Upload
r-p-yadav
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Citizenship in a Globalized World
1/4
Citizenship in a Globalized World
By Greta GilbertsonFordham University
January 2006
Citizenship is a multidimensional concept that means membership in a
specific nation-state and the formal rights and obligations that this
membership entails. Citizenship can also be understood as a status and an
identity. The principle premise of citizenship is that nation-states can set and
control the parameters of membership.
The words citizenship and nationality are often used interchangeably (i.e.,
dual nationality, dual citizenship). However, nationalityis often used to
signify membership in a community on the basis of common cultural
characteristics whilecitizenship refers to membership conferred by a state.
Citizens of a nation-state may include those who see themselves as part of a
single nation based on a common culture or ethnicity, but more often include
some groups who are seen as outside of national culture and incapable of
belonging.
Since the 1970s, increased flows of goods, services, money, ideas, and
people across national borders have led to economic integration and
interdependence among nation-states. This shift from an autonomous nation-
state to a world of blurred boundaries has helped change the traditional
notion of citizenship.
While the vast majority of people still have membership in a single nation-
state, the number of people who hold membership in more than one nation-
state is growing. As a result, citizenship has become contested both in
Europe and North America.
Historical Background
The concept of citizenship dates back to the Roman Republic. Then, as a result of the emergence of the modern state during the Renaissance, citizenship
grew from a local into a statewide institution.
In the 20th century, the expansion of citizenship occurred through the elaboration of rights accorded to citizens, including not only political rights, but
civil and social rights. The expansion of social rights has been associated with the growth of the welfare state and was the basis for incorporating new
groups into the state.
Formal Citizenship
Citizenship laws and naturalization policies are the means through which nation-states determine who remains inside and outside the circle of formal,legal membership. Formal, legal members are almost always entitled to social, economic, and political rights; these rights are balanced by certain duties
or obligations to the state.
The attribution of citizenship refers to the nation-state's basis for allocating citizenship. The acquisition of citi zenship (also known as naturalization) refers
to the process through which a person who does not have membership can become a formal, legal member of the nation-state. Acquiring citizenship is
structured by naturalization policies and procedures that vary by country.
Attribution and acquisition of citizenship are structured on two principles: jus soli(the conferral of citizenship to persons born in the state's territory, or
soil) andjus sanguinis (the conferral of citizenship to persons with a citizen parent or parents, or blood). Most nation-states base their citizenship laws on
a combination ofjus soliandjus sanguinis.
Countries of immigrants such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and most Latin American countries attribute citizenship unconditionally to all
persons born in their territory (jus soli) as well as to the children of their citizens who are born abroad (jus sanguinis).
Citizenship and naturalization policies based mainly onjus sanguinis are restricted to ethnics and their descendants. Most European countries
emphasizejus sanguinis principles, which has made citizenship more difficult to acquire.
However, many observers agree that citizenship laws and naturalization policies in Europe have become more inclusive, meaning that access tocitizenship has been opened to long-term residents and their children who were previously excluded from citizenship. For example, in 1999, Germany
liberalized its conservativejus sanguinis laws with a more liberaljus solipolicy.
No European country grants unconditional birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants. The children of immigrants (second generation) in many
European countries also must acquire citizenship; access to citizenship occurs only after fulfilling certain residency or age requirements. For example,
second-generation children born in France of two non-French parents cannot become French citizens until they turn 18, provided they have resided in
France for at least five years.
Although the trend toward liberalizing citizenship and naturalization policies has received much attention, it is characteristic of countries with formerly
restrictive naturalization policies. As political scientist Patrick Weil points out, some countries whose nationality laws were predicated upon jus soliand
that have attracted large numbers of immigrants such as the UK and Ireland have adopted more restrictive citizenship policies.
7/31/2019 Citizenship in a Globalized World
2/4
For example, the UK allowed the people living in its former colonies to have British Commonwealth Citizenship, which gave them the right to settle in the
UK without first acquiring work or residence permits. With the British Nationality Act of 1981, the country abolished this status and created a multitiered
citizenship system. In 2004, Ireland's citizens passed a referendum that eliminates an Irish-born child's automatic right to citizenship when both parents
are not Irish nationals.
Worldwide, the number of stateless persons is rising. The United Nations defines a stateless person as someone who is not considered a national by any
state. The rigid practice ofjus sanguinis policies can result in statelessness. In other cases, a child with a non-national father born in their mother's
country of nationality may be denied that nationality as a result of gender restrictions on the transmission of nationality.
Statelessness also occurs when long-residing ethnic populations have been denied citizenship or have been stripped of citizenship as a result of theirracial or ethnic origins.
