12
This article was downloaded by: [University of Glasgow] On: 05 October 2013, At: 12:31 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbst20 Biological performance of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), a potential biocontrol agent for the invasive weed Miconia calvescens Elisangela Gomes Fidelis de Morais a , Marcelo Coutinho Picanço a , Robert Weingart Barreto b , Nilson Rodrigues Silva a & Mateus Ribeiro Campos a a Department of Animal Biology b Department of Fitopathology, Federal University of Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, CEP, 36570-000, Brazil Published online: 14 Dec 2009. To cite this article: Elisangela Gomes Fidelis de Morais , Marcelo Coutinho Picanço , Robert Weingart Barreto , Nilson Rodrigues Silva & Mateus Ribeiro Campos (2010) Biological performance of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), a potential biocontrol agent for the invasive weed Miconia calvescens , Biocontrol Science and Technology, 20:1, 107-116, DOI: 10.1080/09583150903428711 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150903428711 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.

Biological performance of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), a potential biocontrol agent for the invasive weed Miconia calvescens

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

This article was downloaded by: [University of Glasgow]On: 05 October 2013, At: 12:31Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Biocontrol Science and TechnologyPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbst20

Biological performance ofDiclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera:Psyllidae), a potential biocontrolagent for the invasive weed MiconiacalvescensElisangela Gomes Fidelis de Morais a , Marcelo Coutinho Picançoa , Robert Weingart Barreto b , Nilson Rodrigues Silva a & MateusRibeiro Campos aa Department of Animal Biologyb Department of Fitopathology, Federal University of Viçosa,36570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, CEP, 36570-000, BrazilPublished online: 14 Dec 2009.

To cite this article: Elisangela Gomes Fidelis de Morais , Marcelo Coutinho Picanço ,Robert Weingart Barreto , Nilson Rodrigues Silva & Mateus Ribeiro Campos (2010) Biologicalperformance of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), a potential biocontrol agent forthe invasive weed Miconia calvescens , Biocontrol Science and Technology, 20:1, 107-116, DOI:10.1080/09583150903428711

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150903428711

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Biological performance of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae),a potential biocontrol agent for the invasive weed Miconia calvescens

Elisangela Gomes Fidelis de Moraisa,*, Marcelo Coutinho Picancoa,

Robert Weingart Barretob, Nilson Rodrigues Silvaa and

Mateus Ribeiro Camposa

aDepartment of Animal Biology, and bDepartment of Fitopathology, Federal University ofVicosa, 36570-000, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, CEP 36570-000, Brazil

(Received 31 March 2009; returned 19 May 2009; accepted 20 October 2009)

Diclidophlebia smithi Burckhardt, Morais and Picanco (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) is apromising biological control agent of Miconia calvescens DC. (Melastomataceae),a neotropical invasive weed in forest ecosystems in French Polynesia and Hawaiiand a threat in Australia, where it was also introduced. A study on thereproductive performance of D. smithi under laboratory conditions through lifeexpectancy and fertility tables is presented. Results indicated that this psyllid hasa high reproductive capacity (R0�1 and rm�0) and a short life cycle (46�47 days)and can have up to nine generations per year. The critical period of its life cycle isduring the nymphal stage which is clearly inadequate for field introductions. Thebest age for introducing D. smithi against M. calvescens is the 4th day of the adultstage. D. smithi is easily mass-reared and has a short life cycle and a highreproductive capacity, which are desirable characteristics for a biological controlagent.

Keywords: psyllid; weed; life tables; mass-rearing; Melastomataceae

Introduction

Miconia calvescens DC. (Melastomataceae) (common names: ‘cancer vert’ and velvet

tree) is among the world’s worst invasive species (International Union for

Conservation of Nature 2008). Invasion by this plant is a threat to several humid

forests ecosystems throughout the world, but impact has been particularly severe on

oceanic islands, such as French Polynesia (Gagne, Loope, Medeiros, and Anderson

1992; Meyer 1996; Medeiros, Loope, Conant, and Mcelvaney 1997), and Hawaii,

(Csurhes 1997). M. calvescens is native to humid tropical forests of Central and

South America, where it is not considered a weed. It is neither abundant nor

common, due to competition with other plant species and heavy damage from its

natural enemies, mainly arthropods and plant pathogens. Numerous insect species

feeding on this plant were found during systematic surveys in selected areas in Brazil

(Picanco et al. 2005; Seixas, Barreto, and Killgore 2007).

