40
1 Intrinsic Noise Sources in Chopper Intrinsic Noise Sources in Chopper Amplifiers Amplifiers John Caldwell Applications Engineer, Texas Instruments Precision Analog

Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

1

Intrinsic Noise Sources in Chopper Intrinsic Noise Sources in Chopper

AmplifiersAmplifiersJohn Caldwell

Applications Engineer, Texas Instruments Precision Analog

Page 2: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

2

AgendaAgenda• Chopper Amplifier Topology

– Advantages over standard designs

• Chopper Intrinsic Noise Sources– Input Current Noise

• Input Current Noise Calculation

• Transient Noise

– Input Voltage Noise• Effects of chopping on total integrated noise

• Chopping in-band vs out-of-band

• Gain effects

• Application Considerations

Page 3: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

3

Chopper Stabilized TopologyChopper Stabilized Topology

Page 4: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

4

Engineering CompromisesEngineering Compromises

Advantages

• Low Vos

• Low Vos Drift

• Good CMRR

• Good PSRR

• Good long term drift

• Better Insensitivity to stress, moisture

• No 1/f noise

• Better EMI Immunity

Drawbacks

• Chopper / Auto-Zero feed-through

• Higher Ib

• Transient IB noise

Page 5: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

5

Offset Drift ComparisonOffset Drift Comparison

• Offset drift comparison between the OPA2188 and the OP2177– OP2177 (blue trace) .2uV/ºC typical– OPA2188 (red trace) .03uV/ºC typical

• Chopping allows the OPA2188 to reduce offset drift over temperature by almost 7x

Offset Voltage Drift Over Temperature

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

-55 -35 -15 5 25 45 65 85 105 125

Temperature (Deg C)

Off

se

t V

olt

ag

e (

uV

)

OP2177 Offset OPA2188 Offset

Page 6: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

6

Low Frequency Noise ComparisonLow Frequency Noise Comparison

• Low-frequency noise comparison between the OPA2188 and the OP2177– OP2177 (blue trace) 8nV/rtHz @1kHz 54nV/rtHz @1Hz– OPA2188 (red trace) ~8.8nV/rtHz @ 1kHz 11nV/rtHz @1Hz

• Below 100Hz the OPA2188 shows a clear advantage for low-noise precision systems

Voltage Noise Spectral Density

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 10 100 1000

Frequency (Hz)

Vo

ltag

e N

ois

e (

nV

/rtH

z)

OP2177 OPA2188

Page 7: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

7

Common Mode Rejection RatioCommon Mode Rejection Ratio

• Common-mode rejection ratio comparison between the OPA2188 and the OP2177

– OP2177 (blue trace) 125dB typical– OPA2188 (red trace) 134dB typical

Common Mode Rejection Ratio

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000

Frequency (Hz)

CM

RR

(d

B)

OPA2188 OP2177

Page 8: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

8

EMI Rejection RatioEMI Rejection Ratio• Rectification of EMI in the

input differential pair

produces additional DC offset

• Screenshots below show

the change in offset (blue trace) due to input EMI (yellow trace)

– OP2177 on left

– OPA2188 on right

EMI Rejection Ratio (Gain:1)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.00E+10

Frequency (Hz)

EM

IRR

(d

B)

OP2177 OPA2188

OP2177 OPA2188

Page 9: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

9

What This Means to Our CustomersWhat This Means to Our Customers

• Better Initial Accuracy

– Improved initial offset

• Better performance in harsh environments

– Improved rejection of

ground/CM noise

– Improved rejection of EMI

• Fewer recalibrations

– Greatly reduced drift over

time and temperature

Page 10: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

10

Chopper Op Amp Intrinsic Noise SourcesChopper Op Amp Intrinsic Noise Sources

Standard Op Amp Noise Sources

Additional Noise Sources in Chopper Amplifiers

Noise sources in standard op amps – Input Current Noise (IN1, IN2)

– Input Voltage Noise (VN)

Chopper amplifiers have additional noise sources that should be considered in system design

– Input bias current transients (IB1, IB2)

– Chopper clock feed-through

• VC1 (input referred when chopping in-bandwidth)

• VC2 (chopping above bandwidth)

Page 11: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

11

Input Current NoiseInput Current Noise

• Current noise on the inputs can be broken into two separate sources

– Standard input current noise (IN1, IN2)

