BOND SCHOENECK &KING · 2011-04-19 · submersible pump (no water injection, simply pumping brine out of the cavern), and well 52 was the withdrawal well. With water injection mostly

BOND SCHOENECK &KING

One Lincoln Center I Syracuse, NY 13202-13551 bsk.com

April 19, 2011

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Peter Briggs, Director New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation Division of Mineral Resources Bureau of Oil & Gas Permitting and Management 625 Broadway, 3rd Floor Albany, NY 12233-6500

Re: Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC, Schuyler County Response to Third Notice of Incomplete Application

Dear Peter:

KEVIN M. BERNSTEIN, ESQ. [email protected]

P: 315.218.8329 F: 315.218.8429

Enclosed please find our response to the Department's March 28, 2011 Third Notice of Incomplete Application regarding Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC's Underground Storage Application.

We would appreciate the Department's prompt review so that completeness of Finger Lakes' Underground Storage Application can coincide with completeness of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.

Please note that the information provided with this transmittal and the information contained in the Response contain confidential information or confidential and/or proprietary, trade secret or business information and should be treated as privileged and confidential and should not be released pursuant to the provisions of 6 NYCRR § 616.7. See attached table for more specifics in this regard.

A Professional Limited Liability Company

Peter Briggs, Director April 19, 2011 Page 2

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Sincerely,

BOND,CHOENECK & KING, PLLC

!~~ Kevin M. Bernstein

Enclosures

cc: Linda Collart/William Glynn, NYSDEC David Bimber, NYSDEC Dr. Langhorne Smith, NYSGS Jennifer Maglienti, Esq., NYSDEC Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC

(w/enclosure) (w/enclosure) (w/enclosure) (w/enclosure) (w/enclosure)

via Federal Express via Federal Express via Federal Express via Federal Express via Federal Express

Document

Response to NOIA

Sections:

FINGER LAKES LPG STORAGE, LLC RESPONSE TO DEC MARCH 28, 2011

THIRD NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION April 19, 2011

REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Confidential Status Soue;ht?

Basis

Financial Status/Transfer of Well Plugging No Responsibilities

Maps Yes Information regarding cavern specifics, internally maintained productions records, cavern evaluation data and logs, historic brinefield maps, bond logs and revised Gallery Maps are critical infrastructure and confidential commercial information under 6 NYCRR §§ 616.7(c)(2)(i)(b) and (c), 616.7(c)(2)(ii), 616.7(c)(2)(iv), (v) and (vi). In addition, information ofthis type has been determined by the DEC to be confidential in previous determinations.

Reservoir Suitability Report (including Yes Same reason as above. attachments)

Well Status and Condition Report (including Yes Same reason as above. attachments)

1835734.1

FLV\,ger LIA~es LPCf stort1tge, LLC

FLV1vgeV" LaR.es L'PCf stoV"age FacLlLtt:j R.eadLV1vg, New yoV"R.

R.es-poV1vse to D5C MaV"cVi 2r?, 20ii TVILV"d NotLce of I VlvCOVvl-plete A-p-plLcatLOVlv

' C'<\ 2 0 ')~)1 ··-1 LVl r.1 .

Response of Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC to DEC's March 28, 2011 Third Notice of Incomplete Application ("NOIA") ==============================================

Financial Securityffransfer of Well Plugging Responsibilities

DEC Comment 1. A Request For Well Transfer with appropriate financial security held by the Department is required for any project well not currently in the applicant's name (e.g., Well 58, API 31-097- 21467-00-01). Adequate financial security must also be in place for any newly proposed well(s).

Finger Lakes Response: A signed Request for Well Transfer was attached to our May 14, 2010 in response to DEC's January 11, 2010 Notice of Incomplete Application. We have been advised by Jenna Datt of the Department that whether well 58 is owned by US Salt, as it is now, or Finger Lakes, as it will be after transfer, there is adequate room in the blanket bonds in place with the Department. If not, we will provide any additional financial security that is required immediately.

Map(s)

The following issues remain and must be addressed concerning Finger Lakes ' Gallery Map (Exhibit A):

DEC Comment 1. Revised pillar width between Finger Lakes Gallery 1 and International Gallery 10: Finger Lakes states that on the original gallery map "the north direction was incorrectly pointed towards the west (upper right corner of the original map) which moved the well orientation more towards the west" and that this was the reason for the pillar width increase between proposed Finger Lakes Gallery I and International Gallery I 0. It is understood how this affected cavern orientations and affected the pillar width. However, the distance between wells 44 and 52 also appears to have increased from the original map to the current map but no explanation for this change was provided by Finger Lakes. Please explain why the distance between the wells changed from the original map to the revised map. Is this the result of recent remapping of the brine field? If so, what resurveyed well locations were incorporated into current Exhibit A?

Finger Lakes Response: The distance between wells 44 and 52 was not specifically shown on the gallery map. However, we do have GPS latitude/longitude coordinates for these two wells (see Attachment A). Our surveyors (C. T Male Associates) advise that based on a review of these coordinates, the distance between these two wells is 472. 6 feet. This distance is reflected on the most recent version of the Gallery Map.

DEC Comment 2. Determination of cavern outline for International Gallery I 0:

DEC Comment 2a. The utility of re-entering Well 52 to obtain a sonar survey was not addressed as requested - please do so.

I

Finger Lakes Response: Finger Lakes saw no need to further reenter and sonar this well since well 52 was closer to 44 and the wellbore was evaluated with several comprehensive logging runs. The segmented/cement bond log for well 52 showed cement behind the casing and the gamma ray log on the left of the log showed formation tops/responses equal to the formation depths seen in other wells in the field. That proves that there is no cavern outside the cemented production casing down to where the brine was being produced. Obviously the sonar cannot see what is not there; that is, no cavern behind the casing in well 52 from the top of salt, except near the original bottom of the casing where brine was producedfrom injection of water in well 57.

DEC Comment 2b. Finger Lakes states "Well 18 was drilled and a deep well pump was utilized to extract brine from this well until it was abandoned in 1942." Please provide a copy of this well record.

Finger Lakes Response: Some well records were provided/or well 18 in Exhibit B to our September 28, 2010 Response. The only other additional records found (referencing wells in GallerylO) are included herein as Attachment B. 1 A well history summary spreadsheet with some ieformation originally supplied by Larry Sevenker (including for well 18) and a 1946 history of the plant and area salt deposit (page 4) indicate that well 18 was used as a deepwell pump from 19 3 7 to 1941, abandoned in 1942, and plugged in 1977.

DEC Comment 2c. It is understood that no production records are available for Well 18 (1936-1977 {1942}), Well 52 (1972-1983, 1985) and Well 57 (1977-1983, 1985). Please explain how Messrs. Sevenker, Eyermann, Istvan, Moon and Crea concluded that the shape on the gallery map is supported by production records if not all production records are available. Please also confirm that the shape shown on the gallery map was originally determined by one of US Salt's predecessors. If "yes," please identify and provide earliest dated map showing the same gallery outline.

Finger Lakes Response: The open hole logs of wells 52 and 57 both correlate horizontally. As previously discussed in our September 28, 2010 response, well 57 was the water injection well, well 18 was produced with an electric submersible pump (no water injection, simply pumping brine out of the cavern), and well 52 was the withdrawal well. With water injection mostly into well 57, the larger area of the cavern was dissolved/developed as we have shown on the cross-section sent to DEC in September.

Thus, the International Gallery 10 interpretation shows the largest area of the cavern being around wells 57 and 18 for these reasons; most of the dissolution was near those wells and not well 52. The actual outline is conceptual based on the water injection into well 57. Other than what is provided in Attachment B

1 Some of the records are partially illegible; these are the best copies we could make.

2

L

(including a portion of a 1979 brinefield map), we were not able to find any historical gallery outlines of International Gallery 10.

DEC Comment 2d. Finger Lakes states that the CBL for Well 52 shows good cement from 1,180' to total logging depth and that there is no cavern behind the cemented well casing to those depths, and that the Tully, Marcellus and other formations are easily identified. Please provide a copy of Well 52' s CBL with the tops of the Tully, Marcellus, Onondaga, Helderberg/Manlius, Rondout, Bertie, Camillus and each Syracuse salt unit (i.e., F-4 through D-3) identified.

Finger Lakes Response: The Cement Bond Log (CBL) for well 52 has been annotated to show the tops of the referenced formations and, where applicable, the salt units (using Rickard designations). See Attachment C.

DEC Comment 3. Replacement wells: The location of any new wells, other than FL!, that may be drilled as replacement wells for other wells being plugged must be shown on Exhibit A.

Finger Lakes Response: As noted below in the first open item related to Finger Lakes' Cavern Development Plan and Proposed Operations, Finger Lakes will now be plugging and abandoning well 44. Finger Lakes will agree to install a replacement monitoring well that will be completed at the high point of the northern portion (or "head") of the Gallery. This well will be used as initially envisioned by Finger Lakes - that is, as a monitoring well. For the replacement well, no brine injection will take place, but the well could be used to recover any LPG that moves in the head of the Gallery. The location of the replacement well is shown as FL2 on revised Exhibit A which is included with this Response as Attachment D.

Reservoir Suitability Report

The following issues remain and must be addressed concerning Finger Lakes' Finite Element Analysis ("FEA, "Exhibit C):

DEC Comment 1. The FEA's executive summary on page 1 states "Both well 58 (far away and not on FEA map, and NYSEG Galleries I natural gas storage service) and 2 are also too far away to have any affect on the Finger Lakes (FL) LPG storage cavern" [sic].

DEC Comment la. Does the above FEA statement hold true should the NYSEG Gallery 2 (tentatively being transferred to Arlington Storage Company, LLC) be converted to natural gas service at some future date with a 0.18 psi/ft minimum and 0.75 psi/ft maximum operating pressure measured to the ceiling of the cavern at Well 31? Please modify the FEA as appropriate to address this issue or provide the page number where this is already addressed.

Finger Lakes Response: Yes, the FEA conclusions are still valid, even with the conversion of NYSEG Gallery 2 to natural gas service. As noted in the FEA, the existing NYSEG natural gas storage caverns known as Gallery 1, fature

3

NYSE GI Arlington natural gas storage Gallery 2 (wells 3 0, 45 and 31) and well 58, are too far away to affect storage operation of Finger Lakes LPG storage caverns. Based on rock mechanics and FEA calculations, much of the solution mined space that will be used for natural gas storage in NYSEG!Arlington Galleries J and 2 is in rubble that will provide support to the walls of the caverns at both the maximum and minimum planned storage pressure regime after passing the required mechanical integrity testing. The FEA does make reference to NYSEG Gallery 2 and the mechanical analyses performed for this gallery assuming natural gas service. FEA, p. 6. See also Exhibit 10 from Finger Lakes' initial application dated October 9, 2009. The description of the model in the FEA also references NYSEG Gallery 2. FEA, p. 8.

DEC Comment lb. Is the converse of the above FEA statement valid (i.e., Finger Lakes' LPG caverns will not affect the existing or proposed NYSEG/Arlington Galleries I & 2)? Please modify the FEA as appropriate to address this issue or provide the page number where this is already addressed.

Finger Lakes Response: Conversely, by detailed calculation and implication, operation of the Finger Lakes LPG caverns will not affect the existing or proposed NYSEG!Arlington natural gas storage Galleries I and 2 at the proposed maximum and minimum pressure regimes as a high/low pressure vessel, after passing the required mechanical integrity testing.

The following issues remain and must be addressed concerning Finger Lakes' cross-sections (Exhibits D, E & F):

DEC Comment 1. The title block of both cross-sections (Exhibits D & E) show the company name as "Arlington Storage Company, LLC." The cross-sections should be revised to show the applicant's name.

Finger Lakes Response: The vertical cross-sections (revised Exhibits D and F), revised to show Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC in the title block, are included with this Response as Attachment E.

DEC Comment 2. Proposed Well FL! must be shown on Vertical Section B-B' (Exhibit D).

Finger Lakes Response: The revised cross-section being provided in response to the comment above shows proposed well FLJ and FL2 (the replacement for monitoring well 44).

DEC Comment 3. As previously requested, the setting depths of the brine strings must be shown on the cross-sections (Exhibits D & E). Please indicate "existing" or "planned" for each string.

Finger Lakes Response: The revised cross-sections show the setting depths of the brine strings (existing and planned).

4

DEC Comment 4. Replacement wells: The location of any new wells that may be drilled as replacement wells for other wells being plugged must be shown on the cross-sections (Exhibits D & E).

Finger Lakes Response: The replacement well for well 44 (identified as FL2) is shown on vertical cross-section Section B-B' and revised Exhibit A. FLI is also shown on Vertical Section B-B'.

DEC Comment 5. There appears to be a typo in Vertical Section B-B' at Well 52 where "TOR" is noted (Exhibit D).

Finger Lakes Response: TOR should have been TOF and this has been corrected on this cross-section.

DEC Comment 6. Any newly acquired sonar surveys must be incorporated and noted on the appropriate cross-sections along with providing a copy of the survey itself (e.g., Well 58).

Finger Lakes Response: The recent sonar survey for well 58 is reflected on revised vertical cross-section A-A '. A copy of the sonar report, vertilog, vertilog inspection report, Gamma Ray Segmented Bond Log, and casing inspection and cement bond log evaluaiton are included with this Response as Attachment F.

DEC Comment 7. The "Final Estimated Cavern Shape" of all well caverns must reflect Finger Lakes stated intention of using a LPG blanket during storage operations. In addition, the depth (MSL) of the top of the final estimated cavern must be shown (Exhibits D & E).

Finger Lakes Response: The revised vertical cross-sections show the Final Estimated Cavern Shape which does reflect Finger Lakes stated intention of using a LPG blanket during storage operations.

DEC Comment 8. Structural cross-sections A-A' & B-B' (Exhibit E) must be expanded vertically to show all formation tops noted in Figure 2 of the FEA (i.e., Marcellus, Onondaga, Helderberg/Manlius, Rondout, Bertie, Camillus, Salt).

Finger Lakes Response: Structural cross-sections A-A' and B-B' have been revised and are included herein as Attachment G.

The following issues remain and must be addressed concerning Finger Lakes' Cavern Development Plan and Proposed Operations:

DEC Comment 1. It is understood that Well 44 may now be a candidate for plugging. Given that Well 44 was originally proposed to be a monitoring well, the Department requests that consideration be given to the installation of a replacement monitoring well that would be completed at the high point (as determined by the 2009 sonar) of the northern portion ("head" for

5

--------- ----

the purpose of this discussion) of proposed Finger Lakes Gallery I. This use of this replacement well, similar to what was envisioned for Well 44, would be an indicator (monitoring) well for LPG which inadvertently moves past the "fill point" between the main body and head of Finger Lakes Gallery I. However, use of this replacement well should be limited to monitoring. No brine or product injection should take place at this well to ensure no growth in this portion of Gallery I. In addition to serving as an indicator well, the replacement well could also be used to recover any LPG that moves into the head of the gallery.

Finger Lakes Response: Finger Lakes agrees to install a replacement monitoring well that would be completed at the high point (as determined by the 2009 sonar) of the northern portion ("head" for the purpose of this discussion) of proposed Finger Lakes Gallery J. Use of this replacement well will be limited to monitoring. No brine or product injection will take place at this well to ensure no growth in this portion of Gallery 1. The replacement well could also be used to recover any LPG that moves into the head of the gallery.

DEC Comment 2. Any operational changes that result from the plugging of wells previously planned for use must be explained.

Finger Lakes Response: Jn consultation with the DEC, Finger Lakes has revised its plan as follows: Well 33 will still be used/or injection and withdrawal; wells 34, 43 and 44 will be plugged and abandoned; new well FLJ will be drilled for injection and withdrawal; and what we are calling new well FL2 will be drilled as a replacement for well 44 and be used as a monitoring well and only to recover LPG that moves into the head of the Gallery.

DEC Comment 3. Exhibit G "Finger Lakes Cavern Volume and Salt Tonnage Extracted or to be Extracted" must be updated to account for any newly acquired sonar survey (e.g., Well 58).

Finger Lakes Response: See Attachment H.

DEC Comment 4. Finger Lakes states it "will leave enough LPG in the cavern to prevent any solutioning of the cavern roofs. This plan is similar to what the Department approved for Cavern 6 at the Savona LPG Facility." Please provide the minimum thickness of the LPG blanket that will be maintained during storage operations, and from which point in the cavern it is measured. It is understood that any recoverable blanket will be removed for workover operations but reinstalled when storage operations are resumed.

Finger Lakes Response: Jn well 58, Finger Lakes will leave -6, 000 barrels at the new casing cut off at approximately 2, J 57 feet. In FL!, the depth will be determined when the well is drilled.

DEC Comment 5. Finger Lakes states "During operation of Gallery I, Finger Lakes also proposes to utilize a digital pressure recorder on well 52 that will be linked to Finger Lakes' control room and SCAD A system to ensure that pressures in both Gallery 1 and I 0 are monitored to ensure that in the unlikely event there is some potential communication" ... "actions can be implemented to ensure product is not allowed to enter Gallery I 0 which may not be tight." What

6

days and hours will the control room be manned? What specific actions would be taken if communication between the galleries is indicated?

Finger Lakes Response: Inergy has a control room at its Stagecoach station manned 24 hours a day. Finger Lakes' control room will be monitored during operating hours, which will typically be from 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. When no personnel are at the Finger Lakes facility, the SCADA system that will be installed for the Finger Lakes facility will be electronically connected to Stagecoach. In addition, if any alarm ever occurs at Finger Lakes, it will be programmed so that local operators will be contacted by phone. In terms of actions to be taken if such communication is indicated, product will be withdrawn from the galleries and transferred to tank cars and trucks.

