Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    1/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    49241962134654115373212126130101124125621426190242238481Very satisfied55%53%53%45%53%39%58

    %zo55%o55%o69%zhij59%h50%42%58%c54%56%49%47%51%56%53%ho

    34130840153325487411545080781407146945483183165348Fairly satisfied38%39%34%50%38%51%zmn33%31%40%27%36%39%k48%zjk33%40%37%43%43%39%38%39%gkn

    25245-29477102781235866181129Neither satisfied nor3%3%4%-3%3%3%5%3%1%3%4%4%2%4%3%5%3%4%3%3%dissatisfied

    302562308978421114927310191231Fairly dissatisfied3%3%5%5%3%7%l4%5%2%2%1%5%j5%j4%2%3%2%5%4%3%3%jl

    1485-13-74222647-4-210313Very dissatisfied2%1%4%zs-1%-3%l3%1%1%1%3%1%3%zf-2%-1%2%1%1%as

    ---------------------No opinion/ Don't know---------------------

    8337271022879796240114366175210179264196108236116173425403829SATISFIED92%93%r87%95%92%90%91%87%95%zm96%zhi95%zhi88%90%91%94%92%93%90%90%94%zb92%imr

    443411243816111064161816211312291544DISSATISFIED5%4%9%zs5%5%7%6%l8%l3%3%2%8%zjk6%j7%zf2%4%2%6%6%3%5%afjls

    789693912675488224104356170206163246180106225113161396388784NET SATISFIED87%88%zr78%90%87%82%85%79%92%zmno92%zhi93%zhi80%83%84%93%zcg88%90%84%84%91%zb87%bimr

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 1

    Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    2/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithin

    district UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    492346135-5032399593637916231911947141303658429481Very satisfied55%55%50%-61%41%54%43%37%58%49%55%61%59%66%52%51%56%55%69%53%

    3412331151253828470472291242246623112232416212348Fairly satisfied38%37%42%100%30%50%38%52%47%35%38%39%34%41%32%41%39%35%41%28%39%

    25209-242217221614---102522-29Neither satisfied nor3%3%3%-2%6%3%*7%3%5%2%---4%4%2%2%-3%dissatisfied

    302210-422656211913--261974131Fairly dissatisfied3%3%4%-5%2%3%3%6%3%6%2%--2%2%3%6%3%3%3%

    1494-2110148851--1121--13Very dissatisfied2%1%1%

    -2%1%1%1%4%1%2%1%5%

    --1%2%1%

    --1%

    ---------------------No opinion/ Don't know---------------------

    833579250176696831298360828654317157025453510614741829SATISFIED92%92%92%100%91%91%92%95%84%92%87%95%95%100%98%93%91%92%96%97%92%

    443114-6336692927181-283184144DISSATISFIED5%5%5%-7%4%5%5%9%4%8%3%5%-2%3%5%7%3%3%5%

    78954823617067647122745792595251615682465049814239784NET SATISFIED87%87%87%100%84%87%87%91%74%88%79%91%90%100%96%91%85%85%93%94%87%

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 2

    Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    3/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    49260206644171073747510330016823227021135113042358-481481Very satisfied55%54%55%49%54%62%zn51%43%53%57%zm53%55%53%53%54%53%55%45%-58%zb53%bmn

    34136143542935029893691841181551881592519729849-348348Fairly satisfied38%33%38%42%38%29%41%zo53%zkl35%35%37%37%37%40%38%39%39%39%-42%zb39%bko

    253117227222817121418112181910--29Neither satisfied nor3%2%3%6%3%4%3%1%4%3%4%3%4%3%3%3%2%8%zd--3%addissatisfied

    301011328626113171610211023923931-31Fairly dissatisfied3%9%zr3%3%4%3%4%1%7%zkm3%5%2%4%3%4%3%3%7%zd71%za-3%adm

    1426211211328671039411213-13Very dissatisfied2%2%2%1%1%1%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%1%1%2%1%1%29%za-1%a

    ---------------------No opinion/ Don't know---------------------

    83396349118710157672168172484286387459370602226721107-829829SATISFIED92%87%93%90%92%91%92%97%zl88%92%89%93%90%94%92%92%93%zc84%-100%zb92%bcl

    44121753983741525221731133212341144-44DISSATISFIED5%11%zr5%4%5%4%5%2%8%zm5%7%4%6%3%5%5%4%8%100%za-5%ag

    7898433211367114963516315745926437042735757021468896-44829784NET SATISFIED87%76%88%s87%87%87%87%94%zkl80%87%l83%88%j84%91%zh87%87%89%zc75%-100%100%zb87%bchjl

    s

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 3

    Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    4/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulationTotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total

    (o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    4927391158145451501607512019512130875186162481Very satisfied55%47%60%52%54%59%53%55%52%50%56%52%49%67%48%58%53%

    3416948120102271131036399132912563017094348Fairly satisfied38%44%32%39%38%35%40%35%43%41%38%39%41%27%44%33%39%

    258291027142912624115929Neither satisfied nor3%5%1%3%4%2%2%5%1%4%3%3%4%1%4%3%3%dissatisfied

    3047118210104136826591331Fairly dissatisfied3%3%4%4%3%2%4%3%3%5%2%4%4%4%2%4%3%

    14235313521451024413Very dissatisfied2%1%2%2%1%1%1%2%1%1%1%2%2%2%1%1%1%

    -----------------No opinion/ Don't know-----------------

    83314213927824772264263138220326212564105357256829SATISFIED92%91%92%92%92%94%93%90%95%91%94%92%90%93%93%91%92%

    44691611313156141013367131644DISSATISFIED5%4%6%5%4%3%5%5%4%6%3%6%6%6%3%6%5%

    7891361292612377025024913220631619952799343240784NET SATISFIED87%88%86%86%88%91%88%85%91%85%91%86%85%88%89%85%87%

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 4

    Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    5/323

    Canterbury District PersonasHigh HMO densityMosaicPeople

    approachingProsperingretirementOlder singlesolder

    andor pensionersMiddle agedfamilies orLow income,Students,pensioners,on limitedand olderprofessionalsyoungeryoung singles

    ownerincomes,people, some, ownerfamiliesand couplesoccupiers ofliving inwith olderoccupiers inliving inliving inmid-rangemodest rentedfamilies,largermodest rentedrented

    accommodationaccommodationowneraccommodationaccommodationaccommodationUnwtdin urbanIn urbanoccupiers inin urbanin urbanin townTotalareasareasrural areasareasareascentresNoYesMLKJIHGFEDCBAWtd Total

    (u)(t)(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9023409811316586978119124467681161417499252412488902Unweighted Total

    90231489*124*17179*122*787115*20**4**5**70*104*18**14670*95*27**21824**97*902Weighted Total

    902312899615076917278422466677141276790212232375806Effective Base

    49218748748632514394210-328447733951131361361481Very satisfied55%60%zpq54%60%pq50%40%42%56%zn36%49%-58%41%42%40%50%56%53%50%62%zgij55%62%ij53%ijnpq

    3411073344753455292558223051465253812691032348Fairly satisfied38%34%37%35%44%u43%45%37%48%o41%46%42%43%48%c24%44%c36%40%43%32%42%33%39%cou

    25812639209-1-254512161129Neither satisfied nor3%3%2%2%3%4%7%zu3%8%zo-27%-3%5%21%3%2%2%3%3%4%1%3%odissatisfied

    3084446525711-52343315-331Fairly dissatisfied3%3%4%3%2%8%zru4%3%6%7%27%-8%c2%15%3%4%3%3%2%-3%3%

    1442-1421121--42-122-2--13Very dissatisfied2%1%3%-*5%zrsu2%1%2%4%--6%zacg2%-*2%2%-1%--1%

