Upload
dodieu
View
223
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/joc.1135
A NEW INSTRUMENTAL PRECIPITATION DATASET FOR THE GREATERALPINE REGION FOR THE PERIOD 1800–2002
INGEBORG AUER,a,* REINHARD BOHM,a ANITA JURKOVIC,a ALEXANDER ORLIK,a ROLAND POTZMANN,a
WOLFGANG SCHONER,a MARKUS UNGERSBOCK,a MICHELE BRUNETTI,b TERESA NANNI,b MAURIZIO MAUGERI,c
KEITH BRIFFA,d PHIL JONES,d DIMITRIOS EFTHYMIADIS,d OLIVIER MESTRE,e JEAN-MARC MOISSELIN,e
MICHAEL BEGERT,f RUDOLF BRAZDIL,g OLIVER BOCHNICEK,h TANJA CEGNAR,i MARJANA GAJIC-CAPKA,j
KSENIJA ZANINOVIC,j ZELJKO MAJSTOROVIC,k SANDOR SZALAI,l TAMAS SZENTIMREYl and LUCA MERCALLIm
a ZAMG–Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austriab Istituto ISAC-CNR, Bologna, Italy
c Istituto di Fisica Generale Applicata, Universita di Milano, Milan, Italyd CRU–Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
e Meteo France, Toulouse, Francef MeteoSchweiz, Zurich, Switzerland
g Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republich SHMU, Bratislava, Slovakiai HMZS, Ljubljana, Slovenia
j DHMZ, Zagreb, Croatiak FMZ, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
l HMS, Budapest, Hungarym SMI, Torino, Italy
Received 30 March 2004Revised 25 October 2004Accepted 25 October 2004
ABSTRACT
The paper describes the development of a dataset of 192 monthly precipitation series covering the greater alpine region(GAR, 4–18 °E by 43–49 °N). A few of the time series extend back to 1800. A description is provided of the sometimeslaborious processes that were involved in this work: from locating the original sources of the data to homogenizing therecords and eliminating as many of the outliers as possible. Locating the records required exhaustive searches of archivescurrently held in yearbooks and other sources of the states, countries and smaller regional authorities that existed atvarious times during the last 200 years. Homogeneity of each record was assessed by comparison with neighbouringseries, although this becomes difficult when the density of stations reduces in the earliest years. An additional 47 serieswere used, but the density of the sites in Austria and Switzerland was reduced to maintain an even coverage in spaceacross the whole of the GAR. We are confident of the series back to 1840, but the quality of data before this date mustbe considered poorer. Of all of the issues involved in homogenizing these data, perhaps the most serious problem isassociated with the differences in the height above ground of the precipitation gauges, in particular the general loweringof gauge heights in the late 19th century for all countries, with the exception of Italy. The standard gauge height in theearly-to-mid 19th century was 15–30 m above the ground, with gauges being generally sited on rooftops. Adjustments tosome series of the order of 30–50% are necessary for compatibility with the near-ground location of gauges during muchof the 20th century. Adjustments are sometimes larger in the winter, when catching snowfall presents serious problems.Data from mountain-top observatories have not been included in this compilation (because of the problem of measuringsnowfall), so the highest gauge sites are at elevations of 1600–1900 m in high alpine valley locations. Two subsequentpapers will analyse the dataset. The first will compare the series with other large-scale precipitation datasets for thisregion, and the second will describe the major modes of temporal variability of precipitation totals in different seasonsand determine coherent regions of spatial variability. Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society.
KEY WORDS: monthly precipitation time series; homogeneity; instrumental period; greater alpine region
* Correspondence to: Ingeborg Auer, Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Hohe Warte 38, A-1190 Wien, Austria;e-mail: [email protected]
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society
140 I. AUER ET AL.
1. INTRODUCTION
The reconstruction of climate variability during the instrumental period has, to date, progressed via two mainapproaches: (1) an intended focus on the ‘continental to global’ scale, e.g. the development of gridded datasetssuch as those of the Climatic Research Unit, UK (Hulme, 1994; Jones and Moberg, 2003), and (2) a focus ata more ‘national’ scale, where various individual national datasets are developed in isolation (e.g. Auer et al.,2001). Complete and accurate global datasets are the ideal basis for climate research, but, invariably, large-scale data compilations are likely to have some deficiencies, such as low spatial resolution and varying dataquality. So, although national studies can achieve better data quality (where data homogenization is based on ahigher density of stations and detailed station histories) they are artificially limited by national borders that donot necessarily coincide with coherent climatic regions. The first steps in creating supra-national precipitationdatasets for the Alps and their surroundings had been taken, for example, by Schmidli et al. (2001, 2002).They concentrated on data collection and analysis and worked with samples of 20 to 100 years. As the datapotential in the region extends further back and as the homogeneity problems had yet to be completely solved,further investments into data improvement, mainly in terms of length and quality, seemed eligible.
Some years ago, we began a joint effort to develop instrumental datasets for the ‘greater alpine region’(GAR), encompassing the Alps and their surroundings from 4° to 18 °E and from 43° to 49 °N), thus tryingto bridge the gap between global-to-continental and national scales, as well as to overcome the still existingshortcomings of homogeneity and length. The GAR is an interesting region for a number of reasons. Itprovides a density and length of long-term climate data not easily attainable in many other regions. It is atransitional region, lying between at least three climatic zones (Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Europeancontinent) and additionally influenced by elevational effects. The climate data for the GAR originate frommore than 15 different data providers. Although this complicates data collection and integration, it helps inthe detection of systematic biases that might be due to specific national, observational practices. The recentlydeveloped database system HISTALP (Ungersbock et al., 2003) was employed to hold, test, correct, adjustand study original and homogenized monthly instrumental climate time series and metadata from stationhistories in the GAR. The ultimate goal is to extend HISTALP to include all climate elements appropriatefor homogenization (see the regional subset of nine climate elements given by Auer et al. (2001)). A firstpublication (Bohm et al., 2001) describes the variability of monthly mean temperatures in the GAR forthe period 1760 to 1998 (a reanalysis and update is currently in preparation). Currently, four other climateelements are being analysed: air pressure, sunshine, cloudiness and snow cover.
This paper describes the development of monthly precipitation series from 1800 to 2002. Unlike temperature,which is easier to homogenize because of its greater spatial coherence, precipitation data require much greatereffort, as their variability is more spatially complex. The content of this paper is restricted to a description ofdataset homogeneity and development. Two subsequent companion papers will describe the results of detailedanalyses of the data.
2. HISTORICAL REVIEW
The GAR has been subject to intensive historical development during the past two centuries. The climate datain the region have always been produced and managed by a number of regional or local authorities, by singlescientific institutes and later by national weather services. Thus, a historical review of the two centuries ofthe ‘instrumental precipitation period’ may help to understand better the difficulties that had to be solved toproduce a coherent dataset. Figure 1 shows the number of stations available for each year of the study period1800–2002. Figure 2 illustrates the history of changing political boundaries for eight subperiods with stablecountry borders, together with the respective station network in each subperiod.
Although a prominent early attempt to establish a real climatic measuring network — that of the ‘SocietasMeteorologica Palatina’ (Anon., 1783; see also Kington (1974)) — had already ended in 1792, some of its
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 141
020406080
100120140160180200
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
num
ber
of s
erie
s
Figure 1. Development of the network of precipitation gauges still recording and homogenizable in the GAR
stations and general procedures (the standardization of instruments, regular observing hours, etc.) survivedand provided the core of climatic information during the first part of the 19th century. The first 15 years of theinstrumental period (for precipitation starting in 1800/earlier, series exist but are too scarce for homogeneitytesting and adjusting) were unsettled, strongly influenced by the Napoleonic wars. On the one hand, therewas much progress in those times towards the development of a modern scientific outlook (a general open-mindedness towards new ideas, the metric system, freedom of thought). On the other hand, the simple factthat sporadic warfare was commonplace for much of the time hindered a regular and steady developmentof sciences like climatology that rely to a large extent on the development of standardized techniques andadoption of general concepts, such as the use of common instruments and the continuity of observing networks.For the first two decades of the 19th century, precipitation series (five in 1800, 16 in 1815) existed mainlydue to the ongoing activities of a number of physical institutes and/or astronomical observatories (e.g. Torino,Bologna, Milano-Brera, Padova, Marseille, Strasbourg, Hohenpeissenberg, Regensburg, Karlsruhe).
From 1815 (Vienna-Congress) until 1859 (Battle of Solferino) the political borders in the region remainedfixed (see the first map of Figure 2). It was in this period that regional precipitation networks began to develop.They were maintained by scientific and/or economic societies and led to an expansion of the precipitationnetwork in the region to 26 series by 1850 (typical examples were the agricultural societies of Moravia and ofCarinthia). From 1850 to 1859 the number of stations more than doubled (to 56), mainly due to the activitiesof the first large-scale weather service in the region (the Austrian ‘K.K. Central-Anstalt fur Meteorologieund Erdmagnetismus’, founded in 1851). The period from 1859 to 1866–67 (maps 2 and 3 of Figure 2) wascharacterized in political terms by the birth of the Italian nation (‘risorgimento’) involving the unification(in the GAR) of Piedmont, Tuscany, Modena, Parma, Lombardy–Veneto, and parts of the Church State tothe new Italy. In terms of management of the climate network, the traditional Italian observatories remainedlargely autonomous individual bodies with a high degree of scientific freedom, though, with some limits ofregional, national or international coordination. In 1863, the foundation of the Swiss meteorological network(now maintained by ‘MeteoSwiss’) set a new benchmark and was responsible for a significant increase in theavailable precipitation series from 56 to 85. Switzerland has always been a stable part of the GAR region.In political terms it is notable that it has had no change of borders during the entire study period, and it hasoperated a consistent network of climatological stations. The Italian and the Swiss approaches are, in someaspects, counterparts. Switzerland has followed a philosophy of centralized network management, whereas inItaly the observatories have followed their own individual paths. Neither approach can be considered ‘best’ interms of providing data for the reconstruction of climatic time series. Although a higher homogeneity in themethods of observation can be an obvious useful feature, it does present major problems. Sudden synchronizedchanges in the whole network can occur, leading to inhomogeneities that are difficult to eliminate. Another‘monolithic block’ in the GAR used to be the Austrian Empire, whose weather service set the standards fornearly half of the study region in the mid-19th century. The standardization survived the separation of themonarchy into Austrian and Hungarian parts in 1867 (in administrative terms, a Hungarian weather servicewas founded in 1871, see map 4 in Figure 2), and also exerted an influence on the weather services of thesuccessor states after 1918 (map 6, Figure 2).
