Catalina Roxas, Et Al. v. Court of Appeals, Et Al. : December 1

8/18/2019 Catalina Roxas, Et Al. v. Court of Appeals, Et Al. : December 1

1/5

Tweet 0 Tweet

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1987 > December 1987 Decisions > G.R. No. L-76549 De

10, 1987 - CATALINA ROXAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.:

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | cha

Search

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

DebtKollect Company, Inc.

ChanRobles Intellectual PropertyDivision

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-76549. December 10, 1987.]

CATALINA, ENRIQUE, ROSARIO, FLORDELIZA, RIZALAIDA AND SOCORRO, all surnaROXAS as heirs of the late SEGUNDO ROXAS, Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS and A

ROXAS, Respondents.

D E C I S I O N

GANCA

Petitioners seek the review of the Resolution of the Court of appeals dated October 2, 19November 5, 1986 in CA-G.R. CV No. 08119 declaring appellants’ Brief filed by herein petitiohave been filed out of time and denying their motion for reconsideration.chanrobles.com.ph:virtuallaw library

It appears that in Civil Case No. 3837-M, Branch 132 of the Regional Trial Court of Makati r judgment dismissing plaintiff Segundo Roxas’ complaint for reconveyance of title against Andre

and others.

On October 21, 1985, petitioner filed a notice of appeal. In the Resolution of October 25, 1985, ta quo directed the ventilation of the proceedings in the Court of Appeals as the notice of appeal wwithin the reglementary period. On January 29, 1986, petitioners were notified by the respondeof Appeals to pay the docket fee and on March 7, 1986, petitioners were required to file appellanwithin forty-five (45) days from receipt thereof, copy of which was received by petitioners on Ma1986.

On April 28, 1986, petitioners filed their first motion for extension of time for thirty (30) days cfrom May 2, 1986 within which to file their brief. Said motion was granted per Resolution of1986, counted from notice thereof copy of which was received by petitioners counsel on May 14On May 29, 1987, petitioners filed a second motion for extension of time for another period o(30) days on the ground that petitioners’ counsel is suffering from asthma and hypertension atheir brief has not yet been completely finished in draft form. Per Resolution of June 6, 1986, rescourt granted the motion counted from notice thereof copy of which was received by petitioners,on June 23, 1986. Then, on July 21, 1986, two (2) days before the expiration of the 30-daygranted, petitioners filed their last motion for extension of time praying for fifteen (15) days from notice.chanrobles virtuallawlibrary

On August 25, 1986, before said motion was resolved, petitioners filed their brief. On October 2respondent Court of Appeals denied petitioners’ motion for last extension in the resolution whicas follows: jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Before Us for resolution is a ‘Motion For Last Extension to file Appellant’s Brief, filed on July 2praying for a 15-day extension from July 23, 1986 within which to file appellant’s brief.

It appears, however, that while the same remained unresolved, appellant filed his brief only on25, 1986, or 18 days beyond the period of extension prayed for by appellant. No other moextension was filed thereafter.

WHEREFORE, the appellant’s brief is hereby considered filed out of time and is ordered expungthe record.

The appeal of plaintiff is ordered DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED." 1

On October 23, 1986, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of the resolution of October 2

but it was denied per Resolution of November 5, 1986.

http://iplaw.chanrobles.com/http://iplaw.chanrobles.com/http://www.debtkollect.com/http://www.debtkollect.com/http://www.debtkollect.com/http://www.chanroblesbar.com/http://www.chanroblesbar.com/http://www.chanroblesbar.com/http://www.chanrobles.com/http://www.chanrobles.com/index1.htmhttp://www.chanrobles.com/index1.htmhttp://iplaw.chanrobles.com/http://www.debtkollect.com/http://www.chanroblesbar.com/http://www.chanrobles.com/index1.htmhttp://www.chanrobles.com/index1.htmhttp://www.chanrobles.com/http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decisions.php?id=12http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=652#http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=652#http://twitter.com/sharehttps://twitter.com/search?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1975marchdecisions.php%3Fid%3D87https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&text=G.R.%20No.%20L-40136%20March%2025%2C%201975%20-%20COSMOS%20FOUNDRY%20SHOP%20WORKERS%20UNION%2C%20ET%20AL.%20v.%20LO%20BU%2C%20ET%20AL.%20%3A%20MARCH%201975%20-%20PHILIPPINE%20SUPREME%20COURT%20JURISPRUDENCE%20-%20CHANROBLES%20VIRTUAL%20LAW%20LIBRARY%3A&tw_p=tweetbutton&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1975marchdecisions.php%3Fid%3D87%23.VfAed5xSgiA.twitter


2/5

December-1987Jurisprudence

G.R. No. L-49109 December 1, 1987 - SANTA ROSAMINING COMPANY, INC. v. JOSE J. LEIDO, JR., ET AL.