Well Status and Condition Report

The following issues remain and must be addressed concerning Finger Lakes' Well Status and Condition Report:

DEC Comment 1. Given certain well applications were received, issues related to the adequacy of wells for the project are being reviewed by the Department's Region 8 Mineral Resources office in Avon. Discussions are ongoing concerning the drilling, conversion and plugging of various project wells. However, Finger Lakes' response to this Third NOIA must identify which wells will be plugged within the proposed storage galleries, and the proposed use of all remaining and new well(s).

Finger Lakes Response: See response above to Comment 2 under Finger Lakes' Cavern Development Plan and Proposed Operations.

DEC Comment 2. Finger Lakes' response did not include all of the well logs described. Please provide one copy of the following logs: Microvertilog (Wells 33, 44, 52, 58) and CBL (Wells 34, one copy of52 as requested in above Item 2d on Page I).

Finger Lakes Response: Finger Lakes has provided the following logs/surveys/reports:

Well 33: Segmented Bond Log- Gamma Ray: 1126109 [submitted to DEC on 9128110} Segmented Bond Log-Gamma Ray: 1016110 [submitted to DEC on 10128110}

Well 34: Microvertilog: 1126109 [submitted to DEC on 9128110} Segmented Bond Log- Gamma Ray: 1016110 [submitted to DEC on 10128110}

Well 43: Gamma Ray Radial Bond Log: 1016110 [submitted to DEC on 10128110}

7

Well 44: Segmented Bond Log- Gamma Ray: 1127109 [submitted to DEC on 9128110} Segmented Bond Log- Gamma Ray: 1017110 [submitted to DEC on 10128110}

Well 52: Gamma Ray Segmented Bond Log: 11114109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Microvertilog: 11114109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Sonar Survey: 11119/09 [submitted to DEC on 5114110}

Well 58: Cement Bond Log: 11117192 [submitted to DEC on 9128110}

Compensated Neutron-Formation Density Log: 10121192 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Gamma Ray Neutron: 1114109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Gamma Ray Segmented Bond Log: 10114109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Mircrovertilog: 10114109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110} Sonar Report: 10120109 [submitted to DEC on 5114110}

Gamma Ray Segmented Bond Log: 3124111 [submitted with this response} Vertilog: 3124111 [submitted with this response] Echo-Log Sonar Report: 3125111 [submitted with this response} HR Vertilog Inspection Survey Report: 3127111 [submitted with this response) Baker Hughes Casing Inspection and Cement Bond Evaluation: 411111 [submitted with this response}

A microvertilog was not run for wells 33 and 44 in 2009 or 2010.

A microvertilog was run for wells 52 and 58 in 2009 and that was provided in our submission of May 14, 2010.

The segmented bond log/or well 34 conducted on October 6, 2010, was provided to the Department on October 28, 2010. The only other records we have uncovered is an MIT report and chart on Finger Lakes Gallery 1 from 1985. See Attachment I.

DEC Comment 3. A copy of any newly acquired well evaluation logs must be provided to the Department (e.g., Well 58).

Finger Lakes Response: See Attachment F referenced above.

8

List o(Attachments

A GPS latitude/longitude coordinates for Wells 44 and 52 B Additional Records for well 18 and Gallery 10 C Annotated Cement Bond Log for well 52 D Revised Exhibit A showing location of replacement well as FL2 E Revised Vertical Cross-Sections F Sonar Survey, vertilog, vertilog inspection report, Gamma Ray Segmented Bond

Log, and casing inspection and cement bond log evaluation for well 58 G Revised Structural Cross-Sections A-A' and B-B' H Revised "Finger Lakes Cavern Volume and Salt Tonnage Extracted or to be

Extracted" I Finger Lakes Gallery 1 MIT Report and Chart, dated 1985

9 1826591.3

A

INPUT State Plane, NAD83

3102 - New York Central, U.S. Feet Vertical - NAVD88, U.S. Feet

Northing/Y: 882606.0849

EastinglX: 735741. 6888

Elevation/Z: 683. 7542

Convergence: -o 12 39. 74053

Scale Factor: 0.999945652

Combined Factor: o. 99991814 5

Northing/Y: 882959. 7996

Easting/X: 735602. 2239


Convergence: -o 12 41.02077

Scalefactor: 0.999945679

Combined Factor: o. 999917781

Northing/Y: 883490.0590

Easting/X: 735613. 8026

Elevation/Z: 684 .1020

Convergence: -o 12 40. 95537

Scale Factor: o. 999945677


Northing!Y: 883017.1446

Easting/X: 735687 - 5598

Elevation/Z: 6 8 6 _ s 9 2 o

Convergence: -0 12 40.25739

Scale Factor: o. 999945663


Remark:

Office Project

13 February 2009

WELL52

WELL57

WELL 17

WELL 18

OUTPUT Geographic, NAD83

Vertical - NAVD88, U.S. Feet

1/4

Latitude: 42. 42205~

Longttude: 16.s9611F

Elevation/Z: 683. 7 54

214

Latitude: 42. 423021106

Longitude: 76.896695028


314

Latitude: 42. 424476291

Longitude: 76.896659389

ElevationJZ: 684.102

414

Latitude: 42. 423179328

Longitude: 76.896379750

Elevatlon/Z: 686. 592

Corpscon v6.0.1, U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers

we.1..1.ii=1 ::ii

INPUT state Plane, NAOB3

3102- New York Central, U.S. Feet Vertical - NA V088, U.S. Feet

Northing/Y; 878930. 9952

Easting/)(: 737158.osos

Efevation/Z: 540.8793

Convergence; -o 12 26. 73740

Scale Factor: o. 9q99453a1


Northing/Y: 881430.6444

Easting/)(: 735947. 7183


Convergence: -o 12 37.80189

ScaleFactor: 0.999945613

Combined Factor. o. 999917244

NorthJng/Y; 8B2134 .2464.

Easting/X: 735714. 0331

Elevatlon/Z: 7 os . 14 s 3

COnvergence: -0 12 39.954B4

Scale Factor.: 0.999945658


Remall<:

Office Projea

14 December 2007

WELL42

WELL43

cu1-1,ji::i-"'t:::i~U

OUTPUT Geographic, NADB3

Vertical -NAVD88, U.S. Feet

9111

Latftqcfe: 42.411981387

Longitude: 76. B9087B546

Elevation/Z: 54 o. s 1 9

10/11

Latitude: 42.418828491

Longitude: 76.895394605


11111

Latitude: 42.4207568b4

Longitude: 76. 896269652

Elevation/Z: 7 o s .14 8

Corpscon v11.o.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineen;

p. 't

B

------------------

CO: SCHUYLER ELEV 687'

US SALT COMPANY - WATKINS GLEN, NEW YORK

VERTICAL WELL DESIGN

WELL - 18 N 883,017' 42.423179328 E 415,388' 76.896879750 NY 31-097-51496

START DRILLING: END DRILLING : 10-36 ABANDONED: 19 72 P&A: 07-01-77

CASING PROGRAM 10' 14" NA# 588' 10-3/4" 40.5# 1699' 6-5/8" 23# 2096' 3-1/2" 10. 7# REMOVED

CEMENTING PROGRAM 10-3/4" SURFACE NA SX POZMIX

6-5/8" PROTECTION NA SX CLASS A,

BRIDGE OF STONE 8. DIRT 1906' - 1876' PLUG: RETAINER 1865' PB.A: 600 SX LIGHT 07-01-77 8 TOPPED OFF W/ 31 SX COMMON 10-86

M~ELLUS 1466'-1493' & 1512'-1536' _ __.;~_:=~:;;;ji! F SALT LAYERS 2022' TO 2492' -D SALT LAYERS NA' TO NA'

DIRECTIONAL SURVEYS NONE

REV DATE: 09-10-10 P&A DATE: 07-01-77 B 10-86 PLUG DEPTH: 1904' GR DA TE: 06-30-77

TOP OF CAVITY @ 2003' 06-30-77

SONAR DATE: NA TOP OF RUBBLE@ 204~' SONAR TONS: NA 06-30-77 DEV SURVEY: NA A7M: NA f PRODTONS:-~'\.....JA TE: NA MIT PRESS: NA PSI MARCELLUS: 1466'-1492' & 1524'-1536' DRILLED: 472' INfO SALT (D-4) WORK-OVERS: 2 TIMES DURING 16 YR LIFE

SURFACE

12-1/4" HOLE CEMENT 12-1/4" X 10-34"

10-3/4" 40.5#@ 588'

CEMENT 9-7 /8" X 6-5/8"

PLUG AT 1699'

6-5/8" 23# @ 1699' POSSIBLE PULLED OUT OR DAMAGED

TOP OF SALT @ 2022'

TD@ 2044' 06-30-77

BOTTOM OF D-4 SALT @ 2492'

5-7 /8" HOLE

ORIGINAL TOTAL DEPTH @ 2494'

LARRY SEVENKER CONSULTING ENGINEER

WATKINS GLEN REFINERY

BRINEFIELD SUMMARY

~NITIALLY PREPARED BY

THOMAS EYERMANN

SEPTEMBER, 1.979

©

FROM,

SUBJECT:

INTERNATIONAL SALT COMPANY

October 7, 1982

Mr. A. J, Edwards

Marshall S. Held

Watkins Glen Refinery

Revisions to Brinefield Summary

The attached revisions dated September 30, 1982 include recent data

on the testing and workover of well #45 and are intended as a sup

pliment to the Watklns Glen Refinery llrinefield Summary Report dated

September, 1979.

~ MSH:bdf Attachments: xc: Mr. J. A. Loose

:;~-.: - '

l. ;,,·J

BRINEFIELD SUMMARY

This report consists of data sheets for each well in the Watkins Glen

Brinefield. These sheets s1lllllllfl.rize the completion work and current

status of each well. The report also contains data sheets for each

gallery in the brinefield, excluding the galleries labeled "South

Cavity" and "North Cavity", which were developed in the upper salt

by trump-type operations. Additional and more complete informa.tion

on the brinefield is available in the brinefield files at Watkins

Glen.

WELL NUMBER l8

·.~ DRILLING HISTORY

DATE DRILLED 10/36

HOLE SIZE SURFACE:

CORED

CASING SURFACE:

CEMENTED

FRACTURING HISTORY

DATE

LOOGING

USE

TD

SIZE

Abandoned DATE 12/31/79

ELEVATION KB GL 687

l'ROOOCTION: 14" to 600' , 9" to 1702' , 7" to 2494.

PRODUCTION:

CONNECTION Trump

DATE FILE NO. GAMMA NEUTRON CALIPER TEMP. CIL 3-D CBL illHER

6/30/77 18-1 x x

TUBING

SIZE DATE REASON

PACKER SETrING DEPl'H 'ilTINGER

MISC. Abandoned i9I12. Plugged 7/1/77 with 550 sks. Halliburton Light from 1904'.

' ' j ~ .i

GALLERY 10

WELL

LAST WORKOVER

·LAST LOGGING

LAST SONAR

CASING BOTTOM

CAVITY TOP

~ METER TYPE

Comments

-·

USE

52

10/78

6/22/82

8 5/8" - 2733

2730 - 2736

Halli h11rton

Brine

57

10/78

6/22/87

B 518" - 2742

2676 - 2742

DATE Revised

Cleaned out both Well 52 and Well 57 due to no flow through cavity. Subsequently pumped through.

12/31/79 7/23/82

WATKINS GLEN REFINERY -- --------

/\PP ROVED TITLE BRINEFIELD SCALE CATE OWG. No. REV.

FIGURE 1-------------1----1 I"· 4 oo· 1111617 g t------------+----1 DRAWN BY PROJ_ No.

TJE

~ '"'---

~

WELL mJMBER 52 USE Brine ·DATE 12/31/79 REVISED 7/23/82

DRilJ..IllG HISTORY '

lYITE DRJLLED 9/27-10/15/72 TD 27B2 ELEVATION KB 697 GL 68!

ROLE SIZE. SURFACE: 17-1/2-.45 I PRODUCTIO!l: 12-1/4-2755

CORED 2025 - 2782 SIZE 6-3/11 x 3-1/2

CASrnG SURFACE: H40, 48 lb, 13-3/8-44•

1PRODUCT!ON: K55, 32 lb, LT&C, R3, 8-5/8"-2750'.

CEMENTED 850 sks. Hs.lliburton ·Light, lOO sks. Common vi th returns,

FRACTURING HISTORY J

DATE 11/7/73 CONNECTION None 5/78 Well 57 - Gallery 10

LOOGING

llATE FILE NO. GAMMA NEl.ll'RON CALIPER TEMP. CIL 3·D CBL Cll'HER

10/12/72 52-1 * x x x 10/12/72 52-2 * x 11/13/79 52-3 x x 7/25/75 52-4 * x x T/25/72 52-5 * x 10/3/77 52-6 * x li/27/"f8 52-T * x x 6/22/82 52-8 * x 6/22/82 52-9 * x x

6/22/82 52-10 * x

!rUBING

SIZE DATE REASON

PACKER SEITING DEPTH STINGER

MISC. Formation plugged 2015' v/100 sks. Connnon, 1980' w(lOO sks. Common .

. - ,, I '

f

\......-'~--

. ·

WEU. NUMBER 57 USE Water DATE 12/31/79 Revised 7/23/82

DRll.LiliG HISTORY •

DATE DRil.LED 8/22-9/16/77 TD 2770 ELEVATION KB GL 695

HOLE SIZE SURFACE; 18" - 80' PROOOCTION: 12-1/4 - 2770

CORED SIZE

CASING SURFACE: 14" - 80 1 PRODUCTION: K55, 32 lb, LT&C, R2, 8-5/8" - 2764'.

CEMENTED 1100 \

sks. Pozmix w/brine - returns.

FRACTURlNG HISTORY

DATE 4/24-5/3/78

LOOCilfG

DATE FILE NO. G»llo!A

9/6/77 57-l * 9/12/77 57-2 * x 10/5/77 57-3 x 10/10/77 57_J, x 6/22/82 57-5 * 6/22/82 57-6 * x 6/22/82 57-7 *

'·!

SIZE

PACKER

,;

CONNECTION Well 52 - Gallery 10 Very weak connection in 15 hrs. Alternated pumping 57-52-57 to •.1ash through.

NEUl'RON CALIPER TEMP. CIL 3-D CBL Cll'HER

•, Incl. x x x

Perf. x

x x

DATE REASON

SE'I'r ING DEFT!! STINGER

MISC. Plugged back for lost circulation w/350 sks. Halliburton Light at 2020'. Drilled with air to 2100' .

" '

I

No. l'J ',nll

LC·,, l~' 1 1936

: ... ,co'";: of' c.rillir•[' as follows&

•:, tl '"· .ck Slat• Lime (brokeri) SlP.te •, ~ilelli.

l}roy ~l~te L!:;ht t.rom

s!1ale Li:!ie Qre~· el,1te Li ,r.;h t l!rown

::rwle Tully lir.1e Slate Mhi te Mui;i i:lr c"' o SL" l e t::.luto & atiells Brown shb.le \\;;itc e11ble ~ r·OWl" et.i. le ,.:ar.oflll 1rs .•hale :·aagara l l:ne ,, : .1 to lime l.~rr.e si.J.el:~

s.1t Slb.te ~~ rJ 1 t Sl ~ te Lfr:~ ";) "•'. (J '· .'i; ' lllj :- 'l t :.'J.rit•; ~ ,, 1 t.

!! If

II It

o• 8•

l '{' 31'

13~' 22 I

JlR' )JJ... I 344 I

365 I !:)()l I

534 1

554 1

592 I 6;$1 l'1,. 7 I 966' 9e.) 1

1.,.6,) I l.l+6ti• 15761 1992 1

~~U~) ~I

22.~6 I

";,; '1 ' ') I ' ' '

"13" I ' ~ L.

'<1 7' ' _,4 ;- __ ,e1 1

2:. 1 1~ I

'·'i,.?]' . c. I

72' i;: l,_) t

.? J. ,-·'

- 81 - 17 1 - 311 - 1341 - 228• 318•

- 3341

- 3~' - ) ,5 I

- 501• - 5341

- 5.54 1

- :,921 - &;.:51 - ti07 I - '760' - ';i .;,;1 - 1463 1 .. - i., .. : e' - 1:-' 761 - c'J92' - 2v; 2 • - ~2...:6•

. ·2~') t

- 23;·0• - '3321 - '34 ., ' ,_ (

.' 3'' 11 - '41(' I - ;_\~2;,'

- :141.C1 .. ; - ;4"~··

2i~r ·\~ t

Loe at 1.:rn 1 ut. • • cir l l led Arl!r>c101"1ed

i".lth:1ce tc1 Bhll 'i" t.r;} de;otr Li;~~ :·nco1·d of l \:.!nr;

0ct. 1936 - cnaed S2 j(·~:its .:' -27 :cl~·, lOt

l 9: r, -I.. . " l I ' - .

:··.:~eJ:

t:;. er ;i

\, 3 : :' b

Sectl .. n No,~

i:n y1i·.·cl') of 6~" '· 1~.~('l c)r lO''

Tc·Cnl •

T r.e.l -, l '

.i:f Tu Llil -

Hecor -· ;,f int;t3rr.;rt1,:iris - 2

1111 fo<>t f )r) f .r.t;

Tb?'S .'.'•oet

1720 I't?e~

J6? f ,, <) t 20 11~-, :-~ £j t

-2 foet 2091 fct1t

Stor) J ri 1 1_urn1 ;.;o. !} -.~L.92 ~ 0 d1 :1·Jved to ?