    -----------------------No opinion/ Don't know-----------------------

    83329482118161651067319718255895111376489252052393829SATISFIED92%94%pq91%95%pq94%q83%87%93%zn84%90%46%100%83%91%64%94%j92%93%93%94%j96%96%j92%jnq

    441264410736921-95344517-344DISSATISFIED5%4%7%3%3%13%zrsu6%5%8%10%27%-13%zacg5%15%3%6%5%3%3%-3%5%

    789282751141565599696881615499091336084241982390784NET SATISFIED87%90%zpq84%q92%pq92%pq69%81%88%zn77%79%20%100%70%86%j49%91%j86%j88%j90%91%zj96%92%j87%jnq

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 5

    Q.4. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q/r/s/t/u* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    6/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    7/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    8/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    9/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    10/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    11/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    12/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    13/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    14/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    15/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    16/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    17/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    18/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    19/323

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    20/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    21/323

    Canterbury District PersonasHigh HMO densityMosaicPeople

    approachingProsperingretirementOlder singlesolder

    andor pensionersMiddle agedfamilies orLow income,Students,pensioners,on limitedand olderprofessionalsyoungeryoung singles

    ownerincomes,people, some, ownerfamiliesand couplesoccupiers ofliving inwith olderoccupiers inliving inliving inmid-rangemodest rentedfamilies,largermodest rentedrented

    accommodationaccommodationowneraccommodationaccommodationaccommodationUnwtdin urbanIn urbanoccupiers inin urbanin urbanin townTotalareasareasrural areasareasareascentresNoYesMLKJIHGFEDCBAWtd Total

    (u)(t)(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9023409811316586978119124467681161417499252412488902Unweighted Total

    90231489*124*17179*122*787115*20**4**5**70*104*18**14670*95*27**21824**97*902Weighted Total

    902312899615076917278422466677141276790212232375806Effective Base

    2-1-1--11------11-----1No answer*-1%-*--**------*1%-----*

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 20

    Q.7. On this card is a list of things that Canterbury City Council has identified as priorities.Which two or three, if any, do you think it is most important for the Council to work towards?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q/r/s/t/u* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    22/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury

    TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    12095206109193824341728313927142812355560115Strongly support13%12%17%19%13%18%l14%l18%l9%9%13%15%13%13%12%11%9%18%ze12%14%13%l

    30127627122914478351405273591196438765373155148303Tend to support33%35%zr23%41%34%41%m29%26%36%28%33%29%40%zik30%33%30%42%eg38%33%35%34%r

    161141175154233722754335295229195317408970159Neither support nor18%18%15%16%18%22%14%17%19%23%zi16%14%18%13%17%21%g14%21%19%16%18%gnoppose

    183168264187165434874055415944295632329895194Tend to oppose20%21%22%14%22%15%20%26%23%22%25%20%20%21%25%22%25%17%21%22%21%

    1309926312245417493027432549144011117253125Strongly oppose14%13%22%zs9%14%3%21%zlo13%o13%o16%h12%21%zhj9%23%zcdef12%16%c9%6%15%12%14%chos

    751-6-41223-1312--336Don't know

    1%1%1%-1%-1%**1%1%-*1%1%1%--1%1%1%

    421371471840164115581736910290157915110464108210208418SUPPORT47%47%40%60%46%59%zlmn44%44%45%38%46%44%53%zk42%45%41%52%56%zeg44%48%46%ek

    3132675273082010851137698284849343974343171148319OPPOSE35%34%44%zs23%35%19%41%zo39%o35%o38%h37%41%zh29%43%zc37%c38%c35%23%36%35%35%cho

    108104-51192447737*20673-3872165395999NET SUPPORT12%13%zr-4%37%11%41%zlmn3%6%10%n*9%ik3%k25%zijk-1%7%eg3%g17%efg34%zdefg8%14%zb11%begiknr

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 21

    Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    23/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    1208233-1179727236356592-7237472510115Strongly support13%13%12%-13%9%13%20%23%10%17%10%13%-10%8%13%6%16%23%13%

    30120499118422416735198109195942399183406416303Tend to support33%32%36%100%22%55%33%50%35%30%33%34%51%28%32%36%31%35%42%39%34%

    16111148-91113931111144811122135799252410159Neither support nor18%18%18%-10%15%19%23%11%17%14%19%9%11%18%21%17%22%16%23%18%oppose

    18313460-26131559191666712714216013723286194Tend to oppose20%21%22%-31%18%21%6%19%25%20%22%9%24%29%22%23%20%19%14%21%

    1309432-183105110113497736832922112-125Strongly oppose14%15%12%-21%4%14%1%10%17%15%13%18%38%11%12%16%18%8%-14%

    742-2-4*1515---26---6Don't know1%1%1%-2%-1%*1%1%*1%---1%1%---1%

    42128713212949339945826116425411430122257478926418SUPPORT47%46%48%100%35%64%46%69%58%40%50%44%64%28%42%45%43%40%58%62%46%

    31322892-4416260102927911620459289222944406319OPPOSE35%36%34%-52%21%35%7%29%42%35%35%27%62%40%34%39%38%26%14%35%

    10859401-1432798429-1849507-5230283482099NET SUPPORT12%9%15%100%-17%43%11%62%29%-3%15%9%37%-34%2%11%5%2%31%48%11%

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 22

    Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    C b F D l

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    24/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-

    TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    120*52111462531*114-1157046803686297103115Strongly support13%*14%s1%15%zq36%zn7%**22%zlm-28%zj14%12%12%14%11%22%zd15%12%13%djlmnq

    s

    3018199629773231248270-303144159226772564711285303Tend to support33%7%53%zs5%39%zq42%zn32%14%l4%51%zlm-72%zj28%40%zh35%31%33%37%24%34%34%hjlmnq

    s

    16163323136281311031045--916711840140196150159Neither support nor18%5%9%18%18%16%18%59%zkl5%9%--18%17%18%16%18%15%12%18%18%ijklrsoppose

    1835766421528186338769194-1177713360170235180194Tend to oppose20%52%zr17%32%zp20%5%25%zo19%45%zkm13%61%zi-23%19%20%25%22%18%12%22%21%ikopr

    130382459661124138825125-824392331161016106125Strongly oppose

    14%34%zr6%45%zp9%1%17%zo7%45%zkm5%39%zi-16%zg11%14%13%15%zc8%37%za13%14%acgikmopr

    723-6-6*23--425*5*-66Don't know1%2%1%-1%-1%*1%1%--1%1%1%*1%*-1%1%

    42182527411134284248384-4182142053061133427617387418SUPPORT47%8%67%zs5%53%zq78%zn39%14%l4%73%zlm-100%zj42%52%zh47%46%44%59%zd39%47%46%dhjlmn

    qs

    313959010121893104617594319-199120226932863322286319OPPOSE35%86%zr24%77%zp28%5%42%zo27%k90%zkm18%100%zi-39%zg30%34%38%37%zc26%49%34%35%acgikm

    opr

    108-86162-94193125-26-22-167289-319418148580195643-410299NET SUPPORT12%-78%43%zs-72%25%zq73%zn-4%-13%-85%55%zlm-100%100%zj3%21%zh12%8%7%33%zd-10%12%zb11%bdhmnq

    s

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 23

    Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    C t b F t D l t

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    25/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulation

    TotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    12023185420335017711286777226533115Strongly support13%15%12%18%7%43%18%6%5%5%8%29%12%19%17%12%13%

    301525012767231399627461371002193516262303Tend to support33%33%34%42%25%31%49%33%19%19%40%43%35%31%42%22%34%

