Upload
buitruc
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
tmm
BTBT--COTTON: SAFETY ASSESSMENT COTTON: SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENTAND RISK MANAGEMENT
T. M. MANJUNATHT. M. [email protected]
At UAS, Bangalore09 January 07
WORKSHOP ON GM CROPS
WITH A FOCUS ON POST-RELEASE MONITORINGOrganised by:
Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of IndiaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore and
Biotech Consortium India Limited, New Delhi
tmm
WHAT IS WHAT IS BTBT--COTTON?COTTON?
Bt-cotton contains Lepidopteran specific gene(s)
derived from the soil bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis
introduced into it by genetic engineering
tmm
Transgenic Technology: What is Unique?Transgenic Technology: What is Unique?
A transgenic plantA transgenic plantcarries newcarries new
gene(s)gene(s)
New gene(s) can beNew gene(s) can beIntroduced into a plant fromIntroduced into a plant from
any sourceany source--bacteria, virus, fungi, animalsbacteria, virus, fungi, animals --thus overcoming taxonomic orthus overcoming taxonomic or
reproductive barrierreproductive barrier
A Big Breakthrough!A Big Breakthrough!
ManMan--made! Unnatural.made! Unnatural.Hence its safety is Hence its safety is
doubted?doubted?
tmm
1996: A Turning Point1996: A Turning PointThree Three BtBt--crops approved in USAcrops approved in USA
• BtBt--corn against European Corn Borercorn against European Corn Borer
•• BtBt--potato against Colorado Potato Beetlepotato against Colorado Potato Beetle
•• BtBt--cotton against Cotton Bollworms cotton against Cotton Bollworms
tmm
BtBt--Corn Against European Corn BorerCorn Against European Corn Borer
BtBt--Potato Against Colorado Potato BeetlePotato Against Colorado Potato Beetle
tmm
BtBt--Cotton Against Bollworm ComplexCotton Against Bollworm Complex
Pink Bollworm
Cotton Bollworm Tobacco Budworm
tmm
1983 : First transgenic plant in lab
1990 : First Bt plants
1992 : Lead lines selected. First field Tests
1993 : Seed companies cross into elite germplasm
1995 : Safety studies completed
1996 : USDA & FDA consultation completedEPA approval for commercialization
DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT OF BTBT--CROPS IN USACROPS IN USA
~ 14 years of intensive research and field trials.~ 14 years of intensive research and field trials.Millions of $ investmentMillions of $ investment
tmm
DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT OF BTBT--COTTON IN INDIACOTTON IN INDIA1994: Application to DBT by MAHYCO for import of 1994: Application to DBT by MAHYCO for import of
BtBt--cotton seeds from Monsanto,USAcotton seeds from Monsanto,USA
1995: Permit to import seeds (100 gm Coker 312)1995: Permit to import seeds (100 gm Coker 312)
1996: Seeds imported. Greenhouse studies. Back-crossing
1997-98: Limited field trials. Feeding and allerginicity studies
1998-99: Multi-location field trials
2000-02: ICAR trials and other multi-location trialsMore bio-safety studies
26 Mar 02: GEAC approval for commercialization
>500 agronomic field trials and bio-safety studies for 7-8 years.Faced unjustified opposition.
tmm
26 MARCH 200226 MARCH 2002
Govt. of India approved Govt. of India approved MahycoMahyco’’ss
BtBt--CottonCottonContaining Containing BollgardBollgard®® BtBt gene, gene, cry 1Accry 1Ac, licensed from Monsanto, licensed from Monsanto
targeted against cotton bollwormstargeted against cotton bollworms
India’s First Biotech Crop
tmm
WHAT IT TOOK WHAT IT TOOK TO GET APPROVAL?TO GET APPROVAL?
