Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHM.'TBR III
h~ricultural ?roduction
As th3 bulk of the state revenue nas der:i. ved from agriculture
it was its constant endhvour to encourage the expansion of agricul-'
ture as well as to improve the c~ ... opping system. Since the irriga
tion facilities uere insufficient in this region, cultivation
depended mostly on the rain , The kharif crops almost entirely
depended on rains 't7hereas limited irrigation facilities in the form
of 17ells~ tanks, and nalas uere available for the cultivation of .rill _/
crops. :Agriculture depended on the timaly arrival of the monsoon &
Due to the uncertainty of rains there 17as a considerable seasonal
and yearly variation in agricultural production./ The ,Pargana offi
cials were especially instructed to send reports about the conditions
of rainfall in their respective parganas.
The arhs&ttas provided extremely useful information on some of
the problems regarding the pattern of agricultural production and
changes in it during the period under review. The present study is
based on an examination of the arhsattas of six contiguous !lantanas
of Swai Jaipur, Bahatri, Chatsu, l.:alarna, Dausa and Lalsot from 1750
to 1780. Hor.ever, the arhsattas are not available in continuous
series and in soma cases there are certain gaps. The records are
rarely available after 17 80.
The following information in the arhsattas has been used to study
the pattern of agricultural production.
1) Proportion of the revenue realized from kharif and rabi harvests.
2) Area assessed according to the zabti system, the rate of revenue
per bigha and the total amount collected per crop.
3) Total revenue reali?.i9d in kind according to the batai .iinsi
system~ the sale price of the revenue realized :tn kind per crop
and the total value (in money) of revenue realized in kind
per crop.
93
But there are certain serious limitations in analysing this
information. Apart from the fact that the continuous series of the
arhsattas is not available and that in some cases gaps are conside
rable, the arhsattas of all J!arganas are not available for common
years.
Secondly, detailed information is given only for the khalisa
villages, excluding the villages given in i.jara. There are seasonal
as well as year to year fluctuations in the number of khalisa villages
and those granted in !_jara.. /);.n unprecedented increase in the grant
of i.iara in khalisa territory during the period under study further
makes it difficult to analyse the information regarding all khalisa
Vi lleges.
Another serious difficulty involved in utilizing the statistical
information of the arhsattas is that the figuras given under the zabti
and .. 1insi cannot be compared n1 th each other. Throughout the period
under revieu the system of assessing certain crops under the zabti
system and of others under the batai .iinsi system continued. The
.zabti figures do not proVide information about the yield per bigha,
the price of the crop and int!idence of taxation in terms of total
produce. In the batai ~iinsi figures, generally the quantity of pro
duce realized as reveme is given alongside the sale price of the
portion soldf though sometimes the total produce, cropwiss produce
and the quantity demanded as revenue are also given. The arec. socrn
and tho rate of demand per ~h~a in kind is not mentionede Thus it
is difficult to compare these tuo Eats of figures and consequently we
94
donot get any direct information either r.agarding the total area
cultivated or regarding the total quantity produced.
~stly, there were many difficult years which also include the
period of present study. In these years agricultural production was
adversely affected due to devastation of agri.cultura by the lJarathas
ana famines etc. The arhsattas ar3 not available :for the period
after 17 80. Thus the information at our disposal for normal years
does not enable us to put :fornard a complete picture regarding the
pattern of agricultural production during the parid of study. H0\'2'
ever, an attempt has been made to find out trends of agricultural
production using linear regression analysis by least square method
for fitting the best average estimated trend.
It may be argued that in the presence of some abnormal years
how a reliable trend could be worked out. However, the fact is that
the effect of random fluctuations in all the time series taken in
the present study will be smoothened out by the inherant property
of the least square ~ethod. This m2thod ensures the least sums of
squares of deviation of the actual and estimated valueso Hence the
higher and lower values of the random element uill be averaged out.
Three different variables have been examined to study the
pattern of agricultural production. These variables are (a) per
centage of area under each crop, (b) percentage of revenue derived
from each crop, and (c) the proportion of revenue realized in the
kharif and the rabi harvest.
The average yield per bigha and the area under each crop have
been "Uorked out by adopting the methodology as given by S. 1\ilrul
95
Heoe.n, :r.N. Hasan and s.Po Gupta ill t1'"3ir article 0 Patte:;:-n o:f e.grio.•
cul'iiura.l production in the territories of L\mber (c. 1650-1750) 11•1
Fortunately, during the pa::.:-:locl under revieu, most of the important
_.jinsi crops uers frequently ascassed in part eccortiing to tlw zo.bti
ayste m. Thera fore, it has been possible to uo!"k out the area unde~
a11 major crops. The estimate rega!'ding total acreage under each
crop is not entirely accurate sinco it is based on assumptions;
still it provtdes a possible mst11od for determining the crop pattern
and changes t1ilich took ple.ce in 1 t during the period under studyo
By this method the proportion of area unde!" differant crops
has been uorked out (see pie diagrams shouing th3 percentage aree
devoted to each crop) separately for kharif and.!.!!:!!! crops. If t~·e
compare the crop pattera s ~;-:el.l as E:~jor changes in it by taking
into account the p3 rcentaga of revonue from diffeL'3nt crops and tile
percentage of eroa under diffel"3nt crops tbn the:ra are som3 verla-,
tions in the case of ool'l!9 c:;.-ops. On the uhole,hooowr, the results-
a!'$ almost identical cccording to bo·th the es·~imates. The prlnn:tpal
crops t:ere as follm1o:
liha;rif: The cost important .jins:l crops t1ere bajra, jet:ars pulsesf
moth, uro and mungo Among the zabti crops cotton, sugarca.D.3~ malds:e.,
and chola, uer0 the most significanto In pargana Malarna, Bahatrl
and Chatsu kodon T'tas also a very important crop 0 other zab"!ii crops
r.ai"3 n:S.ndt:o, vegetables~ gutJar, indigo, opium, tobacco, paddy, san
1. S.I.r. Hasan, K.N. Hasan, SoP. Gupta nThe pattern of ~l"icultu re.J. production in the terri tol'""les of J\mber {c. 1650 .. ·1750} n. nrc, llysoro, 1966, pp. 244-64. Also cf. s.P. Gupta ttLand revm0 system in Eastern Rajaotllan (c. 1650-1750) ", unpubli ahec1 the sie Aligarh i..:-usl:'..:~ Univ:a::si,..;y~ 197~ (By courtesy o:r the author.)
96
(hemp) coarse grain such aa kuri, kagni, varti, ralo, rajgaro and
rotiko, (in ~argana suai Jaipur~ Bahatri and Dausa) ajauain (~argana
Lalsot), potato (pargana Bllthatri and !Jalarna) while other ,1insi crops
l':"ere til and sali. But these crops did not have a significant place
in the scheme of agricultural production. Perhaps their cultivation
'"las restricted simply for local consumption.
Rabi: In the .!!!:E,!, zabti crops did not occupy a significant place
except in R!;rgana !:alsot where all the major .D!h! crops t7ere asses-~
sed predominantly ace ording to the zabti system. The principal
,.iinsi crops were barley, uheat and gram and mixed crops such as
vejhri, gojro and goohani. Other .iinsi crops were the pulses arha.r
and masur and oilseeds sarson8:ld alsi, but their cultivation ":18.S
fairly re strictecl. The zabt:t crops of the rabi ssason l"lere vegG-
tables, vegetable gram, kakri, musmalon, uaternrelon, tobacco, opium~
khatli~ lahalro (in pa:rgana Malarna} and aj~ain (pargana Swai Ja.ipur).
But these Ci'Ops were of marginal importance. HOl7ever, in )?argana
Chatsu chomli was a very significant zabti crop.
The most iaportant changes in the pattern of agricultural pro-
duct:ton in the kharif uera increase in the cultivation of sugarcane
and decline in the cultivation of cotton, indigo, chola, and coerss
grains such as ma.nduo, kuri, varti, ralo etc. Other significant
change in the crop pattern of kharif harvest uas a corzasponc'iing
decrease in the cultivation of moth and other pulsss and increaro
in the cultivation of bajra, jwar and makka. ~cline in the cult::
vation of moth suggests that it was replsed by bajra~ makka and
j0t1ar as a staple food of the masses. In the rabi the most signi
ficant change r:as a :relative declin3 in the cultivation of barley
97
and mixed cTops with e corresponding incraase in the cultivatio!l o·:.:
wb2e:i.i and g;.:-am. Th.a pattern of change in the agricultural produc.-.
tion in diffarent ~anas by considering the parcentage of area
/' 1 ~~t:.:)' ~ undezo different crops is as follm::ss · ~
:? 4'U!Gl:\NJ:.. ::.t:j i..S Of
Kha r i .n .1.
Year Cotton Sugart- Bo.jra. r.1o'iih l!a.Ith:a Chole. Gur.ar cane
1751 15.71 4.:.25 8.as 51.04 0.92 3.70 4e42
178"1 5.0-6 11.2-G 11 .:to 9.1"{ 2 0 89 3.15 5.50
-67~ ·:·164~ ·:·32~ ... saS) ·:.214)) -1-e% ·:·26$)
R a b :t.
Year ~.nea'Zi Barley Gram
1751 22.7~ 4:9 .SG G.31
i78"{ 65.60 30.89 1 0 8''1
·:·189~ -38~ -56.61~
Kharif
Yeer Cotton ::r- Bajra Moth Makka Chola Gtmar J(A'Jar Til 1&m.dwo
1~(56 5.13 0.69 18.60 33.39 12.~2 16.01. 3.48 1.74 3.15 3.8S
17'10 13.4!1 1.90 17.49 35.89 9.05 9.14 3.56 4.77 0.77 0 0 91.
·:-162~ -t·175~ -5~ ·:·7~ -27% -42~ ·:·2 .30~:-168% -75~ --76~
Rab :t.
YeaE" :.n.eat Bm.-ley Gram 1756 :t~.59 82.13 1.84 1770 20262 56.67 . 20.98
-:-41% -31% ·:·10.40~
1. The positive valueo indicating the in.O:z'38&3 and 1:3gat:lva vc.luca indicating the decraat~o
98
K h a r i f
Cotton Sugar- Bcj~u ~oth Year caua Ma.kka Chela JOl:"ar ]?eddy Kurt Varti
1752 11.~1 2.73 9.28 51.84
1775 9.76 5.41 17.98 33.49
10.05
12.15
2.27
0.47
·:-21~ "'.'{9~
R a b i
Year t'heat Bar let 1752 23.81 55.53 1780 34 .. 95 47 .. 28
·=·56% ~-14 ,..86%
J?ARG.ii.NA DlitJSA
Kha r i f
Year Cotton Ba.ira Moth l:!akka
1759 11.52 21.59 39.14 5.78
1789 1.22 47.51 24:.59 0.4~
-89~ <·i2~ -37% -91~
R a b i
Year t'hes:~ Bar lei
1759 15.42 76.97
1789 33 ... 44 52,..58 I
.;.116~ -31.,692i
Khari:t
7,21 0.99 12.07
14.22 o.o9
.;.-97.23" ... 79~
Gra~
18.23 9.94
-4:5 .. 47~
Chola Jonat 13.42 12.92
5.64 11.46
-s~r~ -11.30$)
Gram 4.56
7 ~:21
-:.58,..11%
Year Cotton ~:~r- Bajra Moth Makka Chola J<mar Til
--------------------1751 o.ss 0.92 23.93 55.88 1.07 0.25 17.27 4.34
1784 ,1,.06 3,37 65.67 5,~ .. 5 1.56 15.94 2,,97 ·:·63~ ·:·2261£ ~·139~ ~["{r:f.
- t4 -t1 .46% -7. 70?! -31 5'11 o . L.
R a b i
Year t'heat Barle~ Gram 1751 22.57 64.80 8.b5 1788 IJ,i £92 21,55 32,84:
• 84 L .. (~ ... , ;i; o.;,: 1.J -3:!..7~ -279.65~
99
The average yleld pel .... bigha in different J?arQ:anas for those
crops "hich were assessed both according to the zabti as nell as
the bat a,. Jins...i system has been worked out by assuming that the
zabt& rates uero calculated on the basis of one third of the total 1 produce. /ilthough this mathod is not entiraly accurate since it
is based on assumptions it io still the only possible mathod for
calculating roughly the average yield per bigha., ~ ~rusal of tlw
table I shoving average yield per bigha for soma crops
reveals that except in the ce.s3 of _P.argana Snai Jaipur whera thare
is an overall increase in productivity, in other R!rganas there is
no oignificant change in the productivity.
