67
Bibliography Aadland, Einar and Morten Skjørshammer (2012), ‘From God to Good? Faith- based Institutions in the Secular Society’, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, vol 9, no 1, pp. 83–101. Abell, Peter (1995), ‘The New Institutionalism and Rational Choice Theory’, in Scott, W. Richard and Christensen, Søren, The Institutional Construction of Organisations, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, pp. 3–14. Abell, Peter (2008), Organisation Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach, London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Adkins, Julie and Robert V. Kemper (2006), ‘Oasis Housing Corporation: From Solutions to Dissolution in a Faith-based Organization’, Urban Anthopology, vol 35, nos 2–3, pp. 237–264. Adler, Gary: see Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez, Catherine Hoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008). Adler, Paul (1999), ‘The Emancipatory Significance of Taylorism’, in Cunha, M.P.A. and Marques, C.A. (eds), Readings in Organization Science: Organizational Change in a Changing Context, Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, pp. 7–14. Aiken, Mike (2010), ‘Social Enterprises: Challenges from the Field’, in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–174. Alchian, Armen and Harold Demsetz (1972), ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, vol 62, no 5, pp. 777–795. Ali, Haider: see Paton, Rob, Haider Ali, and Lee Taylor (2009). Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott (1992), Critical Management Studies, London: Sage. Amirkhanyan, Anna, Joon Kim Hyun and Kristina Lambright (2009), ‘Faith- based Assumptions about Performance’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 38, no 3, pp. 490–521. Ammerman, Nancy Tatom, et al. (1997), Congregation and Community, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez, Catherine Hoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008) ‘Dearly Departed: How Often do Congre- gations Close?’ Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 47, no 2, pp. 321–328. Angell, Olav Helge (2010), ‘Sacred Welfare Agents in Secular Welfare Space: The Church of Norway in Drammen’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 57–75. Archbishop of Canterbury’s Commission on Urban Priority Areas, The (1985), Faith in the City: A Call for Action by Church and Nation, London: Church House Publishing. 204

Bibliography - link.springer.com978-1-137-43928-4/1.pdf · How Institutions Shape Organizational Process’, in Demerath III ... Socialisation’, Voluntary Sector ... Variable Goals

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bibliography

Aadland, Einar and Morten Skjørshammer (2012), ‘From God to Good? Faith-based Institutions in the Secular Society’, Journal of Management, Spirituality &Religion, vol 9, no 1, pp. 83–101.

Abell, Peter (1995), ‘The New Institutionalism and Rational Choice Theory’,in Scott, W. Richard and Christensen, Søren, The Institutional Construction ofOrganisations, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, pp. 3–14.

Abell, Peter (2008), Organisation Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach, London:London School of Economics and Political Science.

Adkins, Julie and Robert V. Kemper (2006), ‘Oasis Housing Corporation: FromSolutions to Dissolution in a Faith-based Organization’, Urban Anthopology,vol 35, nos 2–3, pp. 237–264.

Adler, Gary: see Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez, CatherineHoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008).

Adler, Paul (1999), ‘The Emancipatory Significance of Taylorism’, in Cunha,M.P.A. and Marques, C.A. (eds), Readings in Organization Science: OrganizationalChange in a Changing Context, Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada,pp. 7–14.

Aiken, Mike (2010), ‘Social Enterprises: Challenges from the Field’, in Billis, David(ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory andPolicy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–174.

Alchian, Armen and Harold Demsetz (1972), ‘Production, Information Costs, andEconomic Organization’, American Economic Review, vol 62, no 5, pp. 777–795.

Ali, Haider: see Paton, Rob, Haider Ali, and Lee Taylor (2009).Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott (1992), Critical Management Studies, London:

Sage.Amirkhanyan, Anna, Joon Kim Hyun and Kristina Lambright (2009), ‘Faith-

based Assumptions about Performance’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,vol 38, no 3, pp. 490–521.

Ammerman, Nancy Tatom, et al. (1997), Congregation and Community, NewBrunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez, Catherine Hoegeman, GaryAdler and Mark Chaves (2008) ‘Dearly Departed: How Often do Congre-gations Close?’ Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 47, no 2,pp. 321–328.

Angell, Olav Helge (2010), ‘Sacred Welfare Agents in Secular Welfare Space: TheChurch of Norway in Drammen’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds),Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections,Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 57–75.

Archbishop of Canterbury’s Commission on Urban Priority Areas, The (1985),Faith in the City: A Call for Action by Church and Nation, London: Church HousePublishing.

204

Bibliography 205

Archbishops’ Commission (1995), Working as One Body: The Report of theArchbishops’ Commission on the Organisation of the Church of England, London:Church House Publishing [The Turnbull Report].

Bäckström, Anders and Grace Davie (2010), Welfare and Religion in 21st CenturyEurope: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections, Farnham: Ashgate.

Bäckström, Anders and Grace Davie (2011), Welfare and Religion in 21st CenturyEurope: Volume 2: Gendered, Religious and Social Change, Farnham: Ashgate.

Badham, Richard: see Buchanan, David and Richard Badham (1999).Baker, Christopher (2009), ‘Blurred Encounters? Religious Literacy, Spiritual Cap-

ital and Language’, in Dinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert and Lowndes, Vivien(eds), Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies and Practices, Bristol: PolicyPress, pp. 105–122.

Ballard, Paul: see Brown, Malcolm and Paul Ballard (eds) (2006).Barker, Eileen (ed.) (1982), New Religious Movements: A Perspective for Understanding

Society, New York and Toronto: Edwin Meller Press.Barker, Eileen (1983), ‘New Religious Movements in Britain: The Context and the

Membership’, Social Compass, vol 30, no 1, pp. 33–48.Becker, Penny Edgell (1998), ‘Congregational Models and Conflict: A Study of

How Institutions Shape Organizational Process’, in Demerath III, N.J., PeterDobkin Hall, Terry Schmitt and Rhys H. Williams (eds), Sacred Companies: Orga-nizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations, New York andOxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–235.

Beckford, James A. (1972), ‘The Embryonic Stage of a Religious Sect’s Devel-opment: The Jehovah’s Witnesses’, in Michael, Hill (ed.), A Sociological Year-book of Religion in Britain, vol.V, London: Student Christian Movement,pp. 11–32.

Beckford, James A. (1975a), ‘Organization, Ideology and Recruitment: TheStructure of the Watch Tower Movement’, Sociological Review, vol 23, no 4,pp. 893–909.

Beckford, James A. (1978), ‘Sociological Stereotypes of the Religious Sect’, Socio-logical Review, vol 26, no 1, pp. 109–123.

Beckford, James A. (1985), Cult Controversies: The Societal Response to New ReligiousMovements, London and New York: Tavistock.

Beckford, J.A. (2001), ‘Religious Organizations’, International Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Behavioral Sciences, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767040201, pp. 13127–13132.

Bekkers, René: see Carabain, Christine L. and René Bekkers (2011).Bekkers, René and Pamala Wiepking (2011), ‘Who Gives? A Literature Review

of Predictors of Charitable Giving: Part One: Religion, Education, Age andSocialisation’, Voluntary Sector Review, vol 2, no 3, pp. 337–365.

Bellamy, John: see Leonard, Rosemary and John Bellamy (2010).Benson, J. Kenneth and James H. Dorsett (1971), ‘Toward a Theory of Reli-

gious Organizations’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 10, no 2,pp. 139–151.

Bentham, Jeremy: see Mill, John Stuart and Jeremy Bentham (ed Alan Ryan)(1987).

Berger, Peter (1969), The Sacred Canopy, Doubleday, New York.Berger, Peter L. (1977), Facing up to Modernity, New York: Basic Books.Beyer, Janice M.: see Trice, Harrison M. and Janice M. Beyer (1993).

206 Bibliography

Bibby, Reginald W. and Armand L. Mauss (1974), ‘Skidders and their Servants:Variable Goals and Functions of the Skid Road Rescue Mission’, Journal for theScientific Study of Religion, vol 13, no 2, pp. 421–436.

Biebricher, Thomas (2011), ‘Faith-based Initiatives and the Challenges of Gover-nance’, Public Administration, vol 89, no 3, pp. 1001–1014.

Bielefeld, Wolfgang and William Suhs Cleveland (2013), ‘Defining Faith-BasedOrganizations and Understanding Them Through Research’, Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 42, no 3, 442–467.

Billis, David (2001), ‘Tackling Social Exclusion: The Contribution of Vol-untary Organisations’, in Harris, Margaret and Rochester, Colin (eds),Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave,pp. 37–48.

Billis, David (2010), ‘Towards a Theory of Hybrid Organizations’, in Billis, David(ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory andPolicy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 46–69.

Bolden, Dean A. (1985), ‘Organizational Characteristics of Ecumenically ActiveDenominations’, Sociological Analysis, vol 46, no 3, pp. 261–274.

Bomford, Rodney (1992), ‘Are you a Groupie, Crowdie, or Clubbie?’ Church Times,10th April 1992.

Bradford, David L.: see Cohen, Allan R. and David L. Bradford (1989).Bradstock, Andrew: see Davis, Francis, Elizabeth Paulhus and Andrew Bradstock

(2008).Brierley, Peter (2010), God’s Questions: Vision, Strategy and Growth, Tonbridge:

ADBC Publishers.Brown, Malcolm and Paul Ballard (eds) (2006), The Church and Economic Life:

A Documentary Study: 1945 to the Present, Peterborough: Epworth Press.Brown, Michael: see Trevino, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael

Brown (2000).Bruce, Stephen (1995), Religion in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Buchanan, David A.: see Huczynski, Andrezej A. and David A. Buchanan

(2007).Buchanan, David and Richard Badham (1999), Power, Politics and Organizational

Change: Winning the Turf Game, London: Sage.Buller, Paul F. (1988), ‘For Successful Strategic Change: Blend OD Prac-

tices with Strategic Management’, Organizational Dynamics, vol 16, no 3,pp. 42–55.

Burke, Edmund (1993), Reflections on the Revolution in France, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Burns, Arthur (1999), The Diocesan Revival in the Church of England c.1800–1870,Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Butler, D. Martin and Robert D. Herman (1999), ‘Effective Ministerial Leadership’,Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 9, no 3, pp. 229–239.

Byrd, Michael (1997), ‘Determining Frames of Reference for Religiously BasedOrganization: A Case of Neo-Alinsky Efforts to Mobilize CongregationalResources’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 26, pp. 122–188.

Cabage, Liann N.: see Dodson, Kimberly D., Liann N. Cabage and PaulM. Klenowski (2011).

Cairns, Ben: see Hutchison, Romayne and Ben Cairns (2010).Calley, Malcolm J.C. (1965), God’s People: West Indian Pentecostal Sects in England,

London and New York: Oxford University Press.

Bibliography 207

Cameron, Helen E. (1998), ‘The Social Action of the Local Church: Five Con-gregations in an English City’, Unpublished PhD thesis, London School ofEconomics.

Campbell, David (2002), ‘Beyond Charitable Choice: The Diverse Service DeliveryApproaches of Local Faith-related Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 31, pp. 207–227.

Caputo, Richard (2009), ‘Religious Capital and Intergenerational Transmission ofVolunteering as Correlates of Civic Engagement’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 38, no 6, pp. 983–1002.

Carabain, Christine L. and René Bekkers (2011), ‘Religious and Secular Vol-unteering: A Comparison between Immigrants and Non-Immigrants in theNetherlands’, Voluntary Sector Review, vol 2, no 1, pp. 23–41.

Carver, Mary L.: see Kinney, Nancy T. and Mary L. Carver (2007).Casanova, José (1994), Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: University

of Chicago Press.Cavan, Ruth (1977), ‘From Social Movement to Organized Society: The Case

of the Anabaptists’, Journal of Voluntary Action Research, vol 6, nos 3–4,pp. 105–111.

Chafetz, Janet Saltzman: see Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Paula F. Pipes, Janet SaltzmanChafetz and Martha Daniels (2003).

Chafetz, Janet S.: see Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Janet S. Chafetz and Paula F. Pipes(2007).

Chapin, F.S. and J.E. Tsouderos (1956), ‘The Formalisation Process in VoluntaryAssociations’, Social Forces, vol 34, no 4, pp. 342–344.

Chapman, Rachael (2009), ‘Faith and the Voluntary Sector in Urban Governance:Distinctive yet Similar?’ in Dinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert and Lowndes, Vivien(eds), Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies and Practices, Bristol: PolicyPress, pp. 203–222.

Chapman, Rachael and Vivian Lowndes (2009), ‘Accountable, Authorized orAuthentic? What do Faith Representatives Offer Urban Governance?’ PublicMoney and Management, vol 29, no 6, pp. 371–378.

Chaves, Mark (1993a), ‘Denominations as Dual Structures: An OrganizationalAnalysis’, Sociology of Religion, vol 54, no 2, pp. 147–169.

Chaves, Mark (1993b), ‘Intraorganizational Power and Internal Secularization inProtestant Denominations’, American Journal of Sociology, vol 99, no 1, pp. 1–48.

Chaves, Mark: see Kniss, Fed and Mark Chaves (1995).Chaves, Mark: see Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez, Catherine

Hoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008).Chaves, Mark and Lynn M. Higgins (1992) ‘Comparing the Community Involve-

ment of Black and White Congregations’, Journal for the Scientific Study ofReligion, vol 31, no 4, pp. 425–440.

Chaves, Mark and John R. Sutton (2004), ‘Organizational Consolidation inAmerican Protestant Denominations, 1890–1990’, Journal for the Scientific Studyof Religion, vol 43, no 1, pp. 51–66.

Chaves, Mark and William Tsitsos (2001), ‘Congregations and Social Services:What they Do, How they Do it, and with Whom’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 30, pp. 660–682.

Chaves, Mark and Bob Wineburg (2010), ‘Did the Faith-based InitiativeChange Congregations?’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 39, no 2,pp. 343–355.

208 Bibliography

Child, J. (1972), ‘Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: TheRole of Strategic Choice’, Sociology, vol 6, no 1, pp. 1–22.

Child, John (1984), A Guide to Problems and Practice, 2nd edition, London: Harperand Row.

Choe, Jae-Hyeon (1980), ‘The Range of Voluntary Association Activity in Depen-dent Capitalism: The Case of Urban Industrial Mission in South Korea’, Journalof Voluntary Action Research, vol 9, nos 1–4, pp. 124–130.

Christensen, Søren: see Scott, W. Richard and Søren Christensen (1995).Clark, David B. (1970), ‘Local and Cosmopolitan Aspects of Religious Activity in

a Northern Suburb’, in Martin, David (ed.), A Sociological Yearbook of Religion inBritain, vol III, London: Student Christian Movement, pp. 45–63.

Clark, David B. (1971), ‘Local and Cosmopolitan Aspects of Religious Activity ina Northern Suburb: Processes of Change’, in Martin, David (ed.), A SociologicalYearbook of Religion in Britain, vol IV, London: Student Christian Movement,pp. 141–159.

Cleveland, William Suhs: see Bielefeld, Wolfgang and William Suhs Cleveland(2013).

Cnaan, Ram (1997), Social and Community Involvement of Religious CongregationsHoused in Historic Religious Properties: Findings from a Six-city Study Programfor the Study of Organized Religion and Social Work, Philadelphia: University ofPennsylvania.

Cnaan, Ram A. (2002), The Invisible Hand: American Congregations and the Provisionof Welfare, New York: New York University Press.

Cnaan, Ram A., Amy Kasternakis and Robert J. Wineburg (1993), ‘Religious Peo-ple, Religious Congregations, and Volunteerism in Human Services: Is there aLink?’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 22, no 1, pp. 33–51.

Cohen, Allan R. and David L. Bradford (1989), ‘Influence Without Author-ity: The Use of Alliances, Reciprocity, and Exchange to Accomplish Work’,Organizational Dynamics, vol 17, no 3, pp. 5–17.

Cole Durham, W. (2010), ‘Legal Status of Religious Organizations: A ComparativeOverview’, Review of Faith and International Affairs, vol 8, no 2, pp. 3–14.

Cormode, D. Scott (1998), ‘Does Institutional Isomorphism Imply Secularization?Churches and Secular Voluntary Associations in the Turn-of-the-Century City’,in Demerath III, N.J., Hall, Peter Dobkin, Schmitt, Terry and Williams, Rhys H.(eds), Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects ofOrganizations, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–131.

Daft, Richard L. (2006), The New Era of Management, Ohio: Thomson.Daniels, Martha: see Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Paula F. Pipes, Janet Saltzman Chafetz

and Martha Daniels (2003).Davidson, James D., Ronald Elly, Thomas Hull and Donald Need (1979), ‘Increas-

ing Church Involvement in Social Concern: A Model for Urban Ministries’,Review of Religious Research, vol 20, no 3, pp. 291–314.

Davie, Grace (1994), Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging,Oxford: Blackwell.

Davie, Grace: see Bäckström, Anders and Grace Davie (2010 and 2011).Davis, Francis (2009a), ‘Faith Advocacy and the EU Anti-Poverty Process: A Case

of Caritas’, Public Money and Management, vol 29, no 6, pp. 379–386.Davis, Francis (2009b), ‘Editorial’, Public Money and Management, vol 29, no 6,

pp. 333–340.

Bibliography 209

Davis, Francis, Elizabeth Paulhus and Andrew Bradstock (2008), Moral, but noCompass: Government, Church and the Future of Welfare, Chelmsford: MatthewJames Publishing.

Davis, J. (ed.) (1982), Religious Organization and Religious Experience, London:Academic Press.

Deakin, Nicholas (2001), In Search of Civil Society, Basingstoke: Palgrave.de Jong, Anisa: see Fink, Janet, Anisa de Jong and Mary Langan (2011).Demerath III, N.J. and Philip E. Hammond (1969) Religion in Social Context:

Tradition and Transition, New York: Random House.Demsetz, Harold: see Alchian, Armen and Harold Demsetz (1972).DiIulio, John J. (1998), ‘The Lord’s Work: The Church and Civil Society’, in

Dionne, E.J. (ed.), Community Works: The Revival of Civil Society in America,Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press, pp. 50–58.

DiMaggio, Paul J.: see Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio (1991).DiMaggio, Paul and W. Powell (1983), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Conformity

and Diversity in Organisational Fields’, American Sociological Review, vol 48,pp. 147–160.

DiMaggio, Paul and W. Powell (1991), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: InstitutionalIsomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organisational Fields’, in Powell,Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul (ed.), The New Institutionalism in OrganisationalAnalysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82.

Dinham, Adam and Robert Jackson (2012), ‘Religion, Welfare and Education’,in Woodhead, Linda and Rebecca, Catto (eds), Religion and Change in ModernBritain, London: Routledge, pp. 272–294.

Dinham, Adam and Vivien Lowndes (2009), ‘Faith and the Public Realm’, inDinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert and Lowndes, Vivien (eds), Faith in the PublicRealm: Controversies, Policies and Practices, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–19.

Dinham, Adam and Martha Shaw (2012), ‘Measurement as Reflection in Faith-based Social Action’, Community Development Journal, vol 47, no 1, pp. 126–141.

Dittes, James E. (1971), ‘Typing the Typologies: Some Parallels in the Career ofChurch-Sect and Extrinsic-Intrinsic’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,vol 10, no 4, pp. 375–383.

Dodson, Kimberly D., Liann N. Cabage and Paul M. Klenowski (2011),‘An Evidence-based Assessment of Faith-based Programs: Do Faith-based Pro-grams “Work” to Reduce Recidivism?’ Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, vol 50,no 6, pp. 367–383.

Dorsett, James H.: see Benson, J. Kenneth and James H. Dorsett (1971).Dougherty, Kevin D.: see Finke, Roger and Kevin D. Dougherty (2002).Douglas, Mary (1970), Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, London: Barrie

and Rockliff.Douglass, Truman B. (1960), ‘Ecological Change and the Church’, The Annals of

the Academy of Political and Social Science, vol 332, no 1, pp. 80–88.Douma, Sytse and Hein Schreuder (2008), Economic Approaches to Organizations,

4th edition, Harlow: Pearson.Drane, John (2010), ‘From Creeds to Burgers: Religious Control, Spiritual Search,

and the Future of the World’, in Ritzer, G. (ed.), McDonaldization: The Reader,3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press, pp. 222–227.

Dulles, Avery (2002), Models of the Church, expanded edition, New York:Doubleday.

210 Bibliography

Duncan, Robert B. (1972), ‘Characteristics of Organizational Environments andPerceived Environmental Uncertainty’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol 17,no 3, pp. 313–327.

Duncan, Robert B. (1973), ‘Multiple Decision-making Structures in Adaptingto Environmental Uncertainty: The Impact on Organizational Effectiveness’,Human Relations, vol 26, no 3, pp. 273–291.

Dunlap, Knight (1970 [1946]), Religion: Its Functions in Human Life: A Study ofReligion from the Point of View of Psychology, Westport, Connecticut: GreenwoodPress.