Comprehensive research data to demonstrate:Comprehensive research data to demonstrate:
Safety is accorded the highest priority in biotechnology
• Bio-safety • Environmental safety• Social and economic benefits
tmm
Safety Assessment
tmm
SAFETY ACCORDED HIGHEST PRIORITYSAFETY ACCORDED HIGHEST PRIORITYThroughout Discovery, Product Development and AdvancementThroughout Discovery, Product Development and Advancement
PostPost--MarketMarketMarketMarket
Discovery
Development
Advancement
Commercialization
Gene DiscoveryGene DiscoveryProduct ConceptProduct Concept
Line SelectionLine SelectionGH & Field EvaluationGH & Field Evaluation
TransformationTransformation
Field ProductionField ProductionVariety DevelopmentVariety Development
tmm
SAFETY ASSESSMENTSAFETY ASSESSMENT
Takes place at two Levels:Takes place at two Levels:
Internal Safety Audit by Product DevelopersInternal Safety Audit by Product Developers-- Internal experts Internal experts
Safety Regulations by GovernmentSafety Regulations by Government-- National safety regulationsNational safety regulations-- International safety guidelinesInternational safety guidelines
((CartagenaCartagena, FAO, WHO), FAO, WHO)
tmm
WHAT ARE SAFETY CONCERNS?WHAT ARE SAFETY CONCERNS?
v Toxicityv Allergenicityv Out-crossing / Gene flowv Effects on non-target organismsv Environmental impactv Pest resistance
All safety issues are to be addressed before regulatory approval is given for any product
tmm
ISSUE: SAFETY TO ISSUE: SAFETY TO NONNON--TARGET ORGANISMSTARGET ORGANISMS
Apprehension:Apprehension:
BtBt--protein may have toxic effect on protein may have toxic effect on humans, animals or other nonhumans, animals or other non--target target organismsorganisms
tmm
WHAT IS WHAT IS BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (BT)BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (BT)
EM view of a purified inclusion body
EM view of Bt with spores and crystals
Endospore
Crystal
•• Soil bacterium; ubiquitousSoil bacterium; ubiquitous
•• First discovered in 1901 in First discovered in 1901 in Japan Japan
•• About 80 subspecies /strains About 80 subspecies /strains
•• Different strains produce their Different strains produce their own insecticide proteinsown insecticide proteins
•• >140 >140 BtBt--insecticide insecticide crycryproteins characterizedproteins characterized
•• Each Each crycry protein selectively protein selectively affects insects belonging to a affects insects belonging to a particular order (particular order (egeg. Lepidoptera, . Lepidoptera, ColeopteraColeoptera, , DipteraDiptera etc) and at etc) and at their very early larval stagetheir very early larval stage
tmm
BTBT--GENES USED IN GENES USED IN COMMERCIALIZED TRANSGENIC CROPSCOMMERCIALIZED TRANSGENIC CROPS
CottonCotton -- Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, Cry1AbCry1Ac, Cry2Ab, Cry1Ab
Corn Corn -- Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry 3BbCry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry 3Bb
PotatoPotato -- Cry3AbCry3Ab
Selected after thorough screening to ensure that the Cry proteinshave no toxic or allergenic effects on higher animals
tmm
IngestionIngestion (While feeding plant tissues)(While feeding plant tissues)
SolubilizationSolubilization (Alkalinity)(Alkalinity)
ActivationActivation (pH >9.5)(pH >9.5)
BindingBinding (Specific receptor)(Specific receptor)
InsertionInsertion (Damage gut wall)(Damage gut wall)
Pore formationPore formation
Cell lysesCell lyses
D e a t hD e a t h
SELECTIVE ACTION OF SELECTIVE ACTION OF BT BT IN INSECTSIN INSECTS
tmm
BT BT HAS NO IMPACT IN HIGHER HAS NO IMPACT IN HIGHER ANIMALS BECAUSE OFANIMALS BECAUSE OF……....