The only common denominator V1itich can be used to study the
relative position of each crop is th value of raveme realized fzoom
1 t in terms of money o Although this mathoa give a a tentative idea,
its limitations do not p3rmi t us to examine the crop pattern and
changes in it entir3ly on tha basis of this mathodo The psrcentage
of rawnue xealized from each crop can be examined on the basis o:f
figures given fOE" the entire kb.alisa villages in the J?argana,.4
But
the difticulty invol~d in this ~thod is that the number of khalisa
villages in a .e:mana fluctuated from season to season and from yeaA ...
to yearo Henne it is not possible to get inforJr.ation for the sa.ma
villages throughout the period. The more apPropriate mathod is to
select so10 villages as samples and then to examill3 the revenue
:t.--ealizaG. Zrom dif1erent crops in all the sample villages. A feu
villages have been salected hero as samples though it is difficult
io See S.N. Hasan, K.No Hasan and S.P. Gupta nThe pattern of agricultural production .. o .. ~~.~ ~ cit .. 1 pp. 24:6.
100
to say hot7 reprasentative tmse vlllages aN.
Furthermore? the revenue rates par bigha charged under sabt:l
varied from year to year and th~ra existed different rates per bi&ha
even in indiv!dual villages. Homverp cash I'3VGnue rates per bi.gha
demanded for zabti crops did not fluctuate considerably from year to
to year. It is difficult to say whether the zabti system of assess
ment uas more advantageous to the psasants aa th9re was a dat7nt7ard
trend in the price level. This may be the raason why the ,..iinsi
formed the bulk of the state revenue during the period under ravieu
(see table II and graphs sho:ring the xnrcentage of revenue
realized in cash and kind).
For the ,..1insi crops the 2'3Venua figul'3s can not necessarily be
regarded as reliable for determining the crop patterno The prices
of jinsi crops fluctuated from year to year and it is not possible
to ascertain t7hather the variation in the revemte deri vad from dif·~
ferent ,..1insi crops in different years was due to any increase or ,
decrease in tlt3 e.rea devoted to each crop ox due to price fluctua--=
tion. 1\t th3 sam.s tims crop to Cl"OP variation is found in respect
of the share of the state uithin the same J?&FfU!.na though the average
rate of l"3venue remain.ad more or less constant baring a few abnomaJ.
years. Th3 innidence of revenue on ,..1insi cxops uas about 23~ highGr
in kharif than in rabi,
'F.ae relativa position of the cxops in kharif and !:!E.! derived
from the :p3rcentage 01 revenue from each crop has been shovn by thG
h~.stograms. Histograms may be presented l7i th frequencies exp:;:a s.cod
:i.n absoluts quantities or as paroentages of the total frequemy :tn
tm clistrl butionc
101
Because of the gaps in cate t!3 have cboosen different inter
vals for different namanes in vur histograms.
Ue have cctegortzed khartf crops into three groups:; ~ly
cash crops, food crops end pulcas. The cash crops include cotton,
sugarcane, oil seeds, hemp, indigo and tobacco. In the :rood crops
bajra, makka, jouar, paddy, sali and coarse grainslike kcdon,
kagni, vart1, ralo, gararo and manduo have been included. In the
third category we have included moth, I!!llng, urd and chola. Ho'.7ever,
for ~ana Chatsu vegetables fi~ been put into a separate category.
The ~ crops have also been classified into three groups - food
crops uhich include wheat, barley and gram and mixed crops which
include vejhri, gojro, goohani and goji. For J:argana Chatsu chomli
bas been put into a separate category. The third group consists
of oilseeds which include sarson and alsi etc. The trend ot the
pa rcentage of revenue from individual crops can be observed from
the table III shot:ing the p5reentage of revenue de rived froa ee.ch
The deviation in the ~rcentage of revenue derived from
different categorte s of crops in khartf and .!!:!1_ has been shm;n
in histograms prepared separately for each pargana·11 The rate of
deviation from one to another class interval for each group of
crops in different parganas can be observed from histog::a.'"ams.
The best·estimated tre~d has been fitted by using linaazo
regression analysis which is being shown by a straight lins in
the figure. By this straight line ue can observe the average
estimated trend of the concerned variable and further ue can
predict the behaviour of the "':~riable.
102
The graphs of this temporal movement in the percentage of
revenue derived from dif:Zerent categories of crops do not sh01.1
auy psculiar nonlinearity an:i hence a linear trend has been worked
out for all categories of crops using the linear relationship of
the form Yc = a ·:· bx uhere Y the endogenous variable is the per
centage of revenue from each crop, x, the exogenous variable is
tin:.e a is a constant showing the average initial level
p9 roentage of revenue from crops. Ylhi le b, the slope ,
shous the average rate of change in the :percentage of revenue ui th
respect to time. The value of a and b has been uorked out by
using tha follouing equation.
S: Y = Na -:. b:f.x
2: x Y = a 't:;r. -:· b~ x2
Tile results of the above :ragression analysis are given in
the :rollouing table s
Values of Cro~ Paxgana ::.:alsot
Inter- Reg res-Kharif cept sion co-
efficient a b
Cash crops 39.52 -:-1.86x
Food-crops 30.03 --Q25x
Pulses 26.82 -1.12x
Rabi Food-
crops 93.10
Mixed-cl~opo
Choml:•.
O:t lseeG.s
rsgresaion constants nau
Inter-cept
a
22.12
39.56
32.58
90.25
s a Regres-sion co-efficient
b
-1.34:x
-:4 .sOx -2 .sOx
-0.97x
-o.ssx
Suai
Inter-cep't
a
56.99
40.70
89.01
6.22
Jai;12ur Reg res-sion co-efficient
b
·:A.82x
-3 .S7x
-3.32x
-o.oax
103
values of !"3 g r3 ss i or:1: constants
'Ji Ra .. lNt,
Cro~ chat s u Ba.hat t" i Ma 1 a rna
Inter-itegret:J- _ _ -r"egre o-
Inter-Reg l~\Js=--
sion co- J.nte .,...... sion co sion co ... K!1ari.f cept efficient cept ef1icie;t cept efficien·t
a b e. b a b
Cash-crops 20.75 ·:.0.58x 24.71 .;.o .61x 20.83 ~0.94:9:z:
Food-crops 40.90 -:·1. 60x 47.53 -0.71x 60.35 -:-1.20x
Pulses 38.18 --2 .98x 28.27 -1.67x 20.17 -2.43x
~
Food-crops 83.86 -2.77x 93.31. -:-0.36x 86.89 .... 0.32x
M1.xed-crops 7.65 -0.4:5x 7.58 <·0.462x
Chomli 12.03 -:-1.95:z:
Oilseeds 31 ·>0.089x
CrOJt Kharif 9asba Lalsot Village ~:~d- Qasba Chatsu Qasba Malarna
a ')) a 'b e. b a b
Cash-crops 59.93 -2.26x 47.10.
Food- .... crops 22.18 ~2.26x 15.06
?uises 13..1'83 -0.40x: 28.19
Vege-tables
Rabi Food ...
crops 99.20 -o.~ox 94.27
Choml:l
!ilixec1-crops
·:·1 .99x 25.66 -:-0.99x 15.27 ·~2.51x
·:·1.91x 24.48 ·>0.56x 70.50 -0. 70x
-1.92x 15.13 -:r3.08x 8.02 -0.82x
16.84 -1.68x
<·0. 87x 5 .17 -0 .17x 94.00 n2 .~6x
104
The categories of crops for r.hich the regre saion c oofficient
shows positive value reveals il'!Creasing trend and the crops for
·which it shocrs negative value indicates downuard trend. Thus on
the basis of above follouing changes in the crop pattern can be
noticed in kharif,
Cash CroJ2.!!. There is an increase in the percentage of revenue
derived from cash crops in all pa~ana.s only Tlith the exception
of pamana Dausa where it decreased. This increase is more marked
in case of pargana Swai Jaipur and Lalsot. In other three parganas
the increase is marginal. Among the cash crops cotton and sugar
cane occupied the predominant position and there is an increase
in the percentage of revenue from sugarcatre. (See table III sh0\7ing
the percentage of revenue from each crop). However, there is a
slight decrease in the pgrcentage of revenue from cotton. Other
cash crops i.e. indigo, hemp, tobaoco and opium did not occupy
any significant place in agriculture and it appaars that their
cultivation uas fairly restricted and t1as for local consumption.
Food Crops: The position of food crops is some uhat fluctuating
during the period under study. There is a substantial increase
in the percentage of revenue from food crops which corresponds
with a decrease in the percentage of revenue from pulses. Thera
is a marginal increase in the percentage of revenue from food
crops in pargana Chatsu and Malarna. However, ths pgrcentage of
revenue from food crops sh0l7s a slight decrease in pargana Lalsot,
Bahatri and Buai Jaip-..tr uhere innrease in the percent"age of cash
crop is part icu 1 arly marked. ('
Among food crops the increase is
*"
105
conspicuous for bajra, jouar and makka though in varying degrees.
(see table III) In pargana Suai Jaipur there is a marginal dec
line in the percentage of revenue from. makka and bajra folloued
by an increase in the percentage of jm:rar. In pargana Bab.atri
there is an increase in the percentage of bajra and jouar whereas
the percentage from ma.kka and paddy shows a dec line. In J?argana
Malarna the percentage from bajra increases and there is a decrease
in the percentage of jouar and makka. Honever, in J?argana Chatsu
the percentage of revenue from bajra, and in Dausa the percentage
from makka, jowar and bajra shol7s an increase. In pargan.a Lalsot
there is an increase in the p8rcentage of revenue from bajra and
makka \7hereas the percentage of jouar shows a d0l111V7ard trend. There
is an overall decline in the p3rcentage of revenue from coarse
crops like kodon, ralo, varty, kuri kagni and mandwo etc.
Pulses: There is an overall decreass in the percentage of revenue
from pulses in almost all ~arganas and the decrease is most marked
in the case of moth.
Rabi: The most significant changes in the percentage of revenue
from~ crops is an increase in the percentage from wheat and
gram with a corresponding decrease in the percentage from barley
(see table III). The percentage from mixed crops also shows a
dotrJ:r.l'lard trand. There is an increase in the parcentage from food
crops in ;parganas Bahatri, Lalsot, Malarna and Sl"!ai Jaipur. ~ ..
dacrease in the percentage from food crops is found in ;earganaa
Chatsu and Dausa. The other changes in the zabi include a decrease ii?- the percentage from chomli in p.J!:mana Chatsu and increase from oilseeds in pargana }~lama.
The changes in the crop pattern and shift among major crops
106
from one to another have been studied on the basis of psrcentage
of revenue derived from diffe~nt crops in sEllllple villages. The
sample villages have been taken from }2arganas Chatsu, Lalsot,
1r1alarna and Dausa 0 Further we have tried to find out the corre-
lation betueen the psrcentage of total revenue and individual
crops (see graphs shot71ng the changes in crop pattern in sample
villages). The first thing nhich can be noticed from the graphs
is the decreasing trend of total :revenue in all _-parganas both in
the kharif and in the rabi.
It uould appear from the graphs that in J!!rgana Lalsot in the
kharif among the cash crops there is an increase in the percentage
of revenue from sugarcane and a decrease in cotton. In the food
crops there is an increase in the percentage of revenue from bajra
and decrease in makka and ydlse moth. Thus there is a shift from
cotton, ma.Kka and moth to sugarcane and bajra.
In the k:har!f there is a positive correlation between the
percentage of revenue from bajra and the total revenue, whereas
in the case of makka the relationship is negative. Tne behaviour
of other crops is independent uith relation to the total revenue.
In the case of pargana Dausa the most significant change in
the crop pattern is a decrease in the percentage of revenue from
bajra l7hich was compensated by an increase in jol7ar, makka and
cotton. Among the cash crops sugarcane, houever, did not occupy
any proportionate plane in this pargana. There is no significant
change in the position of moth uhich is positively correlated nith
the total revenue. There is no apparent correlation between the
total revenue in the kharif and other crops.
The pattern of change in the case of }2argana Malarna is, hol:
ever, someubat fluctuating from the initial level to the final
period. There is a shift in 1758 from bajra and sugarcane to joT:a:r
107
and in 1761 sugarcane increases at the cost of jowar and bajra.
Again in 1764 the pattel'"n undergoes a change and there is a shift
from sugarcane to jouar and bajra. After that there is a decraase
in food crops and increase in sugarcane and til. In the final
stage, there is a clear shift from jowar to bajra followed by an
increase in the relative position of tilo There is no correla-
ti on between the total revenue and other crops.
In parg_ana Chatsu position of bajra iooreases considerably at
the cost of makka and moth Which finally decline. Cotton uhich was
the major cash crop in the pargana also shows a slight decline.
The pulses mung and urd had positive correlation with the
total ravenue upto 1764, after that bajra coincided uith the total
revenue. The behaviour of other crops is independent ui th the
total revenue.
In the kharif among the cash crops, position of sugarcane
improved in pargana ZAlsot and that of cotton in ;eargana Dausa. \f(;'
On the whole, there is a de£!_ease in the pa rcentage of revenue from·~~~
cash crops uhich is most marked in the case of cotton which was the
most important cash-crop. Among the food crops there is a shift
towards bajra at the cost of makka, jcmar and pulses.
