Upload
alvin-harvey
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
By: Bader Ba-Hammam
Problem StatementProblem Statement
There is high sulfur in Propane (C3) & Butane (C4) products coming from JGP to the customers in Jubail such as Ibn Sina & Sadaf.
Generally, JGP practice to maintain sulfur below 20ppm or well below the 30ppm specification, to allow for possible process upset or errors in reading or measurements that could produce off-spec products
JGP management takes the responsibility and the commitment to reduce sulfur to be on specification and gain customer satisfaction.
A team was assembled to review the problem with the objective of determining if the modification can be made to increase the reliability and operation performance of the MEROX unit.
Study MethodologyStudy Methodology
Define the problem.
Identify and evaluate possible causes.
Find solutions and identify recommendations.
Implement the changes.
Define The ProblemDefine The Problem
Identify the big problem Using the “Three Actual” rule to understand the problem before
solving it by collecting data from the right sources
• Go to actual place
• See the actual process
• Talk to the people (operation & maintenance)
Define The ProblemDefine The Problem
Describe the process JGP has 3 existing fractionation modules and a new module in
construction phase.
In each module, there is a MEROX Unit that reduce the Sulfur
concentration on the products.
Fractionation Unit Overview
MEROX Introduction
Measure the process performance
Fractionation Unit OverviewFractionation Unit Overview
MEROX: Mercaptan Oxidation.
MEROX unit reduces LPG sulfur content to meet customers product specifications.
MEROX IntroductionMEROX Introduction
What does MEROX process consist of?
MEROX IntroductionMEROX Introduction
Mercaptan Sulfur Extraction SectionUtilization of caustic solution to extract mercaptans sulfur from LPG products as they are converted to mercaptides.
Caustic Regeneration SectionUtilization of catalyst and air to regenerate caustic solution as the mercaptides are converted furthermore to insoluble disulfides.
Prewash Drum
Extractor
Regenerated Caustic
Contaminated Caustic
Treated Product
San
d F
ilter
Caustic Settler
LPG
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Blockage of Merox unit equipment due to salt formation
Mr. LPGH2S
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Extractor
San
d F
ilter
Caustic Settler
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Prewash Drum
NaOH(Caustic)
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
H2S + 2NaOH Na2S + 2H2O
Extractor
San
d F
ilter
Caustic Settler
Prewash Drum
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Off specification LPG products
RSH(Mercaptans)
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
NaOH
San
d F
ilter
Caustic Settler
Prewash Drum
Extractor
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Legend
Mercaptans
NaOH Solution
Hydrocarbon
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
RSH + NaOH NaSR + H2O
NaSR(Mercaptide)
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
RSH(Mercaptans)
San
d F
ilter
Caustic Settler
Prewash Drum
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Extractor
Prewash Drum
San
d F
ilter
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Contaminated Caustic
Treated Product
Caustic Settler
Extractor
O
X
I
D
I
Z
E
R
Process AirContaminated Air
Contaminated Caustic
Disulfide Oil
CausticHeater
Regenerated Caustic
To atmosphere
60 PSIG Steam
To Crude
Caustic RegenerationCaustic Regeneration
Disulfide Separator
VentTank
Catalyst Add. Pot
O
X
I
D
I
Z
E
R
Process
Air
CausticHeater
O
X
I
D
I
Z
E
R
Disulfide Separator
VentTank
Caustic RegenerationCaustic Regeneration
CatalystO2
NaSR+ + ½ H2O ½ RSSR + NaOH
RSSR(Disulfides)
Caustic RegenerationCaustic Regeneration
NaSR(Mercaptides)
Merox Catalyst
41
Depleted Air
O
X
I
D
I
Z
E
RCausticHeater
RegenerationRegeneration
Disulfide Separator
VentTank
Regenerated Caustic
To Crude
San
d F
ilter
Prewash Drum
Treated Product
Contaminated Caustic
SulfurSulfur Extraction Extraction
Extractor Caustic Settler
Process
AirDepleted
Air
O
X
I
D
I
Z
E
R
RegenerationRegeneration
Disulfide Separator
VentTank
Regenerated Caustic
To CrudeCausticHeater
Define The ProblemDefine The Problem
Measure the process performance• The two figures show product sulfur as determined by laboratory analysis in C3 and C4 products,
respectively, between February 2005 and February 2006.
