CHAPTER 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, …...1.0 Project Description, Location, and Environmental Setting Lindo Lake Restoration Project Supplemental EIR Page 1-3 public amenities)

1.0 Project Description, Location, and Environmental Setting

Lindo Lake Restoration Project Supplemental EIR Page 1-1

CHAPTER 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

1.1 Project Objectives

Section 15124(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to prepare a statement of objectives sought by the proposed project. The objectives assist the County of San Diego (County), as lead agency, in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate in the EIR. The project objectives will also aide decision-makers in preparing findings or a statement of overriding considerations, if necessary. The statement of objectives also includes the underlying purpose of the project. The following are the project objectives set forth by the proposed project:

1. Enhance public access to the lake and the amenities of the park. 2. Restore and enhance the natural aquatic functions of the lake. 3. Improve habitat for aquatic and avian species.

1.2 Project Description

1.2.1 Lake Basin Recontouring

The project proposes excavation and grading of approximately 226,000 cubic yards of silt and sediment to recontour the lakebed, deepen the east and west lake basins, and provide retention basins (Table 1-1). Approximately 27,000 cubic yards of the excavated lake material would be used to stabilize the banks of the lake basins and to create graded mounds surrounding the basins, and for landscaping and habitat creation. The balance of the material (approximately 199,411 cubic yards) would be exported off-site. The grading would be designed to create shallow areas in the east lake basin for nesting and fledgling young birds. The project would also install underwater features to provide shelter for fish. Following grading, the basins would be lined with bentonite clay up to the water surface level in the majority of the west basin and two feet below the water surface level in the east basin. The bentonite clay liner would assist in reduction of groundwater percolation while improving wetland habitat. The banks of the basins would be stabilized by the placement of a layer of cobble rock extending from one foot below the water surface level in the west basin and two feet below the water surface level in the east basin, to a depth of approximately five feet in both basins. Following construction, both basins would feature a maximum depth of 10 feet, with the upper level of inundation occurring at an elevation of 394 feet above mean sea level.

The lake deepening would be conducted in two initial phases, with Phase 1 focused on the east basin and Phase 2 focused on the west basin.

Phase 1 would include dewatering of the east basin by pumping any existing water to the west basin, the removal of material from the east basin; excavation and recontouring of the east basin, including creation of a sediment basin on the east side of the east basin; creation of mounds; off-site export of the remaining excavated material; drainage improvements; water aeration; water circulation; and landscape and irrigation improvements.

Phase 2 would include removal of lake water from the west basin. This would allow for drying of the sediment in the west basin. After drying, the sediment would be removed from the west basin, used for contouring and creation of mounds, and the remainder would be exported off-site. A sediment basin would be created on the north side of the west basin. Some mature trees


Page 1-2 Lindo Lake Restoration Project Supplemental EIR

would need to be relocated or removed to allow for the grading of the basins. New plantings and irrigation would occur around both basins.

Raw water from the Helix Water District pipeline would be used for the initial fill of the deepened lake. Post-construction water levels would be maintained by using groundwater from on-site wells.

Drainage Improvements

Drainage improvements would include extension of existing storm drain pipes; addition of storm drain inlet and outlet protection or energy dissipaters; and creation of sediment basins. Protection would be added to curb inlets along roads located within and adjacent to the park land to capture sediment and reduce flow rates and erosion. There is an existing box culvert underneath the causeway that historically allowed water to flow between the basins during flood events. The project proposes to replace this shallow bottom box culvert with a new culvert that would provide a deepened section along with two additional 48-inch culverts through the causeway that would allow water and aquatic life to circulate between the two basins.

Sediment basins are also proposed to reduce future sediment accumulation within the main lake basins. Ongoing maintenance of the lake basins would require annual monitoring of sediment levels and regular removal of sediment on an as-needed basis to maintain basin depths. Each basin would include markers to identify sediment depths. When accumulated sediment reaches a depth of 12 inches in any part of the lake bottom, it would be removed.

