88
Chapter 8 Perfect Competitio n © 2004 Thomson Learning/South- Western

Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Chapter 8

Perfect Competition

© 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Page 2: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

2

Timing of a Supply Response

A supply response is the change in quantity of output in response to a change in demand conditions.

The pattern of equilibrium prices will be different depending upon the time period– In the very short run, quantity is fixed so there is no

supply response

Page 3: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

3

Timing of a Supply Response

– In the short run existing firms may change the quantity they are supplying, but no firms enter or exit the market.

– In the long run firms can further change the quantity supplied and new firms may enter the market.

Page 4: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

4

Pricing in the Very Short Run

The market period (very short run) is a short period of time during which quantity supplied is fixed.

In this period, price acts to ration demand as it adjusts to clear the market.

This situation is illustrated in Figure 8.1 where supply is fixed at Q*.

Page 5: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

5

Price

S

D

P1

Quantityper week

Q*0

FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very Short Run

Page 6: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

6

Pricing in the Very Short Run

When demand is represented by the curve D, P1 is the equilibrium price.

The equilibrium price is the price at which the quantity demanded by buyers of a good is equal to the quantity supplied by sellers of the good.

Page 7: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

7

Shifts in Demand: Price as a Rationing Device

If demand were to increase, as illustrated by the new demand curve D’ in Figure 8.1, P1 is no longer the equilibrium price since the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied.

The new equilibrium price is now P2 where price has rationed the good to those who value it the most.

Page 8: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

8

Price

P2

S

D

D’P1

Quantityper week

Q*0

FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very Short Run

Page 9: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

9

APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions

Auctions on the internet have rapidly become one of the most popular ways of selling all manner of goods.

There is a sense that internet auctions resemble the theoretical situation illustrated in Figure 8.1…the goods are in fixed supply and will be sold for whatever bidders are willing to pay.

However, this view of things may be too simple because it ignores dynamic elements which may be present in suppliers’ decisions.

Page 10: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

10

APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions

A quick examination of internet auction sites suggests that operators employ a variety of features in their auctions.

“Reserve” prices, bidding history, and “buy it now” prices are all features offered at various sites.

Attempts to answer the many questions that surround the returns to operators usually focus on the uncertainties inherent in the auction process and how bidders respond to them.

Page 11: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

11

APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions

Because buyers and sellers are total strangers in internet auctions, a number of special provisions have been developed to mitigate the risks of fraud that the parties might encounter in such situations.

The primary risk facing bidders is in knowing that the goods being offered meet expected quality standards.

Previous bidders provide rankings to many of the auction sites.

Page 12: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

12

APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions

For sellers, the primary risk is that they will not be paid.

Various intermediaries (such as Pay Pal) have been developed to address this problem.

Page 13: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

13

Applicability of the Very Short-Run Model

This model may only apply where the goods are very perishable.

It is usually assumed that a rise in price will prompt producers to bring additional quantity to the market.– This can result from greater production, or, if the

goods are durable, from existing stock held by producers.

Page 14: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

14

Short-Run Supply

In the short-run the number of firms is fixed as no firms are able to enter or leave the market.

However, existing firms can adjust their quantity in response to price changes.

Because of the large number of firms, each firm is treated as a price taker.

Page 15: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

15

Construction of a Short-Run Supply Curve

The quantity that is supplied is the sum of the quantities supplied by each firm.

The short-run market supply curve is the relationship between market price and quantity supplied of a good in the short run.

In Figure 8.2 it is assumed that there are only two firms, A and B.

Page 16: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

16

Price

P

SA

Output

(a) Firm A

0

Price

Output

(b) Firm B

0

Price

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

0

FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve

qA1

Page 17: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

17

Price

P

SA

Output

(a) Firm A

0

Price

SB

Output

(b) Firm B

0

Price

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

0

FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve

qA1 qB

1

Page 18: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

18

Price

P

SA

Output

(a) Firm A

0

Price

SB

Output

(b) Firm B

0

Price

S

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

0 Q1

FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve

qA1 qB

1

Page 19: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

19

Construction of a Short-Run Supply Curve

Both firm A’s and firm B’s short-run supply curves (their marginal cost curves) are shown in Figure 8.2(a) and Figure 8.2(b) respectively.

The market supply curve is the horizontal sum of the two firms are every price.– In Figure 8.2(c), Q1 equals the sum of q1

A and q1B.

Page 20: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

20

Short-Run Price Determination

Figure 8.3 (b) shows the market equilibrium where the market demand curve D and the short-run supply curve S intersect at a price of P1 and quantity Q1.

