bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

    1/5

  • 8/7/2019 bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

    2/5

    1988

    Table 1. Steady state analysis of acetic acid fermentation by shaking bioreactor system equipped with twin ceramic membranes

    under various conditions.

    Dilution Aeration PO2 Shaking Outlet (g l1) Productivity Cell conc. Filtration flux

    rate (1/h) rate (vvm) (atm) rate (rpm) Ethanol Acetic acid (g l1 h1) (g l1) (ml h1 cm2)

    0.093 0.5 0.21 130 4.53 31 2.88 0.82 0.22

    0.2 0.5 0.21 130 18.5 13.3 2.66 0.93 0.8

    0.2 1 0.21 130 15.8 15.4 3.08 1.24 0.8

    0.2 1.5 0.21 130 14.4 17.2 3.44 1.66 0.8

    0.2 1.75 0.21 130 14.4 17 3.40 1.81 0.8

    0.2 1.75 0.21 230 1.97 34.1 6.82 2.38 0.8

    0.375 1.75 0.21 230 14.5 18.5 6.94 3.22 1.5

    0.375 2 0.3 230 7.22 28.5 10.7 4.32 1.5

    0.375 2 0.4 230 3.18 34.1 12.8 2.31 1.5

    0.481 2 0.4 230 8.01 27.9 13.4 3.33 1.92

    Materials and methods

    Bacterial strain, medium and analytical procedure

    Acetobacter pasteurianus, which was kindly pro-

    vided by the Hokkaido Industrial Technology Center,

    was used for the acetic acid fermentation (Miyazaki

    et al. 1996). It was grown on medium with the

    following composition: (g l1 demineralized water)

    ethanol 31.6, glucose 5, yeast extract 2.5, Polypep-

    ton 5. Ethanol was aseptically added to the autoclaved

    medium.

    A sample from the SBTCM system was cen-

    trifuged at 4 C, 7000 g, for 6 min. The supernatant

    was used to determine the glucose, ethanol and aceticacid concentrations by HPLC. The cell concentration

    was determined turbidomedically at 660 nm; one unit

    of OD660 corresponded to about 0.4 g dry cells l1.

    The CO2 content of the exhaust gas was analyzed

    by a gas chromatograph equipped with a thermal

    conductivity detector.

    Shaking bioreactor with a twin ceramic membranes

    (SBTCM) system

    Figure 1 is a schematic outline of the experimental

    SBTCM system. Two cylindrical alumina ceramic fil-

    ters (type MF-0.2 m, NGK Co., Ltd, Nagoya, Japan)

    were fitted in parallel at the shoulder of a 500 ml glass

    shaking flask. The working volume was 200 ml. The

    ceramic filter is made of Al2O3 with a mean pore size

    of 0.2 m and 0.2 mm at the outer and inner surfaces,

    respectively. The inner and outer diameters, and the

    length were 8 mm, 11 mm and 150 mm, respectively.

    The effective surface area was 50 cm2 for each filter.

    The medium feed line and product line were linked tothe flask from pump 1 and pump 2 via valve 1 and

    valve 2.

    Figure 2 shows the line arrangement of twin ce-

    ramic filters of the SBTCM system. When valve 1 is

    open and valve 2 is closed, the filter B is used for sub-

    strate feeding (back-washing) and the filter A works

    for broth filtration. When the medium flows from the

    inside to the outside of the ceramic filter, it also works

    to back-wash the filter surface. When valve 1 is closed

    and valve 2 is opened, filter B is used for filtration and

    filter A is for medium feed (back-washing). By repeat-

    ing this operation at certain intervals, simultaneous

    substrate feed and filter back-washing is possible. The

    filtration flux has to be the same as the back-washing

    flux of membrane because the medium feed rate is the

    same as the broth withdrawal rate. The valve operation

    was conducted manually.

    The flask was shaken on a reciprocal shaker be-

    tween 130 and 230 rpm. The SBTCM system was

    autoclaved for 30 min at 120 C and then used for the

    experiments. The culture temperature was maintained

    at 30 C and the complex medium was continuously

    fed at various feed rates. Aseptic air was also sup-

    plied from the top; the supply rate was modified in

    proportion to the medium feed rate so as to main-tain an aerobic condition. O2-enriched air with a 40%

    O2 content was also used. The culture pH was not

    controlled.