In the ,!!!!! the most significant change in the crop pattern in
all four pamanas is a shift from barley to uheat. The position of
gram varied in these pamanas., In pamana Lalsot it shows no
improvement, in the case of J?argana Malarna the percentage of
revenue from gram in the final stage shous declina whereas in
Pargan.a Chatsu it shous an increa89. Another change in the rabi
is a decline in the poai ti on of mixed crops in )?!rgana :.!alarna and
108
that of chomli in P.arga~~ Cnatsu.
In the rabi in pargan~f! Lalsot and Chatsu there is no appa
rent correlation betueen the total revenue and individual crops.
In pargana ltla.larna barley and mixed crops are positively correla
ted ui th the total revenue, uheraas the behaviour of wheat is quite
independent, In the case of /)amana Dausa the total revenue and
barley are positively correlated whereas 11heat had negative corre
lation with tb total revenue. The relationship betneen wheat and
barley is also n.egati ve.
The relationship betueen the percentage of revenua from all
crops separately in kharif and rabi has been uorked out on the
basis of corr3lation which studied the degree of co-variability
betr.een tuo variables X and Y nama ly in this case the percentage
of revenues of all crops from kharif and rabi, The degree and
nature of re la.ti onsh:tp betueen these tuo variables have fUrther
been exami ns d.
On the basis of correlation formula used for finding the co
efficient of correlation betYieen the variables ue have arrived at
the fol10l7ing conclusions on the pargana and village basis. The
foliomng formula has been used in finding the Earl Pearson's
coefficient of correlation: ~x Y- ~x£.y
r = N
l<ix2- (cz..x)2 JY2 -(£y )2 \1 N T
:.ne ra N = 1\Tumbe r of years • The value of r varies N-2 The ta st of significance usad here is t = rp
. 1...-.l--degrees of f~edom.
from ..... 1 to ~ .. :t.
for (N-2}
The following results haw been found after the required
calculations:
PARGANA r
Malarna -:-.666(Y-:·
Chat su ·!· • 39 54:
Suai Jaipur -.1600
Bahatri -.2462
Dausa -.0636
lalsot -.3356
Qasba Lalsot
Chandseni
Qasba !.Ialarna
Qasba Chatsu
Interpretation of coefficient of correlation:
r
-.2949
-:-.6060*
-. '1636*
-:...2012
10~
Coefficient of correlation for a given pair of variables lies
between ?1 (perfect positive correlation) and -1 (perfect negative
correlation) '\7hen:f.t is zero it indicates complete absence of
correlation.
The regularity of the relationship between the revenue from
kharif and .r!!!1 is found to be quite unstable in the region, as
the relationship is positively significant only in pargana 1Ia.larna
and village Chandseni and negatively significant in .Qasba Malarna.
Thus this inductive approach does not premit us to make any strong
generalisations about the relationships between the revenue from
kharif and rabi.
The proportion of revenue realized in the kharif and the .!!!!.!
has been u or ked out by applying the method of linear regression
using least square method for fitting the best estimated trend
shoun by a straight line which reveals an increase in the percent
age of revewe realized in the kharif. r:e kno\7 general equation of
a straight line for fitting the trend is: Yc= a·:·bX. The result
* Significant at 5%.
110
for all six parganas is as follm1s:
values of :L'ag~ss:ton constant for kharif
Pargana Intercept Regression c oafficient
e. Suai Jaipur 23.85 v 2.89X
Bahatrl 50.40 -:. 0.25X
Lalsot 36.85 -=· 2.65X
Malarna 48.97 v 2.57X
Chatsu 31.4:6 -:. 1. 75X
Dausa 40.85 -:. 0.68X
It is interesting to note that in all six parganas there is o
proportionate increase in the percentage of revenue derived in the
kharlf though it varied in degree in different parganas. The
seasonal fluctuations in the revenue are also noticeable, l7hich
can be attributed mainly to geographical factors such as uncer
ta.inty of rainfall or to some extent to natural or man made cala
mi ties. However, on the uhole the estimated trend in the kharif
revenue shows an overall increase.
The trend for kharif reveals the complemantry trend for rabi.
For example we have calculated the estimated trend of revenue for
kharif and rabi for pargana. Suai Jaipur. For kharif the estimated
trend equation comes out to be Yc = 23.85 + 2.89X and for rabi
Yc = 16.16 - 2.89X. The value of b for kharif is -:·2.89 and for
.r.abi it is exactly equal and opposite i.e. -2.89 uhich n:eans that
in kharif the trend is increasing and in.!!!!.!. it is decreasing
ui th the sa~r.e magnitude.
It has been workedout by Dr S .P. Gupta that prior to this
period there was a proportionate increase in the psrcentage of
111
revenue derived in rabi as compared to that in kharif. 1 This in
crease has been attributed to investment in agricultura. But de
crease in the revenue derived from rabi as compared to kharif in
our period does not seem to be due to any deep seet':ied reasons. The
study of sample villa;ges also raveals identical trend with that for
pamanase The sharp fall of revenue in rabi uas due to disturbeG.
conditions created by the 1Iarathas who invaded this region most of
the time during winter season. The revenue in rabi in some years
declined firstly due to devastation of agriculture by the 1Iarathas
and secondly, since the conditions uere unstable and the agricul
tural production in rabi needed sonre investment for better returns
psrhaps capital was not avai !able for production in rabi and there
uas no inc.entive on tlw part of peasants to invest more in rabi
season out of the fear of plu!!dexs by the Marathas.
D'J.e to seasonal and yearly fluctuation in the number of khalisa.
v1llages, the Jlargana figures of the arhsattas are not helpful for
ascertaining uhether there "Was an increase or decrease in the over
all agricultural production. Houever, a few villages from pargana
Chatsu, Malarna, Lalsot and Dausa have been selected as samples to
study the trends of production. As we have noted earlier that the
amsattas do not provide figures either or the total quantity pro
duced or the total area 4&ocrn. Tne only possible mathod to study
the increase or decrease in the production is to examine the amount
collected as the share of the state from crops. It has been assuirad
that the incroase or decrease in the total am<ru.nt of mal
1. S.::?. Gupta's unpublished th9sis Goc, cit., p. 61. ~:.lso cf. S.N. Hasan, K.N. Hasan and S.P. upta, "The pattern of agrlcultural ~roduction •••••• n loc. cit.,,pp. 248.
112
would represent the trend of produotion as a whole. Tne percen
tage of increase or decrease in the amount Of !!!.!.! in the sample
villages have been calculated by tald.ng different base years for
different J>arganas, It is not possible to select sanre common years
for all sample villages as the years for which data is available the
are not uniform in/case of all villages. Tne trend has been uorked-
out by using regression 'coefficient 11!9thod. The results are as
follows:
Pargana Regression Coeffioient of Remarks coefficient correlation
Ma.larna -143,95 0.500 Significant at 10%
Lalsot -215.27 0,882 n 5%
Dausa - 40.39 0.6040 " 5% Chatsu ~· 5,96 0,0359 Insigni fie ant
It uould appear from the calculation that thers r.as no increase in the
the share of/ state in the sample villages uith the exception of
some villages of J!Lrgana Chatsu uhich sho\7 an increase. Since the
there \'tdS no increase in the share of/state it has been assumed
that the agricultural production also did not increase.
Among the sample villages the decrease in agricultural pro
duction is most marked in 9.asbas uhich were the centres of rural
industries, The decline in the production of contm3roia1 cl. .. opa
which uere processed for manufacture must have affected the rural
trade and the condition of artisans. Hol"lever, the impact of
decline of agricultural production on the rural industries during
the period under study needs a further investigation.
113
~-On the \7hole the overall production decreased in this region
during the period of present study due to disturbed conditions
created by tb Uarathas accompanied by rapid famines. Under such
conditions any further development u<r.Jld have hardly been possible.
This l7as perhaps one of the factors of growing poverty of the
peasants and their indebtedness. v~/
Yea:r Paddy Guwar Jowar
1752 9.4 1.2 5.8
1754 6.4
1756 3.9 1.5 1.8
1758 3.3 4.4
1759 5.5
1761 5.0
1766
1767 9.0 2.4
1768
1783
TABLE I
Ave raee yield per bi gba
Pargana Bah at ri
Til Moth Bajra
2.1
1.7
1.4 1.0 0.7
1.6 2.6 2.6
2.9
1.4
3.0
2.1 4.0
,Jheat Barley Gram
4.4 8.3
3.5
1.9
4.9
7.8
1.8
7.8
1.5 8.7
Cont'd ••• Table I Average yield per bigha
!>argana Chat su
Year Guwar
1752 1.9
1758 2.0
1764 1.5
1766 2.4
1767 2.1
1768 2.8
1771 1.5
1774 2.8
1779 1.3
1782 2.2
115
Cont 'd ••• Table I Average yield per bigha
Pargana Dausa
Year Til Gu\7nr Sali Uoth Ba,jra Barley \:beat Gram Sarson
1754 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.4
1760 4.2 3.8 1.9 1.8
1762 6.5 4.6
1764 5.3 4.3 3.6 2.4
1765 2.3 4.5 5.0
1768 2.7 4.6 3.8
1769 1.9
1770 1.8 2.9 0.8 3.8 3.5 1.7
1772 1.3 3.9 2.8 2.9
1774 8.5
1776 2.2 2.4 2.6 4.0 2.8
C ont 'd ••••• Table I Average yield per bigha
Pargana Lalsot
Year Ba,jra Barle~ rue at Gram Til Sarson :loth Jowar Sali
1751 2.7 3.3 2.4
1752 3.0 3.0 2.4 2.3 1.9 0.9
1753 2.3 2.6 2.2 1.7 o.s 1754 2.! 1.7 1.5 1.9
1755 1.6 1.3
1756 2.5 1.7 1.2 2.3
1757 2.0 2.5 1.7 2.2 1.1 2.3
1758 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.6 2.3
1759 2.3 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.4
1761 2.0 2.7 3.4 2.5 1.7
1762 2.7 3.2 2.2 2.6 0.5
1763 1.9 2.4 1.9 1.9 1. 7
1764 2.1 2.4
1765 3.0 3.9 2.3 2.2 3.8 2.3
1767 3.8 4.6 4.1 4.6 1.8 1.0
1768 5.4 3.4 1769 4.7 1770 2.4 2.7 2.6
~ 1777 2.6 3.1 3.0 1.7 ~
-....j
c on t 1 d • • • • Tab le I Average yield Eer bigha
Pargana ~.Ialarna
Year Guwar Ba.jra Til Jowar Barley Gram 1~'ll~ ~:t
1751 4.5 4.3
1754 2.2 3.4 4.4 1.1
1756 0.9 1.2 0.8 1.4
1757 3.2 1.8
1758 2.8
1759 2.6 3.2 2.4
1760 1.4
1761 . 2.2 2.4 1.4 3T7 3.5
1762 2.2 6.4
1763 2.0 7.5
1765 4.4 2.2 5.5
1766 5.5
1767
1768 7.0 2.2 5.8 5.8
1769 5.0
1782 2.5 ~ ~ 00
C ont 1 d •••• Table I Average yield per bigha
?argana Swai Jai~
Year Makka Cbola Bajra Jowar Sali Til Indigo Guwar Moth Barley \The at Sarson
1756 1.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 2.5 0.8 0.2 0.7 4.0 3.4
1757 2.8 1.1 1.3 1.7 3.4 1.0 0.2 1.8 0._4 3.8 2.8
1759 2.9 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.4
1760 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.1 0.4 1.6 0.4 5.0 2.6
1761 1 .5 1.5 2.7 1.1 1.9 2.3
1762 5.5 2.3 4.3 1.2 2.2 0.4 3o3
1763 2.9 1.2 1.1 4.1 1.0 1.8 0.4 1.1
1764 3.3 1.1 3.2 1.4 1.3 2.0 2.3 c-
1765 2.8 1.8 1.0 8.7 1.7 2.5 3.6 4.4
1766 8.3 2.1 1.9 7.3 6.3 3.3 4.2
1767 8.2 2.6 2.1 7.7 2.8 1.0
1769 12.7 2.9 5.4 1.9 3.0 4.3 5.7 6.6
1770 1.9 1.9 6.7 2 .1 2.5 1.2 3.0 2.8 5.8
120
Proportion of Revenue from Kharif and Rabi Harvests
Pargana Bahatri
Year " of Total Revenue ~ of Kharl f Rave nue % of Rabi R0 venue
Kharif Rabi &bti Jinsi Zabti Jinsi
1752 55.07 44.93 43.70 56.30 5.26 94.74
1754 33.44 66.56 63,94 36~06. 3.83 96 .1~!
