Upload
lynne-harper
View
225
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cédric LorcéSLAC & IFPA Liège
How to define and access quark and gluon contributions to the
proton spin
December 2, 2014, IIT Bombay, Bombay, India
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FRONTIERS OF QCD IIT BOMBAY DECEMBER 2-5, 2014
Angular momentum decomposition
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
SgLg
Lq
Sq
Jg
Lq
Many questions/issues : • Frame dependence ?• Gauge invariance ?• Uniqueness ?• Measurability ?• … Reviews:
Dark spin
Quark spin?
~ 30 %
?
?
?
[Leader, C.L. (2014)][Wakamatsu (2014)]
~ 20 %
[de Florian et al. (2014)]
In short …
Noether’s theorem :
Continuous symmetry
Translation invarianceRotation invariance
Conserved quantity
Total (linear) momentumTotal angular momentum
We all agree on the total quantities
BUT …
We disagree on their decomposition
In short …
3 viewpoints :
• Meaningless, unphysical discussions
No unique definition ill-defined problem
• There is a unique «physical» decomposition
Missing fundamental principle in standard approach
• Matter of convention and convenience
Measured quantities are unique BUT physical interpretation is not unique
Spin decompositions in a nutshell
[Jaffe, Manohar (1990)]
[Ji (1997)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
Lq
Jg
Canonical Kinetic
Gauge non-invariant ! « Incomplete »
Gluon spin
Gluon helicity distribution
[de Florian et al. (2014)]
« Measurable », gauge invariant but complicated
Gluon spin
[Jaffe-Manohar (1990)]
Light-front gauge
Gluon helicity distribution
Simple fixed-gauge interpretation
« Measurable », gauge invariant but complicated
Chen et al. approach
Gauge transformation (assumed)
Field strength
Pure-gauge covariant derivatives
[Chen et al. (2008,2009)] [Wakamatsu (2010,2011)]
Spin decompositions in a nutshell
[Jaffe, Manohar (1990)]
[Ji (1997)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
Lq
Jg
Canonical Kinetic
Gauge non-invariant ! « Incomplete »
Spin decompositions in a nutshell
[Chen et al. (2008)] [Wakamatsu (2010)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
Lq
Lg
Canonical Kinetic
Sg
Gauge-invariant extension (GIE)
Spin decompositions in a nutshell
[Chen et al. (2008)] [Wakamatsu (2010)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
Lq
Canonical Kinetic
Sg
Gauge-invariant extension (GIE)
Lg
[Wakamatsu (2010)][Chen et al. (2008)]
Stueckelberg symmetry
Ambiguous !
[Stoilov (2010)][C.L. (2013)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
SgLg
Lq
Coulomb GIE
[Hatta (2011)][C.L. (2013)]
Sq
SgLg
Lq
Light-front GIE
Lpot
LpotSq
Sg
Lg
Lq
Infinitely many possibilities !
Stueckelberg symmetry
Geometrical interpretation Fixed reference point
Non-local !
[Hatta (2012)][C.L. (2013)]
Gluon spin
[Jaffe-Manohar (1990)]
Light-front gauge
Gluon helicity distribution
Local fixed-gauge interpretation
« Measurable », gauge invariant but non-local
Gluon spin
[Jaffe-Manohar (1990)] [Hatta (2011)]
Light-front GIE Light-front gauge
Gluon helicity distribution
Local fixed-gauge interpretation
Non-local gauge-invariant interpretation
« Measurable », gauge invariant but non-local
Asymmetries in QCD
Example : SIDIS
[Mulders, Tangermann (1996)][Boer, Mulders (1998)]
[Bacchetta et al. (2004)][Bacchetta et al. (2007)][Anselmino et al. (2011)]
Angular modulations of the cross section are sensitive to AM
Parton distribution zoo
[C.L., Pasquini, Vanderhaeghen (2011)]
GTMDs
TMDs
FFsPDFs
Charges
GPDs
«P
hysic
al»
ob
jects
Th
eore
tical
tools
LFWFs
Parton distribution zoo
2+1D
2+0D
0+3D
0+1D
2+3D
[C.L., Pasquini, Vanderhaeghen (2011)]
GTMDs
TMDs
FFsPDFs
Charges
GPDs
«P
hysic
al»
ob
jects
Th
eore
tical
tools
Phase-space (Wigner) distribution
Parton correlators
Gauge invariant but path dependent
2+3D
Longitudinal momentum
Transverse momentum
Transverse position
[Ji (2003)][Belitsky, Ji, Yuan (2004)]
[C.L., Pasquini (2011)]
Phase-space «density»
[C.L., Pasquini (2011)][C.L. et al. (2012)]
[Hatta (2012)]
Example : canonical OAM
« Vorticity »
Spatial distribution of average transverse momentum
Kinetic vs canonical OAM
Quark naive canonical OAM (Jaffe-Manohar)
Model-dependent !
Kinetic OAM (Ji)
but
No gluons and not QCD EOM !