• During this period, as can be seen from the figures, there has been total of only 2 periods where off-spec product (>30ppm) was actually produced from one of the three Modules; Mod II in February 05 and Mod I in early November 05. During these incidences, the other modules were producing on-spec product.
• Note that the off-spec readings obtained in January 05 for C4 and C3 are accounted for by problems at RT lab.
• In addition, there were 16 days in which C3 product sulfur exceeded 20ppm but were still on-spec.
• Also, there have been a total of 46 incidences where C4 product sulfur ranges between 20ppm and 30ppm. (32 periods between 20-25ppm & 14 periods between 25-30ppm)
• To have off-spec C3 while having on-spec C4 would mean that the process is not functioning properly.
Define The ProblemDefine The Problem
Measure the process performance
Define The ProblemDefine The Problem
Measure the process performance
Identify & Evaluate Possible Causes Identify & Evaluate Possible Causes
JGP formed a team consisting of 2 process engineers, 1 instrument engineer,
1 maintenance engineer, 2 area operation foremen and 1 maintenance
foreman.
Brainstorming session was conducted to list all the possible root causes that
could lead to high sulfur in the C3/C4 products.
The team was able to identify approximately 20 conditions or causes that
could either lead to off-spec product or give the perception that off-spec
product was being produced.
Cause and Effect diagram was identified as follow:
High Sulfur in C3/C4 Products
Operation/ People procedure
RT Lab Equipment
Sulfur not removed by MEROX
Valve Plugging problem
High MEROX Catalyst Strength
Low Caustic Strength
Low MEROX Cat Strength
Wrong O2 Analyzer
Low Temp Inlet
to OxidizerLow O2 Flow
Analyzer
High Quantity of Inlet Sulfur
Low HC Flow
Carryover
High HC Feed Rates
Low Caustic Flow
Level Control
Extractor Level Tx
Faulty Lab Results
C4 From RT
Re Entry Sulfur
On-line Analyzer
Interface Level Control
IdentifyIdentify & Evaluate Possible Causes& Evaluate Possible Causes
Identify & Evaluate Possible Causes Identify & Evaluate Possible Causes
After listing all the causes, the team outlined tools available for plant
personnel to detect the conditions and outlined the actions that should be
taken.
Moreover, the frequency of the event occurring and a severity index were
assigned to each cause. this severity index is meant to be an estimate of the
amount of time before the condition, if left unnoticed or if no action was
taken to eliminate the cause, may lead to off-spec product.
In addition, safeguards were identified to list all the tools in place to alert
personnel that such conditions or causes were occurring.