1756 49.64 50.36 45.26 54.74 7.59 92.41
1758 55.98 44.02 46.12 53.88 5.91 94.09
1759 67.28 32.72 30.45 69.55 2.69 97.31
1761 43.60 56.40 43.89 56.11 5.84 94.16
1765 46.78 53.~2 44.16 55.84 6.23 93.77
1766 52.73 47.27 55.26 44.74 5.10 94.90
~757 66.35 33.65 41.15 52 .. 85 3.67 96.33
1775 39.04 60.96 46.12 53.88 2.80 97.20
1783 6.96 93.04
121 Cont 'd ••• T A B L B II
Proportion of Revenue from Kharif and Rabi Harvests
_fargana Chatsu
Year % of Total Revenue % of Kharlf Revenue ~ of Rabi Revenue Kharif Rabi Zabti Jinsi Babti Jinzi
1751 39.58 60.42 39.16 60.84 29.29 70 0 71
1752 35 .o3 64.97 82.35 17.65 14.47 85.53
1753 46.93 53.07 86.66 13.34 33.29 66.71
1756 21.45 78 0 55
1757 29.55 70.45 26.81 73.19 14 0 02 85.98
1758 52.97 47.03 49.05 50.95 13.09 86.91
1760 33.21 66.79 35.69 64.31 ~.73 91.27
1761 30.86 69.14 55.15 44.85 17.00 83.00
1762 35.40 64.60 56.28 43.72 22.66 77.34
1763 42.97 57.03 48.52 51.48 11.43 88.57
1764 28.27 71.73 32.74 67.26 10 .• 43 89.57
1766 4.0 .49 59.51 29.23 70.77 12.09 87.91
1767 44.56 55.44 31.36 68.64 15.15 84.85
1768 39.88 60.12 28.61 71.39 20.08 79.92 1769 57.36 42.64 .f:5 .10 54.90 28.41 71.59 1771 35.10 64.90 27.83 72.17 18.25 81.75
1773 - 48.47 51.53 1774 59.91 40.09 51.29 48.71 37.21 62.79 1779 57.86 42.14 oa
1782 39.59 60.41 56.68 43.32 25 .oo 75.00 1787 - 66,15 33.85 1788 39.79 60.21 -
122 Cont 'd •••• T 1\ B L E II
Pro;eortio,n of Revenue from Xbarlf and Rabi Harvests
}?argana Dau sa
Year % of Total Revenue 2S of Kharif Revenue 2& of Rabi Revenue
Kharif Rabi Zabti Jinsi Zabti Jinsi
1759 53.52 46.48 70.44 29.56 29.19 70.81
1760 40.13 59.87 41.6il 58.35 19.80 80.20
1765 44.97 55.03 54.67 45.33 59.93 40.07
1769 35.95 60.05 49.30 50.70 57.32 42.68
1770 39.45 60.55 14.60 85.40 46.05 53.95
1772 23.61 76.39 33.80 66.20 41.74 58.26
1775 46.17 53.83 46.61 53.39 49.59 50.41
1776 57.09 42.91 43.99 56.01 30.71 69.29
1789 48.59 51.41 14.67 85.33 5.46 94.54
123 Cont'd ••• T /-. B ::, E II
Proportion of Revenue f::·om Tihari:f and Rabi Harvests
Pargana Lalsot
Year p· of. To;t.al ~venue ,& of lihari .. f Revemt!_ 2! of Rabi Revenue Kharif Rabi 8abti Jinsi Zabti Jinsi
1751 30.12 69.88 6'1. 93 32.07 96.09 3.91
1752 51.06 48.94 67.51 32.49 51.39 4:8.61
1753 46.56 53.44 ~,2 .eo 27.40 94.92 5.08
1754 45.68 54:.32 64.96 35.04 91.50 8.50
1755 38.82 61.18 68.4-0 31.60 98.41 1.59
1756 37.87 62.13 76.60 23.40 99.00 1.00
1757 40.21 59.79 69.34: 30.66 99.38 0.62
1758 52.91 47.09 59.82 4:0.18 96.90 3.10
175~ 38 •. 68' G1 •• tl2 8t: .,.52 18._4,6 98.02 1.98
1761· 45.34: 54.66 74:.95 25.05 too.oo
1762 30.18 69.82 85.62 13.38 88.55 11.45
1~{63 40.59 59.41 66.82 33.18 96.59 3.41
1764 42.45 57.55 71.48 28.52 98.96 1.04
1765 38.24 61.76 75.29 24.71 99.17 0.83
1767 31.80 68.20 77.31 22.69 97.86 2.14
1768 50.04 49.96 76.45 23.55 95.95 4 .. 05
1769 89.83 10.17 80.11 19.89 10.06 89.94:
1770 53.73 46.27 77.94 22.06 94.04 5.96
1777 58.17 41.83 88.95 11.05 87 .oo 13.00 .
1779 77.10 22.90 -~::78"1 39.69 60.31 75.14 24.86 69.97 30.03
124 Cent 1 d ••••• Tb.BLE II
Proportion of Revenue fro~ Kharif and Rabi Harvests
Pamana Malarna
Year ,& of Total Revenue $& of Kharif Revenue % of Rabi Reverme Kharif Rabi !Gabti cJinsi ~abti Jinsi
1751 61.42 38.58 c 65 t . 90.35 4.03 95.97
1754 41.83 58.17 22.58 77.42 2.23 97.77
1756 49.80 50.20 9 .1"/ 90.83 0.68 99.32
175'1 52.16 47.84 9.13 '90.87 0.63 99.37
1758 65.45 34.55 18.48 81.52 4.18 95.82
1759 57.28 42.72 21.04 78.96 9.88 90.12
1760 4:0.42 59.58 21.23 78.77 0.4:4: 99.56
1761 62.71 37.29 32.76 6•t .24 9.16 90.84
1762 43.05 56.95 19.90 80.10 1.71 98.29
1763 63.48 36.52 16.58 83.42 14.64 85.36
1765 67.35 32.65 7.72 92.28 3.95 96.05
1766 - 1~.80 85.20
1767 52.07 47.93 19.4:5 80.55 0.93 99.07
1768 69.01 30.99 11.85 88.15 3.47 96.53
1769 57.94 42.06 33.08 66.92 0.94 99.06
1774 - 2.12 9~.88
1775 50.66 49.34 12.91 87.09 11.65 88.35
1776 61.70 38.30 10.34 89.66 1.32 98.68
1777 88.25 11.75 19.95 80.05 7.04 92.96
1778 37.51 62.49 18.24 81.76 2.33 97.67
1779 - 17.65 82.35 ... 1782 15.07 84.93 1784 14.86 85.14 4.28 95.72 1788 _!)_ ~ n,.,. oo
125 Cont 'd •••• T i:.. B :~ I: II
,!'roportion of Revenue froa Ialarif and Rabi Harvests
Pargana Swat Jaipur
Year ~ of Total Revenue ~ o:? IDlari f Revenue ~ of Rabi Revenue
Kharif Rabi Zabti Jinsi Zabti Jinsi
1756 25.58 74.42 51.12 48.88 1.64: 98.36
1757 23.89 76.11 44.99 55.01 1.88 98.12
1759 53.70 46.30 44.17 55.83 3.65 96.35
1760 35.38 64.62 44.96 55.04 2.08 97.92
1761 27.81 72.19 66.15 33.85 2.11 97.89
1762 28.53 71.'i:7 71.48 28.52 1.87 98.13
1763 24.11 75.89 61.36 38.64 1.84: 98.16
1764 22.51 77.49 48.74: 51.26 1.94 98.06
1765 30.75 69.25 64.4.9 35.51 2.41 97.59
1766 29.81 70.19 46.96 53.04 2.42 97.58
1767 50.89 49.11
1769 51.00 49.00 62.40 37.60 5.98 94.02
1770 36.05 63.95 48.30 51.70 2.74 97.26
Cont'd ••• Table II
Year
1751
1752
1753
1756
1757
1758
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764:
1766
1767
1768
1769
1771
?roportion of rovenue in Rharif ~nd Ral?J ~arvests in sample villages
P.ARG.ANl;:. CHATSU
~age of total "age of Kharif ~e of Rabi Revenue Revenue Revenue
ICharif Rabi Zabti J1nsi ~bti Jinf.ii
29.66 '10 .34 16.64 83.36 46.45 53.-55
4:0.03 59.91 24.43 '15.57 20.40 79.60
<::6.79 53.21 92.11 '1 .89 46.92 53.08
18.16 B1o84 100.00 4:5.71 54.29
29.56 70.44 36.92 63.08 24:.25 75.75
42.68 57.32 38.49 61.51 17.91 82.09
43.09 56.91 18.82 81.18 89.15 10.85
36.12 63.88 42.38 57.62 32.25 67.75
33.53 66.47 55.62 44.38 49.46 50.54
35.82 64.18 49.86 50.14 20.98 79.02
28.37 71.63 32.69 67.31 16.99 83.01
36.85 63.15 26.71 73.29 15.79 84.21
38.35 61.65 28.05 71.95 16.41 83.59
32.08 67.92 22.95 77.05 16.33 83.67
56.69 43.31 58.33 41.67 21.68 78.32
35.28 64.72 25.34 74.66 15.31 84:.69
126
Cont 'd •••• Table II
~roportion of re~nuG £roa Kharif and Rabi
ha~sts in sample villages
PARGANA DAU~M.
"age of total ~e of Khar!f %age of Rabi Revenue .i.:....: VG <1US Revenue
Year IOlarif Rabi ---zaliti Jinsi Z&bti Jinsi
1759 61.68 38.32 13.44 86.56 12.65 87.35
1765 44.62 55.38 45.58 54.G2 37.95 62.05
1769 56.94 43.06 35.47 64.53 34.81 65.19
1770 53.39 46.61 34.05 65.95 40.27 59.73
1771 53.05 46.96 18.57 81.G3 22.34 77.66
1772 22.43 77.57 30.65 69.35 20.74 79.26
1775 43.24 56.76 43.73 56.27 33.40 66.60
1776 57.57 42.43 42.51 57.4:9 38.91 61.09
1777 40.86 59.14 31.01 68.99 10.59 89.41
1789 60.37 39.63 19.20 so.so 33.51 66.49
127
Cont'd ••••• Table II
,lroportion of revenue f:com Eharif and Rabi harvests
~n sample vllla.ges
128
S'age of total ~age of ll:htt;d.f %age of Rabi · Revenue rt~venuo Revenue
Year Khartf Rabi Zabti Jinsi Zabti Jinsi
1753 55.13 44.87 80.79 19.21 97.76 2.24
1754 48.80 51.20 66.39 33.61 95.31 4.69
1755 58.70 41.30 41.35 58.65 92.71 7.39
1756 49.35 50.65 56.24 43.76 99.67 0.33
1757 40.95 59.05 70.73 29.27 99.75 0.25
1758 36.20 63.80 84: .1'1 15.83 100 .oo
1759 43.08 56.92 82.27 17.73 99.96 0.04:
1761 54.88 45.12 78.61 21.39 99.97 o.o3
1762 38.24 61.76 90.91 9.09 97.81 2.19
1763 40.34 59.66 82.19 17.81 100.00
1764 29.25 70.75 76.31 23.69 100.00
1765 41.03 58.97 79.80 20.20 98.81 1.19
176"'{ 24.70 75.30 86.91 13.09 100.00 Cl
1768 50.84 49.16 94:.98 5.02 100.00
1769 88.92 11.08 68.03 29.97 76.54 23.4:6
1770 53.30 46.70 67.74 32.26 96.90 3.10
Cont t d ••••• Tabla II 129
Year
1751
1754
1756
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1775
1776
1777
1778
~ortion of revenue from Kharif and Rabi harvests in samp13 vlllag!.,!