G.R. No. L-59783 December 1, 1987 - DOMINADOR R.MIRANDA v. RODOLFO A. ORTIZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-62157 December 1, 1987 - EULALIO MORA,JR. v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ETAL.

G.R. No. L-65216 December 1, 1987 - FLERIDAOVENSON v. EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATIONCOMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-65482 December 1, 1987 - JOSE RIZALCOLLEGE v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONSCOMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-68409 December 1, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THEPHIL. v. ROGER B. FERNANDO

G.R. No. L-72147 December 1, 1987 - WANGLABORATORIES, INC. v. RAFAEL T. MENDOZA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-72694 December 1, 1987 - AURORA DELBANCO, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,ET AL.

G.R. No. L-73319 December 1, 1987 - ENRIQUEANTONIO, ET AL. v. CONRADO F. ESTRELLA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-75782 December 1, 1987 - EURO-LINEA,PHILS., INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONSCOMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-75964 December 1, 1987 - DEVELOPMENTBANK OF RIZAL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-79173 December 1, 1987 - IN RE:ROLANDO N. ABADILLA, ET AL. v. FIDEL V. RAMOS, ET

Hence this petition.

It is the position of the petitioners that respondent court erred in considering their appellants’ have been filed out of time whereas it was filed before their motion for last extension of timresolved. Petitioners argue further that since their motion which prayed for fifteen days excounted from notice is in line with the previous resolutions of the respondent court, then tmotion for extension of time should not have been denied as there was no intention on their delay or prejudice the appellees. chanrobles virtuallawlibrary

Petitioners’ argument is predicated upon the theory that whenever respondent court grants theirfor extension of time it was always made to begin from receipt of notice of the resolution despprayer that it be granted counted from the date prayed for.

The argument is unmeritorious. Pursuant to Section 15, Rule 46 of the Revised Rules of C"extension of time for the filing of briefs will not be allowed except for good and sufficient cauonly if the motion for extension is filed before the expiration of the time sought to be extAllowance or denial of motions for extension of time to file briefs is addressed to the sound discrthe court. 2 There is no question that the discretion vested in the courts whether to grant or not for extensions must be exercised wisely and prudently, never capriciously, with a view of su

justice. 3

In the case before Us, it is Our considered view and We so hold that the Resolutions assailed bpetitioners are products of respondent court’s sound exercise of its discretion, considering the circumstances of this case. Reference is hereby made that from the time of the rendition of the appealed from dated July 19, 1985, up to the time of filing of the appellants’ brief on August 25, period of 402 days lapsed or counted from March 18, 1986, the date of petitioners’ receipt orequiring them to file their brief up to the time of filing 160 days lapsed. Examining the brief herein petitioners it appears however that it consists of twenty-six (26) pages only with simple nof facts and discussions of the issues. 4 Any practicing lawyer knows that twenty (20) days is msufficient to complete the printing of brief of such length including its proof-reading. 5 It isamong every practicing lawyer that the policy of the Court of Appeals is to limit the second extetime to file briefs to twenty (20) days. Said policy was relaxed further by the respondent Court bsixty (60) days extension on the basis of the plea of petitioners’ counsel that he was sufferiasthma even if said plea appears to be self-serving as it was not even accompanied by a certificate. Petitioners abused the laxity extended them by the respondent Court. They even praythe extension of fifteen (15) days be counted from notice. Lawyers should not presume that thwould grant their motion for extension more so to expect that if ever granted it would alwcounted from notice thereof.