Dyck, Bruno (1996), ‘The Role of Crises and Opportunities in OrganizationalChange: A Look at a Nonprofit Religious College’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 25, no 3, pp. 321–346.

Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Janet S. Chafetz and Paula F. Pipes (2007), ‘Collabora-tions with Faith-based Social Service Coalitions’, Nonprofit Management andLeadership, vol 18, no 2, pp. 175–191.

Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Paula F. Pipes, Janet Saltzman Chafetz, and Martha Daniels(2003), ‘Where’s the Religion? Distinguishing Faith-based from Secular SocialService Agencies’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 42, no 3,pp. 411–426.

Ecclestone, G.S. (1981), The Church of England and Politics, London: ChurchInformation Office.

Edgardh, Ninna (2011), ‘A Gendered Perspective on Welfare and Religion inEurope’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare and Religion in21st Century Europe: Volume 2: Gendered, Religious and Social Change, Farnham:Ashgate, pp. 62–106.

Ekstrand, Thomas (2011), ‘Thinking Theologically about Welfare and Religion’,in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare and Religion in 21st Cen-tury Europe: Volume 2: Gendered, Religious and Social Change, Farnham: Ashgate,pp. 107–150.

Elster, Jon (1989), ‘Social Norms and Economic Theory’, Journal of EconomicPerspectives, vol 3, no 4, pp. 99–117.

Engahl, Richard L. (1991), ‘Religious Fund-Raising: The Theology of Stewardship’,Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 1, no 4, pp. 345–356.

Ernst, Chris: see Yip, Jeffrey, Edmund Twohill, Chris Ernst and VijayanP. Munusamy (2010).

Farnell, Richard (2009), ‘Faiths, Government and Regeneration: A Contested Dis-course’, in Dinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert and Lowndes, Vivien (eds), Faithin the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies and Practices, Bristol: Policy Press,pp. 183–202.

Farnell, Richard, Robert Furbey, Stephen Shams, Al-Haqq Hills, Marie Macey andGreg Smith (2003), ‘Faith’ in Urban Regeneration? Engaging Faith Communities inUrban Regeneration, Bristol: Policy Press.

Farnsley, Arthur E.II. (2001), ‘Can Faith-Based Organizations Compete?’ Nonprofitand Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 30, no 1, pp. 99–111.

Fiedler, Fred E. (1954), ‘Assumed Similarity Measures as Predictors of Team Effec-tiveness’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol 49, no 3, pp. 381–388.

Fiedler, Fred E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, New York:McGraw-Hill.

Bibliography 211

Fink, Janet, Anisa de Jong and Mary Langan (2011), ‘New Challenges or Differ-ent Opportunities? Voluntary Adoption Agencies and the Shifting Terrain ofChildcare Services’, Voluntary Sector Review, vol 2, no 2, pp. 177–191.

Finke, Roger and Patricia Wittberg (2000), ‘Organizational Revival from Within:Explaining Revivalism and Reform in the Roman Catholic Church’, Journal forthe Scientific Study of Religion, vol 39, no 2, pp. 154–170.

Finneron, Doreen (1993), Faith in Community Development: Case Studies of ChurchBased Community Development Projects in Urban Priority Areas, Manchester:University of Manchester.

Fischer, Robert L. (2004), ‘The Devil is in the Details: Implementing Secu-lar Outcome Measurement Methods in Faith-based Organizations’, NonprofitManagement and Leadership, vol 15, no 1, pp. 25–40.

Flagg, David (2013), Correspondence with the author, 13 January 2013.Flanigan, Shawn Teresa (2010), ‘Factors Influencing Nonprofit Career Choice

in Faith-based and Secular NGOs in Three Developing Countries’, NonprofitManagement and Leadership, vol 21, no 1, pp. 59–75.

Fokas, Effie and Lina Molokotos-Liederman (2010), ‘The Disgraceful and theDivine in Greek Welfare: The Cases of Thiva and Livadeia’, in Bäckström,Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe:Volume 1: Configuring the Connections, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 167–182.

Foucault, Michel (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (tr AlanSheridan) London: Penguin.

Fritz, David and Nabil Ibrahim (2010), ‘The Impact of Leadership Longevity onInnovation in a Religious Organization’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol 96, no 2,pp. 223–231.

Furbey, Robert: see Farnell, Richard, Robert Furbey, Stephen Shams, Al-Haqq Hills,Marie Macey and Greg Smith (2003).

Gill, Robin (ed.) (1996), Theology and Sociology: A Reader, New and Enlargededition, London: Cassell.

Göçmen, Ipek (2013), ‘The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in SocialWelfare Systems: A Comparison of France, Germany, Sweden, and theUnited Kingdom’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 42, no 3,pp. 495–516.

Goldman, Marion S. (2006), ‘Cults, New Religions, and the Spiritual Landscape:A Review of Four Collections’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 45,no 1, pp. 87–96.

Gorringe, T.J. (2002), A Theology of the Built Environment: Justice, Empowerment,Redemption, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grassman, Eva Jeppsson (2010), ‘Welfare in Western Europe: Existing Regimesand Patterns of Change’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Wel-fare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections,Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 25–37.

Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. and Sheila Nelson (1998), ‘Mapping Small Religious Non-profit Organizations: An Illinois Profile’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,vol 27, no 1, pp. 13–31.

Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. and Brent Never (2004), ‘The Role of Religious Networksand Other Factors in Types of Volunteer Work’, Nonprofit Management andLeadership, vol 14, no 3, pp. 263–289.

212 Bibliography

Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart (1986), ‘The Costs and Benefits of Own-ership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy,vol 94, no 4, pp. 691–719.

Hackett, Conrad: Wuthnow, Robert, Conrad Hackett and Becky Yang Hsu (2004).Hackman, J.R. (1987), ‘The Design of Work Teams’, in Lorsch, J.W. (ed.), Handbook

of Organizational Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 315–342.Hackworth, J. (2010), ‘Faith, Welfare, and the City: The Mobilization of Religious

Organizations for Neoliberal Ends’, Urban Geography, vol 31, no 6, pp. 750–773.Hall, Leda McIntyre (1992), ‘A Commission to Change: The United Methodist

Church in Detroit, Michigan, 1950–1980’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quar-terly, vol 21, no 1, pp. 39–49.

Hammond, Phillip E.: see Demerath III, N.J. and Phillip E. Hammond (1969).Hammond, Phillip E. (2000), The Dynamics of Religious Organisations: The

Extravasation of the Sacred and Other Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hammonds-Smith, Maxine and Dottie Malone-Atkins (2001), ‘Volunteers and

the 3C Model (Campus, Church, Community)’, Voluntary Action, vol 3, no 2,pp. 47–56.

Hare, R.M. (1981), Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, Oxford: ClarendonPress.

Harris, Margaret (1995a), ‘Quiet Care: Welfare Work and Religious Congrega-tions’, Journal of Social Policy, vol 24, no 1, pp. 53–71.

Harris, Margaret (1995b), ‘The Organization of Religious Congregations: Tacklingthe Issues’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 5, no 3, pp. 261–274.

Harris, Margaret (1996), ‘ “An Inner Group of Willing People”: Volunteering in aReligious Context’, Social Policy and Administration, vol 30, no 1, pp. 54–68.

Harris, Margaret (1998), Organizing God’s Work: Challenges for Churches andSynagogues, London: Macmillan.

Harris, Margaret (2005), ‘Organizational Studies Strand – Power’, in Cameron,Helen, Richter, Philip, Davies, Douglas and Ward, Frances (eds), Studying LocalChurches: A Handbook, London: SCM Press, pp. 209–221.

Harris, Margaret (2010), ‘Third Sector Organizations in a Contradictory PolicyEnvironment’, in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sec-tor: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,pp. 25–45.

Harris, Margaret (2012), ‘Seeing Churches as Voluntary Associations: Cate-gory Error or Insight for Practice?’, in Niemelä, Kati (ed.), Church Work andManagement in Change, Finland: Church Research Institute, pp. 27–42.

Harris, Margaret and Colin Rochester (eds) (2001), Voluntary Organisations andSocial Policy in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Harris, Margaret and Malcolm Torry (2000), Managing Religious and Faith-basedOrganisations: A Guide to the Literature, Birmingham: University of AstonBusiness School.

Harris, Margaret and Patricia Young (2010), ‘Building Bridges: The Third Sec-tor Responding Locally to Diversity’, Voluntary Sector Review, vol 1, no 1,pp. 41–58.

Harris, Margaret, Peter Halfpenny and Colin Rochester (2003), ‘A Social PolicyRole for Faith-based Organisations? Lessons from the UK Jewish VoluntarySector’, Journal of Social Policy, vol 32, no 1, pp. 93–112.

Hart, Oliver D.: see Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart (1986).

Bibliography 213

Hartman, Laura Pincus: see Trevino, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman andMichael Brown (2000).

Herman, Nancy J. (1984), ‘Conflict in the Church: A Social Network Analysis ofan Anglican Congregation’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 23,no 1, pp. 60–74.

Herman, Robert D.: see Butler, D. Martin and Robert D. Herman (1999).Heskins, Jeffrey (2001), Unheard Voices, London: Darton, Longman and Todd.Higgins, Lynn M.: see Chaves, Mark and Lynn M. Higgins (1992).Hills, Al-Haqq: see Farnell, Richard, Robert Furbey, Stephen Shams, Al-Haqq Hills,

Marie Macey and Greg Smith (2003).Hinings, C.R. (1979), ‘Continuities in the Study of Organizations: Churches and

Local Government’, in Lammers, C.J. and Hickson, D.J. (eds), OrganizationsAlike and Unlike: International and Interinstitutional Studies in the Sociology ofOrganizations, London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 137–48.

Hoegeman, Catherine: see Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez,Catherine Hoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008).

Hofstede, Geert (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills: Sage.

Home Office (2004), Home Office Citizenship Survey, 2003: People, Families andCommunities, Home Office Research Study 289, London: Home Office.

Hong, Young Joon (2012), ‘Best Practices in Managing Faith-based OrganizationsThrough Charitable Choice and Faith-Based Initiatives’, Journal of Social ServiceResearch, vol 38, no 2, pp. 130–143.

Hopewell, James F. (1987), Congregation: Stories and Structures, London: SCM PressHoward, Joanna and Marily Taylor (2010), ‘Hybridity in Partnership Working:

Managing Tensions and Opportunities’, in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organiza-tions and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–196.

Howard, Sue and David Welbourn (2004), The Spirit at Work Phenomenon, London:Azure.

Hsu, Becky Yang: see Wuthnow, Robert, Conrad Hackett and Becky Yang Hsu(2004).

Huang, Xu and Evert Van de Vliert (2003), ‘Where Intrinsic Job Satisfaction Failsto Work: National Moderators of Intrinsic Motivation’, Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, vol 24, no 2, pp. 159–179.

Huczynski, Andrezej A. and David A. Buchanan (2007), Organizational Behaviour,6th edition, Harlow: Pearson Education.

Hutchison, Romayne and Ben Cairns (2010), ‘Community Anchor Organizations:Sustainability and Independence’, in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizationsand the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 134–152.

Hyun, Joon Kim: See Amirkhanyan, Anna, Joon Kim Hyun and KristinaLambright (2009).

Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1988), ‘A Formal Model of Church and Sect’, AmericanJournal of Sociology, vol 94, pp. 241–268.

Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1994), ‘Why Strict Churches Are Strong’, AmericanJournal of Sociology, vol 99, no 5, pp. 1180–1211.

Industrial Democracy in Europe, by an international research group, ClarendonPress, 1981.

214 Bibliography

Ibrahim, Nabil: See Fritz, David and Nabil Ibrahim (2010).Ivereigh, Austen (2009), ‘Faith, Community Organizing and Migration – The

Case of “Regularization” ’, Public Money and Management, vol 29, no 6,pp. 351–354.

Jackson, Elton F., Mark D. Bachmeier, James R. Wood and Elizabeth A. Craft(1995), ‘Volunteering and Charitable Giving: Do Religious and AssociationalTies Promote Helping Behavior’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 24,no 1, pp. 59–78.

Jackson, John and Ray Jobling (1968), ‘Towards an Analysis of ContemporaryCults’, in Martin, David (ed.), A Sociological Yearbook of Religion, vol.I, London:Student Christian Movement, pp. 94–105.

Jackson, Robert: see Dinham, Adam and Robert Jackson (2012).Jawad, Rana (2012), Religion and Faith-based Welfare: From Wellbeing to Ways of

Being, Bristol: Policy Press.Jeavons, Thomas H. (1992), ‘When the Management is the Message: Relat-

ing Values to Management Practices in Nonprofit Organizations’, NonprofitManagement and Leadership, vol 2, no 4, pp. 403–417.

Jeavons, Thomas H. (1994a), When the Bottom Line is Faithfulness, Bloomingtonand Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Jeavons, Thomas H. (1994b), ‘Stewardship Revisited: Secular and Sacred Views ofGovernance and Management’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 23,no 2, pp. 107–122.

Jeavons, Thomas H. (2000), ‘Understanding Congregations as Voluntary Organ-isations: New Insights for the Nonprofit Sector’, Nonprofit Management andLeadership, vol 10, no 4, p. 457: A review of Ammerman, Nancy Tatom (1997),Congregation and Community, New Brunswick, J.J.: Rutgers University Press, andof Harris, Margaret (1998), Organizing God’s Work: Challenges for Churches andSynagogues, New York: St Martin’s Press and London: MacMillan.

Jeavons, Thomas H. (2004), ‘Religious and Faith-based Organizations: Do weKnow One when we See One?’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 33,pp. 140–145.

Jeong, Hoi Ok (2010), ‘How do Religions Differ in their Impact on Individ-uals’ Social Capital?’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 39, no 1,pp. 142–160.

Jobling, Ray: see Jackson, John and Ray Jobling (1968).Johnsen, Sarah (2012), ‘The Role of Faith-based Organizations in Service Pro-

vision for Homeless’, AHRC/ESRC Religion and Society Research Programme,www.religionandsociety.org.uk/publications/podcasts/show/sarah_johnsen_case_study_6_the_role_of_faith_based_organizations_in_service_provision_for_homeles.

Johnson, D.: see Tamney, Joseph B. and D. Johnson (1990).Jones, Philip (2012), ‘Ecclesiastical Law: Comments on English Ecclesiastical

Law and Related Subjects’, http://ecclesiasticallaw.wordpress.com/tag/long-v-bishop-of-cape-town-1863/.

Jones, Robert K. (1972), ‘The Catholic Apostolic Church: A Study in DiffusedCommitment’, in Hill, Michael (ed.), A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain,vol.V, London: Student Christian Movement, pp. 137–160.

Kavagy, Conrad L. (1992), ‘Social Action, Evangelism, and Ecumenism: TheImpact of Community, Theological and Structural Variables’, Review of ReligiousResearch, vol 34, no 1, pp. 34–50.

Bibliography 215

Kearns, Kevin, Chisung Park and Linda Yankoski (2005), ‘Comparing Faith-basedand Secular Community Service Corporations in Pittsburgh and AlleghenyCounty, Pennsylvania’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 34, no 2,pp. 206–231.

Kemper, Robert V.: see Adkins, Julie and Robert V. Kemper (2006).Kinney, Nancy T. and Mary L. Carver (2007), ‘Urban Congregations as Incubators

of Service Organizations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 18, no 2,pp. 193–214.

Klenowski, Paul M.: see Dodson, Kimberly D., Liann N. Cabage and PaulM. Klenowski (2011).

Kniss, Fed and Mark Chaves (1995), ‘Analyzing Interdenominational Conflict:New Directions’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 34, no 2,pp. 172–185.

Knoke, David (1990), Organizing for Political Action: The Political Economies ofAssociations, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Labanow, Cory E. (2009), Evangelicalism and the Emerging Church: A CongregationalStudy of a Vineyard Church, Farnham: Ashgate.

La Barbera, Priscilla A. (1991), ‘Commercial Ventures of Religious Organizations’,Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 1, no 3, pp. 217–134.

Lambright, Kristina: see Amirkhanyan, Anna, Joon Kim Hyun and KristinaLambright (2009).

Langan, Mary: see Fink, Janet, Anisa de Jong and Mary Langan (2011).Laughlin, Richard C. (1990), ‘A Model of Financial Accountability and the

Church of England’, Financial Accountability and Management, vol 6, no 2,pp. 93–114.

Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment:Managing Differentiation and Integration, Boston: Harvard University Press.

Leis-Peters, Annette (2010), ‘The German Dilemma: Protestant Agents of Wel-fare in Reutlingen’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare andReligion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections, Farnham:Ashgate, pp. 95–112.

Lé Mon, Martha Middlemiss (2010), ‘The “In-Between” Church: Church and Wel-fare in Darlington’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare andReligion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections, Farnham:Ashgate, pp. 113–128.

Leonard, Rosemary and John Bellamy (2010), ‘The Relationship Between Bondingand Bridging Social Capital among Christian Denominations Across Australia’,Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 20, no 4, pp. 445–460.

Lewin, Kurt (1947), ‘Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concepts, Method, and Realityin Social Science’, Human Relations, vol 1, no 1, pp. 5–41.

Lewins, Frank (1977), ‘Continuity and Change in a Religious Organization: SomeAspects of the Australian Catholic Church’, Journal for the Scientific Study ofReligion, vol 16, no 4, pp. 371–382.

Lewis, David (2010), ‘Encountering Hybridity: Lessons from Individual Experi-ences’, in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challengesfor Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219–239.

Lewis, James W.: see Wind, James P. and James W. Lewis (eds) (1994).Lewisham Borough Council (2007), Faith in Lewisham: A Review and Evaluation of

Partnership Work between the LB of Lewisham and Local Faith Groups, Lewisham:Lewisham Borough Council [available on www.docstoc.com].

216 Bibliography

Littlefield, Marci B. (2010), ‘Social Services, Faith-based Organizations, and thePoor’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 39, no 6, pp. 1014–1026.

Locke, Edwin (1975), ‘Personnel Attitudes and Motivation’, Annual Review ofPsychology, vol 26, pp. 457–480.

Locke, Michael: see Lukka, Priya and Michael Locke (2000).Lofland, John and James T. Richardson (1984), ‘Religious Movement Organiza-

tions: Elemental Forms and Dynamics’, Research in Social Movement Conflictsand Change, vol 7, pp. 29–51.

London Churches Group for Social Action (2013), Better Off Without Them? Reportof a Pilot Study into the Proportion of Voluntary Sector Welfare Projects Organized byChurches and Other Faiths, London: London Churches Group for Social Action.

Lorsch, Jay W.: see Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch (1967).Lowndes, Vivian: see Chapman, Rachael and Vivian Lowndes (2009).Lukes, Steven (ed.) (2005), Power, Oxford: Blackewell.Lukka, Priya, and Michael Locke (2000), ‘Faith, Voluntary Action and Social

Policy: A Review of Research’, Voluntary Action, vol 3, no 1, pp. 25–42.Lurkings, E.H. (1972), ‘Types of Christian Organization’, in Mitton, C.L. (ed.), The

Social Sciences and the Churches, Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, pp. 221–232.Malone-Atkins, Dottie: see Hammonds-Smith, Maxine and Dottie Malone-Atkins

(2001).Mao, W. and C. Zech (2002), ‘Choices of Organizational Structures in Religious

Organizations: A Game Theoretic Approach’, Journal of Economic Behavior andOrganization, vol 47, no 1, pp. 55–70.

March, James (1962), ‘The Business Firm as a Political Coalition’, The Journal ofPolitics, vol 24, no 4, pp. 662–678.

Mares, Alvin S. (1994), ‘Housing and the Church’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 23, no 2, pp. 139–157.

Martin, David (1972), ‘Church, Denomination and Society’, in Hill, Michael (ed.),A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, vol.V, London: Student ChristianMovement, pp. 184–191.

Martin, David (1978), A General Theory of Secularization, Oxford: Blackwell.Martin, David (1997), Reflections on Sociology and Theology, Oxford: Clarendon

Press, Oxford.Martinez, Jessica Hamar: see Anderson, Shawnal, Jessica Hamar Martinez,

Catherine Hoegeman, Gary Adler and Mark Chaves (2008).Mayo, Elton (1949), The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, London:

Routledge and Kegan Paul.Mayo, Elton (1960), The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, New York:

The Viking Press.Mayo, Ed and Agnes Nairn (2009), Consumer Kids: How Big Business is Grooming

our Children for Profit, London: Constable.McCann, Joseph F. (1993), Church and Organization: A Sociological and Theological

Enquiry, Scranton: University of Scranton Press.McKenzie, Brian D. (2001), ‘Self-selection, Church Attendance, and Local

Civic Participation’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 40, no 3,pp. 479–488.