1'.,age o:t total %age ot 1\h&:t.~ ~age of nab:i.. Revenue Revenue l!Gvenna
miari:f Rabf Zcbti Jinai ~iabti Jinsi
50.92 49.08 7.11 92.89 1.05 98.95
34.50 65.50 1f: .89 86.11 0.25 99.75
70.43 29.57 4.40 95.60 0.13 99. 8,.{
69.79 30.21 9 .1'"( 90.83 1.28 98.72
73.35 24.65 9.64: 90.36 18.28 81.72
28.32 71.68 24.23 75.77 1.14 98.86
59.16 40.84 20.98 79.02 0.54 99.46
52.81 47. 19 9.11 90.89 0.33 99.67
55.25 44.75 10.4:1 89.59 0.93 99.07
75.31 24.69 6.33 93.67 0.55 99.45
82.23 27.77 6.97 93.07 0.83 99.17
61.08 38.92 5.58 94.42 1.74 98.26
76.14: 23.86 5.37 94.63 0.56 99.44
58.33 41.67 44.43 55.57 0.32 99.68
46.03 55.97 18.77 81.23 2.36 97.64
69.44 30.56 6.58 93.42 7.15 92.85
79.84 20.16 12.82 87.18 7.25 92.75
30.25 69.75 28.31 71.69 2.81 97.19
TABlE III
l?a:rgana Bahatri
Percentage of Revenue derived from each crop (Kharif)
Year Sugar- Cotton cane Til Makka Jowar Bajra Varti Kodon Paddy Chola Moth Urd Mung
1752 5.48 17.92 14.21 10.8 7.59 1.21 0.19 2.36 1.91 21.95 10.15 2.53
1754 11.93 26.30 1.36 18.74 8.44 6.19 1.28 0.38 2.03 0.89 14.02 4.13
1756 3.94 10.12 0.35 16.06 38.28 7.58 5.56 1.04 0.08 0.51 10.11 1.26 0.31
1758 4.98 16.44 1.50 8.31 21.15 10.76 3.83 0.44 1.60 21.71 2.60 2.29
1759 3.79 9.20 1.65 6.33 29.03 9.75 5.15 0.41 o. 78 2.40 14.80 10.59 2.4:3
1761 5.82 9.97 2.38 11.65 12.43 18.36 8.02 0.74 0.17 1.32 10.69 9.87 2.49
i•tss 5.81 19.16 2.05 12.21 30.59 11.36 2.52 0.09 0.97 1.68 7.86 3.03 -1766 10.32 30.67 1.05 5.84 15.15 6.87 1.14 0.49 0.85 3.09 14.76 6.32 0.56
1767 13.03 9.79 0.99 2.88 25.71 8.75 0.53 0.03 0.64: 1.81 20.78 9.95 0.30
1772 20.43 10.03 6.72 10.77 13.60 4,.34 13.60 3.45 1775 9.47 13.31 0.16 15.64 15.80 20.14 0.10 0.21 13.70 3.58 0.49
131
Cont 1d •••• ~argana Bahatrl
Percentage of Revenue derived from each crop (Rabi)
Year Wheat Barley Gram Ve.1hri
1752 21.98 65.45 5.88 4.88
1754 17.07 67.12 6.10 8.03
1753 11.05 81.65 3.15 1.15
1756 11.81 82.94 2.72 o.so
1758 9.28 83.90 2.81
1759 12.32 73.39 10.64
1761 26.10 65.13 4:.22 1.49
1765 26.65 52.54 10.91 3.42
1766 28.70 52.54 11.92 1.40
1767 24.77 59.35 7.14 5.06
1775 29.98 67.17 0.01
1783 14.73 79.82
c ont 'd •••• Table III _#?argana Cba t su
Percentage Of I'3 venue derived from each c ro}! { Kharif l Year Cotton Indigo Sugar- Til Makka Mandno Jooar Bajra Kodon Mung Moth Urd Chola Guwar cane
1751 17.62 0.11 0.15 1.24 6.48 4.10 3.13 8.88 2.64 3.94 30.57 4.42 3.35 2.12
1752 23.22 1.10 0.55 1.11 11.11 5.17 0.91 10.23 4.66 3.25 16.53 8.35 3.16 0.94
1753 4:2.73 1.88 0.23 22.61 3.96 0.45 7.02 6.08 0.67 3.26 0.79 4.17 0.24:
175:' 5.76 1.62 0.27 1.19 10.44 0.82 7.35 31.92 3.54 0.96 28.69 0.87 1.89 2.22
1758 24.01 0.96 0.07 o.so 13.94 1.53 1.77 15.65 1.30 1.74 28.83 1.94 3.62 0.37
1760 11.00 2.74 1.88 1.54 5.58 2.50 3.92 28.44. 1.48 3.43 14.66 7.69 5.62 0.83
1761 21.51 0.51 3.23 0.85 14.72 3.58 1.31 27.72 2.94 3 0 43 16.87 10.29 5e22 0.55
i762 28.21 3.66 1.42 10.86 3.52 1.64 19.08 2.28 1.43 16.13 4.53 4 .5~: 0 .5~:
1763 22.38 0.47 3.41 1.35 9.02 3.49 2.41 23.55 0.74 0:.0 19.38 5.681.13
1764 19.65 0.44 3.52 1.17 0.95 1.21 9.67 22.08 o.a8 26.93 3.03 1.28
1766 17.00 0.42 1.16 2.39 1.61 5.89 26.19 1.51 0.78 23.75 1.57 2.85 0.91
1767 16.26 0.49 3.43 3.69 4.78 0.92 11.83 21.22 1.54 20.60 2.18 1.95 0.69
1768 7.17 0.33 5.85 6.20 9.87 0.70 14.06 23.13 0.58 1.48 22.56 2.77 2.33 0.72
1769 34.45 0.41 1.94.: 4.83 3.53 0.59 11.71 24.71 1.25 0.49 9.761.83 1.02 0.93
1771 10.27 0.09 2.91 1.37 7.40 .0.32 8.12 29.33 1.34 0.85 8.12 4.84 1.18 1.49 1774 24.45 0.20 3.29 0.16 7.82 1.50 12.68 20.71 2.79 0.97 12.68 0.53 1.42 0.72 1779 21.65 0.83 0.94 24.69 1.42 0.21 11.97 1.48 2.28 21.88 1.99 1.85 1.11 1782 13.00 5.74 1.91 5.18 ~.13 2.39 3.31 9.43 1.57 1.64 16.81 ~,2S 2.85 0.76 1788 12.04 0.79 1.09 2.38 20.06 o.ao 12.00 25.45 0.19 1.31 12.84 4.21 1.84 ~99
"" (\j
133
Cont 'd ••••• Pargana Chatsu
l?eroentye of revenue derived from each crop (Rabi)
Year Barley \7heat Gram Cbomli Go,jro Ve,jbri
1751 3952 5.84: 7.64 25.73 3.98 13.51 •
1752 55.55 13.33 13.34 13.39 1.60 4.51
1753 34.77 3.94 22.73 29.93 4.32 4.32
1756 73.66 a .as 0.09 19.12 1.27
1757 72.70 5.09 17.90 11.98 1.68 2.72
1758 82.29 2.98 0.49 11.32 1.86 0.23
1760 53.59 7.76 17.11 7.4t' 1.96 10.85
1761 69.08 8.37 2.66 13.81 2.73 0.28
1762 53.31 9.57 8.87 21.29 4.29 1.42
1763 72.68 9.33 3.41 9.85 2.34 0.25
1764 66.85 13.92 5.29 9.33 2.03 1.16
1766 51.69 13.30 15.40 10.21 1.78 4.86
1767 38.14 16.02 22.76 12.80 1.10 6.12
1768 52.72 17.46 5.30 17.58 1.79 2.28
1769 32.25 11.09 23.36 22.58 0.93 4.42
1771 43.65 9.28 22.17 16.63 0.57 5.49
1773 39.17 5.62 4.15 43.94 1.07 1.51
1774 36.05 3.04 19.05 29.75 0.43 4.11
1782 41.82 19.72 11.38 22.84 0.91 0.80
1788 55.52 35.83 4.85 0.09 1.12
c ont 1 d •••• Tablo III Pargana Dausa
Percentage of Revenue derived from each crop (Kharif)
Year Sugar-cane Cotton Indigo Tobacco Makka Bajra Jowar Varti Sali l!Iung Moth Chola Urd
1759 11.39 0.61 0.11 5.65 30.58 13.92 2.08 0.54 2.7-t 20.39 6.44 1.03
1.760 3.42 9.10 1.09 0.13 7.99 14.95 4.18 18.29 1.21 6.15 19.17 12.06
1765 11.63 17.36 0.13 0.84 8.39 26.16 ~ .39 0.28 0.72 1.30 12.69 1. 78 0.11
1768 6.85 9.31 0.53 1.02 13.32 12.00 15.66 0.19 0.43 1.90 19.36 2.30 10.46
1769 2.35 37.86 0.75 1.17 3.53 14.11 22.29 o.os 0.67 0.50 10.77 1.22
iT'(O 1.31 1.74 5.53 21.52 33.82 0.16 2.00 1.60 23.71 2.0~ 2.15
1771 1.98 2.16 3.47 0.57 1-!.58 ~3.06 22.28 1.27 3.26 1.12 .,. 1.77 1.20
1~/72 3.30 10.14: 1.30 5.46 5.14 33.66 2.76 2.28 3.85 1.69 18.71 o.so 1.34,
1775 21.81 1.13 14.46 23.31 11.21 0.23 1.14. 13.88 2.56 2.79
1776 2.41 17.87 0.35 6.49 21.93 9.72 0.45 2.08 1.11 23.29 3.50 4.69
1780 6.07 1.06 0.14 15.18 40.29 5.16 4.58 3.73 0.25 19.38 1.01 0.32
1786 6.65 1.87 41.62 5.96 0.42 24.87 15.76 0.75
1789 1.66 6.09 o.aa 52.39 12.69 0.39 10.98 4.26 6.43
135
Cont'd ••••• Pargana Dausa
Percentage of Revenue derived from each crop (Rabi)
Year Barley t'heat Gram Seko Vejhri Gojro
1759 76.15 17.29 3.74 0.88 0.28
1760 45.76 25;l 5 12.35 0.35 6.61
1762 57.45 30.74 2.71 5.25 6.47
1764: 36.60 18.86 6.24 26.29 0.77 2.04
1765 24.56 10.38 3.05 55.37 2.54 1.18
1769 15.61 13.23 10.62 19.16 3.27
1770 20.58 25.13 6.43 40.06 7.46
1772 22.44 19.38 10.53 34.15 3.25 0.26
1774 49.31 28.47 16.41 12.16
1775 18.79 10.63 5.10 48.08
1776 33.82 28.26 8.81 25.55 0.69
1789 53.69 31.25 3.52
C ont 1 cl ••• Tabl~ III Pargana Lalsot
Percentage of revenue derived from each crop (Kharif)
Year Sugar-cane Cotton Hemp Ajt'lain !¥Iakka Mandwo Bajra Moth Chola Guwar Urd :.lung
1751 12.28 25.81 6.16 2.46 1.63 2.62 13.04 21.53 3.74 2.71 0.43 0.43
1752 18.75 32.79 2.31 0.51 1.83 1.05 16.08 12.30 2.97 2.28 1.86 0.67
1753 1:1.02 36.51 2.47 o.1o 4.79 1.14 17.13 15 .o1 3.80 2.34 0.59 0.17
1754 16.46 23.11 3.87 0.20 5.98 0.51 22.37 16.63 4.34 2.62 0.21 0.22
1755 12.22 12.99 0.18 8.66 0.21 48.97 9.44 1.36 1.31 0.04 0.09
1756 20.00 0.23 0.14 6.77 0.97 22.75 25.44 6.53 2.34 0.33 0.39
1757 8.15 12.62 o.o2 0.87 6.42 2.74 37.54 15.48 2.28 2.22 0.18 o.o8
1758 10.80 27.49 0.42 0.71 3.16 0.86 22.68 19.82 3.86 1.78 0.81 0.48
1759 14.44 20.20 2.12 3.88 0.33 30.80 12.74 6.01 3.21 0.6~ 0.07
1761 19.63 29.33 0.40 0.93 1.15 0.75 22.25 8.38 6.75 3.33 0.78 0.39
1762 15.83 38.35 1.11 3.49 0.70 15.64 11.08 6.08 2.98 0.17 0.33
1763 13.77 25.59 0.46 1.73 1.23 0.52 20.45 20.89 7.79 3.54 0.36 o.os t•/64: 14.06 29.71 1.25 2.17 2.02 1.13 9.11 24.16 7.00 3.69 0.14 0.13 :1.765 18.62 29.18 o.1o 3.69 2.97 0.59 7.87 10.68 4.79 3.76 0.24 0.05 i 76 .. , 21 .53 27.38 0.01 4.85 0.98 0.40 17.00 14.01 3.47 3.62 0.93 0.11 1768 19.94 18.18 0.16 1.15 0.70 0.06 37.14 11.70 1.52 4.09 0.40 0.18 1769 24.17 49.00 0.74 2.53 2.18 o.o7 24.17 8.55 2.11 4.36 0.54 o.os 1770 9.12 23.09 0.77 3.47 5.55 0.63 38.97 6.25 2.36 2.46 0.67 1777 14.26 42.57 1.97 1.52 0.36 21.84 3.15 1.39 1.67 0.16 17"(9 9.32 35.50 2.00 2.83 1.58
I-" 16.00 15.62 3.19 3.06 0.63 0.48 C...J
1787 26.22 7.50 4.45 1.49 3.09 14.88 3.13 1.73 en
0.14
137
Cont 'd •••• Pargana lalsot
.Percentage of revenue derl~d from each crop {Rabi)
Year Barler lTheat Gram
1751 56.60 25.75 3.05
1752 59.93 22.94 5.41