Acidic intestineAcidic intestineVery low pH (~1.5 in humans)Very low pH (~1.5 in humans)Absence of required receptors Absence of required receptors
tmm
SAFETY TO NONSAFETY TO NON--TARGET TARGET ORGANISMSORGANISMS
Feed safety studies were conducted using high Feed safety studies were conducted using high dose of dose of BtBt--cotton seedcotton seed--meal / protein on:meal / protein on:
FishFishBirdsBirdsMammals Mammals -- goats, buffaloes, cows, rabbitsHoney beesHoney beesEarthwormsEarthwormsBiological control agentsBiological control agents(Lacewing, Ladybird beetles etc)(Lacewing, Ladybird beetles etc)
RESULTS REVEALED NO ILL EFFECTS & BT TO BE SAFE
tmm
FEEDFEED--SAFETY STUDIES CONDUCTED ATSAFETY STUDIES CONDUCTED AT
Industrial Toxicological Research Centre, Lucknow
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal
Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai
Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar
National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad
G. B. Pant Univ of Agri. and Tech., Pantnagar
tmm
ISSUE:ISSUE: SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCYSUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCY
Apprehension:Apprehension:
The introduction of the new The introduction of the new CryCry gene gene may alter the chemical composition may alter the chemical composition and characteristics of the plant, thereby and characteristics of the plant, thereby adversely effecting other organismsadversely effecting other organisms
tmm
COMPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCY:COMPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCY:PROXIMATE ANALYSESPROXIMATE ANALYSES
BollgardBollgard (Event 531) is substantially equivalent to conventional cotton(Event 531) is substantially equivalent to conventional cotton
Protein Fat Carbohydrates Ash Moisture05
1510
2025303540
g / 1
00 g
Control Bollgard 531
tmm
COMPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCY: TOXICANTSCOMPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCY: TOXICANTS
-- Forage composition of Forage composition of BollgardBollgard cotton is substantially equivalent to cotton is substantially equivalent to conventional cottonconventional cotton
-- Similar results found with Roundup Ready Cotton Event 1445 Similar results found with Roundup Ready Cotton Event 1445
Gossypol, % dry weight
Dihydrosterculicacid, % total lipids
Sterculic acid, % total lipids
Malvalic acid, % total lipids
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Control Bollgard 531
tmm
MOUSE ORAL TOXICITY STUDIES WITH CRY1ACMOUSE ORAL TOXICITY STUDIES WITH CRY1AC
Body wt., pre-testMales
Body wt., day 7males
Body wt., pre-test Females
Body wt., day 7 females
05
101520253035
Mea
n bo
dy W
eigh
t, gm
Vehicle control
500 mg/kg Cry1Ac
1000 mg/kg Cry1Ac
4300 mg/kg Cry1Ac
• No acute toxic effect on health upon ingestion of large amounts No acute toxic effect on health upon ingestion of large amounts based on bodybased on bodyweights, food consumption and gross necropsyweights, food consumption and gross necropsy
•• About 14 other oral toxicity studies were conducted on rats, rAbout 14 other oral toxicity studies were conducted on rats, rabbits, sheep etc.abbits, sheep etc.
tmm
Issue: Cry Proteins in SoilIssue: Cry Proteins in Soil
Apprehension:Apprehension:
BtBt--protein may accumulate in soil when protein may accumulate in soil when roots and otherroots and other parts of parts of BtBt--plants are plants are incorporated in soil and this may have incorporated in soil and this may have harmful effect on soil organisms.harmful effect on soil organisms.
tmm
BTBT PROTEINS IN SOIL GET DEGRADED PROTEINS IN SOIL GET DEGRADED
•• No difference between soils from BtNo difference between soils from Bt--crop and crop and nonnon--BtBt--crops.crops.
•• Readily susceptible to metabolic, microbial Readily susceptible to metabolic, microbial and and abioticabiotic degradation once they are degradation once they are ingested or excreted into soil ingested or excreted into soil
•• BtBt insecticidal proteins cannot bioinsecticidal proteins cannot bio--accumulate causing delayed effectsaccumulate causing delayed effects
tmm
Issue: Gene Flow & Issue: Gene Flow & WeedinessWeediness
Apprehensions:Apprehensions:Genes may escape from transgenic plants and Genes may escape from transgenic plants and cause cause ‘‘Genetic contaminationGenetic contamination’’ or or ‘‘Genetic Genetic pollution.pollution.’’