    161203551488506223446731100195052159Neither support nor18%13%23%17%18%10%18%21%16%18%19%13%16%17%13%19%18%oppose

    1833532437811317946728321138157170194Tend to oppose20%23%21%14%29%14%11%27%32%30%24%9%22%14%18%25%21%

    13026142652215334368291385193463125Strongly oppose14%16%9%9%20%2%5%11%29%28%8%6%14%17%9%22%14%

    7-213--5-13142326Don't know

    1%-1%*1%--2%-*1%*1%2%1%1%1%

    4217568182875618811334571661662965722695418SUPPORT47%48%45%60%32%74%66%39%23%24%48%72%47%51%59%34%46%

    3136145701301346112891401123322335105133319OPPOSE35%39%30%23%49%16%16%38%61%58%32%14%36%31%27%47%35%

    1081423112-44441431-55-83541337322121-3899NET SUPPORT12%9%15%37%-16%57%50%*-38%-34%16%57%12%20%31%-13%11%

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 24

    Q.8a. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in your local area?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    26/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    27/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    136111204125163832442133344330143417356566131Strongly support15%14%17%13%14%15%15%24%zln11%11%15%17%15%14%13%13%14%18%14%15%15%l

    38834847133824910858177761046914785551076583200196395Tend to support43%44%40%45%44%45%41%44%46%41%47%i34%50%zi39%48%42%52%g43%42%46%44%i

    169154207166334519733844306242125020509875174Neither support nor19%20%17%25%19%31%zlmn17%15%19%21%20%15%21%20%f10%19%f16%26%zf21%18%19%fioppose

    12710716311944111643229342833243816135865123Tend to oppose14%14%14%10%14%4%16%o8%16%zmo17%h13%17%h9%15%c21%zc15%c13%7%12%15%14%cho

    7559131704291029167361325102369462672Strongly oppose8%8%11%5%8%3%11%zo7%7%9%j3%18%zhjk4%12%zc9%9%4%5%10%6%8%ahj

    76216112124-11-411717Don't know1%1%1%3%1%1%*1%*1%2%-**-2%1%1%1%*1%a

    52446067175076514790221961371031911156914283118264262526SUPPORT58%59%57%57%58%61%56%68%zln57%52%62%i51%65%zik53%60%55%66%g62%56%61%58%i

    202166294189871219248367141573460222210491195OPPOSE22%21%25%14%22%7%27%zmo16%24%o26%hj16%35%zhjk14%27%zc30%zcd24%c17%11%22%21%22%chjo

    322294371331857766912949101321505735816197161171331NET SUPPORT36%37%32%43%37%53%zln29%52%zln33%27%i46%zik16%51%zik27%30%32%49%zefg51%zefg34%40%37%egikn

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 26

    Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    28/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithin

    district UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    1368447-10911227277560712*83084112511131Strongly support15%13%17%-12%12%15%20%27%11%18%12%13%2%11%11%14%9%16%27%15%

    3882791161324531765422851462499534124251537021395Tend to support43%44%43%100%39%59%43%48%42%43%45%43%49%30%47%46%42%45%46%51%44%

    16912747-151214636131224912533115411321327174Neither support nor19%20%17%-18%16%20%26%13%19%15%22%18%21%16%20%19%18%21%17%19%oppose

    1278537-1571017810834893514428420181123Tend to oppose14%14%14%-18%9%14%5%8%16%10%15%16%30%20%15%14%17%12%2%14%

    755121-11358186435371242055117-72Strongly oppose8%8%8%

    -13%3%8%

    *8%10%11%6%5%16%6%7%9%9%4%

    -8%

    734--1512434---141117Don't know1%1%1%--1%1%1%2%1%1%1%---*1%1%1%3%1%

    52436316314254429916936020732011541154335639533526SUPPORT58%58%60%100%51%71%58%68%69%55%63%56%62%33%58%57%57%55%62%78%58%

    20213659-2691597161727012537196213930251195OPPOSE22%22%22%-31%12%22%5%16%26%21%22%20%46%26%23%23%26%16%2%22%

    3222261051164427084531881371947-22393196337032331NET SUPPORT36%36%38%100%19%58%36%62%53%29%42%34%42%-14%32%34%33%28%46%76%37%

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 27

    Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    29/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    136-6111307061--131911876558942103286119131Strongly support15%-16%s1%17%zq41%zn8%--25%zlm3%28%zj15%14%14%17%13%22%zd14%14%15%djlmnq

    s

    388-3171538079317--395862662001962851103356018365395Tend to support43%-84%zs11%49%zq46%43%--75%zlm27%63%zj39%50%zh44%44%43%47%42%44%44%hjlmqs

    169--2914518155174--46241066813638156184168174Neither support nor19%--22%19%11%21%zo100%zkl--14%i6%21%17%21%15%20%14%9%20%z19%ijkloroppose

    s

    12778-44783119-123-106668558340109146113123Tend to oppose14%71%zr-34%zp10%2%16%zo-63%zkm-33%zi2%13%14%13%16%14%11%14%14%14%ikmopr

    7532-4032-72-72-6925319561766695972Strongly oppose8%29%zr-30%zp4%-10%zo-37%zkm-22%zi*11%zg5%8%7%9%5%21%za7%8%agikmop

    r

    7--2516---42527-61-57Don't know1%--2%1%1%1%---1%*1%*1%-1%1%-1%1%a

    524-37716510149377--526943842762513741524388925484526SUPPORT58%-100%zs12%66%zq87%zn52%--100%zlm30%92%zj54%64%zh57%62%57%69%zd56%58%58%dhjlmn

    qs

    202111-841113192-195-175812273138571752015172195OPPOSE22%100%zr-64%zp14%2%26%zo-100%zkm-55%zi2%24%19%21%23%23%16%35%a21%22%aikmop

    r

    322-111377-684001461860-195526-8137515417723695263689312331NET SUPPORT36%-100%100%zs-52%52%zq85%zn25%0%-100%100%zl-25%90%zj30%45%zh36%39%34%53%zd21%38%zb37%bdhjln

    qs

    y p(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 28

    Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    30/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulationTotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total

    (o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    13625266021355822811367783277834131Strongly support15%16%17%20%8%46%21%7%5%5%10%33%13%24%20%12%15%

    38867671481053315014834841731102914520094395Tend to support43%43%44%49%39%43%53%51%23%35%50%47%47%40%52%33%44%

    169263347601526736458225106185058174Neither support nor19%17%22%15%22%2%18%23%25%19%24%11%17%16%13%21%19%oppose

    12723193147513394455431391103953123Tend to oppose14%15%13%10%17%7%5%13%30%23%12%5%15%9%10%19%14%

    751361730281522461164712154372Strongly oppose8%9%4%6%11%3%3%5%15%19%3%3%7%11%4%15%8%

    71-15-231122514-7Don't know1%1%-*2%-1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%-1%

    524929320812668209170429520918637571277128526SUPPORT58%59%62%68%47%89%73%58%29%39%60%80%60%63%72%45%58%

    2023625487772153661015519138225496195OPPOSE22%23%17%16%29%10%8%18%45%42%16%8%22%20%14%34%22%

    32256681604961187116-24-61541682374922332331NET SUPPORT36%36%45%53%18%79%66%40%-17%-2%44%72%38%44%58%11%37%

    (FINAL - General Public)Table 29

    Q.8b. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury, by that I mean Canterbury as well as Herne Bay, Whitstable andthe surrounding area as shown on this map?