McNamee, Lacy G. (2011), ‘Faith-based Organizational Communication and itsImplications for Member Identity’, Journal of Applied Communication Research,vol 39, no 4, pp. 422–440.

Bibliography 217

McSweeney, Brendan (2002), ‘Hofstede’s Model of National Culture Differencesand their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith – A Failure of Analysis’, HumanRelations, vol 55, no 1, pp. 89–118.

Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1991), ‘Institutionalized Organizations: FormalStructures as Myth and Ceremony’, in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul(eds), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago: University ofChicago Press, pp. 41–62.

Mill, John Stuart, and Jeremy Bentham (ed Alan Ryan) (1987), Utilitarianism andOther Essays, London: Penguin.

Miller, Kent D. (2002), ‘Competitive Strategies of Religious Organizations’, Strate-gic Management Journal, vol 23, no 5, pp. 435–456.

Mintzberg, Henry (1983a), Power In and Around Organizations, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mintzberg, Henry (1983b), Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mintzberg, Henry (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside our Strange Model ofOrganizations, New York: The Free Press.

Mitton, C.L. (ed.) (1972), The Social Sciences and the Churches, Edinburgh: T. andT. Clark.

Moberg, David O. (1970), ‘Theological Position and Institutional Characteristicsof Protestant Congregations: An Exploratory Study’, Journal for the ScientificStudy of Religion, vol 9, no 1, pp. 53–58.

Modood, Tariq (1998), ‘Anti-essentialism, Multiculturalism, and the “Recog-nition” of Religious Groups’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol 6, no 4,pp. 378–399.

Modood, Tariq (2010), ‘Moderate Secularism, Religion as Identity and Respect forReligion’, Political Quarterly, vol 81, no 1, pp. 4–14.

Moher, Lawrence B. (1982), Explaining Organizational Behavior, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Monahan, Susanne C. (1999), ‘Who Controls Church Work? OrganizationalEffects on Jurisdictional Boundaries and Disputes in Churches’, Journal for theScientific Study of Religion, vol 38, no 3, pp. 370–385.

Moreno, J.L. (1953), Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychother-apy and Sociodrama, Beacon, New York: Beacon House Inc.

Morgan, Gareth (2009a), ‘Churches and Charity Regulation: 1993–2009’, PublicMoney and Management, vol 29, no 6, pp. 355–362.

Morgan, Gareth (2009b), ‘Churches and Charity Accounting’, Public Money andManagement, vol 29, no 6, pp. 343–346.

Moscovici, Serge (1980), ‘Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior’, in Berkowitz,Leonard (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 13, New York:Academic Press, pp. 209–239.

Mullins, Laurie J. (2005), Management and Organisational Behaviour, 7th edition,Harlow: Pearson.

Mullins, David and Hal Pawson (2010), ‘Housing Associations: Agents of Policy orProfits in Disguise?’ in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sec-tor: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,pp. 197–218.

Munusamy, Vijayan P.: see Yip, Jeffrey, Edmund Twohill, Chris Ernst and VijayanP. Munusamy (2010).

218 Bibliography

Nairn, Agnes: see Mayo, Ed and Agnes Nairn (2009).Nauss, Allen (1972), ‘Problems in Measuring Ministerial Effectiveness’, Journal for

the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 11, no 2, pp. 141–151.Nauss, Allen (1974), ‘The Relation of Pastoral Mobility to Effectiveness’, Review of

Religious Research, vol 15, no 2, pp. 80–86.Nelson, Sheila: see Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. and Sheila Nelson (1998).Netting, F. Ellen (1984), ‘Church-related Agencies and Social Welfare’, Social

Service Review, vol 58, no 3, pp. 404–420.Netting, F.E. (2004), ‘Commentary on Typology of Religious Characteris-

tics of Social Service and Educational Organizations and Programs’ (Siderand Unruh, 2004), Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 33, no 1,pp. 135–139.

Niebuhr, H. Richard (1929), The Social Sources of Denominationalism, Gloucester,Mass.: Peter Smith, 1987, first published in 1929.

Nitterhouse, Denise (1997), ‘Financial Management and Accountability in Small,Religiously Affiliated Nonprofit Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 26, pp. 101–121.

Noble, D.F. (1986), Forces of Production, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ockenden, Nick: see Paine, Angela Ellis, Nick Ockenden and Joanna Stuart (2010).O’Dea, Thomas F. (1961), ‘Five Dilemmas in the Institutionalization of Religion’,

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 1, no 1, pp. 30–41.O’Neill, Brenda (2009), ‘Religion, Political Participation and Civic Engagement:

Women’s Experiences’, in Dinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert and Lowndes, Vivien(eds), Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies and Practices, Bristol: PolicyPress, pp. 123–142.

Owens, Michael Leo and R. Drew Smith (2005), ‘Congregations in Low-IncomeNeighborhoods and the Implications for Social Welfare Policy Research’,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 34, no 3, pp. 316–333.

Paine, Angela Ellis, Nick Ockenden and Joanna Stuart (2010), ‘Volunteers inHybrid Organizations: A Marginalized Majority?’ in Billis, David (ed.), HybridOrganizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy,Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 93–113.

Palmu, Harri: see Ropo, Arja and Harri Palmu (2012).Park, Chisung: see Kearns, Kevin, Chisung Park and Linda Yankoski (2005).Park, Jerry Z. and Christian Smith (2000), ‘ “To Whom Much has been Given . . . ”:

Religious Capital and Community Voluntarism among Churchgoing Protes-tants’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 39, no 3, pp. 272–286.

Paton, Rob, Haider Ali and Lee Taylor (2009), ‘Government Support for Faith-based Organizations: The Case of a Development Programme for Faith Leaders’,Public Money and Management, vol 29, no 6, pp. 363–370.

Paulhus, Elizabeth: see Davis, Francis, Elizabeth Paulhus and Andrew Bradstock(2008).

Pawson, Hal: see Mullins, David and Hal Pawson (2010).Pearson, Gordon (2009), The Rise and Fall of Management: A Brief History of Practice,

Theory and Context, Farnham: Gower.Pessi, Anne Birgitta (2010), ‘The Church as a Place of Encounter: Communality

and the Good life in Finland’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds),Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections,Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 77–94.

Bibliography 219

Pettersson, Per (2011), ‘Majority Churches as Agents of European Welfare: A Soci-ological Approach’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Welfare andReligion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 2: Gendered, Religious and Social Change,Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 15–59.

Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1981), Power in Organizations, Marshfield, Mass: PitmanPublishing.

Pipes, Paula F.: see Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Paula F. Pipes, Janet Saltzman Chafetzand Martha Daniels (2003).

Powell, W.: see DiMaggio, Paul and W. Powell (1983).Powell, W.: see DiMaggio, Paul and W. Powell (1991).Powell, Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio (1991), The New Institutionalism in

Organizational Analysis, 2nd edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Putnam, Robert (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy,

Princeton University Press.Putnam, Robert (1995), ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’,

Journal of Democracy, vol 6, pp. 65–78.Richardson, James T.: see Lofland, John and James T. Richardson (1984).Riordan, Patrick (2008), ‘At a Loss for Words’, in Riordan, Patrick (ed) Words

in Action: Finding the Right Words, The Institute Series: 11, London: HeythropInstitute for Religion, Ethics and Public Life, pp. 31–42.

Ritzer, George (2000), The McDonaldization of Society, Thousand Oaks, California:Pine Forge Press: first published in 1993.

Ritzer, G. (2010), McDonaldization: The Reader, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks,California: Pine Forge Press.

Rochester, Colin (2013), Rediscovering Voluntary Action: The Beat of a DifferentDrum, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rochester, Colin and Malcolm Torry (2010), ‘Faith-based Organizations andHybridity: A Special Case?’ in Billis, David (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and theThird Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan, pp. 114–133.

Rowan, Brian: see Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1991).Sacks, Jonathan (1997), The Politics of Hope, London: Jonathan Cape.Sager, Rebecca and Laura Susan Stephens (2005), ‘Serving up Sermons: Clients’

Reactions to Religious Elements at Congregation-run Feeding Establishments’,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 34, no 3, pp. 297–315.

Saliba, John A. (1995), Perspectives on New Religious Movements, London: GeoffreyChapman.

Sandberg, Russell (2011), Law and Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Santamaria, Jason: see Katzenbach, Jon and Jason Santamaria (1999).Saunders, George: see Tamney, Joseph B., Stephen D. Johnson, Kevin McElmurry

and George Saunders (2003).Scalf, John H., Michael J. Miller and Charles W. Thomas (1973), ‘Goal Specificity,

Organizational Structure and Participant Commitment in Churches’, Sociologi-cal Analysis, vol 34, no 3, pp. 169–184.

Schein, Edgar H. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Scheitle, Christopher P. (2010), Beyond the Congregation: The World of ChristianNonprofits, New York: Oxford University Press.

220 Bibliography

Schneider, Jo Anne (1999), ‘Trusting that of God in Everyone: Three Examplesof Quaker-based Social Service in Disadvantaged Communities’, Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 28, pp. 269–294.

Schreuder, Hein: see Douma, Sytse and Hein Schreuder (2008).Schwadel, Philip (2005), ‘Individual, Congregational, and Denominational

Effects on Church Members’ Civic Participation’, Journal for the Scientific Studyof Religion, vol 44, no 2, pp. 159–171.

Scott, W. Richard and Søren Christensen (1995), The Institutional Construction ofOrganisations, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Shaw, Martha: see Dinham, Adam and Martha Shaw (2012).Sherkat, Darren E. (2001), ‘Investigating the Sect-Church-Sect Cycle: Cohoert-

specific Attendance Differences across African-American Denominations’, Jour-nal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 40, no 2, pp. 221–233.

Sherman, J.D. and H.L. Smith (1984), ‘The Influence of Organizational Struc-ture on Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation’, Academy of Management Journal,vol 27, no 4, pp. 877–885.

Sherwin, Douglas S. (1983), ‘The Ethical Roots of the Business System’, HarvardBusiness Review, vol 61, no 6, pp. 183–192.

Sider, Ronald J. and Heidi Rolland Unruh (2004), ‘Typology of Religious Char-acteristics of Social Service and Educational Organizations and Programs’,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 33, no 1, pp. 109–134.

Sinha, Jill Witmer (2013), ‘Unintended Consequence of the Faith-Based Initiative:Organizational Practices and Religious Identity Within Faith-Based HumanService Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 42, no 3,pp. 563–583.

Skjørshammer, Morten: see Aadland, Einar and Morten Skjørshammer (2012).Skocpol, Theda (2003), Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in

American Civil Life, Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Smart, J.J.G and Bernard Williams (1973), Utilitarianism: For and Against,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Smith, Christian: see Park, Jerry Z. and Christian Smith (2000).Smith, David Horton (1983), ‘Churches are Generally Ignored in Contempo-

rary Voluntary Action Research: Causes and Consequences’, Review of ReligiousResearch, vol 24, no 4, pp. 295–303.

Smith, Greg: see Farnell, Richard, Robert Furbey, Stephen Shams, Al-Haqq Hills,Marie Macey and Greg Smith (2003).

Smith, H.L.: see Sherman, J.D. and H.L. Smith (1984).Smith, R. Drew: see Owens, Michael Leo and R. Drew Smith (2005).Snyder, Susanna (2011), ‘Un/settling Angels: Faith-Based Organizations and

Asylum-Seeking in the UK’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol 24, no 3, pp. 565–585.Stanley, Manfred (1962), ‘Church Adaptation to Urban Social Change: A Typol-

ogy of Protestant City Congregations’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,vol 2, no 1, pp. 64–73.

Stephens, Laura Susan: see Sager, Rebecca and Laura Susan Stephens (2005).Stone, Melissa M. and Miriam M. Wood (1997), ‘Governance and the Small,

Religiously Affilliated Social Service Provider’, Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly, vol 26, pp. 44–61.

Stopford, John, and Louis Wells Jr (1972), Managing the Multinational Enterprise:Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries, New York: BasicBooks Inc.

Bibliography 221

Stuart, Joanna: see Paine, Angela Ellis, Nick Ockenden and Joanna Stuart (2010).Sutton, John R.: see Chaves, Mark and John R. Sutton (2004).Swartz, David (1998), ‘Secularization, Religion, and Isomorphism: A Study of

Large Nonprofit Hospital Trustees’, in Demerath III, N.J., Hall, Peter Dobkin,Schmitt, Terry and Williams, Rhys H. (eds), Sacred Companies: OrganizationalAspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations, New York and Oxford:Oxford University Press, pp. 323–339.

Sykes, Stephen W. (1978), The Integrity of Anglicanism, Oxford: Mowbray.Szwajkowski, Eugene (2000), ‘Simplifying the Principles of Stakeholder Manage-

ment: The Three Most Important Principles’, Business and Society, vol 39, no 4,pp. 379–396.

Tamney, Joseph B. and D. Johnson (1990), ‘Religious Diversity and EcumenicalSocial Action’, Review of Religious Research, vol 32, no 1, pp. 16–26.

Tancred, Peter: see Mills, Albert J. and Peter Tancred (1979).Taylor, Lee: see Paton, Rob, Haider Ali and Lee Taylor (2009).Taylor, Marily: see Howard, Joanna and Marily Taylor (2010).Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.Thompson, Kenneth (1968), ‘Bureaucracy and the Church’, in Martin, David

(ed.), A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, vol I, London: StudentChristian Movement, pp. 32–46.

Thompson, Kenneth A. (1970), Bureaucracy and Church Reform: The Organiza-tional Response of the Church of England to Social Change, 1800–1965, Oxford:Clarendon Press.

Thompson, Kenneth A. (1973), ‘Religious Organizations: The Cultural Per-spective’, in Salaman, Graeme and Thompson, Kenneth (eds), People andOrganizations, London: Longman, pp. 293–302.

Thorley, Sarah: see Torry, Malcolm and Sarah Thorley (eds) (2008).Thung, Mady A. (1978), ‘An Alternative Model for a Missionary Church:

An Approach of the Sociology of Organizations’, The Ecumenical Review, vol 30,pp. 18–31, Geneva: World Council of Churches.

Todd, Andrew (ed.) (2013), Military Chaplaincy in Contention: Chaplains, Churchesand the Morality of Conflict, Farnham: Ashgate.

Tomer, John F. (1999), The Human Firm, London: Routledge.Torry, Malcolm (1990), ‘The Practice and Theology of the South London Indus-

trial Mission’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1990.Torry, Malcolm: see Harris, Margaret and Malcolm Torry (2000).Torry, Malcolm (ed.) (2004), The Parish: People, Places and Ministry: A Theological

and Practical Exploration, Norwich: Canterbury Press.Torry, Malcolm (2005), Managing God’s Business: Religious and Faith-Based Organi-

zations and their Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.Torry, Malcolm (ed.) (2006), Diverse Gifts: Varieties of Lay and Ordained Ministries

in the Church and Community, Norwich: Canterbury Press.Torry, Malcolm (ed.) (2007), Regeneration and Renewal: The Church in New and

Changing Communities, Norwich: Canterbury Press.Torry, Malcolm (2008), ‘Voluntary, Religious and Faith-based Organizations:

Some Important Distinctions’, Words in Action: Finding the Right Words, TheInstitute Series: 11, London: Heythrop Institute for Religion, Ethics and PublicLife, pp. 13–26.

Torry, Malcolm (2009), ‘On Building a New Christendom: Lessons from SouthLondon Parishes’, Theology, vol CXII, no 870, pp. 435–443.

222 Bibliography

Torry, Malcolm (2010), Bridgebuilders: Workplace Chaplaincy – A History, Norwich:Canterbury Press.

Torry, Malcolm: see Rochester, Colin and Malcolm Torry (2010).Torry, Malcolm (2012), ‘Is there a Faith Sector?’ Voluntary Sector Review, vol 3,

no 1, pp. 111–117.Torry, Malcolm and Jeffrey Heskins (eds) (2006), Ordained Local Ministry: A New

Shape for the Church’s Ministry, Norwich: Canterbury Press.Torry, Malcolm and Sarah Thorley (eds) (2008), Together and Different: Christians

Engaging with People of Other Faiths, Norwich: Canterbury Press.Trevino, Linda Klebe, Laura Pincus Hartman and Michael Brown (2000), ‘Moral

Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for EthicalLeadership’, California Management Review, vol 42, no 4, pp. 128–142.

Trice, Harrison M., and Janice M. Beyer (1993), The Cultures of Work Organizations,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Troeltsch, Ernst (1911), The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, vol.I,London: Allen and Unwin, 1931, first published 1911.

Tsitsos, William: see Chaves, Mark and William Tsitsos (2001).Tsouderos, J.E.: see Chapin, F.S. and J.E. Tsouderos (1956).Tuckman, Bruce Wayne (1965), ‘Developmental Sequence in Small Groups’,

Psychological Bulletin, vol 63, no 6, pp. 384–399.Turner, Bryan S. (1972), ‘The Sociological Explanation of Ecumenicalism’, in

Mitton, C.L. (ed.), The Social Sciences and the Churches, Edinburgh: T. andT. Clark, pp. 233–245.

Twohill, Edmund: see Yip, Jeffrey, Edmund Twohill, Chris Ernst and VijayanP. Munusamy (2010).

Unruh, Heidi Rolland: see Sider, Ronald J. and Heidi Rolland Unruh (2004).Valasik, Corinne (2010), ‘Church-State Relations in France in the Field of Welfare:

A Hidden Complementarity’, in Bäckström, Anders and Davie, Grace (eds), Wel-fare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1: Configuring the Connections,Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 129–145.

Valins, Oliver (2002), Facing the Future: The Provision of Long-term Care Facilitiesfor Older Jewish People in the United Kingdom, London: Institute for Jewish PolicyResearch.

van Billoen, Etienne (1973), ‘Le Modèle d’Authorité dans l’Eglise’, Social Compass,vol 20, no 3, pp. 405–417.

Van de Vliert, Evert: see Huang, Xu and Evert Van de Vliert (2003).Vanderwoerd, James R. (2004), ‘How Faith-based Social Service Organizations

Manage Secular Pressures Associated with Government Funding’, NonprofitManagement and Leadership, vol 14, no 3, pp. 239–262.

Wagner, Antonin (2008), ‘Religion and Civil Society: A Critical Reappraisal ofAmerica’s Civic Engagement Debate’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,vol 37, no 4, pp. 626–645.

Weller, Paul (2009), ‘How Participation Changes Things: “Inter-faith”, “Multi-faith” and a New Public Imaginary’, in Dinham, Adam, Furbey, Robert andLowndes, Vivien (eds), Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies andPractices, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 63–81.

Wells, Louis, Jr.: see Stopford, John and Louis Wells Jr (1972).Wiepking, Pamala: see Bekkers, René and Pamala Wiepking (2011).Williams, Bernard: see Smart, J.J.G and Bernard Williams (1973).

Bibliography 223

Willmott, Hugh: see Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott (1992).Wilson, Bryan R. (1959), ‘An Analysis of Sect Development’, American Sociological

Review, vol 24, no 1, pp. 3–15.Wilson, Bryan (1967) ‘The Pentecostalist Minister: Role Conflicts and Contra-

dictions of Status’, in Wilson, Bryan (ed.), Patterns of Sectarianism: Organi-zation and Ideology in Social and Religious Movements, London: Heinemann,pp. 138–57.

Wilson, John (1971), ‘The Sociology of Schism’, in Martin, David (ed.), A Sociolog-ical Yearbook of Religion in Britain, vol.IV, London: Student Christian Movement,pp. 1–20.

Wind, James P. and James W. Lewis (eds) (1994), American Congregations, Chicagoand London: University of Chicago Press.

Wineburg, Bob: Chaves, Mark and Bob Wineburg (2010).Wineburg, Robert J. (1992), ‘Local Human Service Provision by Religious Congre-

gations: A Community Analysis’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 21,no 2, pp. 107–118.

Wineburg, Robert J. (1993), ‘Social Policy, Community Service Development, andReligious Organizations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 3, no 3,pp. 283–297.

Wineburg, Robert J. (1994), ‘A Longitudinal Case Study of Religious Congrega-tions in Local Human Services’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 23,no 2, pp. 159–169.

Wineburg, Robert J.: see Cnaan, Ram A., Amy Kasternakis and Robert J. Wineburg(1993).

Wittberg, Patricia: see Finke, Roger and Patricia Wittberg (2000).Wolpert, Julian (1997), ‘The Role of Small Religious Nonprofits in Chang-

ing Urban Neighbourhoods’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 26,pp. 514–528.

Wood, James R. (1972a), ‘Unanticipated Consequences of Organizational Coali-tions: Ecumenical Co-operation and Civil Rights Policy’, Social Forces, vol 50,no 4, pp. 512–521.

Wood, James R. (1972b), ‘Personal Commitment and Organizational Restraint:Church Officials and Racial Integration’, Sociological Analysis, vol 33, no 3,pp. 142–451.