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
142 I. AUER ET AL.
Figure 2. Historical political maps of the study region from 1815 to 2002. Dots: HISTALP precipitation sites at the end of the respectiveperiod. Numerical country codes: (1) France, (2) Switzerland, (3) Piedmont and Sardinia, (4) Parma, (5) Modena, (6) Tuscany, (7) ChurchState, (8) Austria, (9) Ottoman Empire, (10) Bavaria, (11) Wurttemberg, (12) Baden, (13) Italy, (14) Germany, (15) Alsace–Lorraine,(16) Hungary, (17) Czechoslovakia, (18) Yugoslavia, (19) Czech Republic, (20) Slovakia, (21) Slovenia, (22) Croatia, (23) Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 143
Also in 1871, the Franco-German war changed the borders between France and the new German state (map4, Figure 2). In 1878, the foundation of the ‘Bureau Central de Meteorologie’ initiated another sudden increasein station numbers with well-organized and high-quality time series in the French part of the GAR adding tothe existing traditional sites of Marseille, Orange, Lyon, Dijon, Nancy and Strasbourg (the latter being underGerman administration from 1871 to 1918). Also in 1878, Austria occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina (Congressof Berlin) and installed a regional weather service there (map 5, Figure 2). Thanks to a recently reinstatedcooperation with the now independent Bosnia and Herzegovina, nine precipitation series starting in the 1870sand 1880s could be developed and now constitute the southeast part of the GAR network. Also, despite thedeclaration of a united German empire in 1871, the regional weather services of Baden, Wurttemberg, Bavariaand Alsace–Lorraine remained relatively independent bodies with some individual evolution of instruments,network management and producing their own yearbooks that continued to be separately published up to the1930s (see Table II). The 1880s, 1890s and the pre-World War I period until 1914 saw no new border changesin the GAR (map 5, Figure 2) and the precipitation network almost reached its maximum density with 192series in this period.
The war of 1914–18 caused fundamental political changes and was a period of great difficulty with respectto the continuation of climatic time series. Map 6 in Figure 2 (compare this with map 5) shows the well-known fundamental changes of political borders. It took a number of years until the new authorities couldestablish well-organized climatic networks again. Problems at this time mainly affected the territory of theformer Austro-Hungarian monarchy, although treaties with the successor states (St Germain, Trianon) alloweda continuity in handling of all data, metadata and instruments. In practice, this did not really work. Extensivegaps in many series occurred until the mid 1920s. These could not be entirely filled. Similar problems werecaused by World War II, but these were associated with the years of warfare, 1939–45, and the post-warrecovery of the climate network was much more rapid and was achieved by the late 1940s.
The most recent political interference in the GAR happened in the early 1990s (maps 7 and 8). Theysaw the peaceful separation of Czechoslovakia, with no influence on the archiving of climatic series. Incontrast, the militant separation of the former Yugoslavia into (in the GAR) Slovenia, Croatia and, Bosniaand Herzegovina led to severe problems with the climate series of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Large amountsof missing data since 1992 have not yet been filled by the national weather service, although attempts areunder way to address this issue.
3. DATA SOURCES
Three main data sources were used to establish the precipitation dataset in the GAR. The first comprises thealready digitized data supplied by the national and subnational data holders (Table I). Roughly 70% of all datawere available in this form, but with metadata only for some rare exceptions (15 series with extensive digitalmetadata from ZAMG, and limited electronic background information from Meteo France). Some (less than10) series could be electronically completed using data from NOAA’s GHCN databank (Vose et al., 1992).The greatest part of the missing 30% and the majority of all metadata had to be collected and digitized frompublished data in yearbooks (Table II), from compendia of printed data (Millosevich, 1882, 1885; Liznar,1886; Mohorovicic, 1902; Eredia, 1908, 1919, 1925; Maurer et al., 1909; Schuepp, 1964; Attmannspacher,1981; SMA, 1981; Penzar et al., 1992; Katusin, 1994; Luksic, 1996; Moisselin et al., 2002; DHMZ, 1998,2002) and also from unpublished original sheets and station history files. For the recent 50 years there is nearly100% coverage with electronic data. Further back, the ‘digital to non-digital ratio’ decreased considerably. Inmany cases the early parts of series could be recovered and digitized. These significantly increase the valueof the GAR database, enabling the study of two entire centuries of precipitation variability in the region.
All data were expressed as monthly totals in millimetres. As not all totals (especially the earlier data fromyearbooks) were available in tenths of millimetres, all totals were rounded to the nearest whole millimetre.During most of the 19th century, precipitation was originally measured in non-metric units (regionally differentkinds of inches and lines; in most cases, even outside France, the ‘ligne de Paris’ was the most commonmeasure of length). The transfer to metric units was undertaken by the data holders. It should be mentioned
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
144 I. AUER ET AL.
Table I. Data and metadata source 1: electronic data supplied by national and subnational data holders
ZAMG, Vienna Complete series for the recent Austria, most of them prehomogenized; 15 series alsowith metadata in electronic form (Auer, 1993; Auer et al., 2001)
MeteoSwiss, Zurich All Swiss series back to 1901, some prehomogenized (Aschwanden et al., 1996a,b;Begert et al., 2003)
DWD, Offenbach All German series back to the 1940s, not homogenized; two prehomogenized seriesback to the 1870s (Herzog and Muller-Westermeier, 1998)
Meteo France, Toulouse Most of the French series in complete length, some prehomogenized, most series alsowith metadata in electronic form (Moisselin et al., 2002)
CNR-ISAC, Bologna Most of the Italian series in full length and quality checked (Buffoni and Chlistovsky,1992; Bellume et al., 1998; Buffoni et al., 1999; Brunetti et al., 2000a,b, 2001) plussome Croatian data from the Italian period between the two world wars
SMI, Torino All Italian series from Piedmont in full length and quality checked (Romano andMercalli, 1994; Di Napoli, 1996)
Hydrology Service of theProvince of Bolzano/Bozen
Three series in full length (W. Rigott, personal communication)
HMZS, Ljubljana All Slovenian series back to 1871DHMZ, Zagreb Most of the Croatian series in full length plus metadata informationFMZ, Sarajevo All series from Bosnia and Herzegovina back to the 1940sHMS, Budapest Some complete and quality-controlled Hungarian series (S. Szalai and T. Szentimrey,
personal communication)SHMU, Bratislava All Slovakian series, in full length and prehomogenizedMasaryk University, Brno Brno series in full length plus metadata
here that even such apparently easy calculations turned out not to be that trivial in a number of cases. Wefound, for example, original data sheets where it was not clear whether 1 inch was subdivided into 10 or 12lines. It was not possible in each case to solve the problems of measuring units, so some early parts of serieshad to be truncated.
Some of the series had already been preprocessed using different methods of homogeneity testing andadjustment (see Table I). To obtain a uniform database, the original versions were reconstructed for all butnine series. The expression ‘original’ will be used henceforth for quality-controlled but not homogenized andinfilled data. All of the 183 original and nine ‘prehomogenized’ series were then further processed to providehomogenized series as described in the following sections.
4. GENERAL REMARKS ON THE HOMOGENEITY PROBLEM
There is general agreement among climatologists that only a part of the variability of an instrumentalclimate time series reflects real or ‘true’ climate variability. There is always a certain part that is due toa number of non-climatic factors (station relocations, changes of the surroundings, instrumental incuracies,poor installation, observational and calculation rules, etc.). A recent WMO publication (Aguilar et al., 2003)clearly states that ‘all of these inhomogeneities can bias a time series and lead to misinterpretations of thestudied climate. It is important, therefore, to remove the inhomogeneities or at least to determine the possibleerror they may cause’. Most climatologists are aware of the homogeneity problem. Good reviews on methodsand practical experience are given by Peterson et al. (1998) and by the homogeneity seminars in Budapest atregular intervals (Hungarian Meteorological Service, 1997, 2001; Szalai et al., 1999; Szalai and Szentimrey,2004), but it is still not yet a rigid rule for all studies of climate variability to rely on a ‘clean’ and clearlydefined database in terms of homogeneity. It is often argued that homogenizing should be avoided in ordernot to disturb physical laws (e.g. independently homogenized temperature and relative humidity series thatmay produce problems with thermodynamic laws). A second argument against homogenizing is the dangerof distant climatic signals from one (or a few) reference series being transferred to many homogenized
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 145
Table II. Data and metadata source 2: published data in yearbooks
1. Jahrbucher der K. k. Central-Anstalt fur Meteorologie und Erdmagnetismus (Meteorological Yearbooks ofthe former Austria), 1848 to 1903
2. Jahrbucher der Zentralanstalt fur Meteorologie und Geodynamik (Meteorological Yearbooks seriescontinued under new name, until 1916 for the former Austria, since 1917 for the modern Austria) 1904 to2002
3. Beitrage zur Hydrographie Osterreichs, Heft 10, Lieferung I, II und III (Compendium of early (1792–1905)precipitation data from Switzerland, Bavaria and the former Austria), Wien, 1913–14
4. Jahrbucher des K. k. hydrographischen Central-Bureau (Hydrographical Yearbooks of the former Austria)1893 to 1912
5. Hydrographische Jahrbucher von Osterreich (Hydrographical Yearbooks of Austria), 1913–20026. Meteorologische Beobachtungen an den Landesstationen in Bosnien und Herzegovina (Meteorological
Yearbooks of Bosnia and Herzegovina), 1892 to 19127. Podaci meteoroloskih opazanja u Bosni i Hercegovini u godini 1913 (Meteorological Yearbook of Bosnia
and Herzegovina), 19138. Godisnje izvjesce, Kr. zem. zavoda za meteorologiju i geodynamiku (Geofizickog zavoda) u Zagrebu za
godine 1914–22 (Meteorological Yearbooks of the former Yugoslavia), godista XIV–XXII, dio IIIBeograd, 1939
9. 1924–40 Izvjestaj o vodenim talozima, vodostajem i kolicinama vode za 1923 god, Kraljevina Jugoslavija,Ministarstvo gradjevina, Hidrotehnicko odelenje-, (Hydrological compendium for the kingdom ofYugoslavia) Beograd, Sarajevo, 1924
10. Padavine u Jugoslaviji, Rezultati osmatranija za period 1925–40 (Precipitation in Yugoslavia, 1925–40),Beograd, 1957
11. Izvestaj o padavinama za 1941–49 (Precipitation reviews of Yugoslavia), Nova Gradiska, Beograd,1952–86
12. Rocenka povetrnostnich pozorovani meteorologickych stanic (Czechoslovakian meteorological yearbooks),1925–64
13. Annales du Bureau Central Meteorologique (Meteorological Yearbooks of France), 1878–192014. Resume Mensuel du Temps en France (Monthly climate bulletin of France), 1929–8815. Bulletin Climatique (Monthly climate bulletin of France), 1989–200216. Meteorologische Beobachtungen im Grossherzogthum Baden (Meteorological Yearbooks of Baden),
1869–193317. Wurttembergisches Meteorologisches Jahrbuch (Meteorological Yearbooks of Wurttemberg), 1867–193318. Beobachtungen der meteorologischen Stationen im Konigreich Bayern (Meteorological Yearbooks of
Bavaria), 1879–193419. Ergebnisse der meteorologischen Beobachtungen im Reichsland Elsass-Lothringen — Annuaires
Meteorologiques d’Alsace et de Lorraine (Meteorological Yearbooks of Alsace and Lorraine), 1890–191820. Annuaires (Annales) de l’Institut de Physique du Globe (Meteorological Yearbooks of Alsace and
Lorraine), 1919–4721. Deutsches Meteorologisches Jahrbuch (Meteorological Yearbooks of Germany), 1934–2002 (1946–87
GDR-excluded)22. Meteorologiai es Foldmagnessegi — Intezet — Evkonyvei (Meteorological Yearbooks of Hungary),
1871–198923. Meteorologia Italiana (Meteorological Yearbooks of Italy, series 1), 1865–7424. Annali dell’ Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia e Geofisica Italiano (Meteorological Yearbooks of Italy,
series 2), 1879–192525. Servizio Idrografico, (1924 and following years): Annali, Ist. Poligrafico dello Stato, Rome26. Schweizerische Meteorologische Beobachtungen — Annalen der Schweizerischen Meteorologischen
Zentralanstalt (Swiss Meteorological Yearbooks), 1864–200227. Schweizerische Meteorologische Beobachtungen — Supplementband I, Zurich, 1886 (Compendium of
pre-1864 Swiss data in this volume and in the first 12 volumes of the ‘Annalen’)
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
146 I. AUER ET AL.
series, with the final result that existing spatial variability becomes extensively smoothed. The most commonargument against homogenizing is based on the hope that, for a large number of series, the inhomogeneitiesbecome random and can thus be neglected.