Thus, the petition to review the assailed resolutions must fail: Let this serve as warning members of the Philippine bar who take their own sweet time with their cases if not purposely progress for no cogent reason. It does no credit to their standing in the profession. More so whdo not file the required brief or pleading until their motion is acted upon. Not only should tpresume that their motion for extension of time will be granted by the court much less shouexpect that the extension that may be granted shall be counted from notice. They should file theor pleadings within the extended period requested. Failing in this, they have only themselves to their appeal or case is dismissed.cralawnad

WHEREFORE, premises considered the petition is hereby DENIED for lack of merit.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (C.J.), Narvasa, Cruz and Paras, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:

1. Page 22. Rollo.

2. De Guzman v. Cuevas, Sr., 114 SCRA 650.

3. San Juan v. Court of Appeals, 89 SCRA 191, 196.

4. Pages 53-79, Rollo.

5. Razalan v. Concepcion, 31 SCRA 611, 613.

Back to Home | Back to Main

QUICK SEARCH

1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908

1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916

1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924

1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932

1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940

1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948

1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956

1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964

1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972

1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 19801981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988

Ads by Google ! GR ! GR GR L ! Court Cases ! Court Rules

Ads by Google ! Court Cases ! Court Rules ! Catalina ! Brief Case

Ads by Google ! Catalina ! Brief Case ! Law Cases ! Law Appeal

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981502&bpp=3&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285%2C4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=6&xpc=Z6OD2T8zhd&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=11&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Catalina&kw1=Brief+Case&kw2=Law+Cases&kw3=Law+Appeal&okw=Law+Appeal&rt=ChBV8B8uAAF7NApojgfDD-0oEgpMYXcgQXBwZWFsGghEV5Skep75jigBMANSEwjfqYy-8-nHAhXTD2gKHbnDANEhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981502&bpp=3&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285%2C4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=6&xpc=Z6OD2T8zhd&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=11&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Catalina&kw1=Brief+Case&kw2=Law+Cases&kw3=Law+Appeal&okw=Law+Cases&rt=ChBV8B8uAAF7MgpojgfDD-0oEglMYXcgQ2FzZXMaCPgiUELc1VjZKAEwA1ITCN-pjL7z6ccCFdMPaAoducMA0Qhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981502&bpp=3&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285%2C4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=6&xpc=Z6OD2T8zhd&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=11&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Catalina&kw1=Brief+Case&kw2=Law+Cases&kw3=Law+Appeal&okw=Brief+Case&rt=ChBV8B8uAAF7MApojgfDD-0oEgpCcmllZiBDYXNlGggjyh1TE2lMHygBMANSEwjfqYy-8-nHAhXTD2gKHbnDANEhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981502&bpp=3&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285%2C4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=6&xpc=Z6OD2T8zhd&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=11&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Catalina&kw1=Brief+Case&kw2=Law+Cases&kw3=Law+Appeal&okw=Catalina&rt=ChBV8B8uAAF7GwpojgfDD-0oEghDYXRhbGluYRoIfH7QTF61WLsoATADUhMI36mMvvPpxwIV0w9oCh25wwDRhttps://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/request.py?contact=abg_afc&url=http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&hl=en&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&ai0=https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981490&bpp=2&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=5&xpc=sXNJfk1wKR&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=10&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Court+Cases&kw1=Court+Rules&kw2=Catalina&kw3=Brief+Case&okw=Brief+Case&rt=ChBV8B8uAADMSApoFI3eAvZGEgpCcmllZiBDYXNlGgjq54uHhjGKDygBMAJSEwiLlIq-8-nHAhUVEmgKHRB4DqYhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981490&bpp=2&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=5&xpc=sXNJfk1wKR&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=10&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Court+Cases&kw1=Court+Rules&kw2=Catalina&kw3=Brief+Case&okw=Catalina&rt=ChBV8B8uAADMRgpoFI3eAvZGEghDYXRhbGluYRoI80gzX2dFI8IoATACUhMIi5SKvvPpxwIVFRJoCh0QeA6mhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981490&bpp=2&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=5&xpc=sXNJfk1wKR&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=10&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Court+Cases&kw1=Court+Rules&kw2=Catalina&kw3=Brief+Case&okw=Court+Rules&rt=ChBV8B8uAADMRApoFI3eAvZGEgtDb3VydCBSdWxlcxoIJC-KOUAf6JwoATACUhMIi5SKvvPpxwIVFRJoCh0QeA6mhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981490&bpp=2&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&prev_slotnames=4860573285&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=5&xpc=sXNJfk1wKR&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=10&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=Court+Cases&kw1=Court+Rules&kw2=Catalina&kw3=Brief+Case&okw=Court+Cases&rt=ChBV8B8uAADMOApoFI3eAvZGEgtDb3VydCBDYXNlcxoIqDmpY5tgGHkoATACUhMIi5SKvvPpxwIVFRJoCh0QeA6mhttps://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/request.py?contact=abg_afc&url=http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&hl=en&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&ai0=https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981458&bpp=9&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=4&xpc=bHt7ZxxRTD&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=29&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=GR&kw1=GR+GR+L&kw2=Court+Cases&kw3=Court+Rules&okw=Court+Rules&rt=ChBV8B8uAAoXcApoE0WmCUhKEgtDb3VydCBSdWxlcxoI2Y-IpNSy8_8oAVITCOLpsr7z6ccCFUGJaAod6CULjQhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981458&bpp=9&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=4&xpc=bHt7ZxxRTD&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=29&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=GR&kw1=GR+GR+L&kw2=Court+Cases&kw3=Court+Rules&okw=Court+Cases&rt=ChBV8B8uAAoXbQpoE0WmCUhKEgtDb3VydCBDYXNlcxoIbVUlv-n1X9goAVITCOLpsr7z6ccCFUGJaAod6CULjQhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981458&bpp=9&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=4&xpc=bHt7ZxxRTD&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=29&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=GR&kw1=GR+GR+L&kw2=Court+Cases&kw3=Court+Rules&okw=GR+GR+L&rt=ChBV8B8uAAoXagpoE0WmCUhKEgdHUiBHUiBMGgh0Jc7PBAiedCgBUhMI4umyvvPpxwIVQYloCh3oJQuNhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&output=html&h=15&slotname=4860573285&adk=3595057627&w=468&lmt=1441771181&loeid=108809083&flash=18.0.0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chanrobles.com%2Fcralaw%2F1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&wgl=1&dt=1441799981458&bpp=9&shv=r20