• Gaussian distribution

• Present in all opamps

– Transient bias current noise (IB1, IB2)

• Periodic/repetitive

• Present in devices with input commutation

Page 12: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

12

• Broadband current noise in FET Input Op Amps can be

calculated from the input bias current:

in: Current Noise Spectral Density

Q: Charge of an electron (1.6x10-

19 Coulombs)

iB: Input Bias Current

FETFET--Input Op Amp Current NoiseInput Op Amp Current Noise

Bn iqi **2=

HzfAin /26.1105*106.1*2 1219=××=

−−

Page 13: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

13

Chopper Input Bias Current is NOT a constant!Chopper Input Bias Current is NOT a constant!

Ib Spec = 160pA (typ)

Chopper input bias current is actually a periodic waveform consisting of:

– An offset current (actual IB of input circuitry)

– A periodic current waveform from switching

The IB spec in the datasheet is determined by averaging the combination

of these two values over a long period of time

Page 14: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

14

Chopper Current Noise in the Frequency DomainChopper Current Noise in the Frequency Domain

The current noise spectral density spec is only valid, yet pessimistic, below the chopping frequency

Example Chopper Current Noise Spectrum

1.00E-15

1.00E-14

1.00E-13

1.00E-12

1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

Cu

rre

nt

No

ise

Sp

ec

tra

l D

en

sit

y (

A/r

tHz)

Bn iqi **2=

Page 15: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

15

What causes the What causes the IbIb spike?spike?Charge Injection

• When the transistor turns off, the

channel charge is dispersed into the

source and drain

• Qch = Cox (Vgs – Vt)

dVQch = Qch / 2Cs

Clock Feedthrough

• When the transistor turns off, the

source voltage is also affected due to

the coupling from gate-source

capacitance

SGS

GSGCol

C C

C * V V

+∆=∆

Page 16: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

16

Observing Bias Current SpikesObserving Bias Current Spikes

• A wideband transimpedance amplifier (TIA) provides a qualitative examination of the severity of spikes in the IB

– The chopper is configured as a buffer

– Non-inverting input is connected directly to the TIA input

• Testing was performed with an OPA657 configured for a gain of 20,000

– Final gain is 10,000 after impedance matching

– Output viewed on a 500MHz oscilloscope (50 ohm input)

Page 17: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

17

Observing Bias Current SpikesObserving Bias Current Spikes

( )2

)2()1()2()1( SpikeUNUNUBUBF

OUT

IIIIIRV

++++−=

7 fA/rtHz1.3 fA/rtHzCurrent Noise

160 pA2 pABias Current

OPA2188OPA657• Static IB should appear as a DC offset

• Averaging on the oscilloscope can be used to remove Gaussian current

noise

• Any repetitive signal in the bias

current should dominate the averaged output waveform

MHzf dB 603 =−

( )Spike

SpikeF

OUT IIR

V ∗=−

≈ 000,102

Page 18: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

18

Investigation ResultsInvestigation Results• Chopper amplifiers from TI and

two competitors were examined– OPA2188– AD8639

– MAX44251

• All parts exhibited similar behavior at the inputs

• Very good correlation between IC-level simulation and observed behavior

– Improvement in future designsOPA2188

AD8639MAX44251

Page 19: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

19

Comparison to Competitor Chopper AmplifiersComparison to Competitor Chopper Amplifiers

• Overlaying the input bias spike waveform in the time domain allows for a direct comparison– The OPA2188 has the least severe input bias spike of the parts examined– The MAX44251 displayed the worst performance

Time Domain View of Input Bias Spikes of Chopper Amplifers

-10000

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Time (nS)

Cu

rre

nt

(nA

)

OPA2188 MAX44251 AD8639

Page 20: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

20

Effects on System PerformanceEffects on System Performance

• Input current spikes are

outside the opamp bandwidth

• Spikes on the Non-Inverting

Input:

– Not amplified

– May affect high-impedance

sensors (sensor becomes transducer)

• Spikes on the Inverting Input:

– Not amplified

– The opamp can be removed

to simplify analysis of the noise contribution

– Current noise is coupled to

the load through the feedback network

Page 21: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

21

Contribution to Output NoiseContribution to Output Noise

Output noise is dependant upon:– Input current spike magnitude

– Feedback network impedance (RF and RG)