This equilibrium would persist since what firms supply at P1 is exactly what people want to buy at that price.

Page 21: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

21

Price SMC

SAC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

0

Price S

D

Quantityper week

(b) The Market

Price

Quantity

(c) Typical Person

0 0

FIGURE 8.3: Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms Determine market price in the Short Run

P1

q1q2 q1 q2 q1‘Q1 Q2

d

Page 22: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

22

Price SMC

SAC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

0

Price S

D

Quantityper week

(b) The Market

Price

Quantity

(c) Typical Person

0 0

D’

FIGURE 8.3: Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms Determine market price in the Short Run

P1

P2

q1q2 q1 q2 q1‘Q1 Q2

d

d’

Page 23: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

23

Functions of the Equilibrium Price

The price serves as a signal to producers about how much should be produced.– To maximize profit, firms will produce the output

level for which marginal costs equal P1.

– This yields an aggregate production of Q1.

Page 24: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

24

Functions of the Equilibrium Price

Given the price, utility maximizing individuals will decide how much of their limited incomes to spend– At price P1 the total quantity demanded is Q1.

– No other price brings about the balance of quantity demanded and quantity supplied.

These situations are depicted in Figure 8.3 (a) and (b) for the typical firm and individual, respectively.

Page 25: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

25

Effect of an Increase in Market Demand

If the typical person’s demand for the good increases from d to d’, the entire market demand curve will shift to D’ as shown in figure 8.3.

The new equilibrium is P2, Q2 where a new balance between demand and supply is established.

Page 26: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

26

Effect of an Increase in Market Demand

The increase in demand resulted in a higher equilibrium price, P2 and a greater equilibrium quantity, Q2.

P2 has rationed the typical person’s demand so that only q2 is demanded rather than the q’1 that would have been demanded at P1.

P2 also signals the typical firm to increase production from q1 to q2.

Page 27: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

27

Shifts in Demand Curves

Demand will increase, shift outward, because– Income increases– The price of a substitute rises– The price of a complement falls– Preferences for the good increase

Page 28: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

28

Shifts in Demand Curves

Demand will decrease, shift inward, because– Income falls– The price of a substitute falls– The price of a complement rises– Preferences for the good diminish

Page 29: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

29

Shifts in Supply Curves

Supply will increase, shift outward, because– Input prices fall– Technology improves

Supply will decrease, shift inward, because– Input prices rise

Page 30: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

30

Table 8.1: Reasons for a Shift in a Demand or Supply Curve

Demand Supply Shifts outward ( ) because Shifts outward ( ) because Income increases Input prices fall Price of substitute rises Technology improves Price of complement falls Preferences for good increase Shifts inward ( ) because Shifts inward ( ) because Income falls Input prices rise Price of substitute falls Price of complement rises Preferences for good diminish

Page 31: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

31

Short-Run Supply Elasticity

The short-run elasticity of supply is the percentage change in quantity supplied in the short run in response to a 1 percent change in price.

[8.1] .price in change Percentage

runshort in supplied

quantity in change Percentage

elasticitysupply run-Short

Page 32: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

32

Short-Run Supply Elasticity

If a 1percent increase in price causes firms to increase quantity supplied by more than 1 percent, supply is elastic.

If a 1 percent increase in price causes firms to increase quantity supplied by less than 1 percent, supply is inelastic.

Page 33: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

33

Shits in Supply Curves and the Importance of the Shape of the Demand Curve

The effect of a shift in supply upon equilibrium levels of P and Q depends upon the shape of the demand curve.– If demand is elastic, as in Figure 8.4 (a), a

decrease in supply has a small effect on price but a relatively large effect on quantity.

– If demand is inelastic, as in Figure 8.4 (b), the decrease in supply has a greater effect on price than on quantity.

Page 34: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

34

Price

P

(a) Elastic Demand

Q

S

D

0 Quantityper week

(b) Inelastic Demand

Price

S

D

P

0 QQuantityper week

FIGURE 8.4: Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve

Page 35: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

35

Price

P

(a) Elastic Demand

Q

S

D

0 Quantityper week

(b) Inelastic Demand

PriceS’

SS’

D

P

P’

P’

0Q’ QQ’Quantityper week

FIGURE 8.4: Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve

Page 36: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

36

Shifts in Demand Curves and the Importance of the Shape of the Supply Curve

The effect of a shift in demand upon equilibrium levels of P and Q depends upon the shape of the supply curve.– If supply is inelastic, as in Figure 8.5 (a), the effect

on price is much greater than on quantity.– If the supply curve is elastic, as in Figure 8.5 (b), the

effect on price is relatively smaller than the effect on quantity.