150901&cbv=r20150820&saldr=aa&prev_fmts=468x15_0ads_al&correlator=7880756006913&frm=20&ga_vid=*&ga_sid=*&ga_hid=*&ga_fc=1&pv=1&u_tz=480&u_his=12&u_java=1&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=725&u_aw=1280&u_cd=24&u_nplug=8&u_nmime=48&dff=verdana&dfs=11&biw=1076&bih=565&eid=575144605%2C317150304&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.ph%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=24&brdim=90%2C22%2C90%2C22%2C1280%2C22%2C1076%2C659%2C1076%2C565&vis=1&rsz=d%7C%7C%7Cn&abl=XS&ppjl=t&pfx=0&fu=16&bc=1&ifi=4&xpc=bHt7ZxxRTD&p=http%3A//www.chanrobles.com&dtd=29&rl_rc=true&adsense_enabled=true&ad_type=text&ui=rc:0&oe=utf8&height=15&width=468&format=fpkc_al_lp&kw_type=radlink&hl=en&kw0=GR&kw1=GR+GR+L&kw2=Court+Cases&kw3=Court+Rules&okw=GR&rt=ChBV8B8uAAoXYApoE0WmCUhKEgJHUhoIqTq39XfdSbUoAVITCOLpsr7z6ccCFUGJaAod6CULjQhttps://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/request.py?contact=abg_afc&url=http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php%3Fid%3D652&hl=en&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&ai0=https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=CNf36LR_wVfyxLsqPogO2rZyADNLk_qAHqveHlLECwI23ARABIJ-m5BFg4bS6hZAayAEDqQIY78arncoMPqgDAcgDwQSqBJ8BT9DEh77Q4RXO2w1IpBPWiXzKR6RPZEzdj4tzPQzoX2tn272zED_0nC9sfCEmL39oJwB9g-DoM-Uodx8JgLNh75x0V2A1S8sUxpFJ5wmD_K1VV5flfEpD6jm1dsB589t0ulcMTnIvEzqsQS_nn0ffCbKvN8-LxlFASSNPzdBFYrIdNqkeS6wsnE9K6AkOiArcRob1xomMKdxoTqEVfGNzoAYDgAfSu9M1qAemvhvYBwE&num=1&sig=AOD64_3N_ezBZfMmJjW1hqtgwYwG10VYqg&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&adurl=http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/ifa2015/http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1988.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1986.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1985.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1984.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1983.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1982.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1981.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1980.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1979.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1978.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1977.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1976.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1975.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1974.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1973.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1972.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1971.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1970.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1969.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1968.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1967.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1966.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1965.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1964.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1963.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1962.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1961.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1960.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1959.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1958.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1957.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1956.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1955.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1954.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1953.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1952.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1951.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1950.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1949.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1948.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1947.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1946.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1945.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1944.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1943.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1942.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1941.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1940.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1939.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1938.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1937.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1936.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1935.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1934.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1933.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1932.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1931.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1930.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1929.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1928.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1927.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1926.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1925.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1924.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1923.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1922.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1921.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1920.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1919.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1918.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1917.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1916.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1915.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1914.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1913.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1912.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1911.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1910.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1909.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1908.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1907.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1906.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1905.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1904.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1903.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1902.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1901.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=635http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=634http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=633http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=632http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=631http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=630http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=629http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=628http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=627http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=626http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=625http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/index.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/index.phphttp://iplaw.chanrobles.com/