– Load Impedance (RLOAD)

Current spikes on the inverting input are coupled to the load by the feedback network

)||(21 LOADFGB RRRIV +=

LOADF

LOADN

RR

RVV

+= 1

1V

Page 22: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

22

Feedback Network ImpedanceFeedback Network Impedance

• Two OPA2188’s were configured for a gain of 11– Blue trace feedback values of 100kOhms and 10kOhms– Red trace feedback values of 1kOhms and 100 Ohms

• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances• Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution of transient current noise

Feedback Impedance Effects on Chopper Noise

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

No

ise

Sp

ec

tra

l D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

OPA2188 (100k/10k) OPA2188 (1k/100)

Page 23: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

23

Load Impedance EffectsLoad Impedance Effects

• This plot shows the output noise from the same amplifier circuit (OPA2188) into two different load impedances

– Red trace is the output noise into a 100 Ohm load– Blue trace is the output noise into a very high impedance load (input impedance of OPA211)

• A reduction in the magnitude of the chopper spurs is evident on the low impedance load

Load Impedance Effects on Output Noise

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

No

ise

Sp

ec

tral D

en

sity

(V

/rtH

z)

100 Ohm Load Impedance High Impedance

Page 24: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

24

Input and Output Voltage NoiseInput and Output Voltage Noise

Voltage noise on the inputs can be broken into two or three separate sources

– Standard input voltage noise (VN)• Gaussian distribution• Present in all opamps

– Chopper clock feedthrough• Chopping within amplifier bandwidth Input referred (VC1)• Chopping above amplifier bandwidth Output referred (VC2)

Page 25: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

25

Chopper Voltage NoiseChopper Voltage Noise

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time Domain

Frequency Domain

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

• The chopper topology modulates the input DC offset to an AC waveform

with an average value of zero

• Symmetical charge and discharge of an output cap produces a triangle

wave at the output

– Consists of a fundamental (chopping

frequency) and odd harmonics

Page 26: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

26

Synchronous Notch FilterSynchronous Notch Filter

• Consider a repetitive waveform in

the time domain

– Zero offset

• The integral over one period of this waveform is zero

• The integral will also be zero for

the harmonics of this waveform

– Integer multiples of frequency

will also ingrate to zero over the same period

fTdtft

T

10)2sin( =→=∫ π

This concept allows us to build a

filter with “notches” at integer multiples of frequency

...3,2,10)2*sin( =→=∫ ndtftnT

π

Page 27: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

27

Synchronous Notch FilterSynchronous Notch Filter• The synchronous notch

filter integrates the input waveform (on capacitor C)

for one clock period

– Switch Phase 1 closed

– Switch Phase 2 open

• The integrated value is then passed to the output

– Switch Phase 1 open

– Switch Phase 2 closed

• This produces the transfer

function shown at right

By synchronizing the switches to the chopping

frequency, TI choppers achieve a 500x reduction in

noise

Page 28: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

28

Investigating Chopper Voltage NoiseInvestigating Chopper Voltage Noise

• Output noise was amplified and viewed in the frequency domain

– Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) was an OPA211 with a gain of 11

– Agilent 35670A (.1 to 100kHz)

– HP3588 (100kHz to 150MHz)– Shielded enclosure and cables

• Noise floor is measured first and subtracted from the final results

Page 29: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

29

Synchronous Notch Filter EffectivenessSynchronous Notch Filter Effectiveness

• OPA2188 Broadband Noise Spectral Density: 8.8 nV/rtHz

• MAX44251 Broadband Noise Spectral Density: 5.9 nV/rtHzThe MAXIM part is lower noise right?....Not Exactly

Broadband Voltage Noise Comparison

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

Vo

lta

ge

No

ise

Sp

ectr

al D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

OPA2188 MAX44251

Page 30: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

30

Gain Effects on Total Noise: Chopping InGain Effects on Total Noise: Chopping In--BandBand

• MAX44251: GBW 10MHz, Chopping frequency 65kHz

– Broadband Noise Spectral Density: 5.9 nV/rtHz

– Chopper noise scales with gain! Input referred

MAX44251 Output Noise Spectral Density

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

No

ise

Sp

ec

tra

l D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

Gain x1 Gain x11 Gain x101

Page 31: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

31

Gain Effects on Total Noise: Chopping OutGain Effects on Total Noise: Chopping Out--ofof--BandBand