Our own experience in the field of homogenizing leads us to a point of view that extends beyond thatexpressed in the WMO statement (Aguilar et al., 2003). We believe (and will show in detail in this study withexamples from the dense and long-term precipitation network) that all series exceeding a few decades are‘infected’ by non-climatic information. Further, for larger regions (e.g. entire national networks) systematicbiases are possible, but we will also show that with certain precautions a great part of those inhomogeneitiescan be removed. We will also show this for time series of monthly resolution only. Our limited experiencewith homogenizing daily series has shown severe problems, mainly due to the rapid decorrelation of dailyclimate series with increasing station separation (Scheifinger et al., 2003). We believe that there still needsto be a methodological breakthrough in the field of homogenizing daily series, not so much concerning thedetection of ‘breaks’ but much more with the problem of how to adjust the series.
As the present study is devoted to one climate element only, we will not deal here with the possibleviolations of laws of atmospheric physics through homogenization, but we plan to explore this issue in thefuture through the use of regional climate modelling in the GAR.
5. PROCESSING THE DATA (HOMOGENEITY TESTS, OUTLIERS, METADATA,ADJUSTMENTS, GAPS)
The nucleus of relative homogeneity testing (e.g. Peterson et al., 1998) is the comparison of two neighbouringtime series of sufficient similarity. In an early ‘classic’ paper on homogenization, Craddock (1979) testedpairs of stations and concluded that best results were obtained by the use of station pairs with the minimumcoefficient of variation of the ratio of the two series. Schonwiese (1985) demanded a sufficiently highcorrelation between the two stations. Our own experience indicates that a minimum value of 50% commonvariance (r2) is required. A value less than 0.5 allows the potential discontinuities in series to disappearinto statistical noise. Spatial correlation between climatic time series depends on various factors that governregional climate patterns (topography, land use, etc.), on the chosen climate element, and on the time resolutionof the series. Scheifinger et al. (2003) studied the variability in spatial structure of air temperature andprecipitation at different time resolutions in the GAR and at the European scale. Figure 3 illustrates one oftheir results: the mean decorrelation (expressed in terms of r2 falling below 0.5) of the two climate elementsfor daily, monthly, seasonal and annual means (or totals respectively). Figure 4 extends this by comparingthe decorrelation distances with the actual interstation distances in the GAR since 1800. The comparison ofFigures 3 and 4 shows that, for annual precipitation series, the critical test criterion (r2 > 0.5) is generallymaintained, on average, after 1840, for seasonal series from 1857, and for monthly series since 1863. Inthis study, homogeneity tests were performed on seasonal and annual series (adjustments were applied to themonthly series). Therefore, before the year 1840, homogeneity testing difficulties become severe. Althoughthe difficulties in the early instrumental period were to some extent reduced by the use of early metadatainformation, it must be stressed that the reliability of the pre-1840 parts of the series is not equal to that forlater times.
Discussion of relative homogeneity testing of daily precipitation series is beyond the scope of this paper.The necessary network density of 42 km is not attainable for longer time series. Though this is not a problemfor the work described here, it is for the increasing number of studies that attempt to describe trends ofshort-term extremes and any other variables that can only be calculated using daily observations.
During the past 10 years the HOCLIS system, a software package for the homogenization of climatologicaltime series, has been developed at ZAMG (Auer et al., 2001b). It allows the use of three different testprocedures, i.e. the CRADDOCK test, the MASH test and the SNHT (Craddock, 1979; Alexandersson, 1986;Alexandersson and Moberg, 1997; Szentimrey, 1997, 1999, 2001), supported by an intensive use of metadata.Our practical experience in homogenizing several hundred single series of different climatic elements (Aueret al., 1999, 2001; Bohm et al., 2001) leads to the conclusion that the choice of any one specific homogeneity
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 147
mean decorrelation (km)
42
105
120
149
533
722
765
993
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
precip-daily
precip-monthly
precip-seasonal
precip-annual
temperature-daily
temperature-monthly
temperature-seasonal
temperature-annual
Figure 3. Average decorrelation distances (r2 decreasing below 0.5) for two climate elements in four time resolutions. Samples: dailyvalues for all of Europe; monthly, seasonal and annual values for the GAR
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
mea
n di
stan
ce (
km)
1800: 381km
1840: 153km
1820: 201km
since 1927: 61km
1900: 63km
1880: 74km
1860: 113km
Figure 4. Temporal evolution of the mean distance between precipitation gauges in the GAR network since 1800
test is of minor importance. There are a number of tests available that provide similar results (e.g. see thereview in Peterson et al. (1998)). More important than the choice of a specific test method is the strictadherence to the seven principles listed below:
1. Ignore any previous homogeneity work undertaken for any of the series (i.e. start from the beginning,assuming all series contain potential breaks).
2. Test in small, well-correlated subregions (a maximum of 10 series tested against each other results in a10 × 10 decision matrix, which enables most breaks detected to be assigned to a most likely candidateseries).
3. Choose the most appropriate reference series with a non-affected subinterval for the adjustment of eachbreak detected (i.e. different reference series can be used for each break detected in a candidate series).
4. Avoid erratic monthly precipitation adjustments by smoothing the annual course of adjustment factors.5. Detect outliers and ‘overshooting adjustments’ using spatial comparisons (by mapping precipitation values
both in absolute and relative units) for each month of the study period.6. Attempt to determine support for homogeneity adjustments when few metadata are available (i.e. contact
data providers for more information in difficult cases).
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
148 I. AUER ET AL.
Figure 5. The precipitation network in the GAR (dots) with the subregions for regionally independent homogeneity testing and adjustment
7. Give preference to good metadata rather than mathematical methods in all cases, especially whereadjustment factors can be calculated directly from sufficiently long series of parallel measurements.
Details for the attribution (principles 1 and 2) of a single break (only detects ‘relative breaks’ with a pairof stations) to the determination of the errant series are well described by Auer et al. (2001), following theprinciple of the subregional decision matrix (Mestre, 1999). Figure 5 shows the subregions in which theregional testing was performed in most cases (with the exception of increasing metadata support and thenecessary extension across subregional borders for the early decades).
Principle 3 is a consequence of principle 1: not only for testing, but also for adjustment, no single referenceseries is used for several candidate stations. For each pair of subperiods, before and after one break, a non-affected subperiod of a comparative series is used for the calculation of the adjustment factors, assumingthat the factor between the two series remains constant in the case of homogeneity. The earlier subperiod isalways adjusted to the more recent one, resulting in an unchanged recent period and all earlier subperiodsbeing adjusted to it (this allows for easier updating).
Principle 4 is of special importance for strongly variable climate elements like precipitation. For thehomogenization of the GAR temperature series (Bohm et al., 2001) it could be neglected. Temperatureadjustments (additive) were calculated separately for each single month, resulting in more or less pronounced,but rather steady annual courses of the adjustment differences. The monthly adjustment factors for precipitationseries, in contrast, showed an irregular annual course in many cases. Their application produced unacceptablechanges of the annual course of the adjusted series. The conclusion based on previous homogeneity studies(e.g. Moisselin et al., 2002) is that one annual mean adjustment factor for all 12 months should be used.Comparative series of nearby or on-site parallel measurements, however, clearly show that constancy ofmonthly ratios between two series is very rare. Examples are shown later. Therefore, another method toinvestigate the problem was chosen, one that did not eliminate the seasonality of the adjustment factors:monthly factors are calculated separately for each break first, and these are subsequently smoothed. A 7 monthGaussian low-pass filter was used, which allows for one- or bi-modal annual variation and damps all higherfrequency variation. Figure 6 shows three examples for unfiltered and filtered monthly adjustment factors.The smoothing obviously also reduces another typical homogeneity problem. Often, subintervals between thedetected breaks are too short to allow the calculation of adjustment factors. The smoothing potentially increasesthe sample size by adding information from neighbouring months, e.g. an adjustment value of August alsoincludes the information of May, June and July, as well as of September, October and November. This allowsus to adjust a great number of short subperiods that would otherwise have to be left unchanged without
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 149
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
Lyon (FR) 1841-1864 Venezia (IT) 1837-1866 Luzern (CH) 1882-1900
Figure 6. Three examples of smoothed (bold) and unsmoothed (thin) monthly adjustment factors (smoothing by a 7 month Gaussianlow-pass filter)
22m
/1m
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
VHohenpeissenberg (DE)
14.5
m/1
.3m
(%
)
Pula (HR)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
Admont (AT)
over
catc
h er
ror
(%)
Figure 7. Mean monthly ratios of parallel on-site measurements or highly correlated comparative series for (from left to right)Hohenpeissenberg (DE, 1800–78, 22 m rooftop versus near to ground installation), Pula (HR, 1873–97, 14.5 m measuring platform
versus 1.3 m) and Admont (AT, 1991–2002, two different locations and orifices on site in summer and winter)
smoothing. Differences in the adjustment factors based on non-smoothed and smoothed data have beencompared for all series. With very few exceptions, the seasonal course of precipitation remained unchangedafter adjustment with smoothed factors.
Figure 7 shows three examples for cases with long-term parallel measurements (a good illustration of theadvantage of having strong metadata support). The graphs underline the necessity of allowing a degree ofannual variation of the adjustment factors. The Hohenpeissenberg case shows the most extreme adjustmentsin the entire network. The extreme undercatch was caused by the well-known combined effects of wind andsnow on precipitation measurements on the exposed hilltop in the Bavarian Pre-Alps. The Pula examplehas similar causes (exposed versus shaded exposure), but the adjustments are less dramatic and the annualvariation is less pronounced. Located on the Adriatic coast, Pula has a much lower ratio of solid to liquidprecipitation, which reduces the undercatch of the exposed tower installation. The Admont case illustratesthat strange things can happen, but we can still produce the annual cycle of adjustments. Here, the observerhad the habit (unknown by the weather service for 12 years!) of removing the upper part of the gauge (thus
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
150 I. AUER ET AL.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
JAN
MA
R
MA
Y
JUL
SE
P
NO
V
Padova (IT) 1841-1850 Rovereto (IT) 1941-1950 Firenze (IT) 1911-1920
Figure 8. Annual course of decadal mean monthly precipitation (mm) of three Italian sites for original data (bold), and for adjusted databy the old (not smoothed) system (dotted) versus the new (smoothed) adjusting system (thin)
producing a larger orifice) and moving it in winter from the mounting pile to a site near to the house forconvenience (thus producing a remarkable overcatch, especially in winter, compared with the official, morewind-exposed site in the garden).
The three examples of Figure 8 illustrate the overwhelming majority of cases for which the smoothingmethod considerably reduced the problem of biased annual precipitation course caused by erratic annualcycles in the adjustment factors. The problem is more severe in the Mediterranean climate (with strongerprecipitation variability), but it also exists north of the Alps. Hence, the smoothing method was applied toall series for the GAR.