3/5

AL.

G.R. No. L-40107 December 2, 1987 - GERVACIO D.VERCELES v. ANGEL P. BACANI, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-44339 December 2, 1987 - CRISANTA F.SENO, ET AL. v. MARCOS MANGUBAT, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-60559 December 2, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THEPHIL. v. BENJAMIN M. PUZON

G.R. No. 78621 December 2, 1987 - SAMAHANGMANGGAGAWA NG LIBERTY COMMERCIAL CENTER v.OSCAR B. PIMENTEL, ET AL.

A.C. No. 1450 December 2, 1987 - EUGENIO MAGO v.ELISEO BOTE

A.C. No. 3072 December 2, 1987 - TOMAS BATNAG v.OCTAVIO M. BANTA

G.R. No. L-42965 December 3, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THEPHIL. v. MANUEL GUARDO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-45268 December 3, 1987 - ISIDOROLIMQUIACO, JR. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-58897 December 3, 1987 - LUZONSTEVEDORING CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS,ET AL.

G.R. No. L-73698 December 3, 1987 - JUAN P.PUERTOLLANO, ET AL. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATECOURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-74100 December 3, 1987 - PEOPLE OF THEPHIL. v. GENTEM KINTUAN

G.R. No. L-47669 December 7, 1987 - MARINA D.NARTATES v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCESYSTEM, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-79484 December 7, 1987 - KANT KWONG,ET AL. v. PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOODGOVERNMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-57387 December 10, 1987 - UNIVERSITYOF THE EAST v. UNIVERSITY OF THE EAST FACULTYASSOCIATION, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. L-67721-22 December 10, 1987 - PEOPLEOF THE PHIL. v. AVELINO ATENCIO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-76549 December 10, 1987 - CATALINAROXAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-79244 December 10, 1987 - IN RE: MATEOAYLLON SR. v. PRIMA A. SEVILLA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-46969 December 11, 1987 - BONIFACIA U.PACARRO v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-47414 December 11, 1987 - ELIODORO T.ISCALA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. L-60150 December 11, 1987 - ROGELIO R.CASTILLO v. NAPOLCOM ADJUDICATION BOARD, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. L-66003-04 December 11, 1987 - PEOPLEOF THE PHIL. v. HERBERTO A. MANZANILLA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-75347 December 11, 1987 - FORD PHIL.SALARIED EMPLOYEES ASSOC., ET AL. v. NATIONALLABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-75837 December 11, 1987 - DOMINADOR BASAYA, JR., ET AL. v. FRANCIS MILITANTE, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-77760 December 11, 1987 - VIOLETA S.VENTURANZA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-77801 December 11, 1987 - RAFAEL A.REYES v. JAIME N. FERRER, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-78015 December 11, 1987 - MALAYSIANAIRLINE SYSTEM BERNAD v. COURT OF APPEALS, ETAL.