IdentifyIdentify & Evaluate Possible Causes& Evaluate Possible Causes
Causes How to Detect What Actions Frequency Severity Safeguards
High quantity of inlet sulfur
AnalyzersChange caustic
turndown feed (call OSPAS)
Low 5 Analyzer Alarm
Sulfur not removed by MEROX
AnalyzersIncrease reflux on
DeC4Low 4 Analyzer Alarm
High HC feed rates Flow meters Lower capacityC3 - medium
C4 - high2 Surge drum alarm
Low HC flow Flow meters recycle to reflux
drumLow 3 FCV alarm
Low caustic flow FCV, level extractor Increase flow Low 4 Level alarm
Level in Extractortransmitter, level
switchcheck LCV, add
causticMedium 1
level transmitter alarm
CarryoverLevel in the settler boot, high sulfur
reduce rate Low 1Feed Management
Program
Low Temp inlet to Oxidizer
Low ΔT, high O2increase heater
TempLow 3
Analyzer Alarm, Temp Alarm
Low MEROX Catalyst Strength
Shake Test, 3x/day Add MEROX Medium 3 ----
High MEROX Catalyst Strength
Emulsion in caustic shelter
Dump caustic Low 2 Shake test
IdentifyIdentify & Evaluate Possible Causes& Evaluate Possible Causes
Low O2 flow to Oxidizer
O2 analyzer, Air flow meter
check analyzer using 3in1 portable
analyzerMedium 4 O2 analyzer alarm
Wrong O2 analysisO2 analyzer, Air flow
meter
check analyzer using 3in1 portable
analyzerHigh 4
3in1 portable analyzer
Low caustic strength Lab resultsMake-up with HS
causticLow 3 ----
Re-Entry SulfurLevel in DS drum,
analyzer, labLow O2 rate, Low
MEROXMedium 5 ----
Level control LT-651
High level in Ext, off spec product, re-entry sulfur
Maintain LT Low 3Verify low flow alarm
to Ext
Interface Level Control LT-650
---- Maintain LT High 5 ----
DS Oil Plugging problems
---- Maintain Valve High 5 ----
C4 from RTAnalyzers, Lab 2x-
3x/week, customers
Call RT, Stop receiving from
RTLow 5 ----
Faulty Lab Results Take check samplecheck sample, check
processLow 2 ----
On-Line Analyzer ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Find Solutions & Identify RecommendationsFind Solutions & Identify Recommendations
Brainstorming session was conducted to list all the possible solutions
and proposed recommendations.
Although the unavailability of reliable analysis of the product from RT
lab is one of the primary cause of the problem, this specific issue is not
addressed because the laboratory has already taken steps to correct
matters.
As a result, the team has identified 17 recommendations to overcome
the problems currently being experienced in the MEROX unit.
Find Solutions & Identify RecommendationsFind Solutions & Identify Recommendations
The affinity diagram was conducted to sub-divide the recommendations into sections as
per following:
Section 1) Most Important; reduce the possibility of high sulfur products by providing
operation/engineering with timely and needed information about the unit.
1) On-line GC
2) Create poster to hang outside showing procedure for shake test
3) Log results of shake test in DCS
4) Create MEROX dashboard: DCS/PI schematic to show overview of important parameter for
MEROX performance as per decision tree in JIM 1504.33-1
5) Evaluate available and proven disulfide-caustic interface detection instrument
6) EJR to install water flush line to remove plugs from LCV-650
Find Solutions & Identify RecommendationsFind Solutions & Identify Recommendations
Section 2) General Items; to provide the operator with better information when sulfur
begins to rise as well as reemphasizing instruments PMs.
7) Consider increasing O2 alarm to 10%
8) Add ΔT reading & alarm in DCS for all oxidizers
9) Make On-line GC schematic in PI containing all sulfur information
10) Install seal pot on O2 analyzer
11) Replace F&PS analyzer installed to measure sulfur in RT C4 because it is not
reliable due to manufacturer's defect
12) Monthly PM for level & interface instruments
Find Solutions & Identify RecommendationsFind Solutions & Identify Recommendations
Section 3) Long-Term; for evaluation & studies.
13) Check Mod III inlet analyzer for accuracy
14) Evaluate “rate of change” alarm for level in Extractor
15) Evaluate installing flow transmitter on Disulfide oil flow
16) Evaluate enlarging DS oil line from 1 to 2
17) Consider adding balance calculation to alert operations when TR C4
combined with JGP C4 approached off-spec.
Implement The ChangesImplement The Changes
Each proposed recommendation was assigned to the right employee depending on his
specialty to ensure the fulfillment of the recommendation by eliminating the cause of high
sulfur product and following-up by evaluating and measuring the performance after the
change.
My role was to evaluate the existing interface level transmitter for all the Modules and then
search and evaluate new technologies.
It is found that the displacement type installed in JGP Mods is not suitable to detect interface
level and it is not recommended by ARAMCO consultants.
There are many interface level detectors methods used around the world for different
applications. These instruments should be studied very carefully from all aspects to have the
right one for JGP application.
NaOHMerox CatalystH2S
Mr. LPG