• OPA2188: GBW 3MHz, Chopping Frequency >650kHz

– Broadband Noise Spectral Density: 8.8 nV/rtHz, synchronous notch filtering

– Chopper noise scaling with gain is minimal Output referred

OPA2188 Output Noise Spectral Density

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

No

ise S

pectr

al D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

Gain x1 Gain x11 Gain x101

Page 32: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

32

Application TipsApplication Tips

Page 33: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

33

Adding an RC output filter can mitigate noise seen by high impedance loads

– COUT chosen to have an impedance much less than RLOAD at the chopping frequency

– ROUT chosen to maintain opamp stability with the chosen COUT

Output FilteringOutput Filtering

Page 34: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

34

Output FilteringOutput Filtering• The contributions of the

individual noise sources can

be visualized with the circuit at right

• The corner frequency of the filter as seen by the voltage

noise is directly determined by Rout and Cout

• The corner frequency for the

transient current noise is actually much lower

– The filter now includes the feedback resistance RF

– Filter corner frequency can be chosen to remove current

noise without affecting desired signal

– RG also attenuates the noise developed across the load

OUTOUT

VCCR

f∗∗

=π2

12

System Noise

Voltage Noise

Current Noise

OUTFOUT

IBCRR

f∗+∗

=)(2

12

π

Page 35: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

35

Consider the addition of an output RC filter to an OPA2188:

RF: 10kOhms, RG: 100 Ohms

ROUT: 100 Ohms, COUT: 10nF

The measurement circuit and calculation of the two corner frequencies created by this filter are shown below:

kHznFCR

fOUTOUT

VC 15910*100*2

1

2

12 =

Ω=

∗∗=

ππ

kHznFkCRR

fOUTFOUT

IB 576.110)10100(2

1

)(2

12 =

∗Ω+Ω∗=

∗+∗=

ππ

Output Filtering ExampleOutput Filtering Example

Page 36: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

36

Output FilteringOutput Filtering

• Harmonics due to input current spikes are completely eliminated

• Noise at chopping frequency travels through the opamp (not around the feedback network)

Output Filter Effectiveness

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

Vo

lta

ge

No

ise

Sp

ec

tra

l D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

OPA2188 (x101) OPA2188 (x101) Filter

Page 37: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

37

Output FilteringOutput Filtering

OPA2188 Without Filtering

– Gain: 101, RF:10k, RG:100 Ohm

– Oscilloscope 1MOhm input impedance is the load

– Input current spikes are visible above other noise sources

OPA2188 With Filtering

– Gain: 101 RF: 10k, RG: 100 Ohm

– Oscilloscope 1MOhm input

impedance is the load

Page 38: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

38

Comparison to NonComparison to Non--Chopper AmplifiersChopper Amplifiers

The filtered output spectrum of the OPA2188 was compared to a traditional

precision bipolar part

– Removal of the chopping noise makes the high frequency noise spectrum

comparable.

Output Noise Comparison

1.00E-09

1.00E-08

1.00E-07

1.00E-06

1.00E-05

1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07

Frequency (Hz)

No

ise

Sp

ec

tra

l D

en

sit

y (

V/r

tHz)

OP2177 (x101) OPA2188 (x101) Filter

Page 39: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

39

Minimizing Chopper Noise EffectsMinimizing Chopper Noise Effects

• Input current spikes are not amplified by the part

– Spikes on the inverting input will be coupled to the load by the feedback

network

• Minimize feedback resistance values

– Reduces the voltage produced by current spikes

– Standard design practice for low-noise, low-drift circuits

• Load impedance directly contributes to the magnitude of voltage

produced by the spike

• An RC filter is an extremely effective way to reduce output noise

– Most practical with high-impedance loads

– Corner frequency can be placed outside of the signal bandwidth

– Noise through the feedback network experiences a much greater

attenuation

Page 40: Chopper Noise v2 - ElectroOptical• Broadband noise reduction is expected from reduced thermal noise of resistances • Reduction in chopper harmonics due to reduced contribution

40

Thank You!Thank You!