Pure twist-3
Canonical OAM (Jaffe-Manohar) [C.L., Pasquini (2011)][C.L. et al. (2012)]
[Kanazawa et al. (2014)][Mukherjee et al. (2014)]
[Ji (1997)]
[Penttinen et al. (2000)]
[Burkardt (2007)][Efremov et al. (2008,2010)]
[She, Zhu, Ma (2009)][Avakian et al. (2010)][C.L., Pasquini (2011)]
Summary
• We all agree on total angular momentum• but we disagree on its decomposition (matter of convention ?)
• Observables are gauge invariant but physical interpretation need not
• Information about AM is encoded in• polarized parton distributions
Reviews: [Leader, C.L. (2014)][Wakamatsu (2014)]
Semantic ambiguity
PathStueckelbergBackground
Observables
Quasi-observables
« measurable »
Quid ?
« physical »
« gauge invariant »
Measurable, physical, gauge invariant and local
« Measurable », « physical », gauge invariant and non-local
Expansion scheme
E.g. cross-sections
E.g. parton distributions
-dependent
E.g. collinear factorization
Gauge fixing
GIE1
GIE2
« Natural » gauges
Lorentz-invariant extensions~
Rest
Center-of-mass
Infinite momentum
« Natural » frames
Stueckelberg symmetry
Gauge non-invariant operator
Stueckelberg fixing
[C.L. (2013)]
Canonical Kinetic
Observability
Sq
SgLg
Lq
Sq
SgLg
Lq Sq
SgLg
Lq
Sq
Jg
Lq
Not observableObservable Quasi-observable
[Wakamatsu (2010)]
[Ji (1997)][Jaffe-Manohar (1990)]
[Chen et al. (2008)]
Two different approaches
Lagrangian Hamiltonian
Time
Space
Lorentz covariance
Physical interpretatio
n
Manifest Not manifest
Complicated Simple
Two different approaches
Stueckelberg invariant
Stueckelberg fixed
Physical dofs
Gauge dof
Gauge invariance
Physical interpretatio
n
Local Non-local
Complicated Simple
Stueckelberg symmetry
Non-local color phase factor
Path dependence Stueckelberg non-invariance
Path-dependent
Path-independent
[C.L. (2013)]
Photon spin and OAM
Should we be happy with ?
Well… for a circularly polarized plane wave travelling along z
Two descriptions related by a non-zero surface term
!
Photon spin and OAM
Should we be happy with ?
[O’Neil et al. (2002)][Garcés-Chavéz et al. (2003)]
Optically trapped microscopic particle
Back to basics
Gauge theory
Gauge invariant
Gauge non-invariant
[…] in QCD we should make clear what a quark or gluon parton is in an interacting theory. The subtlety here is in the issue of gauge invariance: a pure quark field in one gauge is a superposition of quarks and gluons in another. Different ways of gluon field gauge fixing predetermine different decompositions of the coupled quark-gluon fields into quark and gluon degrees of freedom.
[Bashinsky, Jaffe (1998)]
A choice of gauge is a choice of basis
Back to basics
• Time dependence and interaction• Forms of dynamics• Scale and scheme dependence• Should Lorentz invariance be manifest ?• Quantum gauge transformation• Surface terms• Evolution equation• How are different GIEs related ?• Should the energy-momentum tensor be symmetric ?• Topological effects ?• Longitudinal vs transverse• …
As promised, it is pretty complicated …
Additional issues
Canonical formalism
Dynamical variables
Lagrangian
[C.L. (2013)]
Starting point
Energy-momentum
Gauge invariant !
Generalized angular
momentum
Conserved tensors
Gauge covariant
Translation invariance
Lorentz invariance
Canonical formalism
Dynamical variables
Lagrangian
Starting point
Energy-momentum
Gauge invariant !
Generalized angular
momentum
Conserved tensors
Gauge invariant
Translation invariance
Lorentz invariance
Dirac variables
Dressing field
[Dirac (1955)][Mandelstam (1962)]
[Chen (2012)][C.L. (2013)]
FSIISI
SIDISDrell-Yan
OAM and path dependence[Ji, Xiong, Yuan (2012)]
[Hatta (2012)][C.L. (2013)]
Coincides locally with kinetic quark OAM
Naive T-even
x-based Fock-SchwingerLight-front
LqLq
Quark generalized OAM operator
Back to basics
Special relativity
Different foliations of space-time
Instant-form dynamics Light-front form dynamics
[Dirac (1949)]
«Space» = 3D
hypersurface
«Time» = hypersurface
label
Light-front components
Time
Space
Energy
Momentum
Passive Active
« Physical »
« Background »
Active x (Passive)-1
Stueckelberg
Stueckelberg symmetry
Quantum Electrodynamics
Phase in internal space
Light-front wave functions (LFWFs)
Fock expansion of the nucleon state
Probability associated with the Fock states
Momentum and angular momentum conservation
gauge
[C.L., Pasquini, Vanderhaeghen (2011)]
~
Overlap representation
Light-front wave functions (LFWFs)
GTMDs
Momentum Polarization