Chapman CSP First Year paper Rubric€¦ · Project has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol

Chapman CSP First Year paper Rubric

Name: Novice Apprentice Artisan

Date: 64-67 68-71 72-79 80

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Paper is missing important required elements.

Paper has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol.

Paper has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol.

Paper has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol.

The paper meets all the standards listed to the left but also makes creative and effective use of stylistic elements, such as choice of words, fluency, metaphorical language. The paper is fluid and truly interesting to read.

Quality of written communication

Paper has some but not all the criteria to the right.

Few, if any mistakes in APA style.

Consistent use of correct writing conventions – errors do not inhibit the reader’s from understanding.

The writing is easy to read. The logic of the paper is explicit and is easy to track by the reader. The transitions lead the reader from one section to another.

Most but not all the elements to

the right.

Consistent use of APA style.

The surface features of the paper enhance the reader’s understanding and facilitate communication of its main ideas. The writing flows well and is interesting to read.

Program Goals/Claims Written

communication Professional Standards

Data-based decision making and accountability

Socialization an development of life skills

Prevention, crisis intervention and mental health

Information technology

The topic clearly relates to children’s mental health and social and emotional development but the range of prevention and treatment options is not extensive. Evidence is gathered from several electronic databases. Varied evidence is adequately presented but is sometimes inconsistent, vague or needing more detail. The author clearly summarizes the main themes of relevant research so that they are clear to a reader unfamiliar to the topic. The paper works for its intended audience. Most technical terms and professional jargon are explained in a way that can be easily understood by novices.

The topic clearly relates to children’s mental health and social and emotional development. The paper clearly and strongly connects its topic with a three-tiered model and allows the discussion of a range of prevention and treatment options. Evidence is gathered from several electronic databases. The author uses specific, varied, and detailed evidence with an emphasis on data-driven peer-reviewed articles. The main themes of the relevant research are explained in a way that is compelling to the reader. The paper works well for newcomers to the profession. Technical terms and professional jargon are clearly explained in a way that can be easily read by novices who are learning about the topic for the first time.

Preparedness to be a professional

Paper does not yet reflect the depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work.

Paper reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is on track.

Paper reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation that would be considered strong for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing well.

Paper reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing very well.

Paper reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that far exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness exceeds expectation.

CHAPMAN CSP 512 INTERVIEW PROJECT RUBRIC


Date: Below 24 24 25 to 26 27 to 29 30

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Project is missing important

required elements

Project has most of the

required elements in the

assignment protocol

Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment

protocol including:

1. Cover page 2. Table of Contents.

3. Introduction to client

4. 3 session essays 5. Session Rating Scale, interview Skills Rating Form, and

feedback forms from group meetings for each session.

6. Summary essay 7. Appendixes

8. Session notes

9. Consent form

Session Essays cover the topics below:

1. Summarizes the session step-by-step. 2. Summarizes responses to the Interview Skills Rating

Form

3. Summarizes client's responses to the Session Rating Scale.

4. Reflects on what did you think and feel when you read

the SRS. 5. Reflects on what did you do well.

6. Reflects on how do you know what you did was helpful

to the client. 7. Reflects on what you need to do more of in the next

session.

8. Summarizes how you will prepare yourself to make these changes.

9. Reflects on how this will make a difference in the next

session Summary essay covers the topics below:

1. Describes how these sessions demonstrate what you

have learned this semester, your development as a counselor, and what you perceive as your next steps.

2. Your ability to manage the flow of the interview, elicit

content, respond empathetically, and shift direction as needed.

The project meets all the

standards listed to the left but

also makes creative and effective use of stylistic

elements, such as choice of

words, fluency, and metaphorical language. The

project is fluid and truly

interesting to read.

The student shows exceptional skill at conducting a solution-

focused interview.

3. Changes in your comfort level over the three interviews,

over the semester and over the year. 4. Which experiences were most helpful to you, how they

were helpful, and what you learned about yourself as a

counselor? 5. What further training or experience could you seek to

enhance your abilities?

Quality of written communication and reflections.

Writing is inconsistent. Errors in conventions hinder the reader from

Consistent use of correct writing conventions – errors do

not inhibit the reader’s from

understanding.