Wood, James R.: see Hougland, James G. and James R. Wood (1979).Wood, James R.: see Jackson, Elton F., Mark D. Bachmeier, James R. Wood and

Elizabeth A. Craft (1995).Wood, Miriam M.: see Stone, Melissa M. and Miriam M. Wood (1997).Woodward, Joan (1965), Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, London:

Oxford University Press.Wright, Beryl (1972), ‘The Sect that Became an Order: The Order of Ethiopia’, in

Hill, Michael (ed.), A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, vol.V, London:Student Christian Movement, pp. 60–71.

Wuthnow, Robert (1994), Producing the Sacred: An Essay on Public Religion, Urbanaand Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Wuthnow, Robert, Conrad Hackett and Becky Yang Hsu (2004), ‘The Effectivenessand Trustworthiness of Faith-based and Other Service Organizations: A Studyof Recipients’ Perceptions’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 43, no 1,pp. 1–17.

224 Bibliography

Wuthnow, Robert, Virginia A. Hodgkinson, et al. (1990), Faith and Philanthropy inAmerica: Exploring the Role of Religion in America’s Voluntary Sector, San Franciscoand Oxford: Jossey Bass.

Yaghi, Abdulfattah (2009), ‘Is Organizational Behavior in U.S. Muslim NonprofitInstitutions Religious?’ Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol 20, no 2,pp. 235–249.

Yankoski, Linda: see Kearns, Kevin, Chisung Park and Linda Yankoski (2005).Yeung, Anne B. (2004), ‘An Intricate Triangle: Religiosity, Volunteering, and

Social Capital: The European Perspective, The Case of Finland’, Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly, vol 33, no 3, pp. 401–422.

Yinger, J. Milton (1967), ‘Religion and Society: Problems of Integration andPluralism among the Privileged’, in Knudten, Richard D. (eds), The Sociologyof Religion, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 496–512.

Yip, Jeffrey, Edmund Twohill, Chris Ernst and Vijayan P. Munusamy (2010),‘Leadership in Faith-based Nonprofits’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership,vol 20, no 4, pp. 461–472.

Young, Patricia: see Harris, Margaret and Patricia Young (2010).Zech, C.: see Mao, W. and C. Zech (2002).Zygmunt, Joseph F. (1977), ‘Jehovah’s Witnesses in the USA 1942–1976’, Social

Compass, vol 24, no 1, pp. 45–47.

Index of Biblical Texts

Leviticus 19:18 139

2 Kings 5:1–19a 98

Isaiah 5:8–9 142Isaiah 61:1–4 143

Amos 2:6–7 142

Matthew 6:10 170Matthew 6:33 170Matthew 22:15–22 115Matthew 25:31–40 140Matthew 28:16–20

53, 73

Mark 3:13–19a 53Mark 6:6b-13 53Mark 7:24–30 171Mark 9:35 137Mark 12:28–31 139

Luke 4:14–30 144Luke 10:25–37 90Luke 14:11 137

John 1:1–17 67, 91John 4: 1–42 90John 6:38 137John 10:14–16 91John 13:13–15 138John 17 96John 17:10–11 90

Acts 2: 46–47 116Acts 5:12–16 53Acts 6:1–6 51–2, 140Acts 8:1–5 2,

114, 170Acts 9:1–30 2Acts 10:9–16 171Acts 11:19–21 170

Acts 11:27–30 3Acts 12:1–5 114Acts 13:1–5 170Acts 15:1–35 2, 89Acts 16:9–10 170Acts 17:1–15 186Acts 17:22–25 90Acts 17:30–32 90

Romans 13:1–7 117Romans 13:8–10 139Romans 15:25–29 3

1 Corinthians 9:4–14 41 Corinthians 11:23–26 138

2 Corinthians 5:18–19 672 Corinthians 8:1–7 32 Corinthians 9:1–5 3

Galatians 2:11–13 171Galatians 3:28

141, 170

Ephesians 6:7–9 141

Philippians 2:3–7 137Philippians 4:15–16 4

Colossians 3:22–25 141Colossians 4:12–18 4

1 Timothy 2:1–4 1161 Timothy 3:8–10 521 Timothy 5:3–14

52, 140

Philemon 141, 170

James 1:26–27 114

1 Peter 2:16–21 142

225

226 Index of Biblical Texts

1 John 2:15–17 1151 John 2:18–20 51 John 3:23–24 61 John 4:1–6 51 John 4:19–21 137

3 John 5–10 5

Revelation 21:1–4 172Revelation 22:1–2 172

Name Index

Note: NT denotes a New Testament name; CS denotes a case study name.

Aadland, F., 62Abell, P., 165Adkins, J., 59Adler, P., 74Agabus (NT), 2Aiken, M., 150Alchian, M., 157Ali, H., 64–5, 67, 122, 124–5Alvesson, M., 163Amirkhanyan, A., 64Ammerman, N.T., 120Anderson, S., 121Angell, O.V., 155Archippus (NT), 4Axelrod, R., 103

Bäckström, A., 112, 136, 151–2,156, 202

Badham, R., 40Baker, C., 121, 173Ballard, P., 80Barker, E., 20, 122Barnabas (NT), 3, 88–9, 170–1Barradell, Maggie, xvBecker, P.E., 154Beckford, J.A., 17, 19, 122, 154Bekkers, R., 144–5Bellamy, J., 120Benedict, rule of, 73Benson, J.K., 10, 64, 153Bentham, J., 159Berger, P.L., 10, 119Beyer, J.M., 126Bibby, R.W., 69Biebricher, T., 67Bielefeld, W, 56, 151Billis, D., 147, 150Bolden, D.A., 92–3Bomford, R., 21, 93Bradford, D.L., 40

Bradstock, A., 147Brierley, P., 189Brown, Malcolm, 80Brown, Michael, 162Bruce, S., 18Buchanan, C. xvBuchanan, D., 38, 40–1, 64, 77, 159,

162, 177, 197Buller, P.F., 179Burke, E., 119Burns, A., 22, 180Butler, D.M., 26Byrd, M., 62

Cabage, L.N., 61Cairns, B., 150Calley, M.J.C., 19Cameron, H.E., 57, 145, 155Campbell, D., 66, 120Caputo, R., 145Carabain, C.L., 145Carr-Gomm, Richard, 59–61Carver, M.L., 64Casanova, J., 19Cavan, R., 19Cephas (Peter) (NT), 171Chafetz, J.S., 65Chapin, F.S., 6, 20Chapman, R., 123–5Chaves, M., 12, 14, 58, 66, 92, 152Child, J., 35, 41Choe, J-H., 153–4Christensen, S., 163Clark, D.B., 93Claudius (NT), 3Cleveland, W.S., 56, 151Cnaan, R.A., 146Cohen, A.R., 40Cole Durham, W., 54Cormode, D.S., 60

227

228 Name Index

Daft, R.L., 100, 102, 160–2,175–8, 181

Davidson, J.D., 154Davie, G. ix, 112, 136, 151–2, 156, 202Davis, F., 65, 124, 147de Jong, A., 75de Tocqueville, A., 119Deakin, N., 122Dean, Hartley, xvDemerath III, N.J., 23, 60Demsetz, H., 157DiIulio, J.J., 146DiMaggio, P., 7, 21, 64, 94, 126, 146,

150, 158, 163, 181Dinham, A., 67, 122, 149, 202Diotrephes (NT), 4Dittes, J.E., 21Dodson, K.D., 61Dorsett, J.H., 10, 64, 153Douma, S., 158Drane, J., 198Dukes, Deborah, xvDulles, A., 129Duncan, R.B., 198Dunlap, K., 17Dyck, B., 73

Ebaugh, H.R., 58–9, 65Ecclestone, G.S., 112–13, 118Edgardh, N., 153Elijah (NT), 144Elisha (NT), 98, 144Elster, J., 158Engahl, R.L., 68Epaphras (NT), 4

Farnell, R., 100, 120, 146–8, 172, 174Farnsley, A.E., 147Fiedler, F.E., 178Fink, J., 75Finke, R., 77Finneron, D., 146–7Fischer, R.L., 67Flanigan, S.T., 63Forster, Roger and Faith (CS), 47–9Foucault, M., 40Fraser, Jeremy, xvFritz, D., 32

Gill, R., 18Göçmen, I. 56Goldman, M.S., 20Goodhead, Andrew (CS), 82–3Gorringe, T.J., 169Grønbjerg, K.A., 60Grossman, S.J., 157

Hackett, C., 148–9Hackworth, J., 152Hall, L.M., 154Hammond, P.E., 23, 117, 189Hammonds-Smith, M., 146Hare, R.M., 159Harris, M. xi, xiv, 105, 145, 147,

149–51, 154–5Hart, O.D., 157Hartman, L.P., 162Herman, N.J., 26, 62Herod (NT), 114–15Heskins, J., 154Higgins, L.M., 155Hinings, C., 10Hofstede, G., 174Hong, Y.J., 62Hopewell, J.F., 154Howard, J., 126Hsu, B.Y., 148–9Huang, X., 175Huczynski, A.A., 38, 40–1, 64, 77, 159,

162, 177, 197Hutchison, R., 150Hyun, J.K., 64

Iannaccone, L.R., 21Ibrahim, N., 32Isaiah (NT), 142–3Ivereigh, A., 65

Jackson, E.F., 145Jackson, J., 21Jackson, R., 149, 202James, apostle (NT), 114James, the brother of Jesus (NT), 171Jawad, R., 149–54, 174Jeavons, T.H., 55, 64, 69, 122Jeong, H.O. xi, 120Jesus Christ (NT) xii, 3–5, 47, 50, 52–3,

67, 72–3, 77, 80, 88–91, 96–8,

Name Index 229

108, 114–15, 136–43, 170–1,185–6, 190

Jobling, R., 21John, the apostle (NT), 114John, writer of the Gospel of John

(NT), 91John Paul, Pope, 77Johnsen, S., 58Johnson, D., 94, 100, 147Jones, R.K., 20Jones, P., 25Judas called Barsabbas (NT), 89

Kearns, K., 58Kemper, R.V., 59Kinney, N.T., 64Klenowski, P.M., 61Kniss, F., 92Knoke, D., 154

La Barbera, P.A., 66Labanow, C.E., 78Lambright, K., 64Langan, M., 75Laughlin, R.C., 16Lawrence, P.R., 200–1Lé Mon, M.M., 148, 151, 155, 202Leader, Mike (CS), 133Leis-Peters, A., 155Leonard, R., 120Lewin, K., 178Lewins, F., 44Lewis, J.W., 32Littlefield, M.C., 50Lloyd, Sarah, xivLocke, M., 145Lofland, J., 20London, Bishop of, 80Lorsch, J.W., 200–1Lowndes, V., 122–5, 149Luke (NT), 4, 143Lukes, S., 40Lukka, P., 145Lurkings, E.H., 21

Malone-Atkins, D., 146Mao, W., 31March, J., 41Mares, A.S., 145

Martin, D. ix, 22, 97, 145Mayo, E., 163McCann, J.F., 69McKenzie, B.D., 146McSweeney, B., 175Meyer, J.W., 6, 9Mill, J.S., 159Miller, K.D., 32Mintzberg, H., 42, 158Moberg, D.O., 18Modood, T., 119Moher, L.B., 176Monahan, S.C., 43Moreno, J.L., 39Morgan, G., 9, 54, 129Moscovici, S., 42Moses (NT), 88–9, 91Muhammad, 98Mullins, L.J., 13–14, 62, 175, 197Mullins, D., 59

Naaman (NT), 98, 144Nairn, A., 163Nash (equilibrium), 37Nauss, A., 26Nelson, S., 60Netting, F.E., 58, 60Newman, Liz, xvNiebuhr, H.R., 18, 22Nitterhouse, D., 68Noble, D.F., 78

O’Neill, B., 122Ockenden, N., 150Owens, M.L., 147

Paine, A.E., 150Park, J.Z., 58, 146Paton, R., 64–5, 67, 122, 124–5Paul (NT), 2–4, 6, 15, 88–91, 114, 116,

137–9, 141, 170–1, 185–6Paulhus, E., 147Pawson, H., 59Pearson, G., 197Pessi, A.B., 155–6Peter (NT), 88, 114, 171, 201Pettersson, P., 2, 140–1, 148–9,

151, 156Pfeffer, J., 39

230 Name Index

Philemon (NT), 141, 170Philip (NT), 51Pipes, P.F., 65Powell, W., 7, 21, 64, 94, 126, 146,

150, 158, 163, 181Putnam, R., 119, 173

Richardson, J.T., 20Rigby, Lee, 111, 134Riordan, P., 130Ritzer, G., 34, 198Roberts, Cllr Chris (CS), 166Robinson, Alan (CS), 166Rochester, C. xiv, 8, 58, 149, 151, 154Rowan, B., 6, 9

Sacks, J., 119Sager, R., 145Saliba, J.A., 20Sandberg, R., 53Saul (Paul) (NT), 3, 114, 170Saunders, Cicely (CS), 82, 84Scheitle, C.P., 54, 119Schneider, J.A., 119–20Schreuder, H., 158Schwadel, P., 122Scott, W.R., 163Shaw, M., 67Sherkat, D.E., 20Sherman, J.D., 62Sherwin, D.S., 160, 162Sider, R.J., 56–7, 61Silas (NT), 89, 185–6Simeon (Simon) (NT), 88Sinha, J.W., 60Skjørshammer, M., 62Skocpol, T., 119Smart, J.J.G., 159Smith, C., 146Smith, H.L., 62Smith, R.D., 147Snyder, S., 147, 155–6Southwark, Bishop of, xv, 12, 16, 97Stanley, M., 18Stephen (NT), 51, 114Stephens, L.S., 145Stone, M.M., 60Stopford, J., 36Stuart, J., 150

Sutton, J.R., 12Swartz, D., 60, 64Sweeney, James, xivSykes, S.W., 96Szwajkowski, E., 161

Tamney, J.B., 96, 100, 147Taylor, F., 26Taylor, L., 64–5, 67, 122, 125Taylor, M., 126Thompson, K.A., 7, 10–12, 21, 97,

103, 198, 200Thorley, S., 98–100, 130Thung, M.A., 69Timothy (NT), 186Titus (NT), 3Todd, A., 85Trevino, L.K., 162Troeltsch, E., 18Tsitsos, W., 58Tsouderos, J.E., 6, 20Tuckman, B.W., 123Turner, B.S., 95

Unruh, H.R., 56–7, 61

Valasik, C., 155Valins, O., 69van Billoen, E., 15Van de Vliert, E., 175

Wagner, A., 121Weber, M., 11, 20, 30, 48Weller, P., 123Wells, L., 36Wiepking, P., 144Williams, B., 159Willmott, H., 163Wilson, B.R., 20, 32Wilson, J., 20Wilson, Susie, 108Wind, J.P., 32Wineburg, R.J., 66, 146, 154Wittberg, P., 77Wolpert, J., 68Wood, J.R., 93, 153Wood, M.M., 60Woodhouse, Bart (CS), 183Woodward, J., 200

Name Index 231

Wright, B., 20Wuthnow, R., 120, 148–9, 151

Yaghi, A., 63Yankoski, L., 58Yeung, A.B., 145

Yinger, J.M., 94Yip, J., 63Young, P., 105

Zech, C., 31Zygmunt, J.F., 19

Subject Index

accountability, 8, 13, 16, 24–9, 35, 68,124, 174

multidirectional, 24–5, 27, 192mutual, 4, 27, 191network, 15, 24, 28–9, 33, 85,

188, 192accounts, financial. see financial

accountingacquisition of company, 101–2action research, 179adoption agency. see agency, adoptionadvice centre, 50, 148, 155Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration

Service, 95advocacy, 58, 65, 121, 162affective activity, 56, 94Africa, 175African-American, 12, 50agency, 2, 59, 65, 154, 166

activity, 94adoption, 75development. see development

agencymission. see mission organization

agentchange, 26social, 152sales, 101see also principal/agent theory

aim, 44, 48, 66, 94, 176, 187see also organizational aim

Alpha Course, 77altruism, 127, 156ambiguity, 9–11, 17, 23, 39, 71, 83, 98,

114–15, 177, 191ambiguous sphere/zone, 54–5, 126Amish, 19–20Anglican Communion, 33–4, 36,

70, 76bureaucratization of, 34

annual report, 128, 195anointing of the sick, 53, 83

apostle, 51–3, 73, 80, 88–9, 114,140, 201

appointment, 10, 12, 14, 17, 29–32,43, 51–2, 76, 82–3, 88, 90, 105–6,116, 122–5, 131–3, 140, 181

criteria, 58–9appraisal, mutual, 13, 27–8arbitration, 2, 95Archbishop of Canterbury, 11, 131archdeacon, 10, 22, 30, 39, 46, 60area dean, 10, 39armed forces, 85Ascension Trust, 155aspiration. see discourse, aspirationalassociation, 17, 49, 52, 76, 95, 105–6,

119, 124, 155, 192, 199housing. see housing associationresidents’. see residents’ association

asylum rights, 147attendance at congregation, 19, 21,

26, 183, 189authoritative mediation. see

mediation, authoritativeauthority/-ies, 40, 68, 178

biblical. see Bible, authority ofbureaucratic, 15, 29, 38charismatic, 28, 68civic, 94, 112, 123, 125, 132–5,

150–1, 174, 185. see alsoauthority/-ies, secular

contestable, 36denominational/diocesan, 2, 9–10,

12–16, 25–9, 33–4, 42–4, 46,75–6, 80, 92–3, 95, 97, 103–4,113, 130, 147, 179–80

distributed, 62education, 61employing, 31figure, 84–5institutional. see institutions,

authority ofinternational, 17

232

Subject Index 233

Jewish. see Jewish authoritieslocal, 7, 17, 75, 118, 131, 163–4,

168, 172, 181mediated, 191network of, 24, 28of apostles, 52of bishop. see bishop, authority ofof congregation member. see

member, authority ofof constitution, 193of culture, 191of God, 190of Jesus, 53of minister. see minister, authority

of; clergy, authority ofof religious institutions, 202planning, 7primary, 13, 19, 25, 44, 49, 76public, 58–9, 161regulatory, 7, 160, 176ruling, 116–17secular, 23, 59, 112–13, 115–16,

130, 152, 174. see alsoauthority/-ies, civic

subsidiary, 28, 92, 103,190–2

tax, 54traditional, 14–15, 25, 28, 33–4,

68, 191see also authority structure

authority structure, 201bureaucratic, 1, 14, 34, 68complex, 198democratic, 1external, x, 8–9, 13, 18, 25, 27, 33,

35–6, 39, 42, 45, 47, 107, 120,122, 128, 138, 153, 179, 188,190–3

hierarchical, 62, 104internal, x, 8, 25, 42–3, 104, 107national, 15position of, 201primary, x, 9, 25, 34, 36, 42, 45, 76,

103–4, 107, 130, 136, 138,165, 190

regional, 15, 123–4relativization of, 137–8, 165secondary, 36, 191

subsidiary, 14, 25, 42–3, 45, 128,138, 188, 190–1, 193

unitive, 33see also authority

automation, 78autonomy, 11, 17–18, 30–1, 34–5,

42–3, 47, 103, 153, 164, 175,188, 197

Baha’i, 111, 134bankruptcy, 161baptism, 53, 92Baptist Church, 31, 54, 92, 132bargaining, 37–8, 41, 100

surplus, 37Beacon Project, 182–3behaviour, organizational. see

organizational behaviourBenedictine order, 73benefice, 23, 129benefit, public. see public benefitbenefits, social security, xv, 80, 165–6bereavement counselling, 147Bible, 82, 104, 183

authority of, xii, 98, 190–1interpretation of, 19, 45study group, 26see also scripture

bible society, 199biblical texts, x, xii, xvi, xvii, 2–6, 45,

51–3, 87–91, 108, 113–17,136–44, 170–2, 185

Big Lunch, 183Billy Graham Evangelistic

Association, 199bishop, xviii, 1, 10, 12–14, 16, 24, 29,

31, 35, 44, 76–7, 97, 112, 118,133, 153, 201

accountability of, 13, 25appointment of, 29–30area, 30authority of, 1–15, 17, 24–5, 40bureaucratization of, 39, 46obedience to, 25secularization of, 15suffragan, 30

Bishop of London, 80Bishop of Southwark, xv, 97Bishop’s Mission Order, 14

234 Subject Index

black majority church. see church,black majority

board of directors/trustees, 35, 59, 60,63–4, 68, 96, 107, 109, 129, 150,161, 163, 166

bonus scheme, 73, 175Book of Common Prayer, 24, 201borough, churches of, 132–3, 136Borough Commander, 110, 132Borough Dean. see Ecumenical