    Base : All Respondents

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    31/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL General Public)

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    32/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/CanterburyTotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    2201862862083158417937515176502358315311797215Strongly support24%24%24%22%24%29%22%31%l20%20%23%25%26%23%20%23%25%28%25%23%24%l

    429392521542562120701858411789153975411470109230214444Tend to support48%50%44%52%49%58%46%53%48%46%53%44%52%45%47%45%56%57%eg49%50%49%

    100821639583684425231930291430816494898Neither support nor11%10%14%10%11%8%14%m6%11%14%10%10%10%14%12%12%7%9%10%11%11%oppose

    887511582429647222021232315251311424587Tend to oppose10%10%10%16%9%4%11%o5%12%zmo12%9%11%8%11%13%c10%10%6%9%10%10%

    57439-5121652812921101492522302252Strongly oppose6%5%7%-6%2%6%4%7%6%4%10%zhj3%6%c8%cd10%zcd2%1%6%5%6%c

    871-8-31341213-41-528Don't know1%1%1%-1%-1%1%1%2%*1%*1%-2%1%-1%1%1%

    64957880226349317811126412116814023014776172101162347311658SUPPORT72%74%68%73%73%87%zln68%84%zln68%66%76%k69%78%zik68%67%67%81%efg85%zefg73%73%73%ekln

    14511820513364612753429423337245015137267138OPPOSE16%15%17%16%15%5%17%mo9%19%zmo19%h13%21%zhj11%17%c21%c19%zc12%7%15%16%15%chmo

    5044606017501871329918987139981971105212386149276244520NET SUPPORT56%59%51%57%58%82%zln50%75%zln49%47%63%ik48%67%zik51%46%48%68%zefg78%zefg58%57%58%efgikln

    (FINAL - General Public)Table 31

    Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    33/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    22014570-1424176474012688127221953144194011215Strongly support24%23%26%-17%32%24%35%40%19%27%22%13%12%27%19%24%17%26%27%24%

    42931113314540358694732316428010927133278627429444Tend to support48%49%49%100%54%52%48%51%47%49%50%49%60%57%38%49%47%53%48%69%49%

    1006830-9584133813068111329641517298Neither support nor11%11%11%-11%6%11%10%3%12%9%12%5%5%18%11%11%13%11%4%11%oppose

    886224-105725772266112835631311-87Tend to oppose10%10%9%-12%6%10%3%7%11%8%11%5%10%12%13%11%11%7%-10%

    573913-5244124920323231937610-52Strongly oppose6%6%5%-6%3%6%1%2%7%6%6%18%15%5%7%6%5%6%-6%

    853-1-71-717--12412-8Don't know1%1%1%-1%-1%*-1%*1%--1%1%1%1%1%-1%

    64945620315864534116874492524061310461864238111440658SUPPORT72%72%74%100%70%84%72%86%88%68%77%71%73%69%65%69%72%70%74%96%73%

    14510137-1571166912146934412551001820-138OPPOSE16%16%14%-18%10%16%4%9%18%14%16%22%26%16%20%17%16%13%-15%

    50435516514357418110783282063149634132323639440520NET SUPPORT56%56%61%100%52%75%56%81%78%50%63%55%51%43%48%49%55%54%61%96%58%

    (FINAL - General Public)Table 32

    Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    34/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis- TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    220794-2159012426717824169112102156591704512194215Strongly support24%7%25%s-28%zq53%zn17%15%l4%34%zlm7%40%zj22%26%24%24%22%35%zd28%23%24%djlmnq

    s

    42963234-4447037484632951322192382063271173875617417444Tend to support48%57%62%z-58%zq41%51%zo49%l32%56%zl41%52%j47%52%50%47%50%44%39%50%z49%jloq

    10020193760118739332350156334742489869198Neither support nor11%18%zr5%29%zp8%6%12%zo23%zk17%zk4%16%zi4%12%9%11%10%12%6%13%11%11%ikoproppose

    8814204938-8715522066856315631731437587Tend to oppose10%13%r5%37%zp5%-12%zo9%k26%zkm4%21%zi2%11%8%9%12%9%11%8%9%10%ikopr

    57754110-5273954623517381347564552Strongly oppose

    6%6%r1%32%zp1%-7%zo4%k20%zkm1%14%zi*7%4%6%5%6%4%13%5%6%ikopr8-434172153443438--68Don't know1%-1%3%zp1%1%1%1%*1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%--1%1%p

    64970329-6581604981107047315538835030848317555710130611658SUPPORT72%63%87%zs-85%zq93%zn68%64%l36%90%zlm49%93%zj69%78%zh74%71%72%79%66%74%73%hjlmnq

    s

    14521259048-1382291251111190489444120199120138OPPOSE16%19%r7%69%zp6%-19%zo13%k47%zkm5%35%zi3%18%zg12%14%18%15%15%21%14%15%agikop

    r

    50449303-9061016036089-21447443782602603881314378320491520NET SUPPORT56%44%80%zs-69%79%zq93%zn49%51%l-11%85%zlm14%90%zj51%66%zh59%53%56%65%46%59%z58%hjlnqs

    ( Ge e a ub c)Table 33

    Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    35/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulation TotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    2204833963237103461125741031512813246215Strongly support24%31%22%32%12%48%36%16%8%10%21%44%24%25%34%16%24%

    4297181156128341511636210719410832146193128444Tend to support48%46%54%51%48%44%53%56%42%44%56%46%52%41%50%45%49%

    1001412304041931263440106612223198Neither support nor11%9%8%10%15%5%7%11%18%14%12%4%11%11%6%11%11%oppose

    8816111044263227422895114194687Tend to oppose10%11%7%3%17%3%2%11%19%17%8%4%8%12%5%16%10%

    57610922-51616321022911143052Strongly oppose6%4%7%3%8%-2%5%11%13%3%1%5%10%4%11%6%

    8-321--4232151418Don't know1%-2%1%*--1%2%1%1%*1%1%1%*1%

    649119114252160712542097313326721047374325174658SUPPORT72%77%76%83%60%92%90%72%50%55%77%91%76%66%84%62%73%

    14523211967211484473381180253476138OPPOSE16%15%14%6%25%3%4%16%30%30%11%5%13%22%9%27%15%

    5049693233936824416229592292003935029198520NET SUPPORT56%62%62%77%35%89%86%55%20%25%66%86%63%44%76%35%58%

    Table 34

    Q.9.1. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that enough affordable homes were provided for local residents

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    36/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 36

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    37/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury

    TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    594411-55114172271923713515914262955Strongly support7%6%9%-6%1%5%13%zlno6%4%8%h11%zhk2%6%4%6%7%7%5%7%6%h

    33530540153306192481415986531487443885091173172345Tend to support37%39%34%53%38%57%zlmn35%36%36%32%39%i26%50%zijk34%38%34%40%47%zeg37%40%38%ik

    153142197152253825693437286231193624518477161Neither support nor17%18%16%23%17%23%15%19%18%18%17%14%21%15%16%14%19%27%zeg18%18%18%eoppose

    21918728520912722797546150515832613529115100215Tend to oppose24%24%24%18%24%11%27%o21%25%o29%zh27%h24%17%27%c28%c24%c28%c15%24%23%24%cho

    12799192115645155228184625381650867147118Strongly oppose14%13%16%7%13%6%17%zo11%14%15%hj8%23%zhj9%18%zcd14%c20%zcd6%3%15%11%13%cdhjo

    981-922-521331-6-2539Don't know 1%1%1%-1%2%1%-1%1%*2%1%*-2%z-1%1%1%1%

    394349511538563106651636610476154864810359104199201400SUPPORT44%45%43%53%44%58%zln40%49%42%36%47%ik37%52%zik40%42%40%47%54%zefg42%47%44%ik

    34628647732418117421508279967696481114335185147333OPPOSE38%36%40%25%37%16%44%zmo32%o39%o45%zh36%h47%zhj26%45%zc42%c43%zc34%c18%39%34%37%cho