Classical biological control is probably the only sustainable way of controlling

these invasive populations. Preliminary surveys of arthropods attacking

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

ISSN 0958-3157 print/ISSN 1360-0478 online

# 2010 Taylor & Francis

DOI: 10.1080/09583150903428711

http://www.informaworld.com

Biocontrol Science and Technology,

Vol. 20, No. 1, 2010, 107�116

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

M. calvescens were conducted in Brazil, Costa Rica and Trinidad from 1993 to 1995

and several arthropods and pathogens were collected and illustrated. Robert

Burkhart, Hawaii Department of Agriculture’s exploratory entomologist involved

in the surveys, was pessimistic about the potential of the many arthropods he found

as biocontrol agents (C. Smith, personal communication) and attention was then

concentrated on the exploitation of pathogens. In 1995, a search for M. calvescens

pathogens native to the neotropics was initialiated. Selected areas in Brazil, Costa

Rica and Ecuador were surveyed and numerous pathogens were found, including a

phytoplasm, two species of nematodes Ditylenchus and one oomycete Pythium sp.

(Seixas, Barreto, and Matsuoka 2002; Seixas, Barreto, Freitas, Maffia, and Monteiro

2004; Seixas et al. 2007).Until recently, only one natural enemy has been released for a classical biological

control of M. calvescens. The fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. miconiae

was introduced into Hawaii in 1997 (Killgore, Sugiyama, and Barreto 1997) and into

French Polynesia in 2001, contributing to the control of miconia to some extent

(particularly in French Polynesia) (Meyer, Taputuarai, and Killgore 2007). There-

fore, it is now clear that additional agents will be required to provide an effective

control of this weed.

In the early 2000s, there was renewed interest in arthropod natural enemies of

miconia and more intensive surveys were performed both in Brazil (Burckhardt,

Morais, and Picanco 2006) and in Costa Rica. Coincidentally, among the numerous

insect species collected on miconia in both countries were two closely related species

of psyllids: Diclidophlebia smithi Burckhardt, Morais and Picanco (Hemiptera:

Psyllidae) in Brazil (Burckhardt et al. 2006) and D. lucens Burckhardt, Hanson and

Madrigal in Costa Rica (Burckhardt, Hanson, and Madrigal 2005). Psyllid species

initially were regarded as among the most promising agents to be used against this

weed (Picanco et al. 2005; Burckhardt et al. 2006).

Diclidophlebia smithi is a new species recently described by Burckhardt et al.

(2006) and then selected for further studies. This psyllid is a member of the possibly

monophyletic species group associated with Melastomataceae and appears to be

widely distributed in south-eastern Brazil. Specificity tests demonstrate that D.

smithi is unable to develop on any of the Melastomataceae species: Clidemia

capitellata, C. hirta, Miconia mendoncaii, M. albicans, M. ibaguenscens, Leandra

lacunosa, Ossala confertiflora, Tibouchina granulosa and T. moricandiana. In

addition, D. smithi colonies were found on plants neighboring M. calvescens plants

in the forests of Dionısio, Guaraciaba and Vicosa. This species was found in

Dionısio, Guaraciaba and Vicosa (state of Minas Gerais) and also in Mangaratiba

and Ilha Grande � Angra dos Reis (state of Rio de Janeiro) (Burckhardt et al. 2006).

After an insect has been identified as a potential biological control agent, life

history studies are necessary (Harley and Forno 1992). Life tables are used as tools

for evaluating a potential biological control agent. From life history studies it is

possible to elucidate the development, survival and fertility patterns of the insects.

Constructing life tables is an important aid for understanding the insect’s population

dynamics. They also provide data on a population’s mortality and survival rates.

Fertility life tables provide a way to express, in numeric form, the main

characteristics of the specific mortality for each age (Rabinovich 1978), and the

reproductive capacity of a population (Price 1997). From life tables, it is possible to

108 E.G.F. de Morais et al.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

determine the best age for introducing a natural enemy and the critical periods in its

life cycle.

This paper includes part of the results of the investigation conducted with

D. smithi in Brazil and focuses on the reproductive performance of this psyllidthrough life expectancy and fertility tables.

