42
Let’s Make a Deal M&A Deal Structures that work Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang

Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Let’s Make a DealM&A Deal Structures that work

Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang

Page 2: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

2

Road Map

1. Tax: Maximizing deal value

2. Deal timelines

3. Cross-border deals

4. Managing the process

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 3: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

1. Tax: Maximizing deal value foremployees and shareholders

¬ Assets vs. shares – determining factors

¬ Other considerations

¬ Capital gains exemption

¬ Employee options

¬ Non-compete payments

3

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 4: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

What is the difference between assetand share structure to shareholders?

4

5% 25%10%

A B C

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 5: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Assets vs. shares (cont’d)

¬ Asset sale

¬ Two tiers of income tax (corporate andpersonal)

¬ Need to allocate purchase price among assetsand assess each asset to determine net after-tax yield to vendor corporation

5

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 6: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Assets vs. shares (cont’d)

¬ Asset sale (cont’d)

¬ Need to determine the best way in which todistribute the proceeds of sale to theshareholders

¬ Tax-free accounts available?

¬ Timing of dividends - tax deferral advantage andoverall tax savings

¬ Winding-up corporation and distributingproceeds

¬ Withholding tax on non-resident shareholders

6

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 7: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Assets vs. shares (cont’d)

¬ Share sale

¬ One asset being transferred (shares) so noallocation of purchase price (unless multipleclass of shares)

¬ Assuming individual vendor, one tier of incometax (personal)

¬ Capital gains treatment

¬ Access to lifetime capital gains exemption($750,000)

¬ Tax treatment of deferred or contingent saleproceeds

7

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 8: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

¬ Assumptions

¬ 20 shareholders

¬ taxed at highest B.C. marginal rate

¬ 10 can access $750K CGE

¬ Target

¬ QSBC

¬ Sole asset is IP created by Target

¬ Buyer

¬ indifferent to share vs. asset purchase

¬ Disposition results in $50MM of gain at eithershareholder or target level

8

Asset vs. share sale – an example

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 9: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Asset vs. share sale – an example (cont’d)

9

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Share Sale

Capital gain $50,000,000

Aggregate CGE $ 7,500,000

Taxable capital gain (50)% $21,250,000

Tax (43.7%) $ 9,286,250

After tax proceeds = $40,713,750

Page 10: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

10

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Gain $50,000,000 Non-taxable distribution fromCDA

$25,000,000

Taxable Income (50%) $25,000,000 Dividend distribution $18,807,500

Addition to CDA $25,000,000 Dividend Tax

Tax @ SBD rate (13.5%) $ 67,500 Eligible (25.78%)Non-eligible (33.71%)

$4,640,400$ 272,208

Tax @ regular rates (25%) $ 6,125,000

Net Corporate Income Tax $ 6,192,500 Aggregate Dividend Tax $4,912,608

Net amount available fordistribution to Shareholders

$43,807,500 After tax proceeds = $38,894,892

Asset Sale

Asset vs. share sale – an example (cont’d)

Page 11: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

What is the difference between assetand share structure to shareholders?

11

5% 25%10%

A B C

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 12: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

12

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Tax status of

¬ Target¬ CCPC

¬ Shareholders of Target¬ Availability of CGE, RRSPs, Non-resident

¬ Purchaser¬ Indifferent to share vs. asset purchase

¬ Tax Rates

¬ Vendor

¬ Purchaser

¬ Shareholders of Target

Tax factors influencing structure?

Page 13: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Tax factors influencing structure? (cont’d)13

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Income generated from sale of assets

¬ Ordinary income

¬ Property

¬ Business

¬ Capital gains (or capital gains equivalent)

¬ Tax cost

¬ ACB and PUC of Target shares to shareholders ofTarget

¬ Assets of Target that are subject of sale

Page 14: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Tax factors influencing structure? (cont’d)14

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Availability of deferral

¬ Vendor stakeholders – Share sale

¬ Vendor corporation – Asset sale

¬ Tax assets in vendor corporation

¬ Existence of NOLs, ITC, CCA, CEC

¬ $750,000 CGE

¬ How many?