Principle 5 assesses overshooting adjustments, real outliers and false dry months. Although the smoothingmethod also has the positive side-effect of reducing the problem of ‘overshooting adjustments’ it cannotcompletely avoid them. Overshooting, again, is a special problem of highly variable climate elements likeprecipitation. It happens when adjustment factors (derived as the mean ratio of a number of pairs of monthlytotals of two series) are applied to single months that considerably exceed the long-term mean. It can happenthat ‘apparent outliers’ are produced with unrealistically high monthly totals. Together with the fact that, inthe original data, a greater number of questionable high (and low) values already existed, the overshootingproblem had to be solved together with that of real outliers. After trying some less effective ways (isolationof excessive values using monthly frequency distributions, for example) it was finally decided that it wasnecessary to follow a time-consuming method of controlling the spatial precipitation fields of all single monthsfrom 1800 to 2002. A modified version of ZAMG’s routine procedure GEKIS (Potzmann, 1999) for assessingreal-time data allowed a quick look at analysed monthly GAR precipitation fields. An accentuated spline-kriging of each of the relative homogenized (deviations from 1961 to 1990 average as a percentage) data, theabsolute homogenized (millimetres) data, and of the original values, enabled rapid decisions as to whethera value was a potential outlier or not. For the great majority of months and subregions the relative analysesbrought better results. Only for dry summer months in the Mediterranean was the spatial distribution smoother(and, therefore, real outliers easier to detect) for absolute values than for the strongly varying relative values(a July value of 70 mm for the Riviera site Imperia, for example, means a 600% excess over the long-termnormal of 10 mm — not necessarily an outlier).
The vast majority of the suspected outliers were caused by overshooting adjustments. Overshooting wasimproved considerably by the graphical test procedure — replacing the overshooting value by the one resultingfrom kriging of the homogenized anomaly field under exclusion of the value to be corrected. All remainingoutlier suspects (a great number of excessive precipitation values, but also a smaller number of zero valueswere found) were sent to the data holders for more intensive quality checks. About half of the suspectvalues turned out to be true measurements. The remaining errors were then corrected either by inserting
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 151
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Oct 1889:805mm489%
Kornat (AT)
mm
/mon
th
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Oct 1872:776mm387%
Genova (IT)
mm
/mon
th
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Aug 2002:431mm457%
Freistadt (AT)
mm
/mon
th
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Jan 1951:296mm679%
Lienz (AT)
mm
/mon
th
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Jul 1956:89mm740%
Arles (FR)
mm
/mon
th
0100200
300400500600
700800900
1800
1825
1850
1875
1900
1925
1950
1975
2000
Aug 1880:319mm877%
Hvar (HR)
mm
/mon
th
Figure 9. Six examples of homogenized and outlier checked monthly precipitation time series (mm) with ‘excessive’ precipitation:Kornat and Genova (excessive in terms of absolute values); Freistadt and Lienz (excessive flooding and avalanche damage); Arles and
Hvar (excessive in terms of relative values — percentage of long-term mean)
the correct measured values (in the cases of typing errors), by interpolation with data from national climatenetworks (usually denser than the long-term HISTALP network) or by using the values derived from thekriging interpolation of the test procedure. Although the outlier elimination comprised the greater part ofthe whole homogenizing work (2400 single monthly precipitation fields were checked) it was consideredessential. The errors produced by overshooting adjustments were greatly reduced and excessive values thatcan greatly reduce the value of any analysis of extreme events based on less intensively quality-controlleddata were detected. Hence, these data are not only fit for long-term trend analysis, but also for all kinds ofextreme event analysis down to a time resolution of 1 month. Similarly, more confidence can be placed on theremaining statistical outliers (like the examples shown in Figure 9). The six monthly time series in Figure 9also underscore again the difficulties in the use of the terms ‘excessive’ or ‘outlier’. They can be used forhigh absolute monthly precipitation amounts that exceed 800 mm sometimes in the GAR (examples 1 and2, e.g. see Maugeri et al. (1998)). They can be defined by the damage they cause, as is shown in example 3
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
152 I. AUER ET AL.
for the large flooding event in August 2002 in parts of northern Austria, Czech Republic and Germany (seeRudolf and Simmer (2003)); or in example 4 for the avalanche catastrophe in 1951 that destroyed entire partsof alpine villages and also caused great losses of life (Fliri, 1998). Finally, sometimes high relative values(examples 5 and 6) may only be caused by relatively insignificant absolute amounts for regions and seasonswith low averages.
The last two principles, 6 and 7, refer to the use of metadata from station history files. Firstly, the inclusionof metadata provides a very useful support. When homogenizing single series, statistical break detectionis never a simple ‘black-and-white’ decision. There are always grey zones concerning either the strengthof the necessary adjustment, or concerning the precise date of the break. Secondly (unfortunately in rarecases only, as for example those shown in Figure 7), mathematical testing can be completely avoided ifparallel measurements have been performed. Thirdly (an aspect we regard as most important if study regionsare identical with the domains of national weather services), metadata about simultaneous changes in entirenetworks are the only way to detect their consequences; relative homogeneity tests provide zero information insuch cases. A typical example is the recent trend towards automation, which quickly changes whole networkssometimes with remarkable decreases in measured precipitation amounts. Another example is provided bythe simultaneous change of instruments in the 1880s in the precipitation network in the state of Baden. Thisproduced abrupt discontinuities with magnitudes of the order of 30%. A third example, not a sudden break,but a very effective long-term trend, resulted from the general evolution, over the entire GAR, from an oldphilosophy preferring rain gauge installation on high and exposed places to the recent one which tends toavoid the confounding influence of wind through the use of near-to-ground gauges (Figure 10).
The two graphs in Figure 10 show that, in spite of a great variability from site to site (left graph), therehas been a significant decrease of the mean height above ground of rain gauge orifices from 27 m in 1800to 2.7 m 200 years later. In the early years of the study period, platform, roof-top or tower installations upto 50 m above ground were the standard. Nowadays, the WMO recommends 1 to 2 m above ground. Theright graph in Figure 10 indicates that the change from higher to lower heights occurred mainly between1850 and 1880 and for all weather services in the region. In September 1873 (Vienna Congress), it wasstrongly recommended that circular rain gauge orifices only be used, to install rain gauges between 1 and1.5 m above the surface and to provide the information on rain gauge heights in publications (Authorityof the Meteorological Committee, 1874). Only in Italy, with its highly individual station management, didmany of the traditional and independent university and observatory sites not follow the general trend. Themean height of the Italian GAR series remains at 7.5 m; the maximum height is 45 m (Genova Observatory).The special situation in Italy is explained by the fact that many of the traditional observations, from historiccity centres (Buffoni and Chlistovsky, 1992; Romano and Mercalli, 1994; Di Napoli, 1996; Bellume et al.,1998; Brunetti et al., 2001), have been maintained at their historical locations. The 25 m of the Milano-Breraobservatory, for example, does not exceed the surrounding urban canopy and the wind-induced precipitation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1800
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
met
ers
abov
e gr
ound
met
ers
abov
e gr
ound
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
IT
BA-SI-HRAT
DE
CH
HU
182 series
Figure 10. Development of the installation height of rain gauges in the GAR 1800 to 2002. Left: all 182 sites with respective metadatainformation (thin) and mean height above ground of all sites (bold). Right: national means (thin) and GAR-mean (bold)
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 153
loss is not that of an isolated tower. The general trend towards lower installations can be considered as theprimary cause of the most severe large-scale systematic changes that had to be applied to the GAR data. Onaverage, the early precipitation series had to be increased by up to 10%, in good agreement with the averagedevelopment of installation heights (more details are provided in Section 6).
Lastly, missing months were replaced by estimates derived from highly correlated comparative series. Thisinfilling uses the same method as the adjustment (based on the assumption of the constancy of ratios). Notethat this infilling was the last of the steps in the process of converting from original to homogenized data.It is not advisable to infill before homogeneity testing, as test signals will become less clear. It may also beargued (in terms of strict mathematics) that gaps should not be infilled at all. We believe that the compellingargument of the advantages for further analysis, which require complete series, outweigh this consideration.In certain cases (if intersite ratios series are analysed, for example) the (documented) gaps can be restored.
6. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF BREAKS, OUTLIERS AND GAPS
The system of data quality improvement described above was successfully applied to 239 long-termprecipitation series in the study region, but the spatial coverage of the 239-sites-dataset was biased by muchhigher densities in Switzerland and Austria compared with the other subregions. Therefore, 24 series inAustria and 23 series in Switzerland were excluded, resulting in an almost even spatial distribution, as shownin Figure 5. For reasons of measurement problems, one recognizable subgroup, i.e. high alpine summitsites, was a priori not included in the homogenization procedure. The highest sites included in the finalnetwork are at altitudes of 1600 to 1900 m a.s.l. and are high-elevation valley sites, not summit sites. For thelatter, the combination of wind exposure and a high contribution from solid precipitation makes precipitationmeasurement extremely difficult (e.g. see Auer (1992) and Auer and Schoner (2001)). Finally, 192 seriesremained as members of the ‘homogenized’ station version of the HISTALP precipitation dataset (Table III).The 192 series are also held in the database in their ‘original’ forms. The quotes are set here to stress oncemore what the suffixes ‘hom’ and ‘ori’ used in the databank represent: ‘hom’ means homogenized, outlier-and overshooting-corrected and with closed gaps, ‘ori’ means ‘as original as possible’ (contemporary dataquality improvements from the data holders were not removed, and it was also not always possible to receivedefinitive information about the real status of the series received in terms of prehomogenization). What hasbeen changed from the ori to the hom versions was analysed quantitatively. The results of the analysis aredescribed in this section.
Table IV sketches the basic statistical characteristics of the HISTALP precipitation homogenization. A totalof 966 breaks and 529 outliers could be detected in the 26 063 station years of 192 series. On average, onebreak could be detected every 23rd year in a series of 136 years in length. The size of the average breakwas 18% (root-square mean of all positive and negative breaks). The most outstanding breaks had valuesup to 238% — resulting from errors concerning non-metric measuring units, inaccurate measuring devicesand other metadata-supported cases (Figure 11, left panel, shows the respective frequency distribution cutat 100%). The typical break detected was not constant during the year (examples in Figure 12). More orless pronounced mono- or bi-modal annual courses of sometimes strong amplitudes were typical (more thanbimodal courses were damped through the use of the smoothing filter, as already described). The right graphof Figure 11 shows the respective frequency distribution of break-amplitudes.
One of the strong points of the HISTALP dataset is its length. However, the extension into the earlyinstrumental period caused several problems. The analysis of the temporal distribution of the breaks detectedcan be used as one possible means of quality estimation of the early instrumental period. Figure 13 showstime series of annually detected breaks in absolute values (breaks per year) in the left graph, and in relation tothe available number of series in the right graph. Already, the comparison of the absolute number of breakswith the number of available series suggests what can be seen more clearly in the right graph: there is only avery slight tendency in the very early years of the 19th century towards a higher break frequency. In general,there is no apparent trend towards less breaks in recent times. It is a moot point as to whether this constancyof breaks is a quality feature, as only the breaks detected could be analysed. The difficulties of testing whennetwork density decreases might also explain at least a part of the stability in breaks detected.
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
154 I. AUER ET AL.
Tabl
eII
I.N
ames
,ab
brev
iatio
ns,lo
catio
nsan
dst
artin
gtim
esof
the
hom
ogen
ized
prec
ipita
tion
series
Rec
entfu
llna
me
Cou
ntry
code
aA
cr.
x(°E)
y(°N
)A
ltitu
de(m
)St
art
Rec
entfu
llna
me
Cou
ntry
code
aA
cr.
x(°E)
y(°N
)A
ltitu
de(m
)St
art
Adm
ont(H
ZB
)AT
AD
M14
.46
47.5
770
018
53Liv
noB
ALV
O17
.02
43.8
372
418
87A
ix-E
n-Pr
oven
ceFR
AIX
5.37
43.5
010
618
92Liv
orno
ITLIV
10.2
543
.55
318
57A
ltdor
fC
HA
LT8.