G.R. No. L-78911-25 December 11, 1987 - CHARMINAB. BANAL v. TOMAS V. TADEO, JR., ET AL.

G.R. No. L-29330 December 14, 1987 - FILOMENAARROYO VDA. DE BUNCIO, ET AL. v. ESTATE OF ANITADE LEON, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-40234 December 14, 1987 - MARIMPERIOCOMPAÑIA NAVIERA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-46058 December 14, 1987 - SOCIALSECURITY SYSTEM v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-48926 December 14, 1987 - MANUELSOSITO v. AGUINALDO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

G.R. No. L-53542 December 14, 1987 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. BERNABE CIRILO, JR.

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2013 2014 2015

Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2014.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2013.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2012.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2011.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2010.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2009.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2008.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2007.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2006.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2005.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2004.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2003.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2002.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2001.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2000.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1999.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1998.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1997.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1996.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1995.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1994.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1993.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1992.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1991.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1990.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1989.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=668http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=667http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=666http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=665http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=664http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=663http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=662http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=661http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=660http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=659http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=658http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=657http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=656http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=655http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=654http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=653http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=652http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=651http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=650http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=649http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=648http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=647http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=646http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=645http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=644http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=643http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=642http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=641http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=640http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=639http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=638http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=637http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=636


4/5

G.R. No. L-62441 December 14, 1987 - BANK OF THEPHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. BENJAMIN PINEDA

G.R. No. L-70308 December 14, 1987 - PEOPLE OFTHE PHIL. v. ANTONIO S. SONICO

G.R. No. L-72644 December 14, 1987 - ALFREDO F.PRIMERO v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-73326 December 14, 1987 - PEOPLE OFTHE PHIL. v. ELEANOR DEJUCOS

G.R. No. L-74218 December 14, 1987 - MANUELA S.CATAN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,ET AL.

G.R. No. L-74228 December 14, 1987 - FEDERATIONOF DEMOCRATIC TRADE UNIONS, ET AL. v.PAMBANSANG KILUSAN NG PAGGAWA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-75294 December 14, 1987 - PEOPLE OFTHE PHIL. v. ROGELIO PARTULAN

G.R. Nos. L-75746-48 December 14, 1987 -ORESHOOT MINING COMPANY v. DIOSCORA C.ARELLANO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-76787 December 14, 1987 - BAYLENCORPORATION, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-78382 December 14, 1987 - BROADWAYMOTORS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONSCOMMISSION, ET AL.

UDK No. 7927 December 14, 1987 - LOUIE L. VARGASv. AKAI PHILIPPINES, INC.

G.R. No. L-29059 December 15, 1987 -COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CEBUPORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-55074 December 17, 1987 -PURIFICACION M. MACLAN, ET AL. v. MARIO L.SANTOS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-79974 December 17, 1987 - ULPIANO P.SARMIENTO III, ET AL. v. SALVADOR MISON, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. L-80519-21 December 17, 1987 - JUNIEEVANGELISTA CUA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ETAL.

G.R. No. L-33182 December 18, 1987 - PEDRO A.FELICEN, SR. v. SEVERINO ORIAS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-41459 December 18, 1987 - NATIONALLABOR UNION v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-45898 December 18, 1987 - EUFRACIAMENDOZA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-46401 December 18, 1987 - PETRA VDA.DE CARCALLAS, ET AL. v. VALERIANO YANCHA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-52393 December 18, 1987 - ABELARDOIBARRA, ET AL. v. FAUSTINO IBARRA, SR., ET AL.

G.R. No. L-57424 December 18, 1987 - ROBIDANTE L.KABILING, ET AL. v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY,ET AL.

G.R. No. L-58870 December 18, 1987 - CEBUINSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. BLAS OPLE, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-70203 December 18, 1987 - SALVIO B.FORTUNO, ET AL. v. MERICIA B. PALMA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-46935 December 21, 1987 - GREGORIO DEGUZMAN, JR., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-48656 December 21, 1987 - PEOPLE OFTHE PHIL. v. NORMAN AMPARADO

G.R. No. L-49250 December 21, 1987 - CRESENCIAALMARZA v. ASUNCION ARGUELLES, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-73918 December 21, 1987 - TONGBROTHERS CO. v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,ET AL.