    The volumetric O2 transfer rate (OTR, mg

    O2 l1 h1) was stoichiometrically calculated (1 mol

    O2 required for 1 mol acetic acid production by Ace-

  • 8/7/2019 bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

    3/5

    1989

    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a shaking bioreactor system equipped with twin ceramic membranes.

    Fig. 2. Line arrangement of twin ceramic filters in a shaking bioreactor system equipped with twin ceramic membranes.

    tobacter, no CO2 production, trace by-products, and

    low biomass production) based on the acetic acid

    productivity (P).

    OTR = P (32/60) 103.

    The overall O2 transfer coefficient, kL (h

    1), was es-

    timated based on the following equation, assuming a

    steady state:

    k

    L=

    O2 consumed/DO gradient=

    OTR/(DO

    DO

    r

    ).DO and DOr denote the saturated dissolved O2 con-

    centration at 30 C and the O2 concentration in the

    culture broth, respectively.

    Results and discussion

    First, the performance and operational stability during

    the long-term operation of the SBTCM system were

    examined. Figure 3 shows the operating results of the

    SBTCM system. Fermentation was commenced at a

    dilution rate of 0.093 h1 with a reciprocation rate

    of 130 rpm. The interval for switching the flow di-

    rection was 12 h in this run based on repeated trials

    so as to maintain the membrane filtration ability. Af-ter inoculation, the acetic acid concentration linearly

    increased and no cells were observed in the prod-

    uct after filtration. After confirming the establishment

    of a steady state, the dilution rate was stepwise in-

    creased as shown in Figure 3. The aeration rate was

    increased along with the increase in the dilution rate.

  • 8/7/2019 bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

    4/5

    1990

    Fig. 3. Performance and long-term stability of a shaking bioreactor

    system equipped with twin ceramic membranes for acetic acid fer-

    mentation. (a) Aeration rate (vvm), (b) dilution rate (h1), (c) cell

    conc. (mg l1), (d) productivity (g l1 h1), (e) ethanol () and

    acetic acid () concentrations in filtrate.

    Operation was stable and no process malfunction oc-

    curred. The filtration rate was successfully maintained

    and no clogging of the ceramic membrane occurred

    during the operation. At around 500 h, since it was

    considered that the productivity was limited by O2transfer, the shaking rate was increased from 130 rpm

    to 230 rpm to enhance the O2 supply, leading to a

    significant increase in the productivity. The maximum

    productivity finally reached about 10.7 g l1 h1 with

    a dilution rate of 0.375 h1 with 30% O2 enriched

    air. The operation of the reactor continued for about

    800 h. Cell concentration in the culture broth finally

    reached 5.2 g l1. The total filtration volume during800 h operation was approximately 33 700 ml, which

    was 170-fold of the initial volume (200 ml). The acetic

    acid yield over the theoretical acetic acid concentra-

    tion stoichiometorically calculated from the amount of

    ethanol consumed was about 0.85 (w/w). Product of

    the SBTCM system is cell free and no further treat-

    Fig. 4. Operating results of a shaking bioreactor system equipped

    with twin ceramic membranes under high dilution rate conditions.

    (a) Aeration rate (vvm), (b) dilution rate (h1), (c) cell conc.

    (mg l1), (d) productivity (g l1 h1), (e) ethanol () and acetic

    acid () concentrations in filtrate.

    ment is required to remove cells of the culture broth.

    This will be beneficial for the commercial productionof soluble products.

    Then, the process performance under high dilu-

    tion rate conditions of the SBTCM system was in-

    vestigated. Figure 4 shows the results. The shaking

    speed was 230 rpm and the interval for switching the

    flow direction was 12 h in this run. After seeding,

    as the dilution rate was raised, the residual ethanol

    concentration increased. The dilution rate was in-

    creased to 0.375 h1 at 87 h with the supply of

    O2-enriched air. Productivity was drastically increased

    to 12.8 g l1 h1 at a dilution rate of 0.375 h1 and

    13.4 g l

    1

    h

    1

    at a dilution rate of 0.481 h

    1

    , re-spectively. An increase in the PO2 clearly increased

    the productivity, which suggested that O2 transfer is

    the rate-limiting step of acetic acid fermentation. Op-

    eration was also stable and cell concentration during

    cultivation was around 3.2 g l1.