Materials and methods

Life and fertility life table data of D. smithi were obtained during two generations,

the first was from September 3 to October 20, 2005 and the second was from July 24

to September 8, 2006. Studies were performed in a rearing room of the ‘Laboratorio

de Manejo Integrado de Pragas’ of the Universidade Federal de Vicosa. During theexperiments, air temperature, relative humidity and photoperiod were not controlled

but were monitored daily. Although the environment in rearing room was not

controlled, it did not vary much. The rearing room was under natural light and the

photoperiod was calculated using an equation that relates sun declination and

latitude (Smithsonian Institution 1963). Mean environmental conditions during the

first generation of studies were: 20.490.38C, relative humidity 77.391.2% and

photoperiod 12.190.04 h light. For the second generation they were: 17.690.38C,

relative humidity 7991.0% and photoperiod 11.390.03 h light.Twenty pairs of day-old D. smithi were placed on five M. calvescens seedlings

(four pairs per seedling). These seedlings were 80�100 cm tall and were from seeds

which were collected in the field and germinated in a box with sand. When seedlings

were more or less 10 cm tall, they were transplanted to pots full of soil with a

capacity of five liters. Before transplanting, each pot received 50 g of 4-14-8 mineral

fertilizer (N-P-K) and these seedlings were irrigated daily.

Adults of D. smithi were obtained from nymphs collected from the field and

maintained on M. calvescens seedlings until adult emergence. The number of eggs,females and males were counted daily and the hatching rate was also evaluated.

Thirty emergent nymphs were individually transferred with a thin brush to buds

collected from mature M. calvescens plants in the field. These buds were maintained

with their petioles immersed in glass dishes containing 100 mL of water distiled. The

majority of these buds remained in good condition throughout the study but in case

a bud senesced; nymphs were transferred to fresh organs. The instar of each nymph

and their survival were recorded daily. The eggs and the nymphs of first and second

instars were counted with the aid of a hand magnifying glass at 10� magnification.Instar development was determined by the presence of exuviae, nymphal

coloration (usually yellow after ecdysis) and size (data given in Burckhardt et al.

2006). Young adults were sexed and sex ratio was determined. Females and males

were easily separated because females have a visible ovipositor on the end of

abdomen and are larger.

Life expectancy and fertility life tables

Life expectancy tables were constructed from the survival data, according to the

methods described by Southwood and Henderson (2000) and Price (1997). Graphs

of life expectancy (ex) and mortality (100qx) over time (days) for each life cycle

studied were prepared with the life expectancy tables.

Biocontrol Science and Technology 109

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

Fertility tables were constructed according to the procedure described by

Southwood and Henderson (2000) and Price (1997). Regression analysis of survival

and reproductive rate over time (days) were made separately for both life cycles.

Results

Generation time (T) of D. smithi was 37.69 days during the first generation and

35.54 days in the second. The time necessary for the population, starting from adults,

to double in number was 9.75 days in the first generation and 7.86 in the second

(Table 1).

Table 1. Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) fertility life table in the first and second

generations, in Vicosa (state of Minas Gerais, Brazil).

Stage x lx mx mxlx xmxlx

First life cycle

Egg

0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

First instar9 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00

11 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00

Second instar12 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00

14 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00

Third instar15 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00

18 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fourth instar19 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00

22 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fifth instar26 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00

30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00

Adult

31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00

33 0.37 0.69 0.25 8.38

34 0.37 3.08 1.13 38.36

37 0.37 6.92 2.54 93.92

39 0.37 4.00 1.47 57.20

42 0.37 0.85 0.31 13.03

45 0.33 0.17 0.06 2.54

47 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00

GRR�39.78, R0�14.58, T�37.69 days, DT�9.75 days, rm�0.07 and l�1.07

Second life cycle

Egg0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

First instar8 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

11 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00

110 E.G.F. de Morais et al.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

Diclidophlebia smithi began to lay eggs at 33 days of age in the first generation

and at 31 days in second generation. The gross reproductive rate (GRR) was higher

in the second generation (47.46 females/female) as compared to the first (39.78

females/female). Net reproductive rate (R0), which represents how much the

population increased during a generation, was also higher in the second generation

(22.97) compared to the first (14.58) (Table 1).