G.R. No. L-74191 December 21, 1987 - INSULAR LIFEASSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-74766 December 21, 1987 - DOMINGOVERGARA, SR. v. JOSE T. SUELTO, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-76710 December 21, 1987 - ANTONIOONG, SR. v. HENRY M. PAREL, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-62955 December 22, 1987 - VIRGILIOOZOA v. CARIDAD VDA. DE MADULA, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-70608 December 22, 1987 - ALLIEDBANKING CORPORATION v. RICARDO C. CASTRO, ET

AL.

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=700http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=699http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=698http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=697http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=696http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=695http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=694http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=693http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=692http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=691http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=690http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=689http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=688http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=687http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=686http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=685http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=684http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=683http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=682http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=681http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=680http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=679http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=678http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=677http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=676http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=675http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=674http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=673http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=672http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=671http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=670http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=669


5/5

G.R. No. L-33628 December 29, 1987 - BIENVENIDOA. EBARLE, ET AL. v. MELQUIADES B. SUCALDITO, ETAL.

G.R. No. L-54580 December 29, 1987 - ARMCO STEELCORPORATION v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. L-55312 December 29, 1987 - MANUEL L.FERNANDEZ v. GROLIER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

G.R. No. L-77008 December 29, 1987 - ANGELITALOPEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

A.C. No. 922 December 29, 1987 - IN RE: SANTIAGOF. MARCOS

pyright © 1998 - 20151998 - 2015 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles
http://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/aclk?sa=L&ai=Cl607LR_wVdfENoWRogPn8Z7wCbDY_5MImK7q_psCqpO-m0cQASCfpuQRYOG0uoWQGqAB-rD19APIAQKoAwHIA8EEqgSnAU_QRh_dlCSfu7WFdLn69NaIkzKilb5iiLJYoP_Mrp4EOoT8Xa45FuqilJB4rUzOonxXCyLvqoCEkXaa6Bx95MGO3R6dY1U_5veGtkuaNwsc4zrFERGJqVV2ct0p8KI7fL8r3Uli4aH7H-fFlRvMKyNlYB4hqqEYa6ehXxa99H9nEihYBol2is_hMZxps2wUawvlhITcHd3TcBG7q2prnfGzvUqxIwrZiAYBoAYCgAfuzooLqAemvhvYBwE&num=1&cid=5Gh21AXihSoWH2_UvJ-4d4SJ&sig=AOD64_2yqC80lS6QRyolLr2k5nxtS2jhGg&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&adurl=http://www.xforex.com/ForexTradingTL%3Ftlid%3D120177%26src%3DAdWords%26campaign%3DAdGroupName%26ad%3D76416243016%26SiteTarget%3Dwww.chanrobles.comhttp://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/aclk?sa=L&ai=C9HmILR_wVfi_NMGSogPoy6zoCOX9xNgG3ZDi9KICwI23ARABIJ-m5BFg4bS6hZAaoAG7i6HjA8gBAqgDAcgDwQSqBKQBT9Ci2msTc6Eih1OynnWpPv4ABSG3FgE0Jn_MpudMMILoACyR6MT1ZtyAzk4A_JZT-Yz97IYjn1t0nDPOoiNNRBhEuTsslUv4CfOmLoGAsc66Vp2eGbQK9_Nll6HZ3ryl0GXn9zoKSiWdb0zKKdEXouc899Gh4jv6NJuSiIL04AuYoLMuvSc4tS7tD9PlmiHLxqnCIO6wP8I9DUVB_kaZ2Pnu_-6IBgGgBgKAB6303hyoB6a-G9gHAQ&num=1&cid=5Ggoy10Ebi6oznQ4J2CGpu4K&sig=AOD64_0JjMjzSgMaxD8tG_3UIZZvlqSOhg&client=ca-pub-0513148074404120&adurl=http://download.fromdoctopdf.com/index.jhtml%3Fpartner%3DY6xdm877http://www.chanrobles.com/emailrestriction.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/disclaimer.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/copyrightnotice.phphttp://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=705http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=704http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=703http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=702http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1987decemberdecisions.php?id=701

Documents

Catalina Roxas, Et Al. v. Court of Appeals, Et Al. : December 1