Park Landscaping Improvements

As described above, the lake basin recontouring would produce excavated silt and sediment that would be used to create landscaped mounds surrounding the basins. In addition to these mounds, other proposed park landscaping improvements include installation of two new floating fishing piers extending from the west and east sides of the causeway, two bird watching stations, decorative boulders, and ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) improvements. Additionally, the park’s irrigation system would be modified to provide for temporary irrigation of new plantings as well as seasonal and ongoing drought condition irrigation.

Access and Circulation Improvements

Proposed park access and circulation improvements include the following: removal and replacement of a prefabricated bridge on the north side of the west basin, installation of a new prefabricated pedestrian bridge on the western shore of the west basin that would connect the Lakeside Community Center to the boathouse island; a simulated boardwalk to connect from behind the Community Center to the north parking lot; and construction of a stabilized decomposed granite path around the basins to improve ADA access.

Construction Activities

The lakebed deepening activities (Phases 1 and 2) are anticipated to take approximately 36 months. Equipment proposed to be used for both phases includes excavators, backhoes, dozers, loaders and semi end dumps. Best management practices (BMPs) would be used for erosion control during improvement activities. Proposed BMPs include the use of temporary construction entrances, fence, fiber rolls, silt fence, gravel bags, and storm drain inlet protection. The remaining project improvements (e.g., storm drainage system, public access, circulation,



public amenities) would be implemented as part of Phase 2, which is anticipated to take 16 months.

1.2.2 Project Background

Lindo Lake is divided into a similarly-sized east basin and west basin, separated by an approximately 30-foot-wide causeway that runs north-south through the middle of the lake area. Water flow between the east and west basin is facilitated by a metal pipe and valve underneath the causeway. The lake was originally fed by the waters of Quail Canyon Creek; however, the creek has since been dammed to create nearby Lake Jennings. Water supply to the lake is now limited to urban and surface runoff within the immediate vicinity of the lake, frequently leaving the shallower east basin of the lake in a dry state.

Over time, the lake basins fill with silt and sediments as they collect runoff from the surrounding drainage area. This raises the lakebed elevation, which results in shallow water depth and seasonal drying of the east basin. By excavating the silt and sediment, and then grading and recontouring the lakebeds, the basins can be deepened, allowing the lake to fill with a greater volume of water.

An EIR for improvements to Lindo Lake Park was certified by the County Board of Supervisors on May 27, 1976. The proposed improvements included the following: the addition of three parking lots, picnic tables, a fishing pier and a rowboat concession, relocation of the boat house, as well as, the deepening of the southwestern and western lake basins. The deepening of the lake required the movement of approximately 94,000 cubic yards of material. The material was used as fill for reshaping of the lake shoreline and for redistribution at various locations across the park property. The project also involved using non-permeable material to seal the lakebed. On-site well water and water purchased from the Lakeside Irrigation District was proposed to refill the lake. The certified EIR found minor effects to traffic circulation, biology, vector control, and hydrology. These effects were all determined to be mitigated or avoided to a level below significance.

Subsequently, a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) was prepared for improvements at Lindo Lake Park in conformance with a Park Master Plan dated January 1983. The proposed improvements included the following: the addition of 185 parking spaces, two new park entrances, the addition of a 1,500-square-foot community center building, the addition of a spray fountain/bandstand plaza, relocation of the tennis courts, the addition of a multipurpose field, new horseshoe areas, a new tot lot, expansion of the parcourse, pedestrian, equestrian, and hiking trails, new group picnic tables, renovation and construction of restrooms, new turf and irrigation systems, and the draining and deepening of the eastern lake basin with redistribution of the excavated material for use elsewhere on the park property. Well water was proposed to supplement and maintain the water level in the east basin, while water circulation was improved by using existing lake water for turf irrigation. The SEIR was certified by the County Board of Supervisors on February 28, 1984. The SEIR addressed potential impacts to traffic and circulation, noise, and hydrology/water quality. No significant environmental effects were identified for this project.