¬ Tax accounts

¬ CDA

¬ RDTOH

¬ GRIP

Page 15: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Hybrid Transaction

15

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Purchaser dictates asset sale transaction

¬ Value to vendor in accessing CGE

¬ Difference between after tax return on assetsale vs. share sale may be bridged by a hybridtransaction

Page 16: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

16

¬ Individual resident in Canada is entitled to anexemption from tax on $750,000 of capital gainsrealized on the disposition of shares of a“qualified small business corporation”

¬ Trusts cannot claim the deduction but canallocate and designate amounts eligible for thededuction

Capital Gains Deduction - QSBC

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 17: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

¬ A QSBC share must meet three tests:

¬the small business corporation test;

¬the holding period ownership test; and

¬the holding period asset test

¬ Subject to certain exceptions, ownership test requiresthe shares not to have been owned by a person otherthan the person claiming the exemption within 24 monthperiod preceding sale

Capital Gains Deduction – QSBC (cont’d)

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 18: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

18

¬ Discrete regime for the taxation of optionsacquired by persons in their capacity asemployees at law¬ includes directors

¬ excludes independent contractors

¬ Key considerations¬ any tax deferral on exchange of options

¬ any tax deferral on exchange of option shares forshares of purchaser

¬ availability of ½ deduction

Employee Stock Options

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 19: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

19

¬ CCPC Options¬ deferral of taxable benefit until sale of shares

¬ CCPC at the time of grant of options

¬ Other Options¬ no deferral of taxable benefit

¬ Withholding tax obligations

¬ ½ deduction¬ FMV options

¬ ½ deductions for CCPC Options¬ 2 year hold period

Employee Stock Options (cont’d)

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 20: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

20

¬ Manrell and Fortino held non-compete paymentsto be non-taxable receipts

¬ Proposed subsection 56.4(2) requires a taxpayerto include in income amounts in respect ofrestrictive covenants that are received orreceivable in the year by the taxpayer or a non-arm’s length person

Non-Compete Payments

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 21: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

21

¬ Joint election for “capital gain” treatment foramounts related to the disposition of an “eligibleinterest” provided that multiple conditions aresatisfied

¬ Shares of a corporation that carries on abusiness to which the restrictive covenantrelates or shares of a holding corporation where90% of their value is attributable to eligibleinterests in one other corporation

Non-Compete Payments (cont’d)

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 22: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

22

Shareholder

100%

Opco

Shareholder

100%

Holdco

100%

Opco

Eligible InterestIneligible Interest

Opco 2

LP

Non-Compete Payments (cont’d)

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 23: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

2. Deal timelines23

NDA(s) 1st Drafts

Preparation

& Contact

Preliminary

Negotiations

Post Closing

Payments

(Adjustments)

Consents

& Approvals

Agreement

Negotiation

LOI

(if any)

Sign Agreements

Buyer Due Diligence with Seller Staged Disclosure

Closing Final

Payments

Disclosure Schedules

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 24: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Structures

¬ Share Purchase Agreement

¬ Asset Purchase Agreement

¬ Merger/Amalgamation

¬ Plan of Arrangement

¬ TO Bid (exempt or otherwise)

24

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 25: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

25

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Which deal structure has the shortesttheoretical timeline?

Shares Plan*Assets

A B C

*Plan means Plan of Arrangement

Page 26: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

¬ Facts that Impact Structure

¬ cross-border with non-cash consideration

¬ exchangeable share structure otherwise Target investors pay tax withoutliquidity event

¬ securities compliance on both sides of the border

¬ perception of significant liabilities within Target

¬ share purchase not likely

¬ favours asset deal with less desirable tax result for Target investors,which ideally leads to price adjustments

¬ time constraints (e.g., target running out of money)

¬ favours Share Purchase

Structures (cont’d)

26

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 27: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

27

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Facts that Impact Structure (cont’d)

¬ cap table including number of investors and theiramenability

¬ large number of investors or intractable investors means Share Purchaseimpractical

¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement

¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or othersecurities

¬ favours Plan of Arrangement

¬ value in revenue generating contracts to Buyer¬ commercial paper important including assignment/change of control,

termination, release of source code and trailing obligations

¬ if commercial paper generally has “no assignment” but not “change ofcontrol” clauses then Asset Purchase less likely

Structures (cont’d)

Page 28: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Which deal structure has the shortesttheoretical timeline?