19}6 - rot. l''¥ ,'022 feet ::.,94 f"let

'.> \ i(;J),S

s !.t1::'.le~

.~::1 .:~: ;,1-111 s r: .. ulu ha·.•o J-lu~· ~1 J.ri•1e f l;.e to prttv{;nt Uebris t>e lP6 \,1.ro .. n ln ti.e .,:ilu • T.1ls well bpprvx1Jautul:,· L\6 fo<• t at>Ollto lel:C l•)V0lo nt U!'tl tiJne 2000 feet :•f t•.itlnt, v1s.1 drol0 ped 200 fest, Bl'1d at }1r''Sll1"1t t;·,ere la ai:<.ht 500 !'·:c ~, ·.:..if J~ iP(;.:l -,...,Llrit~ .:.o ti:e [1',;l~. l\.';.:,._\_it r __ \)C foet o~

i.· L~cn n<'l•o .;rilled to take 1. lricn : .l ! "• ... ,:n ella,..,.. JL1nijJ all cus l '1.~ a:i.J sub:tir- \·:as re:nt1 ·~·c.:cJ exct'.'>F t, t:-:o .. O feet "ts~crte-. by J1•oppini.;.

L)tl:-'!' ick B till fl!: 11:1~! 'l .. ~ a:, ~;. ~ ~ Wflll.

'.''lll '.L. 19

Loca ttun: !:~.lt<J l)ev~r drillc..:. l...·e:rtck wu,'3 ut c..; '1~1J wi_•l l :,'---. ~·ti~-ct:iopl~·.ect.

Al).a.iui:.ned beca.us1 o.'.r1.c.i~1~t(Jn.f.r'L~n ;t'Cll~r.:9 w'.•, .ur • 17 ., :"J.

11rid .:.i·:f"rr\l:1:•'.n1 ·r•·'.;; H'..j ~~~; ri1-\ti:d. 0..Jrrtl_·)· 1'a::i razl·!:.... 1,~·~ suri:. ~o :;'-lJ:t.1,·flo

•

.~ -,:. ~ ~.-.• ·~<'~::~::,:~F;;;:~,(.: Jllr • I'• W •. Vz'lchton

P. J. Poll •'' .,,

<'· Old No · 1 well (laat!IS out . but .not plugpd. Plug 1rl tCIJI' ot <.

Jllr;;·f ' .. ,~~·:~~·:~~.~~~~.,:·::ng-l·~·:op· Ot hol•: '" , .. _. _ No. ~ Well. """' ., . ..,,

i'.}_'!,~l D2l pluged.

····:"•'• !lo. 3 W•ll •. Casing and packer pulled and pl111&9dat-ll450° •

. _.. _ No. 4 Wtll. Aot1'N. caalna 1n b•ct ahap•. Broken into la ,;r111·-:::

f/ c:i~l1ng. :.· ··' ' , ':;:;·. -~-

. Ho. ~ Old l!le11.

·· "o. 6 w.11 ca•tns wa• l•t't ln •11, wa1 not>plugg•d. ,. '. -- . '.'·;·::~:,;: "•--"

caa1nc in bild lbap9. •11 . ' ' ' ' ',, ' . -.....

;:.>_;:.,·;;·:,:·~

,. -~· Jio. 7 w.11. Aotlv•.

,,._,,,, ·-. -.. ·'_•

-.. - . ~;·:·~,

···--iii·

~·_,

~~ .. a "911 lo. tlibi,ng ..... left 1n·~1,o • p.aolc9r ~!'11·.-•• ,1~. - -

,,"i~ Noj g aa•ial • ._.1.rt in. Tt1fll!~1 ••w.• Bst·P1lilc.d~ . .,_ " . ,- - ' .- .• -,'-i-;

' .'·_,. - ... ' ' - : '__ ·,-;_·; ... <:_f_:· --- -·: ,·_. ' ... _, ·,, ' ,_ , ..... rut._. t w.11 c._.11'11 1•tt tn .. ~l ~~ .. •;!!a p1ua••· -· ·'' , · 10 W.11 6 to 1001 or 6,,, oa•lq 1trt ln •11 ' wei:1:-ria po!~:::,:·:-v1:

-~a. _ __ _ ~~-.-. .· . , ~- >- .. _ .· _ . . • . -·. .,v_·;~,~~ t~:ht" 11 "911 all t\l~ and caa~ ~llOV.4 _&M W.11 plcPl. C: .. il~t'~

i}~f~~i!!: ::: ~: ::~~ ::::. 1·:0~t~:1~~:::::: ::e~~~.-~~:~ . _

,)tJ' ltakll'l& b,. ca•1ftC aOMt11Ma, ... - /j ' .· .. -· -, · ~- .. --. .. -- -'' : \',)".t'1J''.}'.!:-'IT{'. rV Pld xo. 13 w.11 tub1ng and oatS.lirl ·;~ft 111 w11. . :. · - . ·:

13 Well tubing and oa•J.~ ~J",ti•d. Well Plugged •. '·:-\- -· '

11-- ' ,,, '

I

I 1

I 12181201 o is lattlst Revision. I I I I Sea '•Updatln.:*r r.,,_re,...cti"'·.,o"'n ..,N.,.ot'ien•'.,.' a7t..,broii.tto"'m"'°'o"lfi"-''"'""·~x+--=+=+-:c,d-r.ol~~='-=e....,.,.r=--=,;-,,,,r~~,;--,='-~._,,x+--=+-.~~-=1~-1-:...,_.'"'4~.i-:,,i.-,.,.i~,+-~1--,,~d-~~d-=-'~.,.k ~A~~ AC' 3 3A 3B 4 s sA: s; 7 7A a e 9A io ,, i2 2A 13 '13A: 14'14A 4B is: 1& 1sA 11 18 19 20;10A 21 : 221 23: 2• 2s: 26 27J 28 s2: 53;s3A 54 AB sAsN1

1Ds

0

s :-.. e=s7

0

='1 __ ss-1-s-9+-s-01,__&1_,.

1_s_.2

1894 AL AL I I I I I I I A N I I --;Ts5 AL -AL I I I Al ANNULUS INJ i I -;ij96 AL - AL AL I I AL AIR LIFT -~--+-+--<1-+--1 ~ AL - AL AL I I AP AIR PAO I

1895 AL --AL AL l BW BRINE w·E"'Llc,-1--!--+-11--+--J 1899 AL - AL AL I I 0 DRILLED~, ~AL -AL AL -+----+--i,--+----+-l---+--+-+--+---+-+--+--+--l---+--',f---l--t-t---+---+-+--,f---+--t-t---t--t-t--t---+--l--+--lr--+---+--l!---f----7-t--t-t---l---l·-+--+--+-+--+---t--l--l·--l!---l--f---l--t-t---+-~. OH I I DRILLEDHORIZONT~Alt---+---+-1 ~1Al -AL AL-+---+-r\ --l--+--+-f--+--+-l--+--+-+--+--+1--+--+--i,--~--+-+--+---+-+-, -+---+-+--+---l-+--+--i!--+--+-l---l---+-l--+--+-+--+-+--+---l--+--+--l--+--+--'l---l---+-!----+-+--l---+-+--+--+~D~04--P-+.IDO~Rl.;;;:SIPLLOES~-OLIUNTJPLUI G

1902 AL - AL AL I I 01 ~ ~AL =Al AL _ _J I OP DEEP WELL PUMP ~AL AL AL AL AL I I GS I jGAS STOR&GE I 0Sii5' AL - AL AL - - AL AL I L LOGGED I ""1906. AL - AL AL - - AL AL - AL ' ' l ND NOT DRILLl:O --r907 AL - AL AL - - AL AL - AL AL 0 OBSERV.iir"'1""o"'N--l1-+--+--+-I ._J_WB AL = AL AL - 1- AL AL= AL AL PA PLUGGED & ABANDONED

~:~~ :t-:t :L Al L :t :t-:t :t 0 ;Bii l~;~~~TNJ~ow--'-;911 A t A - AL - AL AL - AL AL Ti TUBING INJ j

1912 I Al =AL Al= AL AL W/B jWATERIBRINE 1913 I AL _AL Al _AL AL WI WATERINJ 1914 I Al AL AL AL AL I WO WORK OVER 1915 i AL - Al AL - AL AL 1916 Al -AL AL -A~ AL~- AL '---+--+-t--t--t-t--+---t-+---!--t---t--t-t-~--t-t--r--t-t---+---t-+---f---l!---t---t--,f--+--+-t----l---t----t---t-t---+---t-t--+---t-+--l---l!---+--t--+--+-t--+--+-+--+---l--'---l-+--+-+--1--1--1

I I

1917 AL = AL AL = AL AL = AL AL_-+--t-f---t--t-r--t---t- +--f---lt---l--t-t---+--t-t---t--t-t----t---t-+--+--l-+---!---l-+--t-t--t-t---t--t-t--t---t-t--t---t-+--+--t--l--!---l--t--'f---l--l--f---1--+--+---+--+--+--,f---+--I 1918 AL AL AL AIL AL PA AL 1S19 AL = AL AL = AIL AL~AL-+--+-!---l---+-+--+--t-+--+--il--+--+-l--+--+-l---l---+-+--+--t-+--+-l-+--+---l-+--+-~-+-1---1---+-+--+--+-+--i---l--+--+-l--+-!--+--+-t--+--+-l----+--+--l----l-+--+--,l---1--I

1920 AL AL AL AL AL AL I 1921 AL = AL AL = AL AL AL--+--+-+--+---+-+--+--il---l---+-+--+--+1-+--+--t-+--+---l-+--+--il--+--+-t---l---r-t---t---t-+---t-+--+--t-+--+---l-+--+---i-+--+-!----+-+--l---+-+--+---+--+--+·-+--+--il---l---l- +--l--I ~ AL_ALAL_~AL AL 0 I 1923 AL _ AL AL_AL AL ___l__~ AL-+"-+-l--+--+-+--+--t-+--+--it---!--+-1 -+---+-+--+---l-+--+--il---!--+-t---+--+-+--+--+-+--+-+--+-1-+--+--i!--+--+--i!--+--+-t---+--+--+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+-l--+---l-+--l---+--I

~:~ :t - :t :t - :t :t-----r---1-:t-+--+-1--+--+-+--+--1--t---1---11--+--+1- 1---1---r-1---1---+- r1-1--+--+-t---+--+-+--+---+-+--+-+--+---i-+--+--1r-+--+--1r-+--+-t--+--+--+--+-+--+--+-+--+--,1---'--1---1----1-"--1---+--1 -;926 AL - AL AL - AL AL ----r--AL-+---l---+-+--l--l---lr--+--t---t-t----t--t--lt--+---t---t-t--+--+1--l-+--l---t--,t---t---l---t-r--t---t-+---l---t-+-+--l---t-+--l--+-f---l--l--+---l--+--,f--+---l---+-+--+--+-+--l---,1--!

~2J AL=AL AL~AL AL -t-AL - -+--l-- f---l--+- +--+---t--i--f--'t---t---t-t---t--t-t---t--t-T---t---t-+--+--l-+---l---l--l--i·-t--+-f---t--+-t--+---+-+--+--+--l--l---l--l--f---+--l---i!---+--l--f---l---1--1---+--+--+-l---+--I 1928 AL AL AL AL AL AL I 1929 Al=AL AL=AL AL ~AL-~--+--+--+--l--+--+--i;,--+--+-+--+--1-+---t---l-+--l--J-+--+-l--+--+-t--+--+-+--t---+-+--+-+--+---l-+--+--i!--+--+--i!--+--+-!--+--+--1----+-+--+--+-+--+---;l---.--l~-+---l--+--l---+-I

~;~~ :t-:t :t -:t :t~:t-:t--1---+-+--+--+-+--+---1-+--+-l--+--+-t--+--+-t---+--t-+--+--+--+--+--l-"'-_.._--;1---1----11--+--+-l--+--+-l--+--+-+--+---+-+---ll---+--+--ll---+--+--if--+--+---+--+-;--1--1---1---1-~ 1932 A Al -Al AL -AL AL--j-AL -AL

1933 A AL -Al AL -AL AL~ A -Al DP ,__~lf.,.-f----+-t---+---+-+---1---1!--+---l---l,--+---+--ll--+--t-t---+--+-+--+---+-+---i---l--f-----l-+----+--l!---f-----+--l!---f-----+-f---l--+-+---l--,.J.--+--l-+--+--+--,-l--!---i--l---,l---l---l'---l--l---I 1934 AL -AL Al j A DP OP DP DP ~O

~:;~ A PA - :~ A _ ,__ g~ g: g~ - g~ - OP-'-- OP OP '--l--t--,f---t--t-t---+--+-+--l---+--l--+--l-+----+-:---+--+--+--l--f---l--+-l--+-+-+--+---+--l--+--+--!---l!---l--l-~!---+--1--l----'-oi---!--f---'--l---l~ 1937 AL OP DP OP - DP - DP - - DP OP - DP OP "'No>rl---lt---t--+- t--+--+-+--+--tl-+--+---l-.--+-l---+--i!--+--+-l---t---+-l---!--+-+--+--+--+--1-+--+--l-+--+--l!-+--1---+--+-+--+--i'---+--1 1938 AL A OP OP - DP - DP _,__DP OP - DP OP -"'-l---+-t---+--+-+--+---+-+--+--l--+--+-'-+--+-+--+-!--+--l--l--+--+-l---l--+--,+--l---1--+--if---l---l---il--+-...;..-1----+-+--l---!---l---+--i~I 1939 OP OP OP - DP - OP --DP DP - OP OP --+--+-t--+--+1-+--+--1- +--+--l-;--1----t---+-+--+-l---l---+-t--+--+-+--+--t--+--+-+--+--il--+--+--it--+--+-l---f-+--"---!---t---l---if---I 1940 OP OP OP - OP - OP_,__ DP OP - DP OP --l---+-l---+--f-+--l--i-+--+--l-+--+---,+--+-+--+-!--+--+-l--+--+-+--1----+-+--l---1--+--if---l---l---lf--·1--1--1----+-+--+--!---l--+--if---I 1941 OP DP OP - DP - OP --DP OP - DP op--+--+- t---il,--+--+-l--+--+-t---1---t-+--+--t-+--t-+--+---l-+--+-l- +--+--i'--+--+-l----+-+--+--+-+--+--+-+--+-+--+--il---+-+-+--+--t 1942 OP OP OP - OP - OP-i--DP OP- A A I 1943 OP OP - DP - OP--DP op-+--+-l---t.A"P+--+--l,--+--+- l---l---+-!---l---t-t--+--t-+--t-+---+--1- +--+-1c--+--1·--i!---l---+-l----+-+--+--+-+--+---l - -l--l----+-+--+--l--+--l---if---I 1944 DP OP - DP - OP_,__ DP OP --l---1--1--+iA"°'P+--+--il'--+--+-l---l---+- l--+--+-l---+--+--+--+-+--+---l--+--'---l-+--+--if---l---+-!----+-!---l----+-+---+---+-+--+--1--+·-lf---l---+-+--+--I

i--!.,.;199454._6 OP A - oP = OP = :=:DP OP_+--+-!--+-'A-+-+=~l~+--+-l--+--+-+-+---+-+--l---+--+---+-+--1---l-+--1---l-+--l---if---1--+-!----+-!---l----+-!---+---+-+--+--1--+--il---L--+-!---1---1 .__,__,_ .,._--+---<-A OP OP OP OP --1--+-1--I --< AP j 1941 DP -OP ~-OP OP op'---hAJ:otl-+--+-l-+--l---it--+--+--+--+-+--+-+--+--+-+--+--+-+--+--+- +--+--il---+-!---l---+-l--+--+-l---+--+--+--'--+--1--1--+--l 1946 DP D OP _,__OP DP -+--1--1--,IA Al

1949 I IA DP ~::::=t- OP OP ~-1;.r,.Al -+--+--lf--+--+-+---+--+-+--+--+-!---l--+--l---+-+--l--+-+--l---l-+--+-f---l---!--+--+-+-+--+-+--l----l--l---lf---1---+-!--+--+---I i-.,;,~:S..,5,,_~._\ --'op '-+--+--'gp ~ - gP ..__,__g: -+--+- 1---1----+-'op L ~P -g: A DP '-+--+-r''"'A-+--'~p '--l---+-1---+--+-+--+--+- -+--+--1-+---1-+--1---11---t---+--11--+--+-+---+---+-+---l--+--+-+--+--+--l--+--+-+--1-- 1---1---1-+--+---+

--0 - 1--' - ·-1-,.,,,1: ... ;"'~+-~~p PA 1 _ D~ _._g: - - g: --1---1-- g: A ; g: --t---1--+--'lgp g: - -1---+-+--+--+--+--+--+--+----l-+---l--+--+--il--+--+--ll--+--+-+---+--+-+---l-+--+--l--+--+--l-+--+-+--l---,!---+--l-+--l---I

1954 OP _,__ OP -I-OP --1--+- op DP - - OP DP OP OP OP ~-1--t-+--+---l-+---,---l-+---l-+--+--il--+--+--il--+--+-l---+--t-+---i-+--+-1-+--+-J-+--+--l---+-l---+-l-+--+--I

1-.,;,19'"'ss"""--il---l---+-+--l---+-I -+- PA --OP - - OP A IA OP PA A OP OP DP 0 1956 _,__ OP -+--+-+--+--+-op PA DP - A OP OP OP ~-r--+-l--+--+-+--+--+--+--t-+--+--t-+--+---l-+--+--il--+--+--l---+-t---1---+-~-+--t--+-1-+--+-+--l---+--I