Temporary Admissions and Pathways to Citizenship
Although someone may enter a country on a nonimmigrant visa, the person may be able to become a permanent resident and even a citizen by fulfilling
requirements. For example, Australia permits foreign students who graduate from Australian universities to apply for the skilled migration program;
through that program, they can become permanent residents and eventually citizens.
A person who marries a citizen of a different country can usually obtain citizenship of the spouse's country by meeting requirements regarding length of
marriage and residency.
It is important to emphasize that numerous temporary admission policies do not permit the eventual acquisition of citizenship. Many people migrate
under intergovernmental agreements or visas that formally dictate that they must leave the host country after a specified time. Guest workers and
contract laborers an important source of labor in the Middle East and in some Asian countries are often legally prohibited from settling, forming
families, or becoming citizens.
Although the United States has a relatively small numbers of temporary workers, recent proposals by members of Congress indicate that the country may
create a new temporary-worker status aimed at reducing the number of unauthorized migrants. However, not all proposals would allow such workers toeventually become US citizens.
The Growth of Multiple Citizenship
Today, holding citizenship in more than one country has become more common. People may have dual citizenship by operation of different laws rather
than by choice. For example, a child born in a foreign country to US citizen parents may be both a US citizen and a citizen of the country of birth.
Historically, most countries tried to discourage dual citizenship by requiring newcomers to renounce their country of origin citizenship in order to
naturalize, and origin countries took away citizenship if emigrants became naturalized citizens of other states. However, such policies were not always
enforced.
The increase in mobility, the ability of children to acquire the citizenship of not only their father but their mother, the development of new norms and
human rights standards, and changing policies have contributed to the growth of dual and sometimes multiple citizenship.
"Immigrant dual citizenship" permits immigrants to maintain their origin citizenship while becoming a citizen of the settlement country. An increasing
number of migrant-sending states Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Italy, Mexico, and Turkey have changed their policies to allow dual
citizenship. These policies are beneficial to sending states, especially in light of the growing importance of remittances and investment from nationals
living abroad.
Long-standingjus sanguinis policies allow ethnic descendents of countries such as Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and
the United Kingdom to either maintain or claim the citizenship of their parents and grandparents. These policies facilitated the claim to European
citizenship by thousands of descendents of Italians, Spanish, Poles, and others who migrated to Latin America in the early 20th century.
In response to deteriorating economic conditions at home, Argentines in particular have used ethnic claims to Italian and Spanish citizenship to legally
migrate to the European Union (EU) in search of better economic opportunities. As EU citizens, they are able to reside and work anywhere in the EU, not
only the country for which they have citizenship.
There is little reliable data on the numbers of dual or plural nationals around the world. According to some reports, about half of all countries allow dual
citizenship. Of 15 EU countries studied by political scientist Marc Howard, 10 allow immigrants who naturalize to hold dual citizenship.
Australia, Canada, and the United States do not require new citi zens to officially renounce their citizenship of origin, but a US citizen who acquires a
foreign citizenship by applying for it could lose US citizenship, which would not happen to an Australian or Canadian citizen in the same situation.
Although many countries have liberalized policies related to dual citizenship, since the September 11 terrorist attacks, some have questioned this policy,
especially in cases where a dual citizen has been involved in suspect activity.
In some countries, Germany in particular, dual citizenship has been subject to a great deal of political debate because some see it as weakening
citizenship and/or loyalty to Germany. Others argue that immigrant dual citizenship facilitates integration in the receiving community by encouraging
immigrants to naturalize.
The Growth of Quasi-Citizenship
Immigrants today are more likely be members of two states, either as citizens of one and settled migrants (also known as quasi-citizens or denizens) of
another, or as citizens of both. The rights of quasi-citizens can include long-term or permanent security of residence status; protection from deportation
(except in exceptional circumstances); the right to work and seek employment; voting in local elections; and entitlements to some social benefits. In the
United States, legal permanent residents, or green card holders, are quasi-citizens who can live and work permanently anywhere in the country; they can
become naturalized citizens once they are eligible.
In Europe, the growth of quasi-citizenship is linked partly to restrictive naturalization policies and the growing importance of international human rights
7/31/2019 Citizenship in a Globalized World
3/4
standards to which many European countries are signatories (for more on rights and migration, click here).
Internationally protected civil, political, economic, and social rights may not lessen the importance of national citizenship rights, but they do serve as an
alternative source of some rights and decouple rights from the national context. However, many states do not adhere to them, and individuals face
constraints in successfully claiming these rights.
Supranational Citizenship
Supranational rights have developed over the past half century in Europe and characterize EU citizenship. British Commonwealth Citizenship is an
example of a supranational membership or citizenship system that predates modern regional and political associations such as the EU.
EU citizenship embodies the idea of a common citizenship across all EU Member States and could eventually serve as the basis for a European identity.
