View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cell-cycle control Chapter 7 of Aguda & Friedman
Amanda GalanteCancer Dynamics RITSeptember 25, 2009
Cell-cycle checkpoints
• Restriction point– Regulate initiation of
DNA replication
• G2-M checkpoint– Checks DNA damage
• Spindle checkpoint– Checks chromosome
alignment
Restriction Point
• ‘Commitment point’ for DNA replication• R point – time after which cell will enter S
phase, even in absence of growth factors• Many cancers involve malfunctions of this
checkpoint
G2 DNA Damage Checkpoint (G2DDC)
• Need to understand how coupled PD (phosphorylation-dephosphorylation) cycles work
• Need to establish bistability
PD cycle simple example
tot
rf
Eyx
yfyxvyxvdt
dy
where
)(),(),(
and :Ex
tic.autocataly isreaction one if truebe willThis
0 i.e.
.0 need unstable, be tos.s. For the
.0)( state,steady At
ykvxykv
y
v
x
v
x
v
y
v
dy
df
dy
df
yf
rrff
rfrf
f
rtot
f
rtot
f
r
tot
rf
rrff
k
kE
k
kEy
k
kx
Exy
ykxykyf
ykvxykv
if
s.s. twohaveOnly
,
,0
:statesSteady
)(
,
Transcritical Bifurcation Point
Two PD cycles
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
22122
1111
2
1
21
0
)(),(
)()(),(
dy
dv
x
v
y
vdy
dv
dx
dv
Df
yvyxv
yvxv
dt
dydt
dy
yyf
rff
rf
rf
rf
Note that the eigenvalues of the Jacobian are both negative, implying a stable s.s.
Could be unstable if
That is, we need a destabilizing feedback loop.
0
1
11 y
vv rf
Results of G2DDC model
• Made up rate parameters (not experimentally available)
• Was able to show transcritical bistability as
25
x
Cdctotal
MPFtotalp
• Note that MPF and Cdc25 become active at same time – ‘hallmark of transcritical bifurcation in positively coupled cyclic reactions’
PD cycle conclusions
• Established existence of transcritical bifurcation point for two coupled PD cycles– Allows system to ‘check whether all components
are ready for the next cell cycle event’• MPF, Cdc25, Wee1 coupled PD cycles can be
shown to generate bistability when including other reactions
• Also applicable to R point for cyclin E/CDK2 and Cdc25a
Model Assumptions
• Final kinetochore attachment• Cell-cycle progression triggered by a protein c*
• c diffuses throughout nucleus• ρ = kinetochore radius (0.01 µm)• R = nucleus radius (1 µm)• D = diffusivity of c (1 µm2/s)
Model Objectives1.After final kinetochore attachment, a protein c
which was previously in an inhibited state c* , becomes sufficiently activated at time Tb < 3 minutes
2.At steady state, c is predominantly in an inhibited state (want at least 90% inhibited, or Ac<0.1). In this way, the system resets itself.
Summary:Tb = 1.5 min – good!A = 0.4 (i.e. 40% of c molecules are inhibited)-- too high
Direct Inhibition Model
Conclusions of Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Model
• Single unattached kinetochore activating protein is a matter of speculation
• Illustrates the impact of temporal & spatial constraints
• Were able to develop a model which met the objectives – ‘Emitted Inhibition Model’
ReferencesAguda, BD & A Friedman. Models of Cellular Regulation. Oxford
University Press, 2008.Aguda, BD. (1999) ‘Instabilities in phosphorylation-dephosphorylation
cascades and cell cycle checkpoints,’ Oncogene 18, 2846-2851.Aguda, BD. (1999) ‘A quantitative analysis of the kinetics of the G2
DNA damage checkpoint system,’ PNAS 96, 11352-11357. Doncic, A, Ben-Jacob, E and N Barkai. (2006) ‘Evaluating putative
mechanisms of the mitotic spindle checkpoint,’ PNAS 102, 6332-6337.
Other picture references• Wikipedia• http://www.mun.ca/biology/desmid/brian/BIOL2060/BIOL2060-19
/CB19.html