The writing is easy to read. The logic of the project is explicit

and is easy to track by the

reader. The transitions lead the reader from one section to

another

The surface features of the project enhance the reader’s

understanding and facilitate

communication of its main ideas. The writing flows well

and is interesting to read.

Program Goals/Claims

Written communication

Reflection

Professional Standards

Consultation and

Collaboration

Prevention, Crisis

Intervention, and Mental Health

Essays are missing pieces and/or

do not have enough detail or depth

to adequately capture the sessions and the student’s experience.

Reflections and feedback from

listening to session recordings indicate student has difficulty

conducting a solution-focused

interview, e.g., they have difficulty with skills-for-not-knowing such as

summarizing, reflecting key words,

etc. The student gives direct advice when it is not appropriate.

Essays cover all the topics

above. Details are sometimes

missing and the reflections are sometimes superficial.


listening to session recordings suggest student can conduct a

solution focused interview

project as but uses a limited number of skills, e.g., uses

adequate skills-for not-

knowing but is unable to collaborative set goals or

develop tasks.

Essays include all elements

above. Summaries and

reflections have less detail and depth than a 4 or 5




project as demonstrated by use of skills-for-not-knowing, future

focused questions, collaborative

goal setting, and development of appropriate client tasks.

Essay touches on all elements

to above. Essays have good

detail and reflections show insight and new learning.




project as demonstrated by use of skills-for-not-knowing,

future focused questions,

collaborative goal setting, and development of appropriate

client tasks. Feedback from

peer reviews suggest student has mastered these skills and

can make use of them in a

flexible way that responds to clients’ unique needs and

circumstances


Project does not yet reflect the depth of knowledge and quality of

presentation appropriate for this

level of graduate e work.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of

presentation appropriate for

this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional

preparedness is on track.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of

presentation that would be

considered strong for this level of graduate e work. Progress

toward professional

preparedness is progressing well.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of

presentation that exceeds

expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward

professional preparedness is

progressing very well.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of

presentation that far exceeds

expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress

toward professional

preparedness exceeds expectation.

CHAPMAN CSP GROUP COUNSELING PROJECT RUBRIC


Date: 20-23 24-26 27-29 30

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Project is missing important required elements

Project has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol

Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol


The project meets all the standards listed to the left but also makes creative and effective use of stylistic elements, such as inclusion of activities. The project binder is fluid and truly interesting to read.


Project has some but not all the criteria to the right

Few, if any grammatical mistakes

Consistent use of correct writing conventions – errors do not inhibit the reader’s from understanding

The writing is easy to read The logic of the documents is explicit and is easy to track by the reader

Most but not all the elements to the right

Consistent use correct grammar, including APA style when appropriate

The surface features of the project enhance the reader’s understanding and facilitate communication of its main ideas The writing flows well and is interesting to read

The project meets all standards listed to the left and writing is exceptionally sophisticated




Consultation and collaboration


Research and Program Evaluation



The intervention clearly relates to children’s mental health and social and emotional development but the activities and topics suggested do not adequately meet best practices The intervention is organized and mostly tailored for the population/members described. Empirical evidence is presented but does not necessarily match the activities utilized Forms created for the purpose of the project are acceptable for educational purposes, but do not adhere to all ethical and professional guidelines Reflections are mostly clear,, and indicate understanding of some areas for growth in the area of group counseling. However, some needed areas are not fully addressed Program efficacy is measured and described. Evaluation procedures are adequate and results are correctly interpreted


The intervention clearly demonstrates best practices in children’s mental health and social and emotional development. The intervention is well-organized and well-tailored for the population/members described. Additionally, clear empirical evidence supports the type of activities implemented Forms created for the purpose of the project are clear, follow best practices, and adhere to legal and ethical standards Reflections are clear, practical, and indicate solid understanding of areas for growth in the area of group counseling Program efficacy is clearly and efficiently measured and described. Results are correctly interpreted. Evaluation procedures are comprehensive and limitations are clearly noted


Project does not yet reflect the depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate work

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is on track.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation that would be considered strong for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing well

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing very well

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that far exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness exceeds expectation

CHAPMAN CSP SYSTEMS CHANGE PROJECT RUBRIC

Name:_________________________ Novice Apprentice Artisan

CSP 618 CSP 641

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Project is missing important required elements

Project has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol


Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol and other relevant data.