28

Shares Plan*Assets

A B C

*Plan means Plan of Arrangement

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 29: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

29

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Deal timelines

Shares

Assets

Plan

SignAgmt +10 +20 +30 +40 +50

Close

Close

+60 days

Interim Court

Approval

Shareholder

Approval

Final Court

Approval

Close

Page 30: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

3. Cross-border deals: Complicationswith non-cash purchase price

30

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Tax complication of receiving consideration thatincludes shares of a foreign corporation

¬ receiving illiquid stock

¬ no automatic or elective tax deferral

¬ Exchangeable share structure

¬ Main purpose of exchangeable share structure is todefer tax until Canadian shareholder has a liquidityevent (e.g. can sell the shares received in lieu of cash)

Page 31: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Exchangeable Share Structure31

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Main characteristics of exchangeable share structure

¬ Purchaser establishes Canadian acquisition corporation(“Exchangeco”) and owns all common shares and all votingrights of Exchangeco.

¬ Canadian shareholders sell their shares of target inconsideration that includes exchangeable shares ofExchangeco.

¬ Exchangeable shares are exchangeable at option of holderinto shares of the non-resident Purchaser.

¬ Purchaser establishes a Callco to acquire the exchangeableshares from the holder.

¬ The holders of exchangeable shares will, contractually, haveeconomic rights equivalent to those enjoyed by holders ofshares of the non-resident Purchaser (e.g., dividend or otherdistributions, voting).

Page 32: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

3. Cross-border deals: Complicationswith non-cash purchase price

32

What percentage of proceeds needs to be in cash to

cover tax liability?

12.5% 43.7%21.8%

A B C

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 33: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

33

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)

Canada

Foreign

Non-residentPurchaser

Holders ofES

Former Holders ofES (after exchange)

Shareholders ofPurchaser

CommonShares

(all voting)

ES acquired uponexchange

ExchangeableShares

Callco

Exchangeco

Target

Page 34: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)

34

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

¬ Canadian shareholders benefit from “roll-over”provisions as they continue to hold shares in aCanadian corporation. A joint election would berequired to be filed by Exchangeco and eachshareholder

¬ Whether Canadian shareholder can obtain a full orpartial tax deferral is dependant on the amount of cashproceeds and cost base of share of target. Fullydeferred if cash proceeds is less than or equal to costbase

¬ Canadian tax is triggered when exchangeable sharesare exchanged for shares of foreign parent corporation.Amount of tax is calculated at the time of the exchangebased on the then prevailing fair market values

Page 35: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

35

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)

What percentage of proceeds needs to be in cash to

cover tax liability?

12.5% 43.7%21.8%

A CB

Page 36: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Exchangeable Share Structure (cont’d)

¬ Who pays the incremental cost of structure?

¬ Purchaser?

¬ Tax benefit of deferral – better ROI

¬ Balance between cost of structure vs increasedROI

36

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 37: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

4. Managing the process

¬ Three variables

¬ Money

¬ Time

¬ Scope

¬ Touch any one and the other two are affected

37

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 38: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Base Deal38

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 39: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Added Services as % of Base Deal Costs

39

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Specialty Plan Exchangeable Shares

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 40: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

Reducing Deal Costs

¬ Target prepares due diligence site

¬ Target starts disclosure schedulesimmediately after comments on first draft ofagreement

¬ Planning, extra internal staff, frequentcommunications, scheduled closing

¬ Most important: Strong internal project/dealmanager

40

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 41: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

41

Questions and Discussion

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797

Page 42: Cheryl Slusarchuk, TJ Kang · ¬ favours Merger/Amalgamation or, more likely, Plan of Arrangement ¬ complexity of options, warrants, shares or other securities ¬ favours Plan of

VANCOUVERSuite 1300, 777 Dunsmuir StreetP.O. Box 10424, Pacific CentreVancouver BC V7Y 1K2Tel: 604-643-7100Fax: 604-643-7900Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

CALGARYSuite 3300, 421 7th Avenue SWCalgary AB T2P 4K9Tel: 403-260-3500Fax: 403-260-3501Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

TORONTOBox 48, Suite 5300Toronto Dominion TowerToronto ON M5K 1E6Tel: 416-362-1812Fax: 416-868-0673Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

MONTRÉALSuite 25001000 De La Gauchetière Street WestMontréal QC H3B 0A2Tel: 514-397-4100Fax: 514-875-6246Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

QUÉBECLe Complexe St-Amable1150, rue de Claire-Fontaine, 7e étageQuébec QC G1R 5G4Tel: 418-521-3000Fax: 418-521-3099Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

UNITED KINGDOM & EUROPE125 Old Broad Street, 26th FloorLondon EC2N 1ARUNITED KINGDOMTel: +44 (0)20 7786 5700Fax: +44 (0)20 7786 5702

42

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca / October 2012 / Docs #11872797