    4863486145-112313-1625-2078-10*-81670135467NET SUPPORT5%8%3%28%7%42%zlmn-4%18%zln3%n-9%11%zik-10%27%zijk-5%*-3%13%efg36%zdefg3%13%zb7%befgikln

    p

    Table 36

    Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It increases the demands on public services

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 37

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    38/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    593124-81464192934212-6144536155Strongly support7%5%9%-9%2%6%3%19%4%10%4%11%-8%5%8%2%4%2%6%

    33525392-22432797636231132214932794201476928345Tend to support37%40%34%-26%57%38%56%36%35%40%37%53%18%38%35%34%41%45%68%38%

    15310753-8131393020108511091410529424376161Neither support nor17%17%20%-10%17%19%22%20%16%16%19%9%27%14%19%16%21%24%15%18%oppose

    219152621311416918171786415122207216123274215Tend to oppose24%24%23%100%37%19%23%13%17%27%20%26%9%14%29%26%27%20%17%9%24%

    1278235-153100571064573368348517142118Strongly oppose14%13%13%-18%4%14%4%7%16%14%13%18%41%11%13%14%14%9%4%13%

    935--1811726---551119Don't know1%1%2%--1%1%1%1%1%1%1%---2%1%1%1%2%1%

    394284116-2945325815526016523511333109246507529400SUPPORT44%45%43%-35%59%44%60%56%39%50%41%64%18%47%40%42%43%49%70%44%

    34623598145182692324284109224582810624640416333OPPOSE38%37%36%100%55%23%36%17%24%43%33%39%27%56%39%39%42%34%27%13%37%

    484918-1-1627565731-2456117-653*10342467NET SUPPORT5%8%7%-100%-19%35%8%42%32%-4%17%2%37%-38%7%1%*9%22%57%7%

    Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It increases the demands on public services

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 38

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    39/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis- TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    59221-553223*25245129254114381744855Strongly support7%2%5%-7%zq19%zn3%*1%10%zlm1%12%zj6%6%6%6%5%13%zd10%6%6%djlmnq

    335191923343102243392028463234177169256892955015324345Tend to support37%18%51%zs2%44%zq60%zn33%23%l10%54%zlm20%56%zj35%43%zh39%36%38%39%35%39%38%hjlmnq

    s

    153185720140351265624804168976411645142188149161Neither support nor17%16%15%16%18%20%17%32%zkl12%15%13%16%19%16%18%18%18%14%18%18%18%jkloppose

    219428644171-215556986118501229316055188264201215Tend to oppose24%38%zr23%33%zp22%-29%zo32%zk36%zk16%37%zi12%24%23%24%22%24%21%9%24%b24%bikop

    12728186355-1182179189311793980381031512102118Strongly oppose14%26%zr5%48%zp7%-16%zo12%k40%zkm3%29%zi3%15%zg10%12%15%13%12%27%za12%13%agikop

    r

    9-417362-7-544358*159Don't know1%-1%1%1%2%1%1%-1%-1%1%1%1%2%f1%*1%1%1%af

    3942221233981342664023336662842061942961043336720372400SUPPORT44%20%56%zs2%52%zq78%zn36%23%l12%64%zlm21%68%zj41%49%zh45%42%43%53%44%45%44%hjlmnq

    s

    34671104107226-3337614810421161201132240932914216303333OPPOSE38%64%zr28%81%zp29%-46%zo44%zk76%zkm20%66%zi15%40%33%37%38%38%33%37%37%37%ikopr

    48-49108-104171134-67-36-125232-1452235625711422636867NET SUPPORT5%-44%29%zs-79%22%zq78%zn-9%-21%-64%44%zlm-45%53%zj1%16%zh9%e4%5%20%zd8%8%z7%dehmns

    Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It increases the demands on public services

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 39

    Q 9 2 I i i l d t th b ildi f h i th f t i th di t i t f C t b h l if ?

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    40/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulation TotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    59963110172195710353911262455Strongly support7%6%4%10%4%23%7%3%3%3%3%15%6%9%7%9%6%

    3356257138803414211034581611062374517889345Tend to support37%40%38%46%30%45%50%38%23%24%46%46%38%40%46%32%38%

    1532334514913584823425542103216137161Neither support nor17%15%23%17%18%17%21%16%16%17%16%18%16%19%16%13%18%oppose

    219423548817468548758933153238167215Tend to oppose24%27%24%16%30%8%16%29%33%31%26%14%25%20%21%24%24%

    12718173047414373661321283123262118Strongly oppose14%11%11%10%18%5%5%13%25%25%9%5%13%11%8%22%13%

    91151224---471629Don't know1%1%1%2%*2%1%1%---2%1%1%1%1%1%

    39471631699052163119396517114127756205113400SUPPORT44%46%42%56%34%67%57%41%26%27%49%61%44%50%53%40%44%

    3466052791281060123841361214523735113129333OPPOSE38%39%35%26%48%14%21%42%58%56%35%19%38%31%29%46%37%

    48111090-3841102-4-45-725096402192-1667NET SUPPORT5%7%7%30%-14%54%36%-1%-31%-30%14%42%6%19%24%-6%7%

    Q.9.2. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It increases the demands on public services

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    41/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 41

    Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    42/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury

    TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    24320036523130625192436746805326673752128108236Strongly support27%25%31%19%27%28%24%38%zln24%24%30%23%27%25%23%26%30%27%27%25%26%

    44840747164355913761190811111071551096211865100234219454Tend to support50%52%zr40%53%50%55%52%46%49%44%50%52%53%51%54%46%52%52%50%51%50%kr

    11094197106143413483627183228123111305756113Neither support nor12%12%16%23%12%13%13%10%12%19%zhij12%9%11%13%10%12%9%16%12%13%13%oppose

    615310161319437159162217720127303262Tend to oppose7%7%8%5%7%3%7%3%9%zm8%4%8%8%8%6%8%9%4%6%7%7%

    35265-30210317751736717-2191331Strongly oppose4%3%4%-4%2%4%3%4%4%2%8%zhj1%3%6%cd7%zcdg-1%4%3%3%h

    541-5-2-322-1212--415Don't know1%1%1%-1%-1%-1%1%1%-*1%1%1%--1%*1%

    69160783216668819911228212417815323516288185102152363327690SUPPORT77%77%71%72%77%82%76%85%zln73%68%81%k75%80%k75%77%72%82%79%77%76%77%ekl

    96791519152975322143226231437129494594OPPOSE11%10%13%5%11%5%11%5%14%zmo12%j6%16%zhj9%11%c12%c14%zc9%5%10%10%10%cj

    5955286820574831701052291021641202091397514891143313283596NET SUPPORT66%67%r58%67%66%78%zln65%79%zln59%56%74%zik59%71%ik65%65%58%73%e75%zeg66%66%66%eiklr

    Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that young people and families could stay in the district

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 42

    Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    43/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    24315680-1528192484014596140412263150264614236Strongly support27%25%29%-18%36%26%36%41%22%29%24%25%7%30%23%25%22%30%34%26%

    4483201341483736869443361602946930139296627224454Tend to support50%51%49%100%58%49%50%51%44%51%49%51%32%57%43%51%50%53%47%58%50%

    1108231-11696158893875517337313243113Neither support nor12%13%11%-14%8%13%11%8%14%12%13%28%10%10%12%12%11%15%8%13%oppose

    614617-535435542042329244796-62Tend to oppose7%7%6%-6%3%7%2%5%8%6%7%15%11%12%9%8%8%4%-7%