The intrinsic (rm) and finite rates of increase (l) were 0.07 and 1.07 during the

first generation and 0.09 and 1.09 in the second, respectively. These values of l�1

indicate the population was increasing. In other words, it means that the birth rate

was higher than the death rate in the population (Table 1).The survival curve of D. smithi had four phases in both generatons. The first

phase occurred during the egg stage and began at the first instar, when there was no

mortality observed. This phase lasted until the 8th day in the first generation and 9th

day in the second. Mortality between the first and second phases was due to the

failure of egg eclosion (8%). The second phase corresponded to the first, second,

third and fourth instars, when survival rate was 37% of individuals in the first

generation (lx�2.5�0.32x�0.02x2�0.0004x3, R2�0.98, F�262.6, pB0.0001)

and 53% in the second (lx�1.95�0.16x�0.07x2�0.0001x3, R2�0.96, F�92.96,

pB0.0001). This phase lasted from the 8th to the 25th day in the first generation and

from the 9th to the 23rd day in the second. The third phase corresponded to the fifth

instar and half the adult stage, when mortality was zero. This phase lasted from the

Table 1. (Continued).

Stage x lx mx mxlx xmxlx

Second instar12 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00

14 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00

Third instar15 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00

18 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fourth instar19 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00

22 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fifth instar23 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00

26 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00

28 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00

Adult

29 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00

31 0.52 0.20 0.10 3.22

32 0.52 4.00 2.08 66.56

35 0.52 8.00 4.16 145.60

38 0.48 5.00 2.40 91.20

41 0.20 1.00 0.20 8.20

43 0.14 0.46 0.06 2.75

46 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00

GRR�47.46, R0�22.97, T�35.54 days, DT�7.86 days, rm�0.09 and l�1.09

x�Age (days). Lx�Number of surviving females in the beginning of each x. mx�Number of femaleprogeny per female in interval of age x. GRR� Gross reproductiverate. R0�Net reproductive rate.T�Generation time (days). DT� Necessary time for the population to double in number of individuals(days). rm�Intrinsic rate of increase. l�Finite rate of increase.

Biocontrol Science and Technology 111

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

25th to 44th day in first generation and from the 23rd to 37th day in the second. The

fourth round corresponded to the end of the adult stage, when after the 44th day in

the first generation (lx�4.8�0.1x, R2�0.97, F�84.4, pB0.0027) and the 37th day

in the second generation (lx�8.85�0.36x�0.04x2, R2�0.97, F�154.21, pB

0.0001) all individuals died (Figure 1).Oviposition by female D. smithi in the first generation commenced on the

31st day and finished on the 45th day, with the highest oviposition on the 37th

day (/mx�6:43e(�0:5((x�37:11)=2:39)2); R2�0.91, F�68.27, pB0.0001). In the second

Figure 1. Survival rate (lx) and cumulative number of female eggs.female�1 day�1 (mx) of

Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) during its first (A) and second generations (B).

Vicosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

112 E.G.F. de Morais et al.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

generation, oviposition occurred from the 29th to 45th day and the highest

egg deposition was on the 35th day (/mx�6:73e(�0:5((x�35:41)=2:89)2); R2�0.90,

F�31.35, pB0.0001). Survival curves and reproduction rate intercepted

on the 34th day in the first generation and the 32nd day in the second generation.

This corresponded to the fourth day after adult emergence in both generations

(Figure 2).

Diclidophlebia smithi exhibited its highest mortality during the fourth instar in

both generations, and this is considered as the critical period (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Life expectancy (ex) and mortality (100qx) of Diclidophlebia smithi (Hemiptera:

Psyllidae) during its first (A) and second generations (B). Vicosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Biocontrol Science and Technology 113

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

Discussion

Life table parameters obtained in this study provide useful information on the

biology and the biocontrol potential of the psyllid D. smithi. Reproductive

parameters obtained from both fertility life tables of D. smithi (R0�1 and rm�0)

showed that this species has a high potential for population growth in areas of

intended introduction for biological control of M. calvescens. This psyllid can

increase its population size 110�147 times during a year. Time necessary for the

population to double in number (DT) also indicated that even in milder seasons, this

psyllid can produce up to nine generations within a year. Other studies have shown

the reproductive capacity of psyllids generally is extremely high (e.g., Mehrnejad

2001; Mehrnejad and Copland 2005; Center et al. 2006), which is a positive factor

that can lead to success in weed biological control. The high reproductive potential is

also a cause of difficulty for control of pest psyllids (e.g., Mehrnejad 2001). The high

reproductive capacity of psyllids has contributed to success of this insect group in

biological control of weeds (e.g., Center et al. 2006; Shaw, Bryner, and Tanner 2009).

As the rate of population increase is considered the main determinant in the

establishment and invasion success of a biological control agent (Crawley 1986),

these results show that D. smithi may have a great chance to establish in new areas.