I I i I

I

I -- - -I I

1-.,,19_,5,.7+--+--1-+--+-i-g: g: -+--+-!--+--+-OP ~OP A g~ g~ ~: ~: Tl Tl '--+--t-+--t-+--+--t-+--+--l-+--+-l-+--+-l---+-+--+---t-+--+--..-+--+-+---1--+---+-l---+---l t--.~:.,,;,.:+--+---l-+--+--i-0011 D

0Pp -+--1--1---+--+-g~ g~ -+--+-!--DP OP:!!:: ~Tl Tl --+---+--+---+-+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-l- +--+-+---+-1---+--+- +--+--+-+--·l---l-+--1--!--+--l--1---l

1960 I OP DP DP OP Tl Tl Tl Tl l 1961 01 DP OP DP DP OP Tr TrTJ Tl Tl Tl

t-o.19"'s"'2+--+---l--+--+--l-01 DP --+--+-1---+--+-op I DP I DP OP TI:: ]:ti BW W1 Tl

t-.. is,,s,,3+--+---l--+--+--1-00

11

1 PA 1ADP 1r--~i-+--+--ir-+-~DP I DP OP op R Tl Tl BWWITI 1964 DP DP S S T! S s Tl

1965<i--+- +--+--+- +--o0

11

I 11

OP OP T S Tl S S Tl t:J!~s OP OP S S TI S S Tl t-~19~6~7+--+---l--+--+--l-o011 1

01 1,__-+--+l-+--1----+-+--+--+--+--+-+--l---+-+--+--+-+--+--t-+--+--1- OP OP~ls-TI S S Tl 1968 ,_DP OP S Tl S S Tl

Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl aw Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWTI Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl l'rTI Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAJ Tl Tl ri-T1 Tl s

1-.,_,1,:"~"'~!---+--l--+--+--l-g: g: - +--+-: -+---+-+--+---l--+--+-1---+--+- +---+--+-+--+--+--.PA r---+--+-+1,~,,_l"L'-->PA i-i--i: ~ ~ i: 1971 DI -r-- PA - 01 I PA L_ PA PA s S IPA S S Tl

l--1'""9""72:+--.--if,.L-+l- l---+--01 -11 r-01 --lw-+-+--+--'PA PA PA PAr---+---+--' I 1 - PA I I s s s s Tl 1973 I DI I I DI - PA '--h I I I I !--, PA PA PA I I I s S I S S Tl

.,-9'°"1·"41---+--+-+-, -1---l- OI WO I I Di l"I ' I I PA PA I I I I I I I iL s s I s s Tl

Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BWTI Tl s ' Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BWTI Tl s IS I ~--Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BWTI Tlw

I Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BWTI Tl S S Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BW T1 Tl S S Tl Tl Al Tl Al Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl BWAI Tl Tl BWTI Tl S S Tl Tl Al Tl Al Tl

Filename: WE •l!i' 1L 'Kl SUMMAKY by l.S 2008 DAC rev·n 12-8·10 (2).XlS Tab Name: \' .ry US Salt 1 Watkins Glen. NY Prinl Oate: 4. by Lany Sevenl<er; recenl updating by DACrea

I ~ I 01 I DI ' I I I I I l I s IS I s s Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl Tl aw Al Tl Tl 8W Tl Tl s s TI Tl AJ TI AJ Tl l I I I I

'97' PA -1-1,-.i-,-+---t'-- PA -+--+-+--°' --1,-+--+w-o,,__--+--, -+---l---+-1--+-----,--+---t-,-+-tc-+--+-r--+---+-t-1---+s=-t:s:-ill-S s Tl PA Tl Tl rt Tl aw 0 TI Tl SW Tl Tl S1S Tl n Al Tl Al Tl DI DI DI '--+1--1-!1'--+--+--,-1--1

---m7 PA 1.__1_-+--1--t--+---+-+-1_01 1 PA .~-11'-+--+-+--+--+-+--,----1--PA .--+--+-t--+---1-+--.PA _ +"s-+1s=-,_I _ s s 11 Tl n Tl A aw o Tl n awn n SIS sw n n Tl Al r 1 o 0t 01 T1 Tl 11 '--+-t---+-1

t-~"':'°"~1"19f--+--.PA ,_-+--+-oi--+---t-+--+-1 -~: : I 1PA I ; ~ ~ ; !~ =~ ~ ~: =:~ ~: ;: =~~ ;: rt::~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~~- ~: ;: ~:

1980 Ot ; S S S S - - Tl Tl Tl - 8WO Tl Tl BW Tl Tl S S WI Tl Tl Tl OWi O O O Tl BW BW--+-1;--+-1--1 1981 _._DI 1---t--+-+--+--1---+--;1""s--+s"-+--s s - Tl Tl rl - ew o Tl Tl aw 11 n ss WI n n n o wt o-o o - TI ew ew 1 1982 - ' DI -+-l---+-+--+-+-+-+-+-11-+-t-+--+-+-+-ll-+-t-+--+-+--+-!-+:s:---i-=s-+-s s --Tl wt aw= WI 0 aw Tl WI TI Tl K:~wt Tl Tl Tl OWi 0 0 0 Tl ew aw--'-+---1---,1--1 1983 I Ol -+--+-.-, +--+-+--+---l-+--+-1--+--+-'--+---+-t--+---+- t--+--t-+--+---,--+s=-t:s:---,i- s s _,_ Tl WI BW WI 0 aw Tl WI Tl Tl s s WI Tl Tl Tl O Wi 0 ~ 0 Tl BW aw

1su J 01 1 '-+-t-+--+-f-+-+-+--+--+-+-+-t-1-+-t-'i--t----1r--T'-1--rs-t.;:.s _+1-.., s s _,_ Tl wt aw - w1oawawwi n n sswi n TI Tl owtoo o n ewaw---+-t-+--1 1--1"'9~8_,_Sl--+--+-l--+--+-t--t--+-.i--.i-'-+---+'-r--+-~PA .--+---+-+--+-l--+--+-t--+---+-t-"i -----··-!--+--+-+--~ I ' 1 - 11 0 BW - WI o awo WI Tl TI ==WI Tl Tl Tl OBWO 0 0 0 0 WI --.--,

1986 ~I I 11_+--+-oi-+---+-+--+---t-+--+-l--+--+-l---+--+-l---+--+-i--t--t--.PA __ I - Tl O BW- WI o awo WI Tl Tl _,_WI Tl Tl Tl o SWO 0 0 O 0 WI l 1987 PA _L PA PA II I Tl O BW = WI O BWO WI Tl Tl _ _ WI Tl Tl Tl O BW O O 0· O 0 - WI 1 191!3 L_ BW .Q_ BW WI 0 aw 0 W1 0 WI 0 0 0 Tl 0 aw 0 0 0 0 0 WI

1--,9"'8'°'9+--+-l-+-I-+--+- ---- PA PA PA PA BW 0 aw PA WI 0 aw 0 W1 0 W1 PA PA 0 0 0 Tl 0 BW 0 0 Q 0 0 WI --+--l--+--J.-I --;g-90 ' _,_aw aw a w WI O BWO WI OWi 0 0 0 Tl .Q_ awo 0 0 0 0 WI --+--+-1---1-

1991 BW awaw- WI O BWO Wl O WI o O O Tl O BWO 0 o o O WI _,_,_. 1992 BW BWIWi- WI o awo WI OWi O O O IOHloew·o O O O O WI OH '-+---1---t---I 1993 ew ewaw- w1 o awo w1 o wi o o o n oewo o o _g__E.._w1 aw _-t--+-t--i 1994 BW awew- WI O BWO WI OWi 0 0 0 Tl O BWPA PA PA 0 0 WI aw

~::: =~ =~ =~=:: ~- :: ~ ~ ~ : , ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~:-+--+-1-'~~,._+r'°", .... ~~~ : -=~-=s+--+--+-1 1997 ! GS GSGS 8WBWaW- WI O BWPASBllo WIGS1GSO 0 0 BWTI 10 O f- SW ,!!! 1998 GS GS GS I SW PA PA r PA PA 0 'S9i'0 W1 GS GS BW BW 0 ~ BW _ _,__,_..._~O !=Bl BW GS _,__ -1999 GS GS GS BW 0 0 0 Wt ~.a PA aw PA SBI aw PA SBI aw If TI .::: 2000 I I GS GS GS BW 0 0 0 W1 GS :GS! B~SBI aw SBI' BW GS Al 2001 _._ 1 1 GS Gs GS ew _ • o o o w1 q_s GSI aw sat aw 1. sase

11

0o GG:ss AIAJ =

2002 PA PA PA _._ PA PA I_ PA PA PA 1 1 GS 1 GS GS aw 1 o o o WI Gs GS aw sa1 aw 20oi f--+- I I I I I i GS I GS GS aw 0 ._ 0 10 WI GS GS BW SBI ew::::::•:::::::::::::'.:.-:.~':.:_-~"'s:.;:a::;l-..;PA GS Tl Al -

Z004 I .. ,__ -- l--+--l-+--+-+--+-.--+-l-+-ll--!---i-'l-+-t-+-l!-+-l-+--t-,-1-4--f-+-l,;:GS:?>l-+::GSG,:S+GSGS::::;_._f_--. PA I PA PA PA PA GS IGS IS BWSBI Bw-1 fGS wt SW= zoos I I GS I I - GS GS ! SRI'. ewsa11 I aw==ia WI aw_ 2llOC I - I j GS GS GS I I .GS GS "~ BWSBll I ew GS Wf(aw 2007 l I I I l GS , GS GS l GS GS ISBl! 8W S81I I 8W GS 8W 0 WI

1-;:zoos~+-+-+-;., --+--+-"f-+--+--- ,'--+--+-'--+--+-l--'---+--+-11-+--+-11--:-,-+---1r-+--+-l-+-t-1-,,.--;.-.,--+-;-:GS"':+-1-EG2:S:-!-i:GS:=----+.OOP=~+-=oot=IOOP IWC 00 GS GS jSallBW BW sa11 I BW @! aw 0 WI

2009 I 1 I < I I I GS ' GS GS WOO - 0 0 1....- GS GS DOPW0/8W8WSBLOOP OOPSBI OOF GS WOBWWI 2010 I I 1 1 1 I GS j 0 0 0 0 0 1 GS SBI JSSi-BW 8W 0 10 SBli ~ ilS" BW 0 WI

i-::::..:..:'l--+--t-,-+-l-+--+--+--+-+--~.-+--, +--+--+-+-l-+---+--+--'--+-+-1--:---+--t--t-t--+--+---t--:,c-i-, +--t--+---,:=-=-1-, .--t--t--=-t - l t ' l r- ~

I • I ! • I UpdallnglCotn>Ction NotK: I 1 1 I I i 1 1 I I I I

1 U/091 GoM,_I Uodall to sl>ow 2009 status & u": s.519" linlno ol 48 & ~ OAC. I I I I I I I I I I

nena- WEI' YIST~Y SUl,IW.RY by LS 2008 0,4C m 'n 12-11-10 (Z))U.S Tal>N"""'· 1' IOI)' PrmlOn•• t

I I

VS SllJI , Wa!Mtt G~. NY t1y l..AIT'/ ~k«" l9Cenl updaiS>g ay OACrea

©

FROM:

LOCATION:

SUBJECT:

INTERNATIONAL SALT COMPANY

July 23, 1982

Brinefield Sumrnar.y Report

Marshall S. Held

Watkins Glen Refinery

Geophysical Surveying of Galler.ies 3 and 4, 5 and 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Plus Wells 51 and 7

Listed below is a summary of the data generated from geophysical surveys recently performed by Gearhart.

Well #

34

43

44

35

36

Date

6/23/82

6/24/82

6/22/82

7 /7 /82

6/25/82

Type Log

Caliper

GR-Neutron

Inspection

Caliper

GR-Neutron

Inspection

Caliper

GR-Neutron

Insp<0ction

Caliper

GR-Neutron

Inspection

Caliper

GR-Nen t rnn

Inspection

G A L L E R Y 3 and 4

DepthLogger (ft.)

2411

2312

2586

Bottom Lor,p,ed Interval (ft.)

2410

2352

2'.)44

23)c0

2224

2218

2584

2574

2570

Top Logged Interval (ft.)

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

G A L L E R Y 5 and 6

2667

2382

2664

2554

2570

2380

2362

2359

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

SURF

Sl!RF

Casing/ From/ Liner(in): To(ft.)

5 1/2": 2350/SURF

5 l/2": 2219/SURF

8 5/8": 2572/SURF

8 5/8": 2667 /SURF

5 1/2": 2561/SURF

B 5/8": 2360/SURF

'. --1

~ . ' .1 ;· ;:-. : ~'-,

I· J " .

', -'

Geophysical Surveying Galleries Continued: pai:1e 2

G A L L E RY 5 and 6 (continued)

Bottom Top Depth- Logged · Logged

Well Logger Interval Interval Casing/ From/ II ~ !).'_Ee Log (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Liner (in): To(ft.)

38 6/25/82 Caliper 2535 2532 SURF 5 1/2": 2508/SURF

GR-Neutron 2510 SURF

Inspection 2506 SURF




G A L L E R Y 7


GR-Neut. ron 2450 SURF



Inspection 1790 SURF 5 1/2": 17 91 /SURF

GALl.ERY 8

48 7/6/82 Caliper . 2812 2808 SURF 8 5/8": 2812/SURF



50 6/ 30/82 Caliper 2835 2832 SURF 8 5/8": 2835/SllRF

GR-Neut.con 2834 SURF


G A L L E R Y 9

·" 47 6/30/82 Caliper 2714 2712 8 5/8": 2714/SURF SURF

\...... GR-Neutron 2.712 SURF


Geophysical Surveying Galleries Continued: j)Sge 3

G A T, L E R Y 9 (continued)

Bottom Top Depth-. Logged Logged

Well Logger Interval Interval Casing/ From/ _JL Date Type Log (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Liner (in): Ta (ft. 2




56 7/1/82 Caliper 284() 2838 SURF 8 5/8": 2840/SURF



G A L L E R V 10

52 6/22/82 Cali11er 2736 2734 SURF 8 5/B": 2733/SURF





Insj)ection Z740 SURF

51. 6/29/82 Caliper 2777 2774 SURF 8 5/8'" 2777 /SURF



7 7/8/82 Caliper 1323 1320 SURF 7" 1150/SURfi'

GR-Neutron 1134 SURF 5 112": 1133/SURF


Rev'n of: 8/8/1 O to include 2009; DAC.

Well#:

Filename: Mining History by Well '84-'09 from Sol'n Mining Rpts rev 8-13-10.xls Tab Name: Annual Data-Sol'tn Mining Rpts

Well 58 (South Field)

US Salt, LLC, Watkins Glen, NY David A Crea, P.E.

..... ,·,. ·:r.

. ''· .. ~~. ·;: .. .

; ....... . . •

. · ... · .. '."':""

·: .. -:·

-.: ,., ... ,.

. .•.·.

. ....... .

··.'.:

. .. · ... -::•'. . . "

li · . . ·- .·

.. , ·.··· . : <·~.< .·

·.·.· ·~:

. : ·.: ·.·.=::.,· .

. .... ·.·· ..

. .... ".·;.··

.1:' • :: •. i'· ,.

. _,·

. ·~·'.\:~i.~o> " •,

.. ~ · ..

.• .~:.

!-.

...

.· .. · .. ·1-:i ... ~··· ..

. ·.; '·' ·-·

· ... ··

..:·.

.-·..:..:., :.':,,

J .<!.

,, ·i .;·., .

.... '.~ J..;ARLY .HISTORY

"· ··'· . -~:.

· ·wri~•P; r9of a pi.unp waa purchased, &I1d water •as first pum;:ied: . . 1 P ~t6• [j. ·well cl~ae to cur boil~!;' room. Later 1 t was pumped ln. ··. No. 8 "ell at the ex tr8Jilo. so~th' ond .of our field• Thl re ilr.s been /l~ means of.)1~pplyiriri .wat~r. to wells in ti.e plapt area elnl' e l9J.3

.,: :·wiien deep,· 'i'e .. ;l.l pumps VJere .1riitalled 11ot each well. ' . . '· . . . .. .

·, ..

. ·. . f'rciil! lQ9) uti'~ll l')JJ brin~· Wile fOl;'Cl!d frOIJl the differunt wel'!°a :by air prai111~1'e.,_ .. A )/41.ilch air line.was lowered in the ~ublng t.o·a deptn or: approx1m·a: .. e1y l?oo: .f11.11t• ~'ran: 90 to 100 lbs. air pre:sl!ure ·~!II.• ma it•.~¥.-~n•.d., .wfoicQ. ·.~·9i'(>eq ·.l:>tina 1ilto e ta.nl! noa.r thti ·top of each q,~rfickf :.c})tJ.JA:;l.ie~e. it. floll'.t.U b7.,6J;-ayiJ,~1 .. ~o a ~m11on reoeivint; tank •

. . . :.· .. 1'h~:.;(·i.~t~'.;_'d~~i{ ~~i.{'~~~-- .. ~~f;~ ;.:~~~~!!~~·during 1933 1n we'll;t . : .. -4•.:'.'?;i::;;~;~o,~;;L~l·~119i;e!.!),l\!~_A~d •. Starting in 193.S, as well•·.:

.. 12, 1:~ .••. ili, :l:f~ ,~-~·.il••l'li4:"~~,.~e:r.e .cirllled ·in the new field; : deep loll. ).>,\CPS wor~:.,i'll.•'t.'i;;l).,1.1;,: !Ai.)il: tu la me tnod is uaed at the v e• seot~. · · :,;\~f;, · .,

Dw:"i1~e .l ~..;..Lr iiiUMP ·lil.~t :1nd o t v.l'octuc t lon. wai:i 1iitroduoed, :/. an..t dJ'11'lfilg·.o'.C. ·No·• •,eo ·well :was a~til!do Th1il · oallit. tor an lndlvt~·:·

.· · ... dual ~jf 6.qilipres•1:1r ~a-t the wel1 Q:r!d • .,:i.,,:t;a1*1ng a~ air cushion ,al:.' ;,t.;:\.!;.~f!: · ·i· ',~:~9f:l ·71l'.'l;~.i~ ~h~11 to pre'!~n~ ~1,~~-. ff:;~.of:_.;alt and.~:;.;: "'l<:i :;,-,.;._ Jvi):;q .. ,CAt'J,.(l.15}'F<i\.\dli · bti~iltt .$1,tpp]1 · r-· ,,,~-.-.: -'. . .. "'

~w{Ht~.'.' •.j ..•...•

·" ""

. ·~::

~ ..