1.3 Project Location

The project site is located within the Lindo Lake County Park at 12660 Lindo Lane (Assessor’s Parcel Number 394-180-03-00), and covers approximately 57.46 acres. The project site is bounded by Vine and Chestnut streets to the west, Lakeshore Drive to the north, Petite Lane to



the east, and Lindo Lane to the south. The regional vicinity is shown on Figure 1-1 and the project location is shown on Figure 1-2.

Lindo Lake is surrounded by a park area including walking trails, picnic areas, softball fields, horseshoe pits, tennis courts, play areas, skate park, gazebo (historic former boathouse), community center, and a public library.

1.4 Environmental Setting

1.4.1 Regional Setting

The Lindo Lake Restoration Project (project) is located in the town center of the unincorporated community of Lakeside, in southwestern San Diego County, approximately one-quarter mile south of State Route 67.

The project site is located within the Metro-Lakeside-Jamul segment of the Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego Subarea Plan. The majority of the project site is within a Biological Resource Core Area, because it was mapped as a Pre-Approved Mitigation Area on the wildlife agencies' preapproved mitigation map (Attachment F of Document No. 0769999 on file with the Clerk of the Board).

1.4.2 Local Setting

The Lindo Lake Park area is surrounded by neighborhood retail commercial (grocery), multi-family residential (apartments), single-family residential uses, and Lindo Park Elementary School to the north; single-family residential to the east and south; and a mix of commercial, light industrial, residential, and public facilities (Lakeside Public Library, Lakeside Community Center) to the west.

1.5 Intended Uses of EIR

This SEIR is an “informational document which will inform public agency decision-makers and the public generally of the significant environmental effects of a project, identify possible ways to minimize the significant effects, and describe reasonable alternatives to the project” [CEQA Guidelines Section 15121(a)]. This SEIR was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the County of San Diego Environmental Impact Report Format and General Content Requirements (County of San Diego 2006), CEQA (California Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15000 et seq.).

Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15163 (a), this SEIR has been prepared as a Supplemental EIR because any of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and “only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation.” Section 15163 also states:

(b) The supplement to the EIR need contain only the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised.

(c) A supplement to an EIR shall be given the same kind of notice and public review as is given to a draft EIR under Section 15087.



(d) A supplement to an EIR may be circulated by itself without recirculating the previous draft or final EIR.

(e) When the agency decides whether to approve the project, the decision-making body shall consider the previous EIR as revised by the supplemental EIR. A finding under Section 15091 shall be made for each significant effect shown in the previous EIR as revised.

The original project EIR was certified by the County Board of Supervisors on May 27, 1976, and included analysis of the impacts associated the original improvement project, as described in Section 1.2.1 above. In 1984, a SEIR was certified for a second Lindo Lake County Park improvements project in conformance with the County’s 1983 Park Master Plan. Since that time, a change of circumstances not previously considered in the 1984 SEIR has occurred, including various additional environmental regulations that have been enacted at the local, state, and federal level since 1984.

In addition to the changes in regulatory setting, currently proposed improvements to Lindo Lake Park that were not included among the previously-approved projects nor analyzed in their environmental documents include the following:

• Excavation of a greater volume of lakebed silt and sediment than was previously analyzed

• Off-site hauling of the majority of the excavated material for landfill disposal

• Vegetation removal associated with basin grading

• Installation of cobble rock along the lakeshore

• New hardscape

• Drainage improvements, including construction of sediment basins with associated fencing and gates

• Installation of a pre-fabricated pedestrian bridge and boardwalk Therefore, there is substantial evidence that the proposed project may have significant adverse impacts on the environment not previously considered in the previously-certified original EIR or SEIR. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15163, this new SEIR has been prepared to address changes in circumstances and to provide minor changes and additions to the previously certified EIRs in order to make the previous EIRs adequately apply to the proposed project.

In accordance with Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines, information from the two previously certified and approved environmental documents for Lindo Lake County Park is hereby incorporated by reference into this SEIR. Additionally, Section 15150 states:

a) An EIR or negative declaration may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document which is a matter of public record or is generally available to the public. Where all or part of another document is incorporated by reference, the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the EIR or negative declaration.

b) Where part of another document is incorporated by reference, such other document

shall be made available to the public for inspection at a public place or public building.