The project meets all the standards listed to the left but also makes creative and effective use of stylistic elements, such as inclusion of activities. The project binder is fluid and truly interesting to read.



Few, if any grammatical mistakes

Consistent use of correct writing conventions – errors do not inhibit the reader’s from understanding

The writing is easy to read

The logic of the documents is explicit and is easy to track by the reader


Consistent use correct grammar, including APA style when appropriate

The surface features of the project enhance the reader’s understanding and facilitate communication of its main ideas

The writing flows well and is interesting to read

The project meets all standards listed to the left and writing is exceptionally well written




Consultation and collaboration


Research and Program Evaluation



The project clearly relates to children’s social and emotional and/or academic development but the project does not adequately meet best practices The intervention is organized and mostly tailored for the population/members described. Empirical evidence is presented but does not necessarily match the activities utilized Forms created for the purpose of the project are acceptable for educational purposes, but do not adhere to all ethical and professional guidelines Data presented are mostly clear, and indicate understanding of some areas of data-based decision making. However, some needed areas are not fully addressed Program efficacy is measured and described. Evaluation procedures are adequate and results are correctly interpreted


The change project clearly demonstrates best practices in children’s mental health and social and emotional and/or academic development. The project is well-organized and well-tailored for the population/members described. Additionally, clear empirical evidence supports the type of activities implemented Forms created for the purpose of the project are clear, follow best practices, and adhere to legal and ethical standards Data presented are clear, practical, and indicate solid understanding of data-based decision making Program evaluation is clearly and efficiently measured and described. Results are correctly interpreted. Evaluation procedures are comprehensive and limitations are clearly noted


Project does not yet reflect the depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate work

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is on track.

Project reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation that would be considered strong for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing well

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing very well

Project reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that far exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness exceeds expectation

CSP 616 Program evaluation Rubric

Novice Apprentice Artisan

1 2 3 4 5

Contents: Complete

Program evaluation contains little of the required materials

Program evaluation contains some of the required materials

Program evaluation contains most of the required materials

Program evaluation contains all of the required materials

Program evaluation contains more than the required materials

Quality of Products: Well presented

Organization, writing, and other content of the documents and artifacts do not meet requirements and expectations

Organization, writing, and other content of the documents and artifacts minimally meet requirements and expectations

Organization, writing, and other content of the documents and artifacts meet requirements and expectations very well

Organization, writing, and other content of the documents and artifacts somewhat exceed requirements and expectations

Organization, writing, and other content of nearly all of the documents and artifacts substantially exceed requirements and expectations

Professional Standards (A): Reflects acquisition of professional standards in the understanding of systems effects.

Program evaluation artifacts insufficiently document acquisition of professional standards.

Program evaluation artifacts document some acquisition of most professional standards.

Program evaluation artifacts document adequate and sufficient acquisition of all professional standards.

Program evaluation artifacts document competent and sufficient acquisition of all professional standards.

Program evaluation artifacts document proficient and sufficient acquisition of many professional standards.

Professional Standards (B): Reflects acquisition of professional standards in program evaluation.

Program evaluation artifacts document insufficient acquisition of professional standards

Program evaluation artifacts document some acquisition of most professional standards

Program evaluation artifacts document adequate and sufficient acquisition of all professional standards

Program evaluation artifacts document competent and sufficient acquisition of all professional standards

Program evaluation artifacts document proficient and sufficient acquisition of all professional standards

CES Program Completion

Name: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Semester: ________________________________ SC: ____________

SP:________________

CSP 640 Case consultation Rubric

Novice Apprentice Artisan

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Case is missing important required elements

Case has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol

Case has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol

CASE has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol and additional pertinent information.

The paper meets all the standards listed to the left but also makes effective use of stylistic elements, such as choice of words, fluency. The case is interesting to read.


CASE has some but not all the criteria to the right

Consistent use of correct writing conventions – errors do not inhibit the reader’s from understanding.