C·

•

D

Withheld / CCI

E

SYRACUSE

f-4

--- -·------- ·------ - .. -

WEll 58 2011 SOMl'R - --+-...

f - 3/ 2

"' - ..... - "" .. - ..... • ... -.-... -----.. -... •-·--.. ·--.:· ... ·----- Wl:U. SI :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: ... :-:-:-:·:-:- 200I SOMUI .;t:_::,2~:':· --------- ---- ------- --------- -_ _ ________________ T ____ _

... -... -...... -- .. -5

- -- ---------·----------------:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:=:=:=:=:::=:=:=~=%~!'_ - - - -- ---------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------... -------------_-______________________________ - - -- -- - - - - - - ... - -------- --- ---------- ------------.---.-

-·-

----------- - .. -- ---- - - - - -------------------

I

-7 ™

-z-

(

L

= /' - ~

___ _. __ .... ____ _

- - - - -

w

... _____________ _ ~- --------------------- ----- ------- ------- --- ---------------- --- -- --------- -------- -------- -- -- ----- --- -- -----~"""'·- - - - - -- - - ----- -----. ------- ... ---------------------T-- __ ... ___ _ _ ... ___________ _ --------------------- _._ - -- ______________________________________________________ _

~--:-: -: : :=:=: =:=:=: =:=:=:= :-:= := := :=:=: =:- =: =:=:-:=::.:: :-:::: =:-:---:-:-:-:= :=:: := :=: =:-WW. 58

- - - - 1"9 ~ -~"'-v-~ f-3/1 ______ ...______ ___________ __ ---------------- -- --- ----- ---------T---••----~------------------------------ --- ------- ------- - -- -----·---- ------ ----------- --------- ----------- ---------------------______________________________________________________________________________ --c=~"'='t;:c;-::=.~·- --- - - --- --

- -- - - - - - - ------------·------~--- - - ------------------------------------------ ----------·------------ WELL M 1998 SOf'Wt

c f - 1/2 ----~---- -------------·--------------·-------~-~--------------T- - ----- ----..-- - WELL 09

1997 SONAR

____ .t, ___ _ -:_- ..... __ _ ---------------·

----------- -------------------------------------- -------------- --------------------------- - --------- ---- -- -------~----------------- ------- --------------F- 1/1

____ ... ... ___ ... ___ ... _ _ Oll>-- 264J -"------'------"'"---"'"-----~------'-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:---- - - - - - : : : : : : - - - - ________ .... ______ -----_-_-_-_- -_-_-_-__________ ----- -_-_- - - - --- __________ - ----- -_- --- -_- -_-_-_- -_-____ -----_- --- ---------- --- -_- -... -.... - ----- - - - - - - - - - - .... - - .. ----------------- --- -----------------------------------------------.------------------------ ------- --------------------------.--r--- ----------------------------------.-------- -- ----_____ _. __ __ ___________ _

- ~ - --------- ---------------------------- ---------.- - ----- ---- E -------~------------------------- -- -- - ------- ----------·----·- ---------------- --- --- ----------------- -- -- - ---------------------~- ------- ----- --------------------------------------- ---------

=~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~I~~~I~~~I~I~~~~~i~I1~~~I~i~~~~~I~~~I~i~I~III~I~I~~~~~~I~~~~~~~I~~~~I~IIiIIIiII;iI~~~II~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~~~~l~l~~~I~I~~~;~I~ ~~~~=~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~--------- --------------------------~--------------T·--------- - ------- _.a, ... -- -- ------------0-4 ... - - - - ..... - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - _____________ -_-____________ _

===~========~=~=~~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=:=~==~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~;=~~;~~~~~=~=~=~=~=~~~=~~~=~~~~~=~=~===~=~=~=~=~~=~=~===~=~===~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=:=~ ::::=====~=-:-:-:-:-:-=-=-=-:-:-:-=-:-:-:::: ----~----T--- -·--------

- _. __ .. • 0- J --- -- -t.---------y--------------- -- - ... - - - - .. - - ---------T·- -- ... ---.-------- - ... - - __ .a,---- ---- --- - ---- - ... - - --- ---------y-~--- --0- 2

-----~ - ~-- ·- ---.&.- ---- - -- - .. - ---.. --- --- ------T----•••--•--- -----

FORMATION

MSL= O

GENESEE

TULLY HAMIL TON

MARCELLUS ONONDAGA ORISKANY MANLIUS/

HELDERBERG RONDOUT

BERTIE CAMILLUS

TOS SYR ACUSE

BO S VERNON

= =

O'

5 15' 5 45'

1,4 60'

1,560 '

!;~~g:

1,800' 1,86 4 ' l, 960' 2,040'

2,7 90'

TOW +814 MSl

TOW + 751 'lrilSL

SECTION

=

SENECA STORAGE 6"l.l.ERT 2

=

>ENECA STORAGC GAU.ERT 1

r::.-e TOWe e TOW I +537 llSl I

~581- 'I

-- -.

A- A' LOOKING NORTH

TOW +475. WSL

@

· -- -· ---+--- -·----+ -~- +- --- · · ---- .. ---.-.:"lC -.:r-

. - -_____ .. __ ~ __ , ~-- ~- -~--

_______ .. __ _. __ .. ~----------------------------------- ---- ---------------- --- ------------------------- ---------- ---- ---- --------- -------- --- ------------ ----------------------------------

_._ - ._ - - .... -_________ ... _ ______ __ __ ___ ._ ___ _ ------- ---- ------------------ -------------------------- -- ----- ------------------ ---- ------------ ----------------- - - - -_-_-_-_-________________________________________________ -------------_-:_-_______ _

-------- ------------------------------------ ------ ----------------------- ----------------- ---------- ------- -- -- ---- -- --- ---------- ----- ------------ ---------------:::: - : - :-:-:-:-:-: --:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:---:-:-:------.... ------- - - - - - ------ --- ------------r -------- ---- --- - ---- ------ -- - -- - ~ - - -____________________ _ __ .... ____________________ _ ------- ---- ------------------ ---- ---- ------- ------- --------------------- ---- -- -------------------- --------- ----- ------------------- -------- ---- ------ ---- ---------- ---------------------- - - -- - - -----_________________________________________________________________________ _

-------- ---------------------------,--~--r -- ---------------------------------- --- ---------------- - 4 - - _._ - ._ - _. __ ..._ --- --r---_:----- r--- - ....... --

- ---- -- -- -T ---... -... ·-WEll "" 198 1 5()PrM

WW. "" 19711 SONAR

---------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- --- ---------- ----- --------------- - - --------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------------------------..... - - r- - .... ----- --------------_, __ ... __ .. --------

------------- -

--·----

---------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------------ ----- ----- ------llELL ,,.,-_- __ ------ - ---- - - - - - ___________________ - - _-_-________ _

--:-:---- --:---:-:-:-:-:-: :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: tf!7_ ~= _-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-t:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:---:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: -:: :=_:-: :=:=-: :=: =:=:=: =~ :=: =.: =:= :==-==-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-~ -:-:-;-: -:-:-:---------------------_! ___ -----------=-=-=:=::::: ::: :_ ::::: ------------- - _-_-_ ... _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:.::-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-£-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-_-__ -====-= -===-==== ::: ::::: ::::: =====-===-======== :::::: :::::::::::::::: :::: :: ::::::::::::::::::3::::::::::::::::::: =~============== --- --- -- ----------- ------------- -- -- ------ ------------------: =:= :=- :=:=:: :=: =:=:=:=: :: :=: :-:;. ::::-:;. :=:=: =:=: =: =: ::::: := :=: ::: :=:=: =:=: ::: :=:= :=:=:=:=:=:=:t=:=:=-:;. :=:=:=: =:=: =:= :=:= := :=:=:= :=

--- ----- ----- ------ ----------- -- ---- -- --- -- ------------- ·------_-____________ -----________________________ ----___________________________________________________ -_-________ -_------------------·---------- ---------- --------~- --- .... --- ----------------------~-------------:-:-:-:-:-:- -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-1-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: --- -

--:-: -:-:-:-:-:-: ... -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-c-:-:-:-:-:-:-: -:-:-: :-:-: :-:-:-:-- - - -- -------------------- ----------- ---------- -- ----------- - - -- -- T -- - - "" - '"' --- - ..- - --r o- - -.- - -- ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _-_ ... _ - _ ... _

ESTIMTED LOCATION Of FRAC CONNECTION

--------- • ----.&.----~----T-------------..- - --.- - -- -

---- .. ------ - --- -~ ---

OTD--2859

-- ----- --------

----- --- ---.. - ---

~

- Oll>-- 2859

- --'-------~

.... ___ _ _ -----------~--~--------------------------------------------____________ .,.

___ _. __ _____ _ -------------------------- ------------------- ------------- ----------------- --------------------__________________ -- ,... - ... - -

---------~--------------.... ---~ -.... -llELL 31

1978 SONAA

,

---- ---- -_ __________________ .... _ _._ ------ ----- -------- ------ ___ ... -------------------------------- ----------------------- ----- --------------- --- --- ----------- ------ --------- --- -------------- -- ------------------------------------------ ----- -· ------- ------------- -- -- ----------~--r--------- -------..----------

---------- -- ---------------------------- ----------- ------- ---- --------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --------------- ----- ------ -- ----------------- -------- ------ ----------- ---- ----------- -----------------------------------------.--..---------- ------- ----------------- ..--~- r

------L---------~--~-~--------------------- -..--·

~-~--~--_.c-::_ ... :-~-=-----.------ --~ ------ -- --- ------------- ________________________ ... ------------------------------------------------------... -_-_______________________ -----~ -- - - - .. - ----------------------------------------- ------ -------------------- -------- - --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ----- -------- --------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- -- ------------ --- -------- ---- --- -------- --------------------- - ------- -------------- ------ ----------- ----------------- ----- ------------------- ----------------- -------------------------------------_-------_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- -- -- -·-------------------------- - ------ ------_-_ ... _____ .. ---- - - -- --- - - - - -.- ------------------------- ______________________________________ -

------ ~ -- -- - ---- ----- - ---------.., - '"' ------... - ... '"' ... - ... ------ ---... - ... -----... - ---- --------... - ... - ... - .. - ...... _ ... _-_ ... • IL - ~ • ... - - -----... --- ----- - - ... _ ... _- ---- -

::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::=::-=:=:~:=:-:-:-::-:-=-=-~ ... =-~ = -.J ------ -- --------------------------------- ---------- ------------.. __ -----... _ .. -... -------------------... --------------_ ... _ .. _ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----- ------ ------------------- ----------------- ---------------------.. _ -------_ .. -__ .,. ----------------------------_ ... _ ----------------- ----- ---------------------------------------_ --------- ----- ------- ------------- ------------------ ---- --- -------------- -- --------------------------------- --- ---- ------- ----- ------------ - -~---------------- ----------------- --- ------- ----.--- - - ---------------------------- ----------.---------------------------------~--------. - -__ .. _________________________ ------___________ ---------------~------- - - - - - - - -

---------------- -------- --------------- --- -- --- ---- -----~-------- --------------------- ------------------- · ---------------- ------------------------------ -------------- --------------------------------- -- ------ --- --------------------- -- --------------- ----------------- ----- ------------------- -------------- ----------_______________ "";. ___ '"' - .. - - ... - - '"' .. - - ... '"' .. '"'-. • '"'T - - • ... "" .... _ .. _-_ .. _• .- - ----r'"' ... '"' WEi'.J..._fB __ ... _ ... _ .. _ ... _-... -... --- ..... ------- 19711 SOHM --- - ----r

----------~ -~- --J--_.__ .. __ - - -- - - - - .. - - - ----- ..... •r - -- -·--- - · - --- - - - OTt>--2649'

- -~-J ___ -- -

-----~----~-----------------~-~-----+ - ... - .. • --.. -----... -,,..-... -,-----.,_-.-~-----r--'"' ... ---... --- - .............. "< "' ... ,.. ... - - -

OID-- 2808

@

--==-: 7 ---"----t-~--_..;.----1---.,.-----L --=?" .:::- =-=- =

._ - -.. -...-----

•

- -- - -- - - --

- ----------- ----------

- - - -------

__ ... _..J ________ _

.... - -- -

OT0•-2082

-- - - - - ------- _ ...

-------------- --------~------ --- ~ ,--~-,------.--~--

-------

- --- - ----------F- 4 _ .. _ _, __ .. _..,_

-----r----..-

F- 3/ 2

------------ ------------------------------- ------- --------- --- --- --------- ---- --- --- -- -- -- ------ ------ --------------- -- -------- -- ----------- -------------- --------- ---- ----------------- -- ----------------- --- ----- -----r----r-~

F- J/1

------------- ------------ ---- ----- ---------------~-•o:-·c- - -- ----------- ----- ... -- - -- --- ---------------------- ----

WELL 27 1978 SONAR

---- ----- -- -----------------------F- 1/2

--------------------------------------- - - - -

F-1/1

--------------------_-_ .. _-_-_ .... _________ .... _-_-_. __ -. - -- - ... ,_ .. - - - - - - - - - - ------- - - - -- --

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::======~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~~=~=~= ------------- ----- --------------------------- --- ----- -------------------- ------- -- ------ ------------- --- --------- ------------------------------ .... --------- ----------------.,. ----- ----------------,.. ---------.. ---.... ----------------... ------- ------- o:; --------------_-

\._WELL 23 J-----J- ... ... J __ ._ __ - -~- ---·----·----·- L-- _ ... ___ P:~ -- .... ----~ ... - 1995 SONAR -- -.... --- ------ - -- -- - -- -- - - -- ----- --- -- - ---- - -- -- ----- - - - -- -

0-2 -. - --... :..,-... -.,------.__ --- - - -"-... -... ~-... _ ... _ ... ---------- ... ___ _._ -- - - - - - - ... - ---'-... -... -------------------... ---... -------... ---------r ---------,..-----... -0- 1

== -- rm: == =r =

-----•

WELL# & OPERAfflGCOMPANY WELL# 27 US SALT WELL # 29 US SALT WELL# 30 NYSEG WE LL #31 NYSEG WELL # 45 NYSEG WELL#46 NYSEG WELL # 58 IM

))' 200 100'

';C AI E KEY

OT0--2538 -

DETAIL FOR WELL 58 and

200 100 so

KEY TOS BOS TOC TOW CTD OTD TOF BOF

TOP OF SALT - BOITOM OF SALT - TOP OF CAVERN

SENECA STORAGE GALLERIES 1 & 2

')CAI E KEY - TOP OF WELL CURRENT TOTAL WELL

- ORIGINAL TOTAL WELL DEPTH DEPTH

DATE ORIG TD . DRILLED FROM GL 412711957 2638

Jun-58 2684 1211511997 2540

41111961 2806 1967 2870

1112911993 2082 1011711992 2425

NOTES 1 DISTANCES BET\v'EEN \v'EL LS ARE

MEASURED IN FEE r 2 DEP THS ARE MEA SURED FROM DRA\v' ING FROM G~OUND LEV EL

2000-00- 0I -11

- TOP OF FRAC BOITOM OF FRAC

CS - CASING SEAT SCS SURFACE CASING SEAT BTS - BRINE TU BING STRING CENTERLI NE OF ORIGINAL DRILL FIRST RECORDED SONAR SURVEY SECOND RECORDED SONAR SURVEY TH IRD RECORDED SONAR SURVEY FOURTH RECORDED SONAR SURVEY FIFTH RECORDED SONAR SURVEY SIXTH RECORDED SONAR SURVEY SEVENTH RECORD ED SONAR SURVEY EIGHTH RECORDED SONAR SURVEY

DATAONINERGYMIDSTREAM/USSALT WELLS NEAR WATKINSGLEN, NY,USA SHALE & LIMESTONE

EU.EV@ Gl 476 605 751 688 717 537 814

. . -MAX LAST SONA R DIRECllONAL

STAlUS PRESS PSI API # NAO 83 LAT/LONG DATE SURVE (DATE OlHER LOGS & DATES P &A NA 31--09 7--03-891 42.41 58557 / 76.8909174 4/26/1978 . -P & A NA 31--097--03-940 42.420181 76.89441 CALJNUCCL 7164 CAL 9/163 PERF LOG 7116 71

MONITOR NA 31--097~1 -188 42.41 58552 I 76.8961632 121 1811997 P & A NA 31 --097~1 -189 42.41 59198176.8946671 7/20/1978 412511961 -·-P & A NA 31--097~ 1 -201 42.4155410 / 76.89S4711

ACTillE I NG 1350 31 --097~1 -202 42.4155799 I 76.8917668 12121/1 993 11118/1970 DRILLED OUTITEST NA 31--097-21-467 42 41 6054176 899519 3/2512011 9/31.:009 ' GRISBUMK:RVERT 10109

ND DATE REVISION BY CHK APPR ~

L IMESTONE

SAL T

SHALE

FOSSILI FEROUS L IMESTONE

SANDSTONE

L IMESTONE 8. DOLOMITE

SHALE & DOL OMITE

~o~p5~/=12=/~l~O ~D~R~AW~IN=G~R~EL=E=A~S~E=D~~=-----·-~J~M=R~L~.D~L-D~INERGY FIN~RUUS~Gsro~GE, llC 1 6/23/ l TITLE I NFORMATION CHANGE J MR L D. L D ____________ _____ _ 2 9126/l ADDED ESTIMATED CAVERN SHAPE. 'w'ELL 58 J MR L.D L D 3 4/6/11 UPDATE CAVERN SHAPE: WELL 58 IDRM EL.) JMR L.D. L. D 4 4/19 / 11 CHANGED ALL DEPT HS TD BELOW SURFAC[ J MR B.M. B.M

AS NOTED

A- A' (WEST- EAST) FIELD SENECA STORAGE AND 2 , AND WELL 58

VERTICAL SECTION SOUTH BRINE GALLERIES 1

2000 -00-01 - 12-16 SHT l 4

Withheld / CCI

F

Withheld / CCI

April 1, 2011

Cas

Company: Well: Field: County:

I

Inergy Midstream No. 58 US Salt Schuyler

Cement Bond Evaluation

New York

Service: HR Vertilog and Segmented Bond Log w/GR/CCL/VDL

Date Logged: P~·essure:

DrillerF~ TD: Logger'~ TD: Casing Si~e:

24-Mar-2011 0 PSI 2183F 2068' 9.625"

HR Vertilog: A total of 49 joints were inspected from the surface to 2159 ft. No metal loss features exceeding the 20% threshold were identified. Centralizers on the casing were located at the following depths: 916rr 1318', 1722'r 2083'r and 2126'. The bottom of an outer casing was located at 163.75 ft.