    These results indicate that the medium feeding

    flow through the membrane successfully wash the sur-

  • 8/7/2019 bioreactor cu membrane ceramice

    5/5

    1991

    face of the membrane and was effective to maintain

    the filtration ability of the membrane. About 2 h back-

    washing process using pure water was required every

    24 h to avoid the clogging of the membrane in a

    shaking bioreactor with a single ceramic membrane;

    this contributes to the improvement of total process

    performance.The steady-state analysis for both runs is summa-

    rized in Table 1. The overall O2 transfer rate, kL was

    estimated to be around 700 h1 (PO2:0.21, shaking

    rate: 230 rpm, 1.75 vvm). The filtration fluxes, which

    are the same as the back-washing fluxes of the mem-

    branes, were between 0.22 to 1.92 (ml h1 cm2).

    These were similar values in previous studies and

    sufficient for successful recovery of membrane perme-

    ation ability.

    In our previous study (Horiuchi et al. 2000), we

    reported the performance of a packed bed bioreactor

    using charcoal pellets for the acetic acid production

    using the same bacterial strain under similar experi-

    mental conditions, in which the maximum acetic acid

    productivity was about 3.9 g l1 h1 using normal

    aeration and 6.5 g l1 h1 using air enriched with 40%

    O2. The maximum productivity obtained in this study

    was almost double compared with the results in our

    previous study.

    Ghommidh et al. (1982) employed a ceramic

    monolith in a packed bed bioreactor and obtained a

    productivity of 10.4 g l1 h1 with 20 g acetic acid l1

    by supplying pure oxygen. Kondo et al. (1988) also

    used a ceramic monolith in a packed bed bioreactor

    and obtained a productivity of 4.37 g l1

    h1

    with39 g acetic acid l1. Sueki et al. (1991) examined

    the use of Aphrocell (a porous ceramics) as a packing

    material for acetic acid production. They obtained a

    productivity of 6.5 g l1 h1 of productivity with 53 g

    acetic acid l1 under 90% oxygen-enriched air supply.

    When compared with the results described above, pro-

    ductivity of 12.8 g l1 h1 with 34.1 g acetic acid l1

    and 13.4 g l1 h1 with 27.9 g acetic acid l1 under

    the supply of O2-enriched (40%) air in our study are

    considered to be quite competitive.

    The operation periods used in this study do

    not necessarily mean they are maximum operation

    periods of the system because they were terminated

    due to the experimental limitation by manual opera-

    tion. Therefore, the operation period could be pro-

    longed by operational improvements. However, the

    operation of the shaking bioreactor system is more

    complicated compared with that of the packed bed

    bioreactor. Automatic control system will be effectiveand essential for longer operation and practical ap-

    plication of the system. In particular, DO control for

    optimal aeration, periodical medium flow change and

    automatic excessive cell withdrawal for prevention of

    membrane clogging will contribute to improving its

    process performance. Further investigation is required

    to clarify these points.

    References

    Bchs J (2001) Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken

    cultures. Biochem. Eng. J. 7: 9198.Ghommidh C, Navarro JM, Durand G (1982) A study of acetic acid

    production by immobilized Acetobacter cells: oxygen transfer.

    Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24: 605617.

    Horiuchi J, Tabata K, Kanno T, Kobayashi M (2000) Continuous

    acetic acid production by a packed bed bioreactor employ-

    ing charcoal pellets derived from waste mushroom medium. J.

    Biosci. Bioeng. 89: 126130.

    Kamoshita Y, Suzuki T, Ohashi R (1997) A dense cell culture system

    for aerobic microorganisms using a shaken ceramic membrane

    flask with surface aeration. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 85: 218222.

    Kondo M, Suzuki Y, Kato H (1988) Vinegar production by Ace-

    tobacter cells immobilized on ceramic honeycomb monolith.

    Hakkokogaku 66: 393399.

    Miyazaki S, Otsubo M, Aoki H, Sawaya T (1996) Acetic acid

    fermentation with quince, asparagus using isolated acetic acid

    bacteria. Nihon Shokuhin Kagaku Kougaku Kaishi 43: 858865.Ohashi R, Mochizuki E, Suzuki T (1998) High-level expression of

    the methanol-inducible -galactosidase gene by perfusion cul-

    ture of recombinatant Pichia pastoris using a shaken ceramic

    membrane flask. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 86: 4449.

    Sueki M, Kobayashi N, Suzuki A (1991) Continuous acetic acid pro-

    duction by the bioreactor system loading a new ceramic carrier

    for microbial attachment. Biotechnol. Lett. 13: 185190.

    Suzuki T, Kamoshita Y, Ohashi R (1997) A dense cell culture system

    for microorganisms using a shake flask incorporating a porous

    ceramic filter. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 84: 133137.