6346
.87
449
1864
Lju
blja
naSI
LJU
14.5
246
.07
316
1853
Are
zzo
ITA
RE
12.0
043
.45
274
1876
Loc
arno
-Mon
tiC
HLO
C8.
7946
.17
379
1876
Arles
-Sal
ins
deG
irau
dFR
AR
L4.
7243
.41
118
82Lug
ano
CH
LU
G8.
9746
.00
276
1861
Aro
saC
HA
RO
9.68
46.7
818
4718
90Luz
ern
CH
LU
Z8.
3047
.04
456
1861
Aug
sbur
g-St
.Ste
phan
DE
AU
G10
.93
48.4
246
318
12Lyo
n-B
ron
FRLY
O4.
9445
.72
198
1841
Bad
Ble
iber
gAT
BB
L13
.66
46.6
290
718
74M
acon
-Aer
opor
tFR
MA
C4.
8046
.30
216
1887
Bad
Gas
tein
AT
BG
A13
.13
47.1
211
0018
58M
aliLos
inj
HR
MLO
14.4
744
.53
5318
81B
adG
leic
henb
erg
AT
BG
L15
.90
46.8
730
318
79M
anto
vaIT
MA
N10
.75
45.1
520
1840
Bad
Isch
lAT
BIL
13.6
347
.72
469
1858
Mar
ibor
SIM
AB
15.6
546
.57
270
1876
Bal
me
ITB
AL
7.21
45.3
114
3219
14M
arie
nber
g/M
onte
mar
iaIT
MA
I10
.49
46.7
413
2318
58B
anja
Luk
aB
AB
LU
17.2
244
.78
153
1881
Mar
igny
-Le-
Cah
ouet
FRM
LC
4.46
47.4
631
018
80B
ardo
necc
hia
ITB
AR
6.70
45.0
813
4019
14M
arse
ille-
Mar
igna
gne
FRM
AR
5.23
43.4
45
1800
Bas
el-B
inni
ngen
CH
BA
S7.
6047
.60
316
1861
Mila
noIT
MIL
9.00
45.4
712
218
00B
elfo
rtFR
BFT
6.85
47.6
442
218
95M
illst
att
AT
MST
13.5
846
.80
791
1896
Bel
luno
ITB
EL
12.2
546
.12
404
1875
Mon
tmor
od-L
ons
leSa
unie
rFR
MM
O5.
5146
.69
280
1866
Ber
nC
HB
ER
7.43
46.9
556
518
56M
oson
mag
yaro
var
HU
MO
S17
.27
47.8
812
118
59B
erns
tein
AT
BST
16.2
647
.35
600
1859
Mos
tar
BA
MTR
17.8
043
.35
9918
80B
esan
con
FRB
ES
5.99
47.2
530
718
85M
unch
en-S
tadt
DE
MU
N11
.55
48.1
852
518
48B
iel
CH
BIE
7.26
47.1
343
418
83N
ancy
-Ess
eyFR
NA
N6.
2248
.68
217
1811
Bih
acB
AB
IH15
.88
44.8
224
618
89N
aude
rsAT
NA
U10
.50
46.9
013
6018
96B
jelo
var
HR
BJE
16.8
545
.90
141
1872
Neu
chat
elC
HN
CH
6.95
47.0
048
518
56B
olog
naIT
BO
L11
.25
44.4
860
1813
Nic
e-C
apFe
rrat
FRN
IF7.
3043
.68
138
1900
Boz
en/B
olza
noIT
BO
Z11
.33
46.5
027
218
56N
ice-
Aer
opor
tFR
NIC
7.20
43.6
54
1870
Bra
ITB
RA
7.87
44.7
029
018
63O
bers
tdor
fD
EO
BS
10.2
747
.38
810
1886
Bra
tisla
vaSK
BR
L17
.10
48.1
728
018
57O
dere
nFR
OD
E6.
9847
.92
450
1890
Bre
genz
AT
BR
E9.
7347
.50
424
1874
Ora
nge
FRO
RA
4.85
44.1
453
1817
Brixe
n/B
ress
anon
eIT
BR
X11
.65
46.7
256
918
78O
sije
kH
RO
SK18
.67
45.5
591
1899
Brn
o-Tur
any
CZ
BR
N16
.70
49.1
624
118
05O
vada
ITO
VA
8.64
44.6
418
719
14B
ruck
/Mur
AT
BM
U15
.26
47.4
148
218
76Pa
dova
ITPA
D11
.75
45.4
014
1800
Bud
apes
t-Lor
inc
HU
BU
L19
.22
47.4
513
018
42Pa
pa-P
anno
nhal
ma
HU
PAP
17.4
847
.32
147
1857
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 155
Cas
ale
Mon
ferr
ato
ITC
AS
8.50
45.1
311
318
70Pa
rma
ITPA
R10
.25
44.8
057
1833
Cel
jeSI
CEL
15.2
746
.23
234
1853
Pavi
aIT
PAV
9.25
45.1
775
1812
Cer
esol
eR
eale
ITC
ER
7.25
45.4
315
7919
27Pa
yern
eC
HPA
Y6.
9446
.82
450
1900
Cha
ncea
uxFR
CH
A4.
7247
.52
462
1880
Pazi
nH
RPA
Z13
.93
45.2
329
118
85C
hang
ins
CH
CH
G6.
2346
.40
430
1901
Pec
sH
UPE
C18
.17
46.0
615
018
54C
haum
ont
CH
CH
T6.
9947
.05
1073
1864
Peru
gia
ITPR
G12
.50
43.1
052
018
36C
luny
FRC
LU
4.67
46.4
324
018
79Pes
aro
ITPE
S13
.00
43.8
711
1866
Col
mar
FRC
OL
7.36
48.0
819
018
91Pi
acen
zaIT
PIA
9.75
45.0
250
1872
Crikv
enic
aH
RC
RK
14.7
045
.19
1018
91Po
uilly
-En-
Aux
ois
FRPO
U4.
5647
.25
408
1880
Cun
eoIT
CU
N7.
5044
.40
536
1877
Poze
gaH
RPO
Z17
.68
45.3
315
218
83D
elem
ont
CH
DEL
7.35
47.3
641
619
01Pr
ozor
BA
PRZ
17.6
243
.83
800
1892
Deu
tsch
land
sber
gAT
DLB
15.2
246
.83
410
1893
Pula
HR
PUL
13.8
544
.87
3018
65D
ijon-
Lon
gvic
FRD
IJ5.
0847
.27
227
1831
Rad
stad
tAT
RA
D13
.45
47.3
884
518
96Ebn
at-K
appe
lC
HEB
N9.
1247
.27
629
1880
Rau
ris
AT
RA
U12
.99
47.2
293
418
76Ein
sied
eln
CH
EIN
8.76
47.1
391
018
64R
egen
sbur
gD
ER
BG
12.1
049
.03
366
1800
Eis
enka
ppel
AT
EIS
14.5
946
.49
623
1886
Reg
gio
Em
iglia
ITR
EM
10.7
544
.70
6218
67Elm
CH
ELM
9.17
46.9
296
218
78R
etz
AT
RET
15.9
548
.77
242
1895
Eng
elbe
rgC
HEN
G8.
4146
.82
1035
1864
Rhe
infe
lden
CH
RH
E7.
8147
.57
271
1883
Feld
kirc
hAT
FEL
9.62
47.2
744
018
76R
ied
AT
RIE
13.4
848
.22
435
1872
Ferr
ara
ITFE
R11
.50
44.8
215
1865
Rije
ka-K
ozal
aH
RR
IJ14
.45
45.3
310
418
69Fi
renz
eIT
FIR
11.3
043
.80
7518
60R
iva
ITR
IV10
.83
45.8
873
1870
Form
azza
Pont
eIT
FOR
8.44
46.3
813
0019
13R
osen
heim
DE
RO
S12
.12
47.8
744
418
79Fr
eibu
rg/B
reis
gau
DE
FBG
7.83
48.0
030
018
69R
over
eto
ITR
OV
11.0
545
.87
206
1864
Frei
stad
tAT
FRE
14.5
048
.52
548
1878
Rov
igo
ITRV
G11
.75
45.0
59
1877
Gap
-Em
brun
FRG
AP
6.09
44.5
775
018
66Sa
intM
artin
d’H
eres
FRSM
H5.
7645
.20
212
1893
Gen
eve
CH
GN
V6.
1546
.20
405
1826
Sain
t-Pa
ul-L
es-D
uran
ceFR
SPA
5.76
43.7
129
618
82G
enov
aIT
GO
V9.
0044
.40
5318
34Sa
lzbu
rg-F
lugh
afen
AT
SAL
13.0
047
.80
450
1839
Gla
rus
CH
GLA
9.07
47.0
451
518
72Sa
med
anC
HSA
M9.
8846
.53
1705
1861
Gos
pic
HR
GO
S15
.38
44.5
357
318
73Sa
raje
wo
BA
SAR
18.4
343
.87
630
1880
Gra
ndfo
ntai
neFR
GFO
7.12
48.5
251
518
90Se
ckau
AT
SEK
14.7
847
.28
874
1891
Gra
z-U
nive
rsitat
AT
GR
A15
.45
47.0
837
718
37Si
beni
kH
RSI
B15
.92
43.7
377
1890
Hal
lau-
Loh
nC
HH
AL
8.46
47.7
045
018
64Si
onC
HSI
O7.
3746
.23
482
1861
Hei
ligen
blut
AT
HEI
12.8
547
.03
1242
1896
Sopr
onH
USO
P16
.60
47.6
823
418
65H
ohen
peiß
enbe
rgD
EH
OP
11.0
247
.80
986
1800
StG
alle
nC
HST
G9.
4047
.43
779
1864
(con
tinu
edov
erle
af)
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
156 I. AUER ET AL.Ta
ble
III.
(Con
tinu
ed)
Rec
entfu
llna
me
Cou
ntry
code
aA
cr.
x(°E)
y(°N
)A
ltitu
de(m
)St
art
Rec
entfu
llna
me
Cou
ntry
code
aA
cr.
x(°E)
y(°N
)A
ltitu
de(m
)St
art
Hur
bano
voSK
HU
R18
.20
47.8
712
418
71St
Pol
ten
AT
SPO
15.6
148
.18
285
1894
Hva
rH
RH
VR
16.4
343
.17
2018
58St
Seba
stia
nAT
SSB
15.3
147
.79
872
1884
Impe
ria
ITIM
P8.
0243
.87
5418
76St
a.M
aria
/Mus
tair
CH
STM
10.4
346
.60
1390
1901
Inns
bruc
k-U
nive
rsitat
AT
INN
11.3
847
.27
609
1858
Stra
sbou
rg-E
ntzh
eim
FRST
R7.
6448
.55
150
1803
Inte
rlak
enC
HIT
L7.
8746
.67
580
1890
Stut
tgar
t-Sc
hnar
renb
erg
DE
STU
9.20
48.8
331
418
07Iv
rea
ITIV
R7.
9145
.46
267
1837
Szom
bath
ely
HU
SZO
16.6
347
.27
221
1865
Jajc
eB
AJA
J17
.27
44.3
543
118
92Ta
msw
egAT
TAM
13.8
047
.13
1012
1880
Kal
sAT
KA
L12
.63
47.0
013
5018
96To
rino
ITTO
R7.