    352110-2227-2301318-23112335-31Strongly oppose4%3%4%-3%3%4%-2%4%4%3%-15%4%4%4%3%3%-3%

    541-1-4--514--1223--5Don't know1%1%1%-1%-1%--1%*1%--1%1%*3%--1%

    69147621416365560117854812554351010522024468711839690SUPPORT77%76%78%100%76%85%76%87%85%73%78%76%57%64%73%74%75%75%77%92%77%

    966727-858137843460341135701211-94OPPOSE11%11%10%-9%7%11%2%7%13%10%11%15%26%16%13%12%11%7%-10%

    595409187155604791147839722237476411673757510739596NET SUPPORT66%65%69%100%67%79%65%85%79%60%68%65%41%38%57%61%64%65%70%92%66%

    p p , y pp pp g yIt meant that young people and families could stay in the district

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 43

    Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    44/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    24310115-23686151291019627182136100166701944212215236Strongly support27%9%30%zs-31%zq50%zn21%17%l5%37%zlm8%43%zj27%25%25%28%25%33%26%26%26%jlmnqs

    44877231-4547038480772931552152362183341203896520422454Tend to support50%70%z61%z-59%zq41%53%zo46%40%56%zlm49%52%46%55%zh51%48%50%51%44%51%50%hloq

    11012195459169750362556137241862710496107113Neither support nor12%11%r5%41%zp8%9%13%29%zkl19%zk5%18%zi3%14%11%13%11%13%7%13%13%13%cikproppose

    61864418-62104565144319441854865262Tend to oppose7%7%r2%34%zp2%-9%zo6%k23%zkm1%16%zi1%9%zg5%7%7%7%6%13%6%7%agikopr

    3534283-3122642821813221028322931Strongly oppose4%3%1%21%zp*-4%zo1%13%zkm1%9%zi*4%3%3%4%4%2%4%3%3%ikmopr

    5-25--52-231223241-45Don't know1%-1%4%zp--1%1%-*1%**1%*1%1%1%-*1%

    69188346-6901555351098848918239737231850118958310731637690SUPPORT77%79%92%zs-89%zq91%zn73%63%l45%93%zlm57%95%zj73%81%zh76%77%75%84%zd70%77%77%hjlmnq

    9611107222-9412711079762326628831178094OPPOSE11%10%r3%55%zp3%-13%zo7%k36%zkm2%25%zi2%12%8%10%11%11%9%17%10%10%aikopr

    59577336-7266815544197174791033903102864351615009624557596NET SUPPORT66%69%89%zs-55%87%zq91%zn60%56%l9%91%zlm32%93%zj61%73%zh66%65%65%75%zd54%67%z66%dhjlmn

    q

    It meant that young people and families could stay in the district

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 44

    Q.9.3. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant that young people and families could stay in the district

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    45/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulationTotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total

    (o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    24354381063440105611629891051642813355236Strongly support27%35%25%35%13%52%37%21%11%12%26%45%26%25%35%20%26%

    4487079145145291461706411419510531854199136454Tend to support50%45%53%48%54%38%51%58%44%47%56%45%51%48%52%48%50%

    11013203443723362745391677162935113Neither support nor12%8%14%11%16%9%8%12%19%19%11%7%12%14%8%12%13%oppose

    61141092915133036164437143662Tend to oppose7%9%7%3%11%1%2%5%20%15%5%2%7%7%4%13%7%

    3553714-5108177117771931Strongly oppose4%3%2%2%5%-2%3%5%7%2%1%3%6%2%7%3%

    5--23-13-22-4-215Don't know 1%--1%1%-*1%-1%*-1%-1%*1%

    691124117251179692512308114228421048283332191690SUPPORT77%80%78%83%67%90%89%79%56%59%82%91%77%73%86%68%77%

    9619131643192337532366014215594OPPOSE11%12%8%5%16%1%3%8%26%22%7%2%10%13%6%20%10%

    59510510523413768242207448926120442168311136596NET SUPPORT66%68%70%77%51%89%85%71%30%37%75%88%68%61%81%48%66%

    It meant that young people and families could stay in the district

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    46/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 46

    Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    47/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/Canterbury

    TotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    3226513039136211145911048211031Strongly support4%3%5%2%3%2%3%10%zlno2%1%5%k7%zhk2%4%1%4%3%4%4%2%3%kl

    129117125122213722502523324928153517346465129Tend to support14%15%10%16%14%20%14%16%13%13%11%16%17%13%13%14%13%18%14%15%14%

    10588163101122616472127263119122914304757104Neither support nor12%11%14%9%12%11%10%12%12%11%12%13%10%9%11%11%11%16%10%13%12%oppose

    27824732142655680301135970461036437644073148130279Tend to oppose31%31%27%47%31%52%zlmn30%23%29%32%i32%i23%35%i30%33%25%32%38%ze31%30%31%ei

    352302518344151105017076888610494491164946191163354Strongly oppose39%39%44%26%40%14%42%o38%o44%zo41%40%42%35%44%c43%c45%zc39%c24%40%38%39%co

    65--5121113-22-12-235Don't know

    1%1%--1%1%1%1%**1%-1%1%-1%2%-*1%1%

    161143185153244535562634465436164621428575160SUPPORT18%18%15%18%18%22%17%26%zln14%14%15%23%zk18%17%14%18%16%22%18%18%18%l

    630549832160971190802821351581322071588718089119339293633OPPOSE70%70%71%73%70%66%72%m61%73%m74%71%65%71%73%c76%c70%71%62%72%68%70%cm

    -469-407-66-16-457-47-145-46-226-109-124-86-153-121-71-134-68-78-254-218-472NET SUPPORT-52%-52%-56%-55%-53%-44%-55%-35%-59%-59%-56%-42%-52%-56%-62%-53%-55%-41%-54%-51%-52%

    It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 47

    Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    48/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to one TotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    321615-2127312162011---62613-31Strongly support4%2%6%-3%2%4%2%12%2%6%2%---2%4%1%2%-3%

    1298346-81710424198448814173478142512129Tend to support14%13%17%-9%22%14%18%19%13%15%14%22%8%10%12%13%12%16%29%14%

    1056836-612862016664065-2737699224104Neither support nor12%11%13%-7%16%12%15%16%10%12%11%-10%10%14%12%8%14%10%12%oppose

    27821662-2426229603218381197732577165435516279Tend to oppose31%34%23%-28%34%31%44%32%28%25%34%42%19%35%28%28%37%36%37%31%

    352243111143192912620307137217693211824948489354Strongly oppose39%39%41%100%51%25%39%19%20%47%42%38%36%63%44%43%42%42%31%21%39%

    632-1132-314--114--15Don't know1%1%1%-1%1%*1%-**1%--1%*1%--3%1%

    1619961-10181312731100699241740104162912160SUPPORT18%16%23%-12%24%18%20%31%15%21%16%22%8%10%15%18%13%19%29%18%

    6304591731664552186524902184141412561944149110324633OPPOSE70%73%63%100%80%59%70%63%52%74%67%72%78%82%79%72%70%79%67%58%70%

    -469-361-112-1-56-27-390-58-20-390-150-323-10-11-49-155-311-76-74-12-472NET SUPPORT-52%-57%-41%-100%-68%-35%-53%-43%-21%-59%-46%-56%-56%-74%-69%-57%-53%-65%-48%-28%-52%

    g g p

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 48

    Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    49/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-

    TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    32-7-312371-30228191224723842631Strongly support4%-2%-4%zq14%zn1%1%-6%zlm1%7%zj4%3%4%3%3%6%8%3%3%jlmnqr

