am D
evel
opm
ent
18IS
FSI A
ging
Man
agem
ent S
ubto
tal
1(1
)1
(1)
19 20SR
-1-D
-14.
01M
esa
Site
Pha
se I
and
II Si
te A
sses
smen
t and
Lea
se S
urre
nder
21SR
-2-D
-15.
09M
esa
Bui
ldin
gs -
Dem
o, M
aint
enan
ce22
Mes
a Si
te T
urno
ver
Subt
otal
1(1
)1
(1)
23 24LT
-3-D
-DC
ED
CE
Upd
ate
-1
25 26SR
-3-D
-16.
05O
btai
n C
EQA
Per
mit
& A
ppro
vals
1-
27 28SN
F-1-
D-7
.05
Cyb
er S
ecur
ity M
odifi
catio
ns4
129 30
Dis
trib
uted
Tot
al35
20
Not
es:
(1) E
stim
ated
hea
dcou
nt is
onl
y av
aila
ble
at th
e m
ajor
pro
ject
leve
l and
is n
ot b
roke
n ou
t by
indi
vidu
al D
CE
line
item
.(2
) Est
imat
ed h
eadc
ount
will
be
popu
late
d on
ce th
e in
form
atio
n is
ava
ilabl
e.
4 O
f 5
Dat
a R
eque
st 1
3 - Q
uest
ion
1c.
2016
-201
7 R
ecor
ded
SCE
Lab
or C
osts
In S
ervi
ce L
evel
Agr
eem
ents
(201
4 D
olla
rs In
Mill
ions
, 100
% S
hare
)
2016
2017
Serv
ice
Lev
el A
gree
men
t
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Aut
hori
zed
FTE
s (1)
SCE
Lab
or
(Inc
ludi
ng
Ove
rhea
ds)
Aut
hori
zed
FTE
s (1)
1A
udit
Serv
ices
-$
-0.
2$
2.0
2C
ontro
llers
--
0.6
4.2
3C
orpo
rate
Com
mun
icat
ions
0.2
1.0
0.1
1.0
4C
orpo
rate
Sec
urity
--
0.1
0.9
5D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
Fina
nce
0.7
5.0
0.4
5.0
6En
viro
nmen
tal P
olic
y-
-0.
20.
77
Envi
ronm
enta
l Ser
vice
s0.
10.
60.
42.
68
Hum
an R
esou
rces
--
0.7
4.7
9In
form
atio
n Te
chno
logy
1.6
14.0
1.2
13.0
10Le
gal
--
1.1
3.9
11Lo
cal P
ublic
Affa
irs-
-0.
10.
512
Rea
l Pro
perti
es0.
21.
00.
00.
313
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t-
-0.
00.
214
Supp
ly M
anag
emen
t0.
74.
00.
63.
015
Tax
--
0.0
0.3
16Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
--
(0.0
)-
17Tr
easu
rers
--
0.2
1.6
18T
otal
3.5
$25
.65.
9$
43.7
Gen
eral
Not
e:A
mou
nts m
ay n
ot ti
e du
e to
roun
ding
.
Not
e:(1
) FTE
s are
equ
al to
the
num
ber o
f FTE
s agr
eed
to in
Ser
vice
Lev
el A
gree
men
ts (i
.e.,
are
not b
ased
on
reco
rded
co
sts)
.
5 O
f 5
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding
))))))
A.18-03-009 (Filed March 15, 2018)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of JOINT STATUS REPORT on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) A.18-03-009. Service was effected by one or more means indicated below:
☒ Transmitting the copies via e-mail to specified parties who have provided an e-mail address.
☒ Placing the copies in sealed envelopes and depositing such copies in the United States mail with first-class postage prepaid to the offices of the Commissioner(s) or other addressee(s).
ALJ Darcie Houck California Public Utilities Commission Division of ALJs 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 518 Sacramento, CA 95814
Executed on April 30, 2019, at Rosemead, California.
___/s/ Edith Leon________________ Edith Leon Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
CPUC Home
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists
PROCEEDING: A1803009 - EDISON AND SDG&E - F FILER: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: FEBRUARY 20, 2019
Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files
Back to Service Lists Index
Parties
WALKER A. MATTHEWS, III ALLEN K. TRIAL ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE / PO BOX 800 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
MATTHEW FREEDMAN JOHN L. GEESMAN ATTORNEY ATTORNEY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 785 MARKET STREET, 14TH FL. 1999 HARRISON STREET, STE. 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 OAKLAND, CA 94612 FOR: TURN FOR: ALLIANCE FOR NUCLEAR RESPONSIBILITY
WILLIAM MAGUIRE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION 300 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814 FOR: PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE
Information Only
MRW & ASSOCIATES, LLC BRUCE LACY EMAIL ONLY LACY CONSULTING GROUP, LLC EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 433 WILEY BLVD., NW CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52405
Page 1 of 3CPUC - Service Lists - A1803009
4/30/2019https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/A1803009_85397.htm
FOR: TURN
LAURA L. KRANNAWITTER DANIEL DOUGLASS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ATTORNEY MARKET STRUCTURE, COSTS AND NATURAL GAS DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 320 West 4th Street Suite 500 4766 PARK GRANADA, SUITE 209 Los Angeles, CA 90013 CALABASAS, CA 91302
CASE ADMINISTRATION SIMONE S. BRYAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY PROJECT / PROGRAM ANALYST 8631 RUSH STREET SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
DONALD KELLY, ESQ. CENTRAL FILES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP31E 3405 KENYON STREET, STE 401 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110
EMMA D. SALUSTRO WENDY D. JOHNSON ATTORNEY REGULATORY CASE MGR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32D 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32F SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
ROCHELLE BECKER DAVID PECK EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ALLIANCE FOR NUCLEAR RESPONSIBILITY PRESIDENT PICKER EMAIL ONLY ROOM 4108 EMAIL ONLY, CA 93406 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
ERIC GREENE TRUMAN L. BURNS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MARKET STRUCTURE, COSTS AND NATURAL GAS ENERGY COST OF SERVICE & NATURAL GAS BRA AREA 4-A ROOM 4205 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
YAKOV LASKO AMIE BURKHOLDER CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ENERGY COST OF SERVICE & NATURAL GAS BRA 55 SECOND STREET, STE. 1700 ROOM 4101 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
CASE COORDINATION KELSEY PIRO PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CASE MGR. PO BOX 770000; MC B9A, 77 BEALE STREET PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 77 BEALE STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
Page 2 of 3CPUC - Service Lists - A1803009
4/30/2019https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/A1803009_85397.htm
MIKE CADE JENNIFER POST BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 55 SECOND STREET, SUITE 1700 PO BOX 770000, MAIL CODE B30A SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94177
LINDSEY HOW-DOWNING DARCIE HOUCK ATTORNEY CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LAW OFFICES OF LINDSEY HOW-DOWNING EXECUTIVE DIVISION 3060 EL CERRITO PLAZA, NO. 175 300 Capitol Mall EL CERRITO, CA 94530 Sacramento, CA 95814
TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS
Page 3 of 3CPUC - Service Lists - A1803009
4/30/2019https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/A1803009_85397.htm