1753 53.87 32.62 5.20
1754: 60.29 24.51 12.91
1755 78.9,G 20.05 0.19
1756 83.19 16.03 0005
1757 79.57 13.56 6.15
1758 78.95 19.15 0.68
1759 76.85 17.96 4.11
1761 63.16 26.50 1.72
1762 56.35 29.25 13.49
1763 68.05 15.63 3.99
1764: 67.08 27.44 4.43
1765 68.77 30.08 0.27
1767 39.78 39.76 19.25
1768 41.89 49.30 7.54
1769 37.05 42.86 14.52
1770 56.53 36.19 5.65
1777 51.39 23.72 23.40
17'67 28.15 66.73 2.19
Cont 'd ••• Table III Pamana Malarna
Percentage of revenue derived ttrom each crop (Kharif)
Year Sugar- Cotton Til Tobacco Bajra Jowar Moth Urd Mung Makka Sali Chole cane
1751 5 .os 1.38 14.64 1.08 25.83 23.44 21.98 2.48 2.oo 0.16 0.41 0.4.3
1754, 9.58 4.60 6.14 0.98 25.64 34.54. 8.79 1.34 1.13 0.84 1.05 0.32
1756 0.,30 1.68 4.45 0.31 41.59 43.02 8.39 0.33 0.28 o.81 0 .14, 0.12
175"1 1.09 1.02 9.05 20.,.67 51.06 6.61 1.46 2.53 0.42 0.25 1.36
1758 3.58 8.84 3.94 0.49 39.80 21.35 13.96 1.04 1.74 0.26 1.51
1759 7.22 6.63 6.38 0.46 36.11 23.67 12.35 1.70 0.11 1.32 0.13 2.2:.t
1760 8.74 2.32 8.72 0.80 38.53 3.31 11.42 15.90 0.98 1.42 0.81 4.15
1761 3.12 7.42 3.07 0.47 35.54 22.13 2.95 3.92 0.26 1.53 1.53 1.55
1,_(62 7.25 7.20 8.62 0.69 32.46 32.67 5.54 2.50 0.25 2.47 1.56 0.88
:: 'f63 3.71 5.86 9.85 1.17 34:.68 22.40 14..64: 1 /(4: 1.18 1 .. 08 0.54: 1.3:1
1 ~{65 3.91 1.29 6.15 0.46 48.85 30.45 5.62 o.s3 0.50 0.41 0.10 o.:t9 1766 4.77 5.04 8.59 1.18 37.42 25.87 11.65 0.98 0.67 0.15 0.16 0.18
176"1 9.30 3.35 20.15 1.05 36.51 9.53 11.16 2.10 0.58 0.15 0.53 0.37 1768 5.98 0.3u 18.66 0.48 33.77 26.03 6.78 1.36 1.47 0.18 0.23
1769 12.51 8.60 16.36 1.23 43.64 3.39 2.71 1.79 0.20 0.59 1.86 0.08 1775 6 .J81 2.36 7.77 1.17 59.87 14.01 2.60 1.46 1.56 0.16 0.14, o.os 1775 5.37 1.60 12.57 1.05 42 .58 21.99 9.75 1.79 0.87 0.09 0.22 0 .0"{ 1777 13.82 1.62 7.52 0.93 43.72 14.08 10.09 4.21 1.47 0.96 0.90 0.22 1.778 9.77 1.27 5.44 0.5:!. 50.21 16.99 4.99 3.20 0.85. 3.02 0.43 0.89 1--'-\
1781 1.81 1.43 10.55 c...:> 0.62 27.26 26.08 5.53 2.60 6.97 1.63 1.61 0.26 00 1782 4.29 2.24 9.04 1.19 1f}.82 53,51 . ~440 a.:to 0;..,35 1'.49 1.78 1.08
1 'f84, 8.13 1.06 2.15 1.01 61.92 18.36 2.49 1.19
139 Cont 'd ••••• Pargana ;Jalarna;
Percentage of revenue derived from each crop (Rabt.}
Year Barley t7heat Gram ·~ihri Goohni Gojro A lsi Sarson
1751 55.30 28.30 7.25 5.17 0.1'7 - 0.04 . 1754: 24.'74 22.50 21.85 13.75 0.08 0.07 0.16 0.12
1756 66.70 28.14 1.73 2.23 ... 0.22 o.o2 0.23
1757 4:1.50 43.81 9.75 2.56 1.62 0.14 0.13
1758 77.13 12.9'5 1.15 1.09 0.89 0.47 0.14
1759 40.03 23.06 28.39 2.98 o.so 0.81 2.17
1760 16.51 32.26 30.93 17.56 o.o6 0.52 0.75 0.70
1761 55.46 24.01 16.86 2.03 1.16 1.99 0.04 0.09
1762 50.87 20.63 64.84 5.05 2.18 2.02 - 0.12
1763 79.87 6.87 4.30 1.97 0.03 2.70 0.27
1765 48.29 24.03 17.24 1.24 1.97 1.79 0.15 0.44:
1767 9.56 30.56 31.34 13.77 12.64 0.41 0.31 0.28
1768 29.74 47.03 9.93 5.08 2.19 2.1S 0.13 0.24
1769 16.99 62.19 17.23 0.86 0.78 0.23 0.55 0.19
1774 35.30 30.75 26.19 2.11 3.29 0.07 0.04
1775 70.38 15.83 1.80 0.16 ... 0.09 0.04
1776 39.50 31.71 18.13 2.89 5.84 0 .. 23 0.17
1777 44.67 32.42 11.23 3.24
1778 44.98 24.05 22.18 3.89 2.4:8
Con·t 'd ••••• Table III l'amana Swai Jaipur
Percentage of revenue derived from each crop (Rh_arif)
Year Cotton Sugar- Makka Mandwo Bajra Jouar Varti Chola Moth Mung Guuar Urd cane
1~156 10.09 3.29 23.83 6.68 22.78 2.20 2.77 9.44 10.47 1.50 2.38 0.11
1757 7.31 1.78 15.59 7.44 24.88 7.42 2.82 4.61 27.83 0.88 1.75 0.10
1759 14.75 2.26 15.19 2.53 18.23 1.98 1.53 8.40 22.80 2.50 3.07 0.53
1760 8.81 3.04. 13.27 6.38 21.22 1.83 1.86 12.12 18.21 4.69 0.96 4.46
1761 15.41 3.84 27.10 8.53 8.79 0.61 1.56 9.31 14.18 3.81 0.93 1.24
1762 25.20 3.41 22.82 10.88 8.02 1.05 1.97 7.00 12.52 1.89 0.54 1.48
:t 763 12.87 3.56 27.31 9.57 7.72 1.75 9.52 20.60 1.19 1.16 0.74
:i.76~ 15.55 5.43 14.08 3.15 10.60 4.50 0.03 .. , .89 29.19 0.65 1.38 0.82
1765 15.06 4.61 4.61 7.36 16.11 3.44 1.21 3.93 11.55 0.77 1.57 0.22
1766 17.83 5.90 5.90 3.62 16.09 3.50 1.09 5.63 27.16 1.34 1.32 0.90
1767 11.23 9.41 20.92 2.26 26.97 2.96 0.77 6.33 24.73 1.36 3.04 3.59
1769 34.06 7.43 14.53 17.99 3.86 4.03 10.24 0.59 0.82 0.51
1770 19.67 6.67 14.16 2.07 23.90 6.13 0.~2 5.42 14.64 1.20 2.08 0.83
141
Cont 'd •••• ~ana Suai Ja:T.pur
Percentage of revenue derl ved from each crop (Rabi)
Year Barley T'lheat Gram Gojro Vejhri Gochni
1756 71.96 18.17 0.63 7.85 o.os 0.01
1757 75.22 15.12 2.87 4. 70 0 0 76 0.04
1759 63.09 14.53 1.81 3.23 0.17 0.02
1760 64.27 20.00 7.47 3.43 2.21 0.45
1761 65.84 22.32 2.07 6.90 0.57 0.25
1762 58.67 26.26 3.91 6.43 2.03 0.71
1763 72.09 19.31 1.56 3.71 0.80 0.59
1764 68.90 19.90 3.91 3.56 1.05 0.51
1765 68.42 23.35 4 0 16 0.91 0.49
1766 55.83 26.98 8.33 2.50 1.94 1.89
1769 51.72 18.09 13.96 1.65 7.42 1.32
1770 53.94 23.1.8 16.02 1.40 1.41 1.25
Cont rd •••• Table III T-ercentr:~ge of Revenue derived from each
crop in sample villages
PARGANA CHATSU
Kharif
Year Cotton Makka Vegi- Chola Kodon Bajra Moth Mung Jowar Gauar Sali Sugar ....
tables Urd cane
1752 28.39 8.83 9.86 2.16 2.99 7.46 18.84: 13.56 0.20 1.43 1 0 69 2.02
1755 28.73 8.94 9.55 2.18 1.83 7.54 19.06 13.73 0.20 1.44 1.71 2.04
1758 32.38 7.92 2.59 1.13 2.05 16.86 23.37 3.13 4.15 0.39
1"161 25.39 3.02 3.90 2.87 1.22 27.60 20.81 6.06 0. 85 0.65 0.29 3.54
1764, 24.44 3.79 4.90 4.15 1.84 16.64 29.30 1.85 1.15 1.53 0.01 5.82
1767 16.16 4.89 4.89 2.06 3.64: 24.60 28.81 5.77 5.30 ·0.92 0.42 3.08
'5. 7~1 0 22.19 3.67 6.59 1.77 1.96 35.56 14.56 5.69 3.69 1.51 0.72 0.84
Rabi -Year Chomli
Vegi- Barley Gram Mixed- lTheat tables crops
1752 72.~2 4.38 12.85 5.61 0.97 1.81
1755 68.80 4.92 21.05 1.05 1.89
1758 48.73 2.76 39.37 2.85 1.03 2.87 1761 55.05 2.73 34.32 2.84 0.77 2.55 1764 49.65 2.25 35.89 2.03 2.17 6.34 1767 51.33 2.95 26.75 6.19 1.77 10.98
1770 52.73 3.15 25.21 10.55 1.12 5.93 ~ J.p. rv
Cont'd ••••• TCble III Percentage of Revenue derived from e aoh
crop in sample villages
PARGAN.IJ. DAt.Sa IO.larif
Year Cotton Makka Indigo Vegi- Chola Kodon Bajra Sali Jowar Moth r.~A1ng
Suga!'-tables cano
1760 3.21 3.~9 1.66 0.26 3.52 0.59 ~2.04 1.4'1 6.94 30.06 4.23 2.44
i763 3.21 3.49 .1.66 0.26 3.52 0.59 42.~: 1.47 6.9<{'~ 30.06 4.23 2.4:4:
1766 4.11 11.80 0.69 2.78 4.22 0.75 22.38 2.52 23.37 25.17 0.42 1.'12
:!,.169 13.04 2.55 4.21 1.23 2.62 0.53 17.51 5.06 13.77 33.15 1.57 2.95
1772 1.69 13.29 4.91 1.62 o.81 28.40 0.20 14.00 29.09 :L,i1 3.88
~.775 10.82 10.20 1.63 2.11 6.70 0.03 20.65 8.02 30.04 7.90 :i. .so
1778 4.63 8.61 1.<::5 2.37 5.88 0.04 19.22 0.10 19.95 28.67 5.:16 2o22
Rabi Year \ibeat Barlel Gram Ve~itables
1760 4.50 91.82 1.35 2.31
1763 4.50 91.82 1.35 2.31 1766 20.17 63.58 5.99 6.83 1769 56.63 35.88 1.88 4.46
1772 39.66 49.21 5.51 3.99 1775 33.64 33.87 3.71 2.35
1778 32.08 32.08 8.78 3.96
Cont 'd •••• To.blo III l)ercantage o:r Revonuo derived from each ~];! in Sant]21G villa!jGS
PARGANA L.l\IBOT
KharH,'
Sugar- Manduo To Yaa:J. .. Cotton Bajra Makka Moth Cbola Gurrar Kodon !:~1-s Aj~ain c :a- !ndigo Pulces Hemp caiW etc e c
1.'154 32.03 18.08 20.53 9.50 8.91 2.17 2.60 1.51 3.21 o.33 o.os 0.14: 0.28 0.59
1757 33.10 10.98 7.69 14.65 16.70 2.32 2.83 1.30 5.08 0.46 0.11 0.27 0.34 o.ta
1.760 28.12 16.22 27.10 2.92 7.78 3.84: 3.50 3.03 3.47 2.33 0.29 0.61 0 • .C.2 o.os
1763 37.02 16 01$ 14.47 2.68 11.24 5.25 3.93 1.59 3.56 2.53 0.04 0.75 0.24 0 0 :i. 0
1766 33.05 20.19 15.30 3.84 5.52 2.90 ~1 .s.e: 1.12 3.83 6.84: o.o8 1.1! 0.80 0.35
1769 24.55 13.4:2 39.97 2.45 4.83 1.51 a.l£8 0.67 3.6~. 3.30 0.15 1.93 0.49 o.so
:te.bi Year Barlo~ \.bat Gram
1754 60.26 30.20 4.40
1757 74.91 18.79 2.37
1760 70.80 24.32 2.22
1'163 68.62 25.79 ~.40
1766 42.93 30.98 18.79
1769 4:5.80 49.33 4.45
C ont 'd ••• Tablo III Percenta~o of Revenue derl ved i'rom each
oro:2 in aam21e villMes
PARGANA Mlif.JU\NA
ID1ar-J.f _..,,,,_.--
Sugar- Til Mung Chola Makka Vegi- Kodon Tobacco Yee.:t .. Cotton Bajra Jor.ar Moth Kagni etc • 06.00 Urd table a
i''f55 13.32 2.53 40.68 21.21 2.21 ~.28 1.23 0.67 0.99 1.65 0.89 :t.as
1758 5.28 3.69 37.26 29.68 8.4:5 5.08 1.89 0.72 0.25 1.81 0 0 65 i.34.