Borough Deanboundary

around congregation, 93–4, 119–22,145, 191

between denominations, 87, 91between faiths, 87between governance and

activity, 107between sectors, 151clergy-laity, xviiclosed, 5–6, 19, 20–1, 91, 191crossing cultural, 174cultural, 174fuzzy, 9, 107open, 21–2, 174permeable, 18, 193spanner, 43, 119, 130, 151

bounded rationality, 176brand, 17, 100, 198bridge

between sectors, 130influence across, 6linguistic, 130organizational, 107religious-secular, 23, 69–70, 84system

Buddhism, 134, 175budget

faith-based, 68welfare. see welfare budget

buildingproject, 7, 82, 92religious, 50, 97, 99, 108–9, 112,

118, 126, 147, 149, 155, 166,174, 182

bureacracy, 2, 14, 22, 27, 93company, 179denominational. see

denominational bureaucracy

diocesan. see diocesan bureaucracygovernment, 118loose, 30, 39secular, 14see also denomination, as

bureaucracybureaucratic

authority structure. see authoritystructure, bureaucratic

behaviour, 22, 28, 46experience, 93–4links, 12management, 12, 76methods, 12, 34, 118model, 8organization, 7, 41structure. see structure, bureaucratic

bureaucratization, 34of congregation, 34, 46of denominational/diocesan

structures, 2, 7, 10–12, 15, 17,19, 33–4, 43, 96–7

of federation, 21of mission activity, 12of voluntary organizations, 8,

150, 199partial, 34see also Anglican Communion

business consultant, 101

café, 147canon law, 24–5, 193, 201canon residentiary, 30capital

financial, 126, 163human, 126intellectual, 197organizational, 127political, 121productive, 126religious, 121, 173social, 119–20, 126, 148, 151, 173,

202spiritual, 121, 173

careduty of, 161health. see health careholistic, 83immediate, 58

Subject Index 235

palliative, 82pastoral, xvii–xviii, 23–4, 71, 83quiet, 121, 145, 147, 152, 155, 174small-group, 122social, 172spiritual, 83–4

careerprofessional, 7, 29–33progression, 29–30prospects, 127structure. see structure, careersee also clergy, career

carers’ and toddlers’ group, 163–4,183–4

Caritas, 65carol service, 84, 183Carr-Gomm Society, 59–61cartel, 102–3, 157cathedral, 16, 30, 33Catholic Agency for Overseas

Development (CAFOD) 154centralization, 11–12, 17–18, 21, 36chain of command, 30, 37chair

of board, 35, 60, 107of church council, 25, 129of district (Methodist) 16, 46of meeting, 112of organization, 132–3, 184

challengesdefences against, 187facing companies, 103, 177facing voluntary organizations, 151,

186–8, 194–5facing faith-based organizations,

151, 185–6, 188–97facing religious organizations, ix,

xii, 67, 151, 185–6, 188–94,96–7

facing teams, 178Chamber of Commerce, 17change

agent. see agent, changechallenges, 196–7in communities. see new and

changing communitiesin company, 42, 100, 174–9, 197–8in denomination, 97

in faith-based organization, 59,66–9, 72, 75, 156

in religious organization, 26, 32, 44,67, 73, 119–20, 153–4, 156, 169,181, 189, 191, 198–9, 201–2

in voluntary organization, 150–1isomorphic. see isomorphismmanagement of, 19, 176, 179, 193process of, 178social, 154, 174, 196–7technological, 197unpredictable, 198see also conversion

chaos, 177–8chaplain

Christian, 85, 108, 111hospice, 81–5, 106hospital, 78, 84–5, 99–100, 106industrial. see chaplain, workplacemanagement of, 84–5, 110–11military, 85multi faith. see multi faith

chaplaincypolice, 110, 132prison, 78, 81–2, 85, 99–100,

106, 110university, 78, 84–5, 106workplace, xv, 71–3, 78, 80, 82,

84–6, 99–100, 106–7, 109–11charismatic

authority. see authority, charismaticleadership, 19–20, 48–9, 68,

177–8, 199renewal, 77

charitableactivity, 61company, 48giving, 128, 144, 195purpose. see purpose, charitablestatus, 128trust, xv, 47, 54, 70, 128–9, 155

charityexcepted, 53–4, 129faith-based, 7, 54independent, 54, 76law, 54mission organization as, 100public relationship with -s, 196

236 Subject Index

charity – continuedregistration/regulation, 8–9, 17,

53–4, 61, 128, 193religious, 17, 53, 193voluntary organization as, 54

Charity Commission, ix, 7–8, 54,128–9, 147

cheating, 102–3Chief Executive Officer, 35, 40, 107children

admission to communion, 44camps for, 72care for, 140, 155, 165of church member, 105, 145, 183protection/safeguarding, 12,

28–9, 134referral, 75

Children’s Church, 21China, 174–5Christian

action, 168Aid, 50, 121, 153–4, 167, 194–5as servant, 137chaplain. see chaplain, Christiancommunity, 133, 138, 169, 184denomination. see denominationdifferences, 108doctrine, 67, 91, 98early, 2, 47, 51, 70, 114equality of -s, 138experience, 55, 136Faith, 19, 23–5, 52, 59, 67, 82–5,

97, 146Gentile, 87, 89in politics, 174Jewish, 87, 89, 141language, 82liberal, 145minister, 125mission, 68, 71–2, 78organization. see organizations,

Christianprayer, 108–9religion, xi, 84, 169sacred text, xii, 82, 98, 171, 190services, 82–3, 96space, 82symbols, 82tradition, xvii, 61, 114, 152–4

trustees, 59, 111unity, 89, 91, 96. see also ecumenismvolunteering, 144–6worship, 82–3, 96–7, 169, 173, 181

Christmascarols, 84events, 19

church, xviiaffiliated, 48as charity, 54as national organization, 2as sociological category, 18–19,

21–3, 194attendance. see attendanceblack majority, 20, 132–3boundary around, 6building. see building, religiousclosure, 189council, 25–7, 164denominational. see denomination,

as sociological categoryearly -s, 3–6, 15, 116, 137emerging. see emerging churchepiscopal, 14evangelical, 1, 20, 78, 92, 118,

132–3, 190free, 20, 94–5, 118government. see governancegroup of –s, 174hierarchical, 17independent, xvii, 1, 118,

132–3, 190indigenous, 71innovation in. see innovationland, 60leader, 112, 133links between –s, 4member of. see membernew, 2, 48, 169, 173, 180parish. see parish churchparochial, 23pentecostal, 20, 22, 145persecuted, 114–17, 186reformed, 33school. see faith schoolsectarian, 93size of, 2state, 145survival of, 6, 188

Subject Index 237

-s working together, 14, 32, 96, 99,101, 155, 164, 166, 174

type of, 189see also Church; congregation

Church, xviias body of Christ, 129as federation of congregations, 30,

34, 46as holy, catholic, and apostolic, 24as mystical communion, 129as servant, 129authority structure. see authority

structureearly, xii, 52, 170, 189expansion of, 2unity of, 77, 89worship as main purpose, 53see also church

Church Army, 71Church Assembly, 11Church Commissioners, xv, 129Church in Wales, 46Church, Methodist. see Methodist

ChurchChurch, Orthodox. see Orthodox

ChurchChurch, Presbyterian. see Presbyterian

ChurchChurch, Roman Catholic. see Roman

Catholic ChurchChurch, United Reformed. see United

Reformed ChurhChurch Mission Society, 70, 72, 77, 79Church of England, ix, 1, 8, 10–12,

14–15, 17–19, 22–5, 31, 44, 46–7,54, 70, 77, 84, 94–7, 109, 111,117–18, 129, 132–3, 150, 153,168, 182, 184, 192–3, 201

establishment of, 8, 119Church of Scotland, 117Church Pastoral Aid Society, 72Church Representation Rules, 193Churches Together in England, 108churchwarden, 16, 125, 192churchyard, 26circuit (Methodist), 9, 17, 182–3circumcision, 171Citizen’s Income, 167city, 89, 171–2, 174, 185

civicauthorities. see authorities, civicengagement, 5, 125event, 105partnershipsociety. see society, civic

civil society. see society, civilclass

lower, 93middle, 22–3, 93social, see social classworking, 22, 93

clergyaccountability, 24–8, 46allocation of, 13, 15, 18ambiguous position of, 10appointment of, 17, 31, 43, 125appraisal of, 13as channel of communication,

10, 70as channel of control, 43as manager, 26as shepherd, 26authority of, 43bureaucratic, 10, 12, 22, 28career, 29–33. see also careerchaplains, 72, 84chapter, 84church, 22competitive, 103congregational, 28, 43–4, 46, 72,

174, 192declarations, 24–5denominational, xvii, 10, 12, 20,

22–4, 28, 32–3, 43, 45, 94full-time, 23, 29group of, 46, 95, 155, 192hierarchical, 10, 15isomorphism of, 94–5/laity divide, 94licensing of, 17, 24locally rooted, 153, 155management of, 28part-time, 29parochial, 10, 46pastoral demands on, 22professional, 7, 190restrictive practices, 97secularization, 188

238 Subject Index

clergy – continuedstipendiary, 29recruitment, 36relationships with denominational

authorities, 10–14representative, 125, 148traditional authority, 14–15training of, 17, 31–2, 39, 99unpaid, 29welfare function, 2working together, 32, 96, 103see also minister

closure of organization, 92, 187, 189,192–3

club mode, 22–3coaching, 179coercive compliance structure. see

compliance structure, coercivecollaboration, 2, 27, 65, 102, 105collusion, 157commerce, 17, 71committee, 39–40, 80, 132, 134, 166common good, 140communication, 133, 196

channel, 10, 179failure, 35, 146implicit, 61

communionadmission to, 44Anglican. see Anglican CommunionHoly. see Holy Communioninter-, 95–7

communityactivity, 182African-American, 50benefit, 183building, 182, 184-building, 173–4business, 16–17changing. see new and changing

communitiesChristian. see Christian communityconsultation, 174development, 184entire. see community, localethnic, 123faith. see faith communityglobal, ix

group, 112, 119, 122, 131,163–4, 184

institutional, 161local, 18, 22–3, 28, 61, 135, 150,

155, 159, 164, 172–4, 181,184, 193

missional, 70, 72national, 161new. see new and changing

communitiesorganization. see voluntary

organizationresidential, 180rural, 172school. see school, state/communitysector. see voluntary sectorsecular, 69, 180Sikh, 123sustainable, 182trust in, 119urban, 172wider. see community, localworker, 184

company. see firmcompassion, 61, 150competition, 100, 103, 199

theory, 100, 104–5complexity, ix, 11, 40, 58, 63, 74–5,

83, 103, 106–7, 133–4, 145, 147,151, 158, 165, 177–8, 198, 202

complianceof minority, 41reward for, 40

compliance structure, 15, 68coercive, 15, 34, 68normative, 15, 38, 68utilitarian, 15, 68

compromise, 11, 88, 95conflict, ix, 14, 36, 69, 74–5, 141, 160Confucian tradition, 175congregation, xvii, 1

activity of, 7, 21, 34, 94, 113, 147African American, 50as entrepreneur, 181as local branch, 16–17as organization, 17as prototypical religious

organization, 1, 30, 76attendance. see attendance

Subject Index 239

authority/authority structure. seeauthority; authority structure

autonomy of, 30–1, 43, 153boundary around. see boundary

around congregation, 94bureaucratization. see

bureaucratization, ofcongregation

change in, 154. see also changecharateristics of, 11, 138, 173charity registration of, 8–9, 54clergy of. see clergy; ministerclosure of, 92conservative, 153culture of, 45–7defensive, 5denominational, x, 1, 20, 22–3,

32–3, 43–5, 76–7, 93, 104, 113,132, 192–3

diversity of, 18, 92embedded, 155federation of, 1, 2, 9, 11, 18, 20–21,

33, 46–8, 71, 81finances/funding of, 7, 15–16, 71,

129, 147, 174, 187–8governance of. see governancegroups in. see groupgrowth of, 44ideology of, 46–7independent, 4, 29, 94, 192–3informal, 1innovation in. see innovationisomorphism in. see isomorphismJewish, xivleader. see leaderlongevity of, 121management of, xiv, xv, 12–13, 19member of. see membermerger of, 92mortality rate, 121norms of, 32objectives of. see objectivesoffice-holder. see office-holderprimacy of, 16, 18proclamation by, 33, 72–3, 80relationships of. see relationshipssectarian, 145secularization of, 190size of, 26, 189

story of, 32, 45, 154structure of. see structure,

congregationalsurvival of, 92tradition of, 33types of, 18–21, 145worship as main purpose of, 18, 30,

33, 44, 81, 138, 173, 188, 193see also church

consequentialist ethics. see utilitarianethics

constitution, 6, 31, 60–1, 77, 119, 134,183, 193

constraints, 41, 62, 130construction project, 167construction, social. see social

constructionconsultation, 4, 29, 39–41, 112, 125,

135, 174consumer, 198context, 44

cultural, 44, 53, 156, 160, 175–8,180–1

multi-faith, 83, 105New Testament, 116organizational, 74, 181

contingencytheory, 200plans, 100

contractbetween organizations, 109denominational, 12, 28for welfare provision, 122, 149,

156, 163in market, 31, 75, 120, 127, 150,

157–8, 160, 197public sector, 31, 62, 68, 79, 120,

150–1, 186within organization, 17, 73–5,

126–7, 157–8control

bureaucratic, 30, 34, 41–2, 93–4costs, 194denominational, 14, 17, 34, 43–4,

80, 95, 198failure, 35group, 39hierarchical, 76management, 163

240 Subject Index

control – continuednormative, 158of externalities, 161span of. see span of control

conversationopen, 147partner, 124

conversion, 2, 41–2, 88co-operation, 175

ecumenical, 32, 78, 96, 132multi-faith, 100theory, 101–5, 108

Corporate Social Responsibility, 136,158–60, 162

cosmopolitans, 45, 93cost

cutting, 151of externality, 161–2financial, 15–16, 194of monitoring, 157personal, 127production, 37, 100, 101transaction, 75, 156

councilborough/county, 22,108–10, 118,

131–4, 164–6, 184church. see church councilof churches, 93of Jerusalem, 2, 88

counseling, 83, 147, 166, 179creativity, 43, 174, 177–8credit union, 155creditor, 160–1creed, 24–5critic, 178critical, 120

discourse. see discourse, criticaltheory, 136, 163–5voice, 141, 148, 156

critique, social. see social critiquecrowd mode, 22cultural context. see context, culturalculture

British, ixcongregational. see congregation,

culture ofcontract, 28diverse, 152, 175, 180Japanese, 77

national, 10, 33, 146, 174–5, 180of company. see firm, culture ofof congregation. see congregation,

culture ofof service, 136–7of trust, 101, 126–7, 129, 133–4organizational, 38, 82, 126, 160, 180political, 119secular, 189, 11

curate, 35, 72, 132customer, 34, 131–2, 160, 199–200customization, 197–8

Dartford, 182–3deacon, xviii, 24, 35, 51–2, 80

140, 201deanery, 10, 22

synod, 118decentralization, 11, 36, 198decision-making

adaptive, 176administrative model, 176consultative, 175denominational, 113, 117hierarchical, 36–7, 76, 150innovative, 76, 176–7negotiated, 32non-rational, 36, 38political model, 38–41, 177process, 7programmed, 176religious, 42, 45, 59, 64, 66, 75, 130,

152–3routine, 176, 198

declaration of assent, 24delayering, 197democracy, 1, 11, 16demotivation, 35, 69, 154

see also motivationdenomination, x, 1

as brand, 17as bureaucracy, 9–11, 16, 30, 76, 94,

97, 118, 192as federation of congregations, 1,

9–12, 21–3, 28, 45, 47, 81, 194as global organization, 33–4, 96as national organization, 2, 9, 12,

16–17, 96, 112–13

Subject Index 241

as regional organization, 9, 16–17,30, 46, 54

as regulatory authority, 76as sociological category, 18–22,

47–9, 194bureaucratization of. see

bureaucratization, ofdenominational structures

clergy of. see clergy, denominationalcompetition between, 103constitution of, 31, 193co-operation between, 104definition of, 9, 21, 33–4, 43, 81diverse, 192engagement with state, 117–19, 151episcopal, 1, 14, 31, 35, 96finances of, 15–16, 71, 147formalization in. see formalizationinnovation in. see innovationisomorphism of. see isomorphismmainstream, 22, 29, 32, 92, 94management by, 12–13management of, 41–2mission organizations of, 76–80. see

also mission organizationnon-episcopal, 96parties in, 47political activity in, 45, 47relationships between. see

ecumenismsize of, 11theological convictions of, 10,

92, 95see also denominational

denominationalauthority/-ies. see authority/-ies,

denominationalboundary, 89–91, 96bureaucracy, 10, 15–18, 22, 30, 43,

81, 117, 179control. see control, denominationalélite. see élite, denominationalhierarchy. see hierarchy,

denominationalleader. see leader, denominationalmanagement. see management,

denominationalmerger. see merger, of

denominations

organization, 16policy. see policy, denominationalpostholder, 11–13, 16, 22, 30–1, 39,

46, 96–7, 165research and development, 180rules, 97strategy. see strategy,

denominationalstructure. see structure,

denominationalsee also denomination

Department for Communities andLocal Government, 169

Department for Education, 61dependency, 40, 58, 121

path, 121desacralization, 189developing country, 70, 121, 153development

agency, 154, 194building, 109, 182–3community. see community

developmenteconomic. see economic

developmentorganization, 50, 65Organization Development. see

Organization Developmentproject, 70, 159research and. see research and

developmentdeviance, 19, 40diakonein (to serve) 52dialogue, 98–9, 105, 110diocesan

authorities. see authorities,denominational/diocesan

board of finance, 12, 129, 193bureaucracy, 10, 12, 16staff, 46structures. see structure, diocesansynod, 16, 91, 118

diocese, 1, 10, 12, 15, 17–19, 22, 30,44, 77, 193

see also bishopDiocese of Southwark, 12, 16directionlessness, 177director, xiv, 76, 107

board of -s, 35, 60, 107, 150, 152

242 Subject Index

disabilities, people with, 182disciple, 3, 48, 51, 53, 88, 115,

138, 170disciplinary

multi-, 82–4procedures, 22power. see power, disciplinary

discourseaspirational, 173critical, 173–4instrumental, 173sceptical, 173–4

discretion, 27, 198disunity, 96doctrine, 24, 67, 141donor, xv, 54, 128, 200downsizing, 197drug dependency, 58

East Greenwich, 166, 168Parish of, xv, 23, 019

eco initiative, 147economic

approach, 161development, 159environment. see environment,

economicefficiency, 159exchange, 152, 158factors, 161goods, 160, 162incentive, 161influences, 78necessities, 161performance, 160production, 152regeneration, 147

economics, 38, 101, 161economies of scale, 11, 100–1, 176ecumenical/ecumenism, 11, 87–111

activity, 93–4, 97, 99chaplaincy, 100, 108, 110church school. see faith school,

ecumenicalclergy as, 32co-operation. see co-operation,

ecumenicalcourse, 32interdenominational 99

language, 97local, 96, 103management, 12multidenominational, 99national ecumenical body, 95relationships, x, 92–5, 97, 99, 107see also, Christian unity

Ecumenical Borough Dean, 32, 132–4,155, 166

educationauthority. see authority, educationChristian, 199facilities, 182faith-based, 54, 70, 73–4in company, 179mutual, 98, 130needs, 109organization. see organization,

educationalpolicy, ixreligious, 134

efficiency/efficient, 11, 104, 127,157–9, 198

equilibrium, 3elder, 3, 25, 35, 88–9elderly people, 155élite

denominational, 12liberal, 94

emergencyfood, 166planning, 131–4

emerging church, 78emperor, 115–16, 142, 186employee, 58, 62–3, 72, 74, 84–5, 157,

160, 176, 183, 186, 200employment, 50, 166, 184ensoulment, 169entrepreneur, 177–8, 181, 197environment

adaptation to, 6built, 172changing, 42ecological, 159, 162, 169, 182economic, 41, 179, 197–8habitual, 42institutional, 64military, 177organizational, 179, 197–8, 200

Subject Index 243

physical, 161–2, 179, 197relationship with, 9, 41resource, 179, 197–8secular, 20social, 64, 161, 165, 170–1, 179,

197–8, 200see also context; isomorphism

episcopal church. see church,episcopal

Episcopal Church of the United Statesof America, 31

equal opportunities legislation, 58equality, xvii, 28, 49, 75, 137–8, 141,

154, 160, 167, 169estate, housing, 172, 182–4ethics, 19, 94, 158–61, 164

code of, 159, 162committee, 162see also utilitarian ethics

ethnicity, 17, 117, 123Eucharist, xviii, 71, 82, 96–7, 138Europe, ix, 10, 65, 71, 136, 141, 156,