7545
.05
275
1803
Kar
lova
cH
RK
VA
15.5
545
.50
112
1872
Torino
Mon
calie
riIT
TO
M7.
7045
.00
267
1864
Kar
lsru
heD
EK
AR
8.35
49.0
311
218
01To
ulon
-La
Mitr
eFR
TO
U5.
9343
.11
2418
70K
eszt
hely
HU
KSZ
17.2
546
.75
115
1861
Tra
vnik
BA
TR
A17
.68
44.2
358
118
81K
lage
nfur
t-Fl
ugha
fen
AT
KLA
14.3
346
.65
459
1814
Tre
nto
ITTRT
11.1
246
.07
199
1864
Koc
evje
SIK
OC
14.8
745
.63
461
1872
Tries
teIT
TR
I13
.75
45.6
567
1841
Kol
lers
chla
gAT
KO
L13
.84
48.6
172
518
87Tuz
laB
ATU
Z18
.70
44.5
530
518
80K
onst
anz-
Mee
rsbu
rg-
Frie
dric
hsha
fen
DE
KM
F9.
1847
.67
443
1827
Udi
neIT
UD
I13
.20
46.0
051
1803
Kor
nat
AT
KO
R12
.89
46.6
910
4718
71U
lm-G
ieng
enD
EU
LM
9.95
48.3
856
718
22K
rem
sAT
KR
M15
.60
48.4
019
018
67Val
lom
bros
aIT
VA
L11
.00
43.7
295
518
72K
rem
smun
ster
AT
KR
E14
.13
48.0
538
918
20Ven
ezia
ITV
EN
12.2
545
.43
118
36K
rize
vci
HR
KR
I16
.55
46.0
315
518
73V
illac
hAT
VIL
13.8
746
.62
495
1887
Kuf
stei
nAT
KU
F12
.17
47.5
849
519
05V
isp
CH
VIS
7.84
46.3
064
019
01La
Cha
ux-D
e-Fo
nds
CH
CD
F6.
8047
.09
1018
1900
Vix
FRV
IX4.
5447
.91
205
1880
La
Cot
eSt
And
reFR
LC
A5.
2645
.36
340
1893
Wai
dhof
en/Y
bbs
AT
WA
I14
.76
47.9
542
118
96Lan
deck
AT
LA
D10
.57
47.1
378
518
87W
ien-
Hoh
eW
arte
AT
WIE
16.3
548
.22
209
1841
Lan
dshu
tD
ELH
U12
.10
48.5
339
318
79W
iene
rN
eust
adt
AT
WR
N16
.21
47.8
128
518
57Lan
gen
AT
LA
G10
.12
47.1
312
1818
81Zad
arH
RZA
D15
.22
44.1
35
1865
Lan
gnau
i.E.
CH
LIE
7.79
46.9
469
519
00Zag
reb-
Gric
HR
ZA
G15
.98
45.8
216
218
62Lan
gres
FRLG
R5.
3447
.85
467
1877
Zel
lam
See
AT
ZEL
12.7
847
.32
766
1875
Lem
ie-C
.le.
ITLEM
7.31
45.2
394
019
22Zer
mat
tC
HZER
7.75
46.0
316
3818
87Lie
nzAT
LIZ
12.8
146
.83
659
1854
Zur
ich
CH
ZU
R8.
5747
.38
569
1830
Lin
zAT
LIN
14.2
848
.30
263
1852
Zw
ettl-
Stift
AT
ZW
E15
.20
48.6
250
018
83
aC
ount
ryco
de,fu
llna
me
(no.
ofse
ries
).AT,A
ustria
(43)
;B
A,B
osni
aan
dH
erze
govi
na(9
);C
H,Sw
itzer
land
(31)
;C
Z,C
zech
oslo
vaki
a(1
);D
E,G
erm
any
(12)
;FR
,Fr
ance
(28)
;H
R,C
roat
ia(1
5);H
U,H
unga
ry(7
);IT
,Ital
y(4
0);SI
,Sl
oven
ia(4
);SK
,Sl
ovak
ia(2
).G
AR
tota
l:19
2.
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 157
Table IV. Outline statistics of breaks, outliers and gaps
Series 192
Available data (incl. filled gaps) (years) 26 063Available data (incl. filled gaps) (months) 312 756Mean length of series (years) 135.7
Breaks detected (total) 966Mean homogeneous subperiod (years) 22.7Mean breaks per station per year 0.037Square mean break (%) 17.9Maximum break (%) 238Mean break amplitude (%) 23.4
Corrected overshooting adjustments 1861
Real outliers detected 529
Filled gaps 14 927Mean gap rate (%) 4.8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
class borders of break magnitudes (%)
no. o
f cas
es (
966*
12)
-80
-60
-40
-20 0
20 40 60 80 100
-100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
no. o
f cas
es (
966)
class borders of amplitudes (%)
0 >0
10 5030 4020 60 70 80
>85
Figure 11. Frequency distributions of break magnitudes (left) and of break amplitudes (right). Both refer to the 966 detected and adjustedbreaks (later minus earlier as a percentage of earlier). Break amplitude is maximum monthly break minus monthly break of one event
The situation is different concerning outliers (Figure 14). The relative proportion of outliers with respect tothe number of stations shows a clear trend: starting with a high outlier frequency of every 3 to 10 years duringthe first 30 years, a smaller frequency of every 10 to 30 years during 1830 to 1900, and a low frequency ofone detected outlier approximately every 50 to 100 years after 1900. As the outlier detection capability of theprocedure also depends on the network density, a decreasing quality of the series, especially in terms of singlevalues, should be taken into account when analysing extreme events in the early decades of the 19th century.
Some outliers for individual months can exceed even several hundred percent. Most of the 529 real outliershad excessively high monthly totals, but 119 of them were wrong ‘zero-precipitation months’. They sometimesenter a dataset through a misinterpretation of a missing month as a dry month. Both categories of outliers, ifnot detected, would have severely affected any extreme-event statistics.
In 1861 (0.6% cases), homogenization produced overshooting adjustments (apparent outliers; see Section 5).It was possible to readjust these errors during the outlier detection and elimination procedure.
After having finished all corrections concerning breaks, overshooting effects and outliers, 4.8% of the312 756 individual monthly totals had to be reconstructed from nearby stations. The analysis of the missing
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
158 I. AUER ET AL.
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
ARE IT 1930ARE IT 1954ARE IT 1974%
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
BLU BA 1935BLU BA 1959BLU BA 1966%
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
BRX IT 1914BRX IT 1925BRX IT 1929BRX IT 1939BRX IT 1949BRX IT 1960%
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
ELM CH 1931ELM CH 1947ELM CH 1960ELM CH 1979%
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
INN AT 1865INN AT 1873INN AT 1890INN AT 1905INN AT 1948INN AT 1970%
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
Nov
GAP FR 1942GAP FR 1970GAP FR 1989%
Figure 12. Six examples illustrating typical annual courses of breaks (later minus earlier as a percentage of earlier) in the series ofArezzo (ARE), Banja Luka (BLU), Brixen/Bressanone (BRX), Elm (ELM), Innsbruck (INN) and Gap (GAP)
0
18016014012010080604020
200
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
02468101214161820
0.00
0.200.180.160.140.120.100.080.060.040.02no
. of b
reak
s pe
r st
atio
n
no. o
f sta
tions
no. of breaks
Figure 13. Time series of breaks detected per year. Left: absolute (versus annual number of series). Right: in relation to the respectivenumber of series available. Grey line and scale is the number of stations with data per year
data (Figure 15) shows for the first time (unlike Figures 13 and 14) the difficulties arising from politicalinstabilities. The first seven decades of the 19th century are characterized by a typical missing data ratenear 10%. Afterwards, missing data rates decreased in the late 19th and early 20th centuries (the time whenweather services reached their full capacity and Europe saw a long peaceful period). The two strong 20thcentury peaks of missing data of up to 16% (1920) and up to 23% (1945) are clearly linked to the two worldwars. The unfortunate increase in the 1990s is due mostly to the wars in the territory of the former Yugoslavia(see the historical review). The very recent increase is due to typical updating problems that arise in anyattempt at supranational data collection.
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 159
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
0
5
10
15
no. o
f sta
tions
no. of outliers
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
no. o
f out
liers
per
sta
tion
Figure 14. Time series of detected outliers per year. Left: absolute (versus annual number of series). Right: in relation to the respectivenumber of series available. Grey line and scale is the number of stations with data per year
0
50
100
150
200
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
missing m
onthsno. o
f sta
tions
0
5
10
15
20
25
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
annu
al g
ap r
ate
(%)
Figure 15. Time series of filled gaps. Left: absolute (versus annual number of series). Right: in relation to the respective number ofseries available (gap rate in percent)
An overall view of the effect of the whole process of quality improvement of the GAR precipitation seriesis represented in Figures 16 and 17. They show time series of the annual hom/ori ratios — the annual meanstogether with the +1 standard deviation curves and the absolute range. For the entire GAR (Figure 16), thestandard deviation curves span a range of approximately +0.1 (or 10%) around the curve of means in the20th century, with only a slightly increasing tendency in the 19th century. The full range of all hom/ori ratiosgoes from less than 0.6 up to 1.6 in extreme years. The absolute ranges of the smaller subregional (national)samples are slightly smaller. A closer look at the mean ratio curve of Figure 16 shows the existence of threemain systematic biases in the network that had to be adjusted.
Starting from the recent two decades (which constitute the reference period to which all earlier periodswere adjusted), all earlier periods back to the 1880s tend to be slightly lower than ‘1’. Hom/ori ratios below1 indicate that the original pre-1980s data generally had to be reduced by several percent to make themcomparable to the recent decades. The effect is strongest and almost continuous in the national subsample ofItaly, and smallest in Austria, Switzerland and France. The French subsample shows a long period from 1850to 1910 with systematically low original precipitation sums. In the SI-HR-BA subsample, the post World WarII period had to be reduced more strongly (5 to 10%) to make it comparable to recent decades. The majorityof the earlier years had negatively biased original data. Germany shows ratios <1 back to the 1930s. Fromthe 1890s to the 1920s the average ratio curve tends towards 1.0 again.
One possible explanation for the low pre-1980 ratios may be the recent trend towards automation (whichgenerally leads to larger measuring losses than manual methods). It can, however, only partially justify the
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
160 I. AUER ET AL.
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
hom
/ori-
ratio
all series
Figure 16. Time series of annual hom/ori ratios (bold: mean over all series; black-thin: +1 standard deviation; grey-thin: total range);sample: all 192 series
ratios curve, as automation was introduced in Italy only in the 1990s. It is also worth noticing that when theeffect of automation was studied quantitatively, as in Switzerland, it was estimated to be near 5% (Begertet al., 2003). Actually, the step around 1980 in the Italian ratios curve is not easy to explain, as Italian recordsunderwent a very complex evolution in the last 30 years (for most records, the data source changed in the1970s from UCEA to Servizio Idrografico), displaying a very high density of inhomogeneities, especiallyin the second half of the 1970s. Unfortunately, when most of the records of a geographical area displayproblems within a short time period, homogenization by intrastation comparison becomes very difficult andthe confidence of the results becomes low. The step around 1980 in the Italian ratios curve requires furtherstudy when national projects such as CLIMAGRI (see www.climagri.it) make available a larger number ofItalian precipitation records.