:t~l61 1.0.20 2.61 36.82 28.6'1 5.87 6.4..0 2.93 0.61 0.15 1.87 0.54 :i. o OS
1754 5.29 0.74 44.4:7 31.10 3.32 5.21 0.63 0.04: 0.56 :1 .~.1 0 0 23 :t 0 ,_/1..
i767 8.38 0.61 37.11 23.35 7.86 14.38 1.28 0.05 0.60 1.00 o.11 i .39
1770 10.4:2 3.05 57.60 0.6i 18.95 o.o2 0.39 1.86 0.12 2.11
Rabi Year Barley :beat Gram Mixed-oro~
1755 72{37 5.~5 8.4.3 13.23
1758 70.59 16.87 9.97 1.44
1761 46.22 22.11 13.U 17.64
1764 77.43 11.99 5.33 4.03
1767 22.05 37.99 19.40 16.62
1770 28.'12 60.76 1.31 0.50
1--\
!Po CJ1
PARGANA BAHATRI
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS (KHARIFI
1752 1756
1758 1761
1765 1767
1775
PARGANA BAHATRI
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS (RABI)
1752
71.41"1. Barl•y
1758
1765
1775
64.6 9"1.
B1rlty
1756
1761
1767
1780
PARGANA DAUSA
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS (KHARIF)
39.14 "/, Moth
1759
1765
60.95"!. Moth
1770
39 ss "/, Moth
1776
1760
1769
1772
47.51 "/, Ba1ra
1789
;t
"' ~
PARGANA DAUSA PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS (RABI)
t759 1760
37. 94"/. Barloy
33 40 "I. Soko
1765 1769
18.62"1. Grim
1770 1772
33.44 "!. Whul
t776 1789
PARGANA LALSOT PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS (KHARIF)
1751
~754
3 6 6 4 .,.
Mot~
1752
1758
1763
J ~ lB "1. Molh
1768
PARGANA LALSOT
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS (I<HARIF)
41.74'Moth
t770
t779 t797
PARGANA LALSOT PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS (RABI)
66.56 .,,
/
/ Whe-011
1761 1763
1765 1768
Whul
1751 1752
=~===30.95'4 Gram
Wheat
1754 1758
PARGANA LALSOT
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CAOPS(AASI)
58-92-/ Barlay
t770
35.99~ Wheat
40.64"h Barley
1779
5LS5-r. Barley
GS.GO~ Wheat
29.46~ Grem
t777
1767
PARGANA MALARNA
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS (KHARIF)
55.88 "1. Moth
175t
40.51 '!. Bajra
46.)3°/o Moth
1756
)).40 "1. Bajra
29.31 "1. Moth
1759
1763
31.07% Jow~r
;'
" ~~---L------~ 0
t754
t75B
1765
PARGANA MALARNA
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS ( KHARIFJ
2-76'7.
lf:.s:;;~~~ro cotton
t769 t775
4777 t778
PARGANA MALARNA PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT CROPS (RABI)
22.61"/. Wheat
1751 1754
1756 1758
67.13"1.
Barley
1759 1761
73.55 "1.
·--. ----· 1763 1765
PAf\(;ANA MAbA@NA (j>(!~(!NYAGC! Mt!A CULiiVAiED UNDER DIFFERENT
CrlOPS(AAQI)
Q775
PARGANA SWAI JAIPUR
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS(~HARIF)
18.60"1. Gajra
0 b9 "1. _ ~ .. gar c arH•
Moth
1756
1761
1764
1769
18.10"1. Bo)r•
51.62 "1. Moth
1757
1762
35-89"1. Moth
t770
1-20%
PARGANA SWAI JAIPUR
PERCENTAGE AREA CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT
CROPS IRABII
1756
19.86 '1. Whoa I
1761
1764
1769
1757
t762
zo 61 "!. Wh~al
1765
t770
PERCENTAGE REV_~f\!_l!_s PARGANA BAHATRI
KHARIF (CASH CROPS) ,.------
30
25
20
IS
1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR)
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
r-55
50
45 ,.------
40
-3 5 !"---
1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR)
KHARIF (PULSES)
30
25
20
-t----
15
1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR)
-RABI (FOOD CROPS)
--95
t----1----t---
90
85
1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA BAHATRI
KHARIF (CASH CROPS)
1\ 1\ KHARIF !PULSES) I \ I \
30 I \ 30
I \ ~I I
I I I I
I I 25 \ I \ I I I I / \ I \
\ \ I I I \ \ I
\
20 I I 20 I I v I I v
IS IS
1751 56 61 66 71 76 1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR) (YEAR)
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
55 r---, I I
I I I I I I I
so I . I
I I I I
RABI !FOOD CROPS)
I 45 I
I I I I I I
I I 40 I
I I 90
I I
I \ I I I
35 v 85
1751 56 61 66 71 76 1751 56 61 66 71 76 (YEAR) (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA CHATSU
KHARIF !CASH CROPS) 35
30 ~ r-
!r--
20
r-
10 -
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 (YEAR)
90 RABI (FOOD CROPS)
-
80
f--
70
-f--
60 t--
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 (YEAR)
RABI (CHOMLI) KHARIF (FOOD CROPS) 30 -~----
60 -
r-
50 -
- -40 -
f--
30
t750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 !YEAR)
KHARIF !PULSES)
40
30 r- -
-20
10
I -·- - ~
t750 54 58 62 66 70 74 1'!
IYEARI
25
-
20
- -IS
r--
-10
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 (YEAR)
f-- RABI (MIXED CROPS)
10
9
8
7
6 -f---.--,
5
4 r--
3 r-2
1 ·;~o s4 sa 62 66 70 74 78
IYE4R)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE P~RGANA CHATSU
KHARIF (CASH CROPS
40
30 1 I I 1', I
~ 20 1 I \ I
1 I ' I I I v I I
10 'v'
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 !YEAR!
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
30
175054 58 62 66 70 74 78 I YEAR)
40
30
20
10
KHARIF I PULSES)
r-' \ I \
I \ I \.
' ' \
\
'----
-~~--L-~~~~~
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 "'8 (YEAR I
90
70
60
I I I I
RABI IFOOD CROPS!
f', / "'---,
\ \
\ \ \
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 (YEAR)
30 RABI ICHOMLI)
25
20
\ / \ I v
/
I I I I I
)
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 (YEAR)
I RABI (MIXED CROPS) 10 1 9
8
2 '(
I I I
54 58 62 66 70 74 78 IYEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE QASBA CHATSU
KHARIF
40
35
30
t---25
(CASH CROPS)
1750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
KHARIF 40 (FOOD CROPS)
30
10 ~
.-
1750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
30
20
10
-
KHARIF (PULSES)
1750 54 58 62 66 70 I YEAR)
20
15
10
5
-
KHARIF IVEGITABLES)
175054 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
RABI I FOOD CROPS)
6
5
41---
3
2
1750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
95
90~
85
RABI (CHOMLI)
-
r- -
1750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE QASBA .CHATSU
KHARIF ICASH CROPS)
40
ft, I I I I
35 I I I I I I
30 I
I ''-l
25
t750 54 58 62 66 70 I YEAR)
40
KHARIF
!FOOD CROPS)
/' I \
30 I I I \
~ I \,/
2o I
tO
t750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
40 KHARIF !PULSES)
1750 54 58 62 66 70 I YEAR)
KHARIF 20 IVEGITABLES)
\ \
15 \
\ \ r-,
10 \ ' \ I I I v
5
t750 54 58 62 66 70 I YEAR)
RABI
I FOOD CROPS l
t750 54 58 62 66 70 IYEAR)
tOO
95
85
RABI ICHOMLI)
!750 54 :'l 62 66 70 (Ylr~" i
PARCENTAGE REVENUE PARGAIIIA DAUSA
RABIIFOOD CROPS)
KHARIF r--r 3 0 ICASH CROPS) 90
' .. ,...----
2 0
r--10
1759 64 69 74 (YEAR)
KHARIF 35 I PULSES)
r---
30
25
20
-
85
80 r--
79 84 .. 751759 64
70 KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
60
sol:---
40 r---
~
69 74 (YEAR)
1759 64 69 74 79 E4 (YEAR)
79
RABI (MIXED CROPS)
6
5
4
3
1759 64 69 74 79 84 (YEAR)
1759 64 69 74 79 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA DAUSA
RABI
30 KHARIF
ICASH CROPS)
,,-.----.............
20~ I I
I I I I
10 I I I
1759 64 69 74 79 84 !YEAR)
90
85
80
I FOOD CROPS)
I I I I I
I I \ I \ I II II I
85~~~-7.~~--~--~ 1759 64 69 74 79 84
(YEAR)
KHARIF
IFOOD CROPS)
35
25
20
1759
KHARIF !PULSES)
I I
7
60
so
40
I \
' \ \
1759 64
~ II I I I I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
\ I I
' \ \
\ I
' \ I
" 64 69 74 79 84
(YEAR)
I I I I
I I I I I I I
I
69 74
I I \I .j
(YEAR)
6
5
4
3
1759
79 84
RABI ,!MIXED CROPS) I I I I I I
I I I I I I
,, I ' I ' ' I I '
" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •I ~I
64 68 74 79 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA JAIPUR
KHARIF ICASH CROPS) RABI !FOOD CROPS) 40 95
.--.-- I--
30 ~ 90
-r--f--
20 85
.--I--
~
10 80
1756 59 62 65 68 71 175659 62 65 68 71 !YEAR) !YEAR)
KHARIF !FOOD CROPS) 60_
so
1--~ r--
40 ~
1756 59 62 65 68 71 !YEAR)
KHARIF !PULSES) r--
35_
30
25
20
1756 59 62 65 68 7t !YEAR)
RABI (MIXED CROPS)
8 .--
7F-r--
6 I--
5
4
3
2
1756 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA JAIPUR
KHARIF !CASH CROPS) RABI (FOOD CROPS)
40 95
\ \
30 90 \
20 85
tO 80
1756 59 62 65 68 71 1756 59 62 75 68 71 !YEAR) !YEAR)
KHARIF !PULSES)
17S6 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
60 KHARIF !FOOD CROPS) I \ \ \
40
1756 59 62 65 68 71 !YEAR)
RABI (MIXED CROPS)
8
7 I ', "\ I
6~/ 5 - '.-,.-._____
\ I 4 \
3
2
t756 59 62 65 68 7t !YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE PARGANA LALSOT
KHARIF 60 r- (CASH CROPS)
r---- r----
.---
50 .-----
f---
40 -
r--
30 r- r----
20 t75t 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
30r
f--
20r
(YEAR)
1---
t0~~~~~~~~~~-7~~~---l75t 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
30
25 1-
20 -
t5 1-
tO
KHARIF (P S UL ES)
1---
r----
r--
f----
1---
t75t 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
901-
B 51-
(YEAR)
RABI (FOOD CROPS)
,_.- ,---
1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE ~ REVE:NUE PARGANA LALSOT
KHARIF
60 (CASH CROPS)
50
I I I I
40 I I I I
J " I , /
30 1/
20~~~~~~~~~--~~~----1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
YEAR
I<HARIF
I FOOD CROPS)
40 ,.~,i I I I ' I ' I ' I ' '
I I I
I ' I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
30 I I I
I
I I I I I I I I ' I I I
I \ I I I I I I
\ I
\ I 20 I
I I \ I I I v
tO 1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
YEARS
I<HARIF
30 (PULSES)
1-II I I I I I I
25 I I I I I I I I
\ I \ \ I
' I I
\j I 20
IS
10~~~~~~--~~~~~~~---1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
YEAR
RABI !FOOD CROPS)
tOO
r---·\ I \
I \ \ I
I \ I ' I I \.. __ _) I
I I
I I I I I I I I
90 I I I I
85
T I I I I I I I 1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72
YEARS
PERCENTAGE REVENUE QASBA LALSOT
KHARIF (CASH CROPS) 1--
60 ,....---- -
-50 1-
I--
40
1--
1--
30
;:;.
