15
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 105 Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Dam Safety and Waterway Management Management February 21, February 21, 2007 2007

Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

  • Upload
    pooky

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal. Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Management. February 21, 2007. The Purpose of Today’s Presentation. Review and revise existing Chapter 105 regulations ~24 month process…January 2007 to December 2008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Bureau of Watershed ManagementRegulatory Proposal

Chapter 105Chapter 105Dam Safety and Waterway Dam Safety and Waterway ManagementManagement

February 21, 2007February 21, 2007

Page 2: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

The Purpose of Today’s Presentation

• Review and revise existing Chapter 105 regulations

• ~24 month process…January 2007 to December 2008

• Solicit ideas, suggestions and advice

Page 3: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Scope of Current Regulations• Anyone who plans to modify the course,

current or cross section of a waterbody (including wetlands)– Individuals– Corporations– Farmers– Government

• Annual Activity– 750 individual permits issued– 4000 general permit coverage authorized

Page 4: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

The Basics• Water obstructions and encroachments• Activities in wetlands• Government flood control projects• Submerged Lands of PA

Page 5: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Themes for Change• Focus DEP’s resources by streamlining

permitting processes– Three tiered system

• Clarify application requirements• Broaden resource replacement options

Page 6: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Dam safety

– Require proof of financial responsibility to operate an existing Hazard Potential Category 1 Dams

– Increase the time limit of a construction permit from 2 years to 5 years

– Require owners of Category 2 and 3 dams to submit one quarterly report by April 1st

– Category 1 dams will include any dam whose failure could lead to the loss of life

– Direct applicant to consider the potential for sinkholes or solution channels in karst areas

– Require EAP’s to be updated once every 5 years

Page 7: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Convert waivers to Permits-by-Rule (Tier I)

– This tier requires no notification and no review• Permit-by-Rule examples

– Aerial service lines crossings– Agricultural activity– Ford for private use – Navigational aids and fish habitat enhancement

approved by PFBC

Page 8: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Ag activities covered under permit-by-rule

• Maintenance of field drainage systems, constructed prior to October 26, 1991 and continue to be used for crop production– Crop production includes plowing, cultivating,

seeding, grazing, harvesting, crop rotation, and government set aside programs

• Fences that do not create a threat to safe navigation or flooding

Page 9: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• General Permits Requiring Registration Only (Tier

II)– This tier requires no review

• Tier II GP Examples – Ag activities conducted pursuant to a conservation plan– Maintenance of ponds to original storage capacity– Temporary Road Crossings, less than 1 yr– Footbridges, trails and pathways– Streambank stabilization and rehabilitation

Page 10: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• General Permits requiring registration, review and DEP

approval (Tier III)• Review could be delegated (e.g. BAMR and County

Conservation Districts)• Tier III GP Examples

– Removal of abandoned obstructions and encroachments – Restoration activities conducted under a DEP-approved

plan– Abandoned mine reclamation projects– Breaching an existing dam

Page 11: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Permitting requirements

– Permit application requirements are put in one place

– Redundant information requests eliminated– Sensitive local conditions (i.e. karst, legacy

sediments)

Page 12: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Existing wetland replacement criteria

would remain the same– Minimum 1:1 replacement requirement

for permitted activities– Minimum 2:1 replacement requirement

for un-permitted activities

Page 13: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Proposed alternative wetland compensation

– Replacement credits from a wetland bank– Financial contribution to a DEP-approved wetland

restoration program– Permanently protect on-site wetlands through

easements or deed restrictions– Other restoration, enhancement or preservation

measures of wetlands or “other aquatic resources” (stream buffers)

Page 14: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes• Increased review of stream enclosure and floodway

proposals• Compensatory mitigation requirements for streams

(one or more)– Fish enhancement structures– Streambank restoration and stabilization– Riparian corridor management– AMD treatment and remediation– Other habitat restoration or protection efforts approved

by DEP (dam removal)

Page 15: Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal

Proposed Changes

• Clarify language to enable County Conservation Districts to charge fees for General Permit processing