SBT/VDL/CCL: The ,Segmented Bond Tool was run from 2168' to the surface. The GR indicates the top of the cavern at 2095'. It appears that there is some cement clinging to the pipe that extends into the cavern space. There is likely a build-up on the ID of the casing causing one section of the tool to lose pipe contact from 2168 up to 2096'. The cement bonding is good in the other 5 sections. The cement bonding and distribution is excellent from 21oor to 1810,. There is poor bonding from 1810' to 1670' but bonding conditions again are excellent from 1670rup to 1240' except for a small void at 1325r. This pattern continues to the surface with intermittent sections of excellent bond and sections of poor bond. Generally the cement job will provide excellent vertical isolation for the operation of the well.

Dale Cele Baker Hughe~

H

Coi!iiductedl for:

Run date: Report date:

"' I log i

March 24, 2011 March 27, 2011

rvey

Inspection Date: March 24, 2011 Job ID: US597518 Report Revision: Final

fi11ergy Mldstrel?<m US Saft

Bake~· Atias RR 4, Box640

Buckhannon, VVV 26201

HR VERT/LOG INSPECTION FINAL REPORT

St;;itior.i Tommy DoweU Tel. (304} 472 - 2460

AElaiyst: Dave Jacobson Te!. (618) 393 - 2919

Page i

© 2009 Microline Tech11ol0@1 Corporation

fm:urn~ Midstref!f!m US Salt

Table of Contents


Executive Summary .................................................................................. iii

1. Job fnforn1ation ................................................................................... 1 1. 1. llVell Data ............................................................................ 1 1.2. Sewice Data .................................. , .................................... 2 1.3. Pressure Cafculations ......................................................... 2 1.4. Equipment Data .................................................................. 3

2. Casing Configuration ........................................................................... 5 2.1. Casing Segments ............................................................... 5 2.2. Externaf Ca.sings ................................................................. 5

3. Feature List ......................................................................................... 7

4. Casing Con1ponents ............................................................................ 8 4.1. Hardware ............................................................................ 8 4.2. Perforations ........................................................................ 9 4.3. Repair Intervals ................................................................. 10 4.4. Miff-related Anomalies .......... ., ......... ., ............................... 10 4. 5. Coffar Anomalies ............................................................... 11

5. [i/fetaf Loss Features .......................................................................... 12 5.1. Sufface LocatiotJ ..... , .... ~ ...................... # ............................... 12 5.2. Depth-Based Analysis ................................... ................... 12 5.3. Pressure-Based Analysis .................................................. 14 5.4. Feature Type ......................................................... ........... 15 5.5. Joint Summmy .................................................................. 16

6. System Qualification and Qualily Control ......................................... 18 6. 1. System Qualification ......................................................... 18 6.2. Best Effotts ....................................................................... 18 6.3. Analysis Quality Controf .................................................... 18 6.4. Continuous Process Improvement ................................... 1'8

Attachments


Page ii

© 2009 Microline Technology Corporation

Executive Summary

Inergy fiffid£tream US Saft

HR VERT/LOG /NSPECT!Of\J FINAL REPORT

On March 24, 201 'i, Baf{er Atlas, opera.ting fro111 Buckhannon WV completed a HR Vetiilog magnetic flux leakage (MFL) casing inspection survey 011 the Inergy Midstream US Salt US Salt #58.

A total of 49 individual joints of casing were identified during the inspection survey. Within this reprnt, the tenn "casing" is intended to roean the downho!e tubu!ars which are l:he subject of the srnvey, and which may include well casings, liners or production tubing.

A total of 0 metal loss features exceeding the 20% reporting threshold were identified during the HR Verti!og survey. Of the 0 to ta! metal loss features, 0 were identified as internal features, and O were identified as extema! features.

A total of 0 metal loss features exhibited predicted de1Jths exceeding 50% of wail thickness. The maximum clepth among all metai loss features was 0%.

A total of 0 metal loss features exhibited ERF values exceeding i .0. The maximum ERF among all metal loss features was 0.000.

This Final Report is intended to serve as an overall sum many of the inspection results. The accompanying lnSight Data CD contains a comprehensive Feature list which represents the complete findings of the HR Vertilog casing survey.

Inspection Date: March 24, 2011 Job !D: US597518 Report Revision: Final

Page iii

© 2009 f\/licroline Technology Corporation

Inergy lllfidstream US Salt


1. Job Information

Baker Atlas completed a HR Vertiiog casing inspection survey on the Inergy Midstream US Salt #58 on March 24, 2011. The job parameters are summarized in the following well, service and equipment data tables.

1 . 1 . Well Data

The following well data and casing records were provided. by representatives of Inergy Midstream.

Table 1. Well Data

APINumber

location

Sectio!'! NIA Township NIA NIA ------'------

Elevatkms ----~--------------- -----

Log Measured From

Diriililflg Measlllredl Fmm

FRlilid Fresh Water


0.00 foot _, ___________ - --- ------------------------- ~------- -----------------------------

0.00 feet

0.00 feet

G.L.

M.G. Height Above Datum 2.00 feet ·- --"------------------- ----------

K.B. Height Above Datum --------- ----'-------

0.00 feet

Opsi 2170.00

From

0.00 ft

Page 1


1.2. Service Data

Inergy Mffdsttff:iJ8i511 US Saft ,,~

U.:J


The Baket· Atlas field setvices are summarized in the table below.

Table 2. Service Data

Mr. Barry Moon

Buckhannon WV .~-------·--·---·--·····~---

970'1

Loggi111g ltrufoW1Jnati©n

[--···-·---·--·--·--·-·- ·-·--=-· ... I HVRT===--=-=~ ===~-=~-- ---C,!Jl!~!'!lio•U !!'lteNl!ll I 2i 59.20 feet

Additional SeNices ----i--~!~}~t -- -- ····-----Remi;;i!'ks:

Thank lfOU for choosing Baker Arias. Crew on your location : M. Cutlip , Dave Wm. JCGR 8.5" ran to 2170. NIA= not applicable.

Engineer's remarks are included above. While rm outer casing string is listed or1 the log heading, an outer casing string exists, size, weight, and grade unknown. log depth of bottom of this string: 163.75 ft. Outer casing string collars are present cm the Fl signal in some intervals, see 42.64 ft., for example. Centralizers are present at the following depths: 915.15, 1318.@l, 1121.81, 2083.@3, mm:! 2125.11 ft.

1.3. Pressure Calculations

The following information was provided by Inergy Midstream for use in pressure ca!cuiations.

Burst Pressure Calculation

~nteraction Criteria

Inspection Date: March 24, 2011 Job ID: US597518 Repo1t Revision: Final

- Fixeai BW Ratio 6.0T x 6.0T

Page 2

© 2009 fvlicroline Technology Corporation

1 .4. Equipment Data

Inergy Midstream US Salt us #58

HR VERTILOG iNSPECTION FINAL REPORT

The following Baker Atlas equipment assets were utmzed in the petformance of the inspection services.

Table 3. Equipment Data

Seriesi Number to 9-5/8 Inch HRVRT 96 Fl {- 96 DIS Too! -------~----------------··---------1----- --------------- -------------- ----------

Ele1ctl'onics Sef'ies Number

Microvision 32-blt 4.3.2.0 Acquisition Software

Analysis Software ~----~----- ------------~-------------·---!

------- ------------- ~


insight 2.2.5.2276

Page3 Baker Atlas


l51!ergy Midstream US Saft

Series 4995


High Resolution Vertiiog Too! Schema.tic

I l 2rS.,S?ir~1

!.47L:') nni:n hfLA.Kt~UF

LEMGTH


;~ 4'993f/:.., 6B.87In

58_l1in f ~ 4 YS fl'H"Ci: . '

499SQB 58.691n,

[7,491 rnrn;

Page 4

¢2.63in [ 67 r-nm J

I \l'iHEEl TFUWEL RAJ,lGE

-~~-~- 5.3G· fn p 35 rnn-~J !\lrAX 4.00 iri {l 02 M.iN

rnsc. MEASURE POfr~): 94.T bin. [2407 mmj

FL (,t£ASURE f'!)JNTS: ft,Y~t,,t,,,L: t;.ts in [2' I 4? R/-'\DU),L: ;'34.6; in ['2 ".£19 :r1t11} (JRCUfvt: fjL. .4 l ;~1 [2144 rnrnl

rnsc. !v\E1\SURE POiW: 38.t33 fr1. {9E;6 ~nn1J

FL IJ!EASLIRE POINTS: Ai<!AL: 2.S.SS !n [726 rnrnj Rf,._DfA.L 2~3.68 ·:~~i. [72B t·nn-~} ):=)RCJJf.A.: 28.413- i1·' .. ~723 1~nrnI

© 2009 Microline Tecl1nolog\1 Corporation

2. Casing Configuration

2.1. Casing Segments

fnerrgy !llUcffstream US Saft

HR VERTJLOG INSPECTION FINAL REPORT

For the purpose of this report, a casing "segment" refers to an interval of casing with consistent physical properties and operating parameters. The concept of casing segments is used within the context of this report to define casing intervals for the purpose of pressure-based analysis, including burst strength analysis and pressure ratio calculations.

Casing segments with consistent nominal wall thickness (T), external diameter (D), maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP), internal design pressure (Pi), and specified minimum yield strength (SMYS} are defined as "major'' casing segments.

MFL inspection technology alone does not conclusively identify or quantify the parameters which define a major casing segment. It is therefore the responsibility of the well operator to provide the appropriate casing specifications in advance of the survey for the purpose of pressure-based analysis and reporting.

The high-resolution MFL technology employed for this survey may, under certain conditions, !lrovicle data which indicates a casing parameter that differs from the operator's reprnted values. Such discrepancies, typically in the form of a suspected weight or grade variation, will be brought to the attention of the operator by designating these intervals as "minor" casing segments. A minor segment is therefore identified by the analyst as a subset of the major casing segment reported by the we!! operator.

If the casing weight or grade of a minor segment can be reliably ascertained by the ana!yst, it wm be noted in the inspection database. However, only the major segment parameters provided and/or approved] by the operator wm be used for the purpose of pressure-based analysis and reporting. if the well operator subsequently determines to re-specify a minor casing segment for any reason, it then becomes, by definition, a major segment, and the data over this interval must be re-interpreted accordingly.

Major casing segments will be identified and indexed numerically (Le. 1, 2, 3) by increasing depth, while minor segments will be identified with respect to the major segment in which they occur (Le. i .1, "! .2, 2.1 ).

The major and minor casing segments identified in the course of this survey are summarized tn the Casing Segment Report (on the accompanying CD).

2.2. External Casings

Any interval of casing positioned coaxially and external to the primary casing undergoing inspection is considered to be an "external casing" for the purpose of this report External casings do not directly affect the pressure-based analysis in the primary casing, so the presence of one or more external casings has no bearing on the determination of major or minor casing segments, as described above.

External casings can, however, directly affect metal loss feature sizing by altering magnetic interactions within the primary casing. Consequently, a!I external casing intervals must be identified and compensated for in the course of data analysis.


Page 5 Raker Atfas


fffljergy Midstream US Salt

f-!R VERT/LOG INSPECTION FINAL REPORT

The statt and end positions of aii extemai casings and rnajor/minor casing segments shall be reprnied as the logging depth whenever these positions can be reliably determined directly frrnn the inspection data. In the absence of sufficient log data, all casing positions 1,•vm be analyzed and repmied accoroling to the casing data provided by the well operator.

The extemal casings identified during this survey are smnmarized in the EKtemai Casing Repo1i (on the accompanying CD).


Page 6


3. Feature List

Inergy fllUdstret::m US Salt

HR VERT/LOG {NSPECT/ON FINAL REPORT

Casing "features" are defined as af[ of the downho!e casing components and anomalies identified during the inspection survey.

Features include components related to the physical construction of the well, such as collars, perforations, centralizers, repairs, and downhole hardware. Features also include individual casing anornalies, such as metal loss features, mill-related anomalies, and deformations.

The "Feature Ust" is simply a comprehensive list of all individual casing features identified during the survey, organized by their position within the well. The position of any feature is always reported as the logging depth to the mid-point, or centerline, of each feature.

The Feature Summary (Table 4, below) lists the casing features identified during the survey, summarized by category.

Table 4: Feature Summary

1111111-r><<siaceo_ Anomalies , __ -------------------t---------------------------- --·------ ·--- ---------------------

Features

The Feature list (on the accompanying CD) contains a complete iisting of the features identified during the inspection sun1ey, and serves as the database for aH of the individual sumtnaries, reports, and figures contained in this Fina! Report


Page?


4. Casing Components

Greergy Midstrna;m US Salt

1-iR VERT/LOG iNSPECT/ON FINAL REPORT

The category of "casing compcments" rnpresents three types of downho!e hardware features which contribute to the physical mal<e-up and functionality of the we!!, and two types of casing anomalies which do not fit within the conventional definition of metal loss features, as described in Section 5.

Casing components associated with downhole hardware include various mechanical features which routinely form part of the weil construction, such as collars, centralizers, perforations, mandrels and repairs. The casing joints themselves are analyzed separately, and are therefore not identified as casing "components" for the purpose of this report.

Casing components also include two types of features associated with casing anomalies which fall outside of the conventional metal loss feature definition. These features are mil!-related anomalies, which result from the casing manufacturing process, and collar anomalies, which are features associated specifically with the casing collar cormecticms.

The five types of casing components identified by the survey are described and summarized in the sections below.

4.1. Hardware

Casing han::!ware is determined to mean an~r physical downhoie hardware, other than the casing joints themselves, which comprise the downhoie well caisi11g below the log "zem" point, which is typically identified as the top of the master va~ve or casing flange. Wellhead components above the log zem point are not considered pan-I: of the casing or casing componerits for the purpose of this report.

Casing hardware irn::iudes components that serve to connect the casing joints together (e.g., coliarn), components affixed to the outside of casing (e.g., centralizers, scratchers, damps), and any class of downhoie tools or components which make-up integral to the casing (e.g., mandrels, DV toois, float collars, casing shoes, safety valves, casing packers).

Many casing hardware components represent a significant addition of ferromagnetic material, which adversely affects the tool's magnetic interactions with the casing body. As a result, metal loss anomalies in the casing body which ma~' occur in association with hardware, for example corrosion t.mder a centralizer, are not identified or sized as part of the standard am11lysis.

Inspection Date: March 24, 2011 Page 8 Job ID: US597518 Report Revision: Final © 2009 Microline Technology Corporation

!nerg}' flllidstrnaim US Salt

HR VERT/LOG INSPECT/ON FINAL REPORT

The Hardware Summary (Table 5, below} serves to summarize the casing hardware identified during the survey by type.

Table 5: Hardware Summary

0

0

0

Other

The Feature list (cm the accompanying CD} contains a comprehensive listing of individual casing harch•.tare components identified during the survey.

4.2. Perforations

Petiorations are intervals of the well casing in which perforations, slotted liners or other means of communication with the formation are located. Analysis of the st.mrey data wm serve to identify the beginning and end of the pe1forated intervals, but no attempt is made to ascertain perforation shot type, density, or phasing.

Metal loss anomalies which mair occur within the pe1ioratec! intervals are not identified or sized as part of the standard analysis.

The Perforated lnter'lfa! Summary (Table 6, below} provides a summaqr of the perforated intervals identified during the survey.

Table 6: Perforated Interval Summary

The Feature List (on the accompanying CD) contains a comprehensive listing of individual perforated intervals identified during the survey, including their start point, end point, and tota! length.


Page9


4.3. Repair !ntervals

f§'1!ergy Mid~tre<!im US Salt


Repair intervals are segments of the we!! that contain existing casing repairs at the time of the survey, such as an internal earning patch, or other form of repair sleeve.

Any metal loss anomalies which may occur within repair intervals are not identified or sized as part of the standard analysis.

The Repair Interval Summary (Tabie 7, below) provides a summary of the repairs identified during the survey.