The writing is easy to read. The logic of the case is explicit and is easy to track by the reader.


Each of the sections of the case are well written and organized so that the reader easily understands the data elements of that part of the case. The writing flows well and is interesting to read.


Case does not yet reflect the depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work.

Case reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation appropriate for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is on track.

Case reflects a depth of knowledge and quality of presentation that would be considered strong for this level of graduate e work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing well.

Case reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness is progressing very well.

Case reflects a depth of knowledge end quality of presentation that far exceeds expectations for this level of graduate work. Progress toward professional preparedness exceeds expectation.

Name: ____________________________________________________________________ Semester: ___________________________________________ SC:________________________

SP: _____________________

CHAPMAN CSP 500 RESILIENCE PROJECT RUBRIC


Date: Below 48 48 50 to 53 54 to 59 60

1 2 3 4 5

Content of assignment Project is missing important

required elements

Project has most of the

required elements in the

assignment protocol

Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment

protocol including:

1) Qualitative research paper we suggest the following structure:

i) Introduction to resiliency and your research

question

ii) Literature review

iii) Methodology

(1) Describe how you gathered the data.

(2) Background of interviewees

(a) Findings:

(b) Sources of individual or inner strength

and resilience.

(c) Sources of social support (family,

school, and community)

(d) Turning points.

(e) Cultural messages and family stories

about coping with adversity.

(f) Image, memory of a person, thought, or

story that the person accesses to help

cope with adversity.

(g) Information, advice, or wisdom that the

person wishes to pass on to others.

iv) Implications for practice and further research

v) APA Bibliography

2) Reflective essay – This will have two parts.

a) Your personal response to the interview.

i) How did you feel listening to these stories?

ii) What was inspiring?

iii) What connections can you make to your own life?

b) What were your strengths and challenges as an

interviewer/listener?

i) What skills did you use during these interviews?

ii) What did you do well?

iii) What did you struggle with?

iv) As you look ahead to next semester and to your

The project meets all the

standards listed to the left but

also makes creative and effective use of stylistic

elements, such as choice of

words, fluency, and metaphorical language. The

project is fluid and truly

interesting to read.

work as a counselor or psychologists, which skills

do you most wish to improve? If you made those

improvements, what would be different?

Quality of written

communication and reflections.

Writing is inconsistent. Errors in

conventions hinder the reader from

Consistent use of correct

writing conventions – errors

usually do not inhibit the reader’s understanding.

The writing is easy to read. The

logic of the project is explicit

and is easy to track by the reader. The transitions lead the

reader from one section to

another

The surface features of the

project enhance the reader’s

understanding and facilitate communication of its main

ideas. The writing flows well

and is interesting to read.

Program Goals/Claims: 1)

Written communication; 2)

Reflection; 3) Building solutions for children through an

appreciation of their strengths

and resources

NASP Standards: 1) Interventions and mental health

services skills; 2) Research and program evaluation

CTC: PS2 Growth &

Development, 2) PS5

Comprehensive Prevention 3) PS 21Wellness promotion, Crisis

intervention, & Counseling

There are missing pieces to the

assignment and/or they do not have

enough detail.

Details are sometimes missing

and the reflections are not as

thoughtful as expected.

Essays include all elements

above. But paper has less detail

and depth than a 4 or 5

Essay touches on all elements

to above. Paper has good detail

and reflections show insight and new learning.

Preparedness to be a

professional

Project does not yet reflect the

depth of knowledge and quality of

presentation appropriate for this

level of graduate e work.

Project reflects a depth of

knowledge and quality of

presentation appropriate for

this level of graduate work.

Progress toward professional

preparedness is on track.


knowledge and quality of

presentation that would be

considered strong for this level

of graduate e work. Progress

toward professional preparedness is progressing

well.


knowledge end quality of

presentation that exceeds

expectations for this level of

graduate work. Progress toward

professional preparedness is progressing very well.


knowledge end quality of

presentation that far exceeds

expectations for this level of

graduate work. Progress

toward professional preparedness exceeds

expectation.

Documents

Chapman CSP First Year paper Rubric€¦ · Project has most of the required elements in the assignment protocol Project has all the required elements listed in the assignment protocol