Page 37: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

37

Quantityper week

(a) Inelastic Supply

S

(b) Elastic Supply

S

Quantityper week

Q Q

P P

P’

PricePrice

0 0

D D

Figure 8.5: Effect of A shift in the Demand Curve Depends on the Shape of the Short-Run Supply Curve

Page 38: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

38

Quantityper week

(a) Inelastic Supply

S

(b) Elastic Supply

S

Quantityper week

Q Q’ Q Q’

P PP’

P’

PricePrice

0 0

D D

D’D’

Figure 8.5: Effect of A shift in the Demand Curve Depends on the Shape of the Short-Run Supply Curve

Page 39: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

39

APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil

Ethanol has potentially desirable properties as a fuel for automobiles or additive to gasoline that may reduce air pollution.

Several governments have adopted subsides to producers of ethanol.

One way to show the effect of a subsidy is to treat it as a shift in the short-run supply curve as shown in Figure 1.

Page 40: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

40

Price

($/gallon)

D

Quantity(million gallons)

Q1

S1

0

APPLICATION 8.2: Figure 1: Ethanol Subsidies Shift the Supply Curve Price

P1

Page 41: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

41

Price

($/gallon)

D

Subsidy

Quantity(million gallons)

Q1

S1

0

APPLICATION 8.2: Figure 1: Ethanol Subsidies Shift the Supply Curve Price

S2

Q2

P1

P2

Page 42: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

42

APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil

The subsidy shifts out the supply curve (by about 54 cents-a-gallon in the U.S.) which results in a quantity demanded increase from Q1 to Q2.

The total cost of the subsidy depends upon the per-gallon amount and on the amount of the increase in quantity demanded.

Page 43: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

43

APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil

In the U.S. it is made from corn, and the subsidy is primarily found in Iowa where many major corn producers are located.

In Brazil it is made from sugar cane and was heavily subsidized until Economic liberalization in the 1990s.

Due to political pressure from producers, the subsidy is again being proposed.

Page 44: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

44

A Numerical Illustration

Suppose the quantity of cassette tapes demanded per week (Q) depends on the price of the tapes (P) per equation 8.2,

Suppose short-run supply is given by equation 8.3.

[8.2] 10 :Demand PQ

[8.3] 2 :Supply PQ

Page 45: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

45

A Numerical Illustration

Figure 8.6 shows the graph for these equations.

Since the supply curve intersects the vertical axis at P = 2, this is the shutdown price.

The equilibrium price is $6 with people demanding 4 tapes which equals the amount supplied by the firms.

Page 46: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

46

Price

10

6

2

Tapesper week

4 10

S

D0

FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply Curves for Cassette Tapes

Page 47: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

47

A Numerical Illustration

If the demand increased as reflected in equation 8.4, the former equilibrium price and quantity would no longer hold.

As shown in Figure 8.6, the new equilibrium price is $7 where the quantity demanded and supplied of tapes is 5.

[8.4] 12 PQ

Page 48: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

48

Price

$12

10

765

2

Tapesper week

3456 1012

S

D0

D’

FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply Curves for Cassette Tapes

Page 49: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

49

A Numerical Illustration

Table 8.2 shows the two cases. After the increase in demand, there is an

excess demand for tapes at the old equilibrium price of $6.

The increase in price from $6 to $7 restores equilibrium in the market.

Page 50: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

50

TABLE 8.2: Supply and Demand Equilibrium in the Market for Cassette Tapes

Supply Demand

Price

Q = P - 2 Quantity Supplied (Tapes per Week)

Case 1 Q = 10 – P Quantity Demanded (Tapes per Week)

Case 2 q = 12 – P Quantity Demanded (Tapes per Week)

$10 8 0 2 9 7 1 3 8 6 2 4 7 5 3 5 6 4 4 6 5 3 5 7 4 2 6 8 3 1 7 9 2 0 8 10 1 0 9 11 0 0 10 12

New equilibrium Initial equilibrium

Page 51: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

51

The Long Run

Long run supply responses are much more flexible than in the short run.– Long-run cost curves reflect greater input flexibility.– Firms can enter and exit the market in response to

profit opportunities.

Page 52: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

52

Equilibrium Conditions

In a perfectly competitive equilibrium, no firm has an incentive to change its behavior.– Firms must be choosing the profit maximizing level

of output.– Firms must be content to stay in or out of the

market.

Page 53: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

53

Profit Maximization

It is assumed that the goal of each firm is to maximize profits.– Since each firm is a price taker, this implies that

each firm product where price equals long-run marginal cost.