175, 201–2evangelical church. see church,

evangelicalevangelism, 19, 48, 52, 71–2, 90, 147,

164, 183evangelistic organization, 71, 104, 199excepted charity. see charity, exceptedexperiment, 77, 181expert power. see power, expertexpertise, 39, 93, 123, 126, 174, 176

secular, 59exploitation, 165externality, 161extravasation, 189

faith, 3, 51, 53, 55–7, 84and ethnicity, 123basis of, 121boundary of, 87different faiths, 88–91, 97–100, 102,

104–8, 110, 128, 130, 134, 196sector, 124–6teaching of, xviitradition, 24, 55, 63, 67, 99,

104, 106see also inter-faith; multi-faith

Faith and Social Action Officer, 131

faith community, xii–xiii, 2, 67building. see building, religiousChristian. see Christian Faithchaplains authorized by, 84–5conservative member of, 99consultation with, ixjoint venture, 105, 108–10leader, 83, 108–9, 123–5, 134member of, 82, 99, 105, 107, 109,

123–4, 134relationships with secular

institutions, 109–11, 117–19,125, 131–2, 135

representative of, 106, 109, 122–6,131, 133–4

representative body of, 123–5, 134see also inter-faith; multi-faith

Faith in the City, 131faith school, 55, 61, 99, 106, 180–1

ecumenical, 104faith-based organization, x–xii, 50–86

activities of, 58, 68, 122, 136, 146,181

as hybrid, 60, 74, 80, 151. see alsoorganization, hybrid

attached, 7, 50, 58, 60–1, 63–4, 67,69, 70–1, 74–6, 79, 85, 106, 109,121–2, 151, 153, 155,194–6, 200

autonomy of, 164budget, 68challenges, 185–94, 196–7change in, 75characteristics of, xiv, xvi, 51, 55–9,

61–2, 79, 81, 151, 196, 199charitable, 54communication by, 130connected religious organization, 7,

50, 52, 59–61, 63–5, 74, 146contracts, 66, 68, 74, 151, 156, 164definition of, x, 50, 55–6embedded, 155employees in, 62, 149engagement with community, ixenvironment of, 9formalization in. see formalizationfunding of, 50, 58–61, 65–7, 70–1,

74–5, 79, 151, 188, 194, 196governing body of, 66, 75

244 Subject Index

faith-based organization – continuedidentification as, 58, 73in new communities, 173isomorphism in. see isomorphismlocation of, 53, 55–7management of, xi–xii, xiv–xv, 53,

59, 62–3, 79, 81, 156, 201–3merger of, 79–81minister in, 22new, 64, 69–70, 120, 146, 169origins of, 50, 83–4oscillation of, 196outcome measurement, 67purpose of, 52–3regulation of, 7, 54, 128–9relationship with secular

institutions, 113, 120, 129,173–4

secularization of, 60, 63–4self-presentation of, 58social capital in, 119–22social justice activity, 152–3, 164spectrum of, 56–61, 63–4, 66, 6–9,

75, 79–82, 85, 106, 147–8, 196strategy. see strategy, in faith-based

organizationtraining in, 65types of, 57users of, 58–9, 63volunteers in, 148–9wandering, 59–61, 63, 66, 68–70,

75–6, 80, 151–2, 181, 195–6welfare provision by, 146–52, 164.

see also welfare provisionsee also mediating institution

family centre, 182federation of congregations, 18, 33,

47–8, 71see also denomination

fellowship, 150of congregations, 2, 4, 16, 47–9

female. see male/femalefinancial

accounts, 6, 54, 94, 128,161, 157

advice, 50capital. see capital, financialcontribution, 19, 199crisis, 71, 100, 148, 165, 182, 187

health, of company, 162reporting, 68resources, 7, 15–16, 92, 129, 147,

149, 187–8space, 63viability, 74, 189see also diocesan board of finance

Finland, 156firm, 36–41, 100–5, 127, 157, 197

change in. see change in companyclassical, 197competition/co-operation between

–s, 100–3, 105, 157, 175culture, 38, 127, 175–6. see also

culture; normsdecisions in. see decision-makingenvironment, 159. see also

environmentethics of. see ethicsgoals, 38, 40, 176in market, 157large, 100market in, 157modern, 42, 197multinational, 36objective, 36organic, 180political, 41postmodern, 185, 197–8stakeholders. see stakeholderstrategy. see strategy

flexibility, 48, 147, 178, 197–8food bank, 22, 74, 80, 121, 132, 134,

145, 155, 164–7forgiveness, 98, 102–3formal

group. see group, formalnetwork. see network, formalorganization. see organization,

formalpartnership. see partnership, formalrules. see rules, formal

formalization, 1, 6–8, 32, 40forum, 125–6

churches’, 132faith leaders’, 83inter/multi faith. see multi faith

forumForward in Faith, 95

Subject Index 245

France, ixfranchise, 17, 31–2Franciscans, 76free church. see church, freeFresh Expression of Church, 182Friday Prayers, 109funding

diversity of, 62from churches, 12, 147, 174, 182from government/public sector,

59–61, 67, 148, 150, 182–3lottery, 74, 108of congregations. see congregation,

finances/funding ofof faith-based organizations. see

faith-based organizations,funding of

of mission organizations. seemission organization,funding of

of voluntary organizations. seevoluntary organization,funding of

of welfare provision, 146. see alsosocial welfare, funding of

secular. see secular fundingsocial justice work, 146

gambling, 74, 108game

evolutionary, 107–8iterated, 102–3political, 2, 42theory, 102, 127

General Election, 133General Practitioner (GP) 29, 31–2General Synod of the Church of

England, 44, 118generosity, 3Gentile, 3, 88–9, 171

Christians. see Christians, GentileGermany, 146global/globalization, ix, 33–4, 36, 159,

176, 197goals

formalization of, 40individual, 36–7, 127measurable and achievable, 13

organizational, 38–41, 44–6, 62,127, 164, 176–7

religious, 62, 82God, xvii, 3–5, 13, 24–7, 35, 47, 50,

51, 88, 90–1, 98, 114–16, 137–43,170–2, 189–90

Kingdom of. see Kingdom of Godself-revelation of, 24, 67, 90–1,

97–8, 190Word/word of, 51, 90, 186, 190–1

Google, 197Gospel/gospel, xii, 4, 70–2, 90–1, 143,

171governance, ix, 10–11, 27, 34–5, 64,

107, 128–9, 138, 187, 192, 201governing

body, 6, 25, 27, 50, 60–1, 63, 65–6,74–5, 116, 164, 180, 187, 193,195–6

instrument, 129government, xiii

central/national, ix, 1, 65–7, 95,117–18, 120, 124, 128, 131,146, 149–50, 153–4, 156,160, 182

church. see governancefunding. see funding, from

governmentlocal, 117, 120, 123, 131, 169ministers/officials, 2, 118regional, 123

Greece/Greek, 47, 51, 117, 141, 185–6Greek Orthodox Church, 117Greenwich, 23, 109, 133–4, 145,

165–6Greenwich Borough Council, 108–9Greenwich Evangelical Leaders, 133Greenwich Faith Community

Leaders, 134Greenwich Foodbank, 50, 134, 165–7Greenwich Islamic Centre, 109Greenwich Local Labour and

Business, 166Greenwich Millennium Village,

108, 168Greenwich Park, 70Greenwich Passion Play, 70Greenwich Peninsula, 23, 99–100,

108, 172, 180

246 Subject Index

Greenwich Peninsula Chaplaincy, xv,78, 85, 87, 99–100, 105–11

Greenwich Peninsula RegenerationLtd. 110

Greenwich United Church, 109group

community. see community groupcongregation as, 1, 19–20, 48, 96,

108–9, 121, 131, 169, 174,180, 183

formal, 6, 38, 123, 175in congregation, xvii, 6, 19–21, 26,

45–6, 48, 50–2, 84, 87, 93, 104,122, 147, 153–5, 164, 166–7,180, 183

in firm, 38–9, 41, 74, 103, 108, 175,177–9

informal, 38, 123, 154, 159, 166inter/multi faith, 98–9, 124, 135of clergy, 42, 46voluntary organization as, 8, 12,

69, 154guilt, 127Gurdwara, 98

hate crime, 134healing, 53, 98, 172, 183health, 160

and safety, 40care, 31, 54, 70, 84, 132, 139, 172mental, 59problems, 148spiritual, 188

heaven, 53, 90, 141, 144, 171Hellenists, 51Herodians, 115hierarchy, 35–8

alternative, 15contingent, 13, 177–8denominational, 10, 12, 17, 26, 30,

32, 93, 192formal, 10, 38, 180independence from, 76–7,

177–8levels in, 28, 35, 38, 175, 180management, 35–7, 62, 104national, 77posts filled in, 30staff, 150

sub-, 36subsidiary, 13, 36

Hindu, 111, 125, 134Holy Communion, xviii

see also EucharistHoly Spirit, 5–6, 24, 51, 53, 88–9,

143, 170Holy Trinity, Greenwich Peninsula,

109, 180homeless

outreach, 147people, 58, 155

honour, 117, 140, 142hospice chaplain. see chaplain,

hospicehospital chaplain. see chaplain,

hospitalhospitality, xv, 52, 98, 140, 183House of Lords, 118, 153housing association, 55, 59–60, 74, 79,

168, 174Housing Benefit, 165human

capital, 126construct, xviidignity, 140life, 152nature, 148, 152resources, 101, 155, 187–8, 196

humanized leadership. see leadership,humanized

hybridorganization, 57–60, 74, 80,

150–1, 158transaction, 74

hybriditydegree of, 150entrenched, 150layers of, 60, 152management of, 60

hybridization, 151

Ichthus Fellowship, 20, 47–9idealism, 62, 177identity organization, 199ideology, 20, 46–7, 64, 158, 163, 200Imam, 125impartiality, 159, 161

Subject Index 247

imperativefundamental, 9, 13, 45–7. see also

imperative, primaryof external authority structure, x,

45, 47, 130, 188, 191primary, 76. see also imperative,

fundamentalproclamation as. see proclamation,

as imperativeto seek unity, 89worship as. see worship, as

imperativeincarnation, 67incentive

economic, 161market, 164motivation, 38, 175

inclusion, 65, 75, 91, 123, 169see also social inclusion

incomeCitizen’s, 167donations, 71, 128, 195earned, 96, 128, 147–8legacy, 71of congregation, 8, 54of member, 26subsistence, 38

India, ix, 99individualism, 152, 175inducement, 38industrial mission, 12, 71, 78–80,

82, 100industry, 71–2

standard, 157type of, 200

inequality, 154, 167influence, 6–7, 11, 33, 38–9, 45, 64–6,

75, 77–8, 103, 160, 162, 165, 181,198, 201

informalactivity, 172assistance, 148congregation. see congregation,

informalco-operation, 32group. see group, informalnetwork. see network, informalorganization. see organization,

informal

partnership. see partnership,informal

relationship, 1, 49, 94, 155rules. see rules, informalreward. see reward, informalsetting, 172structure. see structure, informal

informationcollection of, 174complete, 176cost of, 75fast transmission of, 197in organizations, 6, 157–8, 198incomplete, 36–8, 40, 126–7, 134,

156, 177organization, 197–8privileged, 40religions as, 198selective release of, 40, 163

injustice. see social injusticeinnovation, 8, 12, 32–3, 43–4, 46, 51,

76–8, 81, 158, 169–70, 176–80institution

authority of, 202definition of, 69–70fragmented, 156mediating, 69–70, 72, 109–11,

119, 134religious, ix, 25, 61, 84secular, ix, x, 61, 67, 69, 72, 77,

84–5, 112, 117–26, 129–30,153–5

social, ix, 64, 112, 119, 135institutionalism, new, 64, 163, 165inter denominational. see ecumenicalinter-faith

activity, 98–100, 169dialogue, 110forum, 105, 123project, 174relationships, x, 92, 97, 99representative body, 125understanding, 111worship, 99, 110see also multi-faith

intercommunion, 95–6interdependence, 103internal audit, 101interpersonal dynamics, 75

248 Subject Index

intuition, 175, 177inventor, 178investment, 101, 182investor, 182Ireland, 117Islamic

banking, 157centre, 109community, 105

isolation, organizational, 190isomorphism, 6–9, 11, 20–2, 64–5,

94–5, 126, 146 151, 181coercive, 7-control, 95, 152mimetic, 7normative, 7, 149

Israel, 98, 117, 139, 142, 144Italy, 117

Japan, 77, 175, 181Jehovah’s Witnesses, 19, 145Jerusalem, 2–3, 88, 114, 116

Council of, 88New, 171

Jesuits. see Society of JesusJewish

authorities, 114committee member, 134congregation. see congregation,

JewishChristians. see Christians, Jewishlaw. see law, Jewishorganizations. see organizations,

Jewishscriptures. see scriptures, Jewishsynagogue, 186territory, 171trustee, 111

Jews, 117, 144, 171, 185–6Jesus, 90

jobcharacteristics, extrinsic/

intrinsic, 175creation, 147, 167, 182enrichment, 179loss of, 96–7satisfaction, 175search for, 187security, 175

jointactivity, 98agenda, 65project, 22, 101, 105, 135venture, 101–5

jumble sale, 69justice. see social justice

karah prasad, 98key worker, 182Kingdom Family Church, 109Kingdom of God, x, 9, 18, 44, 50, 72,

74, 76, 78, 80–2, 115, 164, 170,173, 181, 192

kingdom organization, 72–3,79–80, 104

see also mission organization

langar, 98last resort, congregation as, 148Latin America, 36, 77law, 159

canon/charity, 54church, 25Jewish, 87–8, 91, 115, 139see also legal

lay training, 78leader/leadership

adaptable, 201as representative, 133charismatic, see charismatic,

leadershipdenominational, 19, 21, 32, 48, 89,

97, 112, 117development, 124ethical, 162faith community. see faith

community leaderhumanized, 62market, 100of congregation, xiv, 20power, 38–9relationship-oriented, 178secular literacy of, 202skill, 155State, 117–18style, 201task, 19, 43, 154task-oriented, 178

Subject Index 249

team, 49, 68, 180skills. see skills, leadershipvolunteer, 26

legalassistance, 29approach, 161authority. see authority, legalcontext. see context, legalentity, 129factor, 161incentive, 164responsibility, 161system, 157see also law

legislator, 112legitimate/legitimacy

activity, 45organizational, 17, 124power. see power, legitimatereligious, 34representational, 106, 123–5social, 64, 118, 123, 133, 173

Lewisham, 131–2liberal

elements of faith community, 99,110, 145

élite, 94minded, 93

liberation theology, 77library, 182line management 12–13, 85, 110literacy, 155

religious, 130, 202secular, 130, 202

little platoons, 119liturgy, 43, 78, 201living wage, 65lobbying, 58Local Area Agreement, 131local authority. see authority, locallocal councillor, 118locally orientated, 93London Churches Social Action

Network, 133London Citizens, 65London City Mission, 71London Industrial Chaplaincy, 80London Peace Pagoda, 99

love, 3God’s, 50, 115, 137mutual, 5–6, 138, 142of God, 137, 139of neighbour, 114, 137, 139

loyaltybrand, 100to company, 175to tradition, 24

Lutheran Church, 33

major incident plan. see emergencyplanning

majority, 41–2, 123see also church, black majority;

minority; conversionmale/female, xvii, 124, 141, 145management, x

active, 41as ideological, 163, 200as political, 38, 41–2, 44–5, 163board, 163budget, 68bureaucratic. see bureaucratic

managementby members, 187by objectives, 13central, 36, 47change. see change managementculture-specific, 175denominational, 10–12, 19, 41, 47hierarchy. see hierarchyinstrumental, 62layer/level, 35, 39, 175–6line. see line managementlocal, 36mechanistic, 62of chaplains. see chaplains,

management ofof clergy. see clergy, management ofof congregation. see congregation,

management ofof faith-based organization. see

faith-based organization,management of

of hybridity. see hybridity,management of

of mission organization. see missionorganization, management of

250 Subject Index

management – continuedof religious organization. see

religious organization,management of

of secularizations, 196of voluntary organization. see

voluntary organization,management of

of volunteers. see volunteers,management of

practice, 68private sector methods, 8, 13, 62public sector methods, 60, 62resource, 92science, 163secular techniques, 13, 151self-serving, 41staff, 68–9strategy. see strategy, managementstructure, 200style, 62, 201system, 41team, 61, 96, 180voluntary, 12voluntary sector methods, 62

management theorycritical, 163, 165problematic, 163scientific, 200secular, xi, 34–6, 41, 51, 62, 73,

79–82, 100–3, 106–7, 113,126–7, 156, 159, 165, 170, 174,189–91, 195, 197, 199–200, 202

manager, 38as entrepreneur, 177ethical, 160production, 37professional, 11public sector, 203research and development, 40sales, 37, 40secular, 64, 154skillful, 26voluntary sector, 8

marginalization, 12, 119, 123, 155market, 28, 37, 100, 157–8

changing, 178competitive, 8, 37, 100, 102,

157, 199

conditions, 36, 40, 100, 180contract, 75, 127, 157different, 101, 175entrepreneur in, 197firm as surrogate, 157global, 176, 197ideal, 65incentive, 164information in, 126, 156–7. see also

informationleadership, 100local, 176mechanisms, 156new, 100, 176niche, 46, 198regional, 100regulated, 157, 160–1relationships in, 127religious, 198–200share, 37transaction, 73, 75, 156–7,

163–4, 197market/organization, 157–8, 163

spectrum, 51, 101–2, 104, 136, 157transactions, 73, 75, 157–8

marketization of public services, 151marriage, 8, 69

heterosexual, 75homosexual, 117

martyr, 114, 170mass production, 197McDonaldization, 34, 197mediating institution. see institution,

mediatingmediation of external authority

structure, 18, 24, 190–2megachurch, 198member/membership, of congegation

accountability of, 27, 33, 191action for social justice, 118, 145,

153. see also social justiceas constituting the Church, 18, 200as customer, 199authority of, 8, 13, 16, 25–7, 42–3,

45, 153, 187, 190–1autonomy of, 34, 42, 188change in, 153concept of, 122cosmopolitan. see cosmopolitan

Subject Index 251

culture of, 45, 87decline in, 189definition of, 18–19, 21, 23differences between, 50, 87, 145effect of congregation on, 165embedded, 181exploitation of, 165funding of congregation. see

congregation, funding ofgoals of, 45–6governance by, 187group of. see groupincome of. see incomeincrease in, 26interests of, 122, 153localist/locally oriented. see locally

orientedlocation of, 118mindset of, 47minister as, 128–9moving to new congregation, 78,

180–1needs of, 18, 154, 198–9new, 26, 34, 183, 189, 191of clergy, 20, 103, 168. see also clergyof denomination, x, 1–2, 20, 27, 87,

92, 96–7, 104, 107of sect, 19–20, 42, 145political engagement, 146proclamation by, 45quiet care by. see quiet carerecruitment of, 20, 44, 173, 183relationship with faith-based

organization, 58, 146, 151, 188,194–5

relationships between, 1, 21, 33, 122retention of, 34secularization of, 188. see also

secularizationskills of, 144, 155social capital of, 173–4social class of. see classsocialization of, 158welfare provision within, 145, 153.

see also welfare provisionMember of Parliament, 118memorandum and articles, 193

menas faith leaders, 123–5religious volunteers, 145technical roles, 153

mental health, 59merger

of companies, 96, 101–2of denominations, 11, 22–3, 104of faith communities, 105of faith-based organizations, 79, 81of mission organizations, 79–81

Messy Church, 183Methodist Church, 9, 17, 22, 33, 76,

111, 132, 182–3Methodist Missionary Society, 76, 79Metropolitan Police Borough

Commander, 132Mexico, 175microeconomics, 101migrants, 44, 65, 131Millennium Dome/Exhibition,

108, 168minister, xvii–xviii

accountability of, 13, 24–9, 39,42, 92

appraisal of, 13, 25–6as chaplain/missioner, 70, 72, 85as member of congregation, 94,

128–9as member of party, 95as volunteer manager, 187authority of, 13, 24, 27–8, 43, 92,

128, 190career, 29–32competition between, 100conservative, 94denominational, 9, 14, 20, 22, 24,

28–9, 32, 39, 42–3, 46, 92ecumenism, 92, 94effectiveness of, 26–8isomorphism of, 94. see also

isomorphismlength of tenure, 16, 32–3mindset of, 46–7, 92of new congregation, 180of parish, 193payment of, 13, 29, 128–9professional, 32