•• Vertical gene transferVertical gene transfer: Pollen containing : Pollen containing BtBtgenes from genes from BtBt --crop plants may be transferred to crop plants may be transferred to their relative plant species, including weeds, their relative plant species, including weeds, making them insect resistant (making them insect resistant (‘‘Super weedsSuper weeds’’))
•• Horizontal gene transferHorizontal gene transfer: Genes from : Genes from transgenic plants may be transferred to bacteria transgenic plants may be transferred to bacteria and other microorganisms or from bacteria to and other microorganisms or from bacteria to plants, thereby affecting their original plants, thereby affecting their original constitution constitution
tmm
GossypiumGossypium spp.(Cottonspp.(Cotton))
New World Cotton New World Cotton -- TetraploidTetraploidGossypiumGossypium hirsutumhirsutumGossypiumGossypium barbadensebarbadense
DesiDesi Cotton Cotton -- DiploidDiploidGossypiumGossypium arboreumarboreumGossypiumGossypium herbaceumherbaceum
No cross pollination between No cross pollination between tetraploidtetraploid and diploid species because and diploid species because of reproductive incompatibility of reproductive incompatibility
tmm
GENE FLOW IS A NEGLIGIBLE RISKGENE FLOW IS A NEGLIGIBLE RISK
• Vertical gene transfer:
Feral crops related to corn, potato and cotton cannot be Feral crops related to corn, potato and cotton cannot be pollinated by these crops due to:pollinated by these crops due to:
•• Difference in Difference in phenologyphenology (Diff. in flowering time etc.)(Diff. in flowering time etc.)•• Sexual incompatibility (Diff. in chromosome umbers)Sexual incompatibility (Diff. in chromosome umbers)•• Difference in habitatDifference in habitat
•• Horizontal gene flow:Horizontal gene flow:
•• Several subSeveral sub--species of species of Bt Bt already exist in soil. already exist in soil. Bt Bt crops are not going to add anything more to the already crops are not going to add anything more to the already existing flux of existing flux of crycry genes among soil microorganismsgenes among soil microorganisms
•• No evidence of horizontal gene transfer from plants to No evidence of horizontal gene transfer from plants to microbesmicrobes
tmm
WEED RELATIVES OF COTTON WEED RELATIVES OF COTTON ((GOSSYPIUMGOSSYPIUM))
GossypiumGossypium stocksiistocksii : Occurs in northern part : Occurs in northern part of Gujarat (India) where cotton is not of Gujarat (India) where cotton is not cultivated. Bollworms do not feed on this cultivated. Bollworms do not feed on this weed.weed.
GossypiumGossypium ttomentosumomentosum : Occurs in Hawaii : Occurs in Hawaii (USA) where this weed is considered on the (USA) where this weed is considered on the decline. However, decline. However, BtBt--cotton is not cultivated cotton is not cultivated in Hawaii.in Hawaii.
tmm
ISSUE: PEST RESISTANCEISSUE: PEST RESISTANCE
Apprehension:Apprehension:
The insect pests constantly exposed to The insect pests constantly exposed to BtBtproteins may develop resistance thereby proteins may develop resistance thereby resulting in resulting in ‘‘super pests.super pests.’’
tmm
INSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENTINSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT(IRM) STRATEGIES(IRM) STRATEGIES
Proactive IRM strategies have been Proactive IRM strategies have been initiated to prevent or delay the initiated to prevent or delay the potential development of resistance by potential development of resistance by the target pests the target pests
tmm
IRM STRATEGIES WITH IRM STRATEGIES WITH BTBT CROPSCROPS
•• Optimal doseOptimal dose
•• Refuge Refuge
•• Gene stackingGene stacking
•• Baseline susceptibility data for target pestsBaseline susceptibility data for target pests
•• Surveillance for product performanceSurveillance for product performance
•• BtBt--crop as a major component of IPMcrop as a major component of IPM
tmm
REFUGE FORINSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT
tmm
REFUGEREFUGEA refuge is a crop without Bt gene planted close to A refuge is a crop without Bt gene planted close to that with Bt genethat with Bt gene
Insect will feed and proliferate on nonInsect will feed and proliferate on non--Bt plants Bt plants and will remain susceptible to Bt protein.and will remain susceptible to Bt protein.
When these mate with the scant few that have When these mate with the scant few that have become resistant by surviving on the Bt crop, the become resistant by surviving on the Bt crop, the susceptible genes will dilute any resistant genes in susceptible genes will dilute any resistant genes in the overall gene pool.the overall gene pool.