– This equilibrium condition, P = MC determines the firm’s output choice and its choice of inputs that minimize their long-run costs.

Page 54: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

54

Entry and Exit

The perfectly competitive model assumes that firms entail no special costs when they exit and enter the market.– Firms will be enticed to enter the market when

economic profits are positive.– Firms will leave the market when economic profits

are negative.

Page 55: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

55

Entry and Exit

Entry will cause the short-run market supply curve to shift outward causing the market price to fall.– This will continue until positive economic profits

are no longer available.

Exit causes the short-run market supply curve to shift inward causing the market price to increase, eliminating the economic losses.

Page 56: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

56

Long-Run Equilibrium

For purposes of this chapter, it is assumed that all firms producing a particular good have identical cost curves.

Thus, in the long-run equilibrium all firms earn zero economic profits.

Firms will produce at minimum average total costs where P = MC and P = AC.

Page 57: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

57

Long-Run Equilibrium

P = MC results from the assumption that firm’s are profit maximizers.

P = AC results because market forces cause long run economic profits to equal zero.

In the long run, firm owners will only earn normal returns on their investments.

Page 58: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

58

Long-Run Supply: The Constant Cost Case

The constant cost case is a market in which entry or exit has no effect on the cost curves of firms.

Figure 8.7 demonstrates long-run equilibrium for the constant cost case.

Figure 8.7 (b) shows that market where the market demand and supply curves are D and S, respectively, and equilibrium price is P1.

Page 59: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

59

Price SMCS

D

MCAC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

0

Price

Quantityper week

(b) Total Market

0

FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case

q1 Q1

P1

Page 60: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

60

Price SMCS

D

D

MCAC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

0

Price

Quantityper week

(b) Total Market

Q20

FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case

q1q2 Q1

P1

P2

Page 61: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

61

Price SMCS

S’

D

D

LS

MCAC

Output

(a) Typical Firm

0

Price

Quantityper week

(b) Total Market

Q20

FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case

q1 q2 Q3Q1

P1

P2

Page 62: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

62

Long-Run Supply: The Constant Cost Case

The typical firm will produce output level q1 which results in Q1 in the market.

The typical firm is maximizing profits since price is equal to long-run marginal cost.

The typical firm is earning zero economic profits since price equals long-run average total costs.

There is no incentive for exit or entry.

Page 63: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

63

A Shift in Demand

If demand increases to D’, the short-run price will increase to P2.

A typical firm will maximize profits by producing q2 which will result in short-run economic profits (P2 > AC).

Positive economic profits cause new firms to enter the market until economic profits again equal zero.

Page 64: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

64

A Shift in Demand

Since costs do no increase with entry, the typical firm’s costs curves do not change.

The supply curve shifts to S’ where the equilibrium price returns to P1 and the typical firm produces q1 again.

The new long-run equilibrium output will be Q3 with more firms in the market.

Page 65: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

65

Long-Run Supply Curve

Regardless of the shift in demand, market forces will cause the equilibrium price to return to P1 in the long-run.

The long-run supply curve is horizontal at the low point of the firms long-run average total cost curves.

This long-run supply curve is labeled LS in Figure 8.7 (b).

Page 66: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

66

APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals

Movies have been available for home rental since the 1920s.

The basic rental business has consistently exhibited the characteristics of a constant cost industry.

By the end of the 1980s, more than 70% of U.S. households owned VHS tape players.

At first the rental industry was quite profitable, but there were no significant barriers to entry.

Page 67: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

67

APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals

Because inputs used by the industry (low-wage workers and simple rental space) were readily available at market prices, the industry had a perfectly elastic long-run supply curve – it could easily meet exploding demand with no increase in price.

The number of tape rental outlets grew fourfold and the standard price for rental of a movies fell to about $1.50 per night.

Page 68: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

68

APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals

Introduction of DVD technology in the mid-1990s followed a similar path.

Once a critical threshold of households owned DVD players, the rental market for movies on DVD emerged quickly.

Again, the absence of barriers to entry together with the ready availability of inputs resulted in a close approximation to the constant cost model.

Page 69: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

69

APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals

This elastic supply response has also dictated a strict market test for innovations in the movie rental business – such innovations must be cost-competitive with existing methods of distribution or they will not be adopted.

The fate of “Divx” technology provides an instructive example.

Because consumers had to purchase special equipment, Divx gained few adherents and was largely abandoned by the start of 1999.

Page 70: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

70

Shape of the Long-Run Supply Curve: The Increasing Cost Case

The increasing cost case is a market in which the entry of firms increases firms’ costs.– New firms may increase demand for scarce inputs

driving up their prices.– New firms may impose external costs in the form

of air or water pollution.– New firms may place strains on public facilities

increasing costs for all firms in the market.

