Upload
neila
View
31
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CABLE EFFECTS ON SNR FOR XCAL UPGRADE ON LHCb. Eduardo Picatoste Calorimeter Electronics Upgrade Meeting. OUTLINE. Cable effects on SNR Skin effect Introduction Signal attenuation Impedance after the cable Cable resistance due to skin effect Noise contribution Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CABLE EFFECTS ON SNR FOR XCAL UPGRADE ON LHCb
Eduardo PicatosteCalorimeter Electronics Upgrade Meeting
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 2
OUTLINE
• Cable effects on SNR
• Skin effect– Introduction– Signal attenuation– Impedance after the cable– Cable resistance due to skin effect– Noise contribution
• Conclusions
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 3
• Cables provide some constraints when fast shaping signals• Cable effects on SNR:
– Attenuation due to the skin effect long tail in the step response of the cable part of the signal is delayed and does not contribute
– Resistance of the cables noise source distributed along the cable
Cable effects on SNR
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 4
• Skin effect:– Tendency of AC current to distribute itself within a
conductor so that the current density near the surface of it is greater than at its core
– f↑ → R↑
• Define penetration or “skin” depth δ as the distance over which the current falls 1/e of its original value:
• Skin effect is due to the circulating eddy currents cancelling the current flow in the center of a conductor and reinforcing it in the surface
Skin effect: introduction
2
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 5
• Signal attenuation due to skin effect– Resistance per unit length RS:
– It can be shown that the internal cable impedance becomes:
– Transmission line characteristic impedance for high ω :
– Transfer function of a length of line:
Skin effect: signal attenuation
2
1 D
RS
jD
LjRZ iSS ...
C
L
Cj
LjZZ S
0
ljLC
jDZ
l
l eeexV
lxV
02
,
,
jLCjDZ
CjLjZS 02
Propagation constant
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 6
• Signal attenuation due to skin effect (continued)– Inverse Fourier transform:
– And the step response of the transmission line:
Skin effect: signal attenuation
tUetth t42
30
1
0
2
withWZ
l
00 2
terfctu 0
1 2
1
Introduction of long time constants → strong attenuation of the signal transmitted
through the cable
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 7
• Study two options for the detector impedance with different length cables and frequencies:– Detector capacitance: Zd=1/jCw
– Clipping line at the PMT output: Zd=Rd
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 8
• Impedance seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
xtghCj
R
xtghRCj
RxZ
d
d
1
1
,
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
00
,
1,
,
1,
,
1~,
RxZ
CjxZ
RxZ
CjxZ
RxZ
l
RxZ
x
d
x
x
d
x
50 Ohm
50 Ohm
1
~
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 9
• Impedance seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
20 m
12 m1 m
5 m50 Ohm
1
~
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 10
• Phase seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
20 m
12 m1 m
5 m
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 11
• Impedance seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
100 MHz
50 MHz1 MHz
10 MHz
50 Ohm
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 12
• Phase seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
100 MHz
50 MHz1 MHz
10 MHz
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 13
• Impedance seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=Rd:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
xtghRR
xtghRRRxZ
d
d
0
00,
00
0
0
0
0
0
,
,
,
,
,
,
RxZ
RxZ
RxZ
RxZ
RxZ
RxZ
x
d
x
x
dx
d
50 Ohm
25 Ohm
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 14
• Impedance seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=Rd:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
20 m
12 m1 m
5 m
50 Ohm
25 Ohm
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 15
• Phase seen after x m of cable towards the detector when Zd=Rd:
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
20 m
12 m1 m
5 m
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 16
CONCLUSIONS:• As expected, for
– Very short cables, Z≈Zd
– Long cables, Z≈Z0
• Impedance seen after 12 m of cable towards the detector when Zd=1/jCw:
f < 1 kHz → |Z| ~ 1/√ω
1 kHz < f < 2-3 MHz → |Z| ~ 1/jωCd (as without the cable)