1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS I r--
50
.........-
40
r---
30
r---
r--
20 1----
1--
1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
KHARIF (PULSES)
20
-IS
.----r-- r--
10
1---
5
1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
RABI (FOOD CROPS)
100
99 r---
r--98
1---_
97
96
95
94
1--93
92
9 '
1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE REVENUE QASBA LALSOT
I 20 I<HARIF (PULSES)
I KHARIF (CASH CROPS)
I 60 \ A
I ,'\ ;1, I \ tS I \
I J\/1 I \ I \1 I \
\ _..1 \ so
\ I \ I tO
\ I \ I
40 \ I v
5
30
t7St 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR) (YEAR)
I<HARIF (FOOD CROPS) RABI (FOOD CROPS)
50 100
/', / '
/1 r-.../ '\ 98 \
40 I I \ I I 97 I I I I
I I 96
I I I
30 I 95 I I 94
I 93
20 I I
92
9t
t75t 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 1751 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 (YEAR) (YEAR)
70
60
-
50
40
PERCENTAGE REVENUE VILLAGE CHANDSENI
KHARIF (CASH CROPS)
,..-
-
1--
30 KHARIF (PULSES)
25
-
20
t5
PERCENTAGE REVENUE VILLAGE CHAND SENI
70
60
40
KHARIF (CASH CROPS)
I I I I I
\ I \ I
v
~, I I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I
I I
I I I I
1753 56 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
40
30
20
10
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
I I I I I
I I L-..J
1753 56 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
100 RABI (FOOD CROPS)
99 ,--\
/
( \ 98 I
\ \
I 97 I
96 I I
95 ,) /
/
94
93
92
91
1753 56 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
30
25
20
IS
;1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I \ \ \
\
1753 56 59 62 65 68 71 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE _REVEN_UE PARGANA MALARNA
35 KHARIF (CASH CROPS)
tO
t749 55 6t 67 73 79 (YEAR)--
80 KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
70 -
60
i--- -so
t749 55 6t 67 73 79 (YEAR)
20 _ KHARIF (PULSES)
IS f----- -
tO
5
t749 55 61 67 73 79 (YEAR)
100
90
80-
70
60
so
40
RABI (FOOD CROPS)
t749 55 6t 67 73
1.0
0.9
0.8
(YEAR)
RABI (OIL SEEDS)
79
-0.7
0-6
o.s
0.4
0.3
0.2 1----
0.1
1749 55
-
61 67 73 79 (YEAR)
RAB! (MIXED CROPS)
12
II
10 1----
9
8
7
6
5
4
1749 55
,.....---
1----
61 67 73 79 (YEAR)
PERCENTAGE RE'v. '<'JE PARGANA MALARNA
KHARIF (CASH CROPS) RABI (FOOD CROPS) 35 100 __ ....._
30 90 /,... \
/
80 /
70 20
60
50
10 40
1749 55 61 67 73 79 1749 55 61 67 73 79 (YEAR) (YEAR)
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS) RABI (OIL SEEDS) 80 1.0
0.9 f, 1\ I '
I ' 0.8 I \ 70 I \ I I I
I \ 0.7 I
\ I
I \ \ I
0.6 I \ /
I / 0.5 \ /
I \ / I
\1
o.3 I 50 I
0.2 I
0.1
1749 55 61 67 73 79 1749 55 61 67 73 79 (YEAR) (YEAR)
KHARIF (PULSES) 20 RABI (MIXED CROPS)
\ \ 12
'\ 11
15 \..:: -::\ 10
\ 9 \ /
10 \ I \ \ /
/
'v 7
6 5
5
4
1 I I I I I
73 79 1749 55 61 67 73 79 1749 55 61 67
(YEAR)
40
30r--
20
10
PERCENTAGE REVENUE QASBA MALARNA
RABI
KHARIF !CASH CROPS)
100 t FOOD CROPS l ....---
90r=--
80 I-
1--
- 70
t75t 55 59 63 67 7t !YEAR)
t75t 55 59 63 67 7t !YEAR)
KHARIF tO !PULSES)
,....--
9
Br-
7
6
5
4 1--
3
80
70
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS l ....---
....---
1---
1---
t75t 55 59 63 67 7t (YEAR)
40
30
20 ..-
RABI (MIXED CROPS)
r--
1--- tOt--2
175t 55 59 63 !YEAR)
67 7t 1---
t75t 55 59 63 67 71 !YEAR I
PE~CENTAGE REVENUE QASBA MALARNA
40 KHARIF 100 I FOOD CROPS)
!CASH CROPS) I~ I I
~ I I I I\
30 I I ' I \
I \
I \
1\ / I
80 I I \ I I I ...;
\ I I I I I I I
10 v 70 ~
1751 55 59 63 67 71 1751 55 59 63 67 71 !YEAR) !YEAR)
KHARIF (FOOD CROPS)
~ 80 I \
I \ " I \ I \ I \ I \
70 ~ I V \ I \
60 I \
T I I I I I 1751 55 59 63 67 71
I YEAR)
KHARIF RABI
10 (PULSES) 40 I MIXED CROPS)
A ~I 9 'I II 8
I \ I I I I 30 I I
7 I I I I I I I I
6 \ I I I \ I I I I
5 \ I 20
k 4 'J I I
3 I 10 , I I 1
2 \ I I I \ 1 I I 'J v
175 55 59 63 67 71 1751 55 59 63 67 71 I YEAR) !YEAR)
PROPORTION OF REVENUE DERIVED IN KHARIF PARGANA
JAIPUR
40
30
20
I I I I
1756 59 62 65 68 71 I YEAR)
t751 55 59 63 67 71 75 I YEAR)
CHATSU so
1750 54 58 62 66 70 74 I YEAR)
MALARNA
70
60
so
1751 55 59 63 67 71 I YEAR)
1750 54 58 62 66 70 (YEAR)
DAUSA
50 ,...,
I ' ..... I
~ 40 ' I \ I
30
\ I
' I '-J
1758 62 66 70 74 78 82 I YEAR)
PROPORTION OF REVENUE DERIVED IN RABI PARGANA JAIPUR
80
so 1756 68 7a
PAIIAGANA CHAH\1
90r II[V["U[ 1" KINO FIIOM IIHAIIIF I IIAIII
eo
~ 70 " I \
I \
I \
I \ I
60 I I I I I
I I I I \_ _ _.! I
so I I --· KHAAIF I - AADI I I
.oiO I I I I
30 I 1150 ... 58 u •• 10 1.ol
'I' CAll
eaeGeNA GMATtu
10 ACVCNUC IN CAIH '110M IIHAAI' ll AADI
60
50
30
ao
I I I I I I I I I I I I
---IIHAIIII' --AACI
\ r--.. I I \ I I ' I I \ I I \ I I \ I I \ I I ' II ' v
10~~~~~--~---L •1so s• so 62 6& 10 1•
Y[AII
90
80
70
60
so
.oiO !1St
so
•o
JO
20
---KHARIF --RABI
1\ I \
I \ I
I \ \
I \ ~
I ~ .....
I I
ss 59 63 67 71 YEAR
PAAGANA B!HATRI
REVENUE IN CASH FROM KHARIF & RABI
\ \ \
\ /', \ / ,, \ I \ I
\/
-- -IIHAIIIF --IIABI
t7~t ~5 59 63 67 7t
'E A~
100
90
so
PARGANA JAIPUR
REVENUE IN KIND FROM KHARIF & RABI
... .... ........ ' '\
\ ', _,r- __ _ \ ,"
\ , \ , v
---ICHAAif' --AAOI
oll_ __ ~~~--~·~--~~~--~6~~o~--,,~~ 1756 59 62 65
VEAA
PAAGANA JAIPUA
70 REVENUE IN CASH FROM KHAAif' 0 RAOI
60 1', I ' I ' I
,'--___ I
/ "' so ,. ,.
"'
-- -KHAAIF --AABI
.. 0
J I I ~ 4756 59 62 65 60 74
VEAA
PARGANA 01\USI\
REVENUE IN KIND FROM KHI\Rif & RADI 80
70
60
110
40~~~~--~~~~~ t7t\O OJ 06 70 74 70
YIEAA
PAAQANA pAUlA AEVENUE IN CAIH f'AOM KHAAif' t. RAOI
60
so
AO
30
-AADI
20 47SO 62 66 70 7 .. 70
VEAA
JO
10
10
100
90
110
J I
PAQ~""411 h ALI!QT ~V(~ C%:1 CtltiO fRO~ «MAAI7 0 AAOI
---, ... ' ........
........ , '
00 10
PABGA~A hM-IOT ~lYl!CUl lt>l CAl" ":tOtA «"ARIF 0 AAOI
/./ /
/ ___ ../
/
_,/
-- -KHARIF --RABI
•o-~~-L--~----L----L--~-------•7So !>A 5oe t~.< 66 70 'I'EAR
f'~~"'l...t!B.I'I! t ._Ul ~ tcd!IO fAO., ILMAQit ' At.OI ..
00~
"' ,/ I f\1 I I 1 I I I
I I ' \ I \
\ I I \ I
"'
59 6J 61 11 Y(AA
PAAGANA MALAANA
1, ·t ~<EVlNU( IN CAlM I"AOM U4AAII" 0 AAOI
---l(foiAA., --AAOI
~\ I \ I
I \ I
I ' / I \ 1
' I \ I 'v v
.... z ~
0 ::; .. -' .. ..... 0 ..... otOO .....
"' Q. 0 80 .. u ... 0 60
"' " ~ 40 z. "' u
201 C1
"' Q.
..... z ~ 0 ::; -<
~·oot ... eo "' Q. 0 a 60 u ... 0 ... •o " c ~
z. 20 ... v (I ... Q.
CHANGES IN THE CROP PATTERN
PARGANA_~ P~R!I,ANA !;H~TSU KHARIF .... KHARIF z
1400 ~
0
.......... Total amount ~ ..
......... Cotton t300 ........ Toto 1 aaount "'· ...
o--o Cotton - Makka "' .. "' ..... ._..,.aHa ....... ea,ro
1200 ~ 0 ... ...._. BaJra .. 0 ........, Moth
! ... --- Mu119 UrG 1100 .... :40 ~
0 0
1ooo3 .. u 30 ... ... .. ... 0
900 0 ... 20 ... " .. ...
1100 z 10 ... u ..
700 ... I 6) 66 0.
17S2 55 511 61 6. 67 YEARS YEARS
PARGANA OAUSA RABI
PI!BGANA C H~T $U .... ~ Total amount z A ADI
Wheat :;, .,......, ~ -Total-nl ......... Barley
••oo .__,_
Gram "' .. .._.a..,.,., ... ... ._.. Vcqctabln ... c ~ Gf"a•
0. ... ~ 0
1300 .. .... ! 0 ... ... ... z 0. :> 0
12000 • ~ u .. ... ... 0 c ... ...
1100 0 " .... c ... z
-:: :;:;._jtOOO
... u
"' ... t7S:' 55 58 61 6• 0' •760 63 69 72 75 78 a
YEARS YEARS
70
1:::: ~ ,2000 ~
I 'Z ~1900 6
::; .. -11800 J .. ....
0 -tPOO 1--
"' -'•5·:)0 w
-~•ooo
... 0. ) a:
z. ....
• 35 00 z :J ;) ::;
-< JOOO" J ..
~25000
...12000
... c b so .... 0 ...... o "' a. 0 a: 30 u
0 20
"' " c ~ tO
"' u a:
"' a.
~ z ::> 0 :1 c ... c
10
0 70 .... 0 60 ....
"' 50 a. 0 ct •o u ... 0 30 ... 'i 20 .. ! tO u ct .. ..
t?SS
PAAGANA 11.4ALAANA KHAAIF
...... Total amount o---4 Suqorcanc .....,. Cotton ....... BOJfO ........ Jowor --- T1l
....,. Total aw.oun\
......., Wheal
CHANGES IN THE C AOP PATTERN
HOO
3200"' ... ... .. 3000~
i 210oz
:> 0
2600!
... c
2•oo 0 ... 2200
2000
s•oo
!5000
•600 ... ... ~00:
::> a
l$00!
l•oo~
lOOO~ c
2600~ ... 0
2200 ...
1000
••oo
.... ~
; ... r .. ~ i a u ... 0
"' ~ •o ... z "' It 10 .. G.
... ~
¥ ;I
~. 0 ... .. G. 0 a u ... 0 .. 0 c ... z .. u a ... ..
PAAGANA bALSOT KHAAIF
~ Total o..aunt ..... Sugarcane ..,.. Cotton -IIGJ"G ......,. Mall:ll:a
1763 1766 YEAIIS
f!B~e!t! I.!I.~QT IIADI
-"'""'·---· .... ..... , -G•-
1'7!>4 t7S7
t769
3900
"' .. .. a. ::>
3500 a: ~ .... z ::> 0 :I c ...
3000~ 0 >-
2 .. 00
seoo
5600
5200
... .. eoo a. :;)
<Z
z .... oo->-;;: ::>
.. 000~ c ...
3600 c .. 0 ...
3100
PAAGANA OAUSA PARGANA WALAANA
... 29 :o ... ... ... .. Q.
~0 ~ 27 #0 ·o 0
.!!: 25 .. g 7
... ! ~ 23 .... 0 z \ l ,.A\ ~ \ c ...J 2t I "" \ ~ s \ "' \ I c \,....--....... \ ... _,
I e t9 ~4 "' \ .._ ___ .... \ I 0 ',J ...
t7 l 1760 63 66 69 72 7S 70 1755 50 61 6<1 67 70
YEARS YEARS
"' PAAGANA CHe.TSU PARGANA LALSOT ... ~ 8 ::l 011 a: Ill ·o Ill
0 ~·o ' ~0 7 \ a: ' ' ' ·o ... , ! \ I 0 9 ' ... \ I .o ' z ' ~ ' 6 6 \ I 'v ~ \ I ... 0 l ,.-----...11' ~ c \ 0 ...J
l 7 c 0 5 \
, c / ...J ... \..... __ _... / c ... 6
0 ... • 5 1752 1755 sa 61 6<1 67 70 1754 57 60 63 66 69
YEARS YEARS
