Upload
margaretmargaret-merritt
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chemistry 125: Lecture 28November 8, 2010
Communicating Molecular Structure in Diagrams and Words
Correct configuration is vital in drug molecules, like eribulin. It is important that chemists
agree on notation and nomenclature in order to communicate molecular constitution and
configuration. Clear notation also aids clarity of thought. The conventional 1891 Fischer
projection, which has been indispensable in understanding sugar configurations for over a
century, was invented in order to count stereoisomers. Ambiguity in diagrams or words has
led to multibillion dollar patent disputes involving popular pharmaceuticals. International
agreements provide descriptive, unambiguous, unique, systematic “IUPAC” names that are
reasonably convenient for most organic molecules of modest molecular weight. Also in 1891
Fischer devised the D,L “genealogical” scheme to describe relative configurations, but it can
be cumbersome or ambiguous.For copyright
notice see final page of this file
Preliminary
Discovery of E7389 Starting From the Halichondrin B C.1-C.38 Macrolide
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
HO
HO
MeO
O
H
H H
MeH
H
H
O O
OMe
OO
O
O
O
OO
Me
HH
H
H
H2N
OH
E7389halichondrin B C.1-C.38 macrolide
"In Vitro and In Vivo Anticancer Activities of Synthetic Macrocyclic Ketone Analogues of Halichondrin B"M.J. Towle, K.A. Salvato, J. Budrow, B.F. Wels, G. Kuznetsov, K.K. Aalfs, S. Welsh, W. Zheng, B.M.Seletsky, M.H. Palme, G.J. Habgood, L.A. Singer, L.V. DiPietro, Y.Wang, J.J. Chen, D.A. Quincy, A.DavisK. Yoshimatsu, Y. Kishi, M.J. Yu, and B.A. Littlefield, Cancer Res., February 1, 2001; 61(3): 1013-1021
SARActive Fragment
of Halichondrin B "Simplified" Versionof Active Fragment
became Drug CandidateE7389, now “Eribulin”
219 > 500,000 configurational isomers!
19 “stereogenic centers”Structure-ActivityRelationship Study
E7389 Phase III Nov 2008
(Nov. 3, 2009)(Nov. 7, 2008)(Nov. 3, 2010)
ClinicalTrials.gov currently has 98,100 trials with locations in 174 countries. (Nov. 3, 2010)
Lipitor
The world’s best selling drug ($10.86 billion in 2004)
A $10,000,000,000 Problem in Stereochemical Notation
Oct. 12, 2005
NEW YORK - Pfizer Inc. won a significant victory on Wednesday when a British judge upheld a key patent covering its blockbuster cholesterol drug Lipitor in the United Kingdom but the medication still faces a similar yet more important case in the United States.
Judge Nicholas Pumfrey upheld the patent covering atorvastatin, Lipitor’s active ingredient, but ruled that another patent was invalid. Indian pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. had challenged both patents, and was joined by Britain’s Arrow Generics Ltd. against the second patent that was ruled invalid.
Pfizer said the decision upholding the exclusivity of the patent covering atorvastatin until November 2011 was an important victory for scientists.
(Analogus decision 8/2/2006 in U.S. Court of Appeals)
…
What is Patented?single enantiomer (Lipitor, drawn in figure)
or racemate (described in text)
Number of permutations much greater than the
total number of protons, neutrons, and electrons
in the Solar system!
OH -OCa+2
F
O
i-PrH-N
(CH2)2
Opinion of Sir Nicholas Pumfrey
In my view, the claim covers the racemate and the individual enantiomers.
In the '633 patent, it is absolutely clear from context throughout that formula (I) is being used to denote a racemate. In my judgment, every time the skilled person sees formula I or formula X he will see it with eyes that tell him that in that racemate, there is a single enantiomer that is the effective compound, and that he can resolve the racemate using conventional techniques to extract that enantiomer.
In the '633 patent, it is absolutely clear from context throughout that formula (I) is being used to denote a racemate.
When one comes to claim 1, which echoes the purpose of the invention with its conventional reference to pharmaceutically acceptable salts, he will, in my judgment, continue to see the formulae in this light.
I X
Thus Pfizer’s later patent on the single enantiomer is an invalid repeat, and patent protection will run out three years earlier !