    12952911289039125111209570599633108215118129Tend to support14%4%8%1%17%zq52%zn5%7%l2%21%zlm6%23%zj14%15%15%13%14%17%11%14%14%jlmnqr

    s

    105831119357472097418565351792586184100104Neither support nor12%8%8%8%12%33%zn6%12%l5%14%zl6%13%j10%13%12%10%11%14%8%12%12%jlnroppose

    2782717527252-279574417582144163116207712473212258279Tend to oppose31%25%46%zs20%33%zq-38%zo33%l23%33%l26%34%zj32%29%32%29%32%25%27%31%31%jloq

    3527013292261-35481137132195922011532451093054920321354Strongly oppose39%64%zr35%71%zp34%-48%zo47%zk70%zkm25%61%zi22%40%39%37%44%39%38%46%39%39%ikopr

    6-3-5141-42323325--55Don't know1%-1%-1%1%1%*-1%1%1%*1%1%1%1%--1%1%

    16153611591134713514122124897112040130309144160SUPPORT18%4%9%1%21%zq66%zn6%8%l2%27%zlm7%30%zj18%18%18%16%17%23%19%17%18%jlmnqr

    s

    63098307119514-6331391813072772363642694531805538032580633OPPOSE70%88%z81%z91%zp67%-87%zo80%zk93%zkm58%87%zi56%72%68%69%73%71%62%72%70%70%ikop

    -469-93-271-118-354113-586-126-176-166-255-112-274-198-332-140-422-50-24-435-472NET SUPPORT-52%-84%-72%-90%-46%66%-80%-72%-90%-31%-80%-27%-54%-50%-51%-57%-55%-39%-53%-53%-52%

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 49

    Q.9.4. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant building on greenfield i.e. land that is undeveloped

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    50/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulation

    TotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    3276153914525519262181031Strongly support4%5%4%5%1%12%5%2%1%2%1%8%4%2%5%4%3%

    12922306692758301110506494138016129Tend to support14%14%20%22%3%35%20%10%7%4%14%28%15%12%21%6%14%

    10519144823759171218383668174922104Neither support nor12%12%10%16%8%9%21%6%8%7%11%15%11%15%13%8%12%oppose

    2785147937820971062858122681874112179279Tend to oppose31%33%31%31%29%26%34%36%19%24%35%29%30%37%31%28%31%

    3525553801551355136911511324324637117151354Strongly oppose39%35%35%26%58%17%20%46%63%62%38%19%39%33%30%53%39%

    62-1-11-211132135Don't know1%1%-*-1%*-1%**1%*1%*1%1%

    1612936811136723412155583120169827160SUPPORT18%19%24%27%4%47%25%12%8%6%16%36%19%14%25%9%18%

    6301051001732343415224212020825411143278237230633OPPOSE70%68%66%57%87%44%54%83%82%86%73%48%69%70%62%82%70%

    -469-76-64-93-2222-80-207-107-193-199-28-312-63-140-203-472NET SUPPORT-52%-49%-42%-31%-83%3%-28%-71%-74%-80%-57%-12%-50%-56%-36%-72%-52%

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    51/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 51

    Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    52/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/CanterburyTotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    1841662181803146387123444675371950305210484188Strongly support20%21%18%28%21%28%n17%29%zln18%13%20%22%k26%k17%16%19%24%27%fg22%20%21%k

    4233755212413561276617085109961381064711063101215212427Tend to support47%48%44%40%48%52%48%50%44%46%49%47%47%49%41%43%50%53%f45%49%47%

    11395176105112715583528193022133717236646112Neither support nor13%12%14%22%12%11%10%11%15%z19%zhi13%9%10%10%12%15%13%12%14%11%12%oppose

    10995123103637854242719362524351394957106Tend to oppose12%12%10%10%12%5%14%mo6%14%mo13%12%10%12%12%c21%zcdeg14%c10%5%10%13%12%c

    695016-644245321412231623112326362965Strongly oppose8%6%13%zs-7%3%9%4%8%8%6%11%zhj6%11%zcd9%cd9%cd2%3%8%7%7%cds

    43--3-2-2211-211--313Don't know

    **--*-1%-*1%**-1%1%*--1%**6075427320593871731032411081521412131436516093153319296615SUPPORT67%69%62%68%68%81%zln66%78%zln62%59%69%k70%k72%k67%57%63%74%ef80%zefg67%69%68%efkl

    17814427316796113863940425248355815158586172OPPOSE20%18%23%10%19%9%23%zmo10%22%zmo21%18%21%18%22%cd31%zcd23%cd12%8%18%20%19%cmo

    429397461742677112901557011399161953010277138233210443NET SUPPORT48%51%zr39%58%49%72%zln43%68%zln40%38%51%k49%k55%k44%f26%40%f62%zefg72%zefg49%49%49%efklnr

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 52

    Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area

    B All

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    53/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to oneTotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    18411968-10211564235110781104*1448116154215188Strongly support20%19%25%-12%28%21%31%35%17%24%19%22%2%20%18%20%13%27%36%21%

    4233091181434034369473061612668530122273626922427Tend to support47%49%43%100%52%52%46%51%47%46%49%46%44%35%41%45%46%54%45%52%47%

    1137636-989515108436762212427613185112Neither support nor13%12%13%-11%11%13%11%10%13%11%13%12%11%17%16%13%12%12%12%12%oppose

    1097531-1268985932878261035751813-106Tend to oppose12%12%12%-14%8%12%6%5%14%9%14%11%41%13%13%13%16%9%-12%

    694719-8156136225402252248710-65Strongly oppose8%7%7%-9%2%8%1%3%9%8%7%11%11%8%8%8%6%6%-7%

    43--1-3--3-3---23-1-3Don't know*1%--1%-*--1%-1%---1%*-1%-*

    6074281871546149811182416239376116441703907711137615SUPPORT67%68%68%100%64%80%67%82%82%63%73%65%66%37%62%63%66%66%73%88%68%

    17812250-19714597155531184815571232523-172OPPOSE20%19%18%-23%9%20%7%7%23%16%21%23%52%21%21%21%22%15%-19%

    42930613713454353102742621862577-229113267528837443NET SUPPORT48%49%50%100%41%71%48%76%75%40%57%45%43%-15%41%42%45%44%57%88%49%

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B/C/D - z/E/F/G/H - z/I/J - z/K/L/M - z/N/O/P/Q - z/R/S* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 53

    Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area

    Base : All

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    54/323

    Support for building inGrowth of economy asPlanning for homes asSee housing as aSatisfaction withChange of opinionDevelopment plussesDevelopment concernsSupport for building in districtareaprioritypriorityprioritylocal area

    UnwtdSwitch toSwitch toNeither/Dis-

    TotalsupportopposeNoYesNoYesnorOpposeSupportOpposeSupportNoYesNoYesNoYessatisfiedSatisfiedWtd Total (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90211637313476817372916920252431342150839463726577213044833902Unweighted Total

    90211137713177117273017419552631941850839465524777412844*829902Weighted Total

    90210433012368315665015118246627937845435256724168911737749806Effective Base

    184684-18878110256156221481008814345153359170188Strongly support20%5%22%s-24%zq45%zn15%14%l3%30%zlm7%35%zj20%22%22%18%20%27%20%21%21%jlmnqs

    42361217-4277635176612861262132321953161113685918400427Tend to support47%55%58%z-55%zq44%48%44%l31%54%zlm40%51%j46%50%48%45%48%46%41%48%z47%jlq

    1137344567179542274248286943813193183107112Neither support nor13%7%9%35%zp9%10%13%24%zkl14%k8%15%i7%14%11%12%13%12%14%6%13%12%ikproppose

    1092331456211061955316719594770379512792106Tend to oppose12%21%zr8%34%zp8%1%14%zo11%k28%zkm6%21%zi5%12%12%11%15%12%9%16%11%12%aikopr