Table 7: Repair Interval Summaw

T!1e Feature List (on the accompanying CD) contains a compre~1ensive listing of individual existing repair intervals identified during the survey.

4.4. Mill-related Anomalies

Mill-related anomalies are features in the casing body or weid metal resulting from the manufacttning process. Mi!l-reiated anomalies may be identified, but not sized!, as part of the standard analysis.

Mill-related anomalies are classified in two genera! categories:

i. Manufacturing Anomalies: manufactufing anomalies are features of the manufacturing process which occur in the casing body, sucl1 as laminations, inclusions, or scabs.

ii. Seam Weld Anomalies: Seam weld anomalies are features of the manufacturing process wl1ich occur in the casing seam weld (if presenl), such as incomplete fusion or lack of penetrntion.

The Mill-related Anomalies Summary (Table 8, below) serves to summarize the mm-related anomalies, organized by type.

Table 8: Mill-related Anomalies Summaw

Anomalies

The Feature List (on the accrnTipanying CD) contains a comprehensive listing of the mm-related anomalies identified during the survey.


Page 10 lfal<c.r Atlas


4.5. Collar Anomalies

Inergy A'lidstream US Salt


For the purpose of this report, casing "collars" are defined to include any means of mechanically coupling individual joints of casing together in a well. Collars include conventional casing connection methods utilizing a short extema! collar, as we!! as all types of "flush" joint connections, where both the male and female threads are integral to the casing.

Collars are employed to connect two joints of casing together, or to connect one end of a joint of casing to an integral downhole too!, mandrel, or other casing component. Any girth weld occurring below the master valve or casing flange is considered to be a collar, within this report.

The HR Vertilog survey may detect two types of anomalies associatecl with the collars:

i. Collar Anomalies: Metal loss anomalies occurring within the casing body, either under the coflar in the case of an external collar, or within the threaded connection interval in the case of a flush joint collar.

ii. Make-up Anomafies: Any MFL coffar signature that deviates in one or more material respects (e.g. signature length, amplitude, form) from the typical collar response in tlw well. For example, a collar signature with an atypically long "gap" between casing ends may indicate cross-threading, insufficient make-up torque, or improper seating, aff of which may be a possible sources of collar teaks.

Collar length is determined according to the length of the MFL signature, wf1ich typically exceeds the physical dimensions of the collar connection. Since collars contain threads and oilier complex metal gain/loss profiles, the capacity of MFL technology to detect and size metal loss features in the casing body may be diminished or eliminated' within the collar, depending on the collar type.

Accordingly, co!iar anomalies may be identified, but are not sized, as part of the standard analysis. If collar anomaly size is provided, the performance specification for anomaly sizing does not apply.

Collar anomalies identified during the survey are included in the Collar Anomaly Summary (Table 9, below), which serves to summarize these features by type.

Tabfe 9: Coffar Anomalies Summa1y

0 Collar Anomalies

48 Total Collars

The Feature Ust (cm the accompanying CD) contains a comprehensive listing of the ooliar anomalies and make-up anomalies identified during the survey.


Page 11 Baker Atlas


5. Metal Loss Features

Ur1Jergy f!llidstream US Salt

1-IR VERT/LOG /fl!SPECT!Of\f Ftf\!AL REPORT

Metal loss features are defined as 8inomalies in the casing body in which metal has been removed, typically as a result of corrosion or mechanical damage, such as gouging.

Metal loss features detected during the survey are summarized in this report by the following methods:

i. Swtace location: according to the swta.ce of origin, either intemal or external

ii. Depth-based: according to the depth of penetration

iii. Pressure-based: according to the effect on remaining strength of the casing

iv. Feature type: according to a classification based on length, width, and wall thickness

v. Joint summary: according to the most severe features identified per individual casing joint

5. i. Swiace location

The meta~ loss features detected during the survey are summarized according to their surface location, either internal or external, in the Swiace Location Summaq1 (Table 10, below).

Table 10: Surface Location Summa1y

Loss Features

0 Loss Features

The distribution of meta! !oss features according to their swface location is illustrated in a series of Swiace-Based Histograms (Attachment 5.1). Three histograms are presented:

"' Surface location: all metal loss features "' Surface location: internal metal loss features (\) Surface location: external meta! loss features

The vertical ands of each histogram corresponds to the log depth, and the horizontal axis corresponds to the rn.1mber of occurrences. Each horizontal bar in the histogram represents the total number of occurrences within a 40.00 foot interval of the weli.

5.2. Depth-Based Analysis

The meta~ loss features identified during the survey are summarized according to their depth of penetration (DOP) in the Metal Loss Depth-Based Summary (fable 11, below).

The individual metal ~oss features are summarized in the three columns on the left of the table according to their depth range and surface location. All individual meta~ loss features identified during the survey are represented in this section of the summary.

In the right hand column of the table, the maximum depth of any metal loss feature within individual joints of casing is summfuized. Where more than one meta~ loss feature is contained in a joint, only the

Inspection Date: March 24-, 2011 Job ID: US597518 Report Revision: Final

Page 12


Inergy Midstrna.rn US Salt

HR VERT/LOG fNSPECT/ON FINAL REPORT

feature with the maximum depth of penetration is reported, so that each joint of casing appears in the table only once.

Tabfe 11: Meta! Loss Depth-Based Summaty

l<»ss Depth N~mberof

Joints

Sd< 20% 49

20% Sd < 30% 0

0 0 l0%Sd < 40% 0

0 0 40%Sd< 50% 0

0 0 50%Sd<60% 0

0 0 0 60% s d < 10% 0

0 0 0 10% Sd< 80% 0

0 80%Sd (j

0 fora! 49

5.2.1. Maximum Depth

The distributiof! of meta! loss features within the we!! acr..,ording to their maximum depth of penetration is illustrated in a series of Maximum Depth Histagrams (Attachment 5.2:.'i}. Triree histograms are presented:

., Maximum depth: al! metal loss features " Maximum depth: internal meta! loss features " Maximum depth: eictemai meta! loss features

The vertical axis of each histogram corresponds to the KR Vertiiog Log depth, and trie horizontal axis corresponds to the number of occurrences. Each horizontal bar in the histogram represents the total number of occummces within a 40.00 foot interval of the well.

5.2.2. Depth Range

The distribution of metal loss features within the well according ta their depth range is illustrated in a series of Depth Range HistDgrams (Attachment 5.2.2}. Four histograms are presented:

" All metal loss features (all reported depths) "' Metal loss features with 20% :o; depth < 50% "' Metal loss features with 50% :;; depth < 80% ., Metal loss features with depth <:: 80%

The vertical axis of each histogram corresponds to the HR Vertilog Log depth, and the horizontal a;;ds corresponds to the number of occurrences. Each horizontal bar in the histogram represents the total number of occurrences within a 40.00 foot interval of the well.

Inspection Date: March 24, 2011 Job ID: US597518

Page 13

Report Revision: Final © 2009 Microline Technology Corporation

Pnetrgy flliidstreem1 US Saft


5.2.3. Severity list and Feature location Sheets

The Depth-Based Severity Report (Attachment 5.2.3) lists the 5 most severe metai loss features detected during the survey, acc-0rding to their depth of penetration.

In order to help facilitate the location and recovery of these features in the field, the DepthBased Severity Report includes a Feature location Sheet for each feature listed.

The Feature location Sheets includes a description of each feature, and a schematic diagram that indicates a) the feature with respect to casing joint number and depth in the well b) the feature location within the specified casing joint, and c} the joint location with respect to adjacent joints.

5.3. Pressure-Based Anaiysis

Pressure-sentenced ratios are 11011-dimensionai terms which help operators assess the severity of metal loss features detected during the survey.

This report determines U1e Estimated Repair Factor (ERF) 011 the basis of operating pressures and metal loss feature assessment methods selected by the operator, and identified in Section 1.2 of this report. The ERF is calculated as follows;

Where;

ERF = P/Psaie

P = MAOP, MOP, or other Operator seiected pressure vaiue, and

P safe= the safe operating pressure as ca!cu!ated by the metai ioss features assessment method selected by the Operator {e.g. B31G, Modified B31G, Effective Area)

The ERF Summary is presented in Tabie 12, below.

Table 12: ERF Summary

------

Ocmum11u::esi ERIF Vali!les Number of Joints

0 Meta! loss features with ERF < 0.6 49

0 Metal loss features with 0.6 :::; ERF < 0.8

Meta! loss features with 0.8 :::; ERF < 0.90

0 Metal loss features with 0.9 :::; ERF < 1.0

0 Meta~ loss features with ERF <:: 1.0 0

@ Tot.al 49

5.3.1. Pressure-Sentenced Plot

The pressure-senternced plot graphically displays ail meta~ loss featl.JH"es within each major segment on the basis of feature length (x-axis) and depth (y-axis). The reference line


Page 14


Inergy Midsttv!H'J,m US Salt us

-~'''"~-~~''"'''~'·~~''''


plot corresponds to an ERF equal to 'l .O. Meta! loss features with a ca!cu!ated ERF greater than 1.0 plot above the reference line.

This report contains one pressure-sentenced plot for each major pipeline segment defined by the operator. The value for pipeline e>d:emal diameter, 0, is assumed to be constant throughout each major segment

Pressure-Sentenced Plots are presented in Attachment 5.3.1.

5.3.2. Pressure-Based Histograms

The distribution of meta! loss features within the well, according to their effect cm remaining strength, is illustrated in a series of Pressure-Based Histograms (Attachment 5.3.2). Four histograms are presented:

., All metal loss features 0 Meta! loss features with ERF < 0.8 " Metal loss features with 0.8 ::;; ERF < 1.0 " Metal loss features with ERF 2 1.0

The vertical axis of each histogram corresponds to the HR VertHog fog depth, and the horizontal axis corresponds to the number of occurrences. Each horizontal bar in the histogram represents the total number of occurrences within a 40 .00 foot interval of the weH.

5.3.3. Severity Ust and Feature Location Sheets

The Pressure-Based Severity Report (Attachment 5.3.3) lists the 5 most severe metal !ass features detected during the survey according ta their Estimated Repair Factor (ERF}.

in order to help facifitate the location and recoveiy of these features in the field, the PressureBased Severity Report includes a Feature location Sheet for each feature fisted.

The Feature Location Sheets includes a description of each feature, and a schematic diagram that indicates: a) the feature with respect to casing joint nrnnber and depth in the well; b) the feature iocation within the specified casing joint, and; c) the joint location with respect to adjacent joints.

5.4. Feature Type

Feature type is a classification system that serves to group metal loss features within one of seven geometric categories. Feature Type classifies features according to their estimated length and width as a function of casing body wall thickness ("t"}, as illustrated in the graphic, below.


Page 15


lnetrgy Mffdstr~am US Salt

HR VERT/LOG fNSPECTIO/IJ FINAL REPORT

g ~

~ ~ ~ .:: I

~Jleta! loss Feature Type 10

Ol

·~ 0

2. <!)

m C'> -~ c E ~ 6 0

V5 =>

~ ~

c Q ~

~ General 4 :::>

·e ~

Pitiing ~ Alda! Grooving

__.-"

Pinhole Axial Slotting o+o~~,,__~~~~~~~.~~~s~~~.~~~~~~~~~---<10

Metal Loss Length (/'.)

· lf{wall thickness)< DA- in then A= 0.4, else A=Vtall thickness

Meta/ Loss Feature Type graphic adapted from the Pipeline Operators Forum [POFJ Metal Loss Definitions

The Feature T}'pe Summary (Table 13 bekwlf) serves to summarize al! metal loss featmes identified during the survey aiccmding to type.

Table 13: Feature Type Summary

Pinholes

Pits

Genera~

Total

0

0

0

0

0

Cl

0

@

0

Q

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

The distribution of meta! loss by feature type is graphically illustrated in the Feature Type P!ot (Attachment 5.4).

5.5. Joint Summary

The Joint Summary represents a comprehensive list of the individual joints of casing in the welL By cm1vention, joint m .. m1bering sta1ts from the swiace, Off top logged interval, and increments with increasing wel~ depth.


Page 16


Inergy Midstream US Saft


The Joint Summary uniquely identifies each joint by joint number, starUend depth, length, casing weight and grade. The mid-point, or centerline, of the uphole and downhole collars serves to identify the start and end point of a casing joint

The Joint Summary additionally describes the condition of each joint in terms of the maximum metal loss feature DOP, and minimum RPR The individual feature number associated with the maximum DOP and minimum RPR is indicated.

A Joint Classification is assigned to each joint per the we!! operators' convention based on maximum DOP per joint.

The Joint Classification (Table 14, below) serves to summarize the casing joints by maximum metal loss feature DOP.

Table 14: Joint Cfassification

The Joint Summary Report (on the accompanying CD} contains a comprehensive listing of the casing joints identified during the survey.


Page 17


fm:Jrgy Midstreaim US Saft

6. System Qualification and Qua!it}' Control

6. i. System Qualification


The HR Vertiiog systen-1 used to acquire and analyze the magnetic fiux leakage casing inspection data and generate this report is a part of Baker Hughes/Baker Atlas Pipe Evaluation Services. Baker Al:las is a recognized industry leader in the field of downho!e casing inspection technology, and provides MFL casing inspection services utilizing the Veiii!og, Digital Verti!og, MicmVertilog and HR Vertilog series tools on a global basis.

The personnel and equipment used to pe~iorm this HR Veriilog inspection survey and analyze the results have been qualified according to the Baker Atlas HR Vertilog fnspectkm Systems Qualifications (SQ 501).

The complete HR Vertilog pe1iormance specifications are contained in the HR Vertifog Performance Specification (document PS 501 ).

6.2. Best Efforts

Ail opinions, interpretations, and analysis provided in this report or in connection with this survey are provided to the well operators on a "best efforts" basis. it remains as the sole responsibility of the well operator to use the information contained in this report to draw their own conciusions regarding tile condition of the casing, and to urn:lertake appropriate actions to ensure the wells ongoing safety, casing integrity and fitness for purpose.

in the course of analyzing the survey data and producing this report, Baker Atlas Data Analysts !1ave provided the well operator with interpretations based on !:heir experience and judgment, but always within the limits of the inspection technologies employed, and the downhole operating conditions encountered. Since all MFL interpretations and analyses are opinions based on inferences from electrical, magnetic, and other indirect measurements, the accuracy or completeness of any interpretation is not, and can not be, guaranteed.

6.3. Analysis Quality Control

The data in this report was processed in accordance with wt·men work instruction fnSight t-iR Veri:ilog Anafysis (document W~ 501), the µu1pose of which is to er.sure the ongoing consistency, integrity, and qm:niity control over the HR Vertilog analysis process.

6.4. Continuous Process Improvement

The inSight™ HR Verrnog analysis software incorporates various technologies to identify and size meta! loss features, including a system of supervised learning that relies on known input from largescale calibration defect sets, magnetic FEA, and recovered casing defects.

ConsequenUy, inSight™ has the capacity to integrate inspection data with recovered metal loss feature dimensions obtained from reliable sources. Such data may include properly identified and procured feature rubbings, dimensioned sketches, scaled photos, laser scans, x-ray, or casing samples.

Inspection Date: fillarch 24, 2011 Job ID: US597518 Report Revision: Final

Page 18


Inergy Midsi:m<:mt& US Saft

HR VERT/LOG fNSPECTION FINAL REPORT

We invite you to participate in our Continuous Process improvement program by contacting one of the Baker Atlas representatives listed below. Data from your recovered casing will be usecl to help expand the understanding of MFL- defect interactions, improve analysis processes, and optimize feature-sizing capabilities.

Don Vogtsberger Pipe Evaluation Manager Baker Atlas 2397 Traversefield Drive Traverse City, Michigan 49686 (231) 935-1585 ext 116 Don. Vogtsberger@bakerat!as.com

Bruce Girrell VP Information Technology Micmiine Technology Corporation 2397 Traversefield Drive Traverse City, Michigan 49686 (231) 935-1585 ext 103 [email protected]


Page 19


List of Attachments

Attachment

1. Job Information ........................................... See Reporl Section 1

2. Casing Configuration Casing Segment Reporl External Casing Report

3. Feature List Feature List

4. Casing Components ........................................... See Feature Ust

5. Metal Loss Features Surface-Based Histograms ............................................ 5. 1 Maximum Depth Histograms .......................................... 5.2.1 Depth Range Histograms ............................................... 5.2.2 Depth-Based Severity Repori ........................................ 5.2.3 Pressure-Sentenced Plots ............................................. 5.3.1 Pressure-Based Histograms .......................................... 5.3.2 Pressure-Based Severity Report ................................... 5.3.3 Feature Type Plot .......................................................... 5.4 Joint Summary Report .................................................... 5.5

6. Depth Based Report Depth Based Report

7. Pressure Based Severity Report Pressure Based Severity Report

Casing Segment Report

Identifier Start Log Position feet'

.:3-;-13

Stop Log Position feet

2 59.2

Inergy Midstream US Sal!