The EIR or negative declaration shall state where the incorporated documents will be available for inspection. At a minimum, the incorporated document shall be made available to the public in an office of the lead agency in the county where the project would be carried out or in one or more public buildings such as county offices or public libraries if the lead agency does not have an office in the county.

c) Where an EIR or negative declaration uses incorporation by reference, the incorporated

part of the referenced document shall be briefly summarized where possible or briefly described if the data or information cannot be summarized. The relationship between the incorporated part of the referenced document and the EIR shall be described.

d) Where an agency incorporates information from an EIR that has previously been

reviewed through the state review system, the state identification number of the incorporated document should be included in the summary or designation described in subdivision (c).

e) Examples of materials that may be incorporated by reference include but are not limited

to: 1) A description of the environmental setting from another EIR. 2) A description of the air pollution problems prepared by an air pollution control agency

concerning a process involved in the project. 3) A description of the city or county general plan that applies to the location of the

project. f) Incorporation by reference is most appropriate for including long, descriptive, or

technical materials that provide general background but do not contribute directly to the analysis of the problem at hand.

This SEIR evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the currently proposed project. This is a supplemental EIR to the original EIR (1976) and SEIR (1984), described above, prepared for earlier restoration activities at Lindo Lake County Park.

Public Review and Participation Process

Pursuant to Section 15082 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Preparation of the SEIR was issued on March 10, 2017 to inform persons and organizations that may be concerned with the environmental effects of the project, and to request public comment on the project and the contents of the SEIR by written correspondence or participation in a planned scoping meeting (Appendix A). Public agencies with specific statutory responsibilities were requested to indicate their specific role in the project approval process.

On the evening of March 16, 2017, a public scoping meeting hosted by representatives from the County Department of Public Works and the Department of Parks and Recreation was held at the Lakeside Community Center to discuss the project and the scope of the contents of the SEIR. At the meeting, it was reported that preparation of environmental studies was currently underway for the following issue areas: biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and traffic. Public comment was received and documented in the meeting minutes.



This SEIR will be made available for review by members of the public and public agencies for 31 days to provide comments “on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts on the environment and ways in which the significant effects of the project might be avoided or mitigated,” as stated in CEQA Guidelines, Section 15204 (14 CCR 15000 et seq.).

As the designated lead agency, the County is responsible for preparing this document. The decision to approve the proposed project is within the purview of the County Board of Supervisors. When deciding whether to approve the project, the County will use the information included in this SEIR to consider potential impacts on the physical environment associated with the project.

The County will consider written comments received on the SEIR in making its decision whether to certify the SEIR as complete and in compliance with CEQA, and also whether to approve or deny the project. Environmental considerations and economic and social factors may be weighed to determine the most appropriate course of action. If the SEIR is certified and the project approved, agencies with permitting authority over all or portions of the project may use the SEIR as the basis for their evaluation of environmental effects of the project and approval or denial of applicable permits.

1.6 Project Inconsistencies with Applicable Regional and General Plans

The project was reviewed for consistency with the following applicable regional and general plans:

County of San Diego General Plan Lakeside Community Plan County Zoning Ordinance County of San Diego Parks Master Plan

This review did not identify any inconsistencies with these plans.

1.7 List of Past, Present, and Reasonably Anticipated Future Projects in the Project Area

A list of past, present, and reasonably anticipated future projects in the project area was prepared in consultation with County staff that serves as the basis for the cumulative impact analysis. A description of these projects is provided in Table 1-2, and the locations of these projects are presented in Figure 1-3.

1.8 Growth Inducing Impacts

CEQA requires that a discussion be prepared in environmental documents regarding the ways in which a proposed project could be growth inducing. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d) identifies a project as growth inducing if it would foster economic growth or population growth, or results in the construction of new housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. New employees from commercial or industrial development, schools, golf courses, and new population from residential development represent direct forms of growth. Indirect forms of growth include the demand for additional goods and services associated with the increase in project population that would reduce or remove barriers to growth in other nearby locations.