    6914123926-658451253104619442161575665Strongly oppose8%12%zr3%30%zp3%-9%zo5%23%zkm2%17%zi2%9%zg5%7%9%8%4%16%za7%7%agikopr

    4--22-331-3-22223--33Don't know

    *--1%*-*1%zk*-1%-***1%*--**

    60767301-615153462101674421483613322834591565219327571615SUPPORT67%60%80%zs-80%zq89%zn63%58%l34%84%zlm47%86%zj65%72%zh70%63%67%73%62%69%68%hjlmnq

    17836438488117128100431212910666114581561614147172OPPOSE20%33%zr11%64%zp11%1%23%zo16%k51%zkm8%38%zi7%21%17%17%23%z20%13%32%za18%19%aikopr

    42931258-8452715229173-3339928332226217345983667713423443NET SUPPORT48%28%68%zs-64%68%zq89%zn40%42%l-17%76%zlm9%79%zj44%55%zh53%ze40%47%60%zd29%51%zb49%bdehjl

    nqs

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d - z/e/f - z/g/h - z/i/j - z/k/l/m - z/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 54

    Q.9.5. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It helped to create jobs by attracting people and businesses to the area

    Base : All

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    55/323

    Enough employmentKey factors for option choiceOption selectionFuture developmentopportunitiesEnough homes

    UnwtdPopulation

    TotalHousinggrowthJob growthGreenfieldDCBALess homesThe sameMore homesDisagreeAgreeDisagreeAgreeWtd Total (o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    90216015429826375287289145233335244629105396275902Unweighted Total

    90215615030326877*284293145242348232623112*385282902Weighted Total

    9021491362642336725825713020230022355993357243806Effective Base

    18443279022378345122665911412711545188Strongly support20%28%18%30%8%48%29%15%8%11%19%39%23%24%30%16%21%

    423667915511832156152528819311529945190126427Tend to support47%43%52%51%44%42%55%52%36%36%56%50%48%40%49%45%47%

    11314183246524372843381275153430112Neither support nor13%9%12%10%17%7%8%13%19%18%11%5%12%14%9%11%12%oppose

    1092117145021143304635869113339106Tend to oppose12%13%12%5%19%2%4%15%21%19%10%4%11%10%9%14%12%

    6911812291101421381553714124065Strongly oppose8%7%6%4%11%1%4%5%15%16%4%2%6%13%3%14%7%

    4---3--1321-2-113Don't know

    *---1%--*2%1%*-*-***

    607109106245141692391966411425820644172304171615SUPPORT67%70%71%81%53%90%84%67%44%47%74%89%71%64%79%61%68%

    178322626793215851845114106264680172OPPOSE20%21%17%9%29%3%8%20%35%35%15%6%17%23%12%28%19%

    4297781219626621713913302081933344625992443NET SUPPORT48%50%54%72%23%86%76%47%9%12%60%83%54%41%67%32%49%

    Base : All

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/A/B - z/C/D - z/E/F/G - z/H/I/J/K - z/L/M/N/O* small base

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    56/323

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 56

    Q.9.6. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant an increase in traffic and congestion

    Base : All

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    57/323

    DisabilityEthnicityWorking statusAreaAgeGenderStudent

    Unwtd(uni/CanterburyTotalNoYesBMEWhitecollege)RetiredUnemployedEmployedRural areasHerne BayWhitstableCityOver 6555-6435-5425-3416-24FemaleMaleWtd Total

    (s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    902768134288717929411840221622422823424113729194139452450902Unweighted Total

    90278511729**869107*263132386184221203294215115256125*192473429902Weighted Total

    902686123267787428610435420220021021623513127384128401407806Effective Base

    39315-36210131138223929411162036Strongly support4%4%4%-4%2%4%10%zlno3%1%4%11%zhjk1%4%2%4%4%6%3%5%4%hk

    158138227153264525623527267234224322398279160Tend to support18%18%19%25%18%25%17%19%16%19%j12%13%24%zij16%19%17%18%21%17%18%18%ij

    11210211311025331143242525392972319354865113Neither support nor12%13%10%9%13%23%zlmn13%8%11%13%11%12%13%14%f6%9%15%f18%zef10%15%zb13%befoppose

    30427538132974083451396880591076644843980176138313Tend to oppose34%35%33%45%34%37%32%34%36%37%36%29%36%31%39%33%31%42%g37%32%35%i

    286237406270149038132528170747639964026151126277Strongly oppose32%30%34%20%31%13%34%o29%o34%o28%37%zh35%h25%35%c34%c37%zc32%c14%32%29%31%cho

    32--2-21-21--111--122Don't know

    **--*-1%1%

    -1%

    *--*1%

    *--***197169277189285638723835497543245227519898196SUPPORT22%22%23%25%22%26%21%29%l19%21%16%24%j25%j20%21%20%21%27%21%23%22%j

    590512791956754173832711201611291811428318080106326264590OPPOSE65%65%67%66%65%51%66%o63%70%zo65%73%zhi64%61%66%c72%c70%zc64%55%69%za62%65%aco

    -393-343-51-12-378-26-117-45-199-82-126-80-106-99-59-128-53-55-229-165-394NET SUPPORT-44%-44%-44%-40%-44%-24%-45%-34%-51%-44%-57%-40%-36%-46%-52%-50%-42%-29%-48%-39%-44%

    Fieldwork dates : 12th December 2011 - 15th February 2012Respondent Type : Canterbury District residentsSource : Ipsos MORI (J11-040341-01)*=Less than 0.5 %Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - z/a/b - z/c/d/e/f/g - z/h/i/j/k - z/l/m/n/o - z/p/q - z/r/s* small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing

    INTERNAL USE ONLY

    Canterbury Future Development(FINAL - General Public)

    Table 57

    Q.9.6. In principle, do you support or oppose the building of new homes in the future in the district of Canterbury as a whole if ...?It meant an increase in traffic and congestion

    Base : All

  • 7/28/2019 Canterbury Future Development Research Questionnaire Analysis Report - Public (Ipsos MORI 2012-05)

    58/323

    Children in homeType of homeHome ownershipSocial gradePlace of workLength of residenceWithindistrict

    UnwtdPrivateSocialOwnerElsewhereofMore than5 years up1 year upUp to one

    TotalNoYesMaisonetteBungalowFlatHouserenterrenteroccupierC2DEABC1ElsewhereLondonin KentCanterbury10 yearsto 10 yearsto 5 yearsyearWtd Total(s)(r)(q)(p)(o)(n)(m)(l)(k)(j)(i)(h)(g)(f)(e)(d)(c)(b)(a)(z)

    9026392631937073714910064233556719187527860511314440902Unweighted Total

    9026292731*83*76*74113599*65832857417*15*71*271591116*15342*902Weighted Total

    90257723118862656133875782935131617682445439912937806Effective Base

    391620-22315151624121-363213136Strongly support4%3%7%-3%3%4%4%15%2%7%2%7%-4%2%5%1%2%2%4%

    15811744-102112934221025210851114194173019160Tend to support18%19%16%-12%27%17%25%22%16%16%19%31%8%15%15%16%15%19%46%18%

    1128429-81392289753875218316614295113Neither support nor12%13%11%-10%16%12%20%9%11%12%13%14%5%11%11%11%12%19%12%13%oppose

    30422193-312425946302341102042429101199485314313Tend to oppose34%35%34%-37%31%35%34%30%36%34%35%9%25%40%37%34%41%34%34%35%

    2861908713117228232223010317479229319936393277Strongly oppose32%30%32%100%37%23%31%17%23%35%31%30%39%62%30%34%34%31%25