252 Subject Index

minister – continuedrelationships between, 1, 20, 22,

84, 132relationship to secular authorities,

112, 118, 125, 132relocation of, 13–14, 29, 31, 70skills of, 14training of, 72, 203see also clergy

minority, 41–2, 98see also majority; conversion

missionactivity, 128, 169, 183agency, 192. see also mission

organizationbureaucratization of. see

bureaucratization, of missionactivity

Christian, 68, 72denominational, 12, 76, 79–80drift, 187–8, 194–5industrial. see industrial missionorganization. see mission

organizationurban, 154

mission organization, 192boundary spanning, 130challenges, 71–2, 78change in, 73chaplaincy as, 82, 85characteristics of, 51definition of, 50–1examples of, 70–1funding of, 12, 71–2, 80, 182–4independence of, 76innovation in, 51, 78management of, 79merger of, 79–81open system, 77proclamation as purpose, 72, 80relationship to denomination, 12,

76, 79–80relationship to faith-based

organizations, 72, 81relationship to religious

organizations, 1, 53relationship to secular

organizations, 1survival of, 71

tasks of, 52–3, 71see also kingdom organization

missional community, 72, 77missionary, 70, 72missionary organization, 158money, 3–4, 8, 15–16, 23, 37, 52, 59,

66–9, 101, 108, 126, 128–9, 158,165, 188, 194. see also funding

monitoring, 24, 65, 67, 157monopoly, 100, 157moral, ix, 27

agenda/framework, 85, 152compass, 159duty of care, 161rights, 159vision, 121

morality, ix, 152see also social morality

Moravian Church, 19, 54motivation, 35–6, 62–3, 65, 173,

175, 187ecumenical, 96of religious capital, 121, 173of welfare activity, 141personal, 62, 153religious, 82, 84, 149, 164see also demotivation

Muhammad, 98multi-faith

activity, 7, 97–100, 110–11, 169chaplaincy, 78, 83–4, 86–7, 99,

106–7forum, 123, 134funeral, 99organizations. see organizations,

multi faithpilgrimage, 99project, 105, 108, 134, 174relationships, 92, 97, 99, 123, 169

society, 84, 111welfare provision, 100see also inter faith

multinational company, 36musician, 31Muslim, 98–9, 108, 111, 117, 134

organization. see organization,Muslim

school, 99

Subject Index 253

mutualaccountability. see accountability,

mutualadjustment, 157–8assistance, 15, 156responsibility, 16, 49

Nash equilibrium, 37National Council for Voluntary

Organizations, 8National Health Service, 31–2, 84, 132National Lottery, 74, 108nationality, 117needs

individual/personal, 4, 36, 40, 58,82–3, 106, 109, 114, 130, 132,140, 142, 148, 150, 163, 165–7,169, 199–200

religious/spiritual, 82–4, 199social, 109, 129social welfare, 129, 153spiritual, 82–3, 106, 148stakeholder, 162see also member, needs

Neighbourhood Watch, 184network

accountability, 15, 24, 28–9, 33, 85,188, 192

community, 123–4congregation as, 173faith, 125, 146, 148–9, 155family, 105formal, 121friendship, 105informal, 121of authorities, 24, 28of congregations, 76, 78, 92, 155,

179–80, 192of outlets, 101of relationships, 33, 35, 38, 99,

119–20, 122, 146, 148–9,155, 173

of sales agents, 101organization as, 197social, 122, 146, 148–9, 155, 173

neutral territory, 148new and changing communities, x,

14, 129, 146, 168–70, 172–4

New Testament, xii, 2, 4, 43, 45, 87,116–1, 130, 164, 170, 181,191, 201

see also scripturesNew Wine Church, 133NGO, 65niche market, 46, 198night shelter, 55, 155non-profit. see not-for-profitnormative

compliance structure. seecompliance structure,normative

federation, 21–2isomorphism. see isomorphism,

normativestructure. see structure, normative

norms, 12, 22, 32, 113, 123, 126–7,145, 156–8, 173

Northern Ireland, ixnot-for-profit, 54, 199

oath of allegiance, 25objective

company, 36, 74, 104–5congregational, 13deparmental, 74external, 105faith community, 105, 202management by -s, 13organizational, 74, 156, 187personal, 38, 69, 74, 105religious, 74, 202satisficed, 176secular, 74–5subsidiary, 74survival as, 74

objects of company or trust, 193obligations, 75, 152, 160–1observer, 200office-holder

congregational, xvii, 2, 93, 187denominational, 97

offshoring, 197Old Testament, see New Testament;

scriptures, Jewisholigopoly, 100Olympic and Paralympic Games,

132–3

254 Subject Index

open system. see system, openordinand, ordination candidate, 40,

46–7ordination

decleration at, 24of women, 15training, 30, 40, 70

organization/organizationalactivity. see agency activityaim, 44, 48, 66, 94, 176, 187. see also

organization/organizationalgoals

autonomous, 11, 17, 30–1, 34, 43,47, 103, 153, 164

behaviour, 6, 13, 22–3, 27, 45–6, 51,66, 81, 97, 101, 103–4, 119,127, 160–1, 163, 188, 200

boundary, xvii, 5–6, 18–22, 43, 87,91, 93–4, 107, 119–20, 122,130, 151, 163, 174, 191–3, 197

bureaucratic. see bureaucracycapital, 127central, 17centralized, 11–12, 17–18, 21, 36challenges, 186–203charitable. see charitable company;

charitable trust; charityChristian, xi, xiv, 33, 45, 50, 56, 71,

73, 113, 117, 120, 133, 138,144, 172, 202

closure, 40, 59, 80, 92, 187, 189,192–3

constituents of, 6critique of, 165culture. see culture, organizational;

congregation, culture of; firm,culture of

definition of, 69, 156, 163denominational. see

denominational organizationdifferentiated, 7distinct(ive) 9, 21, 120, 123, 125,

129, 131, 146, 149, 151,157–8, 197

diversity of, 19, 62, 117, 120, 173,187, 192–3, 195, 198

educational, 57engagement, ix, 65–7, 92–3, 106,

109, 113, 117–19, 124–5, 130–2,

135, 144–6, 148, 150, 152–4,165, 168, 173–4, 176, 183

environment of. see environment,organizational

evangelistic, 71, 104, 183, 199faith-based. see faith-based

organizationsfluid, 156, 178, 193formal, 11, 17–18, 148formalization of. see formalizationfranchise. see franchisefunding of. see fundingglobal, 33–4, 176goals of. see goals, organizationalgoverning body of. see governing

bodyhierarchical. see hierarchyhybrid. see hybrid organizationindependent, 1, 4, 12, 29, 47–8, 54,

71, 73, 76–7, 81–2, 92, 94, 100,118, 132–3, 136, 155, 179, 190,192–3

informal, 38, 49, 158, 163, 192information. see information

organizationinstability, 49interests, 11, 160, 163international, 17isomorphism of. see isomorphismJewish, xikingdom. see kingdom organizationlanguage, 130. see also literacylarge, 35, 100, 150/market spectrum, transaction. see

market/organizationmission. see mission organizationmulti faith, xi–xii, 107multi-organizational, 103Muslim, 67national, 2, 11, 16–17, 33non-sectarian, 149norms. see normsnon-profit. see not-for-profitnot-for-profit. see not-for-profitobjective of. see objectiveopen system. see system, openpolicy of. see policypolitical. see political organization

Subject Index 255

politics in, 44. see also politics,organizational

post-holders in. see alsopost-holder

position in, 39power in, 37, 40–2. see also powerpriorities, 68private sector. see private sector

organizationprocess, 34, 68, 76, 94–5, 101, 123,

147, 149, 153, 157–8, 162, 176,178–9, 181, 190, 192, 196, 198,200, 202

professional, 158public sector. see public sector

organizationpurpose of. see purpose,

organizationalregional, 9, 15–17, 21, 29–30, 46, 54,

95, 10, 103, 112–13, 123–4, 159religious. see religious organizationrelationships between, x, xiii, 6,

8–9, 42, 68, 87, 102, 104–5, 110,128–30, 134, 146

representative, 125, 133representative of, 10, 20, 61, 72, 76,

89,95, 108, 118, 123–5, 131–5,155, 184

secular. see secular organizationsservice. see service organizationsmall, 21, 48, 79, 114, 147, 150,

154, 174, 177, 179, 189social welfare. see social welfare

organizationspectrum. see spectrum,

organizationalstaff post, 39State. see State organizationstructure. see structure,

organizationalsurvival of, 6, 8, 46, 71, 74, 92, 154,

170, 177, 188, 194temporary, 125third-sector. see voluntary

organizationturmoil, 196umbrella, 8–9, 16–18, 44,

124, 166unity. see unity, organizational

values of. see values, organizationalvoluntary. see voluntary (sector)

orgnizationOrganization Development, 179orphan, 114Orthodox Church, 117, 201outcomes, 15, 37, 39, 44, 67, 103, 164,

176–8outputs, 102, 150, 158outsourcing, 150, 198

Pakistan, ix, 117parachurch organization, 199parish, 1, 8–10, 14–19, 23, 27, 31, 39,

44, 46, 54, 61, 65, 72, 94–5, 118,129, 151, 192–3

population of, 18, 23territorial, 23, 118

Parish of East Greenwich, xv, 23,109, 168

Parliament, 54, 117–18parliamentary constituency, 118Parochial Church Council, 9, 17, 31,

129, 192partnership

board, 122–6, 131, 174business, 31civil, 117faith/secular, 57, 183formal, 149–50informal, 149inter-sector, 8, 55, 66, 150–2strategic, 101–2, 104–5, 131

party, ecclesiastical, 47passion play, 70, 104pastoral care, xvii–xviii, 22–3, 32, 71,

83, 109, 128path dependency, 121patronage system, 4, 192payment

of salary/stipend, 13, 15–16, 72, 80,129, 175

of tax, xv, 54, 115–17, 28, 153, 162,165–7

peace, 89, 98, 116, 172mala, 99network, 147pagoda, 99vigil, 135

256 Subject Index

pension scheme, 71pentecostal church. see church,

pentecostalPeople of God, 190persecution, 2, 6, 114, 116–17, 170personal

commitment, 145enthusiasms, 188evangelism, 71experience, xvifactors, 160irreducibility of the, 140,

148, 163objectives/motives, 74, 105, 179pronoun, xviirelationships, 4, 76–7, 132, 174satisfaction, 177story, 46support, 20, 40values, 69, 161

personalityforce of, 19, 38, 48founding, 20sale of, 199types, 145

personnel, 7, 9, 16, 48, 59, 63,69–70, 100, 117, 119, 130,146, 202

Pharisees, 88, 115pioneer, 78, 182–4planning, 7, 30, 44, 131, 153, 162,

182, 185pluralism, 119, 156Poland, 117police

chaplaincy, 132community support officer, 184consultation with, 112Metropolitan, 112, 132station, 109–10

policydenominational, 28formation, 65government, ix, 65, 150making, xiii, 65, 107, 131, 167organizational, 95, 107, 196public, 159–60, 162

politicalaction, 48, 146activity, 41, 45, 153. see also politics,

organizationalcapital. see capital, politicalchurches as, 112coalition, 41decision-making. see

decision-making, politicalmodel

ecclesiastical, 47factors, 161games, 42grouping, 17institution, 78management as, 163organization, 146process, 41skills, 38territory, 32

politicsChristians in, 174democratic, 119organizational, 2, 36, 38–9, 42,

44–5, 47. see also politicalactivity

Pope, the, 17, 25, 35, 77, 201post

application for, 12, 15, 30, 58chaplaincy, 80, 100incumbency/ministry, 16, 23, 28–9,

31, 187redundancy of, 186–7

post-holdercompany, 101denominational. see

denominational post-holderpaid, 15, 188

postmodernaspects, 198era, 197firm. see firm, postmodernorganization, 197world, 94

poverty, 3, 70, 147, 152, 154, 167power, 38–42

and politics, 38, 44and responsibility, 14asymmetrical, 163

Subject Index 257

balance of 38bargaining, 100bureaucratic, 39–40coercive, 28, 39cultural, 38definition of, 37–8denominational, 2, 16,

18, 46disciplinary, 40distance 175expert, 39hidden, 40lack of, 46, 154latent, 40leader, 39, 199legitimate, 39pull techniques, 40push techniques, 40referent, 39reward, 38–9self-serving, 41socialized, 41ubiquitous, 41

prayer, 4, 51, 53, 71, 90, 94, 96, 108–9,116, 140, 174

Friday, 109group, 21mat, 82space, 82, 100, 106, 108–10

predictability, 31, 41, 100, 198preferential option for the poor, 77preferred supplier, 101–2, 104–5Presbyterian Church, 117president of temple, 125press office, 7press, the, 112priest, xvii–xviii, 9, 24, 27, 35–6, 46,

118, 132, 201see also clergy; minister

primary authority structure. seeauthority structure, primary

Primary Care Trust, 184principal/agent theory, 24, 28, 35prison, 114, 139, 165

chaplain. see chaplain, prisonservice, 81thought -, 40

prisoner, 143former, 61-’s dilemma, 37, 102

private sector, 55–6accountability in, 24characteristics of, 57, 62critique of, 153–5games in, 42literature, xiimanagement methods from, 7–8,

13, 16, 34, 36, 42, 62organization, 42relationships with other sectors, 8,

53, 61, 69, 74, 104, 109, 120,129, 155, 174, 189

representatives of, 126structures, 10study of, 202

procedures, 176accounting, 7disciplinary, 22

proclamationas imperative, x, 9, 13, 44–5, 76,

164, 170, 173, 192, 202as religious activity, 52–3, 61, 82as purpose of mission organization,

50, 71–3, 78, 80–1, 85–6by apostles, 52–3, 89, 96, 170,

185–6by congregation, 18, 24, 33, 73, 148,

181, 188, 192by Jesus, 143by religious orders, 70Christian, 104critique as, 165

product, 40–1, 100–1, 157–8, 175,177–8, 198

customized, 197production, 37, 101–2, 127, 152, 157,

181, 197mass-, 197–8

professionalbody, 7career, 29–30clergy, 7, 32ecumenical, 32norms of, 32organization, 158secular, 76

258 Subject Index

professional – continuedspiritual care, 83–4volunteer management as, 8

profitmaximization of, 36, 102, 176repatriation of, 121

projectBeacon, 182–4building, 7, 167choice of, 68congregational, 57development, 70ecumenical, 99, 132faith-based, 121, 188, 194funding of, 74, 187–8joint, 22, 101, 103, 105, 135multi faith, 98–100, 105–6, 108,

134, 174regeneration, 113, 148research, 141, 156social justice, 144–5, 164. see also

social justicesocial welfare, 7, 21, 145, 147–8,

169, 173. see also social welfarespecial, 14-specific, 66

prophet, 2, 5, 89, 98, 142–4, 152prophetic activity, 152Protestant

Christians, 144denominations, 77reform movement. see reform

movement, Protestantpsychologist, 37psychological

needs. see needs, psychologicalpossibility, 95theory, 199

publicapprobation, 115, 119authority. see authority, publicbenefit, 9, 53–4, 61, 128expenditure, 186morals, ixpolicy, 159–60, 162sacrament, 174services, 151transport, 168

public sector, x, 55–6, 60accountability in, 24board members from, 64, 76characteristics of, 57, 62clergy in, 22communication with, 67contracts. see contract, public sectorcritique of, 153–5expectations of other sectors, 149funding from. see funding, from

government/public sectorliterature, xiimanager, 203management methods from, 7–8,

13, 16, 34, 36, 42, 60, 62organization, 42, 68, 129, 150–1partnership boards. see partnership

boardrelationships with other sectors, 8,

53, 59, 61, 69, 74, 104, 109,120, 129, 132, 149, 151, 155,174, 189

representatives of, 126structures, 10study of, 202

publishing, 19, 104, 199purpose

charitable, 9, 53–4, 128evangelistic, 183of business, 160, 162, 164of life, 152of congregation, 13, 173, 188, 201of faith–based organization, x, 50,

52–3, 63, 66, 72–4, 187of inter-faith organization, 105of mission organization, 50–1, 53,

72, 80of multi-faith organization, 98–9,

106of religious organization, 173of voluntary organization, 8, 120,

187, 194organizational, 63welfare, 120, 147

quality of life, 160, 169quiet care. see care, quietQur’an, the, 98, 104

Subject Index 259

Ravensbourne College, 109–10, 168recession, 182reconciliation, 19–20, 67recruitment

of congregation members, 19–20,42, 180

of employees, 58, 60, 64, 68–9, 176of ministers, 31, 36of missionaries, 71of governing body, 50, 58, 68, 76of volunteers, 60, 64, 68, 85, 145,

166, 186–7, 194–5Reform, 95reform

ecclesiastical, 22movement, 77

Reformation, the, 136, 201reformed church. see church, reformedregeneration

activity, 100, 147of community, 172programmes, 147project, 14, 113, 148see also economic regeneration

regional. see organization, regionalregulation

of chaplaincies, 100of charities, 54, 128of congregation/denomination, 1,

6–7, 44, 76, 140, 180of companies, 160–1of ecumenical relationships, 95of market, 157

relationshipsecumenical. see ecumenical

relationshipsexternal, x–xiinter faith. see inter faith

relationshipsinternal, xmulti faith. see multi faith

relationshipsreligion

advancement of, 9, 109, 128, 147as a category, xias a market. see market, religiousbenign, 118Christian, 17, 84, 169

constitutive of faith-basedorganization, 56, 59

distinctive –s, xi, 98, 104effect of sacred texts on, xiiimportance of, ix, 202informational, 198mass-production, 198modern, 198official, 117plural, 69, 98, 104, 119practised at home, 145privatization of, 202relationship to ethnicity and

nationality, 117relationship to volunteering, 144relationship with welfare provision,

114, 122, 136, 141research on, 141, 156respect for, 119worship as location of, 96, 169

religiousactivity, 61, 65, 71, 74, 109, 138,

145–6, 189, 198. see alsoaffective activity

affiliation, 58, 105, 144, 151belief, 21capital. see capital, religiouschaplaincy as, 106conflict, ixcongregation as, 11, 18, 130, 191convictions, 68, 152duty, 140education. see education, religiousera, 90experience, 55, 190, 198funding, 151, 194. see also fundinggoals. see goalshistory, 112inspiration, 69language, 67, 130, 146literacy, 67, 130, 202market-place. see market, religiousmotivation, 149mutual assistance as, 15needs. see needs, religious/spiritualnot-for-profit. see not-for-profitobjective, 74order, 27, 53, 70, 73, 76–7

260 Subject Index

religious – continuedorganization. see religious

organization; congregation;church

practice, ix, 44purpose, 54, 72resources, 119, 199sector, 54–5, 56–7, 60, 71, 74, 119,

122–3, 202secularization, 189–90. see also

secularization, religioustasks, 52–3thought categories, 11tradition, 50, 53, 55–7, 60, 84, 106,

145, 152values, 147volunteers, 151. see also

volunteerwelfare provision as, 136

religious organizationas religious, 96authority structures of. see authority

structurebureaucratization of. see

bureaucratizationcentralized, 36challenges facing, xii, 151,

185–94, 197changing, 156, 196characteristics of, x, xiii, 55,

151, 199charitable, 53, 128Christian, xi, 202compliance structures of. see

compliance structurescongregation as prototypical, 1, 16,

18, 30, 76, 113, 179, 181conservative, 153constitution of, 193critique by, 121culture of, 180. see also

congregation, culture ofdefinition of, x, 1, 72denomination as, 33distinctive, 27, 54, 57, 107, 120,

123, 128, 146, 151–2formalization of. see formalizationglobal, 33–4

governance of, ix, 187. seegovernance

hierarchies in. see hierarchyisomorphism of. see isomorphismmanagement of, xi, xii, xiv, xv, 13,

63–4, 106, 156, 165, 187–94,200, 202–3

mission organization as, 51network accountability of. see

accountability, networknetwork-creating, 173political capital of, 121politics in. see politics; politicalprotection against secularization

of, 80regeneration activity of, 172, 181relationships of, ix, x, 50, 52–3, 55,

58–61, 68–70, 73–7, 84, 113,117, 127, 129, 134, 151,174, 181

representative of, 125–6resources of, 122, 149sacred text of, xiisector, 54secular literacy of, 130secularization of. see secularizationsocial justice role of, 152–5. see also

social justicestructure. see structure, of religious

organizationtheology of, 92welfare role of, 120–1, 148, 150–3,

155. see also social welfareworship the defining activity

of, 120see also congregation; church;

Church; faith-basedorganization

religious/secular spectrum, 51, 53, 57,59–61, 63–4, 66, 68–70, 74–5,79–82, 84, 86, 104, 106–7, 119,147–8, 181, 196

representativeof clergy, 10of the Church, 133of congregation, 72, 89, 118,

125, 135of denomination, 20, 72, 95, 125,

133, 155

Subject Index 261

of faith sector, 122–5, 133–5of mission organization, 76of religious organization, 61, 72, 134of secular organization, 61, 108,

132, 184research

and development, 40literature, xi, xv–xvi, 2, 97, 179religious sector, 10, 32, 56, 58, 60,

