Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Let’s Make a DealM&A Deal Structures that work
Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang
2
Road Map
1. Tax: Maximizing deal value
2. Deal timelines
3. Cross-border deals
4. Managing the process
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
1. Tax: Maximizing deal value foremployees and shareholders
¬ Assets vs. shares – determining factors
¬ Other considerations
¬ Capital gains exemption
¬ Employee options
¬ Non-compete payments
3
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
What is the difference between assetand share structure to shareholders?
4
5% 25%10%
A B C
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Assets vs. shares (cont’d)
¬ Asset sale
¬ Two tiers of income tax (corporate andpersonal)
¬ Need to allocate purchase price among assetsand assess each asset to determine net after-tax yield to vendor corporation
5
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Assets vs. shares (cont’d)
¬ Asset sale (cont’d)
¬ Need to determine the best way in which todistribute the proceeds of sale to theshareholders
¬ Tax-free accounts available?
¬ Timing of dividends - tax deferral advantage andoverall tax savings
¬ Winding-up corporation and distributingproceeds
¬ Withholding tax on non-resident shareholders
6
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Assets vs. shares (cont’d)
¬ Share sale
¬ One asset being transferred (shares) so noallocation of purchase price (unless multipleclass of shares)
¬ Assuming individual vendor, one tier of incometax (personal)
¬ Capital gains treatment
¬ Access to lifetime capital gains exemption($750,000)
¬ Tax treatment of deferred or contingent saleproceeds
7
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Assumptions
¬ 20 shareholders
¬ taxed at highest B.C. marginal rate
¬ 10 can access $750K CGE
¬ Target
¬ QSBC
¬ Sole asset is IP created by Target
¬ Buyer
¬ indifferent to share vs. asset purchase
¬ Disposition results in $50MM of gain at eithershareholder or target level
8
Asset vs. share sale – an example
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Asset vs. share sale – an example (cont’d)
9
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Share Sale
Capital gain $50,000,000
Aggregate CGE $ 7,500,000
Taxable capital gain (50)% $21,250,000
Tax (43.7%) $ 9,286,250
After tax proceeds = $40,713,750
10
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Gain $50,000,000 Non-taxable distribution fromCDA
$25,000,000
Taxable Income (50%) $25,000,000 Dividend distribution $18,807,500
Addition to CDA $25,000,000 Dividend Tax
Tax @ SBD rate (13.5%) $ 67,500 Eligible (25.78%)Non-eligible (33.71%)
$4,640,400$ 272,208
Tax @ regular rates (25%) $ 6,125,000
Net Corporate Income Tax $ 6,192,500 Aggregate Dividend Tax $4,912,608
Net amount available fordistribution to Shareholders
$43,807,500 After tax proceeds = $38,894,892
Asset Sale
Asset vs. share sale – an example (cont’d)
What is the difference between assetand share structure to shareholders?
11
5% 25%10%
A B C
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
12
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Tax status of
¬ Target¬ CCPC
¬ Shareholders of Target¬ Availability of CGE, RRSPs, Non-resident
¬ Purchaser¬ Indifferent to share vs. asset purchase
¬ Tax Rates
¬ Vendor
¬ Purchaser
¬ Shareholders of Target
Tax factors influencing structure?
Tax factors influencing structure? (cont’d)13
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Income generated from sale of assets
¬ Ordinary income
¬ Property
¬ Business
¬ Capital gains (or capital gains equivalent)
¬ Tax cost
¬ ACB and PUC of Target shares to shareholders ofTarget
¬ Assets of Target that are subject of sale
Tax factors influencing structure? (cont’d)14
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Availability of deferral
¬ Vendor stakeholders – Share sale
¬ Vendor corporation – Asset sale
¬ Tax assets in vendor corporation
¬ Existence of NOLs, ITC, CCA, CEC
¬ $750,000 CGE
¬ How many?