tmm
RefugeRefuge
StructuredStructured20% with normal 20% with normal
pp measurespp measures5% with no control 5% with no control
NaturalNaturalHighly preferred Highly preferred alternative hostsalternative hosts
tmm
RefugiaRefugia -- Before SelectionBefore Selectionrefuge Bollgard™ cotton
R
R
SSSS
tmm
RefugiaRefugia -- During SelectionDuring Selectionrefuge Bollgard™ cotton
R
R
SS
tmm
Refugia Refugia -- After SelectionAfter Selectionrefuge Bollgard™ cotton
R
R
SS
SS
R + S = RS / SS (No RR = Resistant population)
tmm
Refugia Refugia -- Before SelectionBefore Selectionrefuge Bollgard™ cotton
R
R
SSSS
tmm
NATURAL REFUGIA
tmm
HelicoverpaHelicoverpa armigera armigera feeding on Red Gram (Tur)feeding on Red Gram (Tur)
tmm
HelicoverpaHelicoverpa armigera armigera feeding on Bengal Gram feeding on Bengal Gram
tmm
Helicoverpa armigera feeding on Sunflower
tmm
Fig 5b Larval ratio (Cotton v/s other hosts) at Eklashpur
1.00
12.02
0.28
17.50
0.080
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Cotton Pigeonpea Sunflower Chickpea SorghumCrops
Ratio
1.00
5.05
0.37
2.85
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Cotton Pigeonpea Sunflower SorghumCrops
Ratio
Fig 5b Larval ratio (Cotton v/s other crops) at Hosur
Relative Population of Relative Population of HelicoverpaHelicoverpa armigeraarmigeralarvae on alternate crops and cottonlarvae on alternate crops and cotton
tmm
GENE STACKING (PYRAMIDING)GENE STACKING (PYRAMIDING)
Two Two Bt Bt genes genes egeg. . Cry1AcCry1Ac & & Cry2Ab Cry2Ab in thein the same same plant with different modes of action.plant with different modes of action.
Bt Bt gene with other insecticidal gene gene with other insecticidal gene egeg. Protease . Protease inhibitor, amylase inhibitor.inhibitor, amylase inhibitor.
In case an insect develops resistance toIn case an insect develops resistance toone gene, it would succumb to the otherone gene, it would succumb to the other
tmm
NO INCIDENCE OF PEST RESISTANCENO INCIDENCE OF PEST RESISTANCE
In the last 10 years (1996In the last 10 years (1996--2006) of commercial cultivation of 2006) of commercial cultivation of BtBt--cotton and other cotton and other BtBt--crops on millions of acres, there has crops on millions of acres, there has not been any field incidence of pest resistance to not been any field incidence of pest resistance to in in plantaplantaexpressed expressed BtBt--proteinsproteins
Lab studies and incidence of resistance Lab studies and incidence of resistance by other insects to by other insects to Bt Bt sprayssprays have often beenhave often been misquoted as misquoted as resistance to resistance to BtBt--cropscrops
tmm
ISSUE: REGULATION OF GM ISSUE: REGULATION OF GM CROPSCROPS
Apprehension:Apprehension:
Regulation of genetically modified Regulation of genetically modified crops is not adequate and dependablecrops is not adequate and dependable
tmm
Ministry of Science Ministry of Science & Technology& Technology
Ministry of EnvironmentMinistry of Environment& Forests& Forests
DBTDBT
IBSCIBSC RCGMRCGM
GEACGEAC
REGULATION OF REGULATION OF GMOsGMOs IN INDIAIN INDIA
Each major committee has sub-committees, comprisingexperts in various fields drawn from various public institutions
tmm
SAFETY REGULATIONS IN USASAFETY REGULATIONS IN USA
Three federal agencies ensure safety of biotech Three federal agencies ensure safety of biotech products:products:
USDA:USDA: Field testing and environmental safetyField testing and environmental safety
EPA:EPA: Environmental, food and feed safety forEnvironmental, food and feed safety forpestpest--protected product registration and protected product registration and sales; and for herbicide use on Roundup sales; and for herbicide use on Roundup Ready crops Ready crops
FDA: FDA: Food and feed safetyFood and feed safety
Similar regulatory bodies exist in other countries also
tmm
The following facts reveal a lot
Are the Criticism/OppositionAre the Criticism/OppositionJustified?Justified?
tmm
SAFETY OF GMOS: A NEVERSAFETY OF GMOS: A NEVER--ENDING DEBATE!ENDING DEBATE!