Eisai Research Institute
Constitutional Nomenclature Conventions
Geneva (1892)
Formal name should be:• Clearly Descriptive
• Unambiguous
• Unique
• Manageable
Unfortunately "Amide" means
both R2N- and RCONH2
(e.g. Quick, Easy, Short, Pronounceable)
Indexing Alternatives: composition, computer graphics
Composition, Constitution,Configuration, Conformation
IUPAC, International Unionof Pure & Applied Chemistryhttp://www.chem.qmw.ac.uk/iupac/http://acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature
One name one structure
One structure one name
i.e. Stereochemistry
Eribulin
Cl
Br
Systematic Constitutional Nomenclature
Choose the “Main Chain”for Greek Root Name
Number the Chain Atoms
Name Substituents
Alphabetize (& Count)
• Longest
• Most Substituents
• Lowest number atFirst Difference
Cl
Br octane
Cl
Br
12
132
34
56
7
7-bromo-2-chloro-3-ethyl-6,7-dimethylnonane
Cl
Br ?
3
(to give simpler names)
(1-chloroethyl)
methyl
methylbromo
ethyl
chloro
http://acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/93/r93_338.htm
WOW!
Thank God for pictures and computer graphics.
[ ]( )
Some Useful Non-Systematic Names
Isobutane Isopentane Neopentane
NeopentylIsopropyl sec-Butyl tert-Butyl
XX X
X
Nomenclature Drillavailable on course website.
Tartaric Acid Isomers
Configurational Nomenclature
Defined as “D”-glyceraldehyde (Fischer’s Guess)
m.p.[]D
140°C0°
170°C+13°
170°C-13°(meso) (dextro +) (laevo -)
Phenomenological
Multi-StepSynthesis
D-Tartaric AcidGenealogical (Fischer, 1891)
d-(+)-glyceraldehyde
HOCH2CH(OH)CHO
Relative (by synthesis) to
>2000 Compoundsin the 210 Tables
Problem for Monday:Consider HOMO/LUMO
alternatives during the reaction of HI with
1,3-butanediol to give 4-iodo-2-butanol
Paul D. Bartlettage 24
Absolute Configuration
J. M. Bijvoetvan't Hoff Laboratory, Univ. Utrecht
(1949-51)
Na Rb d-(L)-TartrateX-ray anomalous
dispersion
60 year old
Fischer Guessfor
(L)-Tartrate “The question of nomenclature is beyond the scope of our investigation... The problem of nomenclature now concerns given configurations, and requires a notation which denotes these configurations in an unambiguous and if possible self-explanatory way.” (Bijvoet, 1951)
Naming Double Bond ConfigurationMalic Acid
(HO2C)CH(OH).CH2. (CO2H)Maleic & Fumaric Acids
(HO2C)HC=CH(CO2H)
H
HOOC COOH
H H
HOOC
COOH
H
cis(on this side of)
trans(across)
H3C
H
CH3
COOH
cis or trans?
Absolute nomenclatureis hard to generalize
O OO
+ H2O
cistrans
(though relative is fine)
Double Bond Configuration
H3C
H
CH3
COOH
H3C
H CH3
COOH
Assign groups at either end "priority"by atomic number (or weight for isotopes)
at first difference
H3C
H
C
C
HOO
O
HH
H
H3C
H
C
C
HH
H
HOO
OO
O
(E)ntgegen (Opposed) (Z)usammen (Together)The names trans and cis are "polluted" by previous usage.
In Assigning PriorityProceed One "Shell" at a Time
(respecting previous decisions)
C
C
OO
O
HH
H
H
C
C
OO
O
CH
H
H
Cl
H3CCl
Tie
Win
Tie
Win
Cl is highin priority,
but irrelevant;the decision
is already made.
Cl
Cl
Robinson: "Hello Katchalsky. What are you doing here in Zurich?"
from V. Prelog, My 132 semesters of chemistry studies (1981)
The 1950s "CIP" Priority Scheme is Conventional
R. S.Cahn
C. K.Ingold
V.Prelog
Robinson: "Well then, if it is not wrong, it is absolutely unnecessary."
Robinson: "You know, Prelog, your and Ingold's configurational notation is all wrong."
Prelog: "Excuse me, Sir Robert, I am only Prelog, and I live here."
Prelog: "Sir Robert, it can't be wrong. It is just a convention. You either accept it or not."
R. Robinson R. B.Woodward
by p
erm
issi
on J
. D. R
ober
ts
Exercise for Monday:
Eadfrith’s Error
(Click here & create your very own chiral conventions)
http
://w
ww
.bl.u
k/on
line
gall
ery/
them
es/e
urom
anus
crip
ts/l
indi
sfar
ne.h
tml
CIP (R/S) Nomenclaturefor Stereogenic Centers
(S)inister (left)
COOH
COOH
OH
H
H
HO4
3
2
1
1
3
4
2
(2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic
acid
rightturn
H
(R)ectus (right)
H
HO D
CH3
H
leftturn
HO CH3
D
H
14
2
3
CH3 CH3
HO HODHHD
End of Lecture 28Nov. 8, 2010
Copyright © J. M. McBride 2009,2010. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).
Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.
Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .
Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.
The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0