3
Bus Short-Circuit Rating Requirements When Protected by Current-Limiting Fuses NEMA Standards require that busway s have a symmetrical short-circuit withstand rating at least as great as the average available symmetric al short- circuit current. Since the short circuit ratings of busways are established on the basis of minimum three-cycle duration tests, these ratings will not apply unless the protective device used will remove the fault within three cycles or less. BUSWAYS MA Y BE USED ON CIRCUITS HAVING AV AILABLE SHORT- CIRCUIT CURRENTS GREATER THAN THE THREE CYCLE RATING OF THE BUSWA Y RA TING WHEN PROPERL Y COORDINA TED WITH CURRENT-LIMITING DEVICES. (NEMA Pub. No. BU1-1999) If a busway has been listed or labeled for a maximum short-circuit current with a specific overcurrent device, it cannot be used where greater fault currents are available without violating the listing or labeling. If a busway has been listed or labeled for a maximum short-circuit current without a specific overcur- rent device (i.e., for three cycles), current-limiting fuses can be used to reduce the available short-circuit current to within the withstand rating of the busway. Refer to Figure below for an analysis of the short circuit rating requirements for the 800A plug-in bus . Determining the Short-Circuit Ratings of Busway ©2005 Cooper Bussmann 73 Component Protection Busway The 800A plug-in bus could be sub jected to 65,000 amps at its line side; however , the KRP-C800SP amp Low-Peak ® time-delay fuse would limit this available current. When protected by KRP-C800SP amp Low-Peak time-delay fuses, the 800A bus need only be braced for 19,00 0A RMS symmetrical. Th is is derived by using the KRP-C_SP fuse Let-Through Chart (found in another section). The table in the adjacent column can also be used; it shows the minimum require d bracing to be 20,0 00A RMS symmetrical whe n protected by KRP-C 800SP fuses with 75,00 0A available sho rt-circuit current. This w ould allow a standard 22,000A RMS symmetrical (three-cy cle) rated bus to be specified, whereas, if a non-current-limiting type protective device were speci- fied, the bracing requirements would have been 65,00 0A for three cycles. CURRENT-LIMITING FUSES GENERALL Y REDUCE BUS BRACING REQUIREME NTS TO ALLOW A ST ANDARD SHORT -CIRCUIT RATED BUSWA Y TO BE SPECIFIED. When applying air frame circuit breakers with short-time-delay (STD), the engineer must specify additional short circuit bracing based on the STD time setting. For example, an 800 A air frame circuit breaker may have an intentional 18 cycle STD to selectively coordina te with downstream breake rs. It is imperative that the 800A busway also be brace d for this 18 cycles to avoid damage or destruction [110.10 and 110.3(B)]. The busway short circuit short-time rating has a mechanical limit. Exceeding this limit invites mechanica l damage due to the high magnetic forces associated with the peak current of the fault. The mechanic al limit typically applies for high faults near and below the busway short circuit rating.  Allowable duratio ns of short-circuit current, longer than the three-c ycles at 60Hz (0.05 seconds) required at the maximum short circuit rating, are obtained from a constant I 2 t “mechanical damage limit” curve. Typic ally , for currents below one-half of the short-circuit current rating, where mechanical stresses are reduced to one-quarter of those at the maximum rating, the mechanical capabilities become less important than the thermal capability. The lower limit duration at one-half the busway rating is determined by the busway thermal (I 2 t) capabilities. The following examples compare busway short circuit overcurrent protection by low voltage circuit breakers and current- limiting fuses. This study looks at the development of the busway mechanical withstand curves and the time- current curves of the breakers and fuses. In this example, the 8 00A plug-in buswa y has a 65kA short circuit rating for three cycles. Look at the two curves on the next page.  A plot of the busway mechan ical limit characteristic on log-log pap er passes through the short circuit rating at (65kA, 0.05 seconds) and is a constant I 2 t down to 32.5kA (one-half the short circuit rating of 65kA).  Assume the availa ble short-circuit current at the buswa y is equal to the 65kA rating. The overcurrent devices are assumed to have the proper interrupting rating. In order to coordinate selectively with circuit breakers that are instantaneously tripped, the power circuit breaker protecting the busway does not have an instantaneo us trip. There is a problem with the protection of this busway . The six cycle short-time- delay needed to achieve coordin ation results in a lack of protection of the 800A busway . A short circuit on this busway can res ult in damage. As noted on the curve, a 65,000A fault will intersect the mechanical damage curve before the 800A breaker trip s. This busway would have to be braced to withstand 65,000A of short-circuit current for a minimum of 12 cycles.  A plot of the same system utilizing Low-P eak Class L and Class RK1fus es is also shown. Curren t-limitation by the KRP-C800S P will offer short circuit protection for the busway , as it lets through 19,000A in less than 1  ⁄ 2 cycle. Note: The busway is protected by the fast speed of response in the high short circuit region. Protection is achieved, as is selective coordinatio n, with the downstream LPS-RK400 SP fuse. UL Standard 891 details short circuit durations for busway within switchbo ards for a minimum of three cycles, unless the main overcurren t device clears the short in less than three cycles.

BUS Ele Tech Lib Busway Protection

  • Upload
    viren72

  • View
    233

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/10/2019 BUS Ele Tech Lib Busway Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bus-ele-tech-lib-busway-protection 1/2

8/10/2019 BUS Ele Tech Lib Busway Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bus-ele-tech-lib-busway-protection 2/2