¬ Tax accounts
¬ CDA
¬ RDTOH
¬ GRIP
Hybrid Transaction
15
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Purchaser dictates asset sale transaction
¬ Value to vendor in accessing CGE
¬ Difference between after tax return on assetsale vs. share sale may be bridged by a hybridtransaction
16
¬ Individual resident in Canada is entitled to anexemption from tax on $750,000 of capital gainsrealized on the disposition of shares of a“qualified small business corporation”
¬ Trusts cannot claim the deduction but canallocate and designate amounts eligible for thededuction
Capital Gains Deduction - QSBC
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ A QSBC share must meet three tests:
¬the small business corporation test;
¬the holding period ownership test; and
¬the holding period asset test
¬ Subject to certain exceptions, ownership test requiresthe shares not to have been owned by a person otherthan the person claiming the exemption within 24 monthperiod preceding sale
Capital Gains Deduction – QSBC (cont’d)
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
18
¬ Discrete regime for the taxation of optionsacquired by persons in their capacity asemployees at law¬ includes directors
¬ excludes independent contractors
¬ Key considerations¬ any tax deferral on exchange of options
¬ any tax deferral on exchange of option shares forshares of purchaser
¬ availability of ½ deduction
Employee Stock Options
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
19
¬ CCPC Options¬ deferral of taxable benefit until sale of shares
¬ CCPC at the time of grant of options
¬ Other Options¬ no deferral of taxable benefit
¬ Withholding tax obligations
¬ ½ deduction¬ FMV options
¬ ½ deductions for CCPC Options¬ 2 year hold period
Employee Stock Options (cont’d)
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
20
¬ Manrell and Fortino held non-compete paymentsto be non-taxable receipts
¬ Proposed subsection 56.4(2) requires a taxpayerto include in income amounts in respect ofrestrictive covenants that are received orreceivable in the year by the taxpayer or a non-arm’s length person
Non-Compete Payments
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
21
¬ Joint election for “capital gain” treatment foramounts related to the disposition of an “eligibleinterest” provided that multiple conditions aresatisfied
¬ Shares of a corporation that carries on abusiness to which the restrictive covenantrelates or shares of a holding corporation where90% of their value is attributable to eligibleinterests in one other corporation
Non-Compete Payments (cont’d)
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
22
Shareholder
100%
Opco
Shareholder
100%
Holdco
100%
Opco
Eligible InterestIneligible Interest
Opco 2
LP
Non-Compete Payments (cont’d)
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
2. Deal timelines23
NDA(s) 1st Drafts
Preparation
& Contact
Preliminary
Negotiations
Post Closing
Payments
(Adjustments)
Consents
& Approvals
Agreement
Negotiation
LOI
(if any)
Sign Agreements
Buyer Due Diligence with Seller Staged Disclosure
Closing Final
Payments
Disclosure Schedules
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Structures
¬ Share Purchase Agreement
¬ Asset Purchase Agreement
¬ Merger/Amalgamation
¬ Plan of Arrangement
¬ TO Bid (exempt or otherwise)
24
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
25
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Which deal structure has the shortesttheoretical timeline?
Shares Plan*Assets
A B C
*Plan means Plan of Arrangement
¬ Facts that Impact Structure
¬ cross-border with non-cash consideration
¬ exchangeable share structure otherwise Target investors pay tax withoutliquidity event
¬ securities compliance on both sides of the border
¬ perception of significant liabilities within Target
¬ share purchase not likely
¬ favours asset deal with less desirable tax result for Target investors,which ideally leads to price adjustments
¬ time constraints (e.g., target running out of money)
¬ favours Share Purchase
Structures (cont’d)
26
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
27
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Facts that Impact Structure (cont’d)
¬ cap table including number of investors and theiramenability
¬ large number of investors or intractable investors means Share Purchaseimpractical
¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement
¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or othersecurities
¬ favours Plan of Arrangement
¬ value in revenue generating contracts to Buyer¬ commercial paper important including assignment/change of control,
termination, release of source code and trailing obligations
¬ if commercial paper generally has “no assignment” but not “change ofcontrol” clauses then Asset Purchase less likely
Structures (cont’d)
Which deal structure has the shortesttheoretical timeline?