Issues raised have been mostly speculative, complex, Issues raised have been mostly speculative, complex, inconsistent and confusing. The issues ranged from:inconsistent and confusing. The issues ranged from:
Scientific issues should receive utmost priority
EthicalEthical -- EmotionalEmotionalEconomical Economical -- EgoisticEgoisticPoliticalPolitical -- PublicityPublicityIgnoranceIgnorance -- Arrogance Arrogance Legal Legal -- IllegalIllegalSocial Social -- ScientificScientific
tmm
In 1901 : In 1901 : Bt Bt discovered in Japandiscovered in Japan
Since 1956 : Used as foliar spray to control a variety ofSince 1956 : Used as foliar spray to control a variety ofpests all over world pests all over world
Since 1996 : After due regulatory approval as safe Since 1996 : After due regulatory approval as safe and beneficial, transgenic and beneficial, transgenic BtBt--crops crops commercially grown on several millions commercially grown on several millions of hectares in several countriesof hectares in several countries
In 2001 : In 2001 : BtBt completed 100 years completed 100 years
SAFE HISTORY OF SAFE HISTORY OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (BT)BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (BT)
No negative impact for more than 100 years! No negative impact for more than 100 years!
tmm
GLOBAL AREA OF TRANSGENICGLOBAL AREA OF TRANSGENIC CROPS, CROPS, 19961996--20052005
90.081.0
67.758.7
52.644.239.9
27.8
11.01.7
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0
100.0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Hec
tare
s in
Mill
ion
More than a 50-fold increase in 10 years
tmm
GMGM--COTTON: COUNTRIES & AREA IN 2005COTTON: COUNTRIES & AREA IN 20058 Countries, 9.8 M Ha8 Countries, 9.8 M Ha
(Year of Introduction in Parentheses)(Year of Introduction in Parentheses)
USA 4.6 M Ha
(1996)
Mexico0.12 M Ha
(1998)
Colombia < 0.1 M Ha
(2002)
Argentina0.07 M Ha
(1997)
China 3.3 M Ha
(1997)
India 1.3 M Ha
(2002)
Australia 0.3 M Ha
(1996)
South Africa 0.03 M Ha
(1998)
tmm
AREA UNDER AREA UNDER BTBT--COTTON IN INDIACOTTON IN INDIA(IN 6 to 9 STATES)(IN 6 to 9 STATES)
YearYear Area inArea inHectaresHectares
Area in Area in AcresAcres
No. of No. of Bt Bt farmersfarmers
20022002 29,41529,415 72,68572,685 25,00025,000
20032003 86,24086,240 2,13,0992,13,099 75,00075,000
20042004 5,53,0005,53,000 13,66,46313,66,463 3,50,0003,50,000
20052005 12,66,690*12,66,690* 31,28,72431,28,724 10,00,00010,00,000
*This adoption is about 14% of 9.0 m ha of total cotton area in India
tmm
IMPACT OF BT COTTON IN INDIA, 2004IMPACT OF BT COTTON IN INDIA, 2004
StateState Bollworm pesticide Bollworm pesticide reductionreduction
% % RsRs/acre/acre
Yield increaseYield increase
% % QtlQtl/acre/acre
Increase in net profitIncrease in net profit
% % RsRs./acre./acre
Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh 79 2,08779 2,087 46 2.346 2.3 552 4,782 552 4,782
KarnatakaKarnataka 72 78272 782 33 1.7 33 1.7 8 4688 468
MaharashtraMaharashtra 71 692 71 692 50 1.950 1.9 212 6,270 212 6,270
GujaratGujarat 64 78364 783 259 7.3259 7.3 1,545 15,0951,545 15,095
Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh 60 1,23560 1,235 42 2.742 2.7 90 6,27090 6,270
Tamil Tamil NaduNadu 68 75868 758 27 1.727 1.7 46 3,26346 3,263
All India av.All India av. 72% 1,13772% 1,137 58% 3.058% 3.0 60% 5,95060% 5,950
Indian Market Research Bureau (IMRB), April 05
tmm
HIGHEST SAFETY STANDARDS EVER
Never before in the history of agriculture has food been subjected to such stringent safety assessment as biotech products
Healthy criticism is always helpful. Blind opposition Healthy criticism is always helpful. Blind opposition is unhealthy is unhealthy
Safety is our primary responsibility. We should Safety is our primary responsibility. We should always strive to do betteralways strive to do better
tmm
Incorrect knowledge is more dangerous
than ignorance !
tmm
Effective dissemination of Effective dissemination of correct knowledgecorrect knowledge
is a preis a pre--requisite to promoterequisite to promoteany new technologyany new technology
Biotechnology has the potential to revolutionizeagriculture and benefit the farmers and society