These biological parameters were obtained during cool temperatures (at 17�218C), therefore, the performance of D. smithi could be better at higher temperatures,

since the optimum temperature range for psyllids is betwewen 22 and 288C (Kapatos

and Stratopoulou 1999; Liu and Tsai 2000; Fung and Chen 2006). In Hawaii for

example, air temperatures are cool the entire year, with a median of 258C during the

summer and 228C in winter. It is therefore probable that D. smithi will establish easily

in these areas.

Our results identify the nymphal stage as a critical phase with high mortality.

This information should be useful for evaluating the potential for mass-rearing and

anticipating the potential population growth in the field (Southwood and Henderson

2000; Diaz, Overholt, Cuda, Pratt, and Fox 2008).

The best time for releasing an insect is another aspect to be considered in

biocontrol programs. Releases should be conducted when the insect exhibits high

dispersal and reproductive capacity and also at a stage of low mortality. The

intersection point of fertility (mx) and survival rate (lx) curves provides a good

indicator of the best time for agent release in the field. Therefore, the best age for

introduction of D. smithi for controlling M. calvescens should then be 4-day-old

adults, because at this stage females have a high reproductive rate, are mature, able to

fly and mortality is also low. Eggs laid have a high hatching rate, which will then

produce a large number of nymphs. Center et al. (2006) demonstrated that the psyllid

Boreioglycaspis melaleucae has a high dispersion capacity in the field, with a rate

ranging of 10 km/year. Therefore, as D. smithi has a high reproductive capacity, it is

possible that this species will establish in introduced areas.

Although mass-rearing is not a critical issue for the use of D. smithi as a

biocontrol agent (since the approach here is not inundative but instead classical), this

insect is easy to rear. Mass rearing is essential for the host range tests in quarantine.

The methodology for raising this psyllid was very simple and low cost, and a single

miconia seedling can produce a great number of psyllids (Morais, personal

observation).

114 E.G.F. de Morais et al.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

In summary, D. smithi exhibited a high biotic potential with a short life cycle and

can be easily mass-reared. These characteristics are very favorable for this psyllid as a

potential biological control agent for M. calvescens.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by USGS BRD Pacific Island Ecosystem Research Centre, NationalPark Service, the Research Corporation of Hawaii and the Conselho Nacional deDesenvolvimento Cientıfico e Tecnologico (CNPq). Dr C. Smith (RCUH, University ofHawaii) is thanked for his continuous support and encouragement. We also thank JeffreyRyan Oar, from Oregon State University, for the English revision of the text.

References

Burckhardt, D., Hanson, P., and Madrigal, L. (2005), ‘Diclidophlebia lucens, N. sp (Hemiptera:Psyllidae) from Costa Rica, a Potential Control Agent of Miconia calvescens (Melastoma-taceae) in Hawaii’, Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 107, 741�749.

Burckhardt, D., Morais, E.G.F., and Picanco, M.C. (2006), ‘Diclidophlebia smithi sp. n., a NewSpecies of Jumping Plant-Lice (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) from Brazil Associated with Miconiacalvescens (Melastomataceae)’, Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen EntomologischenGesellschaft, 79, 241�250.

Center, T.D., Pratt, P.D., Tipping, P.W., Rayamajhi, M.B., Van, T.K., Wineriter, S.A., Dray,F.A., and Purcell, M. (2006), ‘Field Colonization, Population Growth, and Dispersal ofBoreioglycaspis melaleucae Moore, a Biological Control Agent of the Invasive TreeMelaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake’, Biological Control, 39, 363�374.

Crawley, M.J. (1986), ‘The Population Biology of Invaders’, Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London, 314, 711�731.

Csurhes, S.M. (1997), ‘Miconia calvescens, a Potentially Invasive Plant in Australia’s Tropicaland Sub-Tropical Rainforests’, in First Regional Conference on Miconia Control, pp. 72�77.

Diaz, R., Overholt, W.A., Cuda, J.P., Pratt, P.D., and Fox, A. (2008), ‘Temperature-dependentDevelopment, Survival, and Potential Distribution of Ischnodemus variegatus (Hemiptera:Blissidae), a Herbivore of West Indian Marsh Grass’, Annals of the Entomological Society ofAmerica, 101, 604�612.

Gagne, B.H., Loope, L.L., Medeiros, A.C., and Anderson, S.J. (1992), ‘Miconia calvescens: AThreat to Native Forests in the Hawaiian Islands’, Pacific Science, 46, 390�391.