Under CEQA, growth inducement is not necessarily considered detrimental, beneficial, or of little significance to the environment. The growth inducing potential of a project could be considered significant if it fosters growth or results in a concentration of population in excess of what is assumed in adopted master plans, land use plans, or projections made by regional planning agencies, such as the San Diego Association of Governments. Additionally, a project could be considered growth inducing if the project provides infrastructure or service capacity to accommodate growth beyond the levels currently permitted by local or regional plans or policies.

The proposed project is limited to improvements of Lindo Lake and would not construct any new housing or business that would induce population growth, nor extend roadways or infrastructure that would indirectly induce population growth. The proposed project would not change the existing land use at the project site from that of a County Park, nor would it affect the existing or planned zoning and land use designations of the surrounding areas. Although the proposed park improvements would be beneficial to nearby residents who use the park facilities, they would not induce population growth, either directly or indirectly.

Table 1-1

Summary of Cut and Fill Quantities (cubic yards [cy])

Phase Proposed Cut Proposed Export On-Site Re-Use Phase 1 (East Basin) 101,000 cy 76,831 cy 24,169 cy Phase 2 (West Basin) 125,315 cy 122,580 cy 2,735 cy Total 226,315 cy 199,411 cy 26,904 cy



Table 1-2 Past, Present, and Reasonable Anticipated Future Projects in the Project Area

Cumulative Project

Map Key Project Name Project Type Location(s)

County of San Diego Reference

Number

Assessor's Parcel

Number(s) Potential Resources

Affected/Notes 1 Lake Jennings

Marketplace Shopping Center Gasoline with Food Mart and Car Wash

South side of Old Highway 80 between Ridge Hill Road and Rios Canyon Road, Lakeside, CA

TM5490 PDS2014-TM-5590

395-250-08 Potential biological resources, air quality, and traffic impacts.

2 Ashwood II Condo Conversion

Residential subdivision into nine lots on a 4.54-acre site

9288 Adlai Road Lakeside, CA

TM5356 PDS2004-3100-5356

398-390-19 Potential impacts to biological resources impacts, noise, and utilities and service systems. Mitigated Negative Declaration approved in 2006.

3 Greenhills Ranch

Estate Residential 9370 Adlai Road 9385 Adlai Road, Lakeside, CA

TM5140/TM5563 398-400-08-00 Potential biological resources and cultural resources impacts.

4 Crest/Dehesa Estate Residential 12101 Muth Valley Lakeside, CA

TM5317 329-121-02-00 Project is idle.

5 Crestlake Single-Family Detached 15045 Old Hwy 80, Lakeside, CA

TM5082 PDS2004-3100-5082

402-210-19 Potential impacts to biological resources. EIR approved in 2007.

6 Magnolia Courts

Single-Family Detached 9317 Lake Jennings Park Road, Lakeside, CA

TM5541 PDS2007-3100-5541

395-220-11 Project is idle. Site is currently vacant/undeveloped land.

7 Clegg Single-Family Detached 13516 E Lakeview Road Lakeside, CA

TM 5286 PDS2004-3100-5286

398-390-66 Negative Declaration approved in 2007.

8 Julian Avenue Major Subdivision

Single-Family Detached 9626 Christmas Tree Lane, Lakeside, CA

TM 5539 PDS2007-3100-5539


9 Oakmont II Single-Family Detached Located off of Flinn Springs Road and Oak Creek Road, Lakeside, CA

TM5421 PDS2005-3100-5421

396-020-13 Potential biological resources and noise impacts. Mitigated Negative Declaration approved in 2014.

10 Sunny Ridge Estates

Single-Family Detached 11427 El Nopal, Lakeside, CA

TM5436 379-024-31-00 Noise and traffic impacts.

11 Enniss Sand Mines

Minor alterations at the existing mining area.