US Salt#58

Diameter Wall Thickness inches inches 9.62 0.352

Inspection Date: 03-24-2011 Report Date: 03-27-2011

Weight Type Grade SMYS MOP Design Factor lb/ft ksi si 36 Seamless API J55 55 1000

1 of 1

External Casings

Start Log Position (feet) -3.13

Inergy Midstream US Salt

US Salt #58 Stop log Position

{feet) Diameter (inches)

163.75

Inspection Date: 03-24-2011 Report Date: 03-27-2011

Wall Thickness (inches)

Weight (lb/ft)

1 of 1

Feature List~ Mumple Burnt Pressures

Log Depth DistUHC Joint Length Identifier feet feet feet -3.13 0 28. 7 C·1 -3.13 0 25.44 26.57 41.75 C-2 67.06 41.64 67.19 41.75 42.55 0-3 109.75 42.55 44.15 C-4 153.9 44.15 45.35 C-5 163.75 9.66 163.75 9,66 19925 45.35 46.62 C-6 246.06 46.82 47.02 C·7 293.0B 47.02 45.61 C-8 338.69 45.61 44.9 C-9 363.59 44.9 42.3 c-10 425.!19 42.3 40.46 C..11 466.35 40,46 46.72 C·12 513.07 46.72 45.45 C•13 556.52 45.45 45.04 C-14 603.56 45.04 41,89 C..15 645.45 41.69 472 c-16 692.65 47.2 46.B c-17 739.45 46.B 432 C•1B 782.65 432 43.2 C..19 625.85 43.2 47.02 C-20 672.87 47.02 42.85 C-21 915.72 42.85 45.77 C-22 915.7G 0.05 962.49 46.77 45.84 C-23

1006.32 45.64 46.02 C..24 1053.35 45.02 44.25 C-25 1097.6 4425 43.!12 C~6 1141.42 43.82 43.75 C-27 1165.17 43.76 44.39 C-28 1229.56 44.39 43.17 C-29 1272.73 43.17 4526 C-30 1317.99 4526 45.6 C-31 1318.03 0.04 1363.59 45.6 44.7 C..32 1406.29 44.7 43.88 C-33 1452.17 43.98 45.27 c-l4 1497.44 45.27 44.66 C-35 1542.12 44.66 46.79 C-36 1566.92 46.79 44.14 C-37 1633.05 44.14 47.13 C-38 1660.16 47.13 41.55 C-39 1721.73 41.55 4327 c-40 1721.67 0.14

1765 43.27 44.42 C-41 1609.42 44.42 43.02 c-42 1652.43 4l.02 48.62 C-43 1699.05 46.62 46.71 c-44 1945.76 46.71 46.76 C-45 1992.52 46.76 43.15 C..46 2035.67 43.15 47.27 C-47 2082.95 47.27 43.45 C-48 2083.03 0.08 2125.71 42.77 2126.4 43.45 32.61 C-49 2159.2 32.81 c-so

Clas& Description

ppurtonance anga Begin External Casing

collar Hardware Centralizer

Coll or Collar Coll at

H<1rdware Bottorn Of E:mernol Casing End EJ{lemal Casing

Collar Callar Collar Collar collar Collar Ctilhir COll<'lr Collar Collar Collar Collar Collar Collar Collar Collar Collar

Hardware Centrall2Br CO!li!r Collar Collar Collar Collar Coller Colll!lr Callar Collar

H!irdware Centralizer Collar Collar Coll or Collar Collar Coll or Collar Collar Collar

Hardware Centralizer Collar Collar Collar collor Collar Collar Collnr Colfor

Hanlwnra Cantrall2ar HatdWnrc Conttl!llZet

Collot lnt:orprcti;itlon Btlundory

Inergy Mlds1ream US Salt

US Solt#58

Surface Indication Length i che.s

lnspectton Do1o: 03-24-2011 Report Dato: 03-27-2011

Width P Safe B31G RPR inches B31G

ERF Effective Arna P Sate NWT Comment 831G sl inchos

0.352

0.352

0.352 0.352 O.J5:l

0,352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 D.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.3ti2 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352

0.352 1).352 o.352 0,352 o.352 11.352 0.352 0.352 11.352

0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352

0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352 0.352

0.352

1 af1

Attachment 5.1 - Surface Based Histograms Company: inergy Midstream

Field: US Salt Well: US Salt #58

Inspection Date: 03-24-2011 Repo1t Date: 03-27-2011

o· 50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

g 1000

a 1050 a.> 0 1100 OJ

.3 1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150

All External

0 2 3 4 5 0 2 3 4 5 Occurrences Occurrences

Baker Atlas

Internal

0 2 3 4 5 Occurrences

Company:

Fieict

\Ne!!:

Inspection Date:

Repo1t Date:

Altachroent 5.3.2 - Pressure Based Histograms Inergy Midstream US Salt

US Sa!t#58 03-24-201 'i 03-27-2011

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

7501 800

8501 0 ool .~ I 950'

g 100Qll 5 i050

~ 1100!

_'} 1150j

12001

1250

1300

1350

14001 1450

1500

1550]

16001

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150 0

Al!ERF

2 3 4 5 0 Occurrenoas

(ERF < 0.80)

2 3 4 5 Occunenoes

(0.80 <= ERF < 1.00)


(ERF >= 1.00)

LJ 0 2 3 4 5

Occurrences

Company:

Field: Well:

Inspection Date: Repo1t Date:

G.8

0.6

0.4-

!nergy [\/110.sti·earn US Sa!t

US Salt #58

03-24-20'1 'I

03-27-20'1 'I

/1,ttachment 5.4 - FeatCJire Type P~ol:

All Features

il2l 0.01--~__.;~~--'~~~~~-"-~~~~~~~~~~~...;-~~~~~~~~~~--<

0.0 0.5 1.0 i .5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Metal Loss Length (A)

· lf (WEiii thiclmess) < 0.4 in then A= 0.4. else A= \i\•a!I thickness

1-m.VRLJRepcwt, Jnt Insight Joint Interpretation summary

Joirrnt From To Lengd1 cfass Ma;( Depth Posit·ion Type ID/OD ----- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ~---------~ -----------

1 -3,13 25,44 2~L 57 class 1 2 25.44 67.19 41.75 cl ass 1 3 67.19 109,75 42.55 c"l ass 1 4 109.75 153.90 44,15 class l 5 153.90 199,25 45,35 class 1 6 199,25 246,06 46,82 Class 1 7 246.06 293.08 47 ,02 Class l " ~ 29:Lo8 :B8,69 45,61 Ch\S~~ l 9 338.69 383.59 44,90 Class 1

lO 383,59 425,89 42' 30 class 1 11 425.89 466,35 40,46 class l 12 466.35 513,07 46, 72 class Jl J.3 513.07 558 .. 52 45,45 class 1 14 558,52 603,56 45,04 Cfass 1 lS 1603' 56 645,45 41.89 class 1 16 645.45 692.65 47,20 class 1 17 692.65 739.45 46,80 ('lass l lB 739,45 782.65 43,20 chi.ss 1 19 782,65 825,85 43,20 (h11.SS J. 20 825,85 872,87 47 ,1()2 class 1 21 872" 87 915' 72 42 .. 85 Cl a.SS l 22 915" 72 962 .49 46.77 class l 23 962.49 1008,32 45,84 class 1 24 J!.008.32 1053.35 45,02 Class 1 25 J!.053.35 10917 .. 60 44,25 class l 26 1097.60 1141.42 43.82 cl ass l 27 1141.42 1185.17 4:.L 75 Cfass 1 28 1185,17 1229' 56 44.39 cfass 1 2 9J 12291.56 1272 "73 43,17 class 1 30 1272. 73 1317" 919 45.26 class 1 31 Jl.317 .. 919 1363' 591 45,60 cl ass JL 32 :il.363, 59 1408" 29 44.70 class 1 33 1408.29 1452.17 43,88 class 1 34 1452,17 1497,44 45,27 class 1 35 1497.44 1542~12 44nlfi8 class 1 36 l542"12 1588.92 46.791 class l 37 1588' 92 163:L05 44,Jl.4 class l 38 1633,0S 1680,18 47.B class l 39 :il.680. 18 172L 73 41. 55 cl ass Jl 40 1721. 73 1765,00 43,27 class 1 41 1765.00 1809.42 44,42 class 1 42 rno9.42 1852 .43 43.02 class 1 43 1852.43 1899.05 416.62 class l 44 1899.05 1945,715 46,71 class l

Page l

HRVRT_Report.Jnt 45 1945. 76 1992.52 46.76 class 1 46 1992.52 2035.67 43.15 class 1 47 2035.67 2082.95 47.27 cl ass 1 48 2082.95 2126.40 43.45 class 1 49 2126.40 2159.20 32.81 cl ass 1

Joint summary File End

Page 2

Company: Field: Well:

Inspection Date: Repo1t Date:

Attachment 5.1 - Surface Based Histograms Inergy Midstream

US Salt US Salt #58

03-24-2011 03-27-2011

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

g 1000

R 1050 (I)

0 1100 OJ

_g 1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150

All

1.------. ----- --

0 2 3 4 Occurrences

5 0

External

2 3 4 5 Occurrences

Internal


Attachment 5.2.1 - Maximum Depth Histograms Company: Inergy Midstream

Field: US Salt Baker Atlas Well: US Salt#58

Inspection Date: 03-24-2011

Report Date: 03-27-2011 All External Internal

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

g 1000

~ 1050

"' 0 1100 0)

.3 1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80

Maximum Depth (%) Maximum Depth{%) Maximum Depth(%)


Inspection Date:

Report Date:

i11ergy Midstream

US Salt US Salt #58 03-24-2011

03-27-2011

Attachment 5.2.2 - Depth Range

(0 < d <= 100%) ( 20% <= d < 50%) ( 50% <= d < 80%)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

g 1000

a 1050 QJ

0 1100

.§' 1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150 0 2 3 4 5

Occurrences

0 2 3 4 5 0 2 3 4 5 Occurrences Occurrences

(d >= 80%)



Inspection Date: Report Date:

Attachment 5.3.2 - Pressure Based Histograms Inergy Midstream US Salt US Salt#58 03-24-2011 03-27-2011

Baker Atlas

All ERF (ERF < 0.80) (0.80 <= ERF < 1.00) (ERF >= 1.00)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

g 1000

~ 1050 <lJ 0 1100 O>

.3 1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150 0 2 3 4 5 0

Occurrences 2 3 4 5

Occurrences 0 2 3 4 5

Occurrences

012345 Occurrences

Con1pany:

Field: \!Veil:

Inergy Midst1·ea111 US Sati

US Sa,lt#58 Inspection Date: 03-24--20·1 ·1

Report Date: 03-27-201 'I

6.0,--5.8! 5.6

5.41 5.2] 5.0

4.8

4.6

4 .. 4 .

.<!-.2

4.0

3.81 3.61

<( 3 6'. - ..

I ~·2 1 f3 -..:i.O 0

~ 2.8

~ 2.6

~-:j· ---2.0-

·i.s

'i.6

'i.4

'i.2

·1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

D.O 0.0 0.5

i

I I I

j

I I

i.0 1.5

All Features

I

I I I I

I

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Metal Loss Length (A)

·If (wall thiclmess) < 0.4 in then A= 0.4, else A= wall thickness

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Insight Joint Interpretation summary HRVRT_Report.Jnt

Joint From To Length class Mal{ Depth Position Type ID/OD ----- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -~--------- -----------

1 -3.13 25.44 28. 57 Class 1 2 25.44 67,19 41. 75 class 1 3 67.19 109.75 42.55 class 1 4 109.75 153,90 44.15 chss 1 !': ) 153,90 199.25 45,35 Class 1 6 199,25 246.06 46,fl2 c·i ass 1 7 246.06 293.08 47,02 Class l 8 293.08 .B8,69 45.61 Class 1 9 338.69 383,59 44.90 Class 1

10 383.59 425.89 42.30 cl ass 1 11 425.89 466,35 40.46 class l 12 466.35 513 '07 46. 72 class l 13 513 '07 558.52 45.45 class l 14 558.52 603.56 45.04 Class l 15 603,56 645.45 41.89 Class 1 16 645,45 692,65 47.20 class l 17 692,65 739.45 46.80 class l 18 739.45 782.65 43.21) class l 19 782.65 825.85 43.W Class 1 20 825.85 872 '87 47 .02 class l 21 872 '87 915 'n.. 42.85 class 1 22. 915' 72 962 .49 46. 77 class 1 23 %2,49 1008,32 45.84 clJ.ss 1 24 1008.32 1053,35 45.02 c·1 ass l 25 1053,35 1097.60 44.25 class 1 26 1097,60 1141.42 43.82 class l 27 1141,42 1185.17 43.75 class l 28 1185.17 1229' 56 44.39 class 1 29 1229.56 1272. 73 43.17 class 1 30 1272' 73 1317 .99 45.26 class 1 :n 1317' 99 BIB.59 45.60 class 1 32 1363' 59 1408.29 44.70 class l 33 1408.29 1452.17 43.88 class 1 34 ].452'17 1497,44 45.27 1C'1 ass l r-bl"' .:u 1497.44 1542.12 44,68 cla.ss ll. 36 1542"12 1588.92 46' /1 9 class l 37 1588.92 1633.0S 44.14 class l 38 :Ui33.0S 1680,Ul 47 .13 class 1 39 Hi80.18 1721. 73 41. 55 class 1 40 1721. 73 1765,00 43,27 cl ass JL 41 1765 ,00 1809.42 44.42 cl ass l 42 1809.42 1852.43 4:J. 02 Class 1 43 1852.43 1899.05 46.62 class 1 44 1899.05 1945.76 46. 71 class 1

Pa_ge 1

HRVRT_Report.Jnt 45 1945.76 1992.52 46.76 class 1 46 1992.52 2035.67 43.15 class 1 47 2035.67 2082.95 47.27 class 1 48 2082.95 2126.40 43.45 class 1 49 2126.40 2159.20 32.81 class 1

Joint summary File End

Page 2

•

G

•

B Datum

Hamilton Shale

Marcellus Shale

Onondaga Limestone

Schoharie Shale

Manlius Limestone and Dolomite

Rondout Limestone and Dolomite

Bertie Shale and Dolomite

_._,..... __ Top of Camillus Shale

~-~--Top of Salt

Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC Structural Cross-Section B-B'

fl ~~:~~~~~~~~!tit . G."!,M(V>A.C:::AV-NEVTRON LOG '

r !

.B' --

COMPANY AKZO SALT, !NO.

weu. INTERNATIONAi. UJ.T #SS

~¥~ -

--··· ··••·•••••·'••·•••-·•••·••·•~'"''- -

wf ¢

A Datum

t "i -·;

i '

~I - -'-'FF I

FIE~D WAn'.lijS oGLEN

S!iHUyLgB SfAlE NE YO K

WC..IIOff

<;t #r X. 5~c C.Yt..l!A :~I\ X•'I' CALlP~R

t ... , .... ;r,.. _.§.u....!1.._ .:ii fiSj 11 ---fl--·t>o- ,,. ___ _

~.

,_

' ..,. _ • --i- --:-

-·-- <IL §ft~ 12 ,

. ..

.-------·- --

'" .. \ I

• CMING-l'fcct!J (~

·~ wt.-1.6, ·~ ..a..sta. ..:-3i-~

Finger Lakes LPG Storage, LLC Structural Cross-Section A-A'

Hamilton Shale

Marcellus Shale

Onondaga Limestone

Schoharie Shale

-------~~~-~-

Manlius Limestone and Dolomite

Rondout Limestone and Dolomite

Bertie Shale and Dolomite

1l,\..;t. COMl'ANY· ~-,--''"'"TE••••••oT•l•!!N••••w••··· :L_c..,_~ ___ _:_"1 WELL-,_-,_~"'>.,11&c__ ______ --,"~"----_:_-1

flEUl __ ~"""'"'o'"'">'~'''''""-~~-~------1 COUNTY SCHtJ'f'LEft

""'""""'°""""' 1.-09_,...,_ l)o-~Jl..,.J.lo<>.>ml'!""'

"'" .. S 0 ST R HELD

HO~!iRECOR ·-

-X•'!' CALIPER:

- S39§ ~! .......2_n.-..l'mo.O.""" CF

"

TU!l!NGREe(l I> - ·-

' '

.· ~··· W McCULLOUGH M.. JM. TOOl COA~A1iT' m:

aAl>IATlOK LOG

...... 1 .. o.r-2.112' 1WIB Q:L F-r-

-f""1~~ bfi.lfllileib .. e!' O~ol" --· -~

- .. -- ••• .....

== == ::::::= ___ _. __ O$I !JOJS) !IOU l1(0l!I ... ....,

QI h ?l,SI

~ 21.,, .. 17&0 2..7IL.

··-· ._,.,..

-·~··- ·~ !o "M• '·-----·· ·-· .. - .~

·--· .... _ ··--. -....... -·

I

l

I I

I I

A'

H

Withheld / CCI and ECL 23-0313(1)(b)

Larry Sevenker 504-468-1909 p.1

LARRY SEVENKER

Consulting Engineer

4148 LOIRE DR. KENNER, L4. 70085

MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST PRESSURE TEST

July 17, 1985

Company: Interna.tional Salt Cornpar1Y Address• Salt Plant Road

Watkins Glen, NY 14891

Contact : Mr • Jim Loo'5.e Phone: (607) 535-2721

Test Date: 7-17-85

Test Location: 44 Type Test: Gallery System Test Number of Wells: 4 Wells Gallery Wells Tested: 33, 34, 43 & 44 Fluid in Test Well: Water

F're-s'S-ur-e Ri'cordirigs

Time Dead ~Jt Pressure Pressure

5:25 PM 5:30 5:45 6:00 6: 15 6:30 PM

Change

Tester-psi

265 265 265 265 265

0 psi

Gauge Recc•r-der psi psi

270 258 270 258 270 258 270 258 270 258

0 psi 0 psi

Rema.rt< s

Corr nee t Gauge:, Start Test

Comp 1 e te Test

Test Results: 0 psi change in a 1.00 hour- pressure test Gallery wells held pressure within testing criteria of 5"/. change in a 1.00 hour test.

Test Conducted by:

Larry S"venKer Consulting Engineer

Datet 7-17-85

Documents

BOND SCHOENECK &KING · 2011-04-19 · submersible pump (no water injection, simply pumping brine out of the cavern), and well 52 was the withdrawal well. With water injection mostly