Harley, K.L.S., and Forno, I.W. (1992), Biological Control of Weeds: A Handbook forPractioners and Students, Brisbane: CSIRO-Division of Entomology.

International Union for Conservation of Nature (2008), ‘100 of the World’s Worst InvasiveAlien Species’. www.issg.org/booklet.pdf.

Kapatos, E.T., and Stratopoulou, E.T. (1999), ‘Duration Times of the Immature Stages ofCacopsylla pyri L. (Hom., Psyllidae), Estimated under Field Conditions, and TheirRelationship to Ambient Temperature’, Journal of Applied Entomology, 123, 555�559.

Killgore, E.M., Sugiyama, L.S., and Barreto, R.W. (1997), ‘Prospective Biological Control ofMiconia calvescens in Hawai’i with a Non-Indigenous Fungus Colletotrichum gloeospor-ioides. f.sp. miconiae’, in Proceedings of the First Regional Conference on Miconia Control,pp. 65�71.

Liu, Y.H., and Tsai, J.H. (2000), ‘Effects of Temperature on Biology and Life Table Parametersof the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae)’, Annals of AppliedBiology, 137, 201�206.

Medeiros, A.C., Loope, L.L., Conant, P., and Mcelvaney, S. (1997), ‘Status, Ecology, andManagement of the Invasive Plant, Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae) in theHawaiian Islands’, Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 48, 23�36.

Mehrnejad, M.R. (2001), ‘The Current Status of Pistachio Pests in Iran’, Cahiers OptionsMediterraneennes, 56, 315�322.

Mehrnejad, M.R., and Copland, M.J.W. (2005), ‘The Seasonal Forms and ReproductivePotential of the Common Pistachio Psylla, Agonoscena pistaciae (Hem., Psylloidea)’,Journal of Applied Entomology, 129, 342�346.

Biocontrol Science and Technology 115

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3

Meyer, J.Y. (1996), ‘Status of Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae), a Dominant InvasiveTree in the Society Islands (French Polynesia)’, Pacific Science, 50, 66�76.

Meyer, J.Y., Taputuarai R., and Killgore E. (2007), ‘Dissemination and Impacts of the FungalPathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. miconiae (Deuteromycetinae) on the InvasiveAlien Tree Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae) in the Rainforests of Tahiti (FrenchPolynesia, South Pacific)’, in Proceedings XII International Symposium on Biological Controlof Weeds, pp. 594�600.

Picanco, M.C., Barreto, R.W., Fidelis, E.G., Semeao, A.A., Rosado, J.F., Moreno, S.C.,Barros, E.C., Silva, G.A., and Johnson, T. (2005), ‘Biological Control of Miconia calvescensby Phytophagous Arthropods’, Technical Report 134, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit,University of Hawai’i.

Price, P.W. (1997), Insect Ecology, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Rabinovich, J.E. (1978), Ecologia de Poplaciones Animales, Washington, DC: Secretaria

General de la Organizacion de los Estados Americanos.Seixas, C.D.S., Barreto, R.W., and Matsuoka, K. (2002), ‘First Report of a Phytoplasma-

associated Witches Broom Disease of Miconia calvescens in Brazil’, Plant Pathology, 5, 801.Seixas, C.D.S., Barreto, R.W., Freitas, L.G., Maffia, L.A., and Monteiro, F.T. (2004),

‘Ditylenchus drepanocercus (Nematoda), a Potential Biological Control Agent for Miconiacalvescens (Melastomataceae): Host-specificity and Epidemiology’, Biological Control, 31,29�37.

Seixas, C.D.S., Barreto, R.W., and Killgore, E. (2007), ‘Fungal Pathogens of Miconiacalvescens (Melastomataceae) from Brazil, with Reference to Classical Biological Control’,Mycologia, 99, 99�111.

Shaw, R.H., Bryner, S., and Tanner, R. (2009), ‘The Life History and Host Range of theJapanese Knotweed Psyllid, Aphalara itadori Shinji: Potentially the First ClassicalBiological Weed Control Agent for the European Union’, Biological Control, 49, 105�113.

Smithsonian Institution (1963), Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, Washington, DC:Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections.

Southwood, T.R.E., and Henderson, P.A. (2000), Ecological Methods, with ParticularReference to the Study of Insect Populations, Oxford: Blackwell Science.

116 E.G.F. de Morais et al.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f G

lasg

ow]

at 1

2:31

05

Oct

ober

201

3