12356 Moreno Avenue, 12238 Moreno Avenue, 12332 Vigilante Road , 12417 Vigilante Road , Lakeside, CA

87-075-01 87-006-01 PDS2005-3301-87-075-01 PDS2011-3311-87-0011

375-040-01 25-062-06

In Progress. No environmental documents available as of the date of this SEIR.



Table 1-2 Past, Present, and Reasonable Anticipated Future Projects in the Project Area

Cumulative Project

Map Key Project Name Project Type Location(s)

County of San Diego Reference

Number

Assessor's Parcel

Number(s) Potential Resources

Affected/Notes 12 Turner Sand

Mine (East County Sand Mine)

Extraction of 1,175,000 cubic yards of material (sand and top soil). The Reclamation Plan consists of importing 1,278,000 cubic yards of clean soil, rock, and asphalt for use as onsite fill, channel rip-rap, and to construct a portion of Slaughterhouse Creek and San Vicente Creek channels to convey 100-year storm.

South of San Vicente Avenue Bounded by SR-67 to the west and Moreno Avenue to the east. Lakeside, CA

PDS2009-3300-09-016 375-100-24 375-041-12 375-041-09 375-041-28 375-041-29 375-100-09

Approved July 14, 2017 (MND number PDS2009-ER-09-14-008)

13 Settler's Point Multi-Family Residential 13244 I-8 Business, Lakeside, CA

TM5423 PDS2005-3100-5423


14 Hanson El Monte Pond Flood Control

Restoration and Recharge 10402 El Monte Road, Lakeside, CA

PDS2014-LDGRMJ-00012 Unavailable EIR has been circulated for public review.

15 Lakeside Anaerobic Digester

Organic waste processing and electrical generation

1,500 feet south of Vigilante Road on the east side of SR-67, Lakeside, CA

PDS2018-MUP-18-001 375-041-23-00 EIR has been circulated for public review.