In Austria, automation began during the 1980s, but all automatic stations of the GAR network wereadditionally equipped with manual gauges in order to eliminate cases with large deficiencies.
Going further back in time, an interesting period arises in the 1860s, 1870s and 1880s, whereby a generalnegative bias of 5 to 10% of the average GAR hom/ori ratios is shown. A look at the national subsamples(Figure 17) indicates that it is mainly the Swiss and German series that are responsible for this effect, andto a much smaller extent the French subsample. In Italy, Austria and in the SI-HR-BA region it does notexist. The systematic reduction of the overly high original data required to make them comparable to the1980s and 1990s was a matter of intensive discussion among the Swiss and the Austrian groups involved inthe study. The provisional decision to treat the effect as real was supported by station history data from theGrand Duchy of Baden. The 1888 yearbook of Baden (Table II, source no. 16) indicates (on pages 45–50)that a complete replacement of all old rain gauges (called ‘Swiss type’) with new instruments of ‘Hellmanntype’ was introduced over the 2 years, 1887 and 1888. Two years of comparative measurements at all sitesin Baden resulted in extremely large differences in the catches of the two types of an order of 20% to morethan 30%, with the old (Swiss) gauge catching more precipitation.
According to MeteoSwiss, the old type was also replaced in Switzerland at that time. However, parallelmeasurements performed in Zurich resulted in lower differences. Eventually, it was decided to apply theresults of the parallel measurements to all of the Baden series (Figure 18). The Swiss series were not directlycorrected, but the station history information was kept in mind during the homogenization process and inthe assessment of the station comparisons. Concluding what has been said about the strange 1860s to 1880shom/ori ratios in certain subregions in southwestern Germany, the solution adopted as described can beconsidered as likely, but not certain, to have overcome the problems in the 1860s to 1880s German and Swissdata. Here, as in the very early period, the additional inclusion of proxy climatic information (e.g. from treerings) might provide some improvements in the future (Bohm, 2003), and this concept will be explored as part
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 161
AT series
DE series
IT series
CH series
FR series
SI-HR-BA series
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Figure 17. Subregional time series of annual hom/ori ratios (bold: mean over all series; black-thin: +1 standard deviation; grey-thin:total range) of regional subsamples for Austria, Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy and the combined Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia
and Herzegovina (SI-HR-BA)
of the working programme of a current international research project focused on the study region (ALP-IMP2003–2006 Project, 2003).
The third period with systematically biased original precipitation data is that of the first decades of the earlyinstrumental period in the early 19th century. In the first three decades (1800–1830) the annual means hadto be increased by approximately 10% to make them comparable to recent data. After 1830 the adjustmentsdropped, but an average value of roughly +5% is still visible in the GAR mean of Figure 16. The effectis present (although scattered due to the low network density) in all national subsamples (Figure 17) thatextend that far into the past. The adjustments applied to the early data are greater than those of the two
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
162 I. AUER ET AL.
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
1800
1820
1840
1860
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
mm
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
mm
Freiburg (DE) Karlsruhe (DE)
Figure 18. Two examples from the Grand Duchy of Baden for the artificial ‘1860s to 1880s peak’ in the original annual precipitationseries (bold, grey) versus the homogenized series (thin, black) caused by the use of the ‘old Swiss’ gauge type
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
Strasbourg (FR)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Regensburg (DE)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Brno (CZ)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Marseille (FR)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600Torino (IT)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600Milano (IT)
Figure 19. Six examples of annual precipitation series of the HISTALP dataset
other periods. A long-term and wide-ranging 10% adjustment is comparable to the decadal-scale climaticvariations and has a strong influence on any medium- and long-term trends. Therefore, it should be checkedcarefully and discussed before taken as credible. Taking into account the difficulties concerning networkdensity versus decorrelation distances (homogenizing principles 2 and 3), the systematic early adjustmentsmay well be artefacts of inadmissible long-range information exchange among less-well-correlated series. Thereason why the final decision in favour of accepting the results from relative homogeneity testing was takencame from the strong support from metadata. The comparison of the early adjustment curve in Figure 16 with
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 163
the mean evolution of the height above ground of the rain gauges (Figure 10) shows a strong similarity. Allgauge intercomparison activities (overview in Sevruk (1986)) agree on one point, i.e. measured deficits frommost gauge types increase with increasing wind speed. Also, the parallel measurements for sites in the GAR(examples in Figure 7) clearly support these findings and also show how large the wind-induced bias is forrooftop, platform or tower installations. Therefore, we believe that the strong positive adjustments applied tothe early original series should be taken as the most likely for the time being. In the near future, comparisonswith proxy data (ALP-IMP 2003–2006 Project, 2003) will either further support the decision or not.
7. SOME INITIAL TIME SERIES PLOTS, CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
Six examples of annual series in Figure 19 (geographically selected from the 36 pre-1850 series) convey afirst feeling for the internal variability of precipitation within a relatively small region like the 724 000 km2 ofthe GAR (0.5% of the Earth’s land surface, 7% of Europe). Unlike temperature (for which Bohm et al. (2001)could show a high degree of uniform long-term trends in the GAR), the precipitation series show considerableinterannual variability, as well as potentially important variability on decadal and even centennial scales. Afurther six examples of seasonal series in Figure 20 (pairs of summer–winter or summer–autumn series)illustrate different, often contrasting, seasonal trends as well.
The purpose of this paper has been to detail all the processes involved in the construction of the 192monthly series that make up the precipitation database for the GAR. Many of the steps were laborious,with several exchanges between the various institutes necessary to determine the reasons for some of thehomogeneity breaks discovered and whether the outliers detected were real or due to incorrect units or
0
600
500
400
300
200
100
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
mm
mm
mm
6 to 8 12 to 2
Ulm (DE)
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
600
500
400
300
200
100
mm
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
600
500
400
300
200
100
6 to 8
9 to 11
Hvar (HR)
mm
Kremsmünster (AT)
6 to 8 12 to 2
mm
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
600
500
400
300
200
100
Klagenfurt (AT)
6 to 8 12 to 2
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
800
700
600
400
500
300
200
100
Orange (FR)
6 to 8 9 to 11
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
0
800900
100011001200
700600
400500
300200100
Genova (IT)
6 to 8 9 to 11
Figure 20. Six examples of seasonal precipitation series of the HISTALP dataset (note: reduced scale for two series, also 6–8 is Juneto August, etc.)
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
164 I. AUER ET AL.
transcription problems. The final database is considered reliable back to 1840, but it is only the best thatcan currently be achieved for the first 40 years, given the density of gauge sites available and the sometimesserious lack of metadata. It is hoped that homogeneity adjustments might be revisited for this early period inthe light of the many proxy records (tree rings, ice cores and historical documents) that are being collectedas part of the ALP-IMP project.
The most serious problem with the network is associated with the rapid change in gauge height aboveground, from the mid-19th century standard of gauges at the top of towers to the 20th century standard ofgauges at near-ground levels. This has meant that homogeneity adjustments of increases up to 30–50%, andsometimes more in winter, have had to be applied to most series. Sometimes, this has had to be done basedsolely on metadata information, as all gauges were almost simultaneously relocated to near-ground positionsin some countries/states during the late-19th century.
All the adjustments applied throughout the 200 years were based on homogeneity studies and detailedmetadata. Adjustments are only appropriate at the monthly and seasonal time scales. We believe that even ifthe daily data for the 192 series in the network could be recovered and digitized, adjustment of the daily seriesfor homogeneity would be difficult, if not impossible, because the network is not dense enough. Adjustments,for example, are likely to be larger if the precipitation were snow than if it were rain, and even when allrain they are likely to be strongly affected by wind strength. Homogenization of daily precipitation series,therefore, requires not only a greater density of gauges, but also much more information about other climaticvariables at the daily time scale. New approaches will have to be developed for this time scale if long-termchanges in extreme precipitation totals over the last 200 years are to be studied.
The dataset is available from the Website of the ALP-IMP project. Two additional papers are in development;these will (1) compare the dataset with existing precipitation datasets at the global, European and alpine scaleand (2) analyse the database to determine coherent regions of precipitation variability across the GAR.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We express our thanks to the more than 1000 observers involved in measuring the precipitation data overthe last two centuries. Data processing and analysis were supported by funding from a number of past andongoing national and international projects: CLIVALP (Austrian FWF, P1576-N06), CLIMAGRI (Italian CNRSpecial Project 02- 02/05/97- 037681) and ALP-IMP (EU, EVK2-2001-00241). We also want to thank thetwo anonymous reviewers for making helpful comments and suggestions.
REFERENCES
Aguilar E, Auer I, Brunet M, Peterson TC, Wieringa J. 2003. Guidelines on climate metadata and homogenization. World ClimateProgramme Data and Monitoring WCDMP-No. 53. WMO-TD No. 1186, WMO, Geneva.
Alexandersson H. 1986. A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. Journal of Climate 6: 661–675.Alexandersson H, Moberg A. 1997. Homogenization of Swedish temperature data, part I: a homogeneity test for linear trends.
International Journal of Climatology 7: 1001–1013.ALP-IMP 2003–2006 Project. 2003. Multi-centennial climate variability in the Alps based on instrumental data, model simulations and
proxy data. EU-FP5, EVK2-CT-2002-00 148. www.zamg.ac.at/ALP-IMP (access for the whole project duration).Anon. 1783. Ephemerides Societatis Meteorologicae Palatinae, Historia et Observationes, vol. 1. Typographische Gesellschaftsdruckerey:
Mannheim.Aschwanden A, Beck M, Haberli C, Haller G, Kiene M, Roesch A, Sie R, Stutz M. 1996a. Bereinigte Zeitreihen — Die Ergebnisse des
Projekts Klima90, Band. 1: Auswertungen. In Klimatologie der Schweiz (Jahrgang 1996). Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt:Zurich.
Aschwanden A, Beck M, Haberli C, Haller G, Kiene M, Roesch A, Sie R, Stutz M. 1996b. Bereinigte Zeitreihen — Die Ergebnissedes Projekts Klima90, Band. 2: Methoden. In Klimatologie der Schweiz (Jahrgang 1996). Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt:Zurich.
Attmannspacher W. 1981. 200 Jahre Meteorologische Beobachtungen auf dem Hohenpeißenberg 1781–1980. Berichte des DeutschenWetterdienstes 155. Selbstverlag des Deutschen Wetterdienstes: Offenbach am Main.
Auer I. 1992. Precipitation measurements in a high alpine region — inter-comparisons of different measuring systems. TECO 92,WMO/TD 462; 251–256.
Auer I. 1993. Niederschlagsschwankungen in Osterreich seit Beginn der instrumentellen Beobachtungen durch die Zentralanstalt furMeteorologie und Geodynamik . In Osterreichische Beitrage zu Meteorologie und Geophysik 7. Zentralanstalt fur Meteorologie undGeodynamik, Wien.
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
PRECIPITATION DATASET: EUROPEAN GREATER ALPINE REGION 165
Auer I, Schoner W. 2001. The reliability of precipitation measurements at high mountains — amounts in dependence of instruments andsites. In Proceedings of the Third Seminar for Homogenisation and Quality Control in Climatological Databases, 25–29 September,2000. http://omsz.met.hu/ismeretterjesztes/rendezvenyek/homogen3 (February 2004).
Auer I, Bohm R, Schoner W, Hagen M. 1999. ALOCLIM — Austrian — Central European Long-term Climate — creation of amultiple homogenized long-term climate data-set. In Proceedings of the Second Seminar for Homogenisation of Surface ClimatologicalData. Budapest, 9–13 November 1998, WCDMP 41, WMO-TD 962, WMO; 47–71.