EU citizenship transforms the notion and practices associated with state sovereignty, a key principle underlying citizenship. Freedom of movement, the
most widely known right of EU citizenship, restrains the ability of states to exclude foreigners, thereby weakening national sovereignty.
Although some have hailed EU citizenship as a new, post-national form of membership, it remains subordinate to national citizenship. It is linked to the
citizenship of a Member State, and Member States still control who can receive their citizenship.
Naturalization Rates, Practices, and Policies
Naturalization often depends on a period of legal (and sometimes continuous) residence, proficiency in the national language, and knowledge of the
country's history and/or culture. Many countries demand that candidates for naturalization be "of good character," meaning they cannot have been
convicted of a crime. Because of such requirements, not all immigrants who apply for naturalization are successful. Some countries, including the United
States, require citizenship applicants to make a formal oath of allegiance at a public ceremony.
Naturalization rates among the world's major receiving countries vary greatly. The following are the number of naturalizations per thousand foreign
residents in 1995 and should be interpreted with caution because not all foreign residents are eligible to naturalize. Sociologists Stephen Castles and
Alastair Davidson found that rates were still very low in Germany (5), likewise in Switzerland (12). The rates for France (17), Belgium (29), and the UK(19) were higher, and Sweden (60) and the Netherlands (98) had the highest rates. The rate for Australia was 74.
Rates for the US and Canada could not be calculated due to lack of data on the total number of foreign residents. However, the large numbers
naturalizing (over a quarter of a million in Canada and nearly a half a million in the United States in 1995) suggested high rates in these countries, too.
Moreover, the number of persons naturalizing in the US jumped sharply in the mid 1990s with over one million naturalizing in 1996.
Western European scholarship on formal citizenship has focused on the legal structures of citizenship and the rights accorded to citizens versus non-
citizens, while US research tends to focus on naturalization rates. Much of the US literature attempts to explain differences in rates based on, for
example, country of origin, age at arrival, time in the United States, class of admission, and various demographic characteristics. Comparable studies are
starting to be seen in Europe as the number of naturalizations has increased.
Although naturalization injus solis countries such as Canada, the United States, and Australia is relatively easy compared to the naturalization
requirements of some European countries, naturalization has rarely been a straightforward decision for immigrants, even in countries where citizenship is
relatively easy to acquire. Becoming a citizen is generally less important to an immigrant or potential immigrant than gaining initial admission and
permission to work.
In the US case, immigrants historically have varied widely in their willingness to become citizens, and naturalization rates remained low for many groups
throughout the 20th century for reasons that are complex and not always well understood.
In traditional immigrant-receiving countries, the ideology of naturalization has been strongly assimilationist. The reality is that immigrants often approach
naturalization with some concerns or with practical interests in mind that run counter to traditional membership norms. These include the notion that
immigrants should be members of a single state, rather than multiple states; that membership should be earned through assimilation, rather than
acquired as a right; and that citizenship requires sacrifice on the part of its holders, rather than involving calculations of personal advantage.
Laws that restrict benefits to legal permanent residents can encourage eligible immigrants to naturalize. In response to such legislation in the United
States in the mid 1990s, some states established centers to help eligible immigrants naturalize; the state's desire to preserve residents' federal benefits
therefore also played a role. This example underscores the importance of naturalization and citizenship policies and how they are administered on the
ground level.
The Broadening of Citizenship in a Globalized World
With the rise of globalization, the concept of citizenship as a form of membership and identity in one nation-state has changed. The increase in the
number of countries allowing dual citizenship and noncitizen rights has made the acquisition of citizenship less pressing.
In addition, migrants' transnational behavior has made national citizenship less relevant. As legal scholar Linda Bosniak has written, national affiliations
do matter, but they are not necessarily paramount in many people's experiences.
On the other hand, the rise of nativism, in part the result of globalization and concerns about the risks of immigration linked to terrorism, has
reinvigorated debates about national membership and loyalty to one state. What these trends mean, both for states and for immigrants, is the subject of
present and future research.
Sources
Bosniak, Linda. 2001. "Denationalizing Citzenship," p. 237-252 in, Eds. Aleinikoff, Alexander and Douglas Klusmeyer. Citizenship Today: Global
Perspectives and Practices. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: 2001.
Castles, Stephen and Alastair Davidson. 2001. Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. New York: Routledge
Howard, Marc Morje. 2005. "Variation in Dual Citizen Policies in the Countries of the EU." International Migration Review39.
http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=291http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=291http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=291http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=2917/31/2019 Citizenship in a Globalized World
4/4
Weil, Patrick. "Access to Citizenship: A Comparison of Twenty-Five Nationality Laws," in, Aleinikoff, Alexander and Douglas Klusmeyer (Eds.). Citizenship
Today: Global Perspectives and Practices. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: 2001.