Chadi Whiplash

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    1/19

    Whiplash Injuries: Finite ElementStudy

    Orthopeadic Chief Resident at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and the RothInstitute Administrative and Academic Chief Resi2010-2011

    Interest : Spine Surgery Medical Illustrations Medical education Medical Leadership Emergent Leader Physician

    Enjoys Arts, Music, Martial Arts, Travel,Social Networking Contact: [email protected]

    Chadi Tannoury, MD

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    2/19

    Clinical and Finite Element Analysis of Acute Whiplash

    Chadi Tannoury, M.D. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

    & The Rothman InstituteS.P.I.N.E. Meeting Lebanon June 2010

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    3/19

    Acknowledgment

    Alexander Vaccaro, MD* Jeffrey Rihn, MDFraser Henderson, MD*

    William Wilson, BA*

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    4/19

    Disclosure

    *Disclosure of Fina ncia l Interest The authors William A. Wilson, IV., Fraser C.Henderson, Sr., and Alexander R. Vaccaro hold anequity ownership interest in ComputationalBiodynamics, LLC., and are entitled to royalty

    payments from the Spinal Cord Stress Injury Analysis(SCOSIA ) upon commercialization. Research relatedto potential Computational Biodynamics, LLC.

    products, including early-stage research essential to thedevelopment of these products, has been conducted byindividuals who hold a financial stake in the successfuloutcome of that research .

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    5/19

    Whiplash

    Acceleration Deceleration InjuriesMVA, Sports, Falls, etc..Symptoms: Range from mild neck painNeurologic sequelaeClassification:Spitze r Spin e 95

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    6/19

    Whiplash Classification:

    WAD I: Neck Pain No Physical findings WADII: Neck Pain + TTP on P/E WADIII: Presence of Neurologic Signs & Sx WADIV: Injuries a/w Frx-Dislocations

    Spitzer Spine 95

    More severe injuries Worse OutcomeSterner J Sp ina l Disd Tech 03, Berglund Pa in

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    7/19

    Conclusion

    Whiplash Associated Disorders I/II and WADIII are distinct entities

    Patho-anatomy:

    MSK injuries WAD I/IICord stretching injuries WAD III

    Prognosis WADI/II: Chronic neck pain WADIII: Neurologic Sx are mostly recoverable

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    8/19

    Materials

    March 2006 December 200731 Pts w Neck Pain s/p MVA-Falls-Sports inj.21 Pts WADI/II vs 10 Pts WADIII

    All Subjects:H&P (T0, T3, T6, T12 mo)Xrays, CT , MRI C-spine (T0, T12mo)Clinical Outcome Measures (T0, T3, T6, T12 mo)Litigaiton Claims (T12 mo)

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    9/19

    Clinical Outcome Measures

    Pain: VASNeurologic Status: ASIA scaleBrainstem Disability: BDI*Function: K.P.S and N.D.IQ.O.L: SF-36 Mental + Physical* All above (Except BDI) are validated & reliabl

    *H enderson e t a l , Surgica l Neu rology In tern l In Press 2010

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    10/19

    Finite Element Assessment The analysis is based on different moduli of elasticity to white and gray matterSCOSIA Technology: Virtual Computation

    Models the brainstem, C-spine, and upper T spinacord under dynamic loading and strainComputes predicted relative magnitude and locatioof stress within the Neuraxis

    Current use of FEA is NON-Validated

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    11/19

    Finite Element Assessment

    Performed on 2 representative patientsFEA: Measures Predicted Stress across Neuraxis

    WADI/II vs. WADIII in Flexion WADIII: with DDD/Stenosis/Odontoid Retrof

    Higher Predicted Stresses in Brainstem MedullaLow C-spine cord

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    12/19

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    13/19

    Pictures Flexion/Stress WAD I/II (5N/Cm2) WAD III ( 58N/Cm2)

    C1

    Brainstem

    Brainstem

    C3

    C4

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    14/19

    Clivo-axial Angle CC strain Normal 150-165 degree Odontoid Retroflexion

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    15/19

    Results - Discussion

    Day 0: WADI/II: Better + Higher (Neuro assessment,Functional Performance, QOL)

    VAS scores were comparable12months:

    Both Gps Improved: Neuro status + Disability Sx

    WADIII: Sig Improvement QOL/Funct Recov WADI/II: Deterioration QOL/Functional status

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    16/19

    FEA

    Predicted Higher Stress within Neuraxis:Pre-existing DDDOdontoid Retroflexion

    Resulting Neuro-deficits: Mostly recoverable

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    17/19

    ClinicalOutcome

    Measures

    VAS ASIA BDI NDI KPS SF-36 P SF

    Case0/12 mo

    5.5/1.6 284/318 85%/36% 43/20 70/88 33/49 40/49

    Control0/12 mo

    6/4 324/324 15%/8.5% 53/27 86/85 55/45 55/54

    P-values0/12 mo .1/. 001 .01/.01 0.001 .01/.01 .001/.01 .001/.05 .00

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    18/19

    Conclusion

    Whiplash Associated Disorders I/II and WADIII are distinct entities

    Patho-anatomy:

    MSK injuries WAD I/IICord stretching injuries WAD III

    Prognosis WADI/II: Chronic neck pain

    WADIII: Neurologic Sx are mostly recoverable

  • 8/7/2019 Chadi Whiplash

    19/19

    Conclusion

    Our results are at variance with others whoreport that WADIII is persistent anddebilitating.

    The WAD is not a continuum of one entitiy