Page 71: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

71

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q1 q20 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMC

MC

AC

Output q3

P1

P3

P2

P3

0 0

Price Price

Page 72: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

72

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q1 q20 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMCMC

AC

Output q3

P1

P2P2

Q3Q2

D’

0 0

Price Price

Page 73: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

73

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

LS

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q1 q20 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMCMC

AC

Output q3

P1

P3

P2

P3

P2

Q3Q2

D’ S’

0 0

Price Price

Page 74: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

74

The Increasing Cost Case

This case is shown in Figure 8.8, where the initial equilibrium price is P1 with the typical firm producing q1 with total output Q1. Economic profits are zero.

The increase in demand to D’, with short-run supply curve S, causes equilibrium price to increase to P2 with the typical firm producing q2 resulting in positive profits.

Page 75: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

75

The Increasing Cost Case

The positive profits entice firms to enter which drives up costs.

The typical firm’s new cost curves are shown in Figure 8.8 (b).

The new long-run equilibrium price is P3 with market output Q3.

The long-run supply curve, LS, is positively sloped because of the increasing costs.

Page 76: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

76

Long-Run Supply Elasticity

The long-run elasticity of supply is the percentage change in quantity supplied in the long run in response to a 1 percent change in price.

[8.5] price in change Percentage

run long thein supplied

quantity in change Percentage

supply of elasticity run-Long

Page 77: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

77

TABLE 8.3: Estimated Long-Run Supply Elasticities

Industry Elasticity EstimateAgriculture Corn + 0.27 Soybeans + 0.13 Wheat + 0.03Aluminum Nearly infiniteCoal + 15.0Medical Care + 0.15 - + 0.60Natural Gas (U.S.) + 0.50Crude Oil (U.S.) +0.75

Page 78: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

78

The Decreasing Cost Case

The decreasing cost case is a market in which the entry of firms decreases firms’ costs.– Entry may produce a larger pool of trained labor

which reduces the costs of hiring.– Entry may provide a “critical mass” of

industrialization that permits the development of more efficient transportation, communications, and financial networks.

Page 79: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

79

The Decreasing Cost Case

The initial equilibrium is shown as P1, Q1 in Figure 8.9 (c).

The increase in demand from D to D’ results in the short-run equilibrium, P2, Q2 where the typical firm is earning positive economic profits.

Entry drives down costs for the typical firm, as shown in Figure 8.9 (b).

Page 80: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

80

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q10 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMC MC

AC

Output

P1

P2

Price Price

0 0

Page 81: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

81

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q1 q20 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week

(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMC MC

AC

Output

P1

P2P2

Q2

D’Price Price

0 0

Page 82: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

82

Price

P1

SMC

MCAC

D

S

LS

(a) Typical Firm before Entry

q1 q20 Output

(b) Typical Firm after Entry

Quantityper week(c) The Market

Q1

2

FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve

SMC MC

AC

Output q3

P1

P3

P2

P3

P2

Q3Q2

D’

S’

Price Price

0 0

Page 83: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

83

The Decreasing Cost Case

Entry continues until short-run economic profits are eliminated.

The new long-run equilibrium is P3, Q3 as shown in Figure 8.9 (c).

The long-run supply curve is downward sloping due to the decreasing costs as labeled LS in Figure 8.9 (c).

Page 84: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

84

APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?

Network externalities occur when additional users cause network costs to decline.– Subject to Metcalfe’s Law which states that the

number of interconnections possible in a given communications network expands with the square of the number of subscribers in the network.

Page 85: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

85

APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?

These cause negatively sloped long-run supply curves.– This can cause lower consumer prices when

demand expands.

Industries subject to network externalities include telecommunications, computer software, and the Internet.

Page 86: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

86

APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?

Telecommunications– Most of the gains in developed countries have been

realized, but remain for less developed.

Computer Software– As adoption grows, lower learning costs for users.– These benefits may explain why software

companies are not too concerned with pirating.

Page 87: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

87

APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?

The Internet– Since anything that can be encoded in digital format

can be shared over the network, benefits for specialized groups can also be realized.

– This, along with the improved storage capacity of computers, makes it possible to provide specific types of services that where cost prohibitive before the Internet.

Page 88: Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

88

Infant Industries

Initially the cost of production of a new product may be very high.– As the pool of skilled workers grows, costs may

decline.

It is often argued that these “infant” industries must be protected from lower-cost foreign competition until they reach the lower cost portion of their supply curves.