FIGURE 1-1

Regional Location

kjUSMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv

Mission TrailsRegional Park

Cleveland NF

SutherlandLake

Lake Hodges

El CapitanReservoir

San VicenteReservoir

LovelandReservoir

Barrett Lake

SweetwaterReservoir

Lower OtayReservoir

Sa

nD

i e g u i t o

Ri v

e r

Sa

n

Di e g u i t o

Ri

v

e r

Sa

n t aY s a b e l

Cr

ee k

Sw e

et w

at e r

Ri v

er

S w e et w a t e r

Ri v e r

C

o t t

on

wo

od

Cr

ee

k

Du l z u

r

a

Cr

ee

k

Sa

nD

ie

go

Ri

ve

r

Ot

ay

R i v e r

Es

co n

di d

o

Cr e

ek

S a n t a Y s a b e l

C r e e k

Sw

ee

tw

at e r

Riv

er

S a nD

i eg

oR i v

er

Inaja

and CosmitReservation

Mesa Grande

Reservation

Jamul Indian

Village

Viejas Reservation

Cuyapaipe

Reservation

Sycuan

Reservation

Capitan Grande

Reservation

Santa

YsabelReservation

Barona

Reservation

Alpine

Bostonia

Casade Oro-Mount

Helix

Crest

FairbanksRanch

Granite Hills

HarbisonCanyon

Jamul

La Presa

Ramona

RanchoSan Diego

San DiegoCountry

Estates

Spring

Valley

WinterGardens

UV163

UV282

UV78

UV54

UV79

UV75

UV125

UV67

UV94

UV52 §̈¦8

§̈¦805

§̈¦5

§̈¦15

S A N D I E G O

C O U N T Y

Chula Vista

Coronado

El Cajon

Encinitas

Escondido

Imperial Beach

LaMesa

LemonGrove

National City

Poway

San Diego

San Marcos

Santee kjUSMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv

Mission TrailsRegional Park

Cleveland NF

SutherlandLake

Lake Hodges

El CapitanReservoir

San VicenteReservoir

LovelandReservoir

Barrett Lake

SweetwaterReservoir

Lower OtayReservoir

Sa

nD

i e g u i t o

Ri v

e r

Sa

n

Di e g u i t o

Ri

v

e r

Sa

n t aY s a b e l

Cr

ee k

Sw e

et w

at e r

Ri v

er

S w e et w a t e r

Ri v e r

C

o t t

on

wo

od

Cr

ee

k

Du l z u

r

a

Cr

ee

k

Sa

nD

ie

go

Ri

ve

r

Ot

ay

R i v e r

Es

co n

di d

o

Cr e

ek

S a n t a Y s a b e l

C r e e k

Sw

ee

tw

at e r

Riv

er

S a nD

i eg

oR i v

er

Inaja

and CosmitReservation

Mesa Grande

Reservation

Jamul Indian

Village

Viejas Reservation

Cuyapaipe

Reservation

Sycuan

Reservation

Capitan Grande

Reservation

Santa

YsabelReservation

Barona

Reservation

Alpine

Bostonia

Casade Oro-Mount

Helix

Crest

FairbanksRanch

Granite Hills

HarbisonCanyon

Jamul

La Presa

Ramona

RanchoSan Diego

San DiegoCountry

Estates

Spring

Valley

WinterGardens

UV163

UV282

UV78

UV54

UV79

UV75

UV125

UV67

UV94

UV52 §̈¦8

§̈¦805

§̈¦5

§̈¦15

S A N D I E G O

C O U N T Y

Chula Vista

Coronado

El Cajon

Encinitas

Escondido

Imperial Beach

LaMesa

LemonGrove

National City

Poway

San Diego

San Marcos

Santee

0 5Miles [

M:\JOBS5\8545\common_gis\fig1-1_EIR.mxd 12/17/2018 fmm

SAN DIEGO

RIVERSIDE

SAN BERNARDINO

ORANGE

MEXICO

Project Locationkj

FIGURE 1-2

Project Location on Aerial Photograph

KA

TIE

LA

KE

CT

CYPRESS ST

WH

ITE

HIL

LS

RD

LOS CO

CHES RD

LINDO LN

JULIAN AVE

CA

RA

WA

Y S

T

LAKESHORE DR

WOODSIDE AVE

LINDO LN

SHENANDOAH DR

PARKSIDE ST

TA

MIL

RD

MA

INE

AV

E

CARAWAY ST

LIN

DO

LA

KE

PL

CHEST

NU

TS

T

LAUREL ST

BE ECHTREE ST

PE

TIT

E L

N

VINE ST

KA

TIE

LA

KE

CT

CYPRESS ST

WH

ITE

HIL

LS

RD

LOS CO

CHES RD

LINDO LN

JULIAN AVE

CA

RA

WA

Y S

T

LAKESHORE DR

WOODSIDE AVE

LINDO LN

SHENANDOAH DR

PARKSIDE ST

TA

MIL

RD

MA

INE

AV

E

CARAWAY ST

LIN

DO

LA

KE

PL

CHEST

NU

TS

T

LAUREL ST

BE ECHTREE ST

PE

TIT

E L

N

VINE ST


0 250Feet

Image source: Nearmap (flown January 2017)

[

Project Boundary

FIGURE 1-3

Cumulative Projects

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

LAK

EJ

E

NNINGS

PARK

LO

SCO

CHES

SR-67

SR

-67

OLDE 80

WIL

DCAT CANYON

UV67

§̈¦8

13

1

2

7

6

3 5

8

14

9

10

12

15 11

4

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

LAK

EJ

E

NNINGS

PARK

LO

SCO

CHES

SR-67

SR

-67

OLDE 80

WIL

DCAT CANYON

UV67

§̈¦8

13

1

2

7

6

3 5

8

14

9

10

12

15 11

4


0 1Miles

Image source: DigitalGlobe (flownDecember 2017)

[

Project Boundary

!( Cumulative Projects



This page intentionally left blank

Documents

CHAPTER 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, …...1.0 Project Description, Location, and Environmental Setting Lindo Lake Restoration Project Supplemental EIR Page 1-3 public amenities)