62–4, 73, 83, 107, 131, 141, 156private sector, 107, 120, 176,

179, 200voluntary sector, 6, 120

residents’ association, 183resource mobilization theory, 92resources, 13, 23, 28–9, 37–9, 44, 59,

70, 83–4, 119–20, 122, 126,146–7, 194, 198–9

financial, 7, 15–16, 92, 126, 149,165, 188

human. see human resourcesmaterial, 3, 92, 155shortage, 188, 193theological, 92, 141, 191, 199

responsibilitycorporate social, 158–62for reconciliation, 67legal, 161mutual, 16pastoral, xvii–xviii, 83. see also

pastoral careposition of, 29–30, 95power and, 14social, 80, 136

restrictive practice, 97resurrection, of Jesus, 3, 53, 90,

115, 170reward

for compliance, 40for service, 141informal personal, 127, 177power. see power, reward

rights, 147, 152, 159, 161risk, 7, 37, 64–5, 89, 97, 163, 176–7role

denominational, 46in bureaucracy, 13, 22, 30, 96, 180in congregation, 94, 153leadership, 48, 68

minister’s, 24volunteer’s, 83

Roman Catholicbishop, 97chaplain, 111Church, 23, 25, 27, 36, 65, 77, 95–6,

133, 190, 193, 198, 201congregation/parish, 44, 65, 95, 97diocese, 75member, 117priest, 9, 118, 132province, 33

routinization, 15, 20, 179Royal Borough of Greenwich. see

Greenwich Borough Councilrules, 176

church representation, 193of life, 71, 73denominational, 97formal, 127–8informal, 127

rural community. see community,rural

rural dean, 10, 20

sacramentadministration of, xvii, xviii, 83Church as, 129public, 174reserved, 82

sacred texts. see scripturessafeguarding of children and

vulnerable adults, 134see also child protection

salesagent, 101department, 19, 40, 101future, 37manager, 37, 40

Salvation Army, 71, 73, 132Samaritan, 90sanctions, 38–9, 97, 127, 160–1satisficing, 176Scandinavia, 112scenario planning, 162, 179schism, 20, 77scholarship, 70

262 Subject Index

school, 70, 165business, xiv, 202faith. see faith schoolgovernor, 184state/community, 180–1, 183

Scotland, 117scriptures, 143, 185–6, 190, 201

Christian/Church’s, xi, xii, 24,164, 171

Hebrew/Jewish, xii, 139see also New Testament; Old

Testamentsect, 18–22, 47–9, 88, 93, 145, 194

boundary of, 6, 20–21reconciliation within, 19–20recruitment into, 19–20, 42

Section 106 Agreement, 184sectarian, 6, 20, 22, 48, 93, 145sector

faith. see faith sectorfaith-based, 54, 126, 202–3other (i.e., not religious) xi, 8, 27,

42, 54–5, 58, 62, 64, 81, 122,127–9, 134, 136, 144, 146,150–1, 202

private. see private sectorpublic. see public sectorreligious. see religious sectorsecular. see secular sectorsocial housing, 59third (voluntary), 150. see also

voluntary sectorvoluntary. see voluntary sector

secularactivities, 80agency, 59, 65/attached spectrum, 63authorities. see authorities, secularenvironment. see environment,

secularexpertise, 59Europe, 71/faith partnership, 57funding, 67–8, 147influence, 64, 181institution, x, 61, 69, 72, 77, 84,

110, 117, 153–5literacy, 130, 202

management theory. seemanagement theory, secular

methods, 68objectives, 74–5organization, x, 8, 13, 35, 44, 51,

57–9, 62–6, 69–70, 79, 81, 104,106–7, 111, 113, 119, 121, 124,128, 130, 145–8, 153–4. see alsobureaucracy, secular; privatesector organization; publicsector organization; voluntary(sector) organization

outcome measurements, 67outlook, 14/religious spectrum. see

religious/secular spectrumrulers, 115–16, 138, 142sector, 60, 155housing association/sector, 59, 79society/world, x, 20, 62, 69–70, 72,

74, 94, 114, 118, 128, 130, 156,172, 191

staff member, 63, 66, 76task, 68thought categories, 15training course, 64values, 68

secularist hegemony, 119secularization, ix, 188, 202

cultural, 189, 191defences against, 66institutional, 189of beliefs, 189of bishop, 14–15of congregation, 65of denominational strucure, 15of faith-based organizations, 60of ideas, 189, 191of society, 71plural, 189–90, 195–6practical, 189pressures, 64religious, 65, 189–92, 195–6state, 189

self-confidence, 41–2, 177senior management team, 96, 179–80sensory garden/room, 182

Subject Index 263

servantauthorities as, 116, 138Christian as, 4, 137, 142Church as, 129, 164Jesus as, 137minister as, 26–7, 35, 138

serviceconcept of, 150culture of. see culture of serviceentrepreneur, 177mutual, 49, 138, 150organization, 17, 58, 63–4, 71,

148–9, 151, 156, 163religious, 82, 109, 133, 183user, 200

services, 169complementary, 156, 166market for, 157–8reduction of, 186social, 57, 59, 71, 75, 182specialist, 58

shame, 127shareholder, 41, 160–1Sheffield Industrial Mission, 79shepherd, 26–7, 91, 139shopping centre, 106shrine, 90Sikh, 98, 111, 123, 125, 134skills

appropriate, 14, 31, 63, 132, 197arbitration, 95combination of, 101congregational, 173knowledge worker, 197leadership, 155literacy, 155management, 26political, 38presentational, 155professional, 158social. see social skillsstandardization of, 157–8trustees’, 59

slave, slavery, 137, 141–2, 172social

acceptance, 164action, 48, 67, 99, 131, 133,

148, 172activity, 82–3, 96, 156

agent, 152behaviour, 163benefit, 8, 119capital. see capital, socialcare. see care, socialchange, 174, 197class, 22, 145cohesion, 122, 131, 174construction, 78context, 32, 156, 173dynamics, 38, 106environment. see environment,

socialevent, 92–3, 98–9, 105, 110, 183forms, 129goods, 159–60, 182housing, 59–60, 168, 182inclusion, 65, 123. see also inclusioninequality, 167influences, 78injustice, 154, 164institution, ixissues, 112justice, x, 21, 71, 113, 121, 129–30,

136, 141–50, 152–6, 164–5, 167,169, 172

legitimation, 173life, 163morality, 153. see also moral;

moralityneeds. see needs, socialnetwork, 122norms. see normspossibility, 95pressure, 160problem, 50process, ixproject, 7, 173. see also welfare

provisionrecognition, 144resources, 120, 147responsibility , 80, 136, 158–60, 162scientist, 2security benefits, 80services. see services, socialservice organization. see

organization, social serviceskills, 144space, 63, 77, 173

264 Subject Index

social – continuedstructures, 112, 152, 163thought, 65welfare. see social welfare

social welfare, 52, 64–5, 70–1, 74, 81,147–8, 150, 152, 156, 164

organization, 66project, 7, 21, 144, 147–8see also welfare provision

socialization, 145, 158, 160society

American, 34bible, 99civic, 125civil, 112, 119, 124–5, 128contractualized, 156critique of, 121, 165culture of, 191enclosed, 19global, 159informally organized, 158marginalization by, 155multi faith. see multi-faith societynational, 159plural, 119, 130, 152regional, 159religious history of, 112secular. see secular societyservice to, 23, 136, 150, 164shaping of, 74values of, 159–60, 162

Society of Jesus, 77sociology, 37sole trader, 177solidarity, 140, 147soup kitchen, 155South American Missionary

Society, 79South London Industrial Mission, 80Southern Baptists, 31Southwark and London Diocesan

Housing Association, 60space

consultation, 131financial, 63–4industrial, 182meeting, 131neutral. see neutral spaceoffice, 182

physical, 174prayer, 82, 100, 106, 109–10social, 63–4, 77, 173worship, 22

span of control, 35specification

of part, 101of product, 157of task, 126

spectrumco-operation, 101–4linear, 55–7market/organization. see

market/organization spectrumreligious/secular. see

religious/secular spectrumspiritual

blessings, 3capital. see capital, spiritualcare, 83Church as, 77counsel, 83health, of congregation,188ministries, 49needs. see needs, spiritualwelfare. see welfare, spiritual

St Christopher’s Hospice, 81–4stability, periods of, 49, 103, 108, 163,

174, 177, 179staff member

activity, 107, 128, 149, 186,188, 194

allocation of, 23behaviour of, 34department, 42ethics of, 161from other sectors, 8, 59–60, 66, 81function, 39hospital, 84management of, 68mission organization, 51motivation, 62–3, 187ownership by, 8paid, 8, 75, 83, 128, 149–50, 166,

186, 188position, 39post, 30qualified, 7recruitment of, 64, 68–9, 106

Subject Index 265

relationship with client, 59relationships, 74religious convictions of, 60, 62–3school, 99secularization of, 64senior, 46shedding, 101, 186supply of, 64training, 68values of. see values, of staff membervolunteer management by,

187–8, 194stagnation, 190–1stakeholder, 27, 74, 160–2, 164standardized

measures, 73methods, 197norms, 158outputs, 158processes, 158skills, 157–8

Starbucks, 17, 31State

accountability to, 8church relationship with, 112,

115–17, 129–30, 145, 151church critique of, 156church social justice work in

relation to, 156denomination’s relationship with,

117–18European, 65faith community relationships

with, 118ideal, 65local manifestations of,

113, 117nation, 65, 136organization, 117regulation, 54secularization. see secularization,

statestructure. see structure, statewelfare, 152welfare provision. see welfare

provision, Statestatistics, 147, 164stipend, 29, 129storytelling, 183

strategicactivity/behaviour, 13, 38, 97decisions, 150partnership, 101–2, 104–5, 174planning, 182

strategyagreed, 102, 187bargaining over, 38business, 162change in, 72corporate social responsibility,

162, 164denominational, 7evolution of, 100formulation of, 122, 132funding, 187global, 36goal-directed, 40–1, 164in faith-based organization, 122in new contexts, 176management, 11robust, 152

Street Pastors, 132, 145, 155structural relationship, 55, 58, 60, 85,

102, 110, 112structure

ambiguous, 39appropriate, 132–3, 201authority. see authority structurebureaucratic, 1, 10, 12, 14, 21, 93career, 30cognitive, 163compliance. see compliance

structurecongregational, x, 7, 9, 11–12, 27,

43, 48, 77, 173 187, 192, 200contract, 158corporate social responsibility, 162democratic, 1denominational, x, 8–12, 14–15, 22,

30, 34, 42–3, 71, 78, 92, 95–6,103, 112, 145, 179–80, 192, 199

devolved, 36diocesan, 12, 19, 22, 33diverse, 48, 146, 193evolved, 193federal, 1flatter, 35

266 Subject Index

structure – continuedflexible, 178, 198from other sectors, 202funding, 183governance, 27, 35, 107, 138,

192, 201hierarchical, 77, 104, 192increasing, 52informal, 38, 163innovation, 179inter-faith, 134–5internal, 25layers, 179loose, 77management. see management

structuremanagement of, xmatrix, 177–8mission, 12national, 9, 12, 21, 31normative, 163of relationships, 158, 177of religious organization, xorganic, 180organizational, 6–7, 36, 40–1, 44,

48, 51, 120, 145parish/parochial, 151, 193payment, 183recruitment, 31regional, 9regulative, 163representative, 135social. see social structuresstate, 10, 65subsidiary, 193synodical, 192taller, 35theological, 98, 201traditional, 201–2two-tier, 128welfare, 147workgroup, 178

subgroup, 6, 21, 153subordinate, in private sector

organization, 13, 158subsidiarity, 140substance abuser, 155

supplier, 100–2, 160, 199preferred, 101–2, 105local, 176

Sure Start, 184synagogue, 89, 142–4, 185–6system

benefits, xvbureaucratic, 34business, 160denominational, 14legal, 157management, 41medical notes, 83open, 9, 64, 77–8, 197organizational, 6parish, 23, 118, 192patronage, 14values, 121, 162welfare, 148

target, 12, 26–7, 62tax

authorities, 54avoidance, 121, 153, 167bedroom, 165–6compensatory, 162exemptions, 54reclaim, 54, 128registration, 54Roman, 115, 117system, xv

teaching, xvii, 47–8, 53, 88, 99,136, 183

team, 38-building, 179challenges for, 178chaplaincy, 72, 79–82, 84–6,

99–100, 106–7, 109effective, 178flexible, 197independent, 71industrial mission. see team,

chaplaincyineffective, 178leadership. see leadership, teammanagement. see management,

teammerger, 79–80multi-disciplinary, 83–4

Subject Index 267

multi-faith, 106–7, 109spiritual caregivers, 83–4volunteer welcomers, 109working, 197

technology, 78, 190, 200change in. see change, technological

temple, 98, 115, 125, 137tension, 41, 43, 60, 75, 79, 99Thames Gateway, 182–3Thamesmead, 165–6The O2, 109, 167theological

changing, 98characteristics, 15, 96college, 30, 47, 192convictions, 10, 88, 145differences, 10, 32, 88, 91, 96, 98distinctiveness, 94factors, 201issues, 92language, 35literature, 140objectives, 74resources, 141structure. see structure, theologicaltendencies, 192training, 183underpinning, 90unities, 91, 96, 141values, 92views, 1, 92

theologyconservative, 94, 122, 145experimental, 77founding, 20liberal, 145liberation, 77local, 141mission, 79worship as location of, 96

third world solidarity, 147tit-for-tat, 103toddler group. see carers’ and toddlers’

grouptrade union, 38, 41, 73, 65, 93, 95tradition. see Christian traditiontraditional authority. see authority,

traditional

training, 13, 17congregational, 48, 78control of, 17course, 39, 46, 64, 72faith-friendly, 65lay, 78medical, 82of chaplains, 110of clergy, 30, 39, 46, 70, 72, 99safeguarding, 28–9secular, 181staff, 68volunteer, 194

transaction costs, 75transformation, 50, 82, 140,

171–2, 177transport, 3, 100, 168, 172, 176trial and error, 177Trussell Trust, 155, 166trust, 5

charitable, xv, 47, 54, 70, 128, 155culture of, see culture, of trustdeed, 129, 193development, 184development of, 127lack of, 102network of, 119patronage, 192patterns of, 119relationships of, 119, 135

trustee, 8, 48, 59, 76, 106–7, 109,128–9, 150, 152, 166, 200

recruitment. see recruitment oftrustees

unpaid, 128turbulence, 32, 103, 108twelve, the, 51–2

umbrella organization. seeorganization, umbrella

uncertainty, 39, 40, 158, 176–7, 198unecumenical, 97–8unemployment, 166unfreezing / changing / freezing, 178United Reformed Church, 111, 132United Society for the Propagation of

the Gospel, 70United States of America, 10, 31, 50,

54, 56, 58, 61, 121, 146, 199

268 Subject Index

unityChristian, 77, 89, 95–7Eucharistic, 96fundamental, 103in Christ, 91organic, 23organizational, 95–6ultimate, 107

university chaplain. see chaplain,university

unsocial hours, 74urban

change, 172community. see community,

urbanlife, 171mission, 154priority area, 131regeneration, 148, 174

utilitarianethics, 159compliance structure. see

compliance structure

valueschanging, 68–9economic, 159environmental, 161ideals of welfare, 62, 140internalization of, 75of staff member, 69of volunteer, 69, 149organizational, 63, 68, 74–5,

120, 162personal, 69, 148religious, 63, 68, 140, 147, 149, 173secular, 68shared, 123system, 121theological, 92, 140–1

Vatican, 77Vineyard Churches, 78, 183violence, ix, 114, 186voluntary

action, 8, 144–6, 161association, 8, 95, 106, 192congregation as, 198funding, 16. see also congregation,

funding

labour, 63, 128, 147, 149, 199management, 12. see also

management, voluntaryspiritual care as, 83street pastor, 132trustee, 8, 60work, 150

voluntary organization, 7–8as business, 8challenges, 151, 185–7, 194–6charitable status of, 54clergy in, 22contract, 151, 163culture of trust in, 129. see also

culture of trustestablishment of, 173formalization in. see formalizationfunding of, 120–1, 146, 150,

187–8, 194governance of, 150hierarchical, 15hybridization, 151–2isomorphism in, 8, 149, 151. see also

isomorphismmanagement of, 36merger with faith-based

organization, 80national, 16partnership, 8path dependent, 121purpose of, 120rules designed for, 128Salvation Army as, 71secular, 67, 80, 84, 121, 149, 187–8small, 150social action, 67social capital of, 121. see also capital,

socialsocial justice work, 155staff member, 64, 150, 186, 194. see

also staff memberuntidy, 12

voluntary sector, 8, 55, 202academies in, 61appraisal in, 13as mediating institution, 119as secular, 60authority structure internal, x, 42bureaucratization of, 8

Subject Index 269

challenges, 185–7funding, 61housing associations in, 59hybridization in, 150isomorphism in, 8. see also

isomorphismliterature, xiimanager, 8, 64management theory, 62organization. see voluntary

organizationownership by paid staff, 8relationship with congregations, 69,

122, 173–4relationship with faith-based

organizations, 53, 55–7, 60, 64,74, 122, 126, 174, 194, 196

relationships with other sectors,104, 129, 149

relationship with religious sector,123, 126, 169, 187, 192

religious organizations in/not in, 57representative of, 122, 126secular, 120, 149trustee, 64, 76umbrella organization, 8university departments, 202welfare project/role, 120, 146, 148–9see also secular voluntary sector

volunteeras resource, 126chaplain, 85, 100, 109Christian, 126, 144–5, 166, 194–5.

see also Christian volunteeringfemale, 145from secular sector, 64in congregation, 146, 149,

187–8, 200in faith-based organization, 50, 74,

146, 149, 166, 195, 200in hospice, 83in inter-faith forum, 123–4in mission organization, 51in religious organization, 149, 187in secular organization, 107, 122,

144–6leader. see leader, volunteermanagement of, 186–8, 194motivation of, 62

ownership by, 8personal objectives/values of, 69,

74–5, 151, 194recruitment. see recruitment,

volunteerrelationship with client, 59religious, 145, 151, 194–5secular, 64training ofvalues of. see values, of volunteerwelcome, 109

Wandsworth, 148water supply, 157way of being, 150welfare. see social welfare

budget, 129ideals of, 62, 140–1, 150public, 149relationship to social justice, 152spiritual, 148state, 152see also utilitarian ethics

wellbeing, 150, 152Welfare and Religion in a European

Perspective (WREP) researchproject, 141, 156

welfare provision, x, 138buildings for, 147Christian, 144, 146congregational, 2, 113, 144–5, 150,

155, 164contract for, 122, 150, 156faith-based, 120–1, 126, 129, 146,

149, 152, 155, 163–4, 169, 202funding of, 146gap-filling, 156holistic 151material, 156mediator, 148multi-faith, 100non-material, 156religious, 120–1, 126, 129, 136, 141,

146–7, 149–53, 155–6, 202secular, 147State, 136, 148, 156, 167structured, 147–8see also social welfare

whistle-blower, 162

270 Subject Index

widow, 51–2, 114, 140, 144women

as faith community representatives,124–5

clergy, 95Greek, 186group of, 99leading, 185leading on welfare and social

justice, 121–2ministry of, 78Muslim, 99relational work, 153religious orders, 70volunteers, 145

Word/word of God, 51, 90–1, 186,190–1

word and deed, x, 18, 50, 72–3, 76, 80,190, 192

workcaring, 153full-time, routine, 197group, 175, 177–8hard, 4, 177in city, 172in community, 169life balance, 177long hours at, 187multitasking, 177of congregation, 61of minister, 28, 30of missioner, 51paid, 150people into, 166processes, 157–8standardization of, 158

workerautonomous, 175, 197community. see community workerconsultation of, 175economic conditions of, 38franchise, 31housing association, 60local, 176, 194loyalty, 175

overseas, 48task-oriented, 178values of, 74

workingclass. see class, workingconditions, 38, 175group, 135life, quality of, 159team, 197week, 94

workplace chaplain. see chaplain,workplace

workplace chaplaincy, 72see also industrial mission

worshipas charitable, 61as activity and definition of

congregation/religousorganization, x, 1, 18, 30, 33,44–5, 51, 53, 72–3, 80–1, 94, 96,120, 138, 145, 148, 173, 188,190, 192–3

as imperative, x, 13, 44–5, 76, 202cultural adaptation, 77ecumenical, 96–7event, 71, 109–10experiment, 77in new community, 169, 173–4,

181, 183information-rich, 198inter-faith, 98–9, 110location of theology, 96public, 120volunteer labour for, 147words and actions of, 130words of, 130

youngadults, 19, 182people, 26, 72–3, 155, 163

youthclub, 26, 147provision, 163, 182work, 7, 74worker, 31, 163