2-3 MHz < f < 1 GHz → |Z| oscillates between 2 and 200Ω
f > 1 GHz → |Z| ~ 50Ω
• Impedance seen after 12 m of cable towards the detector when Zd= Rd :
f < 2-3 MHz → |Z| ~ Rd (as without the cable)
2-3 MHz < f < 1 GHz → |Z| oscillates between 25 and 100Ω
f > 1 GHz → |Z| ~ 50Ω
Skin effect: impedance after the cable
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 17
• Resistance per unit length RS:
• Skin effect resistor Rs values:– Freq high enough to suppose
current only on the cable surface
– D = 0.48 mm
– μCu ≈ μ0 = 1.26*10-6 H/m
– σCu = 5.96*107 S/m
Skin effect: cable resistance
2
1 D
RS
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
1,40
1,60
1,80
1,00E+06 1,00E+07 1,00E+08
f (Hz)
Rs
(O
hm
/m)
0
5
10
15
20
25
1,00E+06 1,00E+07 1,00E+08
f (Hz)
Rs
(O
hm
)c
ab
le le
ng
th =
12
m
Rs per length unit
Rs for a 12 m cable
Cable used: coaxial KX3B
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 18
Skin effect: noise contribution
• Noise generator per unit length:
– Propagation constant (rearranged):
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
1,00E+06 1,00E+07 1,00E+08
f (Hz)
en
(V
*Hz^
-0.5
)
fKTRfê Sn 42
p
S
vj
R
R 02
Plot en (nV/√Hz):
•Temperature: 300 K
•Cable length: 12 m
•Fast shaping times approximation:
-Skin effect noise ~ single noise generator at preamp input
-Aproximate RS at preamp+shaper central frequency
RS 18 ≃ Ω
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 19
Zd preamp
Noise current
• The noise current per unit length at position x (^ means per unit length):
– From which we can obtain in2 integrating over the length of all the cable from the detector to the preamp:
– In the case of the clipping line (Zd=Rd):
22
0
22
,
1 xlnn e
RxZêxî
dxxîil
nn 0
22
leRR
eeRR
eRR
RRR
êi l
d
ll
d
l
d
d
nn
2sin12
2
1
4222
0
24
0
42
020
20
22
xtghZR
xtghRZRZ
vj
R
RD
R
KTRê
d
d
p
S
S
Sn
0
00
0
2
2
2
1
4
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 20
• Noise current generated by the cable In the case of the clipping line (Zd=Rd):
Calculated skin effect noise current
Calculations validity
f >> 18.4 kHz
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 21
• Noise current generated by the cable in the case without clipping line (Zd=1/jCdw):
Calculated skin effect noise current
Calculations validity
f >> 18.4 kHz
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 22
• Case of clipping line and current amp• On David’s talk, all amp PSD is calculated:
– Transimpedance gain ZT=500Ω
• PSD of the cable (skin effect) after the preamp:
– We can use the previous result (slide 16), or
– A lumped resistor at about 18Ω:
Skin effect: PSD calculation
nTno iZcablee
2
0
2 4
ZR
KTRi
S
Seni tRs
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 23
Skin effect simulated noise
Cadence Spectre simulation circuit with mtline:
Parameter Name Value
Cable physical length l 12 m
Normalized velocity v 0.659 c
Corner frequency: f at which skin depth = conductor’s width
fcorner 18.446 kHz
DC series resistance per unit length RDC 0.031 Ω/m
Conductor loss measurement frequency
fc 200 MHz
Conductor series resistance per unit length at fc
RS 2.411 Ω/m
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 24
Skin effect simulated noise
• Cadence Spectre simulation circuit with mtline and different lengthes (from 0.1 to 100 m):
- with clipping line (Zd = Rd)
- without clipping line (Zd = 1/jCdω)
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 25
• Comparison between Zd=1/jCdω and Zd=Rd for a cable of 12m calculation, simulation, and RS=18Ω lumped approximation:
Skin effect generated noise
Calculations validity
fcorner >> 18.4 kHz
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 26
• Comparison between Zd=1/jCdw and Zd=Rd for a cable of 12m after integration:
Skin effect generated noise
Calculations validity
fcorner >> 18.4 kHz
4/December/2009 LHCb Upgrade 27
• 2 main cable effects on SNR:– Attenuation due to the skin effect:
• long tail in the step response of the cable • part of the signal is delayed and does not contribute
– Increase of resistance of the cables• noise source distributed along the cable
• Impedance for a 12m cable at 2-3 MHz < f < 1 GHz– Zd=1/jCw: |Z| oscillates between 2 and 200 Ω– Zd= Rd : |Z| oscillates between 25 and 100 Ω
• Calculated and simulated skin effect generated noise offer more precision than the approximation with a lumped resistor at preamp input
• Noise calculations are valid for f >> fcorner = 18.4 kHz
• Calculated and simulated noise due to skin effect is low enough
Conclusions