Upload
bertelsmann-foundation
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This issue focuses on US climate-change legislation.
Citation preview
Inspiring People. Shaping the Future.
WASHINGTON, DC1101 New York Avenue, NWSuite 901Washington, DC 20005 USAContact: Tyson BarkerE-mail: tyson.barker@bertelsmann-
foundation.orgTel: (+1) 202.384.1993www.bertelsmann-foundation.org
BRUSSELSRésidence PalaceRue de la Loi 1551040 Brussels, BelgiumContact: Thomas FischerE-mail: thomas.fischer@bertelsmann-
stiftung.deTel: (+32 2) 280.2830www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/brussels
©Copyright 2010, Bertelsmann Foundation. All rights reserved.
The Brussels Connection to Capitol Hill
CapitolWire
US President Barack Obama’s efforts to negotiate the Copenhagen Accord at
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) summit
last December were perceived in the US as laudable for getting the world’s
major emitters to agree that emissions reductions are necessary to mitigate
the adverse effects of climate change. But his commitment to implementing the
terms of the agreement has thus far amounted to nothing more than wishful
thinking. Sen. John McCain (Republican-Arizona) described the accord shortly after
it was announced as “a nothing burger”. He later warned against expecting much
action to back up the commitment. Sen. McCain’s political instinct was correct,
and the future appears unlikely to herald any change.
CapitolWire is a joint publication of the Bertelsmann Foundation offices in Washington, DC and Brussels. It connects the European Parliament
to Congressional policy and politics, and contributes to a common trans-Atlantic political culture. CapitolWire is an occasional publication that
highlights issues, legislation and policymakers relevant to the European Parliament’s legislative cycle. This publication looks at the Congress from
the point of view of European Parliament staffers and offers timely operational analysis.
Contact: Tyson BarkerE-mail: tyson.barker@bertelsmann- foundation.orgTel: (+1) 202.384.1993www.bertelsmann-foundation.org
Contact: Thomas FischerE-mail: thomas.fischer@bertelsmann- stiftung.deTel: (+32 2) 280.2830www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/brussels
KEY POINTS
• The EU has had an Emissions Trading System in place since 2005, while only the US House of Representatives has passed cap-and-trade legislation.
• A fractious Senate and approaching mid-term elections make it politically impossible for the US Congress to act on climate change this year.
• The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can regulate CO2 emissions through “endangerment findings”. States will also devise schemes to reduce CO2 emissions.
• The Department of Energy (DOE) is enacting energy-efficient and clean-technology programs through construction and vehicle initiatives, and alternative-energy infrastructure.
ABOUT THE BERTELSMANN FOUNDATION: The Bertelsmann Foundation is a private, nonpartisan operating foundation, working to promote and strengthen trans-Atlantic cooperation. Serving as a platform for open dialogue among key stakeholders, the Foundation develops practical policy
recommendations on issues central to successful development of both sides of the ocean.
©Copyright 2010, Bertelsmann Foundation. All rights reserved.
US Climate-Change Legislation: Up In Smoke?
AU
GU
ST
20
10
Inspiring People. Shaping the Future.
WASHINGTON, DC1101 New York Avenue, NWSuite 901Washington, DC 20005 USAContact: Tyson BarkerE-mail: tyson.barker@bertelsmann-
foundation.orgTel: (+1) 202.384.1993www.bertelsmann-foundation.org
BRUSSELSRésidence PalaceRue de la Loi 1551040 Brussels, BelgiumContact: Thomas FischerE-mail: thomas.fischer@bertelsmann-
stiftung.deTel: (+32 2) 280.2830www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/brussels
©Copyright 2010, Bertelsmann Foundation. All rights reserved.
The Brussels Connection to Capitol Hill
CapitolWireThe US Senate has yet to pass any climate-change legislation. Several proposals
(i.e., those put forward by, Sens. Kerry/Lieberman, Sen. Bingaman, Sens. Kerry/Boxer) have surfaced in the 111th (current) Congress, but none has sufficient support
for a vote. And the prospects for any Senate energy legislation are grim because
time is running out: The body is in recess for August and most of September to
allow campaigning for November’s elections. That fast-approaching election in
any case removes anything controversial from consideration.
Some Congressional Democrats and White House officials, including energy
adviser Carol Browner, have said that a post-elections energy bill is possible,
but even that would likely be a slimmed-down piece of legislation. Such a bill
could offer few clean-energy provisions (i.e., incentives
for electric vehicles and home efficiency retrofits), but
would primarily be a response to the oil spill in the Gulf
of Mexico.
With polls showing probable Democrat losses from the
mid-term elections, however, prospects for any Senate
action on climate change in the foreseeable future are
bad.
Failure in the US Senate
In lieu of Congressional action, President Obama will rely on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to act. A Supreme Court ruling in 2007 ruled that the Clean Air Act could include greenhouse gases, thereby giving the EPA discretion to
decide if CO2 emissions endanger public health. Last year, the EPA concluded
in its endangerment finding that they do. In response, Sen. Lisa Murkowski
(Republican-Alaska) this year sponsored a resolution disapproving the finding,
but the resolution failed when brought to a vote. The EPA has begun action on
curbing CO2 emissions by, for example, implementing new greenhouse-gas rules
for automobiles and large stationary sources.
How quickly the EPA will move forward and how far their measures will go,
however, remain uncertain. The agency is facing a number of “endangerment-
finding” lawsuits from some states and industry groups. Additionally, Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid (Democrat-Nevada) is rumored to have promised
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (Democrat-West Virginia), who represents a state in which
coal mining is widespread, a vote on his Stationary Source Delay Act, which would
suspend for two years EPA regulation of greenhouse gases from stationary
sources. Should this pass, Congress would have more
time to approve climate-change legislation, in which
case it would become the author of climate regulations
instead of the EPA.
The EPA Endangerment Finding
The US Department of Energy (DOE) also has some discretion to enable clean-
energy policies. Congress allocated US$16.8 billion to the Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy (EERE) division of the DOE through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (also known as the “stimulus bill”). The funds are
being used for energy-efficient projects, such as updating building technologies
and developing alternative energy sources.
In the meantime the states are forging ahead with their own plans to put a price
on carbon. Ten northeastern states have already enacted cap-and-trade schemes
for the utilities sector, and other states plan to follow suit.
For their part, Sens. John Kerry (Democrat-Massachusetts) and Joe Lieberman
(Independent-Connecticut) have reactivated the debate on a US carbon tax
by including provisions for a “border adjustment” in their American Power Act. A carbon tax could be considered in the next Congress (which convenes in
January 2011), especially since the business community wants certainty on any
carbon price. But thorough reviews and thoughtful debate will be necessary for a
carbon-tax proposal to gain traction in the Senate.
It is unclear if any of these actions will live up to
President Obama’s commitment to the Copenhagen Accord.
But without Congressional action, his pledge is likely to
go unfulfilled.*
* See World Resources Institute analysis on reducing greenhouse-gas
emissions using existing federal authorities and state action.
Other US Government Actions
p EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson testifies on Capitol Hill in response to Sen. Rockefeller’s questions about the agency’s endangerment finding.
p Sens. Kerry and Lieberman unveiled the American Power Act in May 2010, but lacked the necessary support in the Senate to bring it to a vote.
AU
GU
ST
20
10
2