Auer I, Bohm R, Schoner W. 2001. Austrian long-term climate 1767–2000 — multiple instrumental climate time series from centralEurope. In Osterreichische Beitrage zu Meteorologie und Geophysik 25. Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna.
Authority of the Meteorological Committee. 1874. Report of the Proceedings of the Meteorological Congress at Vienna, Protocols andAppendices translated from the official report. E. Stanford, Charing Cross, London.
Begert M, Seiz G, Schlegel T, Musa M, Baudraz G, Moesch M. 2003. Homogenisierung von Klimamessreihen der Schweiz undBestimmung der Normwerte 1961–1990 — Schlussbericht des Projekts NORM90. Veroffentlichungen MeteoSchweiz 67.
Bellume M, Maugeri M, Mazzucchelli E. 1998. Due secoli di osservazioni meteorologiche a Mantova. CO.DI.MA., Mantova.Bohm R. 2003. Instrumental climate data. PAGES-News 11(2–3): 9–10.Bohm R, Auer I, Brunetti M, Maugeri M, Nanni T, Schoner W. 2001. Regional temperature variability in the European Alps 1760–1998
from homogenized instrumental time series. International Journal of Climatology 21: 1779–1801.Brunetti M, Maugeri M, Nanni T. 2000a. Variations of temperature and precipitation in Italy from 1866 to 1995. Theoretical and Applied
Climatology 65: 165–174.Brunetti M, Buffoni L, Maugeri M, Nanni T. 2000b. Precipitation intensity trends in northern Italy. International Journal of Climatology
20: 1017–1031.Brunetti M, Buffoni L, Lo Vecchio G, Maugeri M, Nanni T. 2001. Tre Secoli di Meteorologia a Bologna. Edizioni CUSL: Bologna.Buffoni L, Chlistovsky F. 1992. Precipitatzioni Giornaliere Rilevate all’Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera in Milano dal 1835 al 1990.
Edi-ermes: Milano.Buffoni L, Maugeri M, Nanni T. 1999. Precipitation in Italy from 1833 to 1996. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 63: 33–40.Craddock JM. 1979. Methods of comparing annual rainfall records for climatic purposes. Weather 34: 332–346.DHMZ. 1998. 50 years of work of Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia 1947–1997. DHMZ, Zagreb.DHMZ. 2002. 150 years of meteorological observations in Croatia. DHMZ, Zagreb.Di Napoli G. 1996. Tre secoli di clima a Torino: stato dei lavori. Nimbus 13–14: 30–31.Eredia F. 1908. Le precipitazioni atmosferiche in Italia dal 1880 al 1905. In Annali dell’Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia, Serie II, 27,
anno 1905, Rome.Eredia F. 1919. Osservazioni pluviometriche raccolate a tutto l’anno 1915 dal R. Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia e Geodinamica.
Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici, Rome.Eredia F. 1925. Osservazioni pluviometriche raccolate nel quinquennio 1916–1920 dal R. Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia e
Geodinamica. Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici, Rome.Fliri F. 1998. Naturchronik von Tirol. Beitrage zur Klimatographie von Tirol. Universitatsverlag Wagner, Innsbruck.Herzog J, Muller-Westermeier G. 1998. Homogenitatsprufung und Homogenisierung klimatologischer Meßreihen im Deutschen
Wetterdienst. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes 202. Selbstverlag des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, Offenbach am Main.Hulme M. 1994. Validation of large-scale precipitation fields in general circulation models. In Global Precipitations and Climate Change,
Desbois M, Desalmand F (eds). NATO ASI Series. Series I: Global Environmental Change, vol. 26. Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 387–405.Hungarian Meteorological Service. 1997. Proceedings of the First Seminar for Homogenisation of Surface Climatological Data , Budapest,
6–12 October 1996. Keszult a MET-DRUCK nyomdaban, Budapest.Hungarian Meteorological Service. 2001. Proceedings of the Third Seminar for Homogenisation and Quality Control in Climatological
Databases , 25–29 September, 2000. http://omsz.met.hu/ismeretterjesztes/rendezvenyek/homogen3 (Accessed February 2004).Jones PD, Moberg A. 2003. Hemispheric and large-scale surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to
2001. Journal of Climate. 16: 206–223.Katusin Z. 1994. Meteorological stations network in Croatia. Hrvatski Meteoroloski Casopis (Croatian Meteorological Journal) 29:
47–56.Kington JA. 1974. The Societas Meteorologica Palatina: an eighteenth century meteorological society. Weather 29: 416–426.Liznar J. 1886. Uber das Klima von Brunn. Sonder-Abdruck aus dem XXIV. Bande der Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines
in Brunn.Luksic I. 1996. Meteoroloski podaci iz Hrvatske. Meteorologija za Korisnike, Penzar B i suradnici. (Meteorological data from Croatia.
In Meteorology for Users, Penzar B and collaborators.), Skolska knjiga i Hrvatsko meteorolosko drustvo: 225–249.Maugeri M, Bellume M, Buffoni L, Chlistovsky F. 1998. Reconstruction of daily pressure maps over Italy during some extreme events
of the 19th century. Il Nuovo Cimento C 21: 135–147.Maurer J, Billwiller Jr R, Heß C. 1909. Das Klima der Schweiz: Auf Grundlage der 37jahrigen Beobachtungsperiode 1864–1900.
Kommissionsverlag von Huber & Co.: Frauenfeld.Mestre O. 1999. Step by step procedures for choosing a model with change-points. In Proceedings of the Second Seminar for
Homogenisation of Surface Climatological Data. Budapest, 9–13 November 1998, WCDMP 41, WMO-TD 962, WMO; 15–26.Millosevich E. 1882. Sulla distribuzione della pioggia in Italia. In Annali dell’Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia, Serie II 3, anno 1881,
Rome.Millosevich E. 1885. Appendice alla memoria sulla pioggia in Italia. In Annali dell’Ufficio Centrale di Meteorologia, Serie II 5, anno
1883, Rome.Mohorovicic A. 1902. Meteoroloske postaje u Hrvatskoj i Slavoniji od god. 1853. Godisnje izvjesce Zagrebackog meteoroloskog
observatorija 1901 (Meteorological stations in Croatia and Slavonia from 1853, Annual report of Meteorological Observatory inZagreb 1901), Zagreb; 4–14.
Moisselin JM, Schneider M, Canellas C, Mestre O. 2002. Changements climatiques en France au 20eme siecle. Etude des longues seriesde donnees homogeneisees francaises de precipitations et temperatures. La Meteorologie 38: 45–56.
Penzar I, Juras J, Marki A. 1992. Long-term meteorological measurements at Zagreb: 1862–1990. Geofizika 9: (suppl. Zagreb).
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)
166 I. AUER ET AL.
Peterson TC, Easterling DR, Karl TR, Groisman P, Auer I, Bohm R, Plummer N, Nicholis N, Torok S, Vincent L, Tuomenvirta H,Salinger J, Førland EJ, Hanssen-Bauer I, Alexandersson H, Jones P, Parker D. 1998. Homogeneity adjustments of in situ climatedata: a review. International Journal of Climatology 18: 1493–1517.
Potzmann R. 1999. Data control and visualisation with a desktop GIS. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Experienceswith Automatic Weather Stations ICEAWS 1999, 27–29 September, Vienna, Austria. Osterreichische Beitrage zu Meteorologie undGeophysik 20. Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austria (CD-ROM).
Romano F, Mercalli L. 1994. L’Osservatorio meteorologico di Cuneo: dal 1877 “sentinella” della Granda. Nimbus 3: 8–15.Rudolf B, Simmer C. 2003. Niederschlag, Starkregen und Hochwasser. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus dem Institut fur Meteorologie
der Universitat Leipzig. Sonderheft zum Jahr der Geowissenschaften; 27–43.Scheifinger H, Bohm R, Auer I. 2003. Raumliche Dekorrelation von Klimazeitreihen unterschiedlicher zeitlicher Auflosung und ihre
Bedeutung fur ihre Homogenisierbarkeit und die Reprasentativitat von Ergebnissen. 6. Deutsche Klimatagung, Klimavariabilitat 2003,22–25, September 2003, Potsdam. Terra Nostra, Schriftenreihe der Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung 2003/6: 375–379.
Schmidli J, Frei C, Schar C. 2001. Reconstruction of mesoscale precipitation fields from sparse observations in complex terrain. Journalof Climate 14: 3289–3306.
Schmidli J, Schmutz C, Frei C, Wanner H, Schar C. 2002. Mesoscale precipitation variability in the region of the European Alps duringthe 20th century. International Journal of Climatology 22: 1049–1074.
Schonwiese CD. 1985. Praktische Statistik fur Meteorologen und Geowissenschaftler. Gebruder Borntrager: Berlin.Schuepp M. 1964. 100 Jahre schweizerisches Beobachtungsnetz 1864–1963. Separatdruck aus der Jubilaumsschrift “Hundert Jahre
Meteorologie in der Schweiz 1864–1963”.SMA. 1981. 100 Jahre Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt 1881–1981. Festschrift zum hundertjahrigen Bestehen der
schweizerischen Meteorologischen Anstalt. Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt, Zurich.Sevruk B (ed.). 1986. Corrections of Precipitation Measurements. WMO/IAHS/ETH Workshop on Correction of Precipitation
Measurements. Zurich, Switzerland, 1–3 Apr. 1985. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zentrum: Zurich.Szalai S, Szentimrey T (eds). 2004. Proceedings of the 4th Seminar for Homogenisation and Quality Control in Climatological Data
Bases , Budapest, 6–10 October 2003. WCDMP 56, WMO-TD 1236. WMO: Geneva.Szalai S, Szentimrey T, Szinell C (eds). 1999. Proceedings of the Second Seminar for Homogenisation of Surface Climatological Data.
Budapest, 9–13 Nov. 1998 , WCDMP 41, WMO-TD 962. WMO, Geneva.Szentimrey T. 1997. Statistical procedure for joint homogenisation of climate time series. In Proceedings of the First seminar for
Homogenisation of Surface Climatological Data, Budapest, 6–12 October 1996. Hungarian Meteorological Service, Keszult a MET-DRUCK nyomdaban, Budapest; 47–62.
Szentimrey T. 1999. Multiple analysis of series for homogenisation (MASH). In Proceedings of the Second seminar for Homogenisationof Surface Climatological Data, Budapest, 9–13 November 1998, WCDMP 41, WMO-TD 962. WMO, Geneva; 27–46.
Szentimrey T. 2001. Multiple analysis of series for homogenization (MASH), seasonal application of MASH (SAM), automatic usingof meta data. In Proceedings of the Third Seminar for Homogenization and Quality Control in Climatological Databases, Budapest,Hungary, 25–29 September, 2000. http://omsz.met.hu/ismeretterjesztes/rendezvenyek/homogen3 (Accessed February 2004).
Ungersbock M, Orlik A, Jurkovic A. 2003. HISTALP — eine Datenbank zur kombinierten Erfassung von historischen Klimazeitreihenund deren Metadaten. Terra Nostra, Schriftenreihe der Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung. 2003/6: 450–452.
Vose RS, Schmoyer RL, Steurer PM, Peterson TC, Heim R, Karl TR, Eischeid J. 1992. The Global Historical Climatology Network:long-term monthly temperature, precipitation, sea level pressure, and station pressure data. ORNL/CDIAC-53, NDP-041. CarbonDioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Copyright 2005 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 25: 139–166 (2005)