28
Shares Plan*Assets
A B C
*Plan means Plan of Arrangement
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
29
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Deal timelines
Shares
Assets
Plan
SignAgmt +10 +20 +30 +40 +50
Close
Close
+60 days
Interim Court
Approval
Shareholder
Approval
Final Court
Approval
Close
3. Cross-border deals: Complicationswith non-cash purchase price
30
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Tax complication of receiving consideration thatincludes shares of a foreign corporation
¬ receiving illiquid stock
¬ no automatic or elective tax deferral
¬ Exchangeable share structure
¬ Main purpose of exchangeable share structure is todefer tax until Canadian shareholder has a liquidityevent (e.g. can sell the shares received in lieu of cash)
Exchangeable Share Structure31
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Main characteristics of exchangeable share structure
¬ Purchaser establishes Canadian acquisition corporation(“Exchangeco”) and owns all common shares and all votingrights of Exchangeco.
¬ Canadian shareholders sell their shares of target inconsideration that includes exchangeable shares ofExchangeco.
¬ Exchangeable shares are exchangeable at option of holderinto shares of the non-resident Purchaser.
¬ Purchaser establishes a Callco to acquire the exchangeableshares from the holder.
¬ The holders of exchangeable shares will, contractually, haveeconomic rights equivalent to those enjoyed by holders ofshares of the non-resident Purchaser (e.g., dividend or otherdistributions, voting).
3. Cross-border deals: Complicationswith non-cash purchase price
32
What percentage of proceeds needs to be in cash to
cover tax liability?
12.5% 43.7%21.8%
A B C
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
33
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)
Canada
Foreign
Non-residentPurchaser
Holders ofES
Former Holders ofES (after exchange)
Shareholders ofPurchaser
CommonShares
(all voting)
ES acquired uponexchange
ExchangeableShares
Callco
Exchangeco
Target
Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)
34
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
¬ Canadian shareholders benefit from “roll-over”provisions as they continue to hold shares in aCanadian corporation. A joint election would berequired to be filed by Exchangeco and eachshareholder
¬ Whether Canadian shareholder can obtain a full orpartial tax deferral is dependant on the amount of cashproceeds and cost base of share of target. Fullydeferred if cash proceeds is less than or equal to costbase
¬ Canadian tax is triggered when exchangeable sharesare exchanged for shares of foreign parent corporation.Amount of tax is calculated at the time of the exchangebased on the then prevailing fair market values
35
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)
What percentage of proceeds needs to be in cash to
cover tax liability?
12.5% 43.7%21.8%
A CB
Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)
¬ Who pays the incremental cost of structure?
¬ Purchaser?
¬ Tax benefit of deferral – better ROI
¬ Balance between cost of structure vs increasedROI
36
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
4. Managing the process
¬ Three variables
¬ Money
¬ Time
¬ Scope
¬ Touch any one and the other two are affected
37
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Base Deal38
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Added Services as % of Base Deal Costs
39
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Specialty Plan Exchangeable Shares
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
Reducing Deal Costs
¬ Target prepares due diligence site
¬ Target starts disclosure schedulesimmediately after comments on first draft ofagreement
¬ Planning, extra internal staff, frequentcommunications, scheduled closing
¬ Most important: Strong internal project/dealmanager
40
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
41
Questions and Discussion
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797
VANCOUVERSuite 1300, 777 Dunsmuir StreetP.O. Box 10424, Pacific CentreVancouver BC V7Y 1K2Tel: 604-643-7100Fax: 604-643-7900Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
CALGARYSuite 3300, 421 7th Avenue SWCalgary AB T2P 4K9Tel: 403-260-3500Fax: 403-260-3501Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
TORONTOBox 48, Suite 5300Toronto Dominion TowerToronto ON M5K 1E6Tel: 416-362-1812Fax: 416-868-0673Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
MONTRÉALSuite 25001000 De La Gauchetière Street WestMontréal QC H3B 0A2Tel: 514-397-4100Fax: 514-875-6246Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
QUÉBECLe Complexe St-Amable1150, rue de Claire-Fontaine, 7e étageQuébec QC G1R 5G4Tel: 418-521-3000Fax: 418-521-3099Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711
UNITED KINGDOM & EUROPE125 Old Broad Street, 26th FloorLondon EC2N 1ARUNITED KINGDOMTel: +44 (0)20 7786 5700Fax: +44 (0)20 7786 5702
42
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797